Instructional Program Data and Reflection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Instructional Program Data and Reflection

    1/3

    Maggie Kearns

    Phase 2

    Instructional Program ReflectionEdmark Reading Program

    Date # of Words2/4/13 15

    2/5/13 11

    2/6/13 13

    2/7/13 11

    3/8/13 15

    3/15/13 16

    3/28/13 15

    4/5/13 20

    4/11/13 24

    4/19/13 294/25/13 32

    Results Section

    Throughout the course of this program, Cs sight word recognition improved

    consistently. During baseline, C was able to recognize between eleven and fifteen words, and by

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    NumberofSightWords

    Identified

    Date of Assessment

    Edmark Reading Data

  • 7/30/2019 Instructional Program Data and Reflection

    2/3

    the end of the program she recognized 32 words from the Edmark sight word list. During the

    instruction phrase, C gained on average 4.25 words per week. At first, C was not completely on

    target with the aimline during the first four weeks of instruction, but after that she began to gain

    more words per week and began to exceed the goals.

    Discussion Section

    I believe that this program was moderately effective. While C made progress throughout

    the program, I believe that an alternative form of instruction may be more beneficial.

    Additionally, C had many health concerns during the first month of the program, resulting in

    inconsistent instruction and unusable data during that time period. Once Cs health was stabilized

    and instruction was occurring each day on a regular basis, she began making progress and

    gaining more words.

    In addition to the Edmark Reading program, I began also using another form of

    instruction. We had 26 cards, each with one letter of the alphabet. C would say the sound that

    each letter would make. Once done with this, we would put the letters together to make nonsense

    words. C would say each sound, then put together the entire word. I believe that this addition

    helped C to figure out some words that she would not know at first sight.

    C began to enjoy the program. She looked forward to doing well on the different aspects.

    It was very helpful that the program was not the same thing over and over again, but instead had

    many components that we would do each day. C really enjoyed reading the stories and using the

    phrase cards, which she would put in order to make the correct sequence of the pictures. Also, I

    think that C enjoyed the one-on-one time with me. Since this time was usually the only one-on-

  • 7/30/2019 Instructional Program Data and Reflection

    3/3

    one time that C received each day, she loved the individual attention and worked harder to excel

    at it.

    As I stated above, C had a lot of health problems during the first month or so of the

    program. This absolutely delayed progress, but once the health problems were no longer a

    concern she did much better. Additionally, Edmark is not the most exciting program. As Edmark

    is largely a sight word program, there could be much more interesting and active programs for

    students to learn sight words. There are many fun activities that can be done to learn sight words,

    rather than just sitting and reading words on a page. Finally, Edmark takes a very long time to

    conduct, whereas some other sight word programs may not take quite as long, allowing more

    time for instruction for other aspects of reading, as well as quicker progress towards learning the

    sight words.