Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Integrating geochemical tracers with
physics-based modeling to understand
Rio Icacos storm response
Funding from
NSF Hydrology
Program and CZEN
Andy Kurtz Boston University
Festo Lugolobi
Guido Salvucci
326 ha monolithogic
catchment
50 Ma quartz diorite
4200mm annual rainfall
22°C mean annual temp
Critical Zone Exploration Network
Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Budgets
Rio Icacos Study AreaResearch Approach:
-Understand tracer behavior
in soils, porewaters
-Link tracer to stream chemistry,
infer solute sources and flowpaths
-Test inferences against simulations
(physics-based hydrology model)
Geochemical and Isotopic Tracers of Solutes
Ge substitutes for Si in
minerals, behaves like Si
in solution
Silicon tracer:
Ge/Si ratios in water
reflect fractionation by
weathering and
biological cycling
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040
Ge
/Si (
µm
ol/
mo
l)
1/Si
Streamwater
Bedrock Springs
Overland flow
Surface ponding
Streamwater Ge/Si ratios reflect mixing
Streamwater Ge/Si ratios reflect mixing
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040
Ge
/Si (
µm
ol/
mo
l)
1/Si
Streamwater
Bedrock Springs
Overland flow
Surface ponding
Streamwater falling
Streamwater Ge/Si ratios reflect mixing
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040
Ge
/Si (
µm
ol/
mo
l)
1/Si
Streamwater
Bedrock Springs
Overland flow
Surface ponding
Streamwater falling
Soil water
Example Event: 6-24-2006 StormPrecip. = 3.3 cm in~2 hours
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
100
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00
Pre
cip
(cm
/hr)
Dis
char
ge (
m3
/se
c)
Time
Example Event: 6-24-2006 Storm
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ge
/Si (
µm
ol/
mo
l)
Discharge (m3/sec)
Example Event: 6-24-2006 Storm
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00
frac
tio
n
Time
Error bars reflect propagation of analytical and endmember uncertainty
Rising
Three component mixing
“surface water”
“ground water”
“soil matrix water”
Physics-based 3-D integrated
subsurface-surface hydrologic model
-Surface
-Porous Media
-Macropore
FLOW and TRANSPORT
Hydrologic Model InHM VanderKwaak and Loague
Parameterized with
hydrometric and physical
data from site
(soil characteristic tables,
hydraulic conductivity,
porosity)
Finite element grid from DEM
Soil, saprolite, bedrock layers
(days)
(m3/s
ec)
Model Performance: July-August 2007
“flashiness” requires dominance of overland flow
TDR data:
hillslope
site
Model
simulation:
hillslope
site
(sec)
(sec)
Model Performance: July-August 2007
Synthetic hydrograph separationModel Tracers6-24-2006 Storm
June Event: Surface flow velocity (m/s) at max Q
June Event: Surface “Event” tracer at max Q
June Event: Porous Media “Pre-Event” tracer at max Q
ConclusionsGeochemistry
• Streamwater Ge/Si data indicate three components to stormflow
• Shallow/overland flow component dominates most of hydrograph
• A soil matrix component becomes significant at the end of hydrograph recession
Model
• Model indicates catchment “flashiness” controlled by (Hortonian) overland flow rather than macropores
• Application of model tracers indicate dominance of “event water” delivered by overland flow early in event, and displaced “pre-event water” during hydrograph recession.
Model serves as a useful test of geochemical inferences, some consistency, but may be failing to capture some important processes.
Oxygen Isotopes - trace ‘new’ vs. ‘old’ water
Rain (6-24-06 event) = -3.3
Baseflow = -2.7
Falling LimbRising Limb
Isotope Hydrograph Separation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (hours)
% C
on
trib
uti
on
Event water
Pre-event waterFalling Limb
Solute
sources
from a soil
perspectiv
e
Geochemical and Isotopic Tracers of Solutes
Both of these tracers have paleoceanographic applications as well
Geochemical and Isotopic Tracers of Solutes
87Sr/86Sr ratios reflect
age and Rb/Sr ratio of
rocks and minerals
Cation tracer:
Sr isotope ratios in water
reflect source of cations
(mineral weathering, ion
exchange, weathering)
Ge/Si Geochemistry "pseudo-isotopic" behavior
Ge
C
Sn
Pb
Si
6
14
32
50
82
Group
IVB
W.W. Norton
Ge substitutes for Si in the silicate lattice
(Goldschmidt's “camouflage”)
1 to 5 atoms of
Ge per million
silicon atoms
Ge/Si Geochemistry "pseudo-isotopic" behavior
Ge follows Si through marine & terrestrial cycling
pH
Model of Ge/Si fractionation during
incongruent silicate weathering
. .
0
1
2
3
4
Unweathered
Rock (~1.4)
Secondary
Clays (~3.5)
Solute
(~0.35)
Incongruent
Weathering
of Primary
Silicates
(low-intensity)
Congruent
Dissolution of
Secondary Clays
(high intensity)
Streamwater
Ge/Si Results
from
Two-Component
MixingG e / S i x 1 0
- 6
Solute
(~3.5)
Str
eam
s
after Murnane and Stallard, 1990; Froelich et al., 1992
Ge/Si fractionation in synthetic allophane
Ge/Si = 1.0µmol/mol
NeoformedallophaneGe/Si = 1.3µmol/mol
52 ppm Si,55 ppm Al
24 ppm Si,1.6 ppm Al
Ge/Si = 0.5µmol/mol
5 days @ 90°C
NaOH titration,
Soil solids
Perspective
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 2 4 6 8
CaO (wt%)
de
pth
(cm
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
5 10 15 20 25
Al2O3 (wt%)
de
pth
(cm
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
60 65 70 75 80 85
SiO2 (wt%)
de
pth
(cm
)
Luquillo Ridgetop Saprolite Core Profiles
Weathering profiles aren’t like sediment cores…
Conveyor belt goes UP
(landscape eroding 25-50 m/my)
Losing Plagioclase
Losing Kaolinite
Hillslope Soil Profile
40 cm
PR Field photos90 cm
On Ridgetops, this
saprolite-bedrock
contact is at 800cm
depth
Solid-phase Ge/Si ratios (µmol/mol)
Regolith Minerals
Kaolinite = 5.9
Altered Biotite = 5.3
Quartz = 0.5
Primary Minerals
Hornblende = 6.6
Biotite = 5.5
Plagioclase = 1.5
Quartz = 0.5
Soil
= 2.5
Saprolite
= 2.8 to 3.3
Quartz
Diorite
= 2.0
Opal Phytoliths: 0.1 to 0.5
“Immobile Element” Mass Balance Framework
j,w Cj,w
Cj, pCi, p
Ci,w
1
Fractional net loss (or gain) of a mobile element j (e.g. Si)
calculated relative to immobile element i (Nb, Zr)
Positive tau = gain of mobile element
Negative tau = loss of mobile element
Solid-phase Ge/Si ratios (µmol/mol)
Soil
= 2.5
Saprolite
= 2.8 to 3.3
Quartz
Diorite
= 2.0
Weathering Ge/Si Fractionations
Plagioclase ----> Kaolinite
60% of Si
40% of Si Ge/Sisoln
= 0.4
Biotite ----> Kaolinite and
Kaolinite ----> Solution
33% of(remaining) Si
Ge/Sisoln
= 3.7
Si=-0.4
Si=-0.6
Soil Water
Perspective
Ceramic-cup
pressure-
vacuum
water
samplers
(lysimeters)
Ridgetop Site (LG-1)
Nested Lysimeters
in deep saprolite
15cm to >800cm
Rio Icacos Study Area
Soil and Saprolite Porewaters Ridgetop Site LG-1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 100 200
Si (µmol/L)
dep
th(cm
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 1 2 3 4 5
Ge/Si (µmol/mol)
(WEBB project suction lysimeters)
Predictions
Ge/Sisoln= 0.4
Ge/Sisoln= 3.7
Not Seeing 0.4 here…
“Landslide Water”
Si = 340 µmol/L
Ge/Si = 0.3 µmol/mol
Stream
Perspective
Rio Icacos at Flood
Stage, Nov „06
USGS
Stream
Gauge
ISCO STREAM
SAMPLER
Silica
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 50 100 150 200 250
Discharge (ft3/sec)
Si (µ
mo
l/L
)
BaseflowRising LimbFalling Limb
Baseflow
Ge/Si & [Si] chemical hydrograph separation
fg Rt Rs
Rg Rs
2) Use Ge/Si (“R”) to partition Si flux into
“groundwater” and soilwater components
3) Multiply Si fluxes by endmember Si concentrations to
determine water flux of components
1) Define “groundwater” and “soilwater” endmembers (Si
concentration and Ge/Si) based on data
4) Close water balance by adding “Si free water”
Hydrograph Separation Based on Ge/Si and [Si]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (hours)
% C
on
trib
uti
on
Soil water
Si-free water
Groundwater
Falling LimbRising
Hydrograph Separations Based on Ge/Si and [Si]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (hours)
% C
on
trib
uti
on
Soil water
Si-free water
Groundwater
Falling Limb
Flowpath Control over Solutes
"Storm Flow" Conditions: Subsurface
stormflow dominates: Soils contribute to
solute load
Dilute solutions with high Ge/Si (& 87Sr/86Sr)
Carried by “New Water”
"Base Flow" Conditions: Groundwater
discharge maintains streamflow. Solute load
reflects incongruent weathering of primary
silicates
Concentrated solutions with low Ge/Si, (& 87Sr/86Sr)
Carried by “Old Water”
Physics-based 3-D
integrated subsurface-
surface hydrologic model
InHMVanderKwaak and Loague
Hydrologic Model
Porosity
Physics-based 3-D
integrated subsurface-
surface hydrologic model
InHMVanderKwaak and Loague
Hydrologic Model
Total Hydraulic Head
Physics-based 3-D
integrated subsurface-
surface hydrologic model
InHMVanderKwaak and Loague
Hydrologic Model
Saturation
Physics-based 3-D
integrated subsurface-
surface hydrologic model
InHMVanderKwaak and Loague
Hydrologic Model
Porous media flow velocity (m/s)
Physics-based 3-D
integrated subsurface-
surface hydrologic model
InHMVanderKwaak and Loague
Hydrologic Model
Model Slice - Flow Velocity
Physics-based 3-D
integrated subsurface-
surface hydrologic model
InHMVanderKwaak and Loague
Hydrologic Model
Model Slice - Flow Velocity
Hydrologic Model
Synthetic storm hydrograph
Hydraulic Conductivity determined by Guelph Permeameter
Stormflow zone?