Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    1/143

    Photo: CJ Carter

    In October of 1999 best friends Alex Lowe and Conrad Anker were overcome by anavalanche in the Tibetan Himalaya. Conrad barely survived the avalanche and soonbegan to suffer from Survivors Guilt. In the months following the tragedy, Conrad andAlexs widow, Jennifer tried to comfort each other and unexpectedly found love.

    Alexs death was but one of many tragedies that unfold when families lose loved onesin the mountains. The celebrated high altitude Sherpa families suffer this same fatemore than any other group as they work at extreme altitude for Western expeditions.In honor of Alexs legacy Jennifer and Conrad seek meaning beyond tragedy with amountaineering school for Sherpas and high altitude workers - The Khumbu ClimbingSchool.1

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    2/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    In

    ct

    n i h E r

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    3/143

    3

    Introduction

    t

    o c o Photo: CJ Carter

    There is always a mediuma common ground through which two dissimilar culturescan connect. For this project, that medium is climbing. The Sherpa have beenassisting ascents of Mount Everest since the beginning of its legacy as an object ofconquest. Both natives of the Himalaya and foreigners aspire to achieve the goal that

    it presents. But the mountain takes many lives. Irrespective of race or creed, peoplesof the east and west alike have perished on its slopes. However circumstances havemade the Sherpa an unsuspecting target for the mountains temper. Approximatelyone-third of all of the lives claimed by Mount Everest have been Sherpa.3 And yetthese people are the greatest asset to every individual that comes to set their sightson its peak.

    Climbing is not simply a means of employment for the Sherpa, it is an opportunity tohave fun. And through the joy that this type of recreational climbing brings, a cultureis strengthened and its ties to other cultures are deepened.

    The Khumbu Climbing School has taken place now for over five years, training theSherpa in how to climb safely and enjoyably. While an impact has been made, only somuch can be done on a dusty snowy field without facilities. As word of the school hasspread, more and more Sherpa have become interested in climbing and participating.With greater numbers attending, there is a need for a building where the Sherpa cancome to learn and to climb. That is where this project begins.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    4/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    5/143

    INTERACTING WITH EXTREME ENVIRONS VOLUME 2:INTEGRATED DESIGN PROPOSALS FOR

    THE KHUMBU CLIMBING SCHOOL

    NEPAL

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    6/143

    SCHOOL

    OF

    ARCHITECTURE

    Published by the School of Architecture at Montana State University (MSU).

    2008 Montana State University. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.

    This book was submitted by Chris Hancock, Justina Hohmann, Dylan McQuinn, Jaron Mickolio, Sarah Mohland, Nick Molinaro, Dean Soderberg, and Emily Van Court aseducational credit for the Interacting with Extreme Environs design/build studio.

    Instructor: Assistant Professor of Architecture Michael Everts AIA, NCARB

    Project Supporters: MSU Division of Graduate Education, MSU College of Arts and Architecture, NCARB Grand Prize Award 2006, MSU School of Architecture, ChrisBergum

    Unless otherwise noted, all photographs in this book were taken by members of this studio.

    Cover image taken by Heather Archer (modified by Dylan McQuinn).Opposite image taken by C. J. Carter.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    7/143

    7

    ABSTRACT 9

    CULTURAL IDENTITY 15

    EDUCATIONAL JOURNEY 25

    PERFORMANCEARCHITECTURE

    37

    BUILDING USE 43

    ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 49

    BUILDING FORM 65

    MATERIAL AND

    STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 75DESIGN PROPOSALS 99

    THE NEXT STEP 125

    APPENDIX 133

    NOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 139

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    8/143

    1

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    9/143

    9

    Project Brief 10

    Introduction 11

    People/Social Resource Map 12

    Purpose: To present several performance-based design proposals for the KhumbuClimbing School in Phortse, Nepal.

    Performance Question: How can new technologies, which increase warmth andstructural safety from earthquakes, and new uses, such as climbing education,reading, and medical training, not only be integrated with, but reinforce the existingtraditional forms, uses, and materials that define the Sherpa identity?

