12
^Interaction Point Events and Happenings in the SLAC Community February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Beginning of New Generation of High-Energy Electron-Scattering Experiments EXPERIMENT E142 CAPTURES NEUTRON SPIN by Emlyn Hughes DURING A DEMONSTRATION to prove its robustness, a replica of the thin-window glass target cell to be used in experiment E142 shattered into pieces when banged against a metal table. The audience at the 8 AM Technical Division meeting burst into laughter. How- ever, the bad luck for experiment E142 ended there. During the experiment's seven-week run last November and December, almost everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam despite long exposures to high radiation. Experiment E142 marked the beginning of a new generation of high-energy electron-scattering experiments in End Station A. After completing pioneering work in 1982 on experiments to study the spin of the proton, SLAC ended its program of running high- energy polarized beams to End Sta- tion A and focused on the construction of the SLC. However, in 1987, CERN ran an experiment scat- tering polarized muons (particles like electrons but heavier) and found that the standard theory on the proton spin was wrong. The CERN experiment generated a huge interest in the field, with a few hun- dred theoretical papers trying to explain the results. Especially rele- vant to the discussion was what could be learned from the neutron and its spin. Thus began a three- way race between muon experi- The collaborators of E142, together again at End Station A. The beam line istorn apart in preparation for the next round of experiments. ments at CERN and electron experi- ments at SLAC and DESY. Experiment E142 at SLAC is the first measurement studying the neutron spin by scattering high- energy polarized electrons off a polarized 3 He gas target. 3 He is an atom consisting of two protons and one neutron. Neutrons by themselves are extremely hard to contain. But when they are inside an atom like 3 He, they can be studied since 3 He is easy to handle and put in a bottle. When the 3 He atom is polarized, the neutron spin lines up in one direction. The spins of the two protons, on the other hand, line up in opposite direc- tions to one another. The effects of the two proton spins cancel one another out, leaving only the polarized neutron. Therefore, a polarized 3 He target is a good model of a polarized neutron target. Beginning last November, experiment E142 ran using the full SLAC Linac. The experiment required special pampering from the operators, since the electron beams for fixed-target experiments require higher currents. Since a high-energy, polarized fixed-target beam had not been run in over a decade, it was quite a feat that the entire start up was accomplished in one week of beam tuning. The final beam stability was far better than previous polarized beams of past End Station A experiments. The improvement can be attributed to the major upgrades done for run- ning the SLC over the past years. Among the milestones in the experiment were: data collected with the highest energy ever deliv- ered to End Station A (25.7 GeV), the most stable polarized beam to (Cont'd. on p. 2) 1

^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

^Interaction PointEvents and Happenings

in the SLAC CommunityFebruary 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2

Beginning of New Generation of High-Energy Electron-Scattering Experiments

EXPERIMENT E142 CAPTURES NEUTRON SPINby Emlyn Hughes

DURING A DEMONSTRATIONto prove its robustness, a replica ofthe thin-window glass target cellto be used in experiment E142shattered into pieces when bangedagainst a metal table. The audienceat the 8 AM Technical Divisionmeeting burst into laughter. How-ever, the bad luck for experimentE142 ended there. During theexperiment's seven-week run lastNovember and December, almosteverything worked smashingly (nopun intended), and not one targetcell blew up in the electron beamdespite long exposures to highradiation. Experiment E142 markedthe beginning of a new generationof high-energy electron-scatteringexperiments in End Station A.

After completing pioneeringwork in 1982 on experiments tostudy the spin of the proton, SLACended its program of running high-energy polarized beams to End Sta-tion A and focused on theconstruction of the SLC. However, in1987, CERN ran an experiment scat-tering polarized muons (particleslike electrons but heavier) andfound that the standard theory onthe proton spin was wrong. TheCERN experiment generated a hugeinterest in the field, with a few hun-dred theoretical papers trying toexplain the results. Especially rele-vant to the discussion was whatcould be learned from the neutronand its spin. Thus began a three-way race between muon experi-

The collaborators of E142, together again at End Station A. The beam line istorn apart inpreparation for the next round of experiments.

ments at CERN and electron experi-ments at SLAC and DESY.

Experiment E142 at SLAC is thefirst measurement studying theneutron spin by scattering high-energy polarized electrons off apolarized 3 He gas target. 3 He is anatom consisting of two protonsand one neutron. Neutrons bythemselves are extremely hard tocontain. But when they are insidean atom like 3 He, they can bestudied since 3 He is easy to handleand put in a bottle. When the 3 Heatom is polarized, the neutron spinlines up in one direction. The spinsof the two protons, on the otherhand, line up in opposite direc-tions to one another. The effects ofthe two proton spins cancel oneanother out, leaving only thepolarized neutron. Therefore, apolarized 3 He target is a goodmodel of a polarized neutron target.

