INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENTDecision Maker Workshop

New Orleans, August, 2005

Agenda

1. Integrated Risk Management Overview2. Risk/Capability/Gap Formula & IRM Process 3. Risks4. Capabilities5. Gaps6. Discussion

Integrated Risk Management (IRM)

• Taking a risk-based approach, assessing our capabilities, and identifying our gaps, is instrumental in our ability to shape the emergency management and homeland security strategic planning and policy-making process.

• Integrated Risk Management is a process to fuse, unify, and inform the Homeland Security Enterprise.

• You are all a strategic part of the Homeland Security Enterprise.

4

Fire

Non-Profits EMA NGOs

LE

Federal

HealthDecisionMakers

PrivateSectorCEOs

State

Citizens

“Silo-ed” Approach

Integrated Approach

Fire

EMA

LE

PrivateSectorCEOs

Citizens

Health

DecisionMakers

State

FederalLocalJurisdictions

State andFederal Partners

NGOsNon-Profits

EmergencyPartners

Homeland Security Enterprise

• Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) is a “whole community” approach.

• Utilizes partnerships among emergency management, law enforcement, public health, local/state/federal government, private sector, nongovernmental organizations, faith-based & community-based organizations, and the public.

• Federal guidance focus is on all-hazards preparedness; local HSE partners must share info regardless of threat or hazard, man-made or natural.

• Foundation of IRM is understanding the Risk Capabilities Gaps Decision-Making process .

EMA

Communication & Coordination• Participation by Decision Makers in the

Homeland Security Enterprise is key to fully realizing integrated risk management.

Decision Maker Education and Engagement

Homeland Security Enterprise

8

Risk/Capability/GapFormula

Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Threat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA)

Core Capability Assessment Gap Analysis

CapabilitiesRisk Results

Decision Maker Review & Updates

GapsCapabilitiesRisk RecommendedActions

Resource Allocation,Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Gaps

Integrated Risk Management Components

10

Risk Process

• Develop likely, worse-case scenarios

• Identify risk factors

• Weight risk factors

• Score risks

• Update Risk Assessment based on new methodology and scoring risks

Risk Results

12

Capability Process

• Identify priority Core Capabilities based on scenarios

• Develop Capability Assessment Survey based on the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA)

• Assess Capability current levels with preparedness goals

• Identify priority Capabilities based on survey results

13

Capability Assessment Results

Core CapabilitiesPriority Sequence

14

Gap Process

• Use Capability Assessment to identify Gaps

• Prioritize to ensure the higher priority Gaps are accurately identified

• Identify Solution Areas to determine ways to close the Gaps

• Finalize with written Gap Analysis

15

Gap Analysis Results/Recommended Actions

Planning

Organization

Equipment

Training

Exercises

Decision Maker Education and Engagement

Homeland Security Enterprise

16

Process Review

Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Franklin CountyThreat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA)

Franklin County Core Capability Assessment

Franklin County Gap Analysis

CapabilitiesRisk Results

Decision Maker Review & Updates

GapsCapabilitiesRisk RecommendedActions

Resource Allocation,Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Gaps

Nashville, May, 2010

QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION