INDICATORSCORE(INTENSITYSCALE) Sustainable Plantation Forest Management

IINNDDIICCAATTOORR SSCCOORREE ((IINNTTEENNSSIITTYY SSCCAALLEE))SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee PPllaannttaattiioonn FFoorreesstt MMaannaaggeemmeenntt

11.. IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

LEI-04 Technical Document identifies the score (intensity scale) of every indicator of theSustainable Plant Forest Management (PHTL) certification in LEI Standard 5000-2. The intensityscale guides Expert Panel II during the performance evaluation and decision making process ofPHTL certification.

22.. SSccooppee

This document explicates the definition and scores (intensity scale) of every PHTL certificationassessment on production, ecology and social aspects.

33.. RReeffeerreennccee

a) LEI Standard 5000, Sustainable Production Forest Management (PHPL) System Frameb) LEI Standard 5000-2, Sustainable Plant Forest Management System.

44.. IInnddiiccaattoorr IInntteennssiittyy SSccaallee iinn SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee PPllaannttaattiioonn FFoorreesstt MMaannaaggeemmeenntt ((PPHHTTLL)) CCeerrttiiffiiccaattiioonnAAsssseessssmmeenntt

44..11 PPrroodduuccttiioonn AAssppeecctt

INDICATOR DEFINITION SCORE EXPLANATION

P1.1Land assurance as

planted forest area.

The suitability of a management unit area with landutilization procedure (Forest-Use Procedure/TGH,

Provincial Area-Use Plan/RTRWP, Present Land-Use/PLU) from the beginning until the minimum lengthof usage time will provide assurance to the area used.

To give further judicial assurance on land-use andreduce future land-use conflicts, every change in

forest function caused by changes in land-useprocedure must be reappointed as soon as possible.Guideposts are a form of sign/indication informing that

the area within the boundary is bound to certain rightsand function.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects; result of forest area recognition andborder management is acknowledged by related government organizations, various sectors; and the guidepost condition

meets the requirements.

The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects; result of forest land recognition and

border management is acknowledged by other users and related government organizations; but the condition of theguideposts has not meet the requirements.

The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects, but the community or the governmentonly acknowledges the result of recognition and forestland border management.

The assurance of the status of the management unit area meets all legal aspects, but the forestland recognition processand guidepost management are not finished yet.

The assurance of the status of the management unit area does not meet all legal aspects.

P1.2Forest fire

management system.

Forest fire is an alarming factor, which have a greatdeal of influence on resources as a whole.

Considering its effects beyond the boundaries and itsunexpectedness, it requires exceptional preparation ofmanagement in its prevention to gain forest

conservation. It can be represented withinorganizations, individuals, infrastructures and utilitiesthat are equivalent to the risk of fire incident.

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

Obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warningsystem, trained staff; and an adequate Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities

towards risks of fire.

Obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warning

system, trained staff; but no Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities towards risksof fire.

Obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early warningsystem, trained staff; but an inadequate Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activities

towards risks of fire.

Has not obtain an organization that involves the community/related government organizations, tools including an early

warning system, trained staff; and a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for preventive and suppressive activitiestowards risks of fire.

P1.3Main plant selection,

silviculture systemand techniques.

Main plant selection, action (system and technique) ofsilviculture in management plan level, and its

implementation based on considerations thatcorresponds with corporate goal, land supportcapabilities, ecosystem and surrounding social

condition, will provide an accomplishment ofmanagement unit in managing its resources.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Selection of main plant types and silviculture that suits the land support capability, local ecosystem and the socialcondition of the community.

Selection of main plant types and silviculture determined and implemented according to the existing regulation.

Selection of main plant types and the selected of silviculture actions is unsuitably implemented according to the landsupport capability, local ecosystem and social condition of the community.

No effort in selecting and implementing main plant type and silviculture.


P1.4Non-timber forest

product utilizationimprovement.

Forests are not only useful for its wood; thus, there areefforts in optimizing other form of use, as service or

product. The planted forest being developed willbenefit the community. The existence and potential ofnon-timber forest products will provide opportunities

and guarantees to the planted forest itself.

Good

Average

Bad

Developed non-timber forest product potential and obtain a sustainable management.

Developed an effort in non-timber forest product potential development, but not able to utilize it sustainably.

No effort in developing non-timber forest product.

P1.5Stumpage growth andmonitoring

implementation andresults.

Permanent Sample Plots (PUP) is used as fieldlaboratory or as growth increment monitoring media tocreate volume table, silviculture treatment testing, and

other research and development activities forsustainable production forest. The level of significancein long-term forest production estimation is determined

by sampling procedure and intensity in the repeatedinventory listing. Repeated inventory is needed to fix

predetermined planning, which can be performedevery three to ten years depending on the maturitycycle, total managed area, and disruption and failure

occurred.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

Measurement of growth and its increment, which then followed by repeated inventory at a certain period has beensatisfactorily accomplished according to the existing scientific standards; and has been utilized in setting themanagement plan, other types of utilization and its revision.

Measurement of growth and its increment, which then followed by repeated inventory at a certain period has beensatisfactorily accomplished according to the existing scientific standards; but and has not been utilized in setting the

management plan, other types of utilization and its revision.

Measurement of growth and its increment, which then followed by repeated inventory at a certain period has beenaccomplished but not according to the existing scientific standards; and has been utilized in setting the managementplan, other types of utilization and its revision.

Measurement of growth and its increment implemented using repeated inventory has been accomplished but notaccording to the existing scientific standards; and has not been utilized in setting the management plan, other types of

utilization and its revision.

Measurement of growth and its increment has not been implemented.

P1.6Annual production

according to forestproductivity, plantingcapability, and land

support.

The annual production allotment is measured up with

the maximum land capability to produce biomass persize or time unit, and its replanting capability. Forestproduct (timber) will sustain if the maximum output

equals to the determined production allotment. Then,the time-based timber forest product harvestingroutine will simplify the sustainability arrangement for

the next cycle.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The annual forest production is completed according to the product arrangement plan that has been set according to asound data that suits the replanting ability.

The annual forest production is completed according to the product arrangement plan that has been set but notaccording to a sound data that suits the replanting ability.

The annual forest production shows to be lower than the forest capability, but consistent with its replanting capability.

The annual forest production results are not as planned and expected that a low-production have occurred and itsreplanting capability is low.

There is no forest result arrangement and its production is always higher than its replanting capability.


P1.7Quality of Forest Area

Clearing.

Forest Area Clearing must be planned by consideringthe fulfillment of all activity aspect (mobilization) in

forest development especially forest productproduction. The optimum intensity or compactness

and total road length (main, branch or skid trail),location, and road and bridge construction quality iscarried out to ensure the continuity of operational

activity in the development and guidance of plantationforest and forest production activities, and itsmaintenance aspects.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are planned and implemented according to the existing standards.

Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are planned and implemented accordingly but the quality was not good.

Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are not yet planned according to what has been implemented.

Forest Area Clearing (PWH) facilities and infrastructure are planned and implemented not according to the existing standards.

There was no Forest Area Clearing (PWH) plan.

P1.8Publication of rights

towards the forestarea.

Publication of rights of the area, especially to the

community within and around the management unit toprovide and achieve an understanding in communityawareness enhancement to actively participate in the

forest resource sustainability.

Good

Average

Bad

There are efforts in periodical assistance or publication of community rights towards the management unit area.

There are efforts in periodical assistance or publication of community rights towards the management unit area with low intensity.

There are no efforts in periodical assistance or publication of community rights towards the management unit area.

P1.9Organization unit inforest management.

The existence of organization units on planning,production, forest support, research and development,

conservation and environment, social community,finance and administration, marketing/distribution, andindependent Internal Supervisory Unit (SPI) and

supported with sufficient number of qualifiedemployees can act as indicator of sincerity of the

plantation forest company in production sustainability.

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

All organization units are present independently and obtain sound coordination.

All organization units are present independently but do not reach a sound coordination.

Not organization unit are independent and obtain sound coordination.

The organization unit is not complete or sufficient and obtains no coordination.

P2.1Forest disruptionrange.

