31
CALLINECTES SAPIDUS AND UCA SPP. MEGALOPAE INCREASE DUE TO WIND EVENTS ALONG EACH SIDE OF DELAWARE BAY By Patrick Reynolds Marine Academy of Science and Technology

Introduction

  • Upload
    callie

  • View
    51

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CALLINECTES SAPIDUS AND UCA SPP. MEGALOPAE INCREASE DUE TO WIND EVENTS ALONG EACH SIDE OF DELAWARE BAY By Patrick Reynolds Marine Academy of Science and Technology. Introduction. Background. Final stage 1 mm width 21-49 days. Types of Megalopae Studied. Callinectes sapidus. Uca spp. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction

  

CALLINECTES SAPIDUS AND UCA SPP. MEGALOPAE INCREASE DUE TO WIND EVENTS ALONG EACH SIDE OF

DELAWARE BAY

By Patrick ReynoldsMarine Academy of Science and Technology

Page 2: Introduction

Introduction

Page 3: Introduction

Background

• Final stage

• 1 mm width

• 21-49 days

Page 4: Introduction

Types of Megalopae Studied

Uca spp.

Callinectes sapidus

Page 5: Introduction

Original Locations

Moby’s Dock at Atlantic Highlands, NJ Navesink River Rd., Monmouth Beach, NJ

Page 6: Introduction

New Location

• Delaware Bay

Page 7: Introduction

New Locations Continued…New Jersey Side:Cape May, NJ

Coast Guard Base

Delaware Side:Lewes, DE

Broadkill River

Page 8: Introduction

Effects of Wind

•DE Buoy 44009

Page 9: Introduction

Hypothesis

H-Wind events will result in significant increases in the Callinectes sapidus and Uca spp. megalopae population caught along the New Jersey and Delaware coasts of the Delaware Bay.

Page 10: Introduction

Null and Alternate

H0-Wind events will have no effect on the Callinectes sapidus and Uca spp. megalopae population caught along the New Jersey and Delaware coasts of the Delaware Bay.

HA-Wind events will result in significant decreases in the Callinectes sapidus and Uca spp. megalopae population caught along the New Jersey and Delaware coasts of the Delaware Bay.

Page 11: Introduction

Method

Page 12: Introduction

Equipment• Life Jackets

• Megalopae Catching Device(MCD)

• Filter

• Container

• Squirt Bottle

• Sieve

• Buckets

Page 13: Introduction

MCDsFILTERPVC PIPE

Page 14: Introduction

Deployment

Page 15: Introduction

Retrieval

Page 16: Introduction

Soak Filters

Page 17: Introduction

Pour through Sieve

Page 18: Introduction

Fill Up Squirt Bottle and Container

Page 19: Introduction

Remove Megalopae from Sieve

Page 20: Introduction

• UCA spp. caught more frequently

• Maximum megalopae caught– Delaware side

– Uca spp.

– 102.25

Results

Page 21: Introduction

GRAPH 1 CALLINECTES SAPIDUS MEGALOPAE

PERCENT OF MAXIMUM CATCH FOR DE AND NJ IN 1996

GRAPH 2UCA spp. MEGALOPAE PERCENT OF

MAXIMUM CATCH FOR DE AND NJ IN 1996

Page 22: Introduction

GRAPH 3CALLINECTES SAPIDUS MEGALOPAE

PERCENT OF MAXIMUM CATCH FOR DE AND NJ IN 1997

GRAPH 4UCA spp. MEGALOPAE PERCENT OF

MAXIMUM CATCH FOR DE AND NJ IN 1997

Page 23: Introduction

GRAPH 5CALLINECTES SAPIDUS MEGALOPAE

PERCENT OF MAXIMUM CATCH FOR DE AND NJ IN 1998

GRAPH 6UCA spp. MEGALOPAE PERCENT OF MAXIMUM CATCH FOR DE AND NJ

IN 1998

Page 24: Introduction

96 97 98RANGE 0-61.75 0-102.25 0-60

DELAWARE MEAN 8.36 11.42 3.95DEVIATION 12.81 17.74 7.38

DATE 12-Aug 14-Jul 13-Jul

RANGE 0-91.25 0-51.75 0-70.38NEW JERSEY MEAN 10.53 6.36 6.76

DEVIATION 20.12 10.13 12.71DATE 12-Aug 14-Jul 13-Jul

TABLE 1CATCH DATA FOR UCA SPP. MEGALOPAE FROM 1996-1998 OF DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY

TABLE 2CATCH DATA FOR CALLINECTES SAPIDUS MEGALOPAE FROM 1996-1998 OF DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY

96 97 98RANGE 0-8.75 0-28.75 0-9.75

DELAWARE MEAN 0.77 1.37 0.91DEVIATION 1.41 3.39 1.42DATE 12-Aug 14-Jul 13-Jul

RANGE 0-.25 0-21.7 0-.375NEW JERSEY MEAN 0.009 0.48 0.009

DEVIATION 0.04 2.94 0.053DATE 12-Aug 14-Jul 13-Jul

Page 25: Introduction

G-Test

• Statistical Analysis

• P-value 0.05– Degree of freedom = 3

– Greater than 7.815 would prove difference

P-Value= 0.05 Degree of Freedom

3.841 1

5.991 2

7.815 3

Page 26: Introduction

G-Test Continued…YEAR SITE/TYPE O*Ln(O/E) (P-Value)

1996 NJ/CAL 3.8955

1996 NJ/UCA 12.281

1996 DE/CAL 3.9063

1996 DE/UCA 3.2246

1997 NJ/CAL 2.9461

1997 NJ/UCA 1.0676

1997 DE/CAL 1.2168

1997 DE/UCA .59076

1998 NJ/CAL 5.4628

1998 NJ/UCA 5.1255

1998 DE/CAL 6.6556

1998 DE/UCA 6.4813

Page 27: Introduction

Conclusion

Page 28: Introduction

Errors

• Method

• Location

• Human Error

Page 29: Introduction

Acknowledgements

• Dr. Peter M. Rowe (Mentor)

• Dr. Cecilia Natunewicz (Delaware Bay Data)

• Mrs. Barbara Boyd (Instructor)

• Ms. Liza Baskin (Instructor)

Page 30: Introduction

Bibliography

• Epifanio, C.E. (n.a.) Dispersal and Recruitment of Blue Crab Larvae in Delaware Bay. SciVerse. Retrieved May 6, 2011, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0272771484900027

• Epifanio, CE., Garvine, RW. (2001) Larval transport on the Atlantic continental shelf of North America: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Scie, Vol 52:51-77

• Epifanio, C.E. (1995). Transport of Blue Crab Larvae in the Waters Off Mid-Atlantic States. Ingentaconnect. Retrieved May 6,2011, from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/umrsmas/bullmar/1995/00000057/00000003/art00015.

• Garvine, R. (2002). Transport and Recruitment of Blue Crab Larvae: a model with Advection and Mortality. ScienceDirect. Retrieved May 2, 2011, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771496901614

• Goodrich, David.(n.d.). Blue Crab Megalopal Influx to Chesapeake Bay. Elsevier. Retrieved May 15, 2011, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WDV-4DV0M3D-GX&_user=10&_coverDate=09%2F30%2F1989&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1752858179&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=2f0ee400ac35f46508b3975c7ff6e1c1&searchtype=a

• Jones, M.B., Epifanio, C.E. (2005) Patches of Crab Megalopae in the mouth of Delaware Bay- An analysis of spatial scales. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 24: 261-267.

Page 31: Introduction

Bibliography Continued…• Jones, M. (1995) Settlement of Brachyuran Megalopae in Delaware Bay: an

analysis of time series data. Marine Ecology Progress Series. Vol 125, 67-76.• Little, K.T., Rowe, P.M. (1988) Dispersal and recruitment of fiddler crab larvae in

the Delaware River estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol 43, 181-188.• Natunewicz, CC. (2000) Patchiness of crab larvae in coastal waters: a multi-scale

analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.• Natunewicz, CC, Epifanio, CE. (2001) Spatial and temporal scales of zoeal patches

in coastal waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol 212:217-222.• Perry, H., Eleuterius, C., Trigg, C., and Warren, J. (1995) Settlement Patterns of

Callinectes Sapidus Megalopae in Mississippi Sound: 1991, 1992. 57(3), 821-833.• Petrone, C., Jones, M.B., Natunewicz, C., Epifanio, C.E. (2005) Dynamics of larval

patches: spatial distribution of fiddler crab larvae in Delaware Bay and adjacent waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol 293: 177-190.

• Rowe, P.M., Epifanio, C.E. (1994) Tidal stream transport of weakfish larvae in Delaware Bay, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 110: 105-114.

• Van Montfrans, J., Epifanio, C., Knott, D., Lipcius, R., Mense, D., and West, T. (1995) Settlement of Blue Crab Post larvae on Western North Atlantic Estuaries. 57(3), 834-854.