Upload
lorena-porter
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Integrated Design and Delivery Systems
By Dr Zeeshan Aziz – licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
ORBEE Learning Material
Introduction to Integrated Design and Delivery Systems
Lesson 1- The Need for Integrated Design and Delivery Systems
Lesson Plan
• Overview of the Construction Industry• Management organisation within construction• Review of existing construction project
delivery routes.
Key Learning Outcomes
• To demonstrate an understanding of the business need for Integrated Project Design and Delivery Systems
• To understand management organisational structure within Construction
• To demonstrate awareness of key construction project delivery routes
• To understand key principles of Integrated Project Delivery
The UK construction industry
• It accounts for over 8% of GDP• Consists of over 300,000 firms employing over 2
million people • One in 10 people rely on the construction
industry for employment• Contractors employ 1.68 million people in
UK(2005)• Under pressure to become more sustainable
and productive
Reasons for Declining Construction Productivity
• Heavily regulated• Fragmented nature of
the industry • Traditional adversarial
culture• Low investments in R&D• Slow to adopt new
technology
Problems associated with Document Centric Communication Model
• Information redundancy• Communication errors
and loss of project information
• Errors and omissions in paper documents
• Inadequacy of traditional project workflows
Concurrent Engineering Defined
• “Concurrent engineering methodologies permit the separate tasks of the product development process to be carried out simultaneously rather than sequentially. Product design, testing, manufacturing and process planning through logistics, for example, are done side-by-side and interactively. Potential problems in fabrication, assembly, support and quality are identified and resolved early in the design process.”
• Izuchukwu, John. “Architecture and Process :The Role of Integrated Systems in Concurrent Engineering.” Industrial Management Mar/Apr 1992: p. 19-23.
Basic Tenets of Concurrent Engineering
• Doing things simultaneously• Focusing on the Process• Converting hierarchical organizations into
teams
Product
development
Production of
components
Project
implementation
Partnering
the
supply chain
Committed leadership
Focus on the customer
Product Team Integration
Quality driven agenda
Commitment to people
- Key Drivers forChange
Key Project Processes
Targets forImprovement
Capital cost
Construction time
Predictability
Defects
Accidents
Productivity
Turnover & profits
-10%
-10%
+20%
-20%
-20%
+10%
+10%
The ‘Egan’ vision for change
CE implementation results into achieving improvement targets
Existing Construction Project Delivery Routes
• Design– Bid–Build • Design – Build • CM @ Risk• Integrated Project Delivery
Design– Bid–Build
No contractor involvement Design Competitive bidding Bid No overlap of design
and construction Build
CM-at-Risk
• Requires a commitment by the construction manager to deliver the project within a guaranteed maximum price (GMP)
Integrated Project Delivery
1. Mutual respect & trust2. Mutual benefit & reward3. Collaborative innovation & decision making4. Early involvement of key participants5. Early goal definition6. Intensified planning7. Open communication8. Appropriate technology9. Organization & leadership From AIA’s “Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide” (2007)
Factor Traditional Project Delivery Integrated Project DeliveryTeams Fragmented, assembled on “just-as-
needed” or “minimum-necessary” basis, strongly hierarchical, controlled
An integrated team entity composed of key project stakeholders, assembled early in the process, open, collaborative
Process Linear, distinct, segregated; knowledge gathered “just-as-needed;” information hoarded; silos of knowledge and expertise
Concurrent and multi-level; early contributions of knowledge and expertise; information openly shared; stakeholder trust and respect
Risk Individually managed, transferred to the greatest extent possible
Collectively managed, appropriately shared
Compensation / Reward
Individually pursued; minimum effort for maximum return; (usually) first-cost based
Team success tied to project success; value-based
Communications / Technology
Paper-based, 2 dimensional; analog
Digitally based, virtual; Building Information Modeling (3, 4 and 5 dimensional)
Agreements
Encourage unilateral effort; allocate and transfer risk; no sharing
Encourage, foster, promote and support multi-lateral open sharing and collaboration; risk sharing
References• The American Institute of Architects (AIA). 2007. Integrated Project Delivery: A
Guide. Version 1. [Online]. Available at: http://www.msa-ipd.com/IPD_Guide_2007.pdf
• Diekmann, J.E., Krewedl, M., Balonick, J., Stewart, J and Wonis, S (2004), “Application Of Lean Manufacturing Principles To ConstructioN, Construction Industry Institute Report 19, pp. 51-54
• Evbuomwan, N. F. O. and Anumba, C. J. (1998), “An Integrated Framework for Concurrent Life-cycle Design and Construction”, Advances in Engineering Software, 1998, Vol. 5, No. 7-9, pp.587-597
• NIST (2002) [Online] http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/oae/publications/gcrs/04867.pdf• Reid, S. (2011)“Operations Management” Wiley, pp. 20• Teicholz, Paul, discussion on the article “U.S. Construction Labor Productivity
Trends, 1970-1998, Paul M Goodrum and Carl T. Haas, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 427-429, September /October 2001.
Learning Resources
• Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)Introduction to Integrated Project Delivery (http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/limage?siteID=123112&imageID=16251278&id=6834016)
• Journal of Building Information Modelling (http://www.wbdg.org/references/jbim.php)
• Building Information Modelling (http://bim.arch.gatech.edu/content_view.asp?id=402 )