InterTech Environmental & Engineering, LLC A CBMA Inc. …deq.state.wy.us/wqd/WYPDES_Permitting/WYPDES_PNs_and_appr... · 2009-07-13 · InterTech Environmental & Engineering, LLC

InterTech Environmental & Engineering, LLC A CBMA Inc. Company

345 Sinclair St. ● Gillette, WY 82718 ● Office: (307) 686-6664 ● Fax: (307) 686-6640

GROUNDWATER & SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING & COMPLIANCE

INTERTECH E&E ADDITIONAL OFFICES:

3821 Beech Street Laramie, WY 82070

307.742.4991

500 W. Lott Street Buffalo, WY 82834

307.684.0252

743 Horizon Court, Suite 110 Grand Junction, CO 81506

970.263.8679

999 18th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202

303.357.4889

June 2, 2009 Ms. Becky Peters Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division 122 W. 25th Street, Herschler Bldg. 4-W Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 RE: Renewal to WYPDES Permit WY0054765 – Savageton Divide Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc., an Anadarko Petroleum Company Dear Ms. Peters: Please approve the enclosed renewal. Included are the following items:

• WYPDES Permit Renewal Application for Coal Bed Natural Gas water discharge • Tables 1A & 1B: Outfall Information • Table 2: Well Information • Table 3: Reservoir Information • Table 4: Bonding Information • Representative water quality • Compliance Evaluation • Permit Renewal Map

Under the existing WYPDES permit, Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc. an Anadarko Petroleum Company (Lance), is authorized to produce CBNG water from up to 26 wells completed within the Big George coal seam. The CBNG produced water is authorized to directly discharge into Mud Springs Creek, a tributary of the Belle Fourche River, through one (1) outfall. With this renewal application, Lance requests to remove one (1) CBNG well. The remaining 25 CBNG wells will produce from the Big George coal seam. Lance also requests to remove the reservoir associated with this facility and to maintain the current permitted flow limit of 0.59 MGD. Please refer to the Compliance Evaluation that outlines the parameter changes and compliance discussion. Please refer to question 19 of the application for representative water quality data. Because there are no constructed outfalls at this facility, a historical flow data table has not been included. If you have any permit related questions, please contact me at 307-742-4991 or by e-mail at [email protected]. Direct all correspondence to: Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc. an Anadarko Petroleum Company Attention: Timothy S. Kalus 1400 East Lincoln Street Gillette, Wyoming 82716

SUBMIT ONE HARD COPY AND ONE ELECTRONIC COPY

WYOMING POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO SURFACE DISCHARGE PRODUCED WATER FROM COAL BED METHANE NEW DISCHARGES, RENEWALS, OR MAJOR

MODIFICATIONS

Revised: 06-22-06 Revised form last updated: 9-03-08 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE (Submission of illegible materials will result in return of the application to the applicant) 1. Check the box corresponding to the type of application being applied for:

New CBM permit

CBM permit renewal Permit number: WY0054765 Expiration Date: 1/31/2010 CBM permit major modification Permit number: Expiration Date: 2. Identify the river basin in which the discharge will occur:

Belle Fourche Cheyenne Powder Little Powder Tongue

Other (identify) _________________________________________

3. Select permit option(s): if more than one option is selected, the applicant must describe which option applies to which outfall.

Option 1A – Discharge is contained within an off-channel pit (class 4C) capable of containing all effluent plus up to a 50-year / 24-hour storm event. For existing permits only, Option 1A also applies to discharges that are contained within a headwater reservoir situated within a class 4 channel and capable of containing all effluent plus up to a 50-year/24-hour storm event, provided that the discharge was permitted for 50-year/24-hour containment prior to June 24th, 2008.

Option 1B – Discharge is contained within a natural closed basin or playa lake (class 3A). For existing permits only, Option 1B also applies to discharges that are contained within a headwater reservoir situated within a class 3 channel and capable of containing all effluent plus up to a 50-year/24-hour storm event, provided that the discharge was permitted for 50-year/24 hour storm containment prior to June 24th, 2008. Option 1B headwater reservoirs shall not be located within alluvial deposits or the floodplain of any perennial, intermittent or ephemeral stream. Option 1B headwater reservoirs less than 50 acre feet in capacity shall not be located within 500 feet of such features; reservoirs greater than 50 acre feet in capacity shall not be located within ¼ mile (1320 feet) of such features.

Option 2 – This option includes any on-channel discharge (including discharge into an on-channel reservoir) that does not meet the impoundment requirements specified in options 1A or 1B above.

4. General Facility Location: Township(s): 44N Range(s): 75W

Immediate Receiving Stream(s): HUC 10: 1012020101; Mud Springs Creek which is a tributary to the Belle Fourche River.

5. Name of the facility producing the discharge (this is the facility name that will appear on the WYPDES permit) Savageton Divide

For Agency Use Only

Application Number WY00_______________

Date Received:

__________________

(mo/day/yr)

WYPDES Permit RenewalLance Oil & Gas Company Inc.an Anadarko Petroleum Company

Savageton Divide - WY0054765HUC 10: 1012020101

June 2, 2009Page 1 of 16

6. Company, Contact Name, mailing address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the individual or company which owns the facility producing the discharge, and the person (consultant) responsible for permit submission.

Company Contact Name Timothy S. Kalus

Consultant Contact Name Jason Driscoll

Company Name Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc. an Anadarko Petroleum Company

Company Name InterTech Environmental & Engineering, LLC

Mailing Address 1400 E. Lincoln St.

Mailing Address 3821 Beech Street

City, State, and Zip Code Gillette, WY 82716

City, State, and Zip Code Laramie, WY 82070

Telephone Number (307) 670-6301

Telephone Number (307) 742-4991

E-Mail Address [email protected]

E-Mail Address [email protected]

7.a. If applying for outfalls under Option 2, are any of the proposed Option 2 outfalls DIRECT DISCHARGES*that

would require the use of assimilative capacity credits for salt and sodium in the Powder River?

YES NO Not applicable. This facility is located within the Belle Fourche River watershed. 7.b. If applying for outfalls under Option 2, is it possible that INTENTIONAL RESERVOIR RELEASES* will be

requested for any of the reservoirs receiving CBM discharges under this permit?

YES NO Not applicable. This facility is located within the Belle Fourche River watershed. 8. If submitting a major modification or permit renewal, please describe all requested permit modifications (i.e. add

2 outfalls, add 23 wells, move outfall 001 500 feet…): 1. Remove associated reservoir from permit. 2. Remove one (1) CBNG well as indicated in Table 2. 3. Raise the total recoverable arsenic limit in accordance with the anti-degradation policy and Chapter 1 standard. 4. Replace total recoverable aluminum requirements with dissolved aluminum requirements. 5. Remove limit requirements for total dissolved solids. *NOTE: Major modification applications requesting to increase the permitted flow for a facility will be processed as RENEWALS. Major modification applications for permits within six months of their expiration date will also be processed as RENEWALS.

9. Name(s) and mailing address(es) of owner(s) of the surface rights on whose land the discharge occurs (in cases

where the land is owned by the state or federal government but surface rights are leased to a private individual, provide lessee’s name and address)

Landowner Name T-Chair Land Co. Mailing Address 1024 Brown Rd. City, State, and Zip Code Gillette, WY 82718-8004




10a. Please provide the maximum anticipated discharge rate, in million gallons per day (MGD), from this facility: The maximum anticipated discharge rate is 0.59 MGD. 10b. Does this facility rely on containment in reservoirs (of any type) as part of the water management strategy?

YES NO

Reservoirs are not part of the management strategy for this facility.

10c. If NO is checked above, please proceed to item #11. If YES is checked above, the permittee is required to conduct an internal evaluation of the ability of the reservoir(s) at this facility to contain discharges. Based on the results of this evaluation, please describe the ability of the reservoir(s) at this facility to contain effluent and surface run-off from precipitation events. If there are multiple reservoirs at this facility which have different reservoir containment capabilities, please describe separately, identifying reservoirs using reservoir name. For example, “Reservoir A will contain all effluent and will only overtop during a storm event of any magnitude; Reservoir B will contain all effluent plus surface run-off from up to the 50 year/24 hour storm event, etc…”:

Not applicable. Lance is requesting that the associated reservoir 21-21 be removed with this renewal.