Beginning last November,experiment E142 ran using the fullSLAC Linac. The experimentrequired special pampering fromthe operators, since the electronbeams for fixed-target experimentsrequire higher currents. Since ahigh-energy, polarized fixed-targetbeam had not been run in over adecade, it was quite a feat that theentire start up was accomplishedin one week of beam tuning. Thefinal beam stability was far betterthan previous polarized beams ofpast End Station A experiments.The improvement can be attributedto the major upgrades done for run-ning the SLC over the past years.

Among the milestones in theexperiment were: data collectedwith the highest energy ever deliv-ered to End Station A (25.7 GeV),the most stable polarized beam to

(Cont'd. on p. 2)

1

Page 2: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

DRELL WINS ARMS CONTROL AWARDDEPUTY DIRECTOR SidneyDrell of SLAC received an impor-tant award on the evening of Feb-ruary 15, in a ceremony in Boston.The award is the Hilliard RoderickPrize in Science, Arms Control, andInternational Security, presentedby the American Association forthe Advancement of Science(AAAS). The award "acknowl-edges outstanding contributionsthat advance our understanding ofissues related to arms control andinternational security and thathave important scientific or techni-cal dimension."

As a matter of local interest,"Hilly" Roderick did his Ph.D.work at Stanford in NuclearPhysics under the direction of Pro-fessor Walter Meyerhof. Most of

Experiment E142(Cont'd. from p. 1)

date (no cesiation during the entirerun), the largest polarized 3 He tar-get ever built (one foot-long gastarget at nine atmospheres with0.1-mm glass windows), and arecord data rate in End Station A(200-kbytes/sec).

In total, the experiment collect-ed about 400 hours of data to tape.The beam polarization was stableand near 40%, and the target polari-

his work was done at the High-Energy Physics Laboratory. He isremembered as a hard-working,friendly collaborator, always fol-lowed by a small dog.

After graduating from Stanfordhe decided to put his training touse in a career in public service.He worked for many years for theUnited Nations Environmental, Scien-tific, and Cultural Organization, andduring the last year of his lifeorganized a major conference onarms control. Stemming from thisinterest his widow and familyestablished the prize which isbeing bestowed on Sid Drell. PiefPanofsky was the first recipient ofthe prize in 1991.

This award provides much-deserved recognition to our friend

zation varied slowly between 25%and 40% polarization. The analysisof the experiment is in progress,and results will be available for the1993 summer conferences. CERN'sresults with muon beams will alsobe presented this year. The DESYpolarized electron scattering pro-gram still hassome time to gobefore producing results.

The experiment's run markedthe end of a large two-year con-struction project involving a col-

and colleague at SLAC, Sid Drell,for his long dedication to the causescited in the language of the prize.On behalf of the entire SLAC staff,heart-felt congratulations!

Bill Kirk

laboration of eleven institutes fromthe US and France (American, Cler-mont-Ferrand, LBL, Livermore,Michigan, Princeton, Saclay, Stan-ford, SLAC, Syracuse, Wisconsin).A new beam line, polarized targetand spectrometer were needed tolaunch the project. The experimentcould not have succeeded withoutthe strong support of the SLACoperations groups. The E142 col-laboration extends a hearty thankyou, to the operations groups.

2

Page 3: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

KASE RECIPIENT OF LANIDAUER AWARDLAST MARCH, just a month after returning to SLAC,Ken Kase learned that he had been selected to receivea nationally recognized award for his work in radia-tion physics. The 1992 Robert S. Landauer, Sr. Memor-ial Lecture Award, named for the pioneering educatorof radiological physics, was formally presented to Kenfor "...distinguished contribution to the field of Radio-logical Physics and Radiation Health Protection." Theaward presentation was held in May 1992 by the Mid-west chapters of the Health Physics Society and theAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine.

In his lecture for the event, "Radiation Dosimetry:History, Challenges, and New Directions," Kenstressed that new concerns in radiation dosimetryneed to be addressed and that "We need to continueto be innovative in calculating and measuring radia-tion dosage."

As head of the ES&H Division's Radiation PhysicsDepartment, Ken is responsible for ensuring that newexperiments and experimental equipment complywith all SLAC and DOE radiation safety policies. Thus,Ken is constantly examining unusual challenges in theradiation physics field.

Ken began his career as a Health Physicist at theLawrence Livermore National Laboratory and thenjoined SLAC as a Health Physicist from 1969 to 1973.During that time he received his Ph.D. in Biophysicsfrom Stanford. Most recently, Ken was a professor ofRadiation Oncology and the Director of Physics,Department of Radiation Oncology, at the Universityof Massachusetts Medical Center.

When Ken decided to change the emphasis of hiscareer from clinical medical physics back to research-oriented radiation physics, he knew that he wanted toreturn to SLAC.

Ken's distinguished 30-year career includes the follow-ing highlights:

e Recipient of several awards, including the EldaAnderson Award in 1978 from the Health PhysicsSociety.

* Research in medical physics, biophysics, andhealth physics.

® Certification by the American Board of HealthPhysics and the American Board of Radiology.

* Training programs at Harvard, two schools ofthe University of Massachusetts, and San Jose StateUniversity.

* Associate editorship of both the Health Physicsand Medical Physics Journals.

® Author of numerous scientific papers. Ken alsohas edited a three-volume set on radiation dosimetry,and has co-authored a book on the same subject. Healso wrote a chapter on dosimetry of radon in the lungfor a book entitled Environmental Radon: Occurrence,Control ,and Health Hazards.

* Board Membership of the National Council onRadiation Protection and Measurement, for which healso chairs one committee and serves on two others.

F Fellowships with the American Association ofPhysicists in Medicine, the American College of Radi-ology, and the Health Physics Society.

-- Melinda Saltzberg and Andy Fields

GOODBYE, BILL KIRK; HELLO, BILL ASHBILL KIRK PLANS TO RETIRE from SLAC at theend of February after thirty years of service to the labo-ratory. Bill has worked with Joe Ballam, Pief, and me,and has been of inestimable value in keeping variousdirectors (especially me) on course. I have particularlyappreciated Bill's service as Assistant to the Director inboth his management role and his role as advisor andconfidant. I will very much miss his help and advicethat have been very important to the laboratory formany years. Bill will continue to come in a few days amonth to work on the Beam Line and to handle otherspecial projects which I will hand him from time to time.

The world goes on, and I am pleased to report thatBill Ash has agreed to become an Assistant to theDirector beginning on March 1. He will work with meon a broad range of technical and administrative mat-ters. His new assignment will start on a half-time basis

with the expectation that he will also continue his workas an experimental physicist with the SLD group. Howthings will evolve in the future will be worked out aswe go along.

As many of you know, Bill Ash has been at SLACfor some twenty years working with, in sequence, theold spectrometer facilities group (the fixed-target pro-gram at End Station A), then joining Dave Ritson'sExperimental Group F for experiments at PEP, thenjoining with Marty Breidenbach and the members ofthe SLD Steering Committee. Bill knows the laborato-ry, its denizens, and its problems very well, andbecause of his experience will be very effective. Pleasegive him your cooperation and assistance as he takesover a new set of duties.

Burton Richter

3

Page 4: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

IF YOU ENCOUNTER a breakerwhich was not designed to belocked, you may be able to install asimple, yet very effective, plasticdoodad which will allow you tolock the breaker in the off position.

This item, called a LockoutDevice for Breakers, has recentlybeen added to Stores' inventory. It

Single Pole Circuit Breaker Lockout

fits the small-sized breaker (with ahole running through the center ofthe breaker handle), and it comesin two different models. Model 1(Stores part number 42-300-100-01)is the Lockout, Single Pole Breakerfor $13.75 a three-pack. Model 2(part number 42-300-100-02) is theLockout, Multi Pole Breaker for$31.95 a six-pack. There is anothertype of lockout device which fitsstandard wall breakers; Model 3(part number 42-300-100-03) is theLockout Device, Wall Switch for $34a six-pack.

Multi Pole Breaker Lockout

These lockout devices do not fitHeinemann breakers. In our nextissue of Breakthrough for Breakers,we'll cover what devices are avail-able for Heinemann breakers andsome other types of breakers.

If you have any questions abouthow to use the lockout device forbreakers or if you have any con-

Wall Switch Lockout

cerns regarding lock and tag pro-cedures, please contact IshwarGarg, ES&H Electrical Safety Engi-neer, at ext. 2039.

-Tanya Davis

The Interaction Point © 1993, is published by Information Services of StanfordLinear Accelerator Center. Editors: Evelyn Eldridge-Diaz and Bernie Lighthouse.Interns: Karen Fox, Cynthia Mills, Trevor Payne. Photographer: Tom Nakashima.Deadline for articles is the first of every month. Items will be published on aspace-available basis and are subject to edit. Submissions may be sent electroni-cally to TIP@SLACVM or by SLAC mail to TIP, MS 68. Phone 926-4128.

4

_ _ _ 1_1_ � _ _ _ __ __ _ �I

mi""REAKTHROUGH FOR BREAKERS

Page 5: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

HELP FOR COMPUTER USERSby Carol Chatfield

SEVERAL LOCAL RESOURCES are available tohelp Mac or IBM clone PC users. To get set up, or toask network, hardware, and software questions, con-sult with your SLAC Apple Support Coordinator (ASC)or PC support person. Contact the SCS Service Desk atext. 2406 or send e-mail to SERVDESK@SLACVM to findout who your ASC or PC support person is. For hard-ware questions, call the Service Desk at ext. 4357(HELP), and for software queries, call ext. 2406.