Any form of forest disruption will have significant effecton yield sustainability, therefore, the size of disruption

must be acknowledged to be able to determine theappropriate actions. Moreover, protection activitiesmust be performed to reduce the existing disruption

level.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Relatively no deforestation or conversion, illegal logging, forest fire, or other kinds of disruption.

The effects of deforestation, conversion, illegal logging, forest fire or other kinds of disruption does not change the type and function

of the forest, yet, the preplanned production management can still be accomplished.

The effects of deforestation, conversion, illegal logging, forest fire or other kinds of disruption does not change the type and function

of the forest, which made the preplanned production management revised.

The effects of deforestation, conversion, illegal logging, forest fire or other kinds of disruption changed the forest landscape so that

the predetermined corporate vision and objectives must be revised.


P2.2

Seed availability.The availability of seedling with genetically, physicallyand physiologically sound quality, sufficient supply,and at appropriate timing is a basic asset in achieving

production sustainability in forest plantation. Seedlingwith high genetic quality is likely to increase biomass

productivity, which is the objective of forest productionin each rotation. Sufficient supply of seedling and itsappropriate timing will ensure the success of planting

and maintenance activities, and achievement of forestproduction target, also in reducing plant mortality rate.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The seedlings are produced in an appropriate quantity, high in quality, and at the right time.

The seedlings are produced in an appropriate quantity, at the right time, but with average quality.

The seedling are produced in an appropriate quantity, but not at the right time

The seedlings are produced in a less appropriate quantity, not at the right time, or at the right quantity and the right time but in lowquality.

The seedling are produced less in quantity, low in quality and not at the right time.

P2.3Planting capability

and result quality.

Planting capability is a basic asset towards forest

production sustainability for the next cycle. Plantingstatistics are a record of planting completed yearsbefore that consist of planting quantification and its

achievements, and other records of matters related toplanting procedure, unaccomplishment, barriers and

what causes it.

The records can be used as monitoring and evaluation

material leading to planting procedure improvement forbetter assurance of future production sustainability.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The planting reached 100% of the targeted area with good planting quality.

The planting reached 100% of the targeted area but with a reduced amount of planting quality.

The planting reached 90% to <100% of the targeted area.

The planting reached 70% to 90% of the targeted area.

The planting reached <70% of the targeted area.

P2.4Maintenance

capability and resultquality.

Basically, maintenance provides growth space for

every plant. Appropriate procedure, order andmaintenance intensity for every growth level will

provide bigger growth opportunity. As with harvesting,order in time-based maintenance activities will simplify

the management of sustainability for the next cycleand it can support the realization of productionsustainability.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The maintenance reached an area of <90% of the planned target with good quality.

The maintenance reached an area of >90% of the planned target but with a reduced amount of quality

The maintenance reached an area of 70%-90% of the planned target.

The maintenance reached an area of 50%-70% of the planned target.

The maintenance reached an area of <50% of the planned target.


P2.5

Environmental-friendlyforest harvest system

implementation.

Every forest product harvesting stage that effect theenvironment (especially vital negative effects) must be

plotted clearly in terms of location, type and weight ofeffects occurred, so that control implementation suchas reduced impact logging can be determined in

minimizing the effects on the location of harvest.

The procurement of erosion control structures at skid

trail, transportation road, log-yard, and at otherstructural areas is one of the efforts in forest utilizationimpact control towards physical components of the

environment, which soon after, decreases negativeimpacts on production sustainability.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The result of the implementation of forest product harvesting particularly the reduced impact logging in all Forest Clearing Area

scheme, shows that it went well through information, organization, and action (SOP) monitoring instrument to hold back the negativeimpact of forest product harvesting.

The result of the implementation of forest product harvesting particularly the reduced impact logging in all Forest Clearing Areascheme, shows that it did not went well, although the information, organization, and action (SOP) monitoring instrument to hold back

the negative impact of forest product harvesting existed.

There were no important impact indicator map, the information, organization, and action (SOP) monitoring instrument to hold back

the negative impact of forest product harvesting, and the reduced impact logging was not implemented.

P2.6Management

Information System.

Managerial policy in terms of the seriousness of the

plantation forest company in production sustainability,will be identified from the management informationsystem, whether it was being used in the decision

making process or not. Therefore, it requires amonitoring and management system proportionate tothe size of the management unit area and clarity of

decision-making procedure that matches decisions inevery organization unit (planning, production and

control, and other work support unit).

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The information, organization, and action (SOP) supervisors are present; MIS instruments can be utilized by all level (within theorganization structure) and can be controlled by the Internal Supervising System (Sistem Pengawas Internal [SPI]). Manage a

synchronized decision making process between planning and production units (planning unit as work reference).

The information, organization, and action supervisors are present and can be controlled by the Internal Supervising System (Sistem

Pengawas Internal [SPI]), but the MIS instruments can only be used by certain level (within the organization structure).

The information, organization, and action supervisors are present and can be controlled by the Internal Supervising System (Sistem

Pengawas Internal [SPI]), but the MIS instruments can not be utilized at all levels.

The information, organization, and action supervisors are present but the SPI cannot function properly, and the MIS instrumentscannot be utilized at all levels.

There is no synchronized decision making process between planning and production units and SPI cannot function properly.

P2.7The continuance andorderliness of funding

for every activityaspects.

Forest management sustainability requires sufficientfunding for forest reformation and conservation,

conservation area and natural biodiversitymanagement (includingprotected/endemic/endangered species), forest

production and control, market/customer service,research and development, and facility and workequipment procurement, and also human resource

development.

Very Good

Good

Bad

Very Bad

A sufficient amount of funding is available; it is made rational, and easily obtained.

A sufficient amount of funding is available; it is made rational, but not easily obtainable.

The available funding is insufficient, but is easily obtained.

The available funding is insufficient and not easily obtainable.


P3.1Production area

organization.

Area partitioning according to its purposes is based on

land physical characteristics that are not managedproperly, such as mountain slopes and its sensitivitytowards erosion, and external factors such as rain

intensity. It is then followed with an effective areasetting into a sustainable unit and/or part of a forestinto blocks that must show the existence of time

dimension during a cycle. Block and plot in the fieldmust be arranged according to rational and consistent

time scheduling to minimize technical and financialstructure alteration practices. Therefore, forestdevelopment practices, maintenance and production

can be accurately implemented.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

There are implementations of proper planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management, andformed /resembling a normal forest classification.

T There are implementations of proper planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management, but hasnot formed a normal forest classification.

There are implementations of proper planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management, butactions towards the content of a block was not properly done and did not form a normal forest classification.

The organization of parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management only came to the planning stage.

There are no planning activities on parts of the forest, compartmentalizing, and yield management or its implementation in the field.

P3.2Efficiency onharvesting and

utilization of plantedforest products.

The high level of harvesting productivity is representedby the comparison between the sizes of production

and potential of the harvested forest, which can beattained if harvesting is performed in an efficient way.

This is shown by the exploitation factor unit, maximumutilization of forest products (wood biomass), andappropriate harvesting system or technique, so that

these important factors act as reference for plantationforest product harvesting technique.

Good

Average

Bad

High exploitation factor with minimum waste.

High exploitation factor with relatively high waste formation.

The exploitation factor is not appropriate with high waste formation.

P3.3

Internal forest productadministration.

Forest product business administration from the forest

to last log pond in the management unit can provideguarantee of forest product harvesting implementation

control, in terms of quantity and origin. The letteringmethod used can at least guarantee an orderlyadministration process and can avoid forest product

distribution outflow.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

There is an internal forest product management and running properly.

There is an internal forest product management, but not running properly.

There is no internal forest product management.


P3.4Compatibility of theeffective production

area with theexpected business

profitability/corporatesoundness.

Business profitability that can reach the minimumattractive rate of return (MARR) is the main

prerequisite for a management unit. Every cost mustbe covered by revenue; especially those that come

from utilized forest products. Without being able toreach MARR, the effects of high cost and/or lowrevenue will bring in potential excess felling or

digression from production sustainability regulations.Nevertheless, corporate soundness will depend on itsdaily condition.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Liquidity of >200%, profitability and solvability of ≥ interest rate.

Liquidity of 100-200%, profitability and solvability of ≥ the interest rate.

Liquidity of <100%, profitability and solvability of ≥ the interest rate.

Liquidity of <100%, profitability and solvability of < the interest rate.

P3.5Plantation forest

research utilizationand development.

Every management activity aspect, especially

treatment on silviculture to increase sustainable forestproductivity, improvement of product quality andperformance must utilize research and development

resulted from the R&D division or other R&Dinstitutions.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Utilizing self-research and development results or other R&D firm’s as means of corporate quality and performance improvement.

Utilizing self-research and development results as means of corporate quality and performance improvement.

Not yet utilizing research and development results as means of corporate quality and performance improvement.

Not utilizing research and development results at all and no effort in corporate quality and performance improvement (no R&D unit).

P3.6Establishment of

business partnershipwith the localcommunity.

Business partnership establishment with the local

community confirms that the management unit iswelcomed in the region. The development of publicforest and community forest cultivation till alter the

attention and dependency of the local community forthe plantation forestland; they even can be partners inmanaging the forest. Moreover, forest product

utilization management must be capable inaccommodating the interest of the local community

who is dependent to the forest.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

Obtain a business partnership with the local community in main and supporting activities with equal share.

Obtain a business partnership with the local community only in main activities with equal share.

Obtain a business partnership with the local community only in supporting activities with equal share.

Obtain a business partnership with the local community but without equal share.

There is no business partnership with the local community.

P3.7Forest stumpageasset enhancement.

The increasing forest stumpage/stand asset andconsidered as capital that must not depreciate is an

effort on business improvement and reinvestment thatperforms long-term costing.

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

There are capital assets and reinvested in the forest so that assets in forest stands always increases.

There are capital assets and reinvested in the forest but assets in forest stands do not increase (stable).

There are capital assets but only some are reinvested in the forest in the form of forest stands.

There are capital assets but only a small number are reinvested in the forest in the form of forest stands.

44..22 EEccoollooggyy//EEnnvviirroonnmmeenntt AAssppeecctt


E1.1The percentage or actual breadth

ratio of an appointed and wellrunning conservation area, to itsideal breadth.

Conservation region that has been appointed

and/or acknowledged by related stakeholders andmet the environmental biophysical considerationswill guarantee the maintenance of land quality

and the sustainability of the water managementwithin the plantation forest management.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is>80% from the ideal breadth and well functioning.

The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is 50-80% from the ideal breadth and well-functioning and/or the proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was

appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is >80% from the ideal breadth and functioning in an average performance.

The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is

<50% from the ideal breadth and well-functioning and/or the proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that wasappointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is 50-80% from the ideal breadth and functioning in an average performance

and/or acknowledged by related parties is >80% from the ideal breadth and badly functioning.

The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is

<50% from the ideal breadth and functioning in an average performance and/or acknowledged by related parties is 50-80% fromthe ideal breadth and badly functioning.

The proportion of the actual breadth of the protected land that that was appointed and/or acknowledged by related parties is<50% from the ideal breadth and badly functioning.

E1.2The planning of effective

production area structuring basedon the appropriateness andcapability of land and its water

function continuance.

The effective production area is a land within the

plantation forest area that can be effectivelyplanted with selected plants based on ecologicalfeasibility and corresponds with corporate goals.

To make sure that the productivity of the selectedplant is guaranteed in a long period, the effective

production area must be managed based on theland compatibility and capability, and thesustainability of the water management function.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The production area is appropriate and more than 80% of the area is structured.

The production area is adequately appropriate and/or the production area is appropriate and more than 50-80% of the area isstructured.

The production area is very appropriate but the area structured is less than 50% and/or the production area is adequatelyappropriate and the structured area is 50-80% and/or the production area is in accordance to its margin and the area structuredis more than 80%.

The production area is adequately appropriate but the area structured is less than 50% and/or the production area is in

accordance to its margin and the structured area is 50-80%.

The production area is in accordance to its margin but the area structured is less than 50%.


