66
Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without permission from the world wide web. Do not copy or distribute.

Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes

WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without permission from the world wide web. Do not copy or distribute.

Page 2: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

California Earth Science Standard 1d:

Students know the evidence indicating that the planets are much closer to Earth than the stars are.

Page 3: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Earth = 8000 miles

wide

Page 4: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The space shuttle orbits from an altitude of 200 miles above the earth’s surface.

Page 5: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

200 miles may sound high up, but compared to the 8000 mile diameter of the earth, 200 miles is nothing.

Seen from this viewpoint, the space shuttle is barely off the ground!

Page 6: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Geosynchronous satellites, used widely for tv broadcasts and other communications applications, orbit at an average altitude of 22,300 miles.

Page 7: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The “space shuttle” was not designed to go to the moon, and it simply can’t make it there.

HOWEVER . . .

Page 8: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Apollo missions, powered by the Saturn V rocket shown here, DID make it to the moon several times in the 60’s & 70’s.

The “space shuttle” was not designed to go to the moon, and it simply can’t make it there.

HOWEVER . . .

Page 9: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Lunar rover

Lunar module

= “moon buggy”

“lem”

Page 10: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The average distance between the earth and its moon is about 240,000 miles

In this diagram, the earth and moon look far too large compared to the distance between them . . .

A more realistic picture would have them only this big:

The moon looks a little farther away that way, doesn’t it?

Page 11: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The average distance between the earth and the sun is about 93,000,000 miles

93,000,000 miles is also known as one “astronomical unit”.

93,000,000 miles = 1 AU

The sun is about 400 times as far from the earth as the moon is, but it’s 400 times wider than the moon, so they seem to be the same size to us.

Page 12: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Mars, the “red planet”, is the 4th planet from the sun.

Its orbit lies between those of Earth and Jupiter

Mars will probably be the first planet humans set foot on.

Page 13: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The distance from Earth to Mars varies from 36 to 250 million miles, depending on where the planets are in their orbits around the sun.

36,000,000 miles

250,000,000 miles

Mars

EarthSun

Page 14: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Neptune is the 8th true planet.

When astronomers downgraded Pluto from “planet” to “dwarf planet”, Neptune was, from then on, regarded as the farthest planet from the sun.

It’s farther from the sun than Uranus, but it weighs more.

Page 15: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Neptune is about 2,800,000,000 miles from the sun.

That’s 30 times as far as Earth’s 93,000,000.Neptune is 30 AU from the sun . . . and about that far from Earth, too.

Neptune

Earth

Sun

Earth’s orbit

Neptune’s orbit

Page 16: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Light travels 186,000 miles per second.

186,000 is a big number, but it’s not infinity.

Light takes time to travel.

Over short distances, it’s not noticeable, but over long distances, it makes a difference.

Light takes a little more than 8 minutes to travel the 93,000,000 miles from the sun to the earth.

In one year, light can travel 5,878,630,000,000 miles.

That distance, which is almost 6 trillion miles, is called . . . . . . a “light-year”

A light-year is about 6 trillion miles . . . of DISTANCE

Page 17: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Proxima Centauri, seen here in an x-ray photo taken from the Chandra X-ray observatory in outer space, is the second-closest star to the earth.

(The closest star to the earth is the sun.)

Proxima Centauri is 4.2 light-years from

Earth.

That’s about 24,000,000,000,000 miles

That’s about 15,000 AU

The closest star to the earth (besides the sun) is 500 times farther away from Earth than Neptune, the farthest planet

Page 18: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Milky Way Galaxy, in which our whole solar system is just a tiny speck, is 100,000 light years across.

The stars in our own galaxy are anywhere from 4 ly to just under 100,000 ly away from us. That’s FAR.

Page 19: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Milky Way Galaxy is just the galaxy we live in.

There are more than 100,000,000,000 galaxies in the observable universe.

One of the closest galaxies to the Milky Way is the Andromeda Galaxy, which is 2 million ly away.

Page 20: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 21: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

1d. Students know the evidence indicating that the planets are much closer to Earth than the stars are.

Page 22: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

*Planets move a lot more than stars do.

*When seen through a telescope, planets are round discs, not just points of light. In fact, with a telescope, you can see detailed surface features of planets, but not so with stars.

*The “parallax” method of determining distance shows stars to be farther than planets. (useful only for the nearer stars)

*Radar shows not only how far away planets are, but the change in frequency of the echoes tells us their motion, as well.

*We have successfully flown unmanned probes past all of the planets in the solar system, but we haven’t even come close to getting a probe to a star other than the sun.

Page 23: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

*Faraway stars are very dim, much dimmer than planets, especially than planets close to the earth like Venus.

*Planets pass in front of stars as they move through the sky, blocking them from view.

*Planets orbit our sun, but stars don’t. Planets are part of our local solar system, but stars are much farther away.

Page 24: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 25: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exihibit A: Planets move a lot more than stars do.

The stars rise in the east and sink in the west as the night goes by, but the pattern they form is pretty constant.

The most famous star patterns in the night sky have names. They are called “constellations”.

This is the first one I ever learned. It’s called the “big dipper”

It’s supposed to look like a big spoon or something.

Page 26: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

In the city, where I live, it’s hard to see constellations well at night because of the city lights, but I can usually see the three bright stars in Orion’s belt.

Page 27: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Here, a picture of Orion, a hunter from ancient Greek mythology, is superimposed over the constellation so you can see what the ancient Greeks imagined when they looked into the sky.

Page 28: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Perhaps the most discussed constellations are the twelve signs of the zodiac.

The stars in these patterns have moved a bit since the ancient Greeks named them, but the tradition continues.

Page 29: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The stars in the night sky mostly seem to remain in the same place relative to one another.

Page 30: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

From one night to the next, some of them seem to change position.

Page 31: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The ancient Greeks noticed these, and called them “planets” (or whatever the exactly Greek word is), which means “wanderers”.

Page 32: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Have you noticed the wandering star in these slides?

Page 33: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The wandering “star” is actually a planet.

Page 34: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The ancient Greeks couldn’t see all of the planets back then, but they did know about Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.

Back then, when people still thought the whole universe revolved around the earth, the sun and moon were considered to be planets, also.

Page 35: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

When you drive down a highway through the countryside, the asphalt on which you drive moves so fast past you that if you look straight down at it, it is a grey blur.

Fence posts along the side of the road whiz by pretty fast, too, but not as fast as the road surface beneath your tires.

If there are trees beyond the fence, they go by pretty fast too, but not as fast as the fence posts.

The mountains in the distance hardly seem to move at all.

If the moon is in the sky, it will seem to be totally motionless.

The farther away something is, the slower it SEEMS to be moving.

The fact that planets look like they’re moving faster than the stars in the sky is evidence that the planets are closer to us than the stars are.

Page 36: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 37: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exihibit B: When seen through a telescope, planets are round discs, not just points of light. In fact, with a telescope, you can see detailed surface features of planets, but not so with stars.

Is this picture of the star Proxima Centauri . . .

. . . nearly as detailed and clear as this picture of Jupiter?

Page 38: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 39: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exhibit C: The “parallax” method of determining distance shows stars to be farther than planets. (useful only for the nearer stars)

Earth

SunA

relatively nearby

star

Page 40: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exhibit C: The “parallax” method of determining distance shows stars to be farther than planets. (useful only for the nearer stars)

At one time of the year, a star may seem to be off in one direction . . .

Page 41: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exhibit C: The “parallax” method of determining distance shows stars to be farther than planets. (useful only for the nearer stars)

But six months later, when the earth is on the other side of the sun, the star will appear to be off in a different direction.

Page 42: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exhibit C: The “parallax” method of determining distance shows stars to be farther than planets. (useful only for the nearer stars)

If you know the diameter of the earth’s orbit, you can use the mathematical trick of “trigonometry” to calculate the distance to the star.

Page 43: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 44: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exhibit D: Radar shows not only how far away planets are, but the change in frequency of the echoes tells us their motion, as well.

This is the 250 foot-wide Mk1 radio telescope.

I’m not sure if it sent or received the signal or both, but it was definitely involved in the following . . .