The SLAC Library has additional sources of infor-mation including:

* Tutorials for a variety of Mac software* Many books about the Mac* The guide Using the Mac at SLAC (ask for it at the

Help Desk)The SLAC Mac User Group meets monthly (usually

on Thursdays at noon) in the SCS Conference room.And you can call the Berkeley Macintosh Users'Group (BMUG) Helpline from 9 AM to 5 PM weekdaysat (510) 540-1742. Stanford University offers Mac andPC classes and workshops. The complete schedule ofcourses was in the Campus Report September 9 issue.

ONLINE AT THE SLAC LIBRARY:Getting research information throughHEP and INSPECHAVE YOU EVER WONDERED what work hasalready been done on the project you are about toembark on? The SLAC Library has a variety of sourcesto help find relevant citations in your field of interest.Two databases in particular are very helpful, and bothare accessible from your terminal or workstation.

The first source is HEP, the SLAC Library databaseof high-energy physics preprints and published arti-cles. This database grows by 200 records a week, andis extremely timely. Use HEP to find the high-energyphysics information that your colleagues from aroundthe world are working on.

The second source is INSPEC, for those topics whichare farther afield. This is the on-line index to theseprinted indexes: Physics Abstracts, Electrical and Elec-tronic Abstracts, and Computer and ControlAbstracts. Francesco Villa's recent query is a goodexample of how to use INSPEC to quickly review a

new topic. Francesco is a physicist in ExperimentalGroup I. He wanted to know more about magneticsuspension. A search on INSPEC yielded 211 citations.The SLAC Library was then able to provide articlesfrom several of the most relevant references.

Both HEP and INSPEC are accessible online. To useHEP, simply log on to SLACVM from your workstation,and type SPIRES. Then type the command SELECTHEP. To see the many ways in which you can searchthe database, type SHOW INDEXES. For more help,type HELP HEP.

Here is how to access INSPEC, which is availablethrough the Stanford University Libraries' FOLIO on-line information system. From your workstation ormainframe account, TELNET to this address: elfl.stan-ford.edu. Type FOLIO at the "Account?" prompt, andyour Stanford ID card number at the "ID Number"prompt. Then choose INSPEC from the list of resourcesshown.

Call the SLAC Library at ext. 2411 for help withHEP, INSPEC, or to have a search conducted on any ofhundreds of commercial databases. We are alwaysglad to help obtain copies of material you have foundfrom these indexes.

WHAT IS VOICE MAIL AND WHY DOYOU NEED IT?by Dona Jones

VOICE MAIL SUBSCRIBERS AT SLAC now num-ber approximately 700. If you're not presently usingVoice Mail and want to know more about it, maybethe following questions and answers will help clarifywhat this service can do for you.

What Is Voice Mail?Voice Mail is an electronic voice-messaging system

that provides an easy, fast and dependable way to com-municate with people both inside and outside yourorganization performing the same function, and more,as your telephone answering machine without an exter-nal device. If you are not available to take calls, VoiceMail plays your personal greeting, takes messages auto-matically and stores them for pickup at your conve-nience, no matter where you are. If you are sick or planto be away from SLAC, you can change your personalgreeting every day, giving callers accurate informationabout when you will return. If you want to have yourcallers speak to a live person rather than leave a mes-sage, Voice Mail offers the option to press "0" and yourcallers will be forwarded to a secretary's telephone, inmost cases, or you can specify the number of someoneelse in your office to call in your absence.

(Cont'd. on p. 10)

5

Page 6: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

Better, cheaper, and faster

INTEGRATING CAD/CAM WITH OUR FUTUREby Carl Rago

THE MECHANICAL SYSTEMSpart of the Technical Division,with indirect support from theMechanical and Industrial Engi-neering departments at Stanford,is proposing changes in our tradi-tional approaches to mechanicaldesign and production. Utilizing avariety of high-tech tools, we aredeveloping a tailored and integrat-ed approach to the production ofinstruments and mechanicalequipment. This new mechanismprovides a consistent vehicle tocarry projects from their initialconcept through design, manufac-turing, and quality assurance, and

_, x J I

finally to document control. While In the first phase of the CAD/CAM integrated approach to instrument design and manufac-new mechanical tools have come ture at SLAC, Scott DeBarger, mechanical engineer, and Joe Stieber, mechanical designer,

n-se fr t l 1 y , i i develop the initial computer model. The CAD/CAM electronic connection and format allowson-site or the last t years, IS the concept to be sent back and forth to a production person for evaluation. Such communi-

only during the last three to five cation may happen many times before the final design is arrived at.years that we made a seriousattempt to tie all phases of produc-.- - . .1 * , ·L - -_ '_ - _ I * 1 1 -1

tlon together into an cieallzea sys-tem. This new managementinitiative, essentially a reorganiza-tion of workflow, is a powerfulconcept that improves all aspectsof working relationships and pro-vides a variety of secondary bene-fits to all involved parties.

The status of the Americanmachine tool industry generallydeclined during the past fewdecades, but SLAC's demand forhigh-quality, extremely accurate,and sophisticated designs andequipment steadily increased. Asthe formidable machine tools usedfor production of the linac aged,the Mechanical FabricationDepartment (MFD) turned to high-tech solutions to meet changingdemands and dwindling person-nol rocn11rr cV'I LICJ1 I C t-O L1 C-

In the mid-seventies, computer Next, the CAD model is given to a programmer-here Noli Jose-who generates the CAMnumerically controlled (CNC) program which controls the machine tool. The programmer does quick tests and offers

practical design alterations before formal drawings and full details have been committed.(Cont'd. on p. 7)

6

Page 7: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

(Cont'd. from p. 6)

machine tools came to SLAC. Tosupport these new machine-tools,a line-code-driven software systemcalled Automatic ProgrammedTools (APT) was installed on theSCS mainframe. Machine-tooloperations were coded-usuallyby specially trained machinists-to match a programmer's interpre-tation of a blueprint. APT was aproductive and versatile system,and SLAC slowly expanded its useof CNC machines under the tute-lage of APT.

Production improvements fos-tered by APT were balancedagainst a system complexity thatseverely limited the input ofmachinists, virtually isolatingthem from the design process.Only select staff had access to thesystem, and design changesfocused on necessary correctionsrather than specific improvements.Engineers and designers similarlyremained isolated from the pro-duction process. Communicationand constructive interplay rarelyoccurred, thus abetting the tradi-tional us-and them-organization.

In the eighties, a re-examina-tion of the manufacturing process,and innovations, and improve-ments in computers and softwareled to techniques which includesdesigners, engineers, and machin-ists in the production process. Bet-ter, cheaper, and faster becamebywords of a new way to work,and through interplay betweendesign and production personnel,the integrated system is a reality.

The platform for an integratedsystem at SLAC is provided by theIntergraph Corporation. Initiallylimited to a Computer AidedDesign/Computer Aided Manu-facturing (CAD/CAM) system,Intergraph first found its way toSLAC in design groups and wassoon being evaluated by MFD. Thefirst operational Intergraph sta-

During the CAD/CAM integrated design process, a continual flow of information occursbetween the designers, the programmers, and the operators, to ensure the best possibleend result. The final phase takes the design to the machinist-in this case Leroy Andrade-who operates the machine tool to generate the end product, a machine part that goes intothe linac.

tions were crude and difficult tooperate by today's standards, andmany years away from our expec-tations. As a result, the fully opera-tional (and familiar) APTcontinued as the preferred systemfor a number of years.

In the last three years, designand manufacturing personnelworked hard to improve and vali-date the Intergraph system as aproduction tool. We have demon-strated engineering models thatpassed through design into pro-duction with fully functional andpractical features. Much hardwareand software has been added andchanged, but the greatest changehas been our increased focus onthe overall interrelationship of thedesign/production processes.

We now have a workable Inter-graph CAD/CAM system. Ourshort-term goals are to continue todemonstrate and expand the useof the system, and to install themetrics that will direct continualimprovements as SLAC's technolo-gy and demands change. Our ulti-

mate goal is a system which makesthe best use of computers and newtechnology-not only for the sin-gle-part phase of the design/pro-duction process, but also for theentire process.

The benefits of a successfulycoordinated operation are evident.Documentation, maintenance,traceability, cycle time, and costare all potentially improvedthrough the application of an inte-grated system. Increased involve-ment through the CAD/CAMsystem also brings greater satisfac-tion (and less general frustration)to every staff member throughimproved understanding andincreased respect for a coworker'srole in a project. SLAC must matchthese tools with foresight and con-sistent direction to turn technolog-ical innovation into continualimprovement and a practicalframework for the future.

To find out more about Inter-graph CAD/CAM and its applica-tions here, contact John Gracia,ext. 4281, or Carl Rago, ext. 3636.

7

n

Cc:

c

Page 8: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

SSRL STUDIES RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROBLEMA NEW FACILITY at the Stanford Synchrotron Radi-ation Laboratory uses its x-ray beams to study thestorage of radioactive wastes. In an effort to determinehow to protect the earth from this contamination,Stanford geologists Gordon Brown and George Parkshave organized the Center for Environmental andEnergy Related Science and Technology.

"There have been all sorts of hare-brained schemesto get rid of waste," says Brown. "Put it in the oceans,shoot it off into space in rockets." But these also canbackfire, spewing contamination into the environment.

So long-term storage appears to be the only solu-tion. It has entered the public spotlight recently asnuclear power plants try to handle billions of gallonsof waste which will remain radioactive for at least10,000 years.

Nuclear power plants now store their hazardouswaste temporarily on-site in huge vats. A plant inHanford, Washington holds 177 million gallons-enough to fill about a thousand Olympic-sized swim-ming pools-in metal tanks. The liquids have beenmixed and transferred so many times that plant man-agers no longer even know what kinds of materialsare in each tank.

