Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
^ i IC/90/47
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FORTHEORETICAL PHYSICS
fON THE FIRST INITIAL BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM
FOR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
INTERNATIONALATOMIC ENERGY
AGENCY
UNITED NATIONSEDUCATIONAL,
SCIENTIFICAND CULTURALORGANIZATION
Martin Lopez Morales
1990 MIRAMARE-TRIESTE
T " T" "T
IQW47
International Atomic Energy Agency
and
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS
ON THE FIRST INITIAL BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMFOR PARAnOLIC EQUATIONS *
Martin Lopez Morales"
International Centre for Theorclical Physics, Trieste. Italy.
ABSTRACT
In (he present paper we establish the solvability (existence and uniqueness of the solution)
of the first initial-boundary value problem for linear and nonlinear parabolic equations of second
order in a cylindrical domain, under the assumption of Holder continuity of the coefficients only
with respect to the space variables. The corresponding solutions and its derivatives up to the second
order inclusively satisfy the Holder condition with respect to the space variable and with respect lo
the time.
MIRAMARE-TRIESTE
March 1990
To be submitted for publication.Permanent address: Institute* de Matemalicas, Academiadc Cicncias, Callc"0"N.X, Hntre 17 y 19.
Vctlado, Mabiina, Cuba.
t. INTRODUCTION
In (he present paper we establish new a priori estimates in anisotropic Holder norms for
the solutions of the linear parabolic equation
)tl = f(t,x) (1)
in a cylindrical domain QT = \0,T] x ft with the inliial condition
u||.o = (9(z)
and the following condition on the lateral surface Sr ofQr
(2)
(3)
I lere x = ( i t , . . . xn) is a point of ft , ft is a bounded domain in n- dimensional Euclidean space
En,t e ( 0,7*1. Sr » | 0 , r i x flft.where 3ft is the boundary of ft. ft = ft Udft .
The novelty in these estimates consists in the fact that, unlike the known results 11 J-|6|.
which are proved under the fulfilment of a Holder condition with respect to the totality of variables
( t , x ) on the coefficients of equation (1), our estimates are obtained only under the assumption
of Holder continuity of the coefficients in | 0 , 7"] x ft with respect lo ihe space variables, in this
connection, however, we also obtain an estimate of the module of continuity with respect to ( of
the higher derivatives u,.*, (but not u().
On the basis of new a priori estimates for the solutions of the problem {I \-Q) we establish
in this work the corresponding theorem on the solvability for this problem in Holder anisotropics
spaces.
With the aid of Ihe results of the linear theory we obtain a theorem on local solvability
with rcspcci lo ihe time ( of the first initial-boundary value problem for the nonlinear parabolic
equation
u, = ^ ( £ , i > t ( , u J , t i I I ) (4)
in Qr with the initial condition (2) and the boundary condition (3), where uz = ( « „ , . . . u , , ) ,
« n = ( • • • , U I , x / ( - • • ) , I < » , j < n .
In the present article E(j.(4) is linearized directly. No conditions are imposed here on ihe
nature of ihe growth of ihe nonlinearity of the function .4, which is defined for( ( , i ) € Qr and any
u, n,,!! , , , The main assumption concerning the function A(t, x,u,p,r), where p = (p i , . . . ,p , )
and r = ( . . . , r,; t . . . ) , I < i, j < n, is the parabolicity condition: for any nonzero vector f =
(fi i- •• ,tti> £ E* and any ( t , i ) € Qr, u,P,f
r r -
.-. n-'!>"-"-
where A,{ - • •) is the m.ilrix |Hr.>(«, x, u, p, r)J| and (£, n) denotes here and below the usual scalar
product in En.
We assume that the coefficients o^ ( t , x ) of Eq.(l) satisfy the uniform parabolicily con-
dition: for any nonzero veciorf = ( f i , . . .£„) G En and (t,x) € QT
IJ . X = const. (6).j-i
We suppose in all the woric that in Eq.(l), the function / = /i + / j ; av . h,c and /isatisfy the Holder condition in QT of exponent a 6(0,1[ with respeci to the space variables andft satisfies the Holder condition in Qr of exponent 0 G]0, l[ respect to the space variables, 0 <a < 0 < 1. All the coefficients and the independent terms are continuous in the cylinder Qr.
