Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CP Symmetry in Particle Physics
Introduction Results
B-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Boštjan GolobFaculty of Mathematics and Physics
Jožef Stefan Institute Belle/Belle II Collaboration Introduction
B-Factory
University of Ljubljana
“Jožef Stefan” Institute
Exp. method
ResultsResults
Interpretation
Physics in Ljubljana Summer School, Ljubljana, July 2011
Future
Quest for New Physics
B. Golob 1/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
j j y y
Introduction
Why CP (A)Symmetry?
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
y ( ) y y
The amount of matter (particles) and anti-matter (anti-particles) in th l U i th
considering baryons (like protons): Nb-Nb = 0the early Universe was the same;
Nowadays (at least “near”) Universe (~ 10 Mpc; 1 Mpc = 3 3 106 light years)
Nb Nb 0initial state of Universe
(~ 10 Mpc; 1 Mpc = 3,3⋅106 light years)consist of matter;
During the evolution of Universe baryons
experimental determination(e.g. AMS experiment):
NNNNDuring the evolution of Universe baryonsannihilated into photons
b + b → γ910 1010 −− −=
=+−
=−
bb
bbbb
NNNN
NNN
γ
γNγ ∼ Nb + Nb(Microwave Cosmic Background) In the Universe today particles
completely dominate over
B. Golob 2/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Why all anti-baryons annihilated, while 1/109 baryons did not?
p yanti-particles
Introduction
Why CP (A)Symmetry?
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
y ( ) y y
A. Saharov, 1967: necessary conditions for the evolution f t i U i ( tt d i t
C: charge conjugation operator
C|X> = ± |X>of asymmetric Universe (matter dominates over anti-matter):- baryon number violation,
thermal non equilibrium
P: parity operator
P|X> = ± |X>- thermal non-equilibrium, - CP and C symmetry violation (CPV)
P|X> = ± |X>
CPV: physical processes are not equal when spatial CPV is necessary condition
f
CPV: decays of particles proceed slightly differently than decays of anti-particles
coordinates are inverted and particles are exchanged by anti-particles
for matter dominated universe
y y p
B+
K+
π+B-π-
π+
CP
B. Golob 3/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
π+
π- K-CP
Introduction
Why CP (A)Symmetry?
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
y ( ) y y
CPV can be studied with elementary particles
mesons: particles composed of q and q’B mesons: mesons composed of b and q’
CPV discovered in 1964 in decays of neutral kaons (Nobel prize James Cronin Val Fitch 1980)
mesons composed of b and q
meson quarkiti
mass(G V/ 2)
lifetime
James Cronin, Val Fitch 1980)
Since 1999: precise measurements with B mesons to understand composition (GeV/c2)
B0 bd 5.28 1.54 ps
B- bu 5.28 1.67 ps
with B mesons to understand the underlying principle
=> B meson “factories”
B0 bd 5.28 1.54 ps
B+ bu 5.28 1.67 ps
B. Golob 4/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
p
B-Factory
Accelerator KEKB:KEKB:
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Tokyo (40 mins by Tsukuba Exps)“BB--Factory”,Factory”, KEKB @ KEK
e- (HER): 8.0 GeVe+ (LER): 3.5 GeV
ECMS=M(Υ(4S))c2
e-
e+b
bu,d
b
bΥ(4S)
Bd0, B+
e bu,d
Bd0, B-
e+e- → Υ(4S) → Bd0Bd
0, B+B-Copious production of B mesons possible at “B-Factories”
B. Golob 5/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
(from 1999 - 2010 ~109 BB pairs)
B-Factory
Detector Belle
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Central Drift Chamber e+
3(4) layerSi det.
3.5 GeV
AerogelCherenkov
e-
8 GeV
(n=1.015-1.030)
1.5T SC solenoid
EM calorimeterCsI (16X )
µ and KLCounter(14/15 layersRPC+Fe) CsI (16X0)RPC Fe)
Various detector modules to determine - charged particles momenta, energy, id (pions, kaons, protons, electrons,...)
B. Golob 6/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
g p , gy, (p , , p , , )- neutral particles energy, id (γ, neutral kaons, neutral pions...)- common decay points of various final state particles from B meson decays
Exp. method
Method of (one of) mesurementsMethod of (one of) mesurements particles detectedi d t t
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
e od o (o e o ) esu e e se od o (o e o ) esu e e s in detectorshort-lived particles not directly detected
B i
J/ψ
µ+
µ-
π-
Fully reconstructed B decayinto CP eigenstate (B0 or B0
can decay to it) T i f
B0 or B0
Bsig
Btag
Ks π+
K-l -
Tagging ofother B flavor
from thecharge∆t=∆z/βγc
Υ(4
s)
gof typical
decayproducts
∆t=∆z/βγcdeterminedB0(B0) ∆z ~ 100µm
Determination of the time between decays of two B’s
B. Golob 7/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Exp. methodIntroduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
∆t distribution for Υ(4S) → B0 B0 → (e.g. J/ψ Ks) (Xtag):
q = ± 1: Btag = B0, B0 Sf ≠ 0: time dependent CP violation (TCPV)Af ≠ 0: time independent CP violation (DCPV)∆md: B0B0 oscillation freq. f p ( )∆md: B B oscillation freq.
