Upload
valerie-lamb
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC DelegationStructural instruments
-Regulatory Contextin Brief Overview
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Objectives for Community Support of Regional Policy
• Objective 1: For NUTS II regions whose per capita GDP (in PPP) is lower than 75% of EU average (94/96 data)
• Objective 2: For areas affected by socio-economic restructuring
• Objective 3: For regions not covered by Objective 1 - to support all human resources actions across a Member State
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Objective 1
• List of eligible regions decided by the European Commission
• 22% of EU population• 69.7% of the funds (136 billion EURO)• Outermost and ex-Objective 6 regions
included as Objective 1 regions• Transitional period of 6 or 7 years for
areas losing eligibility • Objective 1 funds also for PEACE and
Swedish coast programmes
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Objective 2
• Total coverage = 18% of EU population
• 11,6% of the funds (22,5 billion EURO)
• Indicative coverage of 4 strands at EU level:- industrial and service areas (10%)- rural areas (5%) -urban areas (2%)- fisheries-dependent areas (1%)
• Transitional period of 6 years for areas losing eligibility
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Objective 3
• 12.3% of the funds (24 billion EURO)
• Adapting and modernising systems of education, training and employment:
- accompanying economic and social changes
- lifelong education and training systems
- active labour market policies to fight unemployment
- promoting social inclusion and equal opportunities
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Structural Instruments
• European Regional Development Fund
• European Social Fund
• European Agriculture Guarantee and Guidance Fond (EAGGF)
• Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
• Cohesion Fund
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
European Regional Development Fund
Mission: “to redress regional imbalances in
Community”“to promote stable and sustainable
development”Fields of intervention:• productive investment to create and/or
safeguard permanent jobs• infrastructure• endogenous potential
- local development- SMEs
• technical assistance
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
European Social Fund
Mission: “human resource development and employment”
Fields of intervention:• Support for multi-annual National Action
Plans- active labour market policies to
promote integration- social inclusion/ equal opportunities- lifelong learning systems- training for innovation and adaptability- improved participation of women
• Local development and Territorial Employment Pacts
• Information society
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
European Agriculture Guarantee and Guidance Fund (EAGGF)
Mission: “support CAP, rural development and improvement of agricultural structures”
Fields of intervention:• ‘Accompanying’ measures
-early retirement-agri-environment-forestry-less-favoured areas-Other measures -restructuring of farms-setting up of young farmers-training-processing and marketing
• Rural development measures
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
Mission: “balanced resource management and competitive structures”
Fields of intervention:
• Measures to ensure a sustainable balance to supply and demand
• Strengthening competitiveness
• Processing and marketing
• Revitalisation of fisheries areas
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Cohesion Fund
• Mission: support for improvement of transport infrastructure and environment
• Eligibility criteria:- for countries with a GNP/inhabitant
lower than 90% of the EU average- for projects in transport and
environment fields
• Annual budget: 2,615 billion EURO per year
• Review of eligibility in 2003
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Planning and use of funding instruments (1)
Objective 1Objective 1
• 1 CSF, with 1 OP per region (or SPD if < 1 billion EURO)
• funded by the ERDF, ESF, EAGGF-Guidance, FIFG
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Planning and use of funding instruments (2)
Objective 2Objective 2• 1 SPD per region (NUTS II level)• funded by the ERDF, ESF (EAGGF-Guarantee)
Objective 3Objective 3• 1 SPD per country• funded by the ESF
Community Initiatives:Community Initiatives: one Fund per Initiative
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Partnership arrangements (1)A more decentralised cohesion policy
• Within the Member States:Within the Member States:widening and deepening definition of widening and deepening definition of the partnershipthe partnershipregional and local authorities and
other competent authorities• economic and social partners• other competent bodies including NGOs, environmental sector etc.• active involvement of partners in all stages of programming
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Partnership arrangements (2)A more decentralised cohesion policy
• Between the Commission Between the Commission and the Member Statesand the Member States
• a clear definition of responsibilities with three key players
- the Commission
- the programme Management Authority
- the Monitoring Committee
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Programming: 4 main steps1. Programme guidance issued by the
Commission
2. Development plans submitted by Member States after consultation with partners
3. Adoption of strategy by the Commission:- quantified strategic targets- priorities- funding allocations
4. Detailed programming of measures by Management Authority and Monitoring Committees