    Concept: Pairing the usually conflicting attributes of old and new through the use of

    design strategies, such as view manipulation, skill capacity equalization, and methodfamiliarization, can create solutions that simultaneously strengthen traditional identityand enhance performance.

    Thesis: Heritage-dependant design strategies integrate the existing Sherpa identitywith new forms, materials, and construction methods that are safer, perform betterenvironmentally than existing architecture, and incorporate new uses.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    10/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    PROJECT BRIEF

    Main Collaborators: Alex LoweCharitable Foundation, MSU School ofArchitecture

    Location: Phortse, Nepal

    Size: 2500 square feet

    Estimated Completion Date: 2009

    Land Doners: Lhakpa Sherpa, PanuruSherpa

    Use: climbing school, climbing trainingand recreation, community events, library,potato seedling testing and dispersal

    Factors of Influence: tradition andculture, safety, warmth

    ALEX LOWE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

    Alex Lowe was not only one of the great alpinists of his time, he was also a manwho had a remarkable impact on many of the people indigenous to the high mountainregions where his expeditions took him. Alex was blessed with many unique giftsincluding the ability to climb the worlds most challenging peaks, and the capability toconnect with, and love, the people he met in some of the most remote areas of theworld. His sheer enthusiasm for adventure and compassion for the difficult lives led

    by these people stands as a continuing inspiration for those who knew and admiredAlex.

    The Alex Lowe Charitable Foundation (ALCF) is dedicated to preserving his legacy byproviding direction and financial support to susta inable, community-based humanitarianprograms designed to help the people who live in remote regions of the world. Thisfoundation carries on Alexs spirit of adventure.2

    KHUMBU CLIMBING SCHOOL MISSION STATEMENT

    To increase the safety margin of Nepali climbers and high altitude workers by

    encouraging responsible climbing practices in a supportive and community-basedprogram.3

    5

    6

    MSU SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE MISSION STATEMENT

    The mission of the School of Architecture is to prepare students for the lifelong criticalengagement in the arts and science of architecture. We teach and practice a moral,ethical and aesthetic responsibility to society and the natural world in the design of thebuilt environment.

    To that end, we empower students to assume a leadership role in the synthesisof human activity, place, materials, systems, theories and methods from a critical,responsible and mature perspective. Concurrently, we strive to support the faculty inthe active engagement in creative and research activities that advance the mission ofthe school and the university.4

    7

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    11/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    12/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    13/143

    13

    Introduction

    Means+Methods

    B u i l d i n g U s e

    E n v i r o n m e n t a l

    S y s t e m s

    B u i l d i n g F o r m

    M a t e r i a l

    S y s t e m s

    Lisel ClarkMagic Yeti Library

    Lila BishopEnglish Program

    Dr. Luanne FreerEverest ER

    Lhakpa Norbu

    Lhakpa Dorji

    Peter JankeArchitect

    Chhongba Sherpa

    Marie WilsonArchitect

    Bob MechelsArchitect

    Hadrian PredockArchitect

    Chris BergumArchitectSteffan Dorsling

    Architect

    Reed KroloffDirector of Cranbrook Universtiy

    Anders LarssonMSU COE Professor

    John CooneyMSU COE Student

    Britney GilesMSU COE Student

    Tom KujawaMSU COE Student

    Bill GreyMSU Plants Sciences

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    14/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    Photo: CJ Carter

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    15/143

    15

    Cultural Identity

    Sherpa Cultural Identity 16

    Khumbu Geospatial Profile 17

    Traditional Use 18

    Traditional Construction 19Village Organization 20

    Phortse Architype 20

    The success of this project depended upon collaboration with many individualsand groups, including the Alex Lowe Charitable Foundation and its affiliates, otherdepartments within Montana State University, and guest critics. Specific architecturalprocesses and strategies were chosen and executed based on appropriateness,resultant capacities, and student capabilities.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    16/143

    SHERPACULTURAL IDENTITY

    Sherpa culture derived from ancestralroots in the Khams region of Tibet.Devotion to the sacred traditions ofHimalayan Buddhism was a factor intheir exodus across the highest terrainon the planet to settle in the remotevalleys of the Solu-Khumbu in the1500s. Their identity is dependant upon

    a fragile relationship with their extremeenvironment.

    - http://www.everyculture.com/South-Asia/Sherpa-History-and-Cultural-Relations.html- Stevens, Stanley F. Claiming the high ground : Sherpas, subsistence, and environmental change in the highest Himalaya. 1993. University of California Press.

    Foreign influences have affected thevulnerable Sherpa culture in ways bothdetrimental and beneficial. The westernincursions of the 1800s introducedtrade and occupational commerce.The contemporary forces of the late1900s brought new forms of industry:mountaineering and tourism. Each

    era brings new opportunities andchallenges.

    The intent of the Khumbu ClimbingSchool reflects the desire to offer aconscientious building that will providebenefits toward the consolidation andstabilization of the Sherpa cultural identity

    as it continues to evolve with the modernworld.

    The global influences on the Khumburegion have caused a radical adaptationand integration process of the Sherpacultural assemblage. The Sherpa desiresome of the elements of modernity.They want to live more comfortablelives and be economically sustainable.Globalization has had an effect on the

    Sherpa culture, but through effectivedesign decisions and processes they can

    Khumbu Timeline

    maintain a distinct, culturally sustainableidentity.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    17/143

    17

    Cultural Identity

    Phortse

    Lukla

    TengbocheMonastery

    Western Tourism Sherpa emigration to Darjeeling

    Tibetan Refugees

    Phortse

    Namche Bazar

    Phortse

    Dingboche

    Chomolungma

    (Mt.Everest)

    Pangboche

    TIBET MIGRATION

    Chomolungma

    (Mt.Everest)

    Chomolungma

    (Mt.Everest)

    Phortse

    TengbocheMonastery

    ( t. Ev r t)

    british-tibet trade route

    Nepalese govtadministrative districts

    Sagarmatha Natl Park

    KHUMBUGEOSPATIAL PROFILE

    Record of visitors to the Sagarmatha National Park displayed at the park entrance

    Historical events have shaped the geo-spatial distribution of the Sherpas inthe Khumbu Valley. Each event helpsto territorialize or de-territorialize theircultural identity.

    For many years the village of Phortsehas been dissociated from the Everest

    base camp trail and is experiencinga de-territorializing force from thecontemporary factors of western tourismand mountaineering.

    1900s CONTEMPORARY FORCES

    Sagarmatha National Park (est.1974)

    Lukla Airport (1964)

    5000 Tibetan refugees enter Khumbuafter Chinese occupation (1959)

    Hillary/Norgay summit Everest (1953)

    Shaha Dynasty encourages westerntourism and mountaineering (1952)

    Tengboche Monastery founded (1916)

    Sherpa emigration to Darjeeling(1900)

    1500s EARLY MIGRATIONS

    Pangboche and Dingboche - meditativeretreats

    Phortse first settled (1533)

    Sherpa initial emigration from Khamsregion in Tibet

    1800s WESTERN INCURSIONS

    Nepalese Government divides Khumbuinto separate administrative districts(1886)

    Irish potato introduced into region (pop.increases)

    Namche Bazar founded (1828)British/India est. trade routes to Tibet

    To help offset these de-territorializingforces and help stabilize the culturalidentity of Phortse, the Khumbu ClimbingSchool will act as a community centerand offer such services as showers anda library. Ideally, the school will becomea destination and help to invite moretourism and economic value to Phortse,

    while simultaneously preserving itscultural heritage. The project will be aconsolidating factor that will strengthenand enhance the community identity.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    18/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    TRADITIONAL USE

    Buildings in the Sherpa culture are usedfor living and gathering. They provideminimal protection from the elementsand are designed to accommodate thebasic needs of their lifestyle.

    Homes and lodges contain sleepingspace, a kitchen, and gathering space for

    eating and drinking tea. Larger buildingscontain more area for gathering spaces.Many of their buildings, large and small,contain separate religious spaces forprayer. Traditional architecture originallyincorporated space for animals on thefirst floor, but this is changing.

    1111

    11

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    19/143

    19

    Cultural Identity

    TRADITIONAL

    CONSTRUCTION

    Construction in the Khumbu is limited byavailable tools and material transportation.Everything must be carried on the backsof porters or yaks to the site. Buildingsare constructed by hand using mostlystone and wood: stone is harvestedfrom local quarries and carved, wood ishand-chiselled, and every piece is hand-placed. Skilled craftsmen live throughoutthe Khumbu and the quality of their workis determined by the cost of construction.Buildings are cold and drafty from thedry-stack stone construction and lack ofinsulation, as well as structurally unsafe.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    20/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    21/143

    21

    Cultural Identity

    ROOF ORIENTATION TERRAIN

    The culturally archetypal buildings inPhortse all are aligned parallel with thetopography. The town slopes downto the South-West, giving the villageeast-west topography. The southern-most facade is the primary fenestratedface of the building, and thereforeestablishes the axis by which the buildingis elongated. The resulting short north-south axis and elongated East-West axisallows for maximum daylight penetration.The doors are typically placed on thesouth face, but are more flexible in theirplacement than the windows.

    Because the landscape of Phortseslopes, the buildings are dug into theterrain, allowing for both thermal andmaterial efficiency. Buildings are set intothe terrain at roughly half their depth andheight, making it possible to connect thesecond story with the terrain at the rearof the building.

    The Sherpa culture was traditionally oneof agricultural vocation which is reflectedin their built environment. To the south

    of most buildings is an area of openland that receives the most sunlightand historically is used to dry, sort, andtemporarily store buckwheat, rice, andmillet.

    Dwellings are crowned with a lowpitched ridge roof that ends in either agable or hip. Gable roofs typically havean eyebrow, or built-up continuation ofthe eaves along the facade beneath thegable.

    The L-shaped forms have a hip andvalley condition at the junction of the twomodules.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    22/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    We studied the relationship of openingsto mass proportions of the buildings ofPhortse and found that most any facadeproportion typically had 3-4 windowson the upper level that were of a typical

    small rectangular shape. There also wereinstances where an elongated windowwas used in which cases typically only2-3 windows were used.

    There is a more or less independentrelationship of organization between theupper and lower level openings in thebuildings of Phortse, Openings roughlyever stack structurally but vary widely in

    both number and alignment with regardto the upper story.

    HERITAGE PLANE COMPOSITION

    The Sherpas historical vocation wasagriculture which necessitated finding ormaking arable land. As a result the typicaltown sites were south-facing shelves atthe threshold between the mountain andthe river gorges. These shelves howeverwere not level enough to be viable fieldsfor crops and needed to be built intoterraces to help facilitate the agriculturalprocess and soil maintenance.

    The built landscape is a reflection of theSherpas reconciliation with the extremenature of their environment. Becausethese shelves were chosen for theiraccess to sunlight for crops, Phortsesbuildings take advantage of the villagesorientation towards the sun for light andheat.

    MOUNTAIN PEAKS

    PHORTSE PLATEAU

    RIVER GORGE

    HERITAGE PLANE COMPOSITION

    TERRACING

    TERRAFORMED LAND MANIPULATION

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    23/143

    23

    Cultural Identity

    DATUM PROPORTIONSROOF PATTERNING

    The gable roof is common to all dwellingsin Phortse. As such it is a dominatesthe visual language of Phortse. Theroof is the one element that is seen fromall perspectives around the building.Because the roof is such a pervasiveelement, it deserves special considerationas to how it will be viewed.Our studies took into account parallelviews as well as perspectives aroundand above the building to accountfor the organizational logics as wellas the experiential nature of dynamicviewpoints.

    The datum is a pervasive logic in thePhortse archetype. This low linear roofline as well as the alignment of windowsfrom the eaves of the roof establishesa strong datum. On the gable end, the

    datum is continued through an eyebrow.A secondary logic present in most everybuilding is a symmetry of the facade withregards to openings and accentuated bythe gable ends.

    The basic massing of the buildings inPhortse fall in to four typical lengthssome more common than others. Theproportions are primarily a result of theneed for maximum southern exposure

    so tend to form elongated masses 2-3times wide as they are tall.

    *4

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    24/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    25/143

    25

    Project Timeline 27Site Research: Visit 1 28

    Design Charrette: Visit 2 30

    Design Studio: Fall 2008 34

    The success of this project depended on collaboration with many individuals andgroups, including the Alex Lowe Charitable Foundation and its affiliates, otherdepartments within Montana State University, and guest critics. Specific architecturalprocesses and strategies were chosen and executed based on appropriateness,resultant capacities, and student capabilities.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    26/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    Jan 2008 Aug 2008 Jan 2009 Aug 2009 Jan 2010

    CONSTRUCTION

    Mike and Bob

    Fall 08 Design Team

    Spring 09 Design Team

    Heather and Marie

    MSU ACADEMIC TEAM

    Mike and Bob

    Spring 2009 Design Team

    V

    Breaking ground

    PROCESS

    V

    V

    B

    Visit 3: present 4 schemes

    Visit 2: design charrette

    Visit 1: site, school, and cultural research

    CDs and Mock-ups

    Environmental

    Cultural

    RESEARCH

    Structure

    Building Form

    Use

    Materials

    Environmental Systems

    Means and Methods

    PERFORMANCE-DRIVEN ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    Build Climbing School

    Performance-driven Design

    PROJECT TIMELINE

    This diagram shows the times at whichcertain people and design processeswere involved in the project. See socialresource map (p.12-13) for complete listof contributors.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    27/143

    27

    Educational Journey

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    28/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    SITE RESEARCH:

    VISIT 1

    1

    2

    3

    4 6

    During the January 2008 session of theKhumbu Climbing School, MSU studentHeather Archer and MSU graduateMarie Wilson trekked to Phortse, Nepalto research the site and see the schoolin action. They also explored the cultureof the Sherpa and spent over a weekwith them, learning about the people andtheir lives. These images are merely a

    glimpse into what they saw.

    Upon their return, Heather wrote the firstvolume of Interacting with ExtremeEnvirons to record their research andtrip. It describes the history of the AlexLowe Charitable Foundation and theKhumbu Climbing School, as well asdocuments the site and the program forthe building design. Further researchinto Sherpa culture and architecture was

    also included. See Interacting withExtreme Environs Volume 1 for moreinformation.

    5

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    29/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    30/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    DESIGN CHARRETTE:

    VISIT 2In August of 2008, MSU graduatestudents Justina Hohmann, DylanMcQuinn, Sarah Mohland, and NickMolinaro travelled with MSU ProfessorMichael Everts to Phortse, Nepal to holda design charrette with the local Sherpacommunity. The map to the right showsthe trekking route of the group. Alongthe way they ammassed nearly 6000

    photographs, some of which are shownbelow.

    A design charrette is a collaborativearchitectural process where architects,clients, consultants, and other projectaffiliates work together on a portion ofthe design process. Usually this takesplace in the early stages of design asa way of jump-starting the process andallowing many parties to brainstorm and

    participate in the design. In a charrette,architects serve as facilitators, guidingthe parties involved and translating theirideas into architectural designs.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    31/143

    31

    Educational Journey

    30 minute flight from kathmandu

    4 day hike

    mt. everest 8850m

    lukla

    phortse

    ama dablam 6856m

    neptuse

    7861m lhotse

    8414m2 month climb

    khumbi yul lha 5761m

    everst base camp

    lohste shar 8393m

    12

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    32/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    The design charrette in Phortse consistedof the architecture team from MSU, the

    teams guide, Chhongba Sherpa, andseveral community members of Phortse.Initially the team met with Chhongba anda few community members to gatherinitial ideas. Three long days were thenspent measuring and documenting thesite, creating design schemes, buildingmodels, and producing drawings anddiagrams to express those ideas. Theteam worked with materials that they hadeither brought with them to Nepal or hadacquired along their journey, includingtraditional Nepali paper and severalcardboard boxes that had to be porteredfrom Lukla to Phortse.

    Twice the community met to review thework of the team, express their thoughtson the schemes, and provide feedback.The team worked to ensure that a broadspectrum of ideas was presented to thecommunity and explained that portionsof one design scheme could easily be

    incorporated into another. Ultimately thecommunity expressed their desire for asimple building akin to their traditionalarchitecture that incorporated daylightand an advanced climbing wall.

    At the completion of the charrette all ofthe models and drawings were packed ina box created from cardboard scraps sothat they could be transported back toBozeman, Montana.

    It should be noted that this entire processwould not have been possible without thehelp and translation skills of Chhongba.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    33/143

    33

    Educational Journey

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    34/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    DESIGN STUDIO:

    FALL 2008The majority of the research and designwork in this book was created andcompiled during the Fall 2008 semesterdesign studio at MSU. For this studio fourundergraduate studentsChristopherHancock, Jaron Mickolio, DeanSoderberg, and Emily Van Courtjoinedthe team that had travelled to Nepal in August. The undergraduate students

    were quickly briefed on the project anddesign charrette, and then the studiobegan working to create several designschemes that will be presented at the2009 Khumbu Climbing School session.

    Several architectural design processeswere incorporated into this studioincluding cultural, environmental, andmaterial research and analysis, visual,volumetric, and spatial design exploration,

    and performance-driven architecturaldesign. The resulting design schemescan be found in the Design Proposalschapter of this book.

    Due to the large number of peopleassociated with this project, a criticalcomponent became presentinginformation and design work and solicitingfeedback. Presentation discussionsthroughout the semester provided the

    studio with valuable information andinsight into the project and its context.Several guest critics visiting the MSUSchool of Architecture also gavethoughtful comments and direction.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    35/143

    35

    Educational Journey

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    36/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2 Photo: C.J. Carter

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    37/143

    37

    Project Goals 38

    Site Parameters 38

    Site Description 38

    Phortse Site Plan 39

    Building Site 39

    Performance Component Map 40

    Performance architecture is an emerging design paradigm in which buildingperformance, broadly understood, becomes a guiding design principle. This newkind of architecture places performance on par with form-making; it utilizes digitaltechnologies of quantitative and qualitative performance simulation to offer acomprehensive new approach to the design of the built environment.1

    The Khumbu Climbing School design proposals are required to meet several performance

    criteria that address factors such as warmth, light, usability, constructability, andtraditional architectural forms. Focusing on performance provides a natural way ofmeasuring the potential success of each design proposal.

    Photo Opposite Page: C.J. Carter

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    38/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    39/143

    39

    Performance Architecture

    0 100 200

    lochpa lodge

    panuru lodge

    N

    lochpa lodge

    anuru lodge

    N

    building siteapprox. 5250 sq ft

    10 ft wide no-build easement

    BUILDING SITE

    The Khumbu Climbing School building:site has been donated by two villagers;Lochpa Sherpa and Panuru Sherpa.They wanted to provide an equalcontribution, so the building shouldstraddle the two sites approximatelyin half. There is some flexibility on theexact building location on the 5250 sq.ft. area.

    The site is home to a 26 juniper tree,a rare occurrence in the terraformedvillage. The tree provides the opportunityto be a focal point for the design, butalso constrains the exact location ofthe building due to its root systemand disadvantageous shadows. Sitecirculation and easements for yaksas well as view corridors of adjacent

    buildings need to be respected.

    MainEntryTrail

    MainStreetTrail

    Phortse Monastery

    Phortse School

    Ridge High Point(3,900 meters)

    UNESCOArchitype Building

    0 25 50

    PHORTSE

    SITE PLAN

    PATH

    50 TERRAIN CONTOUR

    PHORTSE BOUNDARY

    BUILDING

    SITE

    LEGEND

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    40/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    2. Gathering

