Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Interpreting iron speciation and bioavailabilityin the marine environment
from microbial genetics
Kathy Barbeau1,
Shane Hogle1, Kelly Roe 3, Brian Hopkinson2, Bianca Brahamsha1
1Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego2University of Georgia Marine Sciences Department
3Colorado School of Mines
• Iron availability is a potent control onmarine phytoplankton and bacterioplanktonproductivity
• Availability of iron to marine microbiotais mediated not just by supply, but byin situ iron chemistry
Chemical forms of iron in seawater
soluble species colloids particulates
1nm 10nm 0.1μm 1μm 10μm 100μm
inorganicFe(III) - Fe(OH)2+
Fe(OH)30Fe(OH)4-
inorganicFe(II) - Fe2+
FeCO30
N
O
C
O
(CH2)2
CONH(CH2)5
C
O
(CH2)2
CONH(CH2)5
N
O
C
O
CH3N
O
(H2C)5H2N
FeIII
Fe
N
N
NN
COO-
COO-
Fe(III)HO
HO
OH
OHFe(III)
OH 2+
OH
iron oxide mineral
organic detritus
How do we address the chemical complexity of iron in seawater?
● Mass spectrometry techniques
● Advanced separation techniques
● Electrochemical techniques
This is challenging!
What can be gained from characterizingthe Fe transporter pool?
A “biologically informed” approach to chemistry
What can be gained from characterizingthe Fe transporter pool?
Model marine organisms● Growth studies● Genomics● Transcriptomics● Gene Knockouts
Natural populations● - omics studies
A “biologically informed” approach to chemistry
Iron uptake systems in marine bacteria
• Most of what is known about Fe transport comes fromstudies with model pathogenic bacteria
Do we actually find these archetypal iron transporters in all marine bacteria?
First look: genome/metagenome survey- Hopkinson and Barbeau EMI 2012- Toulza et al. PLOS One 2012- Desai et al. Front. Microbiol 2012
Iron transporters in marine prokaryotic genomes
Hopkinson and Barbeau EMI 2012
Iron uptake genes in the GOS metagenomes
Hopkinson & Barbeau EMI 2012
Molecular mechanisms underlying microbial Fe acquisition in the marine environment:
A focus on transport of the model Fe-binding ligand heme
Honey et al. MEPS 2013; Gledhill Mar. Chem. 2007; Vong et al. ACA 2007
Syn WH7805
Prochlorococcus
Syn RS9917
Robiginitalea
Polaribacter 23P
Tenacibaculum
Photo SKA34Photo prof3TCKPhoto profSS9
Silici pom
Phylogenetic distribution of heme transport
Hopkinson et al. AEM 2008
Heme uptake genes in marine roseobacters
Roe et al. AEM in press
Roe et al. AEM in press
Roe et al. AEM in press
Work with roseobacter isolates
Roe et al. AEM in press
Roe et al. AEM in press
X
Functional characterization of“heme” TBDT via knockoutmutation
Comparative analysis of metal uptake systems in marine Roseobacter genomes
Roseo TBDT phylogeny appears to be structured by putative substrate
Does the sequence diversity of metal uptake receptors reflect substrate diversity in the environment?
e.g. – diversity of Fe-ligand complexes, and physico-chemical forms of Fe
Does the sequence diversity of metal uptake receptors reflect substrate diversity in the environment?
e.g. – diversity of Fe-ligand complexes, and physico-chemical forms of Fe
Increase understanding at the molecular level
Improve annotation capabilities for marine -omics studies
Acknowledgements
Funding provided by: NSF Chemical Oceanography
Thanks to: Shane HogleKelly RoeBrian HopkinsonDorothy ParkerBianca BrahamshaChris Dupont