Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INSIGHT: Demographics 2015-16
Faculty of Engineering
2
Strategy, Planning and Governance have developed this pack to provide a portfolio of information about the students in your faculty. It is based primarilyon 2015-16 data generated for statutory reporting and reflects many of the queries we receive. It is designed to support decision-making across the year:we welcome all feedback as we develop this further.
Drill-down reports, to allow you to access the data which sits behind these charts, are available on the SPG Website at www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-
data/insight. These are Excel-based and can be downloaded.
Your StudentsFaculty of Engineering
Demographics
UK DOMICILES PAGE 6 - 13
Five Year Regional Comparison
Distance from TUOS
UG Postcodes
Programmes and Regions
EU STUDENTS PAGE 15 - 22
EU Students
Target Markets
Programme Growth
Share across EU Countries
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS PAGE 24 - 31
Overseas Numbers and Share across Levels
Programme Numbers
Target Country Groups
Top 10 PGT Countries
DEMOGRAPHICS PAGE 33 - 40
Student Characteristics
Gender at Programme Level
Module Choices and Gender by Level
WIDENING PARTICIPATION PAGE 42 - 49
WP Numbers and WP Criteria
POLAR numbers
Students with more than one WP Measure
Tariff of WP Students
DEMOGRAPHICS OVERVIEW PAGE 3 – 4
Regional Distribution of Undergraduate Entrants
EU and Overseas Summary
Where do your undergraduate entrants come from?
Demographics – UK Domiciles
How far do your undergraduate entrants travel?
0.4%
4.2%
15.7%
16.6%
12.6%
9.4%
1.9%
10.0%
10.4%
11.8%6.1%
0.8%
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF FCE STUDENTS* 2015
21%
27%
27%
27%
30%
30%
31%
31%
32%
32%
32%
33%
33%
33%
33%
33%
33%
34%
34%
34%
35%
37%
38%
40%
40%
41%
42%
43%
43%
44%
45%
47%
48%
49%
50%
50%
62%
64%
90%
100%
ARCCIV
TRPEAS
COMIPE
MATECNMDLGEOJNLPHI
MBBHSTBMSLSCPOL
CHMAPS
MECEEE
SOMMEDPHYCPEEGHPSYIPA
ACSSCS
MUSSMIDENHCSLAWMGTAAPEDUNURAMR
PROPORTION OF FCE STUDENTS* WITHIN 50 MILES 2015
*UK Full Time Undergraduate New Entrants *UK Full Time Undergraduate New Entrants
3
Has the EU primary market grown in recent years?
Demographics – EU and International
How different are home and overseas numbers?
FCA
FCE
FCMFCP
FCS
0
3,500
7,000
0 3,500 7,000
FCA
FCE
FCM
FCP
FCS
0
1,250
2,500
0 1,250 2,500
HOME & OVERSEAS STUDENTS2015
How many student are home and how many are overseas?
OVERSEAS STUDENTS 2015:CHINA
How many overseas students are from China, Singapore and Hong Kong?
More Overseas
More Home
China / HK/ Singapore
More Other
Overseas
3742
49
39
47
106103
87
77
89
27 27
33 3438
44
32
5560
67
139
129
95
124
112
0
50
100
150
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
FCS
FCE
FCP
FCA
FCM
EU NEW ENTRANTS STUDENTS: 2011 TO 2015 PRIMARY MARKETS*
EU NEW ENTRANTS STUDENTS: 2011 TO 2015
353
332
319
333
352
92
96
82
78
109
0 100 200 300 400 500
20112012201320142015
PrimaryDeveloping
*CyprusFranceGermanyGreeceItalyRomaniaSpain
4
UK Domiciles
5
Faculty of Engineering
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
6WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
6% 5%
26%29%
33%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
36
11
1
1
7
3
1
5
1
2
1
60
11
1
1
8
4
2
13
3
8
6
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
ACSU15
ACSU41
ACSU99
ACSU42
ACSU03
ACSU40
ACSU14
ACSU45
ACSU04
ACSU43
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
7WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
7% 4%
21% 22%
46%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
103.5
4
9
6
39
11
2
22
6.5
1
216.5
6
15
10
69
21
4
55
20.5
5
8
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
CIVU29
CIVU26
CIVU30
CIVU03
CIVU17
CIVU28
CIVU16
CIVU12
CIVU21
CIVU15
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Computer Science
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
8WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
7% 7%
24%21%
41%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
94.5
5
3
4
30
4
6
24
2
2
1
151
3
2
3
27
6
14
61
8
8
6.5
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