E1.3The percentage or ratio of the

actual boundaries of aconservation area and effectiveproduction area (appropriateness

and capability of land and its waterfunction continuance) to its idealboundaries.

Border management or border sign is one of the

indicators to show that an arrangement has beendone. Arrangements based on the ideal ratio ofthe conservation and production forest on the

actual border sign will guarantee the sustainabilityof land and water function.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is >80% from the ideal quantity and well functioning.

The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is 50-80% from the ideal quantity and well functioning and/orthe proportion of the actual protected land and production area is >80% from the ideal quantity and has average function.

The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is <50% from the ideal quantity and well-functioning and/or theproportion of the actual protected land and production area is 50-80% from the ideal quantity and has average function and/orthe proportion of the actual protected land and production area is >80% from the ideal quantity and badly functioning.

The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is <50% from the ideal quantity and has average function and/or

the proportion of the actual protected land and production area is 50-80% from the ideal quantity and badly functioning.

The proportion of the actual protected land and production area is <50% from the ideal quantity and badly functioning.

E1.4

The percentage or ratio of theboundaries of a well runningconservation area to its ideal

boundaries.

The stated conservation area will not be noticed ifthere are no clear guideposts on the borders. Theposts will clearly state the border between the

conservation area (height, slope steepness, andpeat density) with the production/felling area andother areas. These guideposts will not indicate

anything unless maintained properly.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is >80% from its ideal quantity and well functioning.

The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is 50-80% from its ideal quantity and well functioning and/or theproportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is >80% from its ideal quantity and has average function.

The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is <50% from its ideal quantity and well-functioning and/or theproportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is 50-80% from its ideal quantity and has average function and/or the

proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is >80% from its ideal quantity and badly functioning.

The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is <50% from its ideal quantity and has average function and/or theproportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is 50-80% from its ideal quantity and badly functioning.

The proportion of the actual border signs of a protected land is <50% from its ideal quantity and badly functioning.

E1.5The planning and implementation

of silviculture system that cancontrol erosion in the cut up orproduction area.

Erosion caused by silviculture practices such as

during felling period or land clearing can becontrolled by repairing land coverings as soon aspossible through planting and mulching, and

minimizing the usage of heavy equipment thatmight increase soil density, which burdens landquality (soil physics and chemistry) and water

management.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

The SOP on silviculture system implementation meets the standards and has good implementation level.

The SOP on silviculture system implementation meets the standards and has average implementation level and/or the SOPdoes not meet the standards but has good implementation level.

The SOP on silviculture system implementation meets the standards but has poor implementation level and/or the SOP doesnot meet the standards but has average implementation level.

The SOP on silviculture system implementation does not meet the standards and has poor implementation level.


E1.6Change in soil fertility (physical

and chemical), including theproduction waste contamination.

Production activities that involves land

preparation to plantation, maintenance andharvesting, significantly influence soil fertilitylevel, in terms of soil chemical and physical

elements. Soil fertility can be disrupted by theabundance of chemistry/organic substances

caused by over-fertilization or contamination inthe production process such as mycorhizza fungicontamination that affects land fertility. Change in

fertility level will tend to decrease if themanagement unit does not maintain land fertility,stated in the nutrient budget, soil compaction, and

the top soil and type of plant.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

There is an increase in land fertility and no trace of contamination.

Land fertility is stable and no trace of contamination and/or land fertility increases but there is a trace of contamination.

Land fertility decreases and no trace of contamination and/or land fertility is stable but there is a trace of contamination.

Land fertility decreases and there is a trace of contamination.

E1.7The percentage of change of land

erosion on the production area.

The loss of top soil more than the tolerable soilloss level shows that the plantation forest

management disregards soil conservationaspects. The effect of plantation forest toward soilother than accelerated erosion is the decrease in

soil physical character, such as compaction,caused by incorrect land clearing method. Then itis the increase of surface run-off, cause by soil

compaction that can cause change in river flowdebit.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

Erosion Danger Index is low (IBE < 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids contentin the water body is low (< 100 mg/l).

Erosion Danger Index is low (IBE < 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids contentin the water body is average (100 - 250 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is average (IBE = 1) and the contribution of the

management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is low (< 100 mg/l).

Erosion Danger Index is low (IBE < 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content

in the water body is high (> 100 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is high (IBE > 1) and the contribution of the managementunit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is low (< 100 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is average

(IBE = 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is average(100 - 250 mg/l).

Erosion Danger Index is average (IBE = 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solidscontent in the water body is high (> 250 mg/l) and/or Erosion Danger Index is high (IBE > 1) and the contribution of themanagement unit towards the total suspension solids content in the water body is average (100 - 250 mg/l).

Erosion Danger Index is high (IBE > 1) and the contribution of the management unit towards the total suspension solids content

in the water body is high (> 250 mg/l).


E1.8The percentage of change or

disappearance of vegetationstructure and species in theconservation area.

The vegetation structure in the conservation area

is closely related to the interception of rainfall(stem-flow and throughfall) and into the soil.

This relates to the erosion control and water

management around water bodies. Therefore, ifthe vegetation structure around the water body

cannot support rainfall interception, erosion levelwill increase in the area and disrupt the functionsof the water bodies. Besides as wildlife’s habitat

and corridor, and source of genes, secure placefor plant community and types, the conservationforest must also be the center of attention in

activities in natural environment resourcesprotection and maintenance by the plantation

forest management unit.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

The vegetation structure changes <10% and no species missing.

The vegetation structure changes 20-30% but there are missing species.

The vegetation structure changes 40% and no species missing and/or the vegetation structure changes 20-30% but there are

missing species.

The vegetation structure changes >40% but there are missing species.

E1.9The percentage of quantitative

change (river debit), continuitychange (constant water supply)and quality change (chemical,

solid, and suspension) in waterbodies to the existing standardmeasurement caused by

management unit’s activity.

The vegetation structure in the conservation area

is closely related to the interception of rainfall(stem-flow and throughfall) and into the soil.

This relates to the erosion control and water

management around water bodies. Therefore, ifthe vegetation structure around the water body

cannot support rainfall interception, erosion levelwill increase in the area and disrupt the functionsof the water bodies. Besides as wildlife’s habitat

and corridor, and source of genes, secure placefor plant community and types, the conservationforest must also be the center of attention in

activities in natural environment resourcesprotection and maintenance by the plantation

forest management unit.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debits is low (Qmax/Qmin < 20) and thephysic-chemical quality of water is high according to the existing quality standard.

In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is low (Qmax/Qmin < 20) and thephysic-chemical quality of water is average according to the existing quality standard and/or the ratio between

maximum/minimum debit is average (Qmax/Qmin 20-50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is good according to theexisting quality standard.

In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is low (Qmax/Qmin < 20) and thephysic-chemical quality of water is bad according to the existing quality standard and/or the ratio between maximum/minimum

debit is high (Qmax/Qmin > 50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is good according to the existing quality standardand/or the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is average (Qmax/Qmin 20-50) and the physic-chemical quality of water isaverage according to the existing quality standard.

In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is average (Qmax/Qmin 20-50) andthe physic-chemical quality of water is bad according to the existing quality standard and/or the ratio between

maximum/minimum debit is high (Qmax/Qmin > 50) and the physic-chemical quality of water is average according to theexisting quality standard.

In relation to the management unit activities, the ratio between maximum/minimum debit is high (Qmax/Qmin > 50) the physic-chemical quality of water is bad according to the existing quality standard.

E1.10

Land utilization pattern/systemimplementation in plantingactivities and plant forest

stumpage maintenance, whichmay influence land quality andwater course function.

Land quality condition and water management

function sustainability is influenced by landutilization system/pattern using suitable plant type

and considers the condition of the localenvironment, biophysical and social culturalelements of the community.

Good

Average

Bad

There is a system/pattern of land utilization that provides benefit to the community and the main plant stands/stumpage.

There is a system/pattern of land utilization but does not provide benefit to the community or the main plant stands/stumpage.

There is no system/pattern of land utilization.


E1.11Protection of land from erosion

and land and water contamination(the usage of pesticide, herbicide,and environmental-friendly

fertilizer).