    3. Living

    4. Learning

    5. Service

    a. Training Wall

    b. Climbing Wall

    1. Climbing

    B. Building Use

    a. Showers

    b. Library

    c. Potato Tubers

    a. Community

    ii. Sun Space

    a. Warmth

    iii. Trombe Wall

    i. Sidelighting

    ii. Toplighting

    b. Light

    iv. Electric Light

    i. Air Barrier

    ii. Air Circulation

    c. Air Quality

    i. Hydro

    ii. Solar

    d. Power

    iii. Wind

    iv. Batteries

    e. Water &

    C. EnvironmentalSystems

    v. Heat Exchange

    iii. Reflected Light

    iii. CrossVentilation

    Sanitation

    i. Water Retention

    ii. Water Filtration

    ii. Solar Hot Water

    iv. CompostingToilet

    i. Direct Solar Gain

    iv. ThermalInsulation

    1. Climate

    a. Sun

    b. Wind

    c. Comfort

    2. Systems

    5. Skill Capacity

    a. Stone Carving

    b. Carpentry

    c. Painting

    d. Other

    2. Monetary

    Fundraising

    4. Availability

    a. Local

    b. New

    c. Specialized

    d. Available

    3. Quality

    1. Environmental

    A. Means &Methods

    *To be done as part of spring 2009studio

    PERFORMANCE

    COMPONENTSPerformance-driven architectural designrequires that many design aspects mustbe examined thoroughly. These aspects,or components, once explored, provide aseries of options that can be strategicallycombined to produce a performance-driven design. This diagram shows thecomponents explored for this project.

    The following pages document theresearch and exploration undertaken formany of these components.

    Since our project has severalperformance-specific goals, a few ofthese component choices will takepriority over the others in the designschemes. These components havebeen highlighted in color. Please notethat components highlighted in grey will

    be examined in subsequent semesters.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    41/143

    41

    Performance Architecture

    D. Building Form

    3. Volume

    a. Offset

    b. Geode

    c. Embed

    d. Passage

    e. Inhabit

    f. Tilt

    g. Pry

    4. Space

    a. Poche

    i. Poche - 1

    ii. Poche - 2

    b. Terrace

    i. Terrace - 1

    ii. Terrace - 2

    iii. Terrace - 3

    iv. Terrace - 4

    c. Perspective

    d. Gap

    e. Light Well

    f. Material

    g. Direction

    i. Direction - 1

    ii. Direction - 2

    c. Rhythm

    b. Parallex

    a. Visual Shadow

    1. View Sheds

    3. Visual Presence

    Heritage Planes

    2. Building Form

    b. Helical Piers

    c. Gabions

    a. Rammed Earth

    d. Geogrids

    c. Cable-chordRoof Truss

    d. AluminumRafters and Joists

    b. Built-up WoodSections

    f. BundledBamboo

    4. Details

    a. Wall Openings

    b. Top | BottomWall Plates

    2. Gravity LoadSystems

    3. Lateral LoadSystems

    1. FoundationSystems

    a. Stacked Stone

    f. Interior BambooBearing Walls

    e. Cold-formedSteel Sections

    E. Material and Structural Systems

    1. Materials

    a. Wood

    iii. Plywood

    iv. Bamboo

    b. Metal

    i. Sheet Metal

    ii. Corrugated

    iii. Rebar

    iv. Steel Cable

    v. Aluminum

    c. Green Roof

    d. Mineral

    iii. Slate

    iv. Mud Veneer

    e. Synthetic

    i. Foam

    ii. UPM Profi

    iii. Vapor Barrier

    iv. Reflective Foil

    f. Transparent

    i. Glass

    ii. Fiberglass

    g. Reuse

    i. Nylon

    ii. Down Fill

    iii. Newspaper

    v. Fly Ash

    i. Rough CutTimber

    ii. DimensionalLumber

    v. Thatched Reeds

    vi. Straw Bale

    Window frame

    i. Dry Stack Stone

    ii. Stone withMortar

    v. Rammed Earth

    Insulation

    iv. Oxygen Bottles

    vi. Climbing Rope

    1. Structure

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    42/143

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    43/143

    43

    Building Use 44

    Seasonal Use Diagram 44

    Climbing Wall 46

    One of the most important performance criteria for the design is to make sure that thespaces created will fulfill the fuctions of the program laid out for the school. While theschool is not in session the building will need to perform well for community fuctions,such as banquets, ceremonial gatherings and as a meeting space.

    The photograph to the left was taken at the Sherpa Museum in Namche Bazaar.It shows a diagram of the Sherpa lifestyle throughout the year. It represents basicSherpa living and working activities as well as spiritual events.

