24
Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury:what should we count?

John LangleyMegan Davies

Page 2: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Background

• For public hospital discharges NZ has counted anything with an E code for the purposes of describing the injury problem!

Page 3: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

All public hospital discharges withE code: 1998 (n=105,862)

• Non injury diagnosis for the principal diagnosis accounts for 36% (n=38,434) of all E coded discharges.

• Of these 41% (n=15,735) did not have injury as secondary or subsequent diagnosis.

• Vast majority (80%) of 15,735 cases had E codes identifying iatrogenic factors (e.g. adverse effects of drugs)

Page 4: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

What is in the ICD Injury and Poisoning chapter?

• Fractures, Dislocations, Sprains/strains, internal injury, open wounds, injury to blood vessels, late effects of injury, superficial injury, contusions, crushings, effects of foreign bodies, burns, injury to nerves and spinal cord, traumatic complications, poisonings, toxic effects. (800-994).

• Certain adverse effects not elsewhere classified (995).

• Complications of surgical and medical care not elsewhere classified (996-999).

Page 5: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

One view of dealing with medical injury

• Conditions in the range 995-999 should be excluded from the definition of injury for most studies because they have different aetiology and means of prevention.

Page 6: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Response to that strategy

• Neither is sufficient grounds for exclusion.

• Besides which the argument does not stand close scrutiny:• aspects of aetiology may be the same! (needle

injury)• Prevention strategies may be different – but so

too are they for suicide compared with unintentional injury

• Rather the decision should be based on whether they meet the theoretical definition of injury.

Page 7: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Theoretical Definition of Injury

• Damage to the body produced by acute exposure to thermal, mechanical, electrical, or chemical energy, or the absence of such essentials as heat or oxygen.

• Damage due to some chronic low exposures (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome) is also included by some.

Page 8: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

996-999 Complications of surgical and medical care not elsewhere classified:

non-injury?

• 996.0 Mechanical complication of cardiac device, implant of and graft

• 997.1 Cardiac complications (e.g . Cardiac arrest during a procedure)

• 998.0 Postoperative infection

• 999.7 Generalized vaccinia

Page 9: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

996-999 Complications of surgical and medical care not elsewhere classified:

injury?

• 997.0 Central nervous system complications (e.g anoxic brain damage during procedure)

• 998.2 Accidental puncture or laceration during a procedure

• 998.4 Foreign body accidentally left during procedure

Page 10: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

• Excluding all medical injuries is the equivalent of “ throwing the baby out with the bathwater”

Page 11: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Significance of medical injuries for estimates of incidence and determining priorities: NZ experience: 1999 hospital

inpatients

• Traditional injury: (800-994): 40,924 83%

• Medical injury: (995-999): 8,167 17%

• All “injury”: (800-999): 49,091 100%

Page 12: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Hospital Discharge Data

• Availability • about 40 states

• Health Dept may not have access

• Comparability• types of hospitals reporting

• numbers of diagnostic fields

• data elements• E codes

• confidentiality

Page 13: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Hospital Discharge Data

• Quality• Completeness of hospitals reporting

• Ability to detect multiple hospitalizations for same injury

• Cross-border hospitalizations

• Other out-of-state hospitalizations (eg, in winter residents of FL or AZ)

Page 14: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Hospital Discharge Data

• Quality• Percentage of injury hospitalizations

with external cause coding• hospital

• diagnosis

• demographics

• season

• Accuracy of coding (external cause and nature of injury)

Page 15: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Hospital Discharge Data

• Ad hoc working group

• case definition for injury hospitalization

• calculating percentage of external

cause coding

• Injury Surveillance Workgroup 3

• Recommendations for the Use of HDD

for Injury Surveillance

Page 16: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury Hospitalization

Hospital

• Non-federal

• Acute-care

• Inpatient facility

Page 17: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury Hospitalization

Principal diagnosis injury

• Includes

• late effects

• re-admissions

• transfers

• deaths in hospital

• Excludes

• adverse effects of therapeutic drugs and

medical/surgical care and their late effects

Page 18: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury Hospitalization

Includes

800-909.2, 909.4, 909.9

910-994.9

995.5-995.59

995.80-995.85

Page 19: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury Hospitalization

Excludes

<800

909.3, 909.5

995.0-995.4, 995.6-995.7, 995.86,

995.89

996-999

Page 20: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injuries (?) outside the ICD injury and poisoning chapter

• 717 Internal derangement of knee

• 718 Other derangement of joint

• 724 Other and unspecified disorders of back

Page 21: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

If there is no discernible physical damage to the body why are we

counting the following as “injury”?

• Rape ?

• Foreign bodies ?

• Back pain?

None of these fit a commonly accepted theoretical definition of injury.

Page 22: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Theoretical Definition of Injury

• Damage to the body produced by acute exposure to thermal, mechanical, electrical,or chemical energy, or the absence of such essentials as heat or oxygen.

• Damage due to some chronic low exposures (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome) is also included by some.

Page 23: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Conclusion

1 We need to revisit our theoretical definition of injury.

2 Having done the above we need to reconsider our operational definition of injury (in terms of ICD diagnosis codes).

These issues will become increasingly important as we move to intra and inter country comparisons of non-fatal injury.

Page 24: Injury: what should we count? John Langley Megan Davies

Injury Prevention Research UnitInjury Prevention Research Unit

is supported by:is supported by: