Upload
lilah
View
44
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
International Civil Aviation Organization PBN Implementation in Brasil Flight Inspection Seminar São Jose dos Campos – Brasil 21 – 23 november 2011 Ten Cel CTA Júlio Cesar de Souza Pereira Maj Eng Alessander de Andrade Santoro (DECEA). Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures. Objective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
International Civil Aviation Organization
PBN Implementation in Brasil
Flight Inspection Seminar
São Jose dos Campos – Brasil
21 – 23 november 2011
Ten Cel CTA Júlio Cesar de Souza Pereira
Maj Eng Alessander de Andrade Santoro
(DECEA)
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
Objective
Present Brazilian experience in
Performance Based Navigation and Flight Inspection.
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
Contents
Performance Based Navigation
Flight Inspection
Performance Based Navigation
• Area navigation based on performance requirements (accuracy, integrity, continuity, availability and functionality) for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a designated airspace.
• RNAV Operations does not include the requirement for performance monitoring and alerting
• RNAV Operations includes the requirement for performance monitoring and alerting
Performance Based Navigation
PBN
RNAV 1RNAV 1
1 Nautical Mile 95% of time
1 Nautical Mile 95% of time
Track Centerline
RNP 1RNP 1
1 Nautical Mile 95% of time
1 Nautical Mile 95% of time
Track Centerline
ALERT TO PILOT
Navigation Specification
Phase of flight
EnrouteOceanicRemote
EnrouteContinental
ARR Approach DEP(SID)Initial Interm. Final Missed
Approach
RNAV-10 (RNP-10)
10 - - - - - - -
RNAV-5 - 5 5 - - - - -
RNAV-2 - 2 2 - - - - 2
RNAV-1 - - 1 1 1 - 1 1
RNP-4 4 - - - - - -
RNP-1 / Básico
- - 1 1 1 - 1 1
RNP APCH - - - 1 1 0,3 1 -
RNP AR APCH
- - - 1 – 0,1 1 – 0,1 0,3 – 0,1 1 – 0,1 -
Navigation Specifications
Enroute Implementation
PBN (RNAV-5)
PBN Regional Enroute Implementation
Implementation Phases :
• Phase 1: Version 1 SAM ATS Route Network – implemented on 10/03/2011
• Phase 2: RNAV-5 Implementation – 20/10/2011• Phase 3 – Version 2 SAM ATS Route Network –
(October 2013)
Brazilian RNAV-5 Route Network Project
(Anticipation of SAM Version 2) Limited to the ATS Routes Network attending the main Brazilian TMA – 08 March 2012 (RNAV-5):
• Routes to be implemented - 27 • Routes to be canceled – 18• Routes to be partially canceled – 10 • Routes to be realigned – 56
BR
SP
RJ
BH
VT
CONVENTIONAL Route Network (2011)
BR
SP
RJ
BH
VT
RNAV 5 Route NetworkMarch 2012
TMA Implementation
PBN (RNAV-1 / RNP APCH / RNP APCH AR)
Main Regulations Main Regulations
Instruction 100-23 (Procedure Designer Rating)
Instruction 100-24 (Air Navigation Procedures Design)
Circular 100-54 (Air Navigation Procedures Design
Standardization).
Manual 53-3 (Aeronautical Charts).
Courses and TrainingCourses and Training
PANS-OPS General Criteria “Conventional” Air Navigation Procedures ILS, LLZ and PAR Approach Procedures RNAV/RNP Air Navigation Procedures. APV BARO/VNAV Procedures. Helicopters Procedures RNP AR APCH Procedures PANS-OPS Recurrent Training PANS-OPS Update Training
Procedure Designer Rating Procedure Designer Rating
Present Situation
37 Rated Procedures Designers
16 Rated APV/Baro-VNAV
8 Rated RNP AR APCH
TMA PBN Project
Main Activities
1 Airspace Concept Development
2 Performance Evaluation Plan
3 Safety Assessment
4 Collaborative Decision Making Process
5 ATC Tools
6 Rules and Procedures
7 Air Navigation Procedures Publication
8 Training
9 Aircraft and Operators Approval
10 Pos-implementation Monitoring
11 Documentation
Implementation Dates
• TMA BR and RF – Apr 2010 (implemented)
• TMA RJ and SP – Apr 2013 (on going)
• TMA BH and SV – Mar 2014
• TMA CT and PA – Jun 2015
Strategic ObjectivesStrategic Objectives
1. Safety
2. Capacity
3. Efficiency
4. Environment Protection
5. Access
Main Traffic Flows – São Paulo TMA
–
TMA-SP 2010
KPKP
GRGR
SPSP
CT – 6,4%
AMER. S. “S” 7,2%
PA – 5,8%
NF – 1,5%
FL – 3,5%
JV – 1,0 %
CX – 0,3 %
25,5%
DN – 0,5 %
AU – 0,3%
AMER. S
. “N” 0
,8%
CG – 1,8%
SR – 1,0 %
AE – 0,6 %
ML –
0,4 %
CY –1,2 %
6,6%AFRICA – 0,7%
VT – 2,0%G
L – 5,4%RJ – 10,9%JF – 0,3%
19,3%
EUROPA – 2,7%
NT – 1,2% PS – 0,7%
FZ – 2,0% MO – 1,0%
CF – 5,9% IL – 0,3%
AR – 0,2% JP – 0,3%
SV – 4,9% TC – 0,1%
RF – 2,8% IP – 0,2%
BH – 1,0%
23,3%
USA – 2,7%EG – 1,4%GO – 2,1%UL – 1,2%RP – 1,5%BR – 7,7 %BE – 0,5 %SL – 0,3 %
17,4%
LO – 0,8%
FI – 0,6%
MG
– 0,5%
1,9%
–
TMA-SP 2015
KPKP
GRGR
SPSP
CT – 5,9%
AMER. S. “S” 5,6%
PA – 5,8%
NF – 1,6%
FL – 3,1%
JV – 0,8 %
CX – 0,3 %
23,1%
DN – 0,5 %
AU – 0,3%
AMER. S
. “N” 0
,7%
CG – 1,7%
SR – 1,0 %
AE – 0,6 %
ML –
0,4 %
CY – 1,0 %
6,2%AFRICA – 0,7%
VT – 2,1%G
L – 3,8%RJ – 11,3%JF – 0,2%
18,1%
EUROPA – 2,1%
NT – 1,5% PS – 0,6%
FZ – 2,4% MO – 1,0%
CF – 7,2% IL – 0,2%
AR – 0,2% JP – 0,3%
SV – 6,4% TC – 0,1%
RF – 3,6% IP – 0,2%
BH – 1,1%
26,9%
USA – 2,1%EG – 1,0%GO – 1,8%UL – 1,5%RP – 1,5%BR – 9,2 %BE – 0,5 %SL – 0,3 %
18,0%
LO – 0,7%
FI – 0,5%
MG
– 0,5%
1,7%
LEGENDA
SBSP DEPSBSP ARRSBGR DEOSBGR ARRSBKP DEPSBKP ARR
KPKP
GRGR
SPSP
Proposed TMA
KPKP
GRGR
SPSP
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
SBSP DEPSBSP ARRSBGR DEOSBGR ARRSBKP DEPSBKP ARR
Approach and Departure Procedures Approach and Departure Procedures ImplementationImplementation
PBN Approach and Departures Implementation for about 140 Public Airport, taking into consideration the A37-11 Resolution Milestones
640 new charts were developed Publication Schedule was established in accordance with DECEA
and users need
Present Situation
88 LNAV only RNAV (GNSS) Procedures 63 LNAV/VNAV RNAV (GNSS) Procedures 125 RNAV SID
Santos Dumont Airport Santos Dumont Airport RNP APCH AR ProcedureRNP APCH AR Procedure
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV GNSS
MANINV (Manual Brasileiro de Inspeção em Voo – Brazilian Flight Inspection Manual) – section 214
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV GNSS
Procedures must be:
Safe;
Easy to understand;
Minimum pilot workload / flyability.
Tolerances
Course error to the next WAYPOINT = ± 1°
Distance error to the ext WAYPOINT = ± 0.1 NM
Obstacle Clearance
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV GNSS
RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring)
Adequate horizontal precision;
Electromagnetic interference;
Masking angles due to obstacles;
Note: In the occurrence of RAIM alarm during the flight, the inspection must be interrupted in order to evaluate the possible
causes.
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV GNSS
Other causes of interruption
HDOP above 4.0
VDOP above 4.0
Number of tracked satellites bellow 5
HFOM above 22m
Strange results in the receiver
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV DME/DME
CIRINV 121-16 (17 NOV 2009) – Flight Inspection Circular
DME / DME
• Multilateration
• 30° < angle < 150°
• FMS (data base)
Critical DME
DME considered as indispensable to the execution of the procedure, as established by the procedure designer.
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV DME/DME
All segments requiring altitude variation must be inspected using minimum climbing gradients and minimum altitudes as specified in the procedure;
Aircraft must be equiped with 02 (two) FMS.
Flight inspection must be interrupted in case of a critical DME is out of operation
Two fases: Coverage and accuracy verification Procedure verification
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV DME/DME
COVERAGE AND ACCURACY VERIFICATION
Coverage of critical DME must be evaluated, according to the required profile (SID/STAR) to identify coverage outages in minimal flight altitudes.
Navigation during flight will be based on 1P´s FMS, which must be enabled to all sensors available.
On 2P´s FMS, all sensor, except DME and Inertial, must be disabled.
During the flight, Flight Inspector must identify the position every time ANP (Actual Navigation Performance), displayed in 2P´s FMS, is greater than the Required Navigation Performance to the leg of the procedure.
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV DME/DME
COVERAGE AND ACCURACY VERIFICATION (cont.)
During comissioning flights, each critical DME of the procedure must have its coverage and signal level verified by the Flight Inspection System.
During periodic inspections, signal level may be verified in “spot check”, prioritizing critical DME.
Flight Inspection for PBN Procedures
RNAV DME/DME
PROCEDURE VERIFICATION
The objective in this phase is to verify the procedure in the same configuration the air space users will use it.
Navigation will be based on 1P´s FMS, with all sensors disabled, except DME and INERTIAL.
All sensor in 2P´s FMS must be enabled.
QUESTIONS?