Upload
reegan
View
29
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Intel Cafeteria and Construction Waste Management. Ashley Maiorano Chemical Engineering Kaitlin McGillvray Civil Engineering Elise Nakamura Biotechnology. July 4, 2005. Agenda. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
IntelCafeteria and Construction Waste
Management
Ashley MaioranoChemical Engineering
Kaitlin McGillvrayCivil Engineering
Elise NakamuraBiotechnology
July 4, 2005
2
Agenda
The purpose of this presentation is to make formal recommendations in Intel’s cafeteria and construction waste management
Goal Cafeteria Waste
– Data Analysis and Results– Recommendations
Construction Waste– Data Analysis and Results– Recommendations
Recycling Market
3
Benefits
Reduces waste sent to the landfill
Increases recycling rate
Saves money
Preserves the environment
4
Problem Statement
Intel Costa Rica is currently recycling 72 percent of waste.
The company wants to improve the recycling rate by focusing on cafeteria and construction waste.
5
Goal
To assist Intel by giving a proposal to reduce the volume of waste that Intel sends to landfill focusing on cafeteria and construction waste.
6
Methodology Part 1
Perform cafeteria waste analysis
Conduct composting experiment
Research composting systems
7
464 lbs of food waste
+
147 lbs of yard waste
+
1000 lbs of sludge waste
1611 lbs of waste produced (per day)
Waste Analysis
8
In the Cafeteria
Trashcans located in inconvenient places
Waste is not being segregated
9
Recommendation for Cafeteria
Use segregated trashcans
Put in convenient locations
10
In the Kitchen
Waste is not being segregated All waste is sent to landfills
11
Recommendation for Kitchen
Segregate Organic from Inorganic Waste
Place containers in convenient locations
12
Composting Experiment
To investigate composting using Intel’s waste and determine any problems that arise
Ratios in Parts by Volume
Sludge Food Yard
Bucket 1 6 0 0
Bucket 2 2 2 2
Bucket 3 1 1 4
Bucket 4 0 3 3
Bucket 5 1 3 2
13
Results of Experiment
Complications with Open Systems
Rate of Composting
14
Earth Tub
Composts 40-200 lbs of waste per day
Composting takes 3-4 weeks and 20-40 days to cure
8 tubs needed Cost: $8,495 per tub
15
Windrow System
Open System
Inexpensive
Concerns– Odor– Pests– Irrigation Needed– Labor-Intensive Image from google.com
16
Waste Production and Cost
Jan Feb March April
CR1 9,800 6,800 10,000 28,000
CR2 8,400 20,200 21,600 12,600
CR3 0 0 0 0
Cafeteria 22,800 21,000 23,400 26,400
Contractor 0 0 0 0
Total weight (lbs) 41,000 48,000 55,000 67,000
Total Cost (dollars)
246 288 326.40 402
17
Waste Reduction and Cost
Reduce Cafeteria Waste by 60 percent– Includes vegetable waste (50% of total cafeteria
waste) and leftover waste from meals (10% of total cafeteria waste)
– Save 92 tons/year from being sent to the landfill
Savings of $1,107 (per year) on disposal weight alone
18
Cost For Disposal in the Month of May
Service Cost ($) Quantity Total Cost
Rental Fee for Compactor
257 1 257
Trips to the compactor
48 8 384
Total Cost (month)
$641
The annual cost is 641 x 12 = $7,692
19
Reduction of Trips Made for Garbage Collection Costs
Cost Quantity Total Cost
Rental fee for Compactor
257 1 257
Trips to the compactor
48 4 192
Total Cost (month)
$449
Total Annual Cost with Reduction: $5,388
Savings per Year: 7,692 – 5,388 = $2,304
20
Total Savings in the Cafeteria
Weight of Disposal: $1,107
Cost of Transportation: $2,304
Total Saved on Disposal Fees: $3,411
21
Methodology Part 2
Agencies and companies researched
Determine Intel’s construction waste management practices
Create industry “best practices” model
Make recommendations based on model
22
Agencies and Companies
Consigli Construction of Massachusetts Simons Construction of the United Kingdom The Australian Government Department of the
Environment and Heritage Welsh School of Architecture Washington State Department of General
Administration Public Works and Public Services Canada Encluster Environmental Enterprise
23
Consigli Construction
2004 EPA WasteWise Award 2004 Environmental Merit Award 2004 Building Design & Construction Award 2004 Mass Preservation Awards OSHA Blue Safety Partnership Clark Distribution Center
– 65,000 square foot addition– 60,000 square foot renovation– Savings in disposal fees: $49,000
24
Simons Construction
Winner of the Green Apple Award,
2001-2004
Winner of the Linconshire Environmental Award, 2001 & 2003
25
Co-Mingled vs. Source Segregated Recycling
Co-Mingled– 15-93 percent recycling rate– Labor intensive– Space efficient
Source Segregated– 90+ percent recycling rate– Cost efficient
26
Waste Management Hierarchy
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle
Compost
Incinerate
Landfill
Source: Consigli Construction
27
Prior to Construction
Design to prevent waste – Example: design using standard size building
materials Establish the project specific waste
management plan– Identify waste– Identify disposal facilities
Assign role for someone to be responsible to implement waste management plan
28
Material Purchasing
Use tight estimatingAccurate Quantities + Over Order= Building+ Waste
Choose materials with minimal to no packaging
Ask for supplier coordination– Buy back– Take back– Returnable Pallets– Delivery Schedule
29
Site Arrangements
Identify sources of waste Place dumpsters
strategically – Size– Type– Location
Color code containers depending on the material disposed in them
Place segregated containers behind mixed containers
Empty containers regularly
30
Waste Checks
Recycling and Waste Management Record
DeliveryDate
BinSize
WasteType
Pick UpDate
TotalTonnageTakenAway
%Recycled
Comments
Track monthly Analyze cumulatively
31
Material Efficiency Indicator
Establish waste checks Analyze data Compare to other projects
– Average new construction yields 3.9 lbs of waste per square foot (Consigli Construction)
Use as a guideline for future projects
32
Servicios Ecológicos
Company that manages recycled materials for Intel
Created a program to employ single mothers and their families
Sends some materials to the United States and Central America to be recycled
33
What Problems Do They Face?
Minimal Market
Minimal Technology
Space Constraints
34
Researching a Regional Recycling Market
Contacted CNP+L for a regional recycling market– There are minimal recycling markets in Central America
Mercado de Residuos y Subproductos Industriales (MERSI)
– Provides information to companies on handling industrial residues and subproducts
– Provides information on recycling and reducing– Aids companies in selling materials to other companies
35
Researching a Recycling Market in the United States
Researched recycling companies in the United States to provide a market for Costa Rica– RecyclingMarket.Net
Compiled a spreadsheet with companies, what they are able to recycle, and their contact information
36
Benefits of an Expanded Recycling Market
More materials can be recycled
There will be contact with the United States to learn about new technology
Servicios Ecológicos can expand their company and provide more jobs for the community
37
Make recycling program mandatory for all employees
Make recycling program mandatory for all subcontracted employees
Include a section on segregation
Educating Employees
38
Acknowledgements
Anibal Alterno Mario Barquero Francisco Cespedes Shane Cheatham Luis Chinchilla Erika Diaz Marco Esquival
Christian Garbanzo Arthur Gerstenfeld Randy Helgeson Pedro Zolano Susan Vernon-
Gerstenfeld Doctor Verde Staff
39
Questions???