4
SIDELOBE LEVEL REDUCTION BY LWROVEMENT OF STRUT SHAPE Naoto Hatsunaka Shinichi Betsudan Takashi Katagi KokusaiDenshin Denwa Mtsubishi Electric co- Mitsubishi Electric Co. Co., LTD (KDD) Corn. Eqpt. Works Kamakura Works Tokyo, Japan Amagasaki, Japan Kamakura. Japan 1. Introduction From the vieupoint of effective utilization of both the geostationary orbit and the frequency spectrum in the satellite cornmication system, it characteristics in order to minimize the interference fromlto the adjacent is strongly required of the earth station antenna to have low sidelobe satellite and the terrestrial microwave links. The reference diagram of the sidelobe for a large antenna recommended by CCIR is drawn as follows: gain relative to an isotropic antenna and 0 is an offset angle from the main lobe axis in degrees. In the case of axisymmetrical Cassegrain antenna operated in the diffraction by the strut exceeds that shown in the above reference diagram circular polarization, the level of the cross-polar sidelobe due to the By introduction of a nev type of strut, the corresponding sidelobe c+n b e in the designated angular region on account of the strut arrangement, method based on GTD for improvingthe strut shape is presented together suppressed below that shown in the reference diagram. Herein. the design withthemeasuredvaluesof an Intelsat standard "A" earth station antenna havfng the improved s t r u t . The effectofthe improved s t r u t is clarified by comparing it with that of a conventional strut. 2. Analysis of the Sidelobe due to Diffraction by Strut G=32-2510@. dB(1°505480) : &-lo, dB(8>48°). where G is thesidelobe It is knom that the diffraction due to the strut causes the scatter- ing cone, resulting in a relatively high sidelobe with respect to that shom in the CCIR reference diagram.l) Figure 1 shows the measured and predicted sidelobe directions of the scattering cone in a conventional tripod case. the reference diagram, it is useful to direct the diffracted wave into the near-axis region vhile not concentrating it into the designated direction. The diffracted wave Ed due to an edge is expressedasfo1lovs:z) Ed EiD J " ' e-Jks In order to reduce the corresponding scattering cone level relative to S(p+s) - (1) where Ef is the incident field intensity, k is wave number,s is the dis- curvature of the diffracted wave-front and D is the edge diffraction tame from edge to the observing point, p is the principle radius of the coefficient. ents corresponding to co-polar and cross-polar components are expressed as follovs: TI TI In the case of circular polarization, the edge diffraction coeffici- e-jb sin 1 D= ( n singe cos+- ; for co-plar .-s$ sin 1 - (2) D = ( n she. cos d+d' ) ; cross-polar n vhere d. 4' and 0. are the angles shown in Figure 2. CH1672-5/81/0000-000496.$00.75 0 1981 IEEE. 496

[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society - Los Angeles, CA, USA (June 1981)] 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium

  • Upload
    t

  • View
    213

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society - Los Angeles, CA, USA (June 1981)] 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium

SIDELOBE LEVEL REDUCTION BY LWROVEMENT OF STRUT SHAPE

Naoto Hatsunaka Shinichi Betsudan Takashi Katagi

Kokusai Denshin Denwa M t s u b i s h i E l e c t r i c co- Mitsubishi Electric Co. Co., LTD (KDD) Corn. Eqpt. Works Kamakura Works Tokyo, Japan Amagasaki, Japan Kamakura. Japan

1. Introduct ion

From the v ieupoin t o f e f fec t ive u t i l i za t ion of bo th the geos ta t ionary o r b i t and the f requency spectrum in the satel l i te cornmicat ion system, i t

charac te r i s t ics in o rder to min imize the in te r fe rence f roml to the ad jacent is s t rongly required of the ear th s ta t ion antenna to have low sidelobe

s a t e l l i t e and t h e t e r r e s t r i a l microwave l inks . The reference diagram of the s idelobe for a large antenna recommended by CCIR i s drawn as follows:

g a i n r e l a t i v e t o an isotropic antenna and 0 is a n o f f s e t a n g l e from the main lobe axis in degrees .

In the case of axisymmetrical Cassegrain antenna operated in the

d i f f r a c t i o n by t h e s t r u t exceeds that shown i n t h e above reference diagram circular polar izat ion, the level of the cross-polar s idelobe due t o t h e

By introduction of a nev type of strut , the corresponding sidelobe c+n be in the designated angular region on account of the strut arrangement,

method based on GTD f o r improving the strut shape is presented together suppressed below t h a t shown in the reference diagram. Herein. the design

with the measured values of an In te l sa t s tandard "A" ear th s ta t ion an tenna havfng the improved s t r u t . The e f fec t o f the improved s t r u t i s c l a r i f i e d by comparing i t with that of a convent ional s t rut .

2. Analysis of the Sidelobe due to D i f f r ac t ion by S t r u t

G=32-2510@. dB(1°505480) : &-lo, dB(8>48°). where G is the s idelobe

It i s knom tha t t he d i f f r ac t ion due t o t h e s t r u t c a u s e s t h e s c a t t e r - ing cone , resu l t ing in a re la t ive ly h igh s ide lobe wi th respec t to tha t s h o m i n t h e C C I R reference diagram.l) Figure 1 shows the measured and predicted s idelobe direct ions of t h e s c a t t e r i n g cone i n a conventional tr ipod case.

the reference diagram, it is u s e f u l t o d i r e c t t h e d i f f r a c t e d wave i n t o t h e near-axis region vhile not concentrating i t into the designated direct ion.

The d i f f r a c t e d wave Ed due t o an edge is expressed as fo1lovs:z) Ed EiD J"' e-Jks

In order to reduce the corresponding scat ter ing cone level re la t ive to

S(p+s) - (1)

where Ef is the i nc iden t f i e ld i n t ens i ty , k is wave number,s is the dis-

curvature of the diffracted wave-front and D is the edge d i f f rac t ion t a m e from edge to the observing point , p is the p r inc ip le rad ius of the

c o e f f i c i e n t .

ents corresponding to co-polar and cross-polar components are expressed as fo l lovs : TI TI

In the case of c i r cu la r po la r i za t ion , t he edge d i f f r ac t ion coe f f i c i -

e-jb s i n 1 D = ( n s inge cos+- ; for co-plar

.-s$ s i n 1 - (2)

D = ( n s h e . cos d+d' ) ; cross-polar n

vhere d. 4' and 0. a r e t h e angles shown in F igure 2 .

CH1672-5/81/0000-000496.$00.75 0 1981 IEEE.

496

Page 2: [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society - Los Angeles, CA, USA (June 1981)] 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium

L*,the r e s u l t i n g d i f f r a c t e d wave i s expressed by the following equations. When a plane wave i s i n c i d e n t t o t h e s t r a i g h t s t r u t h a v i n g l e n g t h o f

E t = E i (?)( D)(-) 7 sinkY e-jks

Y = sin0,m s i n (Qm-B,m) kY --- ( 3 )

2 where 0,m and 0m are the re la t ive angle o f the inc ident wave and tha t o f the observ ing d i rec t ion to t h e s t r u t d i r e c t i o n , r e s p e c t i v e l y . The ca lcu la ted d i f f r ac t ion l eve l due t o va r ious s t ru t shapes a r e shown in F igure 3.

changing the ver t ica l angle (2%) of t h e s t r u t c r o s s s e c t i o n and by at tach- The d i f f r a c t e d wave can be d i rec ted in to the des i red d i rec t ion by

ing a t h i n f i n a t t h e v e r t e x o f t he s t ru t c ros s - sec t ion .

3 . Design of the Improved S t r u t

in Figure 4 was se l ec t ed . The respective edges denoted as Edges 1. 2 and 3 a r e so des igned t o be l a id z ig -zag a s t o d i r ec t t he d i f f r ac t ed wave i n t o the vide angular region. Dividing each edge into several sect ions, the t o t a l d i f f r a c t e d wave E d i s expressed as follows:

A s a r e s u l t o f p rev ious d i scuss ions , the c ross sec t ion of s t ru t shown

Ed = Ed ,jk &-(%;-fT) --- ( 4 ) m m-

where vectors Rm, s and show the cen ter of each sect ion, the observing d i r e c t i o n and the i nc iden ta l wave d i r ec t ion , r e spec t ive ly , The ca lcu la ted maximum s ide lobe leve l due to the des igned s t ru t , whose shape is shown i n Figure 5, is presented in F igure 6 , where the s ide lobe l eve l i s normalized t o t h a t shown i n t h e C C I R reference diagram.

cross-polar wide-angle radiation patterns are shown i n Figure 8, where t h e i s equipped wi th the des igned s t ru t as shown in F igure 7, and the measured

comparison i s a l s o made with those obtained when using a convent ional ly shaped s t r u t . The improvement of t he s ide lobe l eve l i s obvious on seeing i t i n not only i t s p r inc ip l e p l ane bu t a l so o f f - ax i s p l ane .

4 . Conclusion

The s tandard "A" e a r t h s t a t i o n a n t e n n a , i n s t a l l e d i n Yamaguchi, Japan,

of the axisymmetrical Cassegrain antenna can meet t h a t shown i n t h e C C I R r e fe rence d i ag ram in a l l d i r ec t ions fo r bo th co- and cross-polar senses in t h e 6682 band.

By adopting a uniquely shaped s t rut , the resul t ing wide-angle s idelobe

Denshin Denwa Co. LTD, for his constant encouragement. Thanks a r e a l s o due to the engineers of Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co. LTD and the engineers o f Mi t sub i sh i E lec t r i c Co. LTD. fo r t he i r va luab le d i scuss ions and e f f o r t s in manufacturing.

The authors wish to extend their thanks to Dr.T.Satoh of Kokusai

Reference (1) R.W.Kreute1, "Wide-Angle Sidelobe Envelopes of a Cassegrain Antenna",

(2) R.G.Kouyoumjian and P.H.Pathak, "A Uniform Geometrical Theory of Comsat Technical Review, Vo1.6. No.1, Spring, 1976.

D i f f r a c t i o n f o r an Edge i n a Perfectly Conducting Surface", Proc. IEEE, Vo1.62, No.11, Nov. 1974.

497

Page 3: [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society - Los Angeles, CA, USA (June 1981)] 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium

A, Angle Figure t . Scattering Cone

Figure. 2 Diffraction Wave

Fqre. 4 Strut Cross Section

Elevation Angle (Degree)

F i i r e . 6 Calculated Maximum Sidelobe Level due to Improved Strut (Tripod)

498

f & iirelmive onale 10 the direction

Figure. 3 Calculated Diffraction Level

-‘ L c ”- c

B - s 2

AA’ BE’

Fqre. 5 Designed Strut Construction

Page 4: [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society - Los Angeles, CA, USA (June 1981)] 1981 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium

Figure. 7 Slandord"A* Earth Slation Anlenna Equipped Wifh Improved Strut. IK D D, YAMAGUCHI , Japan 1

_---_ CClR Reference Diagram

El = 0'

Azimulh Angle (Degree)

( a ) I n case of Improved Tripod

-_-_ CClR Reference Diagrom

€ 1 = 0"

20 30 40 Azimuth Angle (Degree)

5 0 60 70 80 90

( b ) I n case of convenfonal Tripod

Figure. a Effecl of the Improved Strut (Cross-polar, 6. GHz)

499