COMU06
COMU05
COMU41
COMU103
COMU119
COMU27
COMU101
COMU117
COMU199
COMU109
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
9WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
7% 5%
26%29%
33%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
134
5
7
4
17
6
9
73
12
1
222
5
7
4
22
8
13
123
26
5
8
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
CPEU13
CPEU16
CPEU99
CPEU02
CPEU18
CPEU05
CPEU03
CPEU20
CPEU09
CPEU19
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
10WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
12%8%
21% 21%
38%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
77
8
3
10
6
10
14
3
2
5
1
111
4
3
11
8
17
24
6
5
16
5
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
EEEU01
EEEU14
EEEU59
EEEU02
EEEU58
EEEU06
EEEU12
EEEU51
EEEU05
EEEU66
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
11WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
5% 3%12%
29%
50%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
26
1
1
1
3
7
103
1
2
7
45
4
4
5
7
1
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
MATU28
MATU29
MATU27
MATU38
MATU06
MATU16
MATU36
MATU37
MATU39
MATU99
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
12WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
6% 6%
19%
28%
41%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
170
1
4
41
19
16
5
5
1
386
1
5
77
42
36
12
12
10
4
2
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
MECU018
MECU99
MECU014
MECU004
MECU002
MECU015
MECU017
MECU006
MECU005
MECU008
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
Do your programmes draw predominantly from the local region or from further afield?
2015 UG student postcodes
Interdisciplinary Programmes Office, Engineering
Share of Students by Distance from TUOS 2015
13WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
The share of your student numbers by distance from Sheffield is shown here.
Do you draw students from near the University or do the majority of your students come from further afield?
Share of Cumulative Total Students by County 2011 - 2015
STUDENTS 2011 – 2015 ( New entrants)
6% 7%
15%
24%
47%
10-24m 25-49m 50-99m 100+m
Programme distances from SheffieldHow do the top recruiting programmes compare with the Department average?
Students
Russell GroupInstitutions
Sheffield
Each dot represents the postcode of a UG student in the Department.
How many of your students come from near Sheffield?
How many are drawn from near other Russell Group institutions?
154
7
14
30
27
28
7
9
9
7
4
377
10
26
68
63
72
20
29
29
27
22
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
DEPT
AERU13
BIEU20
AERU11
AERU14
AERU10
BIEU21
AERU15
BIEU19
AERU16
AERU12
Within 50 miles Over 50 miles
EU Domiciles
14
Faculty of Engineering
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
15WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
27 25
24
20 29
412
32
3
32
5
35
0
36
1
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
ACSU42
ACSU14
ACST01
ACSU03
ACSU43
ACSU15
ACSU46
ACSU01
ACST17
ACSU04
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
LithuaniaRomaniaItaly
SpainMalta
Bulgaria
France
Cyprus
Austria
Portugal
GreeceSlovenia
PolandDenmarkGibraltarFinlandSweden
GermanyAland Islands
Netherlands
Irish Republic
Estonia
Belgium
Slovakia
Latvia
CroatiaCzech…
LuxembourgHungary
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
16 17 15 12 14
9 36
612
2
5 3
2
3
0
20
40
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
16WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
36 66 72 53
47
66
7
59
8
615
62
2
63
9
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
CIVU03CIVU17
CIVU16
CIVU26
CIVU15
CIVU19
CIVU27
CIVU29
CIVT35
CIVU30
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10 15Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
CyprusItalyFrance
BulgariaLithuania
Poland
Greece
Romania
Malta
Germany
SpainGibraltar
HungarySwedenCroatiaAustriaAland Islands
SloveniaIrish Republic
Netherlands
Denmark
Portugal
Latvia
Slovakia
Estonia
BelgiumLuxembourg
Czech…Finland
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
24 47 49 33 31
4
9 8
6 67
1116
1511
0
40
80
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Computer Science
