42
 T raquair difined the visual field a s the island of vision surrounded by the sea of darkness  Axis X, Y (parallel to the sea level)  Axis Z (perpendicular to the sea level)

Interpretation of Humphrey

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 1/42

 Traquair difined the visual field as the “island of vision

surrounded by the sea of darkness” 

• Axis X, Y(parallel to the

sea level)

• Axis Z

(perpendicular

to the sea level)

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 2/42

The visualfield is

measured in

two ways• Kinetic and

Static

perimetry

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 3/42

The visual field is plotted as the

patient sees it

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 4/42

Units of light intensity

• The light intensity expressed in

apostilb (asb) or decibel (dB) units• Retinal sensitivity expressed in

decibel

• As the dB value is decreasing,the light intensity is increasing

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 5/42

 

As the dB value is decreasing,

the light intensity is increasing

In Humphrey Field Analyzer

• 0 dB no attenuation =10.000 asb

• 10 dB is 1/10 x 10.000 = 1.000 asb

• 20 dB is 1/102 x 10.000 = 100 asb

30 dB is 1/10

3

x 10.000 = 10 asb• 40 dB is 1/104 x 10.000 = 1 asb 

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 6/42

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 7/42

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 8/42

Definition of threshold

Threshold sensitivity is defined as thestimulus intensity at which the patient

respond 50% of the time

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 9/42

2

24

4

Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 10/42

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 11/42

ANALYSIS OF VISUAL FIELD DATA

To understand and interpret the single

field printout it is divided in 8 zones

• Zone 1 : Patient and test data

Zone 2 : Reliability indices and foveal treshold• Zone 3 : Raw data

• Zone 4 : Gray scale

• Zone 5 : Total deviation plot

• Zone 6 : Pattern deviation plot• Zone 7 : Global indices

• Zone 8 : Glaucoma hemi field test (GHT)(Gupta AK,et al,2007)

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 12/42

Zone 1 : Patient and Test Data

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 13/42

Zone 1 : Patient and Test Data

Patient name and identity number• Age and date of birth

 – Wrong patients’ age can alter results of field test 

Eye tested• Visual acuity and refractive correction used

• Pupillary size

 – Pupillary size should remain constant in follow upfields

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 14/42

The test data has the following information

• Test pattern and strategy performed.

• Fixation monitor (Blind spot) *

• Stimulus size : Goldmann size III• Background illumination : It is a constant at 31.5

asb. *

•Color of the stimulus : White *

• Fixation target

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 15/42

 Zone 2 : Reliability parameter and foveal threshold

Reliability parameter

Unreliable ….XX 

Patient Fixation………… > 20%

False Positive errors… > 33% 

False negative errors… > 33%

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 16/42

Zone 2 : Reliability parameter and foveal threshold 

False positive > 33%gray scale : white scotomaGHT : abnormaly high sensitivity

False negative >33%lack of attentive, fatique, advance damage

Low patient reliability does not necessarilymean lack useful information

It is just that such field are not included in thedatabase, such field must be interpreted withmore caution.

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 17/42

Zone 3: Raw data

• Actual threshold value

• Even if all zones are

normal, but the

clinical picture are

very suspicious,

inspect zone 8.

One may pick up ascotoma

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 18/42

Zone 4: Gray scale

• Conversion of the raw datato gray tone symbols

• Do not make any diagnosis

on the basis of gray scale

• It give an impression anddraw attention to an area

• Useful to explain thecondition to the patient

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 19/42

 

Useful when there areGross False positive (white scotoma)

False negative error (clover leaf)

Explain the seriousness of the condition to the patient

Zone 4: Gray scale

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 20/42

Paracentral

Scotoma

Arcuate

Scotoma

Nasal StepTemporal

Wedge

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 21/42

Zone 5: Total deviation plot

numeric values

probability plot

symbols that indicate thestatistical significance of

each measured deviation

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 22/42

Zone 6: Pattern deviation plot

• Provided as numerical

and probability plot

• To expose localized

defect

• It adjust for any overall

sinking of hill of vision

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 23/42

Normal “Hill of vision” 

