26
Southern California Water Dialogue February 24, 2021

Integrated Resources Plan

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Integrated Resources Plan

2020 INTEGRATED RESOURCES PLAN

Southern California Water DialogueFebruary 24, 2021

Page 2: Integrated Resources Plan

Presentation Overview

Integrated Resources Plan

History of the IRP Scenario Planning IRP Progress & Schedule

Page 3: Integrated Resources Plan

Integrated Resources Plan (IRP)

• Blueprint for Southern California water reliability• Long-term strategy adapting to changing conditions• Diversified resource portfolio

Imported Water

Transfers/ Exchanges

StorageGround Water

Recovery

Recycling

Conservation

Page 4: Integrated Resources Plan

1996 2004 2010 2015

History of the IRP1987 – 1992

DroughtColorado River

CutbacksSWP

Restrictions Recession & Drought

Page 5: Integrated Resources Plan

Potable Water Demand Stable Despite Growth

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Mill

ion

Acr

e-Fe

et/M

illio

n Pe

ople

Calendar Year

Metropolitan Service Area Population

Potable Consumptive Water Demand

Page 6: Integrated Resources Plan

The Future Is Not Predictable

?

FUTURETODAY

Page 7: Integrated Resources Plan

Scenario Planning Approach To Examine A Range of Plausible Futures

FUTURETODAY

Page 8: Integrated Resources Plan

2020 IRP Roadmap

Identify Drivers of Change

Construct Learning Scenarios

Develop Resource Mix

Adaptive Management Strategy

Page 9: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of ChangeIdentify Drivers of Change

Page 10: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of ChangeIdentify Drivers of Change

Climate Change

Politics and Regulations

Technological Advances

Economy and Demographics

• Sea level rise• Rainfall• Rising temperatures• Recession or economic upturn• Public’s willingness to pay• Population growth• New technologies• Stormwater expansion• Emerging contaminants• Delta issues

Page 11: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 12: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 13: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 14: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 15: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 16: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 2: Construct Scenarios & Refine AnalysisCreated a supply – demand framework

Less Imported Supply Stability

Lower Demand on Metropolitan

Higher Demand on Metropolitan

Low Demand

Stable Imports

High DemandStable Imports

High DemandReduced Imports

A B

Low Demand Reduced ImportsC D

Greater Imported Supply Stability

Page 17: Integrated Resources Plan

High DemandReduced Imports D

Step 2: Construct Scenarios & Refine AnalysisWorking assumptions for each Scenario

Low Demand

Stable Imports

A High DemandStable Imports

B

Low Demand Reduced ImportsC

• Slower growing economy

• Least additional supply needed

• Fewest local supply projects included

• Gradual climate impacts/fewer regulatory requirements

• Faster growing economy

• Additional supply needed for growing demands

• Additional local supply projects

• Gradual climate impacts/fewer regulatory requirements

• Slower growing economy

• Additional supply needed for loss of imported supply

• Additional local supply projects; prioritize projects with least investment needed

• Severe climate impacts/higher regulatory requirements

• Faster growing economy

• Most additional supply needed for growing demands and loss of imported supply

• Most local supply projects included

• Severe climate impacts/higher regulatory requirements

Page 18: Integrated Resources Plan

Low Demand

Stable Imports

A High DemandStable Imports

B Low Demand Reduced ImportsC

High DemandReduced Imports D

Common Actions: Form the Basis for the 2020 IRP

Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions

Step 3: Develop A Resource MixIdentify Actions and Targets to Achieve Reliability

Page 19: Integrated Resources Plan

Low Demand

Stable Imports

A High DemandStable Imports

B Low Demand Reduced ImportsC

High DemandReduced Imports D

Unique Actions: Basis for the Adaptive Management Plan

Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions

Step 4: Adaptive Management StrategyIdentify Signposts to Inform Policy Decision Makers

Page 20: Integrated Resources Plan

IRP Plan through April

Member Agencyinput

Consultation with Experts

Modeling for Gap Analysis

Refine Scenario Assumptions and Gap Analysis

Board Policy Discussions

Research and Confirmation

Page 21: Integrated Resources Plan

Scenario Assumption Refinements

Demands Imported Supply Local Supply

• Colorado River• State Water Project

• Groundwater• Recycled Water• Seawater Desalination• Surface Water• Los Angeles Aqueduct

Key Areas

Page 22: Integrated Resources Plan

Demand Refinements

• Member Agency Feedback• Feedback received through various forums

• Qualitative/Quantitative Assessment• Workshops and other meetings

• Engage with Demand Experts• Share feedback and pose questions to experts• Receive preliminary assessment of scenarios and input on issues raised

• Workshop with Board, Member Agencies, and Experts• Opportunity to review expert input and ask questions in March 2021

Page 23: Integrated Resources Plan

Imported Water Supply Refinements

• Member Agency Feedback• Feedback received through various forums

• Qualitative/Quantitative Assessment• Workshops and other meetings

• Engage with Climate Experts• Share feedback and pose questions to experts• Receive preliminary assessment of scenarios and input on issues raised

• Workshop with Board, Member Agencies, and Experts• Opportunity to review expert input and ask questions in April 2021

Page 24: Integrated Resources Plan

Local Supply Refinements

• Engage member agencies about local supplies through 4 separate yet concurrent tracks

• Engage with Climate Experts

Local Supplies

Groundwater Surface Water Los Angeles Aqueduct Local Projects

Page 25: Integrated Resources Plan

Tentative Schedule

STEP 2Refine

Scenarios

Jan - Apr 2021

STEP 3Develop

Resource Mix

Mar-Jun2021

STEP 4Adaptive

Management

May- Aug 2021

Adopt IRP Report

Sep 2021

Page 26: Integrated Resources Plan