Upload
kalyca
View
47
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Interoperability AFCEA. Mr. Henrik DAM Chairman SWGI. NATO Unclassified. OUTLINE. Aim of the briefing Basics Background – how did we get here? Status of the Interoperability Initiative Implementation of the Policy and Strategy Conclusions. Aim of the briefing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NATO Unclassified
Mr. Henrik DAMMr. Henrik DAMChairman SWGIChairman SWGI
04/21/23 NATO Unclassified
NATO Unclassified 2
OUTLINEOUTLINE
• Aim of the briefing • Basics• Background – how did we get here?• Status of the Interoperability Initiative• Implementation of the Policy and Strategy• Conclusions
04/21/23
NATO Unclassified 3
Aim of the briefingAim of the briefing
• Set up the scene - NATO efforts in interoperability
• Trigger the discussion on what can be done better
• Provide thoughts on where NATO should focus more
04/21/23
NATO Unclassified 4
BASICS - InteroperabilityBASICS - InteroperabilityDefinition: Interoperability is the ability to act together coherently, effectively and efficiently to achieve Allied tactical, operational and strategic objectives.
04/21/23
Critical Steps:
- Definition of interoperability requirements
- Identification of interoperability solutions
- Implementation of identified solutions
- Test and validation of fielded solutions
Lack of interoperability reduces effectiveness and efficiency Lack of interoperability reduces effectiveness and efficiency of operations, wastes of operations, wastes resourcesresources, and can , and can cost livescost lives
NATO Unclassified 5
Tools for achieving Interoperability:
- Standardization- Standardization
- Training, Exercises, Education, Evaluation- Training, Exercises, Education, Evaluation
- Lessons learned- Lessons learned
- Cooperative programmes- Cooperative programmes
- Demonstrations, trials- Demonstrations, trials
BASICS BASICS (cont)(cont)
+/- 2,000 (active)
STANAG = Standardization AgreementSTANAG = Standardization AgreementAP =AP = Allied PublicationAllied Publication
NATO Unclassified 6
BackgroundBackground
• Interoperability is not a new topic at NATO – new new operational challengesoperational challenges
• Interoperability Initiative – Bucharest Summit 2008
• Identified Shortfalls: (responses to Questionnaire)– Ability to communicate– Ability to operate– Ability to support– Ability to train and exercise
• Action Plan:– Tasking from Defence Ministers to EWG
• Establishment of SWGI (Staff Working Group on Interoperability)04/21/23
NATO Unclassified 7
• Quick wins include: – Application of NATO agreed doctrine and procedures – Joint and multinational training – ISAF Pre-Deployment Training Programme – Improved language training and use of NATO terminology – FAC Interoperability
• Near-term (2 yrs.) concrete solutions through the Committee structure
• Long-term (integration of Interoperability in NATO defence and operations planning processes) – Policy ; Strategy ; Implementation of Policy & Strategy – Integration in NDPP and OPP – NDPP Capability Survey (145 STANAGs)(145 STANAGs)– Continuous review of STANAG implementation
Status of the Status of the Interoperability Initiative – Action Plan deliverablesInteroperability Initiative – Action Plan deliverables
04/21/23
NATO Unclassified 8
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY AND STRATEGYIMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY AND STRATEGY
04/21/23
StandardizationStandardizationStandardizationStandardization
Training, ExercisesTraining, ExercisesTraining, ExercisesTraining, Exercises
Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedLessons LearnedLessons Learned
Cooperative Cooperative ProgramsPrograms
Cooperative Cooperative ProgramsPrograms
Demos and TrialsDemos and TrialsDemos and TrialsDemos and Trials
Integration in Integration in NDPP and OPPNDPP and OPPIntegration in Integration in
NDPP and OPPNDPP and OPP
NATO Unclassified 9
ConclusionsConclusions• Need for bilateral/multilateral language training initiatives
• Need to establish closer linkage between National operational certification of forces prior to deployment and interoperability testing
• Possible better use of NATO common funds (eg. Afghan Mission Network), multinational and civil-military approaches to enhance interoperability
• Need for strengthening national commitment to information sharing (particularly on deployed operations) and lessons learned process
• Need for National commitments for time and resources to improve interoperability, most importantly implementation of agreed STANAGs
• Use all the possible formats and opportunities to advocate interoperability
04/21/23
NATO Unclassified 1004/21/23
Mr. Henrik DAMMr. Henrik DAMHead Joint Armaments and Industry SectionHead Joint Armaments and Industry Section
Chairman SWGIChairman SWGI