The internal evaluation does NOT need to be submitted to the WYPDES Program as part of this application. By completing item 10b and signing this application, the permittee certifies that the reservoirs at this facility are capable of meeting the containment abilities which have been provided. The WYPDES Program will use the information provided above to determine the appropriate reservoir containment requirements that will be established in the permit. If reservoir containment requirements established in the permit are not met, this may constitute a violation of the permit, which is subject to full enforcement by the WYPDES Program.

11. Attach a description and a clear, legible, detailed topographic map of the discharging facility. Include the

following: a. A legend b. Well locations c. Ponds – Not applicable. There are no ponds used in the water management strategy of this facility. d. Reservoirs – Not applicable. There are no reservoirs used in the water management strategy of this

facility. e. Stock tanks – Not applicable. There are no stock tanks used in the water management strategy of this

facility. f. Discharge points (outfalls) g. Immediate receiving streams h. Water quality monitoring stations – Not applicable. WQMS are not required within Belle Fourche

watershed. i. Irrigation monitoring points – Not applicable within the Belle Fourche watershed. Effluent limits,

protective of irrigation, will be met at the end of pipe. j. Location of nearest downstream irrigator – Not applicable within the Belle Fourche watershed. Effluent

limits, protective of irrigation, will be met at the end of pipe. k. Section, Township, and Range information l. If proposing to use class 4C off-channel pits (option 1A), include footprint outline of the proposed pits. To

denote setback distance, include a distance marker from closest side of pit to the nearest water feature, floodplain, or stream alluvium. Identify latitude and longitude in decimal degrees (using a minimum of 6 decimal places) for each end point of the setback distance marker. – Not applicable. This is an Option 2 facility.

m. If proposing discharge to a headwater reservoir or to a playa lake (option 1B), include footprint outline of the proposed impoundment(s). See page 1 of the application form for option 1B impoundment siting




requirements. To denote setback distance from alluvial floodplain areas, include a distance marker from closest side of the impoundment to the nearest floodplain, or stream alluvium. Identify latitude and longitude in decimal degrees (using a minimum of 6 decimal places) for each end point of the setback distance marker.

Not applicable. This is an Option 2 facility.

All other requirements listed in question 11 are included on the facility map.

12. Describe the control measures that will be implemented to prevent significant damage to or erosion of the receiving water channel at the point of discharge.

Produced water will be discharged through a vertical, large diameter riser pipe and allowed to flow down the side of the corrugated pipe to dissipate energy. The discharged water will pass over rip-rap or scoria placed at a gentle slope prior to entering the receiving stream.

13. Describe the control measures that will be implemented to achieve water quality standards and effluent limits. If

proposing to utilize a treatment process, provide a description of the treatment process.

The construction noted in the response to question 12 will aid in the oxidation of metals such as iron, and will in turn enhance the precipitation of metal oxides on the rip-rap or scoria.

14. Outfall locations must be established as part of a preliminary field reconnaissance survey using GPS or

conventional survey equipment and documented in Table 1. Please document the type of equipment used, the expected accuracy of your measurements, and a brief rationale for locating the outfalls at the requested sites below.

A Garmin hand-held GPS unit was used to determine the site coordinates. Generally, it is accurate to plus or minus 60 feet. The outfalls are located in proximity to the well field and where the landowner wants the water for the beneficial use of livestock.

15. Complete the attached Table 1. Provide all the information requested in the table for each proposed discharge

point or monitoring point. If proposing changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the desired changes on the table. Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided. Option 2 permits, except those located in the Belle Fourche or Cheyenne River Basins, must include water quality monitoring station locations. Option 1B headwater reservoir discharges (reservoirs other than playa lakes capable of 50 year, 24 hour stormwater runoff containment) must include flow monitoring station locations. Option 1A and 1B permits must include containment unit monitoring station locations. Information related to reservoirs is only required if the facility’s water management plan includes reservoir containment.