"They have a very complex mixture of stuff andthey don't know what it is," says Brown. "There aretanks up there that are burping hydrogen. Big burpsof hydrogen. This could be very explosive."

A long-term storage remedy is clearly needed. Thecurrent plan is to bury all the waste in huge tanksdeep inside Yucca Mountain in Nevada, hoping thetanks will not be disturbed for the next ten millennia.

But Brown worries more about the radioactivewaste migrating away from the site on its own, andless about people inadvertently digging up the tanks.

"They want to put the waste in a place with theleast seismic activity, the least chance of a volcaniceruption, the least rainfall, the least chance of flood-ing," he says. "But this is not foolproof."

The waste itself can eat through the tanks, causingthem to leak pollution. Groundwater flowing by could

carry the waste away and contaminate wells and rivers.Brown thinks burying the waste is a good solution,

but additional barriers are needed. "We assume thatwater will come in contact with the waste at somepoint," he says. So he wants to ensure that the waterwon't pick up the waste as it flows by.

Water absorbs different metals and compounds indifferent circumstances, just as salt dissolves in hotwater more quickly than cold. So different metalsmight dissolve more quickly in water that is moreacidic. Flowing water may or may not pick upradioactive waste depending on these factors. Buryingwaste in conditions where it will never dissolve inwater could effectively contain the waste.

The Center uses intense x-rays, known as synchro-tron radiation, to study what dissolves in what. The x-raysbounce off samples made of some radioactive materi-al, water and perhaps clay or concrete. Re-searcherscan tell, on a molecular level, whether the radioactivewaste sticks to the clay or dissolves in the water.

Synchrotron radiation is necessary because it is theonly x-ray source that does not require the sample tobe in a vacuum, which would be impossible forBrown's samples, which include water.

The Center has so far found that some hazardouswastes bind tightly to iron oxides when placed inhighly acidic solutions.

"So using iron oxides," says Brown, "might be aneffective barrier."

The Center hopes to find similar barrier possibili-ties for the many types of nuclear waste-uraniumand cesium, to name just two.

"We are trying to understand the effect of all thesedifferent variables on the metal absorption-whatsticks and what doesn't stick, and how strongly theystick," says Brown.

Once all these variables have been determined,Brown hopes to build detailed computer models todetermine how far the waste might travel in groundwater, and whether it can be contained.

-Karen Fox

5

Page 9: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: AN EXPLANATIONSUEVON GEE, SLAC's Affirma-tive Action Officer, recently pre-sented a brief background of EqualEmployment Opportunity (EEO) ata noontime talk sponsored by theWomen's Interchange at SLAC(WIS). The EEO Program, formedas a result of the Civil Rights Actof 1964, deals with non-discrimi-nation in the workplace. This per-tains to all aspects of employment,such as selection, promotion, ter-mination, and benefits. The Affir-mation Action (AA) Program, theresult of a Presidential order,focuses on past discrimination andits effect on protected groups.

SLAC's Affirmative ActionOffice reports to the LaboratoryDirector and has a peer relation-ship with the Personnel Depart-ment and the Associate Directors.The Director presides over anyconflicts among these groups.

The challenge faced by SueVonin implementing both EEO and AAis to correct the effects of past dis-crimination while practicing non-discrimination. As an example, shedescribed how EEO/AA worksduring the employment selectionprocess. During the interview andselection process, EEO (nondis-crimination) is in effect. AA mayenter into an employment selec-tion when two candidates aredetermined to be qualified. Under

EEO no one group has preferenceover another for selection, promo-tion, termination, or layoff.

In answer to a question regard-ing the AA Office's involvement inselection of physicists, SueVonindicated that physicists on atenure track are selected by theStanford University faculty andthe AA Office is not involved. If aphysicist is on the staff track, how-ever, SueVon may be involved inthe selection process via the nor-mal requisition process.

SueVon said that given the longstanding of EEO/AA, she is disap-pointed with the progress that thiscountry has made. There has beenmore progress in EEO than in AA.This may be due to the fact thatsome people do not agree that AAis the best approach to equality.For instance, in the last ten yearsmuch of the funding for communi-ty organizations and job trainingprograms has been cut back oreliminated.

SLAC's Affirmative Action,Summer Science Program, YouthOpportunity Program, WorkStudy Program, and Apprentice-ships are examples of programsthat historically have been aimedat minorities and women. SLACalso participates in various pro-grams such as the National Con-sortium for Engineering whichencourages minorities to get agraduate degree in engineering.

Because these programs are noton the critical path for high-energyphysics research, their support andsurvival is dependent primarily onthe availability of resources andthe overall SLAC managementcommitment to EEO/AA.