Why Sf ≠ 0, Af ≠ 0 means CPV?
)()( 00 BBtBBt ∆∆ PP)cos()sin(
);();();();(
00
00
tmtmBBtBBtBBtBBt
A fftagtag
tagtagCP ∆∆+∆∆=
=∆+=∆
=∆−=∆= AS
PPPP
B. Golob 8/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Quantities determining difference between B0 and B0 can be measured
Results
Btag=B0ResultsResults one quantity related to CPV in system of B mesons
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Belle PRD66 032007 (2002)
Btag BBtag=B0
ResultsResults in system of B mesons measured with a great precision
Belle, PRD66, 032007 (2002)
significant measurement of CPV in B0 system;exp. evidence that CPV is indeed intrinsic property of weak interaction (CPV in K0 - 1964)property of weak interaction (CPV in K 1964)
Sf =0.99 ± 0.14 ± 0.06
Belle, PRL98, 031802 (2008)
Sf =0.642 ± 0.031 ± 0.017A
Sf,1999-2010:from free parameter of SM to precision measurement with accuracy ±3% (world
ACP
B. Golob 9/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
measurement with accuracy ±3% (world average)
Interpretation
CP symmetry among particles (Standard Model):
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
CP symmetry among particles (Standard Model):
KobayashiKobayashi--MaskawaMaskawa mechanism: mechanism: Carrier of weak interaction
Vud Vus VubV V V
W+qi
qV
Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa(CKM) matrix
XVcd Vcs VcbVtd Vts Vtb
qjVij(CKM) matrix
M. Kobayashi, T. Maskawa, Prog.Th.Phys.49, 652 (1973) (6140 citations) A(X →qiqj) ∝Vij
W-qi
if Vij=Vij* ► SM Lagrangian L =LCP ►
CP symmetry is conserved X
qjV*ijif elements of CKM matrix
complex ⇒ CPV
X
A(X →qiqj) ∝Vij*
B. Golob 10/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
A(X →qiqj) Vij
Interpretation
Basic motivation
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
V V V c12c13 s12c13 s13e-iφ
KobayashiKobayashi--Maskawa mechanism: Maskawa mechanism: can be parametrizedb 4 l tVud Vus Vub
Vcd Vcs VcbVtd Vts Vtb
c12c13 s12c13 s13e φ
-s12c23 c12c23 s23
s12s23-c12c23s13eiφ -c12s23 c23c13
=by 4 real parameters: 3 angles and one complex phase
All various observables related to CPV (not only the example
sij = sinθij, cij = cosθij
a ous obse ab es e ated to C ( ot o y t e e a p eshown in previous slides) can be related to the complex phase of CKM matrix
perform measurements of different observablesperform measurements of different observables ⇒ check if results agree with predictions of
Kobayashi-Maskawa model By performing measurement of various CPV observables Kobayashi Maskawa mechanism
B. Golob 11/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanismcan be tested
Interpretation
Maj 1999 Maj 1999 -- July 2010July 2010 φ3, Dalitzl i
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
X(3872)
Belle, PRD73, 112009(2006) 48 citations
analysis
Belle, PRL103, 171801 (2009) 44 citations
B → K*l+l-
Belle, PRD68, 012001 (2003) 92 citations
TCPV, B0 → π+π- φ2
Belle, PRL91, 262001 (2003) 528 citations
X(3872)
Belle, PRL103, 241801
B+ → Xs γ
(2009) 44 citations
(2003) 92 citations
Belle, PRL91, 261602
TCPV, B0 → φKS, K+K-KS, η’KS, sin(2φ1
eff) DCPV difference, B0 → K+π- in B+ → K+π0
, ,(2009) 15 citations
Belle, PRD66, 032007 (2002) 96 i i
TCPV, sin(2φ1)
, ,(2003) 145 citations
D0 mixing
Belle, Nature, 452, 332 (2008) 63 citations
(2002) 96 citations
B ll PRL93 021601 B+ → τ+ν
Belle, PRL98, 211803 (2007) 184 citations
B. Golob 12/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Belle, PRL93, 021601 (2004) 117 citatovBelle, PRL93, 191802 (2004) 137 citatov
DCPV, B0 → π+π-, K+π-
Belle, PRL97, 251802 (2006) 199 citations
B → τ ν
Interpretation
Verification of Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
y
Perhaps most valuable confirmation of the importance of B-factories (Belle + BaBar) measurements:
2008
“During the past decade, elementary particle physicists have measured K b hi d M k ' th
2008
Kobayashi and Maskawa's theory with great precision and found that it really does fit the data.”
