11
Interpreting Hamlet

Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Interpreting Hamlet

Page 2: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Common Critical Interpretations

• Religious• Historical/Political• Psychological/Freud• Linguistic/Rhetorical• Feminist• Philosophical

Page 3: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

MOTIFS

Page 4: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Hamlet Prompt

Identify a common motif from the play, and analyze how this motif develops an important universal theme of the play or how it develops a theme particular to its culture and time.

Page 5: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

MOTIF and THEME

Connect your MOTIF to an important UNIVERSAL THEME.

EARS to CORRUPTIONINCEST To CORRUPTION

STAGE/ACTING to PURPOSE OF REVENGE STAGE/ACTING to MEANING OF LIFE

MADNESS to UNCERTAINTY OF TRUTHGARDEN/WEEDS to FALL OF HUMANKIND

LANGUAGE/RHETORIC to UNCERTAINTY OF TRUTH

Page 6: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Literary Analysis: Introductory Paragraph

1)Universality of Shakespeare’s Hamlet2)Introduction to the specific motif3)Brief introduction to the play4)Purpose of the motif in the play5)THESIS: Universal message of the motif in the

play

Page 7: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

INTRO and THESIS STATMENT

Through the layering of literary motifs and his profound exploration of themes, William Shakespeare’s plays evoke an understanding of humanity that extends beyond his own time period of Renaissance England. In his play Hamlet, Shakespeare’s subtle use of the motif of ears demonstrates this depth of understanding. Whether being used literally or figuratively, there are over 20 references to ears. These references parallel the eavesdropping, deceit, manipulation, and corruption that develop as Shakespeare’s tragic hero, Hamlet, is haunted by the ghost of his dead father. Distortion of the truth, spread through ears, and manipulation of people, due to spying and eavesdropping, lead Hamlet to a philosophical paralysis in trying to determine what the just response is to an injustice. Set in the kingdom of Elsinore, Denmark, during Medieval times, the play takes shape in a specific historical and political milieu; however, Shakespeare’s message, developed through the multiple references to ears, goes beyond this limited time and place to illustrate how corruption, driven by the greed for power and the temptation of lust, has plagued humanity throughout history.

1

2

3

4

5

Page 8: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Literary Analysis: Body Paragraph

1) Topic sentence: point about the motif2) Quote lead-in / Context3) Quote to demonstrate the motif with citation4) Quote explanation5) Analysis of how the motif functions in the quote6) Analysis of the universal meaning of the motif

Page 9: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Body ParagraphThe connection between the literal and figurative references to ears suggests how corruption works through the body to reach the spirit and also demonstrates the relationship between a King’s character and the health of his kingdom. In Act I Scene 5 the late King Hamlet comes back as a ghost to warn Hamlet of Claudius’ treachery. "Now, Hamlet, hear: 'Tis given out, that sleeping in mine orchard, A serpent stung me; so the whole ear of Denmark is by a forged process of my death Rankly abus'd;" (I.5.34-38). The Ghost tells Hamlet that it was believed that he (King Hamlet) was bitten by a snake and died; however, he reveals the true course of events: “Sleeping within mine orchard, My custom always of the afternoon, Upon my secure hour thy uncle stole, With juice of cursed hebona in a vial, And in the porches of mine ears did pour The leperous distilment;" (I.5.59-64). Claudius murdered King Hamlet by pouring poison into his ear, and because of this, the whole “ear” of Denmark is poisoned. Claudius, instigated by his greed for power and lust for the Queen, deceives the people of Denmark and assumes the crown, thus ensuring corruption for the future of Elsinore. The physical poisoning through the ear leads to the figurative consequences of a deceived public. The ear emphasizes the path that the corruption takes as it first tempts and takes over the physical body, but eventually spreads to destroy the entire the kingdom. As Lord Acton famously said in 1887, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Shakespeare’s portrayal of the corruption in Elsinore mirrors the concerns of his own time as the reign of Queen Elizabeth was coming to an end, and the determination of succession to the throne was uncertain. Although Hamlet may speak of the specific political fears of his time, Shakespeare’s universal message applies to any period of political instability when corrupt leaders destroy the nation that they lead through the very deception of their rise to power.

1

23423

4

5

6

Page 10: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Literary Analysis: Concluding Paragraph

1) Restate the motif and its purpose2) Synthesize the most persuasive examples3) Analyze how the motif develops the universal

message4) Suggest a significance to the audience

Page 11: Interpreting Hamlet. Common Critical Interpretations Religious Historical/Political Psychological/Freud Linguistic/Rhetorical Feminist Philosophical

Concluding ParagraphShakespeare hints at the corruptibility of humankind through his references to

ears as the symbol of how we perceive information, thus how we can be deceived through false appearances, treachery, and betrayal. The conflict of the play stems from the treachery of the poisoning of King Hamlet through the ear, which mirrors Claudius’ poisoning of the State of Denmark through his assumption of the crown. The reference to Claudius’ “mildew’d ear” in contrast to King Hamlet’s virtue reflects the downfall of this once great kingdom, as the “ear of Denmark” has been misled by this power-hungry and manipulative ruler. Hamlet recognizes the “foolish ear” of the gullible masses who fall for the false appearances of corruption and, as a result, contribute to their own self-destruction. Thus, the ear does not equal corruption; the ear equals human corruptibility. Shakespeare addresses the conscience of the public to question authority, false appearances, and the ethical backbone of our leaders. While Hamlet is paralyzed by the corruption of Denmark’s particular political situation, Shakespeare turns the question to readers to answer for our own times. Corrupt leaders will always find ways to manipulate the truth to their own advantage, and it is up to the conscience of the people to challenge and expose the corruption for what it is.