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
17WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
52 76 79 8
4
71
44
1
373
33
8
35
0
38
6
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
COMU103COMU101COMU27
COMU06
COMU41
COMU119
COMU43COMU33
COMU05
COMU109
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10 15Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
RomaniaCyprusBulgaria
SpainLithuania
Portugal
Greece
Italy
Slovakia
Czech…
LatviaGibraltar
FranceNetherlandsPolandHungarySweden
AustriaDenmark
Slovenia
Finland
Belgium
Luxembourg
Aland Islands
Malta
EstoniaIrish Republic
CroatiaGermany
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
31 51 56 57 50
9
77 7
6
11
1815
19
14
0
45
90
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
18WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
30 18 32
26
26
782
50
6
56
8
59
5
68
3
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
CPEU03
CPEU02CPET04
CPET01
CPET06
CPEU05
CPEU18CPEU99
CPEU20
CPEU170%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
CyprusIrish RepublicSpain
GreeceItaly
Netherlands
Gibraltar
Austria
Lithuania
Czech…
PolandGermany
RomaniaMaltaFranceEstoniaSlovakia
LuxembourgBulgaria
Denmark
Finland
Portugal
Latvia
Sweden
Slovenia
Aland IslandsCroatia
BelgiumHungary
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
18 12 24 19 18
3
3
5
21
8
3
3
5 7
0
20
40
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
19WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
34 35 41
42
37
726
53
2
59
8
59
4
69
0
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
EEEU05
EEEU01
EEEU59
EEEU58
EEEU02
EEEU66
EEEU53EEEU57
EEEU54
EEEU060%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
RomaniaCyprusSpain
GreeceFrance
Bulgaria
Germany
Lithuania
Italy
Estonia
Czech…Finland
DenmarkSlovakiaAustriaLatviaMalta
LuxembourgNetherlands
Portugal
Poland
Gibraltar
Belgium
Sweden
Slovenia
Aland IslandsCroatia
Irish RepublicHungary
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
29 29 33 35 30
3 2
4 3
32 4
4 4
4
0
25
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
20WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
20 20 24
16 15
46
1
33
3
36
4
375
44
4
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
MATU05
MATT52
MATU16
MATU06
MATU39
MATT107
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
PolandLithuaniaCyprus
PortugalSpain
Germany
Greece
Belgium
Malta
Italy
SlovakiaNetherlands
LuxembourgEstoniaAustriaGibraltarFrance
SwedenFinland
Aland Islands
Croatia
Irish Republic
Romania
Czech…
Slovenia
DenmarkBulgaria
LatviaHungary
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
10 14 15 11 9
7 1 1
1 5
3 57
4 1
0
15
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
21WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
77 29 44 63
66
1,0
96
792
92
3
1,0
03
1,0
17
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
MECU001
MECU002
MECU014
MECU015
MECU006
MECT53
MECT31
MECU017
MECU018
MECT40
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 10 20Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
ItalyCyprusSpain
GreeceFrance
Romania
Lithuania
Germany
Netherlands
Bulgaria
PolandHungary
BelgiumPortugalLatviaFinlandGibraltar
Irish RepublicCzech…
Estonia
Austria
Aland Islands
Slovakia
Croatia
Slovenia
DenmarkSweden
LuxembourgMalta
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
61 22 37 52 59
7
5
5
75
9
2
2
42
0
40
80
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
Which programmes has EU student number growth come from?
How many EU Students do you have? Total EU student numbers by country
Interdisciplinary Programmes Office, Engineering
Share of Student Population (2015) from EU Countries:
Target Markets – UG and PG
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for EU students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static.
22WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
EU and Non EU Domiciled Students:
EU Students are domiciled in EU countries. They may be Home or Overseas Fee Payers
Is there an even spread of students from different countries, or is your population dependent on one or two?
