Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.energy.gov/EM 1
Interagency Performance and Risk Assessment Community of Practice
P&RA CoP Technical Exchange MeetingAiken, SC, October 30-31, 2018
Ming Zhu, Ph.D., PE, PMP
www.energy.gov/EM 2
• Site-specific performance and risk assessments (also called safety assessments) are used to inform and support management decisions and to demonstrate compliance with the performance objectives under CERCLA, RCRA, and NEPA, 10 CFR 61, DOE Order 435.1, and NDAA Section 3116:
� waste form development and implementation;
� tank closure activities;
� waste site closure activities;
� in-situ decontamination and decommissioning;
� soil and groundwater remediation; and
� management of disposal facilities
• To protect human health and the environment
Performance and Risk Assessments
www.energy.gov/EM 3
Promote technical exchange and develop best practices
for performance and risk assessments that are used to
inform and support management decisions associated
with regulatory compliance with CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA,
10 CFR 61, DOE Order 435.1 and NDAA Section 3116.
Promote technical exchange and develop best practices
for performance and risk assessments that are used to
inform and support management decisions associated
with regulatory compliance with CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA,
10 CFR 61, DOE Order 435.1 and NDAA Section 3116.
Interagency Performance & Risk
Assessment Community of Practice
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
www.energy.gov/EM 4
P&RA CoP History
• DOE EM sponsored the Performance Assessment Community of Practice (PA CoP) in 2009, to:
a) provide means to address consistency early and throughout PA process;
b) foster early and sustained communication among CERCLA, NEPA, RCRA, and DOE O 435.1 activities involving LLW, tank closure, and D&D;
c) provide a forum to share information regarding state of the art and specific models, data and approaches; and
d) serve as an enduring data and modeling resource to minimize duplication of
effort across DOE and train future generation of PA professionals
• In late 2013, the group was broadened as P&RA CoP to emphasize:
a) the need for an integrated regulatory framework when cleanup work at a given site is subject to overlapping environmental regulations (CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, and DOE Order 435.1); and
b) the importance of risk assessments in non-DOE self-regulated cleanup activities
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
www.energy.gov/EM 5
P&RA CoP Governance
Governed by a chartered Steering Committee; otherwise self-directing.
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
www.energy.gov/EM 6
P&RA CoP Steering Committee
Ming Zhu, Chair, DOE EM
Alaa Aly, CHPRC/INTERA
George Alexander, NRC
Bob Andrews/Matt Kozak,
INTERA
Craig Benson, Univ. of
Virginia/CRESP
Paul Black, Neptune, Inc.
Jim Clarke/Kevin Brown,
Vanderbilt Univ./CRESP
Greg Flach, SRNL
Kurt Gerdes, DOE EM
Chris McKenney, NRC
Doug Hildebrand, DOE RL
Justin Marble, DOE EM
Jon Richards/Rob Pope, EPA
Region IV
Sherri Ross, DOE EM
Roger Seitz, SRNL (Retired)
David Sevougian, SNL
Kent Rosenberger, SRR
Stuart Walker, EPA
Cheryl Whalen/Dib Goswami,
WA Ecology
Ed Winner, Commonwealth of
Kentucky
www.energy.gov/EM 7
16 Webinars
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
September 27, 2018: Lessons Learned from Hydrological Modeling of the Saltstone Cap
July 11, 2018: U.S. Department of Energy Guidance on Application of RESRAD and PRG Calculator for Conducting
Radiological Risk A...
June 15, 2017: Closing Monitoring Factors through Risk-Informed Monitoring in Support of Department of Energy’s
NDAA Section 3...
April 19, 2017: Overview for Radiological Risk and Dose Assessment Models of National and International Agencies
May 16, 2016: Predicting the Service Life of Geomembranes in Low-Level and Mixed-Waste Disposal Facilities
February 23, 2016: Multi-Criteria Decisional Analyses: Methodology and Case Studies
January 28, 2016: Borehole Disposal of Spent Radioactive Sources
November 12, 2015: Implementing Optimization in the Superfund Program
November 10, 2015: Congressionally Mandated Review of the Use Of Risk-Informed Management in the DOE EM
Program
October 13, 2015: EPA Radiation Risk Assessment Approach
August 18, 2015: Probabilistic Analysis of Inadvertent Intrusion and the International Atomic Energy Agency Human
Intrusion in t...
May 20, 2015: Guidance for Conducting Technical Analyses for 10 CFR Part 61
October 16, 2014: Decisional Analysis under Uncertainty
June 3, 2014: Features, Events, and Processes: Practical Considerations for Development and Selection of Scenarios
February 20, 2014: Performance of Engineered Barriers: Lessons Learned
February 5, 2014: The Cementitious Barriers Partnership Toolbox, Version 2.0
December 12, 2013: The Use of Graded Approach in Hanford Vadose Zone Modeling
www.energy.gov/EM 8
8 Technical Exchange Meetings
• July 13-14, 2009: Salt Lake City. Theme: Engineered Systems for Closure and
Near-Surface Disposal
• April 13-14, 2010: Richland, WA. Theme: ASCEM, CBP, and Examples of
Modeling Applications
• May 25-26, 2011: Atlanta. GA. Theme: 10 CFR 61 Update, Software QA, PA
updates
• December 11-12, 2014: Las Vegas, NV. Theme: Risk-Informed, Cost-Effective
Environmental Management Decisions
• December 15-16, 2015: Richland, WA. Theme: Interpretation of Performance and
Risk Assessment Results
• October 19-20, 2016: Germantown, MD. Theme: Probabilistic Risk Assessments;
Release and Transport of Key Radionuclides.
• October 18-19, 2017: Albuquerque, New Mexico.
• October 30-31, 2018: Aiken, SC. Theme: Risk-Informed Approach for Defining
End State for Closure of Remediated Sites
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
www.energy.gov/EM 9
3 Position Papers
• MANAGING UNCERTAINTY, Roger Seitz, SRNL (retired) (In review)
• SCALING CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS, Paul Black, Neptune & Company, Inc. (In Review)
• SERVICE LIFE OF ENGINEERED BARRIERS: MAKING THE CASE FOR LOW LEVEL AND MIXED WASTE FACILITIES, Craig Benson, University of Virginia/CRESP (Under Development)
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
www.energy.gov/EM 10
Collaborations
• Waste Management Symposia
• ICEMM (Formerly ISCMEM)
• IAEA MODARIA II Program
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
www.energy.gov/EM 11
This Week
10/30/2018 (Tu)
• Keynote: Priorities of the DOE Cleanup Program, Mike Budney(DOE SRS Site Manager)
• Session 1: End State and Site Closure
• Session 2: New Approaches and Methodologies
10/31/2018 (W)
• Session 3: Evaluation of Emergency Situations
• Session 4: Program and Project Updates
• Discussion
11/1/2018 (Th)
• Field Trip
www.energy.gov/EM 12
Thank you for your participation!
http://www.energy.gov/em/services/site-facility-restoration/performance-risk-assessment-community-practice-pra-cop
For questions or comments, please contact:
(301) 903-9240