Page 45: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

In 1957, the Mk1 radio telescope (or an associated device) sent a radio wave pulse to the planet Venus when it was at the point in its orbit when it was as close as it ever gets to Earth.

Page 46: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The radio wave pulse took 2 minutes to get to Venus and 2 minutes for its echo to travel back to Earth.

Knowing that light travels 186,000 miles per second, astronomers were able to calculate that Venus was 41 million miles from Earth at this point in its orbit.

Page 47: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 48: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Exhibit E: We have successfully flown unmanned probes to all of the “true” planets in the solar system, but we haven’t even come close to getting a probe to a star other than the sun.

Mariner 9 reached Mars in 1971. It took some pictures and sent them back using coded radio signals.

Page 49: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Cassini-Huygens probe was launched in 1997.

Page 50: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Cassini-Huygens probe took several months to fly past Jupiter, but it reached its closest point in 2000.

It took some very detailed pictures and made lots of measurements.

Page 51: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Cassini-Huygens probe entered orbit around Saturn in 2004. It was the first man-made object to orbit Saturn.

Page 52: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Cassini-Huygens probe discovered three previously unknown moons of Saturn in 2004 when it got there.

Can you see the tiny moon buried between some of Saturn’s rings?

Page 53: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Voyager 1 & 2 probes that we launched in 1977 were primarily designed to fly by Jupiter and Saturn.

Page 54: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

In 1979, Voyager 1 took this picture of Jupiter, featuring its great red spot.

Page 55: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The Voyager 1 probe is currently the farthest-away man-made object ever. It is 10 billion miles from the sun (108.6 AU).

Voyager 1 is currently traveling at a speed of 38,400 miles per hour.

Voyager 1 is expected to reach the “heliopause”, the extreme outer limit of our solar system, and enter interstellar space, in 2015.Therefore, our farthest probe, Voyager 1, isn’t even out of the solar system yet as of this writing (4/29/2009). If it ever makes it to another star system, it will be a long, long time . . .

Page 56: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 57: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without
Page 58: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The planet Jupiter is HUGE.

Page 59: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The planet Jupiter is HUGE.

In fact, its mass is 2.5 times as much as the rest of the planets combined.

However, it would need to be 10 times more massive in order for NUCLEAR FUSION to happen in its core.

If Jupiter were 10 times more massive than it is, the pressure inside would be so great that it could smash hydrogen atoms together hard enough to make them combine.

Page 60: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The planet Jupiter is huge.

The sun, however . . .

Jupiter is much bigger than the earth.

. . . is GIGANTIC

Page 61: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

The sun IS big enough to have NUCLEAR FUSION happen in its core.

That’s why the sun is a star, and not a planet.

When four hydrogen atoms combine to form one helium atom*, this process, NUCLEAR FUSION, converts a small amount of matter into a whole lot of energy.*It’s not exactly that simple, but the net result is four hydrogen atoms becoming one helium atom.

NUCLEAR FUSION, by turning matter into energy, makes a star very, very hot – so hot that it shines.

e = mc2

Page 62: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

U-236Ba-142U-235Kr-91

Page 63: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

Protons don’t like other protons.Positives don’t like positives.

The closer two charged particles get, the stronger the force between them.

Remember how small a nucleus is compared to the atom as a whole?

In a nucleus, protons are VERY close together.

Protons close enough to join and form one nucleus will repel each other with extreme force.

To get protons to get close enough to fuse together, you need to overpower this electrostatic repulsion.

Extreme heat and/or extreme pressure, both of which are found in the centers of stars, can make fusion happen.

Page 64: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

If protons are smashed together by exterme heat and/or pressure, they will get close enough for something magical to happen . . .

The “strong force” turns on.

The strong force has a strength of zero until protons get VERY close together, and then it gets VERY strong, very suddenly.

(The “strong force” is sometimes called the “strong nuclear force”.)

The strong force is so powerful, that it overpowers the electrostatic repulsion the protons feel for each other . . .

. . . and it “glues” them together.

Page 65: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without

U-236Ba-142U-235Kr-91

H

H

H

H

He

Page 66: Init 4/24/2009 by Daniel R. Barnes WARNING: This presentation includes both graphical elements created by the author and graphical elements taken without