INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME

20.04.2023 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 2

Integrated operational programme

⋐ Thematic operational program in programming period 2007-2013

⋐ The managing authority of the IOP is the Ministry for Regional Development

Main targets:⋐ Modernisation of public administration ⋐ Increasing the quality and availability of

public services⋐ Support of territorial development


Priority axis/Intervention area

Name of IA/PA Intermediate body

PA 1 Modernisation of the public administration

Ministry of Interior

PA 2 Introducing ICT in the territorial public administration

Ministry of InteriorCentre for Regional Development

IA 3.1 Social integration services Ministry of Labour and Social AffairsCentre for Regional Development

IA 3.2 Public health services Ministry of Health

IA 3.3 Employment services Ministry of Labour and Social AffairsCentre for Regional Development

IA 3.4 Services in security, risk prevention and management

Ministry of InteriorCentre for Regional Development

Intermediate bodies of IOP I.


Priority axis/Intervention area

Name of IA/PA Intermediate body

PA 4 National support of tourism Centre for Regional Development

IA 5.1 National support of exploitation of cultural heritage

Ministry of Culture

IA 5.2 Improving the environment in problematic housing estates

Centre for Regional Development

IA 5.3 Modernisation and development of system for creating territorial policies

Centre for Regional Development

Intermediate bodies of IOP II.


Priority axes Name of priority axes Allocation (SF)

PA 1a Modernisation of the public administration 310,6 mil. €

PA 1b Modernisation of the public administration 23,89 mil. €

PA 2 Introducing ICT in the territorial publicadministration

170,83 mil. €

PA 3 Increase of quality and availability of publicservices

545,1 mil. €

PA 4a National support of tourism 60,56 mil. €

PA 4b National support of tourism 4,65 mil. €

PA 5 National support of the territorial development

420,86 mil. €

PA 6a Technical assistance 45,03 mil. €

PA 6b Technical assistance 0,82 mil. €

PAs 1-6 Summary 1 582 mil. €

Priority axes and allocation of IOP


Provider of grant % of IOP Allocation (SF+SB)

Ministry of Interior 42,74 795,5 mil. €

Ministry of Health 15,70 292,3 mil. €

Ministry of Culture 13,45 250,3 mil. €

Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs

7,95 148,0 mil. €

Ministry for Regional Development

20,17 375,5 mil. €

Summary 100 % 1 861,6 mil. €

Provider of grant and allocation of IOP

7

Benefits/disadvantages of IOPs structure

Benefits⋐ Concentration of

themes into 1 programme ⋐ Otherwise into 5 or 6

OPs⋐ Lower expenditures for

administration capacity⋐ Linked topics (e.g.

Intervention areas 5.2c) + 3.1b)

⋐ Well experienced managing authority⋐ MA of JROP and SPD

Disadvantages⋐ Multi-targeting of some

priority axes = Gift of the Danaans

⋐ 5 intermediate bodies⋐ Only one IB had previous

experience with implementation of structural funds

⋐ Payments through several IBs

8

IUDP Integrated urban development plans

⋐ Intervention area 5.2 Improving the environment in problematic housing estates

⋐Global objective: Enhancing of the quality of life and environment for inhabitans of problematic housing estates

⋐Coherent area with at least 500 flats in towns over 20 000 inhabitants

⋐Criteria of a deprivated zone follow Article No 47 of Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006


Supported activities

a) Revitalisation of public areas

b) Regeneration of apartment houses

c) Pilot projects focused on solving problems of Roma communities


Financial allocation⋐EUR 192 million is allocated for the

intervention area 5.2 from the ERDF

Towns by number of inhabitants

Number of town with approved

IUDP

Average financial limit

per one selected zone

Over 50 000 17 Cca 11 mil. €

21 000-50 000 24 Cca 7,3 mil. €


Process of implemention of IUDP

A town choses and approves projects (in compliance with IUDP)

CRD controls admissibility and formal

properties of proposals

Applicants propose projects to the municipal authority

A town calls for project proposals

MA issues a decision on provision of a grant

CRDcontrols realisation

of a payment application

20.04.2023 12

Case study – Brno I.

⋐ IOP intervention area 5.2c)

⋐ 7 projects for regeneration buildings

⋐ Allocation - 57 728 925 CZK

⋐ Implementation period: 2010-2011

⋐ Activities: complete reconstruction of buildings, measures for energy savings, construction of social apartments


Case study – Brno II.⋐IOP intervention areas5.2c) + 3.1b)

⋐Childcare/Education centre with social programmes for family with children

⋐Implementation: 2011-2012

Thank you for your attention

Lumíra KafkováIOP Managing Authority

[email protected]

Documents

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME