Indirect Model Study

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    1/7

    educational section

    INDIRECT METHODS OF

    STRUCTURAL MODEL ANALYSIS

    bY

    J.

    D.

    DAVIES

    University Co llege, Swansea

    This article gives in two parts an elementary intro-

    duction to the indirect methods widely used in

    structural engineering and applicable also in other

    fields. The first part introduces the basic theorems,

    the second part in the next issue of Strain will dea l with

    the laws of similitude, with model ma terials and with

    experimental techniques.

    1 Synopsis

    Thepaper reviews ffietheory, methods and materials

    used for indirect models for structures having linear

    force-deformation characteristics. The main purpose

    of these models is the dete rmin ation of influence lines

    and influence surfaces for the generalised forces (axial

    and shear forces, bending mom ents and torques) and

    generalised displacements (axial and lateral move-

    ments, rotations and twists) in prototype structures.

    Unlike direct model methods, this method does

    not have the actual loading on the structure re-

    produced to scale, and this exp lains the term indirect.

    Prototype quantities are ob tained from measurements

    on the model in terms of the laws of structural simili-

    tude. The assumption of linear behav iour considerably

    simplifies the similarity requirements. A wide range

    of

    materials may be used for constructing the models,

    the experimental techniques are com paratively simple

    to p erform and expensive equipm ent is not required.

    2. Introduction

    Indirect models are used to determine influence lines

    and influence surfaces for structures exhibiting linear

    elastic behaviou r, i.e. structures in which the deforma -

    tions are directly proportional to the loads. An

    influence line is a graph giving the variation of some

    linear response of the structure (force, moment, de-

    flection or rotation) at a particular point as a unit

    load (force or couple) moves along the structure. If

    the unit load can mov e in two planes-as in shell

    type structures-the influence line becomes an in-

    fluence surface.

    It is assumed that the principle of superposition

    (see below) is valid for model an d full-size prototy pe.

    The theory of indirect models is straightforward and

    the testing procedures a re com paratively simple.

    If influence characteristics are required for

    genera-

    lised forces

    (axial forces, shear forces, moments and

    torques) at particular sections, the procedure is to

    cut the model at one of these sections, induce a

    prescribed displacement, and interpret the results in

    accordance with Muller-Breslaus principle. (See

    Section 4.)

    When influence characteristics are required for

    generalised deformations

    (deflections o r rotations) t he

    model is deformed by a prescribed force and the results

    are interpreted by recourse to the rec iprocal theorem.

    (See Section 3.

    Thus, for the first method the cutting and dis-

    placing of the model requires suitable apparatus but

    only deformations are measured. For the second

    method the procedu re is simpler but the magnitude of

    the force causing deformations has to be measured

    also.

    Indirect models are used for static or quasi-static

    problems only.

    3.

    Linear Structural Behaviour

    A large number of common civil engineering

    structures remain stiff under load and the deforma-

    tions are such that they do not m easureably affect th e

    actions of the loads. Fo r o verall linear structural be-

    haviour three conditions have to be fulfilled :

    (i) The stress-strain relationships must be linear

    (Hook es Law applies).

    (ii) There are no cable o r stab ility effects, i.e., th e

    deformations do not modify the stiffness of the

    structure due to second order effects resulting

    from axial tension o r com pression forces.

    (iii) Th e deforma tions are small (no gross changes in

    geometry under load)

    These three requirem ents must be born e in mind in

    the selection of suitable model m aterials, testing techni-

    ques an d interpretation of results. Occasionally, it may

    be

    expedient to contravene requirement (iii) when it

    is

    more convenient to use large displacements if

    precise measuring equipment is not to hand. The

    page thirty-six Strain, October,

    968

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    2/7

    consequences of non-compliance with strict linear

    elastic behav iour will be discussed in la ter sections.

    Principle of superposition

    The principle of superposition of forces and dis-

    placements due to different loading systems by simple

    algebraic summation is valid

    if

    the structure exhibits

    linear behaviour. This principle, together with the re-

    ciprocal theorem, forms the basis of all indirect

    model analysis.

    With regard to displacement, the required com-

    ponent of the d isplacement at a po int is the projection

    of

    the actual deflection of the point on to the line of

    action

    of

    the force acting at that poin t, i.e., the de-

    flection affecting the work don e by the force (Fig. I.

    P

    Fig.

    I .

    The required component of the deflection is6,

    namely the displacement affecting the work done

    by P.

    Influence coeflcients

    The deflection

    61

    t some point 1 due to a load

    P2

    acting at some point 2 may be expressed in the form

    61 = a12

    p2

    where

    a12

    is called the influence coefficient (or flexi-

    bility coefficient) and represents th e change in deflec-

    tion at

    1

    due to a change of unit load at 2.