On the other hand, as complementary conditions, we require that the coefficients a,, ((, x)satisfy the Lipschiii condition with respeci lot on the lateral surface ST °fQr- Ihe other coefficientsarid the function / I ( 1 , I ) saiisfy the Holder condition in Sr of exponent ct/2 respeci to t and thefunction / j ( | r i ) of exponent 0/ 2.
We require less smoothness conditions from the functions A(t,x,u,p,r), ip(x) andi/>( (, z) than in the works |71-(9|.
2. BASIC NOTATIONS. AUXILIARY PROPOSITIONS
Tor the continuous functions ti(t ,i) in the cylinder Qr. we introduce the following
Hi ' t - ^p MSi0,|iiftlJ.= sup H ; O P (7)
wheresup |«(t,sr)|, « „ (8)
Por the functions thai have continuous derivatives with respect to x up to the order i, (I - 1,2)
inclusively in the cylinder QT we define Ihe norms
H J B I < « 0 , 1 , 2 (to)
i I' + V I I'
We will denote hy C ' ^ ( Q ( ) , € = 0 , 1 , 2 the Banach space of functions u( (, i ) that are continuous
i n Q , = [ 0 , 1 ] x f l together with all derivatives respect l o i up to the onlerf , £ = 0 , 1 , 2 inclusively,
and have a finite norm (10).
We define the parabolic distance between each two points P = (t,x), R = ( T , y) o f Q r .
x = (x,,,..xj.y = ( ) / i , . . . , V . ) . O < t < r by the magnitude
( O )
Por the functions thai have continuous derivatives wilh respect to x up to the order 1,(1 = 0,1,
inclusively in the cylinder QT, we consider the usual norms
- sun (14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
We denote by Ct,a(QT), t = 0 , 1 , 2 the Banach space of functions u( t, i ) that arc
continuous in QT together with all derivatives respect to x up to order t inclusively, £ = 0 , 1 , 2
and have finite norms <15>—(17) respectively.
It is possible to consider all the preceding definitions in the layer n r » f O.TI x En (see
110|) or in Sr.
Wilh respect to the coefficients of Bq.(l) we assume that 0^(1, x),b,(t,x),c(t,x) e
Clr*(QT).iJ= 1 nand
ij-t
Moreover, on the lateral surface ST of QT <•<« coefficients a,j(t,x) satisfy the Lipschitzcondition will) respeci to (. ihe coefficients *,-( t, x), c(t, x) satisfy on Sr the Holder condition wilhrespect tot of exponent «/2 and
We will make the following assumption concerning the domain (I: there exists a number
pn > 0 such dial the part of the boundary d t l lying in the neighbourhood { | i - xa | < pa} of an
arbitrary point xi» of dil is rcprcsentable by an equation of the form
in which the function h has second derivatives that are bounded and Holder continuous of exponent
rt G (0 , I) uniformly with respect toxo.
For Eq.(4) we consider in addition to the parabolicity condition (5) that there exists ;t
domain / / / = { ( t , i ) £ QT', |U | < J, \p\ < J\r\ < J} in which the function A(t, x,u,p,r),
together with its derivatives wilh respect to u, p ,̂ r,j up to the second order inclusively, is continuous
and satisfies (he Lipschitz condition wiih respect to u,p,r and a [folder condition of exponent
or £ (0,1) with respecl to x and the constant By Moreover A(t,x, 0 ,0,0) 6 Cl^tQr)
\A(t,x,0,0,0)\[T^ < Bo, 0 > a , (20)
on ihe lateral surface ST of QT the functions j ( r ^ { l , i ( u , p , r ) i , > = I , . . . n satisfy the Lipschitz
condition wiih respect to t and the functions A(t,x,u,p,r) Ap,{ttx.u,p,r) satisfy on ST Ihc
I lolder condition of exponent 0/2 with respect to ( and the constant Bj Consider
B; = [ i e£ , ; i , >0 } and GT = |0,r| x {x e En; x» = 0}
The a priori estimate for the solution of the heal equation
u( - Ati = (21)
considered in the half-layer wf = [ 0,T] x E* with the zero initial condition
u|i-o = 0 ,
and Ihe boundary condition on GT
will be used in (his work to solve Ihe first initial-boundary value problem (l)-(3)
(22)
(23)
Lemma 1 Suppose / = / , + / 2 , / , € CJ^(ir^), h e C^(7rf), 0 < a < 0 < I,l / i |« I , < «•• \h\?tfi < coandu( t , i ) € C ^ ' ( w f ) is a solution of Ihe problem (2IH23) in jr*.