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    44/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    Natural Resource Management

    Potato Planting

    Potato Weeding

    Potato Harvesting

    Dairy Production

    Firewood Collection

    Spinning and Weaving

    Foilage Collection

    Cattle Breeding

    Calving

    Barley and Buckwheat Sowing

    Religious

    Pilgrimages (Kathmandu and India)

    Losar (Gyalu Lhosar)

    Mani Rimdu (Thame Monastery)

    Mani Rimdu (Tengboche)

    Yanchang

    Social

    Sherpa WeddingsFunerals

    Trading with Tibet (Salt)

    Trading with Solu (Grain)

    Khumbu Climbing School

    Climbing School Instruction

    Projected KCS Instruction

    Everest ER Training

    Magic Yeti Library

    TourismMountaineering

    Trekking (High Traffic)

    Trekking (Low Traffic)

    BUILDING USE SEASONAL USEANALYSIS

    The diagram to the right examines thepotential uses of the building and thetimes of the year when these activitiescould take place.

    The program for the Khumbu ClimbingSchool incorporates many traditional andnew uses. The building will be a placewhere safe climbing practices can betaught, along with English, and medicaltraining. It is intended to also serve as acenter for community events. It will alsohold a small library, as well as a potatoseedling room to test and disperse potato

    tubers. Additionally the building willcontain living quarters for a caretaker.

    The chart to the right is a list of theprogrammatic elements that are includedin the design proposals.

    Gathering Space 1000-1200 sq ft

    Kitchen andStorage

    300 sq ft

    Equipment Roomand Storage

    300 sq ft

    Office 100 sq ft

    Living Space 200 sq ft

    Meeting Room(12 people)

    200 sq ft

    Rest rooms 100 sq ft

    Shower 100 sq ft

    TOTAL 2300-2500 sq ft

    Note: This diagram was modeled after a diagram entitled 24 Hour Distribution of Active Programmes from Unstudio Unfold by AaronBetsky, Daniel Birnbaum, Li Edelkoort, Neil Leach, Greg Lynn, and Mark Wigley (NAi Publishers 2002, 66-67).

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    45/143

    45

    Building Use

    Spring (pre-monsoon)2 3 4

    Winter

    11 12 1

    Fall (post-monsoon)8 109

    Summer (monsoon)5 6 7

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    46/143

    Interacting with Extreme Environs V2

    CLIMBING AND

    TRAINING WALLS

    PARAMETRIC CLIMBING WALL

    Precedent: Climbing Gym in KathmanduAdjustable Climbing Holds

    Climbing is a new building use for theKhumbu Region and integral to thisproject. While climbing walls are presentin Kathmandu, the Khumbu Region hasyet to see one. The Khumbu ClimbingSchool currently uses local trees andice formations around Phortse to trainthe Sherpa in safe climbing practices.Incorporating a climbing wall into the

    building design will increase the capacityof the school to teach the Sherpa andprovide them with the means of trainingduring other times of the year, as wellas have fun.

    Two climbing walls have been specifiedfor the school: a small indoor boulderingwall (referred to in this project as theclimbing wall) and a large exteriorteaching wall (training wall). The climbing

    wall will be simple in its design and willmake use of different holds to adjust thebouldering difficulty. The training wall willbe designed and built by the local Sherpastone craftsmen.

    Climbing wall gyms and safetyspecifications were researched for thisproject. The specifications were thenused to model the parameters of the twowalls in order to establish a flexible volumeof space that could be incorporated intoeach design instead of directly designingeach wall. Ultimately the climbing andtraining walls will be kept very simple intheir design and construction.

    Structure Behind Spire Climbing Wall

    Spire Climbing Center, Bozeman

    Through parametric modeling, the formalextents of the climbing wall can beextensively explored. The result is anunderstanding of the limits, function, andmechanics of the wall. This allows forgreater design sensitivity to the wall andits surrounding space.

    1

  • 8/8/2019 Interacting With Extreme Environs | volume 2 [uncropped]

    47/143

    47

    Building Use

    Y

    X>Y