21
Institutional Repositories: their contribution to sustainable development

Institutional Repositories:

  • Upload
    clark

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Institutional Repositories:. their contribution to sustainable development. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Institutional Repositories:

Institutional Repositories:

their contribution to sustainable development

Page 2: Institutional Repositories:

Development needs ScienceScience needs Access to Research

Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first prime minister, said: "It is science alone that can solve the problems of hunger

and poverty, of insanitation and illiteracy …

A1982 UNESCO report states that "assimilation of scientific and technological information is an essential

precondition for progress in developing countries".

The InterAcademy Council says: "In a world moving rapidly toward the knowledge-based economies of the

21st century, capacity building in science and technology is necessary everywhere. But the need is

greatest for the developing countries".

Page 3: Institutional Repositories:

A reminder of the scale of the problem

ACCESS STUDY

WHO study in 2003 showed:

Of 75 countries with GNP/per capita/yr < $1000, 56% of medical institutions had NO subscriptions to journals over the last 5 years

Of countries with GNP/capita/yr of $1-3000, 34% had NO subscriptions and a further 34% had an average of 2 subscriptions/yr

Situation unlikely to have changed much since 2003

Page 4: Institutional Repositories:

Some confusionsBOAI recommendations:

1. Self-archiving (OA Archives, Institutional Repositories) of published articles

2. Alternative journals (OA Journals)

Repositories:• Institutional Repositories (IRs, OAAs) primarily for

archiving already published research articles• Institutional Digital Archives (IDAs) for archiving an

institutes total digital record (theses, reports, assessment records, teaching products, pre-prints….)

Page 5: Institutional Repositories:

Institutional Repositories

A global network of interoperable archives

providing free access to already published research findings (author’s final version)

Subsidiary, bottom-up access strategy

working in parallel with OA or TA journals

Page 6: Institutional Repositories:

Technical Benefits from Institutional Repositories

– Free software, therefore appropriate for low-income countries

– Easy to establish, technical help available– All IRs are interoperable, conforming to OAI-MPH

international standards (www.oaister.org/about.html)– Distributed network, shared costs– Searchable by Google, Yahoo and specialised

search programs (eg OAIster, SHERPA searches)– Usage (impact) statistics available– If embargo, immediate deposit gives email options

Page 7: Institutional Repositories:

Strategic Benefits from Institutional Repositories

• Content free to all with access to Internet (Good for readers)

• Increases impact of articles (raises visibility of developing country science); increases usage, forges partnerships (Good for authors)

• Maximises return on investments (already being mandated by institutes and funding bodies) (Good for funders)

• Shows institutional achievement (Good for institutes)

• Administrative tool (eg RAE) (Good for institutes)

• Already ~900 established

• Little change to existing publishing practice – no new models required

Page 8: Institutional Repositories:

Any problems?

Yes! Researchers are merely humans and don’t bother to archive their publications (in spite of the fact that their work makes a far higher impact)! So IRs are proving slow to fill.

Studies show (A.Swan; A.Sale) researchers willingly archive if told [or mandated] to do so.

Like most of us, researchers respond to sticks and carrots!

Page 9: Institutional Repositories:

Author readiness to comply with a mandate

0 20 40 60 80 100

% respondents

Would complywillingly

Would complyreluctantly

Would notcomply

81%

14%

5%

Key Perspectives Ltd

Page 10: Institutional Repositories:

Recommended and agreed Mandates

Mandates to deposit authors’ copies in his/her IR at time of acceptance:

at April 17th 2007:

11 Institutional Mandates 3 Departmental Mandates12 Funders’ Mandates

6 further mandates proposed

Page 11: Institutional Repositories:

Where are they?

Registry of OA Repositories (http://roar.eprints.org/) shows between 8-900 established world-wide

Examples:

– Latin America – 83 (50 in Brazil)– EU countries – 350 (93 in UK)– India – 23– China – 9– South Africa – 7– Canada – 39– Australia - 33– USA - 211

Page 12: Institutional Repositories:
Page 13: Institutional Repositories:

And the cost is?

In India, for example:

• NCCR ‘Not very much’• ‘Depends if you have to buy a PC and if you

can use existing staff’• IISc (India) says new PC costs ~$555 IISc deposits papers and formats

abstracts/references for authors; two people’s salary costs $5500 per annum. Total $6055

• NIC (India) says they ‘used existing resources, so not very expensive’

Page 14: Institutional Repositories:

Driver Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research

The long-term vision: Pan-European Digital Repository Infrastructure

http://www.driver-repository.eu/

Page 15: Institutional Repositories:

The Depot deposit serviceWelcome to the DEPOT.

The DEPOT is a supporting service of the JISC Repositories and Preservation programme. Researchers based at UK institutions of higher and further education are welcome to use this national facility to deposit their peer-reviewed papers, articles, and book chapters (e-prints). The Depot contains full-text post-print research papers, with associated metadata and subject classification. The Depot is an OAI-compliant repository allowing your e-prints to be discovered and accessed throughharvesting services and search engines anywhere in the world.

The Depot conforms to W3C standards for conformity and validation, andSection 508 for accessibility.

http://depot.edina.ac.uk/

Part of the JISC IR Roadmap programme

Page 16: Institutional Repositories:

►And in the USA

InterAgency Working Group on Digital DataData, not articles as yet

22 agencies to develop infrastructure

►And in AUSTRALIAPartnership for Sustainable Repositories

Online Research Collections Australia:

ORCA Network

ORCA Registry

Page 17: Institutional Repositories:

►And globally >25,000 research individuals (including >1000 research organisations)

signed petition in support of recommendation

A1 of EU study:

“GUARANTEE PUBLIC ACCESS TO PUBLICLY-FUNDED RESEARCH RESULTS SHORTLY AFTER PUBLICATION“

Sponsors: DeFF JISC SPARC Europe SURF

Page 18: Institutional Repositories:

IRs for sustainable development?

A light at the end of the tunnel…..

Page 19: Institutional Repositories:

NEED ACCESS NOW!

(think malaria, HIV AIDS, climate change, avian ‘flu, tsunamis, conservation, taxonomy…..)

IRs should not be delayed while mega$ programmes are agreed and implemented. There is an urgent need

to support:

• Establishment of Institutional Repositories• Mandating author-deposit (and providing incentives)• Consider networking programmes for IRs (cf DRIVER

and DEPOT programmes, JISC Roadmap)

Page 20: Institutional Repositories:

‘Let 1000 OA flowers bloom’But don’t let planting the slow-growing mighty

oak trees delay the spread of easily established Indigenous Roses

Page 21: Institutional Repositories:

Thank you

Barbara [email protected]

Electronic Publishing Trust for Development

http://www.epublishingtrust.org