Then (lie inetjnalily
(24)
is satisfied forO < ( < T. Here n^ = ) 0 , t | x /?;, G t = [0,(1 x { i G /'7n; i « = 0 } and i f is a
constant depending only on n, a, 0, T-
5
Proof For every solution ir( t, i ) G Ci,a( wf) ° ^ l n e problem
14.0=0, (2ft)
(27)
,,...,!^,),;^ 1,2
considered in a half-layer w£, where
holds the estimate (see 1111)
The function U I ( ( , I ) = u ( t , i ) — v(t,x) is a solution in irj iof the equation
wilh the zero initial condition (22) and the boundary condition (23). Note that (he functions F\it,r) t
CirJ(fff) and Fiit,x) e Cj^'drf). Moreover,
' , 0 ) = 0 , > = 1 ,2
Now we extend the function w{(, i ) into the domain i n < 0 by putting
-r» ^ -r \- fw(( , i ' , i . ) , i , >0
The function ui( t,x',x*) is a solution in irj-= [ 0, r | x En of the equation
(30)
with the zero initial condition (22), where
i. >0
Under (hese assumptions, the function t l i ( ( , i ) has continuous derivatives with respecl to
i up to the second order inclusively in ihe layer 1 0 , r | x En. Fn>m the conditions a), b) it follows
that /'", e Cn^J(wr) J |n ( l Ft € C^^d f r ) - F<>r 'he solution ur((, i) e C2,o(n7-) of the Cauchy
problem (30), (22) holds the following estimate (see Lemma 4 in [ 12]) for 0 < t < T
i < (31)
r -
Using the inequalities Mi ' i < M i ' i . Ifi C\h |Sj,, we obiain from (31) ihe estimate for 0 < t < T
< |/i C + l/> lo.!..1A C < l/i l!,'i •
+ 1/2 l?>) I (32)
fiy the eslima(cs of the moduli of continuity wilh respect Co the time for (he derivatives of ihc solu-
tion of ihc Cauchy problem for linear parabolic equations (see [ I3|), we obtain for (he ilcrivalivcs
ZJjw(t , i ) , £ = 0,1,2 f o r i G E* and* i,t2 6 | 0 , ( | (he inequality
m • \h&>i
Combining the inequalities (32) and (33) we can gel the eslimale
(34)
Since u ^ m t i i w obiain from (28) and (34) the eslimale (24).
Now consider the equation
= U , - ".,,, = f\{t,X) (35)
in the half-layer wf = | 0 , r | x E*. i 0 G fi-
We assume thai the coefficients a^(t,zo) satisfy ihe uniform parabolicity condition (6),
M t , i o ) | < A , te fO. r ] (36)
and ihe Lipschiiz condition in [{), 7*] with the constant A.
2 Lei u( t, x) 6 C [ ^ ( wf) be a solution of the problem (35), (22), (23) in (he half
layer irf. Under ihe same conditions of Lemma I the inequality (24) is satisfied for 0 < I < T,
where ihc constant K depends on n,a,0,X, A ,T*.
Proof Using a Isncitr transformation
,p J t= l , . . . ,TU( = T. (37)
» < C i (n ,A r >) < dci(/4t,(0) < Ci(n,ii,\), (Aki = 0 for Jt > »"), we can transform
the operator £™,, a,,U, x«) %iz,tix, into the operator £)",, U(,(,(T,0. £ = ( ( ! , • • • { • ) , U<T,£) =
U ( T , I ( T , O ) and ihc half space/7* inlo itself (fB = JT",, J 4»( ( ) i , = / I™(0 i« . >!,»,(0 > 0).
In Ihe new variables ( r , f i , . . .£„) Rq. (35) is transformed into the equation
O8)
where
Noting that
— |(..o = 0 t = l , . . . , n - I ,
we obtain from (3K) and (40) that Fi(T,f ' ,0) = / i (T, z'( T,( ' ,0),0).
(40)
Applying Lemma I lo the solution U ( T , ( ) of the problem (38), (22), (23) and using (3H),
0')), (40) we obiain ihe estimate (by going back lo the original coorinates)
for 0 < ( < 7'.