    Fig. 2 shows the load-deflection relationship for

    a

    point

    1

    on a linear structure subjected to a mon otonic

    force system in which all the forces increase uniformly

    at the same relative intensity.

    Using influence coefficients, the deflection a t I may

    be expressed as

    I i 3

    JI

    Fig. 2. Monotonic forc e system.

    Because the system is monotonic, the load ratios

    Pz/Pl,

    etc., are constant and all loads may be repre-

    sented by

    a

    single load parameter, in this case

    PI.

    If the forces applied to the structure d o no t increase

    in a constant ratio one to the

    other

    but in some arbit-

    rary

    way,

    the load-deflection relationship at a point

    will not be

    a

    straight line and some possible paths are

    shown in Fig.

    3.

    Fig. 3. Possible load-deflection path s f o r a non-mono-

    tonic for ce system.

    However, irrespective of the loading pa th the total

    net work done by the system of forces will be

    1

    8 - P 62

    3)

    When all the forces in the system have reached their

    final values, the value of 61 will be the same irrespective

    of the loading history, and the work done by P1 is

    represented by the area of the hatched portion of

    Fig. 3, always assuming linear behaviour throughou t.

    The reciprocal theorem

    1

    a n d 2 .

    Fig. 4a may represent a linear structure loaded at

    Strain, October, 1968

    page thirty-seveii

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    3/7

    51

    b

    C

    Fig.

    4 .

    The reciprocal theorem:

    a12

    =

    a21

    61 = al l PI

    a12

    PZ

    6 =

    a21 Pl a22 PZ

    The total work done is

    and is independent of the loading path.

    Apply P1first and then apply Pz.The load-deflection

    curves for 1 and 2 are shown in Figs. 4b and c. The

    total w ork done for this sequence of loading is

    ,z- P 6 = all

    P

    a12 P1 p2

    Equating (4) and 5 ) we find

    which is one form of the reciprocal theorem.

    1 1

    1 5 )

    2

    2

    a22 Pi

    a12 = a21 (6)

    -T

    Fig. 5 . Bettis law: The work done by P1 in moving

    through the displacement 61 caused by M2 equals

    the work done by M2 in moving through the

    displacement 02 caused by

    PI.

    Hence

    Hence PI 61 = PlalzMz = M2e2 = M2a21P1.

    ~

    Consider the simple structure shown in Fig. 5. We

    first apply a load

    P1

    to point

    1

    and this will cause a

    rotation e2=aZ1P1 t point 2. Remove

    P1

    and apply

    a coup le M2 at point

    2.

    This will c ause a displacem ent

    61=a 2 at point 1. Hence

    a12=61/M2 and

    a21

    = /P1

    Since

    a12=a21,

    it follows that

    Pi

    61 =M2 ( 6 4

    Let us next consider two separate groups of

    generalised loads: let PI represent the first group and

    M

    he second group. As before, we apply the system

    of loads PI and then the system MII. Let QII be the

    displacements caused by

    PI

    along the lines of action

    of MI nd let

    6 be

    the d isplacements caused by MI,

    along the lines of action of PI. The appropriate dis-

    placements are those affecting the work done by each

    component of the load groups-deflections for loads

    and rotations for couples.

    If

    PI=P1 + PI/ +P1 . MI, =M2+M2/ +M2// .

    s,

    = 1/

    s2// . = 2

    2/

    p ..

    then com bining the work don e by each force compo-

    nent we obta in in accordance with (6a)

    (PI 61 +PI / 611 +PI/ 61// .

    or

    =(W +M2/e2/ +M2/82//

    .

    )

    ZP161= ZM202 (6b)

    This is known as Bettis Law and is simply a more

    general form of the reciprocal theorem using the work

    done by the two force systems. Thus if we expand

    equation (6a) we get

    P161=PI x a12 x M2=M2 x a21x P1=M2 , etc.

    or in general,

    1 61 = Z P2 62 for forces and deflections

    Z M1 81 = Z

    M2

    e2for couplesand rotations (7)

    Equations

    (7)

    represent the basis of influence line

    theory. The displacement is considered positive if it

    correspond s to the sense of the force.

    1 61 =

    M2

    02 for mixed quantities 1

    4.

    Influence Line fo r Forces

    Fig. 6a shows a model of a two-hinged arch.

