2
Editorial International Journal of Project Management special issue on Complexities in managing mega construction projectsMega projects are huge undertakings that could cost up to $1 billion or more, requiring resources that run into millions of man hours, with numerous stakeholder with an extraordinary amount of interlinks, a time to complete of 5 years or more and generates high public attention. These introduce complexities into their execution. Complexities in managing mega construction projects (MCP) can be spawned from three aspects: technical, social and managerial aspects. Technical complexities of mega construction projects are determined by the design and technologies employed in the design and construction process- es; social aspects relate to complexities from the inadvertent impact of megaprojects on the environment and social systems within their location of implementation; whilst managerial complexities are caused by the business and governance aspects of projects including financial arrangement, scheduling, re- sources deployment and decision management. Recently, many mega construction projects have been or are being built around the world, e.g. Dubai Tower, Beijing National Stadium, the Pearl gas-to-liquid plant in Qatar, the Gotthard Basistunnel, Crossrail, Hangzhou Bay Bridge, Taipei 101 Tower, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, etc. Managing these mega projects requires understanding and addressing the associated complexities with their implementation. As research has shown, mega projects in infrastructure have many times not produced favorable results. The disappointing results are visible in budget and schedule overruns as well as in a general stakeholder dissatisfaction. Especially the social complexity consisting of a combination of numerous, large and conflicting interests poses main challenges in the management of mega infrastructure projects. These challenges need to be addressed in order to successfully manage the expected investment boom in infrastructure. This special issue aims to provide a platform for practitioners and researchers in the area of construction management to communicate and discuss their experiences and research outcomes for understanding and managing the complexities of mega construction projects. Specifically, Ding, Wu, Li and Luo present a study on the safety control of metro construction of Wuhan Metro Line 2 (WML2). This study discusses how WML2 affects the safety of Wuhan Light Rail Line 1 (WLRL1) and its operation. It is identified that finite difference software FLAC3D for geotechnical engineering can be adopted to simulate the process of foundation pit excavation and to analyze the impact of isolation pile construction, underground dia- phragm wall construction, foundation pit dewatering and excavation on the bridge piers of WLRL1. The finite element software ANSYS is used to simulate the numerical model of WLRL1. Moreover, the impact of construction scheme of WML2 on the operation of WLRL1 is also presented in the paper. According to the simulation results, the control standards for the operation safety of WLRL1 and the advices for the safety control of the foundation pit construction are proposed. Antoniadis, Edum-Fotwe and Thorpe provide the results of five case studies, with UK construction organisations, which demonstrate that the effects of socio-organo complexity of interconnections on project performance have similarities with the behaviour of underdamped control systems. The results have implications for the way socio-organisational issues are managed but will also enable parallels to be drawn between the fields of project management and control systems. Jia, Yang, Wang, Hong and You study the relationship between mega projects and social conflicts by exploring mega projects from the perspective of social conflict theory, and develops the conceptual model of mega projects, including three propositions: 1) mega projects are the outcomes of social conflicts; 2) they function as safety valves in society; and 3) they have a close relationship with the level of political centralization and economic development. Sun and Zhang introduce an owner organization of a mega industrial construction project and proposes that cross-func- tional and cross-professional coordination is critical to the continuous improvement and successful implementation of the organization. Jia, Chen, Xue, Chen, Cao and Tang develop a framework of a program management maturity integrated model for mega construction programs, which consists of two sub-models: Organizational Management Sub-model and Process Management Sub-model, by referring to SMCIs (Standardize, Measure, Control, and continuously Improve) of Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3). A case study indicates this model can improve the management capability of all three parties, i.e. owners, designers and main contractors. 0263-7863/$ - see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. and IPMA. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.001 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com International Journal of Project Management 29 (2011) 795 796 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman

International Journal of Project Management special issue on “Complexities in managing mega construction projects”

  • Upload
    heng-li

  • View
    220

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: International Journal of Project Management special issue on “Complexities in managing mega construction projects”

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

International Journal of Project Management 29 (2011) 795–796www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman

Editorial

International Journal of Project Management special issue on “Complexitiesin managing mega construction projects”

Mega projects are huge undertakings that could cost up to$1 billion ormore, requiring resources that run intomillions ofmanhours, with numerous stakeholder with an extraordinary amount ofinterlinks, a time to complete of 5 years or more and generates highpublic attention. These introduce complexities into their execution.

Complexities in managing mega construction projects(MCP) can be spawned from three aspects: technical, socialand managerial aspects. Technical complexities of megaconstruction projects are determined by the design andtechnologies employed in the design and construction process-es; social aspects relate to complexities from the inadvertentimpact of megaprojects on the environment and social systemswithin their location of implementation; whilst managerialcomplexities are caused by the business and governance aspectsof projects including financial arrangement, scheduling, re-sources deployment and decision management.

Recently, many mega construction projects have been or arebeing built around the world, e.g. Dubai Tower, BeijingNational Stadium, the Pearl gas-to-liquid plant in Qatar, theGotthard Basistunnel, Crossrail, Hangzhou Bay Bridge, Taipei101 Tower, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, etc. Managingthese mega projects requires understanding and addressing theassociated complexities with their implementation.

As research has shown, mega projects in infrastructure havemany times not produced favorable results. The disappointingresults are visible in budget and schedule overruns as well as ina general stakeholder dissatisfaction. Especially the socialcomplexity consisting of a combination of numerous, large andconflicting interests poses main challenges in the managementof mega infrastructure projects. These challenges need to beaddressed in order to successfully manage the expectedinvestment boom in infrastructure.

This special issue aims to provide a platform for practitionersand researchers in the area of construction management tocommunicate and discuss their experiences and researchoutcomes for understanding and managing the complexities ofmega construction projects. Specifically, Ding, Wu, Li and Luopresent a study on the safety control of metro construction ofWuhan Metro Line 2 (WML2). This study discusses howWML2 affects the safety of Wuhan Light Rail Line 1 (WLRL1)and its operation. It is identified that finite difference software

0263-7863/$ - see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. and IPMA. All rights reservedoi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.001

FLAC3D for geotechnical engineering can be adopted tosimulate the process of foundation pit excavation and to analyzethe impact of isolation pile construction, underground dia-phragm wall construction, foundation pit dewatering andexcavation on the bridge piers of WLRL1. The finite elementsoftware ANSYS is used to simulate the numerical model ofWLRL1. Moreover, the impact of construction scheme ofWML2 on the operation of WLRL1 is also presented in thepaper. According to the simulation results, the control standardsfor the operation safety of WLRL1 and the advices for the safetycontrol of the foundation pit construction are proposed.

Antoniadis, Edum-Fotwe and Thorpe provide the results offive case studies, with UK construction organisations, whichdemonstrate that the effects of socio-organo complexity ofinterconnections on project performance have similarities withthe behaviour of underdamped control systems. The resultshave implications for the way socio-organisational issues aremanaged but will also enable parallels to be drawn between thefields of project management and control systems.

Jia, Yang, Wang, Hong and You study the relationshipbetween mega projects and social conflicts by exploring megaprojects from the perspective of social conflict theory, anddevelops the conceptual model of mega projects, includingthree propositions: 1) mega projects are the outcomes of socialconflicts; 2) they function as safety valves in society; and 3)they have a close relationship with the level of politicalcentralization and economic development.

Sun and Zhang introduce an owner organization of a megaindustrial construction project and proposes that cross-func-tional and cross-professional coordination is critical to thecontinuous improvement and successful implementation of theorganization. Jia, Chen, Xue, Chen, Cao and Tang develop aframework of a program management maturity integratedmodel for mega construction programs, which consists of twosub-models: Organizational Management Sub-model andProcess Management Sub-model, by referring to SMCIs(Standardize, Measure, Control, and continuously Improve) ofOrganizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3).A case study indicates this model can improve the managementcapability of all three parties, i.e. owners, designers and maincontractors.

d.

Page 2: International Journal of Project Management special issue on “Complexities in managing mega construction projects”

796 Editorial

London and Siva develop a reflexive capability model fromthe social sciences theory of individual agent reflexivity toexplain the way in which firms as an entity can developawareness, responsiveness and adaptability for long-termsuccess in diverse international markets. This paper extends aprevious Australian study which developed the model groundedin empirical observations of internationalising design construc-tion firms by presenting the results of a second study ofMalaysian firms. Results indicate that the model of reflexivitycapability is a useful way to interpret practices that areundertaken in multi-partner relationships on larger and morecomplex projects.

Chen, Li, Xu and Hong present a multi-criteria decisionanalysis for environmental risk assessment (ERA) to avoid andeliminate damages and loss under natural disasters ininternational airport projects. An ANP model called ERA.

Airport is developed and tested through an experimental casestudy on three international hub airports in China. It is foundedthat ANP can be effectively used for risk assessment in thespecific utility mode.

Xue, Shen, Tan, Zhang and Fan establish the models formeasuring the value of information sharing (VIS) under (s, S)and Periodic Review (PR) inventory policies to help generalcontractor to improve materials and equipments management inconstruction supply chain at firm-level.

Guest EditorsHeng Li

H.L. Guo⁎Corresponding author at: Hong Kong Polytechnic University,

Hong Kong.E-mail address: [email protected]