Applying the interpolation inequalities (see Lemma 2 in (12|)
with e = j L in (41) we find that
(42)
Ho,«l
Using the initial zero condition (22) we derive from Eq. (35) the following inequality
then arguing as in the work |13J we can eliminate the term |u|[,'}| in (43). Therefore we gel the
estimate (24). Under the assumption concerning the dii there exists (by the Heine-Borel Lemma)
anumherpo > 0, such that ihe part of Ilie boundary dCl lying in Ihe ball £ w = {x; \x~xn\ < pn}.
Hi e c)Cl is rcprcscnlable by one of the equations
Xi = M i , ) , x. = ), t = 1,... N,
ihe point i , belongs to a domain E>( c Sn-i and |ft*|2iO < const., a 6 (0,1) .
Tor the functions ip(t,x), defined in ST = I 0,7*| x dii we intrmlucc Ihc followingnorms
where the norm | ||^,,, m = 0 , 1 , 2 in the right hand side is considered in the cylinder \ 0 , t] x
Df, S, = 10, ( | x an. If Iv^lUli* < oo we will say thai f> £ Cj | J , |S i ) m .o ,u • Moreover, we will
consider in S, the norm
Now we shall consider Eq. (I) with the initial zero condition (22) and the zero boundary
condition
«|ST = 0 (44)
X A PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SOLUTIONS OF LINEAR PARABOLIC EQUA-
TIONS
Theorem I Letu(t,z) £ C2,«(QT) be a solution of the problem (1), (22), (44) in the cylinder
QT. Assume that / , e Cj^(Or). h € C^(Qr) . 0 < a < 0 < t and | / , |*"n < oo,
l/z $0 < oo. Then ihere exists a constant K, depending only on n, a,f),\,T, dO., M and B such
thai(O <t<T)
l«l?i < ff I I/' l ( 1/2 li'J, + 1/2 |& (45)
Procif l.ci xo be an arbitrary point ofdii. There exists two numbers pa > 0 and AT such thai
ihe part of the boundary dQ lying in the ball C™ = { i ; | i — i o | < po } is rcpresentable by one of
Ihe equations
* i ) , \ht\2,a< const., l~\t...N
Denote by Q" the cylinder 10,T] x K£. The transformation
Vi = Xi, •. - , y - i = i , _ i , V, = i , , • • , Vn-i = x* ,
f, = i ,-Mi!),«=l, . .JV, (46)
maps (df i ) U IC^ onto a set which lies on yn = 0 and, as we may assume, it maps il U K.™ onto
a domain lying in (he half space yo > 0 and some half ball £JJ" n {j/n > 0 } , JJO = y(x0) is
contained in this domain.
tion
The mapping (46) i s o n e - l o - o n e , nondcgeneratedand il transforms EQ. (1) into the equa-
(47)
where u( l ,y) = u( t, i< « ) ) , the coefficients a,;( I, !/),b,(t,y) c ( t ,y ) , / i ( t , y ) and/jU,!/) satisfy
the same assumptions of continuity that a,j(.t,x), b,{t,x) ,c(t,x) / i ( ( , i ) and/2<t , l ) .
Let d be a number in ( 0 , l | , tj(j/) = ni\y — Jtol). where j*(r) is a infiniicly differentiablc
funclion on r > 0 , ;i(r) = 1 for 0 < r < rf; ̂ ( r) = 0 for r > 2d and satisfying the inequality
3
£V| l i ( > )(»-) | < const (4R)• -1
We will assume that 2d < a, then the function w(t,y) = Tj(y)u(t,y) satisfies the
equation
where
s w, - (4'J)
•J-I
in the half layer TT£ = [ 0, T\ x E* with the zero initial condition (22) and the boundary condition
wL-o = 0 (50)
Now arguing as in Theorem I of [10) we find that
where | t | ,2ct indicate that the norms in the right hand side of (51) are considered in the cylinder
Qiid = 10 ,1 | x {JCJ^n£*} and the norm | • | j ^ ' i s considered with respect to all variables irt
I" St,id ~ [0,11 x {y; |y — jrn| = 2d} the following inequality is satisfied
Applying Lemma 2 to the solution w((,j/) of Ihe problem (49), (22), (50) and using (51).
(52) we obtain the estimate (taking d = min( I Ay)", j))
(53)
10
T r "
For some <4(, d\ Uh < d-\) we obtain the estimate (by going back to the original coordinates)
With the aid of Theorems 1 and 3 of f I3| we derive the interior estimates
lu\i'& i f f l/'lo'a + ' l/itoji + l"li,o 1< (55)
where the norms on the right hand side are considered in the cylinder fO,( | x Q * ^ , f l * ' 4 =[x E SI; disl (x,dSi) > %•} and the norm on the left hand side is considered in the cylinder
Since io is an arbitrary point of dii we can gel from (54) and (55) the estimaic in Q,
Applying the interpolation inequalities of Lemma 2 in | I 2 | with e small enough and
arguing as in the last part of the proof of Lemma 2 lo eliminate the term |u|£'o we get the estimate
(45).
Remark I We can reduce the first initial boundary value problem with non-zero initial and
boundary conditions loihe problem (1), (22), (44), if the initial and boundary functions be long lo the
corresponding spaces Cj ,„(£}), C7,a(Sr) and the boundary function has a continuous derivative
wiih respect to t bounded and measurable on ST-
4. EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS T H E O R E M S
Theorem 2 Suppose that all conditions of Theorem 1 are true. Assume further that (he fol-lowing consistency condition holds
Then there exists a untrue solution of the problem (1), (22), (44) in the space Ci,a(Qr) wi
continuous derivatives ut in QT.
We can gel the proof of the theorem on the basis of the new a priori estimates establishedin this work and with the aid of the method of continuity in a parameter (see 111 and 1111).
We proceed now lo formulate the local esistence theorem for solutions of the nonlinearproblem (4), (2), (3).
We have that
A{t,x,u,uItulz) = £(u) +.4(t,i,0,0,0) + F(t,x,u,aItuxz) (57)
II
where
£(u)
HAAt,x,0,0,0),utI)
L c m m a 3 Suppose that the functions u ' ( ( , i ) 6 C['^{QH), Q,o = | 0 , j n | x Cl,e= 1 ,2 .Assume further thai j u ' ( t . i ) | < J, | u , ( ( , i ) | < / , ! « „ ( t , i ) | < J f o r ( ( , j ) £ Q,o . Then for0 < ( < lo ihc following inequalities are satisfied
(5H)
(5'J)
\F(t,x,ut,ulu]a[) - F(U,«M,«L)
For the proof on this Lemma, see 110] *
Lemma 4 Under the same conditions of the Lemma .1 the following estimates arc satisfied for0 < t < ta
(fit)
The proof of this lemma is analogous to the Proof of Lemma 3.
Theorem 3 Suppose that all assumptions with respeel to the function A(t,x,tt,p,r) hold.Assume further that A(t,x, u, p, r) satisfies the following consistency condition
•4(0 , i ,0 ,0 ,0) |an = 0 (62)
Then there exists to, determined by the above assumptions, such that the problem (5),(22), (44) has in the cylinder Qtt = [0,t<i] x il a unique solution u{(, i ) € C2,<,(Q(|>) with aconlinuous derivative u(.
Proof We will prove Theorem 3 by means of an iterative process in which one successively
solves the equations
ulB1 = £ ( u m ) + f 1 ( t , s ,u"- I ,u™" l ,u™- 1 )+ J 4(t ,a: > 0,0 ,0) (63)
m = 1 , 2 , . . . , with the zero initial condition (22) and the boundary condition (44). Furthermore
u D ( t , i ) E 0
We will show thai (here exists a such sequence of functions um(t, x), m = 1 , 2 , . . . defined in some
cylinder | 0 , Cn I x fl with („ small enough. Moreover they are bounded in Ci,a(Qi,)-
12
We assume that there exists the functions u', t < m - I ami they satisfy the inequality
|u'|?;; < ? = consl = m i n ( l , J ) (64)
where the numbers to and g are still to be determined.
Now we can consider Eq.(63) as an equation of the type ( I ) , where
| l 1 ) = .4(t,i,o,0,0)
Prom Theorem I it follows that there exists the function u m ( ( , i ) e C j , a ( Q ( o ) and by Theorem 1
it satisfies the inequality
|u~|?;; < K,\\F\<0'°><'°> (65)
We will use Ki, Kt, Kj,... lo denote constants, depending on a,0,Bj, Bo, 9 f t but not depending
o n in •
Using (58), (60), (65) and (20) we obtain
From the inequalities (64) it follows the estimate
(67)
Pulling 2 K2q < £, yij we find that
In the last inequality we have selected
On the other hand the function ui = u™ — u m ~ l is a solution of the equation
(68)
with the 7cm initial condilion (22) and the boundary condilion (44).
