1
International Judicial Bodies Compulsory Jurisdiction Across the Globe Inter-State Judicial Bodies Note: Updated visualizations previously published in Alter, 2013 ITLOS WTO AB ICJ International Criminal Court States colored according to the acceptance of compulsory jurisdiction of one, two, or three international judicial bodies for inter-state disputes considered (ICJ, WTO AB, ITLOS) States not accepting compulsory jurisdiction of any of the three bodies considered States that have Statute of the ICC States that have not Statute of the ICC States that have Immunity Agreement with the United States Referral by ICC State Party Referral by UN Security Council Proprio Motu investigation by the ICC Situations that have been formally investigated by the ICC since its creation: Albania Andorra Bosnia & Herz. Georgia Macedonia Monaco Montenegro San Marino Serbia Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Armenia Azerbaijan Rep. of Moldova Russian Fed. Belarus Austria Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Malta Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Belgium Luxembourg Netherlands ECtHR EFTA C ECCIS CJEU BCJ ACtHPR Algeria Mauritania Tunisia Libya COMESA CJ Djibouti Egypt Sudan Eritrea Ethiopia EACJ Burundi Kenya Rwanda Uganda SADC T D.R.C. Madagascar Seychelles Swaziland Zambia Zimbabwe Angola Botswana Namibia Mauritius Malawi Lesotho Mozambique South Africa ECOWAS CJ Gambia Ghana Nigeria Cape Verde Liberia Sierra Leone WAEMU CJ Burkina Faso Côte d’Ivoire Mali Niger Senegal Togo CEMAC CJ Gabon Rep. of Congo Cameroon Central Afr. Rep. Equ. Guinea Chad Benin Guinea Guinea-Bissau Comoros Tanzania OHADA CCJ IACtHR Chile Costa Rica Dominican Rep. Haiti Mexico Panama Colombia Ecuador Peru Bolivia Argentina Brazil ATJ El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua CACJ MPRT Barbados Suriname CCJ Antig. and Barbuda Belize Dominica Grenada Guyana Jamaica St. Kitts & Nev. St. Lucia St. Vinc. & the Gren. Trinidad & Tobago Not accepting jurisdiction of a regional court: Bahamas Canada Cuba United States Brunei Cambodia Indonesia Laos Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam ASEAN AB* Not accepting jurisdiction of a regional court: Australia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan China D.P.R. Korea India Japan Maldives Mongolia Nepal New Zealand Pakistan Palau Rep. of Korea Srl Lanka Timor-Leste Europe Africa, Middle East & Arab World Americas Judicial Bodies of Regional Integration Agreements and Human Rights Courts: Overlapping Jurisdictions Judicial Body Seat Regional reach Paraguay Uruguay Not accepting jurisdiction of a regional court: Iran Israel Morocco Sao Tomé and Principe Not accepting jurisdiction of a regional court: Holy See Data Karen J. Alter, Cesare P.R. Romano [as of 1st July 2013] Visualization Francesco Sebregondi / Forensic Architecture CEEC Venezuela Tanzania Tanzania AIC Bahrain Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan Syria U.A.E. Yemen Uzbekistan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan * Statute adopted, judicial body not yet operational Universal reach CACJ (Managua) CCJ MPRT ATJ IACtHR ICJ ICC ITLOS WTO AB ECtHR, CJEU, EFTA C, BCJ, ICTY, STL ECCIS, CEEC SCSL OHADA CCJ WAEMU CJ ECOWAS CJ CEMAC CJ SADC T ACtHPR, EACJ, ICTR COMESA CJ AIC B&H WCC ASEAN AB ECCC From Romano C./Alter K./Shany Y. (eds.), The Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2014)

International Judicial Bodies Compulsory Jurisdiction ...faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~kal438/NewTerrainFromDepot/docs/... · International Judicial Bodies Compulsory Jurisdiction

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    16

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: International Judicial Bodies Compulsory Jurisdiction ...faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~kal438/NewTerrainFromDepot/docs/... · International Judicial Bodies Compulsory Jurisdiction

