Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
International Business and Economics Conference, Innovative Approaches of
Management Research for Regional and Global Business Development
August 3-5th, 2012
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF
“TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE
UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF BEHAVIOR
Doctoral Student/Publisher:
Andreas Michael Giesa
Supervisor:
Prof. Dr. Inesa Voroncuka
Publication
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Publications
Giesa, Andreas Michael, Laboratory Case Study on Behavior Change: Is it possible to train
behavior and trigger a sustainable change?, Current Issues in Management of Business and
Society Development, Riga, Latvia, May 5th-7th, 2011
Giesa, Andreas Michael, Team Performance & Behavior Economics linked to a brief laboratory
Pre-Test of measured behavior influence as a determine of Team Performance,
International Conference, Academy of Business Administration, London, UK, August 3rd-7th,
2011
Giesa, Andreas Michael, Measuring Team Performance under the determinants of behavior – a
result of a Pre-Test Survey, International Conference, Current Issues in Economic and
Management Sciences, Riga, Latvia, Nov 10th-12th, 2011
Giesa, Andreas Michael, Measuring Team Performance under the determinant of behavior – a
empirical result, Global Business Research Conference, University of Applied Sciences, Fulda,
Germany, Dec 2nd -4th, 2011
Giesa, Andreas Michael, A Secondary Analysis in Team Performance to Determine Behavior in
a Software Population, The Economic, Finance & International Business Research
Conference, Miami, USA, Dec 8th-11th, 2011
Giesa, Andreas Michael, A Validation Result of an empirical research study in measuring Team
Performance under the determinants behavior, International Academy of Buisness and
Economics , Key West, USA, Mar 9th-11th, 2012
Giesa, Andreas Michael & Prof. Dr. Inesa Voroncuka, Determinants of Team Performance in
Business Organization empirically researched under Influence of behavior – validated in a
European environment, International Conference New Challenges of economics and
business development, Riga, Latvia, May 9th-11th, 2012
Giesa, Andreas Michael, Reflection on the definition “Team” based on a result of measuring
Team Performance under the determinant behavior, International Business and Economics
Conference, Kufstein, Austria, Aug 3rd-5th, 2012
Page 2 07.08.2012
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 3
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
Conclusion for
Team definition
Behavioral Economics enters more and more into business
organizations and Team Performance develops to a key
driver.
Behavior becomes more important due to the
crisis and trigger changes through organizations that like
to become also measured.
Olfert outlines that a team can be described as a group of
interdependent individuals who have complementary
competences and are willing and concentrated on a
shared, meaningful purpose and specific, common goal
Teams are central for a success. Researchers in this field
are: Hyatt, Ruffy, Furnham, Moran, Cummings, Bromiley,
Balderson, Jones, Breyerlein, Johnson, Bradach, Moran,
Kirsch, Ryckman, Tesuluk, Probst
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 4
Team Trust = Degree to which team members believe
they can depend on each other (abilities and intentions)
Team Behavior = on the origin of psycho-hysological,
extro-intro, values, diversity
Team Behavior Personality = personality aspects of
experience (age, education)
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 5
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 6
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 7
The empirical secondary research analysis indicates in its reflection measurable overlaps
and outlines behavioral impact.
Key determinants of Team Performance might be heterogeneity and education; medium
determinates Team Performance in relation to behavior might be age range, diversity
index, and determinants of business relations do not need to be focused anymore at all,
and open vacation days seems to be a minor role in determining Team Performance in
relation to behavior.
The average team number is 8.8; a suitable amount of 602 people evaluated.
In conclusion, the secondary analysis reflects a tendency of the Pre-Test with variations in
diversity and age range. The secondary analysis was a valuable empirical research to
analyze the trends of the hypotheses and review the variables and their influence on the
topic of Team Performance with determination of behavior.
In reflecting on the Pre-Test the following function was made:
TP = f(TPr, Vr); f (AR,Ed,H,DI,FR) + (BR);
TPsum = f(2079, 48); f(13,21,2,5,0)+(2) / (TPr = Team Productivity Rater, Vr = Vacation
Rate, AR=Age Range, Ed = Education, H- Heterogeneity, DI = Diversity Index, FR =
Fluctuation Rater, BR = Business Relation).
