Integrating Indigenous Resource Management

with Wildlife Conservation

A Case Study of Batang Ai National Park

Themes today Research questions Methods Batang Ai National Park and the Iban community Iban methods of resource management

Farmland ownership and rules of access Forest areas conserved

Socioeconomic changes Economic development State legislation

Co-management New rules Reinforcing local authority A sense of ownership

Conclusions: Lessons from Batang Ai

Research questions Horowitz, L.S. 1998. Integrating indigenous resource

management with wildlife conservation: a case study of Batang Ai National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia. Human Ecology 26(3): 371-403.

To what extent do long-standing, community-based methods of resource management still provide for the conservation of wildlife and natural resources under today’s circumstances?

How can components of these systems be reinforced by state policy as part of an integrated conservation plan?

Methods Semi-structured interviews Participant observation List of topics

local beliefs and regulations rules of access use rights enforcement ownership sense of collaboration

Interviews with government officials Documents

Batang Ai National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia

Batang Ai National Park and its longhouses

Iban methods of resource management

Pioneer shifting cultivation Primary forest has shrunk due

to: local population growth loss of legal rights logging concessions

Adat responsibility of longhouse leader flexible

Farmland ownership and rules of access Longhouse territories Reserved for

community Land rights

belong to descendants of person who cleared

but not exclusive, permanent, or of sale

Rights to former longhouse sites

Forest areas conserved Pulau

no farming or burning reserves of animals, trees, and plants only for longhouse indirectly conserve forest and wildlife

Pulau pesaka sacred owned by individual household + descendants no farming or burning no tree cutting no selling

Other sacred areas burial sites communal cemeteries

Fishing regulations Not allowed

plant poison commercially-

bought poison electric generators

Flexible rules

Protected species Trees

strangler fig along the river bank medicinal taboo

Omen birds’ breeding grounds no farming no cutting trees

Tua

Economic development Urban migration Religious

conversion Technology Commercialization

State legislation Privatization

title smallholdings In this house, we still share farmland, exchanging, like

that. We don’t want to get titles. If we had titles, we wouldn’t be able to farm each other’s land. If people wanted to farm, they would have to pay money. We don’t want that, not yet. Because we still have plenty of available land. (Abong anak Bansa, pers. com. 1996)

State control Sarawak Land Code 1958: uncleared land to the state can be reclaimed

Co-management Working with customary

authorities Retaining rights New rules

no cutting primary forest protected species no selling forest products rights only for residents

Reinforcing local authority Locals track illegal

hunters Wildlife ranger

course arrest trespassers inform officials

A sense of ownership? Co-ownership

But the government, it saw that we have many animals, many things that outsiders shouldn’t take. The government helps us. We both own [the land]. The government owns, and we own. It helps us, like that. So, the reason is, the government co-owns it so that people can’t disturb [the area] (Kasi anak Sanggon, pers. com. 1996).

Mistrust We are perplexed in this situation; the government won’t buy

any [land]. So, it was said in the past, we can take wood here, we can take timber.... Recently, people said we can. In the future, where won’t it be allowed? Where will be the national park, what will we be permitted to disturb? Laws from the state, the whole state of Sarawak. But the government, it’s a way for the government to trick us, deceive us Iban, because we Iban don’t know, they say (Abong anak Bansa, pers. com. 1996).

Conclusions: Lessons from Batang Ai Changing socioeconomic conditions – CPRM is

not enough Customary regulations

a base for other management more respect

Long-term use is necessary Batang Ai National Park

recognition of rights long-term security mistrust develop a sense of cooperation