L. Brink, 2008 Nobel Prizet ti hpresentation speech
KEKB/BelleMay 1999 May 1999 -- July 2010July 2010
B. Golob 13/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
KEKB accelerator control room, July 2010: director general of KEK pressed the beam abort button of KEKB for the last time ⇒ SuperKEKB
Future
KobayashiKobayashi--Maskawa mechanism: Maskawa mechanism:
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
CPV as measured can explain baryon asymmetry of the Universeof smaller magnitude than observed
yy
d t
1610~ −
+−
BB
BB
NNNN
910 1010 −−− BB NNgand not
CPV as observed nowadaysis too small to explain the matter asymmetry of the universe
1010 −=+ BB
B
NN
while most of measurements agree with SM predictions, there are measured
matter asymmetry of the universe
uB+ τ+W+
discrepancies at the level of few standard deviationsexample:
b ν(H+)
410)34.064.1()( −+ ⋅±=→τνBBB(B → τν): contribution of charged Higgs
boson (in Minimal SuypersymmetricStandard Model)
Heavy Flavor Averaging Group,http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/
)()(
410)76.0()( 06011.0 −+ ⋅±=→τνBSMB
B. Golob 14/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
CKMFitter, http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/
10)76.0()( 06.0±→τνBBcontribution of NP can have observable effect in rare processes within the SM
Future
Way to proceed?
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
y p
Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism confirmed with accuracy available from existing B-factories;existing B factories;
hints of SM breakdown require at least one order of magnitude better accuracy;
σ ∝1/√N ⇒ O(102) higher luminosity
BeyondBeyondStandardModel
Belle II experiment will search for unknown particles and processes with unprecedented precision
B. Golob 15/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
with unprecedented precision
Quest for NP
High energy/high precision
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Two complementary approachesTwo complementary approaches
high energy frontier high precision frontierAtlas, LHC
Belle II, SuperKEKB, p
figures approx. to scale
Search for production of unknown particles at highest achievable energies
Search for effect of unknown particleson processes very rare within the SM
B. Golob 16/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
particles at highest achievable energiesLHC
on processes very rare within the SMSuperKEKB
Quest for NP
LHC Operation and PlansLHC Operation and Plans
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
p - p collisions at largest attainable energies
produce so far unknown particles in these
pp
produce so far unknown particles in these collisions
Current status: LHC operation progressing better than planed.★High energy proton proton collisions at 7 TeV★Pb Pb heavy ion collisions at 2.76 TeV.Target is to collect Li t ~ 2 3 fb-1 of proton dataTarget is to collect Lint ~ 2-3 fb 1 of proton data by the end of 2011.Then technical stop in 2012 with upgrade/repair.In 2013 the LHC will ramp up to 14 TeVcentre-of-mass energy start collecting statistics with a high rate with Lint ~ 10 fb-1 by the end of the year
Ncoll = Lint x σ
B. Golob 17/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Quest for NP
LHC Operation and PlansLHC Operation and Plans SM Higgs discovery potential at 14 TeV
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Example: Search for Higgs boson
pp
in SM Lagrangian terms related to masses of all particles require the existence of H;
not yet observed experimentally;
search for produced Higgs bosons at LHC in various decay modesin various decay modes
example of H reconstruction when decaying to γ γ which are detected in Atlas detectorIf Standard Model Higgs exists, ATLAS will find it... Same holds for possible supersymmetric
B. Golob 18/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
Same holds for possible supersymmetricparticles, etc.
Particle physics at FMF
SummarySummary
Introduction ResultsB-Factory Interpretation
Exp. method Future
Staff at FMF take part in the world-wide cutting edge research
yy
Some expert courses(2nd cycle degree):
in both experimental and theoretical particle physics
N t iti f
Nuclei, quarks, leptons
Advanced particle detectors and d t iNumerous opportunities for
international research work during studies, detector development & data analyisis (Master PhD thesis)
data processing
Experimental physics of elementary particles and nuclei& data analyisis (Master, PhD thesis)
Courses to lead your way in particle (and general) physics
y p
Quantum field theory
Theory of elementary particles( g ) y
Theory of elementary particles and nuclei
Gauge field theory
B. Golob 19/19Physics in Ljubljana, FMF, July 2011
g y
....