Applying theorem 1 to the function w ( i , i ) , using (59) and (61) we obtain the inequality
13
From (64) and (68) it follows that
Therefore if we choose
then
(70)
We have dtterinined the number t» by (6R), lhcn the sequence u ™ ( ( , i ) converges in the space
Ci^iQta)- Consequently we can get a limit for m —t oo in Eq.(63).
We proceed now to prove the uniqueness of the solution of the problem (5). (22), (44).
Assume that there exists two solutions u ' ( i , x), u 2 ( ( , j ) of this problem and consider the function
« = u1 - u1. This function satisfies the equation (in the smaller of the corresponding cylinder Q ( o)
u( = Lu
where
,u= /Jo
+(1 -
,i
+ (/ Ad.l.T.l'JO
Here the components of the vector function i ' = ( u ' . u ^ u j , ) £ = 1,2 belong to the sp;icc
Cla'"J(Qto) and the coefficients of the operator L also belong to this space. Since u ( t , i ) sat-
isfies the zero initial condilion (22) and the zero boundary condilion (44) lhcn from Theorem I h
follows that t i ( t , i ) = 0 . This completes the proof of Theorem 3.
Remark 2 We can reduce the first initial-boundary value problem with nonzero initial and
boundary conditions to the problem (5), (22), (44) if the initial and boundary functions belong to the
corresponding spaces Cjj(Cl), dfiiSr) alu^ l n c boundary function has a continuous derivative
with respect to t hounded and measurable on 5> .
Acknowledgments
f l ic author would like to thank Professor Abdus Salam, the International Atomic Fincrgy
Agency and UNliSCO for hospitality at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste.
14
REFERENCES
[ l | A. Friedman, Partial Differential Equations of Parabolic Type (Prentice-Mall, Hnglc-wood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1964).
| 2 | V.A. Solon nikov, "On boundary value problems for linear parabolic systems ofdifferen-tial equations ofgeneral form".Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov 83 (1965), Proc. Slcklov Inst.math. 83 (1965).
| 3 | C. Ciliberlo, "Formule di maggioraiione e leoremi di esistenza per le solution! delle
cqttazioni paraboliche in due variabili", Ricerche Mat. 3 (1954), 40-75.
|4 | R,B. Barrar, "5ome estimates for solutions ofparabolic equations", J. Math. Anal. App.
3(1961)373-397.
| 5 | A. Friedman, "Boundary estimates for second order parabolic equations and their ap-
plications", J. Math, and Mech. Vol. 7, 5 (1968) 771-792.
|6] LA, Gusarov, "Estimates of solutions of the first-initial boundary value problem for
parabolic equations of higher order", Dokl. Akademie Nauk. SSSR, Vol. 166, 4 (1966)767-770.
[7| S.D, Eidelman, Parabolic Systems, (NoordhofF, Grioningcn and North-Holland, Ams-terdam, 1969).
[8| N.N. Shopolov, "The first boundary value problem for nonlinear parabolic equations of
arbitrary order", C.R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 23 (1970) 899-902.
|9 | S.N, Kruikov, "Linear and nonlinear parabolic systems on the plane", Dokl. Akud.
NiuikSSSR.T. 187,3(1969)510-513.
1101 S.N. Kru fckov, A. Castro and M. Lopez, "Schauder type estimates and existence theorems
for the solution of the Cauchy problem for linear and nonlinear parabolic equations (II)",
Ciencias Malemalicas, Vol. I (1982) Universidad dc La Habana 37-55.
111 j O.A. Ladyzenskiija, V.A. Solonnikov and N.N. lin\Eceva,"IJnearandQuasilincarequa-
tions of parabolic type", Trans. Math. Mon.. Vol. 23 American Mathematical Society
(1968).
112| S.N. Kruikov, A. Castro and M. Lopez, "Schauder type estimates and existence theorems
for the solution of the Cauchy problem for linear and nonlinear parabolic equations (I)",
Ciencias Mulematicas, Vol. 1, 1 (19R0) Universidad de La Habana, 55-76.
113| M. Lopez, "On the solvability of the Cauchy problem for linear parabolic equations",
Ciencias Matematicas, Vol. IX, 3 (1988) Universidad de La Habana, 3
15
T r
-SW « ' • • W « HI WWillH—III H WIUTBilW ,
Stampato in proprio nella tipografia
del Centro Internazionaie di Fisica Teorica