SueVon reported that ten yearsago 17% of the SLAC populationwas female. Today 21% is female.The Affirmative Action Office hashistorically focused on diversity inoccupational areas rather than onincreasing numbers. SueVon stat-

SueVon Gee, SLAC Affirmative ActionOfficer.

ed that diversity, as well asprogress in numbers, is challeng-ing because the following factorsaffect success and rapid progress:

· Opportunity for change-theturnover rate is traditionally lowat SLAC (currently at 6.8%).

* Support is dependent onmanagement and its willingnessCEto make EEO/AA a high priority.

* Availability-what is theeducation system and labormarkCEet turning out with regardto minorities and women? It is not-ed that in the last ten years all stu-dents (particularly minorities andwomen) are moving away fromthe sciences and going into busi-ness, law, and social science stud-ies. This trend affects the availablepool of minorities and womenfrom which SLAC can selectemployees.

SueVon finds it more effectiveto deal with individuals ratherthan groups because there is ahigher probability of finding a spe-cific solution. If you would like tofind out more about AffirmativeAction or you have specific ques-tions, feel free to schedule anappointment with SueVon Gee atext. 2967.

-Janet Dixon and Cherrill Spencer

9

uD

11

Page 10: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

Murray Hargain Passed AwayMURRAY HARGAIN of the Lab-oratory Electronics Group passedaway last October 31. A long-timeemployee of SLAC, he was coaxedaway from the Chicago synchro-tron thirty years ago by BurtonRichter to help with early researchand development on collidingbeams here.

Murray started as a technicianin the electronic field, specificallywith the electronics systems forthe photo-production experimentswhich the Richter group did withthe big spectrometers in End Sta-tion A. From there, Murray movedon to work on the R&D leading upto the SPEAR storage ring. He final-ly moved from Group C to theLaboratory Electronics Group

Cont'd from p. 5

Why Should I ConsiderVoice Mail?

In a single action, twenty-fourhours a day, you can pick up mes-sages left by both internal andexternal callers. You can send mes-sages, reply to messages and senda copy of a message to other sub-scribers at SLAC with continuousflow and confidentiality, becauseyour mailbox is protected by yourpersonal password. All of thesefeatures and more can be donefrom your desk, home or any-where you have access to a touch-tone phone. Voice Mail answersyour phone when it is in a no-answer or busy condition. Withthe no-answer the caller gets theVoice Mail greeting after four

go:^. ^^^^J

when the electronics component ofGroup C was reduced. Throughhis efforts at SLAC, Murrayreceived the distinction of leadtechnician.

Murray realized many personalgoals during his career at SLAC.He attended a special program atStanford that led to a MastersDegree in electrical engineering,an accomplishedment that he wasproud of. As Richter said, "He rosethrough the ranks from technicianto engineer."

Murray was a quiet andreserved man who, according toTony Bell, had interests in jazzmusic and liked to reminisce aboutthe culture of the '50s and '60s. Hissteady character will be missed.

rings; with a busy signal, VoiceMail will promptly inform thecaller that you are on the phoneand that the caller may leave amessage of any length. Do youwant to have one greeting for youroutside callers and another foryour internal callers? It's easy withVoice Mail. Is there a message youwant sent to several people? It'seasy with the broadcast messageoption; simply create a distribu-tion list following the prompts,and broadcast your message toeveryone at one time. Is there amessage you want to send at a lat-er date? No problem, because youcreate the message and establishthe date and time to send the mes-sage and Voice Mail does the rest.

What is the cost? Telecommuni-cations has made it easy. Thecharges for this service are paidfrom an overhead account and arenot charged back to your depart-ment.

How Easy Is It To Use?Very. No more memorizing of

commands. The prompts from thesystem tell you exactly what to do.

Murray is survived by hismother, Willa Garner; two sons,Murray, Jr. and Anthony; twostepdaughters, Yvette M. Gibbsand Yolanda M. Zesati; fourgrandchildren, and many friendswho cherish his memory.

-Trevor Payne

You always know when you havea new message either by a mes-sage waiting light, if you have oneon your phone, or by a stutter dialtone when you pick up the receiv-er. And remember, all features ofVoice Mail can be activated fromany touch-tone phone worldwide.

Who Do I Call For MoreInformation?

Once Voice Mail for yourphone is approved, activationtakes approximately 10 days. Noone comes to your office or dis-rupts your schedule, as all the nec-essary actions are done byTelecommunications in the SCSBuilding. Voice Mail is available(but not required) to anyone inter-ested, providing they get approvalfrom their group leader or depart-ment head. Also, to add or changeexisting Voice Mail service, or getanswers to questions about VoiceMail call Mike Telang, SLAC'sTelecommunications Analyst atext. 2254 or your AdministrativeTelecommunications Office Moti-vator (ATOM).

Dona Jones

10

a

Q~_s7;

Page 11: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

SERA FACES IMMINENT CRISESTHE SLAC EMERGENCY ReliefAssociation (SERA) faces a finan-cial crisis, and we need your help.

The source of this crisis is two-fold: many long-time membersare retiring, and there have been alarger than usual number of seri-ous problems that needed our helpduring the last six months. Recent-ly, it was necessary to turn downindividuals whose emergency con-ditions would certainly have quali-fied them for assistance, had webeen able to give it. The simplefact is, we had no money to give.

SERA is a non-profit, tax-deductible charity formed by SLACemployees in 1968 to aid those ofthe SLAC community whose finan-cial condition has become desper-ate due to emergencies beyondtheir control. It is entirely run byvolunteers, who serve an 18-monthterm, and ALL donations go di-rectly to those in need-there areno overhead costs.

Presently, approximately 80percent of the grants are repaidwithin one or two years. SERA hasrecovered from its zero balance,but is still seriously low in fundson hand. The decrease in dona-tions due to retirement of ourmembers is going to continue, asthose who have long supported us

take early retirement, and it is rea-sonable to expect that in thesehard times the need will continueto be great.

SERA is primarily dependent onthe donations of its membership.We urge you to join us in thiseffort. A $6 lump-sum donation, ora payroll deduction of 50 cents permonth, makes you a full votingmember of SERA. Of course, a larg-er lump-sum or monthly donationwould be most welcome (the cur-rent average is $2.50 per month).Some of you will prefer to make alump-sum donation, while othersprefer to authorize a modest pay-roll deduction-in both cases yourdonation is fully tax-deductible. Ifyou who are already a member ofSERA, you might consider anincrease in your current donation(even a modest increase wouldhelp greatly).

SERA has always stood ready tohelp those of in need of a helpinghand. Now SERA needs your sup-port. Please send your lump-sumdonation to SERA in care of ZorabVassilian, Treasurer (ext. 2464), atMS 12, or clip the coupon below,fill in your donation, and drop it inthe mail today!

-Shirley Boozer

CONTRIBUTION TO SLAC EMERGENCY RELIEF ASSOCIATIONI want to do my part to HELP!i My check is enclosed. J I would like to donate $

to SERA.l I authorize a payroll deduction of $ per month for SERA,

to continue until further notice.

(Signature)

(Please print name) (Date) (Employee number)

RETURN TO SLAC EMERGENCY RELIEF ASSOCIATION (SERA), MS 12.For more information call or write: P. Mokski, Secretary, ext. 2965.

11

-------------------------------------------

Page 12: ^Interaction Point February 1993, Vol. 4, No. 2 Events and ... - SLAC€¦ · everything worked smashingly (no pun intended), and not one target cell blew up in the electron beam

Joan Retires: Another Earth-Shaking Event

c-

WAS THAT AN EARTHQUAKEthe evening of January 15, or theculmination of Joan Dammann's27 years of service as the nurse inthe Medical Department?

Whatever the cause, during abrief sunny respite from twoweeks of torrential rains, approxi-mately 150 employees, specialguests from Palo Alto MedicalClinic (PAMC), and sixteen faith-ful retirees met at the main hall ofIR8 for a luncheon send-off forJoan. Thanks are due to the many

people who were instrumental inarranging this function. It wasgreat fun working with all of you.

Glenn Tenney and Doctor Mar-garet Deanesly presided over theceremonies, calling upon J. BertRose, Assistant Administrator ofthe Palo Alto Medical Clinic, BurtRichter, Director of SLAC, and PiefPanofsky, Director Emeritus ofSLAC, for their words of wisdomand good wishes.

Joan joined the staff of thePAMC in 1966. She and DoctorRobert Armbruster were instru-mental in setting up the MedicalDepartment here at SLAC, withPAMC providing most of the sup-plies.

In his farewell address J. BertRose stated that "Joan (or Joan ofSLAC, as he has called her for 27years), was a most important partof the clinic at SLAC. She kept ittogether and worked towards pro-viding excellent medical care forthe patients and employees." Hecontinued, "Her success wasexemplified by the number of peo-ple from all walks who appearedat her retirement party."

Joan, a Certified OccupationalHealth Nurse, is affiliated with theCalifornia El Camino Real Associa-tion of Occupational Health Nurs-es (AOHN), South Bay, and theNorthern California, CaliforniaState, and American (national)AOHN. She served on past boardsof the Mountain Western AOHN asPresident and Secretary.

Joan also served on the SLACSafety Committee and set up vari-ous health-oriented programs overthe years for the employees. Sheprovided First Aid coverage atannual on-site Family Days.

Joan was presented with aSLAC watch by Burt Richter. Shewas also given a coveted beam treeand some crystal goblets from theattendees.

Doctor Margaret's farewell toJoan, which she offered at theretirement party and reiterated onJoan's last official day here, wasbased on these popular songs:Thanks for the Memories, I'm soGlad We've Had This TimeTogether, and, Joan, You Are theWind Beneath My Wings.

Best wishes, Joan!Marion Lisotto

12