46
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition Joshua S. Goldstein Jon C. Pevehouse Chapter Five: International Conflict

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

  • Upload
    guy

  • View
    45

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition. Joshua S. Goldstein Jon C. Pevehouse. Chapter Five: International Conflict. Anti-Indian protester and Indian security forces in Kashmir, 2010. 5.1 The Wars of the World. Types of War Theories of the Causes of War. MyLab Media. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

INTERNATIONALRELATIONS2013–2014 UpdateTenth Edition

Joshua S. Goldstein Jon C. Pevehouse

Chapter Five: International Conflict

Page 2: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Anti-Indian protester and Indian security forces in Kashmir, 2010.

Page 3: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

5.1 The Wars of the World

Types of War

Theories of the Causes of War

Page 4: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

MyLab Media

Simulations: Conflict: You are a Strategic Analyst

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/long/long_mpsk_media_1/sims_2011/strategic_analyst/player.html

Please log into MyPoliSciLab with your usernameand password before accessing this link.

Page 5: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Types of War

HegemonicTotalLimitedRaids, low-intensity conflictCivilGuerrillaViolence of WarTransition from war to peace

Page 6: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition
Page 7: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Theories of the Causes of War

Individual level of analysis

Domestic level of analysis

Interstate level of analysis

Global level of analysis

Competing Theories on all levels of analysis

Page 8: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Once armed groups stop shooting, a long process of postwar transition ensues. Disarming and demobilizing militias is the most critical aspect of this transition, but also the most difficult because it leaves disarmed groups vulnerable. Here, a major armed group turns in weapons under an amnesty in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria, 2009.

GIVING UP THE GUNS

Page 9: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Political scientists do not agree on a theory of why great wars like World War II occur and cannot predict whether they could happen again. The city of Stalingrad (Volgograd) was decimated during Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union, 1943.

WHY WAR?

Page 10: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

5.1 The Wars of the WorldQ: The goal of which type of war is to force the surrender of the enemy’s government and replace it with one of the victor’s choosing?

A) Total

B) Limited

C) Guerrilla

D) Civil

Page 11: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Answer:

A) Total

Page 12: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

True-False:

A war over control of the rules of the international system as a whole is a hegemonic war.

Page 13: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Answer:

True

Page 14: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

5.2 Conflicts of IdeasNationalism

Ethnic Conflict

Genocide

Religious Conflict

Ideological Conflict

Page 15: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

MyLab Media

Video: The Iran-Iraq War

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/long/long_mpsk_vcs_1/vcs2_08_the_iran-iraq_war.html

Please log into MyPoliSciLab with your usernameand password before accessing this link.

Page 16: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Nationalism

Identity-based sources of international conflict

Nationalism

May be most important forces in world politics

Nation

Around 1500 countries began to bring entire nations together

Self-determination

Page 17: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Ethnic Conflict

Ethnic groups

In ethnic conflicts, there is often pressure to redraw borders by force.

When ethnic populations are minorities in territories controlled by rival ethnic groups, they may be driven from their land (ethnic cleansing) or systematically exterminated (genocide).

Causes of ethnic hostility

Page 18: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Ethnic conflicts play a role in many international conflicts. Ethnocentrism based on an in-group bias can promote intolerance and ultimately dehumanization of an out-group, as evidenced by genocides in Darfur (Sudan), Rwanda, and Bosnia; South African apartheid; the persecution of Jews and other minorities in Nazi Germany; and slavery in the United States. In 2008, after decades of peace and tolerance, Kenya erupted in bloody ethnic violence after a disputed presidential election. Here, a mob from one ethnic group attacks and drives away all members of a rival ethnic group from a formerly mixed town.

DRIVING OUT THE OUT-GROUP

Page 19: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition
Page 20: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

President of Liberia, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf

Page 21: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Genocide

In extreme cases, governments use genocide try to destroy scapegoated groups or political rivals.

Rwanda

Sudan

Page 22: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Religious Conflict

Religion is the core of the community’s value system in much of the world.

When overlaid on ethnic and territorial conflicts, religion often surfaces as the central and most visible division between groups.

There is nothing inherent in religion that mandates conflicts.

Fundamentalist movements

Islamist movements

Armed Islamist groups

Page 23: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Religious intolerance can exacerbate tensions between groups, sometimes increasing violence, with international implications. The most salient religious conflict today is between Shi’ite and Sunni branches of Islam, centered in Iran and Saudi Arabia. The split played out in devastating violence in Iraq around 2007 and now helps fuel the Syrian civil war (2013).

RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES

Page 24: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition
Page 25: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition
Page 26: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition
Page 27: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

In some Muslim-populated countries, Islam is a political rallying point—especially in authoritarian countries in which the mosque is a rare permissible gathering point. Islamist politicians are developing new models of government, mixing democracy and Islamic tradition, especially in the countries most affected by the Arab Spring protests, which frequently peaked after Friday prayers. Here, Egyptians pray during a Friday protest against the authoritarian president early in 2011.

THE POLITICS OF ISLAM

Page 28: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Ideological Conflict

Like religion, ideology symbolizes and intensifies conflicts between groups and states more than it causes them.

Revolutionary governments typically turn to the pursuit of national interests above ideological interests.

Ideologies can help to mobilize national populations to support a state in its international dealings.

Page 29: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Ideology plays only a limited role in most international conflicts. After revolutions, ideologies such as Marxism may affect foreign policy, but over the following decades, countries such as China or the Soviet Union typically revert to a foreign policy based more on national interests than ideology. Nonetheless, ideological clashes still occur, as between the freedom-loving United States and authoritarian North Korea. Here the different styles of the two countries are on display as the New York Philharmonic performs a rare concert in North Korea, 2008.

IDEOLOGICAL SPLIT

Page 30: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

5.2 Conflicts of IdeasQ: Ethnic groups do which of the following?

A) Share ancestral, language, cultural, or religious ties and a common identity

B) Want a state of their own

C) Have a state of their own

D) Resist ethnocentrism to keep tensions low

Page 31: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Answer:

A) Share ancestral, language, cultural, or religious ties and a common identity

Page 32: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

True-False:

A current example of ethnic conflict is the use of force by the Sri Lankan government against Tibetans.

Page 33: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Answer:

False

Page 34: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

5.3 Conflicts of Interest

Territorial Disputes

Control of Governments

Economic Conflict

Page 35: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Territorial Disputes

Conflicts about territory have special importance because of the territorial nature of the state

Border disputes

Means of controlling territory

Secession

Interstate borders

Lingering disputes

Page 36: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

South American leaders discuss trade, not war, in Argentina, 2010.

Page 37: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Efforts by a region to secede from a state are a frequent source of international conflict, but international norms generally treat such conflicts as internal matters unless they spill over borders. Increasingly, autonomy agreements are resolving secession conflicts. Here, a million and a half citizens in Barcelona demand independence from recession-wracked Spain for the region of Catalonia, 2012. Leaders of the region promise a referendum in 2014.

WE WANT OUT

Page 38: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition
Page 39: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Control of islands, and of the large exclusive economic zone (EEZ) that surrounds them under the law of the sea, has created a number of complicated interstate conflicts. Japan claims Okinotori, shown here in 2005, as an island with an EEZ, but China calls it merely a “rock” without surrounding economic rights.

LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION

Page 40: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Economic Conflict

Economic competition is the most pervasive form of conflict in IR

Economic transactions also contain strong element of mutual economic gain

Use of violence would for the most part interrupt and diminish profits

Economic conflicts do still bear on international securityDrug trafficking

Page 41: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Because drug trafficking crosses national borders and involves lots of guns and money, it is a source of interstate conflict. Afghanistan supplies most of the opium used to make heroin worldwide, and this illicit trade funds the Taliban in its fight against NATO and the Afghan government. Here, a poor Afghan farmer, dependent on opium poppies to make a living, checks his crop, 2007.

DRUG WARS

Page 42: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

5.3 Conflicts of InterestQ: Islam has played a role in many recent conflicts because it is __________.

A) inherently warlike

B) less peaceful than other religions

C) predominant in an area of the world where geographical and historical circumstances encourage conflict

D) moving into traditionally secular areas

Page 43: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Answer:

C) Predominant in an area of the world where geographical and historical circumstances encourage conflict

Page 44: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

True-False:

Because positive gains from economic activities are more effective inducements than negative threats of violence, economic conflicts lead to violence much less often.

Page 45: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Answer:

True

Page 46: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013–2014 Update Tenth Edition

Chapter Discussion Question

How does nationalism influence IR? Why do demands for statehood or for the adjustment of state borders so often lead to conflict? What role does ethnicity play in context of nationalism and conflict?