52
40
700 6
0 0
62
2
0%
50%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
EU Other
AERU10
AERU14
AERU11
BIEU19
BIEU20
AERU12
AERU15
BIEU22
AERU13
AERU16
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 5 10 15Students on Programme 2015
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Static Large and Static
RomaniaItalyBulgaria
SpainCyprus
Poland
Hungary
Lithuania
Portugal
France
GreeceGermany
NetherlandsLuxembourgAustriaEstoniaDenmark
LatviaSlovakia
Aland Islands
Czech…
Irish Republic
Belgium
Malta
Slovenia
GibraltarSweden
CroatiaFinland
Cumulative Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
30 0 0 0 20
9
0 0 0
10
13
0 0 0
10
0
30
60
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary Secondary Developing
International Numbers
23
Faculty of Engineering
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
24
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
46 4231
4657
121 126
149
128137
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
39 46 58 43 47
7357 70
53 66
923 21
3224
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
ACST01
ACSR31
ACSU03
ACSU15
ACSU14
ACST17
ACSR11
ACSU01
ACSU02
ACST46
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 15 30 45 60
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
35
70East Asia
Middle East
South Asia
SE Asia
Central Asia
Not Targetted
West Africa
Latin America
East Africa
North America
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
25
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
137130
108 111120
152 149156 151 148
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
48 41 67 72 64
9596
8365
73
9 12 6 14 11
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
CIVT07CIVU17CIVT02
CIVU03
CIVU16
CIVT35
CIVT16
CIVT65
CIVT104
CIVR31
0%
20%
40%
0 15 30 45
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
20
40
60
80East Asia
SE Asia
Middle East
South Asia
Not Targetted
East Africa
Latin America
Central Asia
North America
West Africa
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Computer Science
Students by Country Group 2015
26
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
95
7987
111
134
86
7181 86 85
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
25 25 20 24 22
5436
4247 53
7 1019 15 10
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
COMT138
COMT06
COMT123
COMR33COMU101
COMU27
COMU05
COMR31
COMT127
COMR130%
20%
40%
0 10 20
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
25
50East Asia
Middle East
West Africa
South Asia
Latin America
SE Asia
East Africa
Central Asia
Not Targetted
North America
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
27
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
107
133149 147
211
156
211191
219
193
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
38 28 38 57 50
109
162143
128 126
9 21 1034
17
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
CPET01CPET03
CPEU02
CPEU03
CPET30
CPET04CPER31
CPER35
CPER34
CPER330%
20%
40%
0 15 30 45 60 75
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
40
80East Asia
SE Asia
Middle East
West Africa
Latin America
South Asia
Not Targetted
East Africa
Central Asia
North America
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
28
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
75 66 6086 89
215
251226
276256
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
69 78 75 96 78
112 125 118 130136
34 48 33 50 42
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
EEET13EEER31
EEET30
EEEU01
EEET01
EEEU05
EEEU02
EEEU13
EEER11
EEET26
0%
20%
40%
0 30 60 90
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
40
80
120
160East Asia
SE Asia
Middle East
South Asia
West Africa
Not Targetted
Latin America
Central Asia
East Africa
North America
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
29
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
5864
56
8277
104
128 128 132126
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
23 37 30 23 23
5373
7979 80
28 18 19 30 23
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
MATT52
MATT03
MATU05
MATT16
MATR32
MATT10
MATT64
MATR31
0%
20%
40%
0 15 30
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
20
40
60
80East Asia
South Asia
Middle East
Latin America
SE Asia
West Africa
Not Targetted
Central Asia
East Africa
North America
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
30
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
142
189202 192
230
177
222242
188 197
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
85 85 101 90 79
71
115118
68
82
21 22 2330 36
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
MECU002
MECT53
MECU001
MECT40
MECT30
MECT50
MECR31
MECR33
MECT31
MECU015
0%
20%
40%
0 15 30 45 60
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
30
60
90
120East Asia
SE Asia
Middle East
South Asia
West Africa
Latin America
Not Targetted
North America
East Africa
Central Asia
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Country groups
Which programmes do international students choose?
Student numbers by country – new entrants by year
Interdisciplinary Programmes Office, Engineering
Students by Country Group 2015
31
International Students: 2011 - 2015 Share by Level: 2011 - 2015
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
0 0 0
168
212
0 0 0
63
34
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Home International
0 0 0 63 340 0 0
0 0
0 0 02011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UGT PGT PGR
20
15 S
ha
re o
f 2
011
–2
015
To
tal
BIEU20
AERU11
AERU12
AERU10
BIEU19
AERU15
BIEU22
0%
20%
40%
60%
0 15
Small & Growing Large & Growing
Small & Declining Large and Declining
Students on Programme 2015
0
10East Asia
SE Asia
West Africa
Middle East
South Asia
Central Asia
Latin America
Not Targetted
East Africa
North America
Programmes listed are the top 10 recruiting programmes for International students in 2015.
How numbers in 2015 compare to the previous five years indicates which programmes are growing and which have been more static or have declined.
Country groupings are as targetted by the International Office
Total Students by Country 2011 - 2015
Demographics
32
Faculty of Engineering
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
33WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
30%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
ACSR31
ACSU15ACST01
ACSU03
ACSU14
ACSU42
ACSU04
ACSU43
ACSU01ACST17
-25%
0%
25%
0% 25%
ACS317
ACS318
ACS323
ACS327
ACS329
ACS336
0%
25%
0% 25%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
34WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
20%
40%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
CIVU03CIVU17
CIVU16CIVR31
CIVT07
CIVU12
CIVU26
CIVU30
CIVU21
CIVT02
-25%
0%
25%
0% 25%
CIV2773
CIV321
CIV337
0%
100%
0% 100%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Computer Science
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
35WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
25%
50%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
COMU101COMU103
COMR33
COMU27
COMT138
COMR31
COMU06
COMU05
COMT123
COMU119
-25%
0%
25%
0% 25%
COM3001
COM3190
COM3240
COM3310
COM3420
COM3501
COM3502
COM3503
0%
25%
0% 25%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
COM2005
COM1006
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
36WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
15%
30%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
CPEU02CPET01
CPER31
CPET04
CPEU20
CPEU05
CPET03
CPET30
CPEU18
-30%
0%
30%
0% 30%
CPE317
CPE322
CPE323
0%
50%
0% 50%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
37WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
40%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
EEER31
EEET13
EEEU59
EEEU01
EEEU02
EEEU05EEEU06
EEEU58
EEEU13
EEET01
-20%
0%
20%
0% 20%
EEE112
EEE124
EEE163
EEE260
EEE307
EEE317
EEE334
EEE335
EEE337
EEE338
EEE339
EEE347
EEE348
0%
60%
0% 60%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
38WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
40%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
MATU05MATR31
MATU06
MATR32
MATT52
MATU29
MATR81
MATR50
MATT64
MATT03
-30%
0%
30%
0% 30%
MAT1410
MAT1910MAT1920
MAT2410
MAT2920MAT2930
MAT306
MAT3210
MAT333
MAT3332
MAT339
MAT3411
MAT373
MAT3810
MAT3840
0%
50%
0% 50%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Department of Mechanical Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
39WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
25%
50%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
MECU001MECU002
MECU014
MECR31
MECU004
MECT53MECR33
MECU015
MECT40
MECU017
-25%
0%
25%
0% 35%
MEC301
MEC302
MEC303MEC307
MEC308
MEC310
MEC312
MEC313
MEC314
0%
20%
0% 20%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Which programmes drive your gender balance?
Does gender impact on module choice?
How does this impact on diversity?
What does your student population look like?
Interdisciplinary Programmes Office, Engineering
What does your student population look like?
Is there a balance between different demographic groups or is your Department over or under represented in some areas?
How does your Department compare to the University?
GENDER M F
AGE Y M
MODE F P
ETHNICITY W B
Less Diverse M
ore D
iverse
40WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Each student has been allocated a type – Male or Female, Young or Mature, Full Time Or Part Time and White or BME.
The numbers of the sixteen combinations of students are shown here:
Student Population (all levels) 2015/16:
Female Dominated
Male Dominated
The top 10 optional modules by level for 2015 are shown here.
The proportions of these modules chosen by male and female students are used to indicate where modules are more popular with one or other gender.
Small & Female Dominated Large & Female Dominated
Small & Male Dominated Large & Male Dominated
The top 10 recruiting programmes (all levels) in 2015 are shown here.
The gender split on each programme has been compared to the 2015 Department average to reveal which programmes are driving this average.