    Suppose it is required

    to

    find the influence line for the

    horizontal thrust at the hinges. The restraint cor-

    responding to the reactive force

    H

    is removed by

    controlled cutting of the arch at point 1

    ;

    t may be

    imagined that the left-hand hinge is supported on

    rollers permitting horizontal movements only (it is

    page thirty-eighi

    Strain , October, 968

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    4/7

    important to note that indiscriminate cutting is not

    permitted; only the restraint impeding motion of the

    force under consideration along its line of action is

    to be removed). The resulting structure is called a

    primary structure (Fig. 6b) and is derived from the

    original structure by removal of one restraint. All

    subsequent operations are performed on the primary

    structure.

    / p

    b

    /

    c

    d

    Fig.

    6 .

    Mueller-Breslausprinciple: Diagram

    c

    shaded

    area) gives the influence line for the horizontal

    thrust H at the hinge

    1.

    The deflection

    6

    is considered positive if the

    point

    2

    moves in a sense opposite to that of the

    applied load.

    a Original structure.

    b Primary structure.

    c Deformation of the primary structure due

    to

    displacement at

    1

    The ordinates of the

    hatchedarea represent the influence line o r H .

    d Deformation of the primary structure due to

    a load P at

    2

    causing a deflection A at

    1

    H = 6 / A ) . P

    Strain, October,

    968

    Two separate loading groups are now applied to

    the primary structure and attention will be focussed

    on the displacements at 1 and along an arbitrarily

    chosen direction at an arbitrarily chosen point 2.

    The primary structure is deformed by introducing

    a small displacement at

    1

    along the line

    of

    action

    of the reactive force H and the structure takes up the

    shape indicated by the broken line. (Fig.

    6c .

    The

    deflection at 2 is

    6

    = a21 H

    = all

    H

    and that at 1 is

    giving

    Remove the displacing force at

    1

    and let the primary

    structure deform under a load

    P

    Fig. 6d) applied at

    2

    causing a movement of equal magnitudein at 1. Then

    equating the expressions for weifind

    so

    that with equation

    8)

    and with

    a12

    = a21 from (6)

    A = a12 P

    all H = a12 P

    H 12

    -

    21

    6

    p - a l l - -n

    giving

    (9)

    6

    n

    = - P

    Since point 2 was arbitrarily chosen, it will be seen

    that 6/A represent the shape and scale

    of

    the in-

    fluence line for H due to a unit load P = l placed any-

    where on the structure. Thus the hatched area in

    Fig. 3c represents directly the influence line required.

    This is the basis of Mueller-Breslaus principle

    which may be stated as follows:-

    For any linear elastic structure, if the restraint

    corresponding to an internal or external force or

    moment is removed and

    a

    corresponding trans-

    lational or rotational displacement is introduced, the

    deflected shape of the structure serves as an influence

    line for the generalised force considered.

    If the structure is statically determinate, it does not

    have to be elastic for this principle to be valid.

    Only the prescribed displacement

    A

    and the de-

    formed shape of the structure are required; the

    forces do not have to be measured. If the primary

    structure is deformed by a prescribed displacement

    acting in the assumed positive sense of the force under

    page thirty-nine

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    5/7

    consideration, the ordinates of the influence line will

    be positive if they are movements opposite to the

    sense of the applied loads.

    If and P are equal to unity, 6 represents the

    magn itude as well a s the shape of the influence line.

    When Figs. 6 (c) and (d) are combined by the

    principle of superposition, we return to the original

    structure with a load

    P

    a t 2. If the applied load is a

    couple, then

    10)

    where 0 is the rotation of the primary structure

    at

    the

    point of application of M due to the displacement A.

    Instead of measuring directly the component 6 of

    the deflection along an arbitrary line of action it

    is

    sometimesmore: convenient t o measure the components

    with respect to rectangular co-ord inate axes.

    8

    n

    = - M

    Nature of the cuts and displacem ents

    The type of cut depend s on the particular quantity

    to be determined : for axial forces the cut m ust permit

    relative movements along the longitudinal a x i s of a

    mem ber, for shear forces relative movements perpen-

    dicular to the long itudinal axis, for bending mom ents

    relative rotations about the point (a hinge), i.e., the

    cut removes one restraint corresponding

    to

    the

    quantity for which the influence line is required. Th e

    induced displacement at the cut section must be such

    that it only affects the work done by the quantity

    under consideration. For example, when

    a

    hinge is

    8

    C

    W

    iiiuenck lines fo r internal reactive forces

    a Original structure

    b Influence line for the axial force at 1:

    F =

    6 / A ) P

    Influence line for the shear force at 1:

    S = 6 / A ) P

    d Influence line f o r the bending moment at 1:

    M

    =

    6 / a ) P

    inserted and the primary structure deformed to find

    the influence line for bending mom ent, there must be

    no

    relative axial o r shear displacem ents affecting the

    net work don e by the axial and shear forces acting on

    the section. There may be actua l movements provided

    the work done by the eq ual a nd opposite forces is

    algebraically zero.

