Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1116 5 SEPTEMBER 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6201 sciencemag.org SCIENCE
Dipeptide repeat proteins block RNA biogenesis p. 1118
Microbial responses to nutrient stress p. 1120INSIGHTS
Greenland deglaciation puzzlesCLIMATE
Summer melt water on glacial ice, George VI Sound, Antarctica.
PERSPECTIVES
Nitrogen isotope data help to resolve puzzling observations during the last deglaciation
About 23,000 years ago, the southern
margins of the great Northern Hemi-
sphere ice sheets across Europe and
North America began to melt. The
melt rate accelerated ~20,000 years
ago, and global sea level eventually
rose by ~130 m as meltwater flowed into
the oceans. Ice cores from the Greenland
and Antarctic ice sheets show the rise in
atmospheric CO2 concentrations that ac-
companied this shift in global ice volume
and climate. However, discrepancies in the
temperature reconstructions from these
cores have raised questions about the long-
term relationship between atmospheric CO2
concentrations and Arctic temperature. On
page 1177 of this issue, Buizert et al. ( 1) re-
port temperature reconstructions from
three locations on the Greenland ice sheet
that directly address these problems.
The relative amount of heavy to light wa-
ter isotopes in snow mostly depends on how
cold it is when the snow falls. For this rea-
son, ratios of light to heavy water isotopes
By Louise Claire Sime from ice cores (see the figure) have long
been used to reconstruct past temperatures
in Antarctica and Greenland ( 2). These
temperature reconstructions, alongside ice
core CO2 records, have been crucial for ad-
vancing understanding of past climate, but
they also have puzzling features.
The first puzzle is the timing of North-
ern Hemisphere warming. Once a certain
mass of Northern Hemisphere ice has accu-
mulated, changes in Northern Hemisphere
summer insolation—that is, the amount of
solar irradiation received at Earth’s surface PH
OT
O:
BR
ITIS
H A
NT
AR
CT
IC S
UR
VE
Y
Published by AAAS
5 SEPTEMBER 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6201 1117SCIENCE sciencemag.org
during summer—are expected to initiate
melting. Northern Hemisphere warming
would thus be expected to precede or ac-
company Southern Hemisphere warming.
Yet, although most Northern Hemisphere
ice sheets were in retreat by ~19,000 years
ago ( 3), the Greenland isotopic record does
not begin to rise until ~14,700 years ago (see
the figure). Denton et al. ( 4) used the term
“mystery interval” to describe the Oldest
Dryas period (~18 thousand to 15 thousand
years ago), when Northern Hemisphere
summer insolation, Northern Hemisphere
ice melt, atmospheric CO2 concentrations,
and Southern Hemisphere temperatures
rose, yet Greenland water isotope ratios do
not record a similar rise in Northern Hemi-
sphere temperatures.
Using a general circulation model (GCM),
He et al. ( 5) have shown that allowing North-
ern Hemisphere ice sheet meltwater to flow
into the ocean generates a bipolar seesaw ef-
fect, with the Southern Hemisphere warming
at the expense of the Northern Hemisphere.
This effect is large enough to explain most
of the north-south onset discrepancy. In the
North Atlantic, surface freshwater from ice
melt inhibits the formation of dense salty
deep water, leading to extensive winter sea
ice in the Northern Hemisphere.
Buizert et al. further this analysis by ex-
ploiting the fact that water isotopes are not
the only way to track temperature in ice
cores. When snow becomes denser after it
has been deposited, the nitrogen isotope ra-
tio, δ15N, changes as a function of tempera-
ture, thus providing information that does
not depend on water isotope data. The au-
thors use δ15N to reconstruct temperatures
from three locations in Greenland. They
show that previous temperature recon-
structions based on water isotopes masked
a small temperature rise during the mystery
interval. Furthermore, the geographical pat-
tern of their results supports the idea that
the timing of the deglacial warming onset
strongly depended on heat transported by
the Atlantic Ocean ( 6). Thus, variations in
meltwater flowing into the North Atlantic,
via ocean circulation, largely controlled
both the timing and magnitude of the
onset of the Greenland deglacial warming
( 5, 6).
A second puzzle lies in the temperature
relationship between the Oldest Dryas and
the Younger Dryas (~12.8 thousand to 11.5
thousand years ago). Atmospheric CO2 con-
centrations rose by about 50 parts per mil-
lion (ppm) between these intervals. The
ocean likely delivered a similar amount of
heat to Greenland during each interval. Yet,
Greenland ice core temperature reconstruc-
tions based on water isotopes imply that the
Younger Dryas was colder than the Oldest
Dryas ( 7). Scientists have suggested that the
Younger Dryas was an outlier, triggered ei-
ther by a single catastrophic flood discharge
or a comet impact, but these ideas have lost
traction due to a lack of evidence ( 8). Climate
models predict that rising CO2 will cause a
rise in Greenland temperature. The colder
temperatures of the Younger Dryas thus rep-
resent the second puzzle.
Liu et al. ( 9) performed GCM simulations
of the whole period and also modeled water
isotope behavior during selected intervals.
Despite a simulated ~5°C Greenland warm-
ing, their modeled water isotope results
match the observed isotopic drop in the
Younger Dryas. Buizert et al.’s temperature
reconstructions confirm this warming. The
misleading water isotope results may have
come about because reduction in the North-
ern Hemisphere ice sheet height by 2 km
between the Oldest and the Younger Dryas
modified atmospheric circulation, causing a
relative increase in moisture advected from
the North Pacific region ( 9, 10) that reduced
water isotope ratios.
Buizert et al.’s successful Greenland tem-
perature reconstructions based on δ15N imply
that similar Antarctic core reconstructions
may be possible. Alongside GCM-based pa-
leoclimate modeling tools (5, 9), new Ant-
arctic temperature information could help
to clarify the relationship between Antarctic
climate and ice sheet changes. ■
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. C. Buizert et al., Science 345, 1177 (2014). 2. W. Dansgaard, Tellus 16, 436 (1964). 3. A. E. Carlson, K. Winsor, Nat. Geosci. 5, 607 (2012). 4. G. Denton, W. Broecker, R. Alley, PAGES News 14, 14
(2006). 5. F. He et al., Nature 494, 81 (2013). 6. J. D. Shakun, A. E. Carlson, Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 1801 (2010). 7. K. M. Cuffey et al., Science 270, 455 (1995). 8. W. Broecker et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 1078 (2010). 9. Z. Liu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10.1073/pnas.
1202183109 (2012). 10. P. Kindler et al., Climate Past Discuss. 9, 4099 (2013). 11. B. Lemieux-Dudon et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 8 (2010). 12. D. Lüthi et al., Nature 453, 379 (2008). 13. The Antarctic ice core record is an average of the Dome
C, EPICA (European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica) Dronning Maud Land, and Vostock water isotopes. The Greenland record is an average of the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP), GRIP, Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2, and Renland ice cores. Envelopes show the maximum and minimum values from each set of cores. Each ice core record is shown as an anomaly relative to the past 3000 years. All cores are on the Lemieux-Dudon et al. ( 11) time scale and are low-pass filtered at 3000 years for clarity. The summer Northern Hemisphere insolation record is solstice insolation at 60°N (W m−1). The CO
2 (ppmv)
record is from Lüthi et al. ( 12).
22 20 18 16 14 12 10
Age (ka B.P.)
470
490
510
530
180
220
An
t arc
tic
i so
t op
ic r
ec
or d
(δ
D ‰
)
Gre
en
lan
d is
oto
pic
re
co
rd (
δ18
O ‰
)
CO
2 (
pp
mv )
W/m
2
Ice sheetretreat begins
Older Dryas(mystery interval)
Bølling-Allerød
YoungerDryas Pre-boreal
Most NHice sheetsin retreat
270
−6
−2
2
−60
−40
−20
0
Sum
mer N
H in
solatio
n
10.1126/science.1257842
Glacial termination puzzles. Ice core water isotope records suggest that Greenland warmed suddenly and much
later than Antarctica, even though summer Northern Hemisphere insolation and atmospheric CO2 levels rose in
step with Antarctic warming. Buizert et al. report temperature reconstructions that help to resolve this puzzling
observation. Envelopes show the maximum and minimum values for each set of ice cores. See ( 13) for more details.
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Cambridge, CB23 7PP, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Published by AAAS