Va
ria
nc
e to
Dep
art
men
t
Share of students on programme
% of Female Students on Module
% o
f M
ale
Stu
den
ts o
n M
od
ule
0%
50%
100%
BME
Female
Mature
PT
White
Male
Young
FT
Dept TUOS
0%
30%
60%
MYFW
FYFW
MMFW
FMFW
MYPW
FYPW
MMPW
FMPW
MYFB
FYFB
MMFB
FMFB
MYPB
FYPB
MMPB
FMPB
Dept TUOS
AERU11
AERU10
AERU14
BIEU20
BIEU19
AERU12
AERU15AERU16
BIEU21
AERU13
-30%
0%
30%
0% 30%
AER385
AER389
AER398
AER399
0%
90%
0% 90%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Widening Participation
41
Faculty of Engineering
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
42
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
9 14 8 11 19
13 7 11 14 20
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
11%
27%
2% 3%
25%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
2
4
13
15
In Care
Social Economic Class
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
1st Generation in HE
Index of Multiple Deprivation
4
3
1
4
3
5
4
2
3
5
6
3
4
3
3
10
5
6
6
4
14
9
6
5
7
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
5
10
15
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
5
10
15
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
3 4 1 3 4
3 1 3 1
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
2 5 3 4
1 1 2
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
321 (25)
324 (11)
327 (9)
331 (105)
334 (10)
In Care
IMD
Disability
LPN
Not WP
SEC
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
43
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
24 29 32 29 18
57 41 50 59 79
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
0%
2%
-1%
-9%
-5%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
3
4.5
14
19
In Care
Social Economic Class
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
Index of Multiple Deprivation
1st Generation in HE
5
6
6
7
8
11
9
8
6
11
16
11
15
17
7
20
22
17
11
19
46
30
37
29
36
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
10
20
30
40
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
5
10
15
20
25
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
8 7 6 6 5
4 3 5 4
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
11 14 17 14
6 6 7
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
337 (63.5)
339 (18.5)
346 (39)
346 (271)
354 (19)
In Care
IMD
LPN
SEC
Not WP
Disability
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Computer Science
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
44
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
10 19 22 33 23
35 30 28 47 79
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
-8%
-1%
4%
-1%-1%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
1
2
5.5
18.5
31
Social Economic Class
In Care
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
Index of Multiple Deprivation
1st Generation in HE
6
7
12
4
3
10
9
10
9
9
12
13
9
9
10
26
18
8
11
12
49
34
13
17
12
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
10
20
30
40
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
3 4 12 7 6
3 11 3 4
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
5 9 11 18
3 10 6
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
320 (8)
320 (2)
320 (18.5)
323 (37.5)
328 (173.5)
330 (21.5)
Disability
In Care
LPN
IMD
Not WP
SEC
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
45
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
13 24 35 41 40
41 25 46 47 111
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
-6%
10%
3%5%
2%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
1
14
34
42
In Care
Social Economic Class
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
Index of Multiple Deprivation
1st Generation in HE
14
5
7
6
9
12
9
8
6
5
31
10
16
7
10
38
25
22
12
11
55
33
28
18
19
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
9 6 7 5 14
6 7 4 9
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
4 6 20 24
1 6 11
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
336 (46)
340 (89)
344 (27)
344 (5)
344 (287)
In Care
SEC
IMD
LPN
Disability
Not WP
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
46
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
17 25 11 35 19
32 27 22 33 41
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
5%
9%
-6%
10%8%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
1
1
6
13
15
Social Economic Class
In Care
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
1st Generation in HE
Index of Multiple Deprivation
6
15
2
7
3
8
8
3
5
9
10
10
6
13
11
13
11
9
10
9
23
23
13
17
17
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
10
20
30
40
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
5
10
15
20
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
3 7 2 15 6
6 1 13 3
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
11 15 6 17
8 1 10
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
312 (18)
316 (201)
316 (37)
319 (14)
319 (24)
In Care
LPN
Not WP
IMD
Disability
SEC
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
47
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
10 11 12 18 9
19 20 17 23 30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
4%
-4%
2%2%
-1%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
1
1
7
7
In Care
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
Social Economic Class
Index of Multiple Deprivation
1st Generation in HE
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
4
3
8
5
3
7
3
11
10
10
6
11
17
18
11
12
11
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
1 2 1 2 1
2 1 1
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
5 4 5 10 1
1 1 2
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
318 (11)
326 (16)
327 (23)
332 (5)
339 (104)
In Care
Disability
SEC
IMD
LPN
Not WP
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
48
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
35 41 45 48 35
79 96 95 90 127
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
1%
-9%-8%
-7%
-2%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
1
5
10
28
42
Social Economic Class
In Care
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
Index of Multiple Deprivation
1st Generation in HE
10
8
10
5
9
15
18
10
10
10
25
19
21
30
14
36
27
32
30
29
76
51
66
62
50
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
10
20
30
40
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
9 5 10 8 10
1 7 5 8
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
20 20 23 25
5 8 7
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
346 (23)
359 (55)
359 (73)
364 (28)
364 (519)
380 (1)
Disability
SEC
IMD
LPN
Not WP
In Care
Are these students distinctive?
How many students come from each POLAR quintile?
Which outreach criteria do they meet?
How many of your students have WP backgrounds?
Interdisciplinary Programmes Office, Engineering
Note: Students can be in more than one category
Do students have more than one outreach measure?:
LPN Students on the IMD: WP SEC Students on the IMD:
Do many of students attend state school but are not WP?
49
Tariff on entry of WP Students
WEBSITE LINK: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
Are WP students being offered places on lower tariff?:
Is there overlap between LPN, IMD and SEC criteria?
0 0 0 65 42
0 0 0
82 144
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WP
Not WP
0% 0% 0%
3%
-1%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Growth in WP vs. Faculty Average
2
13
35
49
In Care
Social Economic Class
Disability
Lower Participation Neighboughood
Index of Multiple Deprivation
1st Generation in HE
13
14
0
0
0
18
16
0
0
0
38
24
0
0
0
45
31
0
0
0
72
57
0
0
0
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Polar 1 Polar 2 Polar 3 Polar 4 Polar 5
WP HIGHEST PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
State School One Two Three +
0
10
20
30
40
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
One Two Three +
14 13
9 8
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
LPN IMD of LPN population
36
11
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
S.E.C IMD of S.E.C Population
320 (1)
327 (104)
328 (39)
332 (66)
339 (402)
Disability
In Care
IMD
LPN
SEC
Not WP
Strategy, Planning & Governance Contacts:
FACULTY PSO
ARTS Becky Carpenter
ENGINEERING Christine Wilson-Bolton
MEDICINE James Mumford
SCIENCE Laura Filsak
SOCIAL SCIENCES Mark Shephard
REPORTING AREA LEAD CONTACT
NSS Becky Carpenter
REGISTRATIONS & TARGETSWPMEDICAL SCHOOL
Catherine Spencer
PROGRAMMESMODULESSPACESTAFF PROFILEEUINTERNATIONALDEMOGRAPHICS
Felicity Bingham
TARIFFSATTAINMENTSPG RECRUITMENTPROGRESSIONUG TO PG PROGRESSIONUK DOMICILESLANGUAGES FOR ALL
Mark Shephard
50
PROJECT AREA CONTACT
Business Planning / Management Information Tom Chapman
Management Information / Data Sourcing Felicity Bingham
Planning Support Officer Contacts:
Business Intelligence / Management Information (BI / MI) Project Contacts:
Further Information
This pack represents version one of an ongoing piece of work to increase thevisibility of consistent student information and reporting across theuniversity. In some cases new data has been explored and new metricsdeveloped to try to give an overview of student behaviour at departmentallevel.
While every care has been taken to ensure that this information is fit for purpose, issues with the accuracy and consistency of the raw source data mean that a level of assumption has been necessary in some places. We hope that reporting at this level will encourage both central and academic departments to work with us to improve data management.
We very much welcome constructive feedback on the dashboards andmeasures used and in particular we are interested in hearing whichreporting is most useful, what requires further development and what is lessuseful for departments and faculties. Your feedback will be used to informdevelopment of the second iteration of the dashboards in December 2016along with future plans for system-based management information.
More detailed reporting is available on our website and this data is takenfrom the same sources and transformed in the same way as that used tocreate this pack. If the analysis that you require is not currently available, ourintention is to develop bespoke reporting to meet your requirements so thatall areas of the university have access to the consistent information theyneed to support decision making.
All feedback and questions should be sent, in the first instance, [email protected].
Thank you.