    The three possible types of displacements used in

    planar frameworks are shown in Fig.

    7.

    These are

    used to find the influence lines for the internal reactive

    forces. For external reactive forces the displacem ents

    depend on the nature of the support. Fig.

    8

    shows the

    displacements appropriate to

    a

    clamped edge. If the

    supports provide elastic restraint they can contribute

    to the total work done when a displacemen t is intro-

    duced, an d som e examples are indicated in Fig. 9.

    5.

    Influence Lines fo r Deformations

    In this method it is not necessary to introduc e a cut

    to form a primary structure: the deformations are

    Strain, October,

    968

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    6/7

    M a

    H

    b c d

    Fig.

    8.

    Types of displacement required to obtain the

    influence lines fo r external reactive force s at a

    clamped support.

    a

    Member with clamped support and with ex-

    ternal reactive forces exerted by the support

    on the member

    b Displacement leading to influence line fo r H

    c

    Displacement leading

    to

    influence line fo r

    d

    Displacement leading to influence line fo r

    M

    .

    Fig.

    10.

    Influence lines fo r the deformations

    a

    Original structure

    d Deformation

    of

    the original structure due to

    a unit load applied at an arbitrary position

    2

    c

    Influence line fo r the vertical dejection at

    1

    d

    Influence line fo r a clockwise rotation at

    1

    measured on the original (model) structure under a

    known load acting at the point where the in ence

    characteristics are required.

    Consider the simple structure shown in Fig. 10a. It

    is required to find the influence lines for the vertical

    deflections and the planar rotation at the point 1 as a

    unit load crosses the span. Apply a unit load P at an

    arbitrary position 2: the deformed shape is shown in

    r i d prop

    C

    d 'I

    Fig.

    9.

    Dixere nt displacements fo r rigid and elastic

    supports

    2

    Strain , October,

    1968

    page forty-one

  • 8/10/2019 Indirect Model Study

    7/7

    Fig. lob. Remove

    P

    and apply a unit vertical load

    at 1 in the assumed positive direction of the deflection

    a t 1 (Fig. 1Oc).

    From the reciprocal theorem

    a12 =

    a21

    and the deformed shape (Fig. 1Oc) of the original

    structure is the influence line for the vertical deflection

    at 1 and represents the magnitude of the deflection

    directly if = 1. If V 1 then the ordinate at the

    arbitrary position 2 is

    and it will be necessary to know

    V

    before

    a12

    can be

    determined to give

    similarly in Fig. 10d:

    gives the influence line for the planar rotation at 1.

    If the model is deformed in the assumed positive

    direction of the d eformation required, the ordinate of

    the influence line will be positive if it has the sam e sense

    s the applied load. It will be observed that this is the

    reverse of the sign convention used in the influence

    lines for forces.

    To be continued

    6 = al2V

    a12 = 6lV (1 1)

    a12 = 6/M (12)

    COURSES IN STRAIN MEASURE-

    MENT AND ALLIED TOPICS

    The following courses are being held at the South

    Birmingham Technical College in association with the

    Mid lands Branch of the B.S.S.M.

    Short Courses

    1969

    18th Feb.-l8th March

    Basic Strain Measurement

    5

    Tuesdays)

    21st-25th April ,,

    9

    30th A p r . 4 t h May Three-Dimensional Photo-

    Courses

    of

    10 Monday evening lectures

    7th Oct.-9th Dec. Fat igue

    13th Jan.-l7th March Measu rement Techniques

    elasticity.

    and their application to

    Control

    Full details and application forms for any of the

    above courses can be ob tained on request from E. J.

    Hearn, Senior Lecturer Mech.Eng. Dept., South

    Birmingham Technical College, Bristol Ro ad S outh,

    Birmingham 3

    1

    Strain, October, 968 page forty-two

    DENFOIL

    DIE-CUT

    FOIL

    STR A IN GAUGES AND

    TEMPERA TURE SENSORS

    Produced by a patented process guaranteea

    to give you the advantages of flexibility , im-

    measurabte creep, repeatable performance,

    long-term stable shelf-life, highest fatigue

    life

    .

    Are these factors important to y ou ?

    C o m p e t i t iv e l y p r i c e d , p e r f o r m a n c e - p r o v e n

    DENFOIL Precision Die-Cut Strain Gauges and

    Temperature Sensors feature exclusive integral

    base and foil construction, and are available in a

    wide range of types for every application. W ant to

    know m ore? WRITE

    OR

    CA LL TODAY FOR 20-

    PAGE BULLETIN

    650.

    Milford Road, READING, Berks. Tel: 0734) 40166

    C A M