12

Intro

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Intro. Sustainability. Sustainability Goals. Sustainability Goals at Can Corp. Reduction of Energy Reduction of materials used Higher Productivity-Engineered Less labor per thousand units Recycling all Steel components. All steel cans are recyclable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Intro
Page 2: Intro

Sustainability Goals at Can CorpSustainability Goals at Can Corp

• Reduction of Energy

• Reduction of materials used

• Higher Productivity-Engineered

• Less labor per thousand units

• Recycling all Steel components

Page 3: Intro

Facts about Food CansFacts about Food Cans

• All steel cans are recyclable• All steel cans contain up to

25% recycled steel• Recycling one ton of steel saves

80% of the CO2 emissions• Recycling seven steel cans

saves enough energy to power a 60 Watt light bulb for 26 hours

• Each household uses approx 600 Steel cans per year

• For every ton of Steel recycled Environmental Savings are:

• 1.5 Tons of iron Ore• 0.5 Tons of Coal• 40% of the water required to

produce one ton• 75% of the Energy needed to

make Steel from virgin materials

• 1.28 tons of Solid Waste reduction of Air Emissions

Page 4: Intro

Metal cans remain the most recyclable packaging form

• Metal cans continue to be the most recycled form of packaging, far exceeding the recycling rates of glass and plastic.

• Only half of Americans feel paperboard is recyclable, and just one-third believe pouches can be recycled (57% and 33%, respectively).

• Metal cans are 100 % recyclable

Sustained Concern Over Sustained Concern Over Packaging Impact on the Packaging Impact on the

EnvironmentEnvironment

Sustained Concern Over Sustained Concern Over Packaging Impact on the Packaging Impact on the

EnvironmentEnvironment

Page 5: Intro

10152025303540455055606570

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2005

% C

ans

Rec

ycl

ed

North American Steel IndustryNorth American Steel IndustryRecycling CommitmentRecycling Commitment

North American Steel IndustryNorth American Steel IndustryRecycling CommitmentRecycling Commitment

Page 6: Intro

15

18

21

24

27

30

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

GJ

/ To

n o

f C

rud

e S

tee

l

North American Steel IndustryNorth American Steel IndustryEnergy ImprovementsEnergy Improvements

North American Steel IndustryNorth American Steel IndustryEnergy ImprovementsEnergy Improvements

Page 7: Intro

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Kg

per

To

nn

e o

f L

iqu

id S

tee

l

Number of Recycling Cycles at a 60% Rate

North American Steel IndustryNorth American Steel IndustryCumulated Cumulated AvoidedAvoided CO2 Emissions CO2 Emissions

North American Steel IndustryNorth American Steel IndustryCumulated Cumulated AvoidedAvoided CO2 Emissions CO2 Emissions

Page 8: Intro

20

25

30

35

40

1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003

Gra

ms/

Ca

n B

od

y

North American Steel Can IndustryNorth American Steel Can IndustryRaw Material EfficiencyRaw Material Efficiency

North American Steel Can IndustryNorth American Steel Can IndustryRaw Material EfficiencyRaw Material Efficiency

Page 9: Intro

0

5

10

15

20

25

Refr'd Frozen Canned

• The most energy effective method for product delivery is canned-ready meals followed by bulk refrigerated products and fresh fruits & vegetables.

• Frozen products require about 70% more energy to bring the food from the farm to the table.

North American Delivery North American Delivery System Energy Consumption System Energy Consumption

AssessmentAssessment

North American Delivery North American Delivery System Energy Consumption System Energy Consumption

AssessmentAssessment

Page 10: Intro

Can recycling versus Plastic HDPECan recycling versus Plastic HDPE

58.4 58.5

61.7

24.3

63.0

26.0

63.4

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

2000.0 2002.0 2004.0 2005.0 2006.0

Can Recycling Plastic recycling

Page 11: Intro

Scrap Reduction per Dollar of Sales RevenueScrap Reduction per Dollar of Sales Revenue

9.4710.57

9.52

7.43

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2003 2004 2005 2006

Pounds of Scrap per Dollar of Sales Revenue

Page 12: Intro

KWH Usage down 27% = Power KWH Usage down 27% = Power to run 66 residential Homesto run 66 residential Homes

34.6133.37

28.64

25.45

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

KWH per Thousand Cans

26.5% Reduction in Electrical

Power to Manufacture Food

Cans