Zone 4: normal no depressed point

Zone 5: normal no depressed point

(courtesy of Prof. Ravi Thomas)

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 24/42

Generalized depression (cataract)

Zone 4: many depressed point

Zone 5: normal

No localized defect

(courtesy of Prof. Ravi Thomas)

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 25/42

Localized scotoma

There are depressed point in zone 4 that persist in zone 5

(courtesy of Prof. Ravi Thomas)

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 26/42

Zone 7: Global indices

• Each global index summarized andcharacterizes one aspect of the test as asingle value

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 27/42

Zone 7: Global indices

• MD (mean deviation)shows how much, on average, the whole field depart fromnormal

• PSD (Pattern Standard Deviation)reflects irregularities in the field caused by localizeddefects

• SF (Short term Fluctuation)is index of intra test variationSF is removed from PSD to produced CPSD (CorrectedPattern Standard Deviation)

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 28/42

Hoddap Classification

Early Glaucomatous Loss

a. MD > -6 dB

b. Fewer than 18 points depressed below

the 5% probability level and fewer than

10 points below the p<1% level

c. No point in the central 5 degrees with

a sensitivity of less than 15 dB

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 29/42

Moderate Glaucomatous Loss

a. -6>MD > -12 dB

b. Fewer than 37 points depressed below the5% probability level and fewer than 20points below the p<1% level

c. No absolute deficit (0 dB) in the 5 central

degreesd. Only one hemifield with sensitivity of < 15

dB in the 5 central degrees

Hoddap Classification

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 30/42

Advanced Glaucomatous Loss

a. MD < -12 dB

b. More than 37 points depressed below the5% probability level or more than 20points below the p<1% level

c. Absolute deficity (0 dB) in the 5 central

degreesd. Sensitivity < 15 dB in the 5 central degrees

in both hemifields

Hoddap Classification

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 31/42

Zone 8: Glaucoma Hemifield Test

Five possible message of GHT

• Outside normal limit

Borderline• General reduction of sensitivity

• Abnormally high sensitivity

• Within normal limits

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 32/42

Zone 8: Glaucoma Hemifield Test

Five zones in the

upper field arecompared its

mirror-image in

the lower field

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 33/42

Early glaucoma: 

1.Pattern deviationprobability plot shows a

cluster of > 3 non-edgepoints with p< 5% andone points has p<1%.

2.PSD or CPSD with p< 5%

3.GHT outside normal limits 

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 34/42

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 35/42

FIGURE 1 :

HFA 30-2CONSTRICTED

FIELD

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 36/42

FIGURE 2 :HFA 30-2 of the

same patient as

in figure 1 withthe field

repeated with

an appropriatecontact lens

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 37/42

TRY TO INTERPRET THIS PRINTOUT...

CASE 1 Zone 1: entered correctly

Zone 2 : reliable field

false neg NA

Zone 3 : central islandZone 4 : all depressed point

Zone 5 : better than deviationplot

Zone 6 : MD and PSD flag asabnormal

GHT : outside normal limit

Advance field loss

Order for 10-2 and macula

program

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 38/42

The result of 10-2

CASE 1

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 39/42

CASE 2

Zone 1 and 2: OkZone 3 : arcuate defectZone 4 : depressed pointsuperiorlyZone 5 : arcuate scotomaZone 6: MD and PSDabnormalZone 7: GHT outside normallimits

It is consistent with typicalglaucomatous defect

Then correlate with fundusfinding

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 40/42

Inferiorretinochoroidcoloboma

Neverinterpret thefield alone!!

CASE 2

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 41/42

 Case 3

Zone 1: 30-2 program

Zone 2: reliable field

Zone 4: many depressed pointp<0.5%

Zone 5 : many depressed point

persist with p< 0.5% in arcuatearea

Zone 6 :MD and PSD flag asabnormal

Zone 7: GHT outside normal limit

This is a Juvenile OAG, posttrabeculectomy, IOP 12 mmHg,

cd 0.7

8/13/2019 Interpretation of Humphrey

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/interpretation-of-humphrey 42/42

THANK YOU