Inter-Agency Workshop on

Defense-in-Depth

Mary DrouinOffice of Nuclear Regulatory Research

August 26,27, 2015

• Please check list of participants for your attendance and information is correct

• Do not need an escort to leave the conference room

• Restrooms are located– Exit left from room, go around the corner and

restrooms are on the left• In case of emergency, see next slide• Restaurants, see list in your package

2

Logistics

3

• SECY-13-0132, Enclosure 3 provided an historical review and evaluation of defense-in-depth (DID)– Was not a thorough historical review and evaluation

• Commission Staff Requirements Memorandum: “Enshrine Enclosure 3, “Defense-in-Depth Observations and Detailed History,” as an agency knowledge management tool and republish in other formats to make it more widely available”

• NUREG being developed– More complete historical review and evaluation of DID for

reactors, materials, waste, security, international and other agencies

• Holding workshop to gain perspectives from other agencies

4

Background

• Nuclear Regulatory Commission• Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Safety• Department of Energy, Office of Enterprise Assessments• National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Safety and Mission

Assurance• Department of Defense, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program• Federal Aviation Administration, National Airspace System• US Department of Interior, Bureau of Safety & Environmental

Enforcement (BSEE), Offshore Regulatory Programs• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering & Construction Division• U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Infrastructure Information

Collection Division National Protection & Programs Directorate• Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

5

Participants

• To exchange information regarding how defense-in-depth is viewed by various agencies

• More specifically, looking to gain insights on perspectives from other agencies on the following:– The need, objective, definition and scope for DID– Implementation approaches and challenges to DID– Sufficiency or adequacy for DID– Relationship of risk analysis to DID

6

Purpose of Workshop

• There will be workshop proceedings developed• Each participant will have the opportunity to

review and comment/approve the proceedings• Proceedings will be attached to the NUREG report

being developed which will be a public document• Workshop is being recorded

– there will not be a transcript – the recording is only to assist in assuring the

information provided in the proceeding will be correctly represented

7

Results of Workshop

8:30 am to 9:00 am Opening remarks and introduction9:00 am to 10:00 am NRC presentation10:00 am to 10:30 am Canadian presentation10:30 am to 10:45 am BREAK10:45 am to 11:45 pm NASA presentation11:45 pm to 12:15 pm Naval Nuclear Propulsion12:15 pm to 1:30 pm LUNCH1:30 pm to 2:30 pm FAA presentation2:30 pm to 3:00 pm BSEE presentation3:00 pm to 3:15 pm BREAK3:15 pm to 3:45 pm Homeland Security presentation3:45 pm to 4:30 pm DOE Safety/Security presentation4:30 pm to 5:00 pm Army Corps of Engineers5:00 pm to 5:15 pm First Day Wrap-up

5:15 pm to 6:00 pm NRC team to summarize insights

⇒ Presenters can use entire time for their presentations8

Agenda (Day 1)

8:30 am to 9:30 am Insights from Day 19:30 am to 10:30 am Need, Objective, Definition and

Scope of DID10:30 am to 10:45 am BREAK10:45 am to 12:00 pm DID Implementation Approaches

and Challenges12:00 pm to 1:15 pm LUNCH1:15 pm to 2:30 pm DID Sufficiency and Adequacy2:30 pm to 2:45 pm BREAK2:45 pm to 3:45 pm Relationship of Risk Analysis to DID3:45 pm to 4:30 pm Wrap-up of Workshop Discussions

9

Agenda (Day 2)

• September 11, 2015: Draft proceedings complete and NRC sends to participants for review and comment

• September 25, 2015: Participants send in comments to NCR

• October 2, 2015: NRC addresses participants’ comments and sends out final proceedings to participants for their information

• October 9, 2015: Participants provide any outstanding concerns on proceedings

• December 30, 2015: Final draft of NUREG complete, ready for publication (proceedings in NUREG as an appendix)

10

Schedule