Strategy, Planning & Governance
December 2015
51
Reporting IndexReporting Available at:https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/spg/mi-data/insight
RECRUITMENT STUDENT EXPERIENCE DEMOGRAPHICS
Schools Staff Types Demographics - UK Postcodes and Distances
New Entrants by School Staff Types Student Numbers by Distance from Sheffield
New Entrants by Distance and School Staff Age Groups TUOS UK Student Postcodes
Requested and Actual Tariffs Staff Gender Breakdown Student Postcodes by Faculty
Average Tariffs Requested and Achieved by Department Staff Home & Overseas Breakdown Student Postcodes by Department
Average Tariffs Requested and Achieved by Programme Staff Student Ratios Student Postcodes by Programme
Variance in Tariff Performance SSR Demographics - Gender
NSS Results Staff Student Ratio: Academic Staff Only Student Numbers by Gender (Department Level)
NSS and Tariff Scores Ratio of Students to Admin Staff Student Numbers by Gender (Programme Level)
PGT Recruitment NSS Results Demographics - Mature Students
Internal and External PGT Recruitment NSS Results - Department Level Student Numbers - Young / Mature (Department Level)
Internal and External PGR Recruitment NSS Results - Course Level Student Numbers - Young / Mature (Programme Level)
PG Recruitment Source (Internal) NSS Results - Department Response Rates Demographics - BME
PG Recruitment Source (External) NSS Results - Course Response Rates Student Numbers - BME (Department Level)
Prior Attainments of PG Students Student Numbers - BME (Programme Level)
PG Students with Qualifications from Sheffield Demographics - FT and PT
PG Students with Qualifications from Other Institutions Student Numbers by Mode (Department Level)
Student Numbers by Mode (Programme Level)
PROGRESSION AND OUTCOMES PROGRAMMES AND MODULES DEMOGRAPHICS Demographics - BME
Student Numbers - BME Breakdown (Department Level)
Progression Student numbers on programmes Demographics - International Students Student Numbers - BME Breakdown (Programme Level)
Department Progression Students on Single programmes Student Numbers - TUOS Regions Student Numbers - Ethnicity Breakdown by Department
Programme Progression Students on Dual programmes Student Numbers - TUOS Countries Student Numbers - Ethnicity Breakdown by Programme
Progression By Tariff Students on PGT programmes Student Numbers - International Students by Country Demographics - Home and Overseas
Progression By Gender Students on PGR programmes Student Numbers - International Students by Department Student Numbers - Home and Overseas (Department Level)
Progression By Domicile Student numbers on modules Student Numbers - Department Numbers by Country Student Numbers - Home and Overseas (Programme Level)
Progression By Mode Modules by Department Student Numbers - Programme Numbers by Country Demographics - Widening Participation StudentsUG to PG Progression Single programmes - students on modules Demographics - International Country Groups WP by Faculty
Conversion to PG Dual programmes - students on modules Regions - TUOS Country Groups WP by Department
Single and Dual Conversion to PG PGT programmes - students on modules Countries - TUOS Country Groups WP by Programme
Time to Convert Module Choices Country Groups by Department Demographics - Widening Participation Criteria
Conversion by Course Students on Core Modules Country Groups by Programme State School
Internal Movement to PG Courses Students on Optional Modules Demographics - EU Students 1st Generation in HE
Degree Classification Average Module Cohorts by Programme EU Student Numbers - TUOS Countries Index of Multiple Deprivation
Good Honours by Department Module Attainments EU Student Numbers - EU Students by Country Socio Economic Class
Good Honours by Programme Attainments by Module EU Student Numbers - EU Students by Department Disability
Good Honours by Qualification on Entry Module Attainments by Gender EU Student Numbers - Department Numbers by Country Lower Participation Neighbourhood
Good Honours by Tariff on Entry Attainments by Assessment EU Student Numbers - Programme Numbers by Country Care Leavers
Degree Classifications by Group Module Contact Time Demographics - EU Target Markets POLAR Quintile 1
Good Honours by Gender Independent Learning Hours by Module EU Student Numbers - Target Markets POLAR Quintiles
Good Honours by Domicile Teaching Time by Module EU Student Numbers - Target Markets by Country Demographics - WP Tariffs by Department
Good Honours by Mode Load EU Student Numbers - Target Markets by Department
Good Honours by Disabled Status Load by Programme EU Student Numbers - Target Markets by Programme
Good Honours by BME Status Load by Module Demographics - UK Domiciles OTHER INFORMATION
Postgraduate Attainment Space UK Student Numbers by Region
Postgraduate Outcomes by Department Building Usage UK Student Numbers by Department Languages For All
Distinctions by Gender Students by Building UK Student Numbers by Programme Languages Taken By Programme
Distinctions by Domicile Timetable Hours by Module UK Regions - by Faculty
Distinctions by Mode UK Regions - by Department
Postgraduate Status UK Regions - by Programme
PHD Outcomes by Department
PHD Years to Completion
PHD Years to Completion by Funding