In review of the delivered secondary analysis, the following function can be made:
TP = f(TPr, Vr); f (AR,Ed,H,DI,FR) + (BR); TPsum = f(1599, 199); f(261,483,38,95,-
27)+(272). Looking at both functions, the question appears to be how they compare way
and is it possible to identify parallels.
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
Secondary
Analysis
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 8
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Survey
Validation
Secondary
Analysis
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Seite 9
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Population: Software Sales and Services 840 people
18 questions were asked with focus on behavior
466 people (55,47%) filled the survey
355 people (76%) answered the first question
295 people (64%) answered the last question
Age Ragen of responded was 30-49 years
78% had at least a bachelor degree
45 % had lived abroad
40% had 5-10 open vacation day, 25% more than 11 days
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
Survey
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Seite 11 07.08.2012
The three key hypotheses
Reflecting these dimensions and the behavioral aspect, the following
hypotheses are defined:
Field Behavior: Dimension Team Trust:
HyTT The higher the heterogeneity, the higher the Team Performance
will be.
Field Behavior: Dimension Team Behavioral Personality:
HyTBP The higher the age range in the team, the higher Team
Performance will be.
Field Behavior: Dimension Team Behavior:
HyTB The higher diversity index in a team, the higher the Team
Performance will be.
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Validation
Seite 12 07.08.2012
Population of 256 students in Europe
56 teams in total
4.57 people per team in average
Age Range from 19 years up to 42 years
Heterogeneity: 111 students / 22 teams
Age Range: 68 students / 14 teams
Diversity: 77 students / 20 teams
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
Validation
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 13
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Validation
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 14
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Validation
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 15
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Validation
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Seite 16 07.08.2012
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
Team Trust
Hypotheses
Team
Behavior
Team
Behavior
Personality
Hy0 (TP) = f (Hy1TT, Hy1TB, Hy1TBP) + (Hy2TB * z);
Methods of
Research
Survey
Secondary Analysis
Pre-Test H, BR, AR, ED, DI, Vr
H, AR, ED, DI, Vr
H, AR, ED DI
Vr
H, AR,
DI Validation
H BR AR Ed DI VR
Level of
research
depness
Hy1TT Hy2TT Hy1TBP Hy2TBP Hy1TB Hy2TB
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 17
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
- Van Dick et al. define team as any group of people, who work
together. This work can be cooperative and interdependent in order
to produce goods or services.
- Schneider et al. put emphasize on the responsibility of each team
member for reaching the goals. The purpose is to meet the needs of
customers of the organization.
- Weinert adverts to the need for efficiency in a team. The author
shows a self-organized connection of individuals in order to work
hand in hand. Thus, a team can produce long-term troubleshooting.
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Page 18
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
Beyond that, the author drives through this new approach of team
definition a different trend of initiative by how to set up a team to
increase Team Performance. Sourced on the research of the
author Hy0 (TP) = f (Hy1TT, Hy1TBP, Hy1TB) + (Hy2TB * z), the author
proposes in further researches empirically and practically to test
more into Team Performance and set up of teams based on the
research result.
As a final point, the author outlines that the delivered empirical
research results gives evidence that behavioral economics is
continuing entering the economic measurable environment and
delivers a new definition of a team. The author has empirically
proven a trend of Cammerer’s statement that behavioral
economics increases the explanatory power of economics due
to these delivered realistic psychological, measurable and
empirical proven foundations.
The author drives and proposes the adjustment of team definition
and to include the behavioral aspect by definition.
Seite 19 07.08.2012
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF “TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF
BEHAVIOR
Cluster Behavior
Introduction
Hypotheses
Measurements
Research Result
Conclusion for
Team definition
Secondary
Analysis
Survey
Validation
© Andreas M Giesa 2012. All rights reserved
International Business and Economics Conference, Innovative Approaches of
Management Research for Regional and Global Business Development
August 3-5th, 2012
REFLECTION ON THE DEFINITION OF
“TEAM” BASED ON A RESULT OF MEASURING TEAM PERFORMANCE
UNDER THE DETERMINANT OF BEHAVIOR
Doctoral Student/Publisher:
Andreas Michael Giesa
Supervisor:
Prof. Dr. Inesa Voroncuka
Publication