Please see attached Tables 1A & 1B: Outfall Information. 16. Complete the attached Table 2. Provide all the information requested in the table for each well associated with

this proposed discharge authorization. If proposing changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the desired changes on the table. Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided.

Please see attached Table 2: Well Information. 17. Complete the attached Table 3. Provide all the information requested in the table for each reservoir proposed for

containment of CBM produced water. Specified locations refer to the approximate center of the reservoir. If proposing changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the desired changes on the table. Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided. Information related to reservoirs is only required if the facility’s water management plan includes reservoir containment.

Please see attached Table 3: Reservoir Information.




18. Complete the attached Table 4. Provide all information requested in the table related to reservoir bonding

requirements for each reservoir proposed for the containment of CBM produced water. If proposing any changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the desired changes on the table. Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided. Information related to reservoirs is only required if the facility’s water management plan includes reservoir containment.

Please see attached Table 4: Bonding Information.

19. Provide the results of water analyses for a sample collected from a location representative of the quality of the

water being proposed for discharge for all of the chemical parameters listed in the table below. The sample must be collected from well(s) or outfall(s) within a twenty mile radius of the proposed facility’s location, and from the same coal formation(s) and the same approximate depth(s) as proposed in this application. If filing an application for a permit renewal or modification, the representative sample must be collected from the facility being proposed for renewal or modification. Explain why this sample is representative of the produced water to be discharged.

The enclosed water quality analysis is from outfall WY0050814-018. The outfall is 4 miles east of this

facility and produces water from the Big George coal seam. The total recoverable aluminum in the analysis is <50 ug/L. It is assumed that this sample would be below the dissolved aluminum limits as well.

Sample ID Sample Date

QTR /

QTR SEC TWP

(N) RNG (W) Coal Seam

DP_WY0050814_018_TP 2/21/2006 SESW 18 44 74 Big George

Samples from co-mingled coal seams are acceptable as long as the sample(s) meet the following criteria:

A. all of the coal seams being proposed for development are represented in the co-mingled sample, with no contribution from coal seams not being proposed for development at the new facility.

B. the ratio of each coal seam’s contribution is approximately the same in the sample and the proposed development,

C. documentation is provided to verify the criteria listed in A. and B.

The analyses must be conducted in accordance with approved EPA test procedures (40 CFR Part 136). Include a signed copy of your lab report that includes the following:

a. detection limits b. results of each of the chemical parameters at the chemical state given below c. quarter/quarter, section, township and range of the sample collection location d. Time and date of sample collection e. Time and date of analysis for each parameter f. Analyst’s initials for each parameter g. Detection limit for each parameter as achieved by the laboratory h. WYPDES permit number and outfall number, where the sample was collected. i. Origin of produced water (coal seam and legal location of sample collection location)

If more than one coal seam is being proposed for development, the permittee must submit a lab analysis and complete information characterizing water quality from each coal seam being proposed for development. If the permittee is proposing to include discharges from a coal seam not previously developed at this facility, the permittee must submit a lab analysis and complete information characterizing water quality from the new coal seam being proposed for development. A mixing analysis may be required if the representative water quality




analysis from the new coal seam indicates that the inclusion of the new effluent source may result in degradation of existing effluent quality. Analyses must be provided in the units listed below.

Parameter* (See notes following the table on chemical states)

Required Detection Limits and Required Units

Alkalinity, Total 1 mg/l as CaCO3 Aluminum, Dissolved 50 μg/l Arsenic, Total Recoverable 1 μg/l Barium, Total Recoverable 100 μg/l Bicarbonate 10 mg/l Cadmium, Dissolved 5 μg/l Calcium, Dissolved 50 μg/l, report as mg/l Chlorides 5 mg/l Copper, Dissolved 10 μg/l Dissolved Solids, Total 5 mg/l Fluoride, Dissolved 100 µg/l Hardness, Total 10 mg/l as CaCO3

Iron, Dissolved 50 μg/l Lead, Dissolved 2 μg/l Magnesium, Dissolved 100 μg/l, report as mg/l Manganese, Dissolved 50 μg/l Mercury, Dissolved 1 μg/l pH to 0.1 pH unit Radium 226, Total Recoverable 0.2 pCi/l

Radium 228, Total Recoverable** 0.2 pCi/l

Selenium, Total Recoverable 5 μg/l Sodium Adsorption Ratio Calculated as unadjusted ratio Sodium, Dissolved 100 μg/l, report as mg/l Specific Conductance 5 micromhos/cm Sulfates 10 mg/l Zinc, Dissolved 50 μg/l

*Discharges into drainages other than the Powder River geologic basin may require analysis of additional parameters, please contact the WDEQ for a separate list.

**This parameter is only required for those discharges located within one stream mile of a class 2 water.

20. For new facilities, provide the expected (estimated) flow volume from each well in gallons per day, and provide the rationale behind the flow volume estimate. For existing facilities, provide actual flow data from all wells within the last six months.

Flow: There is no reported flow for this facility as the outfall has not been constructed.

Rational: Not applicable. There is no reported flow for this facility as the outfall has not been constructed. 21. For applications for new facilities, are any of the required chemical constituents in the laboratory analysis present

in concentrations above Wyoming Water Quality Standards?




YES NO Not applicable. This is an existing facility.

If the answer to question # 21 is yes, answer 21.a. – 21.b below. If no, proceed to question 23.

a. Which constituents?

b. Has this constituent been addressed in the response to question 13? 22. For applications for existing facilities, has the facility ever exceeded permit limits or water quality standards? If

the facility has never discharged or has not yet been constructed, please indicate below.

YES NO

There is no reported flow for this facility as the outfall has not been constructed.

If the answer to question 22 is yes, answer 22.a. – 22.c. If no, proceed to question 23.

a. Which constituents? Not applicable. b. Has the exceedance been addressed? Not applicable.

c. Describe how the exceedance was addressed. Not applicable.

23. Is there active irrigation in the drainage downstream of the discharge? (Please note that this response includes

both artificially and naturally irrigated bottomlands as defined in the Draft Agricultural Use Protection Policy for the interpretation and implementation of Chapter 1, Section 20 of the Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulation ).

YES NO

There is no downstream irrigation between the outfall and the mainstem.

If yes, at a minimum, the WYPDES Program requires submission of the following information:

1. Location(s) of irrigation diversions and/or sub-irrigated acreage; 2. Type(s) of Crops grown under irrigation; 3. Description of Irrigation Practices 4. A topographic map showing irrigated acreage, any structures, ownership of irrigated acreage. In addition to the minimum information described above, the WYPDES Program may require additional information should the permittee request site-specific effluent limits protective of irrigation uses. Contact the WYPDES Program for more information regarding requirements for site-specific SAR, TDS, and EC limits.

24. Provide name(s) and address(es) for all downstream irrigators between the outfalls and the mainstem.

Not applicable. There are no downstream irrigators.

25. Provide a listing of all active permits or construction approvals received or applied for by the applicant for the site described in this permit application in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 5.T. of the Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations.

• Please see attached Table 2 for a complete list of WOGCC API numbers that are associated with this facility.




Desired ChangesDischarge

Point (Outfalls) #

ImmediateReceiving

Stream

Mainstem(closest

perennialwater)

Distance to Closest 2AB Channel &

Mainstem (Miles)

Qtr/Qtr Sec Twn(N)

Rng (W)

NAD 83Latitude

NAD 83Longitude County Reservoir

Name and Type

RemoveReservoir 001 Mud Springs Creek Belle Fourche River 18.15 NENW 21 44 75 43.780544 -105.878945 Campbell 21-21

(Option 2)

– 001 Mud Springs Creek Belle Fourche River 18.15 NENW 21 44 75 43.780544 -105.878945 Campbell –

Please note that not all station types may be applicable for a particular facility. Additional spaces may be added if necessary. Use the format provided. Please denote reservoir type(s) - on channel, off-channel, playa, headwater Option 1B - in the appropriate column. Please note that reservoir information is not required if reservoir containment is not part of the facility's water management plan - for instance, information about existing "incidental" downstream reservoirs is not required. Please use North American Datum 1983 (NAD83) when reporting latitudes and longitudes.

Table 1A: Outfall Information Changes - WY0054765 - Savageton Divide




Discharge Point (Outfalls) #

ImmediateReceiving

Stream

Mainstem(closest

perennialwater)

Distance to Closest 2AB Channel &

Mainstem (Miles)

Qtr/Qtr Sec Twn(N)

Rng (W)

NAD 83Latitude

NAD 83Longitude County Reservoir

Name and Type

001 Mud Springs Creek Belle Fourche River 18.15 NENW 21 44 75 43.780544 -105.878945 Campbell –

Please note that not all station types may be applicable for a particular facility. Additional spaces may be added if necessary. Use the format provided. Please denote reservoir type(s) - on channel, off-channel, playa, headwater Option 1B - in the appropriate column. Please note that reservoir information is not required if reservoir containment is not part of the facility's water management plan - for instance, information about existing "incidental" downstream reservoirs is not required.

Table 1B: Outfall Information as Proposed - WY0054765 - Savageton Divide




Change Well Name API Number Coal Seam WellDepth

Location (QQ, Section, Township,

Range)

Discharges toOutfall #*

Remove Hartzog Federal 14-6-4475BG 49-005-55780 Big George 1690 SWSW 6-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 12-7-4475 49-005-59385 Big George 1925 SWNW 7-44-75 AWAO- T Chair 14-7-4475BG 49-005-54701 Big George 1811 SWSW 7-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 21-7-4475 49-005-59502 Big George 1900 NENW 7-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 23-7-4475 49-005-59386 Big George 2080 NESW 7-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 34-7-4475BG 49-005-56918 Big George 1850 SWSE 7-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 43-7-4475 49-005-59387 Big George 1875 NESE 7-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 14-8-4475BG 49-005-56919 Big George 1804 SWSW 8-44-75 AWAO- State 14-16-4475 49-005-53157 Big George 1567 SWSW 16-44-75 AWAO- State 23-16-4475 49-005-57397 Big George 1469 NESW 16-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 12-17-4475BG 49-005-56046 Big George 1775 SWNW 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 14-17-4475BG 49-005-56045 Big George 1760 SWSW 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 21-17-4475BG 49-005-53781 Big George 1941 NENW 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 23-17-4475BG 49-005-56044 Big George 1948 NESW 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 32-17-4475BG 49-005-53787 Big George 1976 SWNE 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 34-17-4475BG 49-005-56043 Big George 1850 SWSE 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 41-17-4475BG 49-005-53790 Big George 1949 NENE 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 43-17-4475 49-005-53814 Big George 2056 NESE 17-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 12-18-4475BG 49-005-53777 Big George 1815 SWNW 18-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 14-18-4475BG 49-005-53779 Big George 1749 SWSW 18-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 21-18-4475BG 49-005-53782 Big George 1980 NENW 18-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 23-18-4475BG 49-005-53785 Big George 1813 NESW 18-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 32-18-4475BG 49-005-53788 Big George 1891 SWNE 18-44-75 AWAO- T Chair Fed 34-18-4475BG 49-005-53789 Big George 1740 SWSE 18-44-75 AWAO- Savageton Fed 41-18-4475BG 49-005-53791 Big George 1830 NENE 18-44-75 AWAO- T-Chair Ranch 43-18-4475 49-005-50246 Big George 1610 NESE 18-44-75 AWAO

Table 2 - Well Information: WY0054765 - Savageton Divide

*AWAO - All wells are permitted to discharge to all outfalls

Total Number of Wells: 25




Qtr/Qtr Sec Twn

(N)Rng(W)

NAD 83Latitude

NAD 83Longitude

Remove 21-21 18.71 P17971S Not Available NENW 21 44 75 43.780665 -105.875815

Table 3 - Reservoir Information: WY0054765 - Savageton Divide

*Geographic location for on-channel impoundments represents the approximate of Center of Dam - Center of Channel. Location for off-channel impoundments represents the approximate center of the impoundment.

