Initial Data for Magnetized Stars in General Relativity Eric Hirschmann, BYU MG12, Paris, July 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1

Initial Data for Magnetized Stars in General Relativity Eric Hirschmann, BYU MG12, Paris, July 2009 Slide 2 Some background Interested in the evolution of binary systems of compact objects, e.g. NS-NS, NS-BH, BH- BH. sig recent progress on BH-BH more work needed on non-vacuum case Potentially sig. additional physics neutrinos, nuclear EOS, B, plasmas, rad hydro From NR side, been slow to incorporate many of these effects. Slide 3 introduction We have begun a program to incorporate additional physics into non-vacuum binaries. Evidence that presence of (strong) magnetic fields can affect gravitational wave signal. Slide 4 and motivation Drawback in our current simulations is use of seeded fields small magnetic field added below truncation error in constraints grows via MRI Works, but ad hoc Can it be improved? Also of interest to consider single, magnetized stars. GR models of magnetars Goal: Evolve/simulate more realistic models of magnetized NS singly and in binaries. Slide 5 Modeling magnetized stars Equilibrium (fluid) NS configurations in GR Much work done Includes stability studies and nonlinear evolution Much less done on magnetized NS in GR Bocquet et al (rigid rotation, poloidal) Cardall et al (static, poloidal) Kiuchi et al (rigid rotation, toroidal; axisymmetric evolution) Little or nothing (?) on convective motions in GR Slide 6 Analytic assumptions Our matter is a perfect fluid + E&M rest mass density internal energy density pressure fluid velocity Maxwell Ideal gas equation of state: Polytropic relation Relativistic Ohms law (MHD; connect fluid to E&M) Infinite conductivity (ideal MHD) Slide 7 Analytic assumptions Symmetries: axisymmetry stationarity Potentially yield an axisymmetric, magnetized, relativistic neutron star with convection and differential rotation Slide 8 Another assumption: hypersurface orthogonality? In general, must solve for most of metric. Hard simplify? Assume that 2D surfaces orthogonal to Killing vectors exist and can be extended (HO) Requires circularity flow fields follow lines of latitude only no convection either poloidal or toroidal B fields, but not both Pros: Calc spacetime means 4 metric components Cons: Strong (mathematical) restriction on physics; e.g. no convection, simple B fields, etc. Slide 9 Our approach: drop circularity Solve the full stationary, axisymmetric problem Assume same things as before (ideal MHD, polytropes, 2 KVs) Perform a Kaluza-Klein like decomposition Slide 10 The equations 3+2 Poisson-type eqns for the scalars 4 pairs of first order eqns for (conformal) 2-metric and 3 2-forms are independent of analytic: solvable via quadrature numerical: treat as ODEs / 1D integrations Slide 11 The equations (cont) Use a Greens function approach for elliptic eqns: Nonlinear integral equations, but iterate to convergence. Work in radial (compactified) and angular coords Allows exact BCs at infinity Based on self-consistent field approach of Hachisu, et al (1988) Slide 12 The equations (cont) Eqn of structure / eqn of (magneto-) hydrostatic equilibrium e.g., in absence of B-fields with B-fields, includes internal currents with ansatz, can solve exactly relates the physical, free data to the star and thermo props from it, we get the surface of the star Ideal MHD condition (Lorentz) (axisymmetry, stationary, MHD) constrains allowable physics in principle, all present with one constrained Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 Slide 16 Slide 17 Slide 18 Slide 19 Slide 20 Slide 21 Slide 22 Slide 23 Slide 24 Slide 25 Slide 26 Slide 27 Slide 28 Slide 29 Slide 30 Slide 31 Slide 32 Slide 33 Slide 34 Slide 35 Slide 36 Slide 37 Slide 38 Summary and future We can construct magnetized neutron stars with general magnetic field topology. Add differential rotation Add convection Evolve these singly Stability, growth and final mag of B GW emission and in binaries Other directions: More realistic equations of state; QED limit Accretion disks Slide 39 Slide 40 Analytic assumptions Our matter (stress tensor) is a perfect fluid + EM Rest mass density, internal energy density, pressure, fluid velocity, Maxwell Polytropic equation of state: Relativistic version of Ohms law to connect the fluid to the EM (MHD with displacement current: RMHD) Infinite conductivity (ideal MHD) Symmetries: axisymmetry and stationarity Potentially yield an axisymmetric, magnetized, relativistic neutron star with convection and differential rotation Slide 41 Related work Equilibrium, axisymmetric NS in GR have been studied since 1970s, but Rigid rotation, no convection Seldom include B fields (special) Hypersurface orthogonality (HO) Few stability studies One (formal) study relaxing HO yuck! Slide 42 Another assumption: hypersurface orthogonality? In general (for axisymmetric, stationary), must solve for most components of metric in two variables. This is hard can one simplify? Assume that 2D surfaces perpendicular to the symmetries exist and can be extended Turns out to require circularity flow fields follow lines of latitude only no convection either poloidal or toroidal B fields, but not both Pros: Calc of metric means only 4 components Cons: Strong (mathematical) restriction on physics; e.g. no convection, simple B fields, etc. Slide 43 Where it stands We have a formalism that will allow the computation of axisymmetric, equilibrium NS with magnetic fields (both poloidal and toroidal), convection and differential rotation. But we must still debug our code.