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Planning and programming timetable
• Plans and programmes to cover 7 years (except of transition areas)
• Plans submitted by Member States within 4 months after list of eligible regions is concluded
• Commission decision within 5 months of receiving plans: CSF or SPD
• Commission decision within 5 months of receiving proposed OPs
• Member States to submit Programme Complement within 3 months of approval of SPD or OP
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Requirements on plans and programmes
• Regional Developments Plans:- reinforced ex- ante evaluation
• CSF, SPDs:
- strategic priorities, financial allocations a. methods of implementation
• SPDs and OPs will no longer contain measures, as they did before
• Programme Complement: measures, finance by measure, beneficiaries, publicity actions
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Programming: who does what? (1)
Commission:• determines eligible regions and
indicative financial allocations
• establishes programme guidance
• adopts (modifies) programmes only at the level of strategic priorities
• monitories at strategic level
• approves large-scale projects (>EURO 50 million)
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Programming: who does what? (2)
Member State-Managing Authority:• prepares plans
• prepares and adopts the programming complement
• sub-delegates responsibilities as necessary - global grants
• selects projects
• prepares annual report
• implements the mid-term evaluation
• ensures that information and publicity rules are adhered to
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Programming: who does what? (3)
Member State - Monitoring Committee
• agrees on Programming complement
• lays down project selection criteria
• monitors programme implementation:
- proposes programme changes to Management Authority
- agrees on proposals to change Programming complement
• approves mid-term evaluation
• agrees Annual report
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Principle of Additionality
• ”The Funds may not replace public or other equivalent structural expenditure by the Member State”
• Three verifications: ex-ante, mid-term, ex-post
• measured against structural expenditures in all Objective 1 regions (for Objective 1)...
• ...or expenditures on active labour market policies outside Objective 1 regions (for Objectives 2 and 3)
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Ceilings on co-financing rates
• calculated at measure level
• general conditions unchanged
• new ceilings where substantial revenue generated from infrastructure:
- Objective 1: 40% + 10% for Cohesion Fund states
- Objective 2: 25%
- can be 10% higher if not direct grants
• and where investment in firms:
- Objective 1: 35%
- Objective 2: 15%
- can be 10% higher for SMEs if not direct grants
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Monitoring arrangements:A more transparent implementation
• Key annual meetings encounter:
- Commission and Management Authority for management questions
- Commission and control authorities for control questions
• Monitoring of targets for quantified indicators
• Mid-term review of implementation
• Improved information and publicity system
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Evaluation: a tool for better programming
• ex-ante evaluation submitted by Member State with plans; new emphasis on
- employment situation
- environmental impact
- equality between men and women
• mid-term evaluation implemented by Managing authority using an independent expert: consequences for reprogramming
• ex-post evaluation implemented by European Commission by 2009
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Financial ManagementCombining simplification and efficiency
• Automatic annual commitments
• Automatic de-commitment of unused resources
• Payment on account of 7% on the adoption of the programme
• New system of reimbursements against expenditure incurred
• Final payment of 5% at closure of programme
• Flat-rate indexation of 2% built into budget with review for 2004-2006
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Financial ControlA clearer division of responsibilities
• Member States are responsible for:
- efficient systems for financial control
- prevention of irregularities
- correction of irregularities
- ensuring compliance with Community law
• Commission is responsible for:
- checks on efficiency of financial control systems
- consequences: possible suspension or cancellation of payments
- organisation of annual meetings
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
The performance reserveA new tool to encourage improved
performance• 4% of national resources allocated before
31.3.2004• Assessment of programme performance
based on:- realisation of aims decided ex-ante- the quality of the programme
management- the absorption of EU resources and their
leverage effect- choice of indicators by Member State,
based on proposals by Commission• Member State proposes successful
programmes • Allocation of Funds by the Commission
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Closing ongoing programmes
• Programmes before 1994
- requests for payments until 31.3.2001
-automatic decommitments until 30.9.2001
• Programmes from period 1994-1999:
- requests for payments until 31.3.2003
-automatic decommitments until 30.9.2003
InformationOverview
SF: RegulatoryContext
Patrick Colgan,Ján Krištín
Workshops for
EC Delegation
Commission implementing decisions
• Eligibility of expenditure (article 30)
• Use of the EURO (article 33)
• Financial control (article 38)
• Financial corrections (article 39)
• Information and Publicity (article 46)
• ….others if necessary