Desired Changes Reservoir Name

ReservoirStorageVolume

(acre/feet)

SEO Permit # SEO Reservoir RequirementsLocation Geographic Location*




Desired Changes

Reservoir Name

Reservoir Bonding Authority

Reservoir Reclamation Volume* less

than 5000 cubic yards?

Reservoir Reclamation

Volume* between 5000 and 10,000

cubic yards

Reservoir Reclamation

Volume* greater than 10,000 cubic

yards

Reservoir constructed/ upgraded**

prior to September 1, 2005

Bond Currently

posted with bonding

authority?

Remove 21-21 BLM X Unknown Yes

** Reservoir constructed/upgraded information relates to the September 2005 memo in which topsoil stockpiling is required for the new construction or the upgrade of an existing reservoir, as defined by embankment enlargement or spillway excavation. The installation of a drainpipe does not require topsoil stockpiling.

A Yes response in this column represents that the reservoir has been constructed prior to September 2005, or a reservoir constructed before September 2005 that needs an upgrade that does not require the stockpiling of topsoil, e.g., drainpipe installation.

A No response in this column represents that the reservoir is not constructed, the reservoir requires upgrades which will require topsoil stockpiling on site, or the reservoir was constructed after September 1, 2005.

Table 4 - Bonding Information: WY0054765 - Savageton Divide

Please check only one "reservoir reclamation volume" box for each reservoir

* Reservoir Reclamation Volume is the volume of the reservoir embankment with topsoil. The reservoir may have been created by an embankment that is either a cross valley/draw fill or an excavation with the embankment on 3 or 4 sides. During reclamation, the embankment is usually placed in the location where earth was borrowed to create the embankment.

Please note that reservoir information is not required if reservoir containment is not part of the facility's water management plan - for instance, information about existing incidental downstream reservoirs is not required.




LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

Site Name: Savageton_Prospect_1_2_and_3

Client Sample ID: DP_WY0050814_018_TPCollection Date: 02/21/06 10:00

Matrix: Aqueous

Client: Lance Oil and Gas

Lab ID: G06020400-001

Report Date: 03/06/06

Date Received: 02/21/06Location: SESW_18_44N_74W Sampled By: Lesley RothSamp FRQ/Type: IN_A_S1

Project: WYPDES

Tracking Number: 68905

Revised Date: 05/28/09

ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. * 400 W Boxelder Rd * Gillette, WY 82718-5315Toll Free 866.686.7175 * 307.686.7175 * FAX 307.682.4625 * [email protected]

Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL MethodQualifier Result Units

FIELD PARAMETERS02/21/06 10:00 / ***s.u.pH, field FIELD7.37 0.01

*** Performed by Sampler

MAJOR IONS, DISSOLVED02/22/06 16:23 / mlimg/LBicarbonate as HCO3 A2320 B19.71200 5 meq/L02/23/06 01:14 / mlimg/LChloride E300.00.176 1 meq/L02/23/06 01:14 / mlimg/LFluoride E300.00.040.7 0.1 meq/L02/23/06 01:14 / mlimg/LSulfate E300.00.021 1 meq/L02/24/06 03:55 / eli-bmg/LCalcium E200.72.9459 1 meq/L02/24/06 03:55 / eli-bmg/LMagnesium E200.71.3316 1 meq/L02/24/06 03:55 / eli-bmg/LSodium E200.713.8318 1 meq/L

METALS, DISSOLVED02/24/06 06:40 / eli-bug/LCadmium E200.8ND 0.102/24/06 06:40 / eli-bug/LCopper E200.83 102/24/06 03:55 / eli-bug/LIron E200.7259 3002/27/06 19:21 / eli-bug/LLead E200.8ND 202/24/06 03:55 / eli-bug/LManganese E200.765 1002/24/06 06:40 / eli-bug/LMercury E200.8ND 0.0602/24/06 06:40 / eli-bug/LZinc E200.811 10

