13
© ASTM International Seoul South Korea Industry Workshop Break-Out Building Construction 21 October 2014

Industry Break-Out Building Construction Seoul© ASTM International Seoul South Korea Industry Workshop Break-Out Building Construction 21 October 2014

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • © ASTM International

    Seoul

    South Korea

    Industry

    Workshop

    Break-Out

    Building

    Construction

    21 October

    2014

  • © ASTM International

    Sustainable Construction Case Study: Copper and the Phoenix

    Health Sciences Education Building Seoul, South Korea, 21 October 2014

    Andy Kireta Jr.

    Vice President

    Copper Development Association Inc

    www.astm.org

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 3

    North American “Green Building” Landscape

    USGBC

    LEED® Green

    Globes Living

    Building

    Challenge NAHB

    National

    Green

    Building

    Standard International

    Green

    Construction

    Code

    Energy Star

    Water Sense

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 4

    “Green Building” Goals

    Established by prescription

    Rating schemes that award “points” based on building inputs, technologies

    Score sheet approach

    i.e. LEED for New Construction v2009

    Points for inputs and design considerations in 7 areas

    Established by performance

    Heavily focused on life-cycle analysis of

    buildings as holistic systems

    i.e. LEED v4 (released in 2014)

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 5

    “Green Building” v. Sustainable Construction

    Facts instead of Claims

    “Green Building” has devolved into a

    pursuit of points, marketing claims and

    rating schemes that have lost sight of

    the goal of sustainable construction –

    buildings that:

    last longer,

    operate more efficiently,

    with less input,

    and less environmental impact

    during the building’s construction and

    throughout its lifetime.

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 6

    Why?

    Sustainable Buildings offer benefits

    Environmental benefits

    Less energy usage/renewable energy usage

    Lower CO2 emissions

    Less water usage/better water maintenance

    Lower impact

    Financial benefits

    Lower rents/higher occupancy

    Tax benefits

    Increased resale value

    Social benefits

    Health gains

    Productivity improvement

    Reputational benefits

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 7

    Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 8

    Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Energy & Atmosphere

    Embed Kireta Clip 1

    here; start on click

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/14fc0u0ub7brv

    om/Kireta%20Clip%201.mp4?dl=0

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 9

    Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Innovation in Design

    Embed Kireta Clip 2

    here; start on click

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/g97az04o1u1y

    tnf/Kireta%20Clip%202.mp4?dl=0

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 10

    Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Materials & Resources

    Embed Kireta Clip 3

    here: start on click

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/yh7rawkwt99d

    hvs/Kireta%20Clip%203.mp4?dl=0

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 11

    Materials Content Driven by Standards

    Copper Sheet

    ASTM B370

    Ice & Water

    Shield

    ASTM D1970,

    D3767, D412,

    D903, E96, D46,

    E108

    Aluminum Z-purlins

    ASTM B308

    Mineral Wool Rigid

    Insulation Board

    ASTM C726

  • © ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 12

    Environmental Performance Claims driven by Standards

    Page 8 of 11

    Copper sheet and strip for building construction

    According to ISO 14025

    Life Cycle Assessment: Results

    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

    CML 2001 (Nov 2010)

    Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits

    Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D

    GWP kg CO2 eq 3.24E+00 2.08E-03 -2.54E-01

    ODP kg CFC-11 eq 3.85E-08 1.61E-12 -6.52E-09

    AP kg SO2 eq 3.93E-02 1.28E-05 -6.43E-03

    EP kg PO43-

    eq 1.13E-03 1.75E-06 -1.12E-04

    POCP kg C2H4 eq 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.67E+00

    ADPE kg Sb eq 1.56E-04 7.52E-10 -2.24E-05

    ADPF MJ 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.67E+00

    TRACI 2.1 Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits

    Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D

    GWP kg CO2 eq 3.24E+00 2.08E-03 -2.54E-01

    ODP kg CFC-11 eq 4.21E-08 1.71E-12 -7.15E-09

    AP kg SO2 eq 3.50E-02 1.39E-05 -5.58E-03

    EP kg N eq 5.79E-04 1.21E-06 -5.98E-05

    SP kg O3 eq 1.92E-01 2.85E-04 -1.86E-02

    RESOURCE USE Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits

    Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D

    PERE [MJ] 2.87E+00 2.18E-03 -3.50E-01

    PERM [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    PERT [MJ] 2.87E+00 2.18E-03 -3.50E-01

    PENRE [MJ] 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.68E+00

    PENRM [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    PENRT [MJ] 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.68E+00

    SM [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    RSF [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    NRSF [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    FW [m³] 2.18E+00 -5.52E-02 3.98E-01

    OUTPUT FLOWS AND WASTE CATEGORIES Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits

    Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D

    HWD [kg] 4.20E-02 0.00E+00 -9.02E-03

    NHWD [kg] 9.32E+01 1.55E-01 -1.99E+01

    RWD [kg] 1.35E-03 5.20E-07 -6.41E-05

    CRU [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    MFR [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.00E-02

    MER [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    EEE [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    EET [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

    Glossary

    Environmental Impacts

    GWP Global warming potential

    ODP Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer

    AP Acidification potential of land and water

    EP Eutrophication potential

    POCP Formation potential of tropospheric ozone photochemical

    oxidants

    ADPE Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources

    ADPF Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources

    FF Fossil fuel consumption

    Resource Use

    PERE Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable

    primary energy resources used as raw materials

    PERM Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw

    materials

    PERT Total use of renewable primary energy resources

    PENRE Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw

    materials

    PENRM Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials

    PENRT Total use of non-renewable primary energy resources

    SM Use of secondary material

    RSF Use of renewable secondary fuels

    NRSF Use of non-renewable secondary fuels

    FW Use of net fresh water

    Output Flows and Waste Categories

    HWD Hazardous waste disposed

    NHWD Non-hazardous waste disposed

    RWD Radioactive waste disposed

    CRU Components for re-use

    MFR Materials for recycling

    MER Materials for energy recovery

    EE Exported energy per energy carrier

    Page 9 of 11

    Copper sheet and strip for building construction

    According to ISO 14025

    Life Cycle Assessment: Interpretation

    For almost all assessed impact categories, the use of primary copper has the greatest contribution to the overall

    impact. However, the recycling of copper sheet at the end of life has the potential to recover a large proportion of this impact.

    The use of fossil energy sources has a strong correlation with the GWP. These categories therefore have a similar profile.

    Impact Assessment Method: TRACI 2.1

    Impact Category Impact Units

    Global warming potential 2.99E+00 kg CO2 eq

    Acidification potential 2.94E-02 kg SO2 eq

    Eutrophication potential 5.20E-04 kg N eq

    Ozone depletion potential 3.50E-08 kg CFC-11 eq

    Smog potential 1.74E-01 kg O3 eq

    Impact Assessment Method: CML 2001 – Nov 2010

    Impact Category Impact Units

    Global warming potential 2.99E+00 kg CO2 eq

    Acidification potential 3.29E-02 kg SO2 eq

    Eutrophication potential 1.02E-03 kg PO43-

    eq

    Ozone depletion potential 3.20E-08 kg CFC-11 eq

    Photochemical ozone creation potential 3.59E-04

    kg C2H4 eq

    -20%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    AP

    EP

    GWP

    ODP

    SP

    ADP(elem

    )

    ADP(fossil)

    AP

    EP

    GWP

    ODP

    POCP

    Rela

    veIm

    pact

    D

    C4

    A1-A3

    TRACI2.1 CML2001-Nov2010

  • © ASTM International

    Thank you

    www.astm.org