Upload
frost-sullivan
View
12.843
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Biocompatible Protective Coatings Widen Application
Scope in Medical Devices, Finds Frost & Sullivan
Research PREVIEW for the
Innovations in Protective Coatings for Medical Devices
(D556-TI)
D556-TI 2
Contents
Section Slide Numbers
Executive Summary 4
Technology and Industry Overview 8
• Industry Trends- Medical Devices 9
• Need for Protective Coatings on Implants 11
• Technology Snapshot 12
• Types of Protective coatings- By Application 13
• Regulatory Scenario 18
• Protective Coatings–Manufacturing Process 19
• Technology Capability 20
• Value Chain Analysis 21
Impact Assessment and Analysis 24
• Market Impact of Drivers 25
• Market Impact of Challenges 26
• Recent Innovations and their Market Significance 28
• Demand Side Analysis 30
D556-TI 3
Section Slide Numbers
• Opportunity Evaluation and Technology RoadMapping 31
• Emerging Opportunities–Types of Coatings 32
• Assessment of Emerging Opportunities 33
• Technology Strategy Management 35
• Technology Roadmap 36
• Key Patents 42
• Key Contacts 48
• Appendix 51
• The Frost and Sullivan Story 58
Contents
D556-TI 4
Key Findings
1
US demand for implantable medical devices is forecasted to be around $52 billion in 2015 and the market is expected to
grow around the rate of 7.7% annually for the next 3 years. Orthopedic implants will remain the largest and one of the fastest
growing segment. Cardiac pacing devices will lead gains among cardiovascular implants. Other implants expected to do well
include neuro stimulators and drug implants. The implant market will have a huge impact on the protective coating market.
2
Protective coating industries will be more productive and emerging in the North American region. Diverse developments will
also be seen in Europe after North America. The Asia Pacific countries may not see much significant growth in terms of
technology development as US or European countries; but developments in Japan and China will contribute significantly to
the rise of the technology. Nevertheless, in the future, there is huge market potential for these technologies developed in
North America and Europe in the APAC region.
3 Stakeholder initiatives, especially collaborations will take a major step in the advancement of protective coating technologies.
Across globe, technology advancements from research institutes, academia and medical device manufacturers help in
increasing the adoption of protective coatings. Also, there is increase in number of government funded research consortiums
in the European region.
4 From passivation coatings to anti-thrombogenic coatings to dental implants or neurovascular implants productive innovations
are being implemented across the globe. More developments are in the pipeline for patents. ISO and ASTM are developing
more standards for the upcoming industry trends in protective coatings.
5 By 2020, the protective coating industry shall see a massive surge in developments and a whole range of improved
biocompatible and durable implant devices for orthopaedic, orthodontic, and cardiac applications ready to be commercialized
across the world.
D556-TI 5
Overview
• Protective coatings used on medical implants help the implant function in an hostile environment by
protecting them against microbial attacks and bodily fluids; and preventing any sort of foreign body
reaction (FBR).
• It prevents triggering of any allergic reactions unlike conventionally used metallic or alloy orthopedic
implants.
• The type and method of coating the implant varies with the end use application and the geometry of the
implant.
• Various stakeholders have come up with several proprietary and patented methods and types of
coatings.
Significance
• Similar to any other medical invasive procedure, traditionally used implants are leading to various
complications such as inflammation, infection, and allergic side effects. All of these increase the chance
of fibrous encapsulation, induced thrombosis, and rejection of the implants by the body.
• These drawbacks of traditional implants clearly highlight significance of protective coatings on implants.
Protective coatings can prevent the above mentioned complications by properly customizing it to the
specific functionality of implants.
Benefits
• Protective coatings can be customized to get higher corrosion resistance and improved wear resistance,
which can be effectively implemented for orthopedic implants.
• Specialized coating and coating techniques can be designed to propagate the growth of desirable
endothelial cells rather than smooth muscle cells and to prevent aggressive cell growth.
• Specialized coatings can also prevent release of harmful metallic ions into the body.
Technology Snapshot
D556-TI 6
Need for Protective Coatings on Implants
Implant Failure
Thrombosis
Infection Corrosion and
Mechanical Failure
Defective Surgical
Procedure
Implants generally fail due to four different causes:
• Thrombosis is caused due to the element of shear stress
that the blood is subjected to when flowing near to the
implants.
• Surface characteristics of the implants contribute
significantly to the failure of implants due to infections.
• Corrosion and mechanical failures mainly occur in alloy
and metallic implants used for orthopedic and orthodontic
applications.
• Defective surgical procedure can be a cause of implant
failure, wherein the failure could be a resultant of
improper location of implants or improper sterilization of
implants or invasive surgical instruments.
• Thrombosis: Formation of blood clots on implants like stent and catheters that will lead to implant rejection.
• Infection: Infection caused during the implantation procedure or in-vivo will propagate bio-film and associated
complications would lead to implant rejection.
• Corrosion: Corrosion of implants is a major concern particularly for orthopedic and orthodontic implants. Corrosion would
lead to allergic reactions and reduced mechanical strength of the implant, hence requiring replacement.
• Defective Surgical Procedure: This could be resultant of improper sterilization of the surgical implements and implants
and also due to inappropriate location of the implant.
D556-TI 7
Dri
ve
rs
Factor
Occurrence of post operative
infections
Need for Biocompatibility
Technological advances in
surface kinetics and advanced
coating sectors
Availability of Funding
Enhanced in vivo functionality
Global Demand
Factor Description
Post-operative cochlear implant infections can be effectively controlled with proper medical
device coatings such as anti-microbial coatings. With appropriate treatment s and management
strategy of implant coatings, these infections can be negated.
Selection of the appropriate coating material enables a device to deliver the proper therapeutic
effect. For passive therapeutic coatings, such as polymeric hydrogels, the ability to covalently
bond a molecule to the surface of a device provides for a more durable hemo compatible
effect.
Technological advancements that define the development of modern medical implants is a multi-
stage design and technology specific manufacturing process that is primarily based on in-vitro
tests. Successful technological advances in the implant coating industry have made it one of the
strongest drivers.
With increase in global demand and technological advancements funding has become
inevitable for industry growth. Sponsorships and alliances from companies are increasing as
these companies are interested in funding and sponsoring various research trails.
Governmental bodies such as US NSF, European Commission and Dutch Ministry of
Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation have shown interest in funding for implant
coatings.
Market Impact of Drivers
Biocompatible materials are needed to minimize tissue rejection and promote the anchor of
implants to the targeted area. Biocompatibility is a major driver for present implant coating
modifications. Successful implant coatings have been devised which enhance biocompatibility
actively.
The ageing population in 2030 is projected to be twice as large as in 2000, growing from 35
million to 72 million in USA and representing nearly 20% of the total U.S. population
according to US governmental statistics. This tens in expected across all developed nations
and is expected to push the growth of implants and thereby, protective coatings.
1-3 years
Impact
4-6 years
Above 6 years
Key: Impact: High Medium Low
Protective Coatings for Medical Implants- Key Drivers, Global, 2014-2020
D556-TI 8
Factor
Increased cost of raw
materials
Lack of skilled
resources
Stringent regulations and
standards
Need for ecofriendly
coatings
Biodegradability of
coatings
Low durability and shelf
life
Factor Description
Expensive raw materials is a big challenge to this industry, especially for development of nano
coatings such as carbon nanotubes and bio active coatings.
Biodegradability is the recyclability of an implant. Some implant coatings such as Titanium
and other metal coatings are loosing degradability owing to corrosive nature in due course of
time. So scientists are working on this issue and developing anti-corrosive implant coatings
with long lasting effects.
Stringent regulations and coating safety procedures delay the efforts to commercialize .To bring
a biomedical implant to the market, manufacturers need to adhere to various regulations in terms
of manufacture, safety, and sustainability of the coating and its quality.
Coatings used in implants are mostly not environment friendly as these are either synthetic or
chemical based. Research is to focus on development of alternatives for chemical coatings
and use more of environment friendly green coatings, which would be safe for the host
tissues and also be effective in functioning.
Market Impact of Challenges
Given the rapid changes in implant technology and rehabilitative strategies, coating
professionals need quick access to a variety of training resources related to material properties
and behavior of coatings. These training needs should be considered and addressed by
professional associations and research institutes and more trained material science experts with
proper knowledge of surface activities and coating technologies are required.
Owing to high degradability of coating, the shelf life of the implant as a whole is drastically
reduced and the need for operation for the end user becomes frequent. This adversely affects
consumer confidence..Implants require coatings which are long lasting for better effectiveness
for greater period of time.
1-3 years
Impact
4-6 years
Above 6 years
Key: Impact: High Medium Low
Protective Coatings for Medical Implants- Key Challenges, Global, 2014-2020
Ch
all
en
ge
s
D556-TI 9
Interested in Full Access? Connect With Us
Ariel Brown Associate Corporate Communications
(210) 247-2481
Research Authors
Sanchari Chatterjee Research Analyst
Chemicals, Materials & Food
Vivek Ninkileri Research Analyst
Chemicals, Materials & Food
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/FrostandSullivan
LinkedIn Group https://www.linkedin.com/company/frost-&-sullivan
SlideShare http://www.slideshare.net/FrostandSullivan
Twitter https://twitter.com/Frost_Sullivan
Frost & Sullivan Events http://bit.ly/1lpWmeE
GIL Community http://visionary-it.gilcommunity.com/
D556-TI 10
Global Perspective 40+ Offices Monitoring for Opportunities and Challenges
D556-TI 11
Industry Convergence Comprehensive Industry Coverage Sparks Innovation Opportunities
Automotive &
Transportation
Aerospace & Defense Measurement & Instrumentation
Information & Communication Technologies
Healthcare Environment & Building Technologies
Energy & Power Systems
Chemicals, Materials & Food
Electronics & Security
Industrial Automation & Process Control
Automotive Transportation & Logistics
Consumer Technologies
Minerals & Mining