METALS, TOTAL02/24/06 06:45 / eli-bug/LBarium E200.71160 100

METALS, TOTAL RECOVERABLE02/25/06 03:20 / eli-bug/LAluminum E200.8ND 5002/25/06 03:20 / eli-bug/LArsenic E200.80.6 0.102/25/06 03:20 / eli-bug/LSelenium E200.8ND 5

NON-METALS02/22/06 16:23 / mlimg/LAlkalinity, Total as CaCO3 A2320 B985 502/21/06 17:29 / daaumhos/cmConductivity @ 25 C A2510 B1640 103/01/06 14:02 / tlcmg/LHardness as CaCO3 A2340 B210 1003/01/06 14:03 / tlcunitlessSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) Calculation9.5 0.102/22/06 10:56 / mlimg/LSolids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C A2540 C1040 20

RADIONUCLIDES - TOTAL02/23/06 14:50 / eli-cpCi/LRadium 226 E903.0M0.4 0.202/23/06 14:50 / eli-cpCi/LRadium 226 precision (±) E903.0M0.2

ReportDefinitions:

RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level.QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit.




Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

Ç*

#°

97 8

61 42 5

16

2119

32

18

35

20

3336

1714

11

24

3431

23

13

12

State 23-16-4475

State 14-16-4475

T Chair 14-7-4475BG

Savageton Fed 23-7-4475




Savageton Fed 43-17-4475T-Chair Ranch 43-18-4475

T Chair Fed 34-18-4475BG

Savageton Fed 14-8-4475BGSavageton Fed 34-7-4475BG

Savageton Fed 41-18-4475BG













Van

Bug

genu

m R

d/Christense

n Rd

001

424000

424000

425000

425000

426000

426000

427000

427000

428000

428000

429000

429000

430000

430000

4848

000

4848

000

4849

000

4849

000

4850

000

4850

000

4851

000

4851

000

4852

000

4852

000

4853

000

4853

000

InterTech E&E, [email protected]

O:\LAR-GIS\Projects\Lance\Savageton_Divide\Projects\WY0054765_PR_20090430.mxd

Savageton DivideWYPDES

Permit Renewal WY0054765

HUC 10 - 1012020101

April 30, 2009

Ç*Ç*

Ç*

Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*

Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç*

Ç*Ç*Ç*Ç* Ç*

#°

Mud Springs Creek

Belle Fourche River

0 0.5 1

Miles

Ü1:24,000

Explanation

#° Outfall - Not Constructed

Ç* CBM Well - Federal

Ç* CBM Well - Fee

Ç* CBM Well - State

County Road

R74W | R73W

T45NT44N

Belle Fourche River-Mud Spring CreekHUC - 1012020101

DetailBoundary

R76W R75W

T45NT44N

R75W | R74WR76W | R75W

T44NT43N

Discharge Point

(Outfalls) #

Immediate

Receiving

Stream

Mainstem

(closest

perennial

water)

Distance to

Closest 2AB

Channel &

Mainstem (Miles)

Qtr/Qtr SecTwn

(N)

Rng

(W)

NAD 83

Latitude

NAD 83

LongitudeCounty

Reservoir

Name and Type

001 Mud Springs Creek Belle Fourche River 18.15 NENW 21 44 75 43.780544 -105.878945 Campbell –

Please note that not all station types may be applicable for a particular facility. Additional spaces may be added if necessary. Use the format provided. Please denote reservoir type(s) - on

channel, off-channel, playa, headwater Option 1B - in the appropriate column. Please note that reservoir information is not required if reservoir containment is not part of the facility's water

management plan - for instance, information about existing "incidental" downstream reservoirs is not required.

Table 1B: Outfall Information as Proposed - WY0054765 - Savageton Divide

Documents

InterTech Environmental & Engineering, LLC A CBMA Inc. …deq.state.wy.us/wqd/WYPDES_Permitting/WYPDES_PNs_and_appr... · 2009-07-13 · InterTech Environmental & Engineering, LLC