International Judicial BodiesCompulsory Jurisdiction Across the Globe

Inter-State Judicial Bodies

Note: Updated visualizations previously published in Alter, 2013

ITLOS

WTO AB

ICJ

International Criminal Court

States colored according to the acceptance of compulsory jurisdiction of one, two, or three international judicial bodies for inter-state disputes considered(ICJ, WTO AB, ITLOS)

States not accepting compulsory jurisdiction of any of the three bodies considered

States that have

Statute of the ICC

States that have not

Statute of the ICC

States that have

Immunity Agreement with the United States

Referral byICC State Party

Referral byUN Security Council

Proprio Motu investigation by the ICC

Situations that have been formally investigated by the ICC since its creation:

AlbaniaAndorraBosnia & Herz.GeorgiaMacedoniaMonacoMontenegroSan MarinoSerbiaSwitzerlandTurkeyUkraineUnited Kingdom

IcelandLiechtensteinNorway

Armenia AzerbaijanRep. of Moldova

Russian Fed.

Belarus

AustriaBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaMaltaPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakia SloveniaSpainSweden

Belgium Luxembourg Netherlands

ECtHR

EFTA C

ECCIS

CJEU

BCJ

ACtHPR

Algeria

MauritaniaTunisia

Libya

COMESA CJ

DjiboutiEgyptSudan

EritreaEthiopia

EACJ

BurundiKenyaRwandaUganda

SADC T

D.R.C.Madagascar Seychelles Swaziland Zambia ZimbabweAngolaBotswanaNamibia

MauritiusMalawiLesothoMozambiqueSouth Africa

ECOWAS CJ

GambiaGhanaNigeria

Cape VerdeLiberiaSierra Leone

WAEMU CJ

Burkina FasoCôte d’IvoireMaliNigerSenegalTogo

CEMAC CJ

GabonRep. of Congo

CameroonCentral Afr. Rep.Equ. Guinea

Chad

BeninGuineaGuinea-Bissau

Comoros

Tanzania

OHADA CCJ

IACtHR

ChileCosta Rica Dominican Rep. HaitiMexicoPanama

Colombia EcuadorPeru

Bolivia ArgentinaBrazil

ATJEl Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua

CACJ

MPRT

BarbadosSuriname

CCJ Antig. and BarbudaBelizeDominicaGrenadaGuyanaJamaicaSt. Kitts & Nev.St. LuciaSt. Vinc. & the Gren.Trinidad & Tobago

Not accepting jurisdictionof a regional court:

BahamasCanadaCubaUnited States

Brunei Cambodia Indonesia LaosMalaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore ThailandViet Nam

ASEAN AB*

Not accepting jurisdictionof a regional court:

AustraliaAfghanistanBangladeshBhutanChinaD.P.R. KoreaIndiaJapanMaldivesMongoliaNepalNew ZealandPakistanPalauRep. of KoreaSrl LankaTimor-Leste

EuropeAfrica, Middle East & Arab World Americas

Judicial Bodies of Regional Integration Agreements and Human Rights Courts: Overlapping Jurisdictions

Judicial Body Seat Regional reach

ParaguayUruguay

Not accepting jurisdictionof a regional court:

IranIsraelMoroccoSao Tomé and Principe

Not accepting jurisdictionof a regional court:

Holy See

DataKaren J. Alter, Cesare P.R. Romano

[as of 1st July 2013]

VisualizationFrancesco Sebregondi / Forensic Architecture

CEEC

Venezuela

TanzaniaTanzania

AICBahrainIraqJordanKuwaitLebanonOmanPalestineQatarSaudi ArabiaSomaliaSudanSyriaU.A.E.Yemen

Uzbekistan

KazakhstanKyrgyzstanTajikistan

* Statute adopted, judicial body not yet operational

Universal reach

CACJ (Managua) CCJ

MPRT

ATJ

IACtHR

ICJICC

ITLOS

WTO AB

ECtHR, CJEU, EFTA C, BCJ, ICTY, STL

ECCIS, CEEC

SCSL

OHADA CCJ

WAEMU CJ

ECOWAS CJ

CEMAC CJ

SADC T ACtHPR, EACJ, ICTR

COMESA CJ

AIC

B&H WCC

ASEAN AB

ECCC

FromRomano C./Alter K./Shany Y. (eds.),

The Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2014)