Intensity of impact control on soil shows the

persistence of the plantation forest managementin avoiding impact of the plantation forestutilization on environmental physical components.

Impact control on soil can be shown in soilconservation activities.

Good

Average

Bad

Obtain SOP in soil protection from erosion and implements it in the field.

Obtain SOP in soil protection from erosion but does not implement it in the field.

There is no SOP on soil protection from erosion.

E1.12Activities in maintenance and

rehabilitation of forest typestructure and composition(vegetation) of conservation area.

The sustainability of the function of conservation

region within a plantation forest management unitcan be maintained if the vegetation structure inthe region is well taken care of. Therefore, the

water management function will also run well.Further, in vegetation structure rehabilitation and

maintenance, screening of plant types needsattention to ensure long-term land and watermanagement function.

Good

Average

Bad

Obtain SOP in structure maintenance and rehabilitation and forest type (vegetation) composition, and implements it in the field.

Obtain SOP in structure maintenance and rehabilitation and forest type (vegetation) composition, but does not implement it inthe field.

There is no SOP in structure maintenance and rehabilitation and forest type (vegetation) composition.

E1.13

Waste handling system topreserve land quality andwatercourse function

sustainability.

A water body is a river mouth for waste (organicand inorganic) produced by all activities in theplantation forest management unit. Most waste is

non-biodegradable (plastic, tin can, etc.) andrequires special treatment to avoid contaminationto the environment. The location of the waste

treatment facility determines the possibilities/consequences towards the sustainability of land

quality and water function. If the location andtreatment are not accurately determined, thesustainability of water function in the water bodies

may possibly be disrupted.

Good

Average

Bad

Obtain waste handling SOP and implements it in the field.

Obtain waste handling SOP but does not implement it in the field.

There is no waste handling SOP.

E1.14Usage of chemical elements that

may contaminate water.

The utilization of chemical elements in the

management unit can potentially contaminatewater bodies. Therefore, it must be carefullymanaged.

Good

Average

Bad

Does not use any chemical substances.

Uses chemical substances but cannot be traced in the water body.

Uses chemical substances that can be traced in the water body.


E1.15Active community involvement inthe environmental-friendly land

utilization pattern system.

In increasing community welfare, a vastopportunity is made available in the management

unit area. They are opportunities to use soil andland as extensive as possible as long as it doesnot disrupt the main plants and can increase its

quality.

Good

Average

Bad

The community group involved in the management unit activities focuses on a business that does not depend on the land.

The community group involved in the plantation forest management unit activities focuses on a business that depends on the

land by implementing soil conservation techniques.

The community group involved in the plantation forest management unit activities focuses on a business that depends on the

land without implementing soil conservation techniques.

E2.1The percentage of the actual

breadth of the conservation area(gene resources, exotic and/orendangered flora/fauna habitat,

wildlife corridor, buffer zone, andappointed and well-managedforest resources and utilized by

the community) to the idealbreadth of the conservation area.

Protected areas based on the sustainability of

gene resources, unique and/or endangeredflora/fauna habitation, wildlife corridor, bufferzone, and well-managed forest resources and its

recognition by stakeholders and the fulfillment inmeeting field biophysical considerations willguarantee the preservation of natural diversity.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is >80% from its ideal breadth that must be structuredand well functioned.

The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is 50-80% from its ideal breadth that must bestructured and well functioned and/or the actual breadth of the well-structured protected land is >80% from its ideal breadth that

must be structured and functioned in an average performance.

The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is <50% from its ideal breadth that must be structured

and well-functioned and/or the proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is 50-80% from its idealbreadth that must be structured and functioned in an average performance and/or the proportion of the well-structured actual

breadth of the protected land is >80% from its ideal breadth that must be structured and badly functioned.

The proportion of the well-structured actual breadth of the protected land is <50% from its ideal breadth that must be structured

and functioned in an average performance and/or the proportion of the well structured actual breadth of the protected land is 50-80% from its ideal breadth that must be structured and badly functioned.

The proportion of the actual breadth of the well-structured protected land and badly functioned is <50% of its ideal breadth thatmust be structured.

E2.2The area structuring of

management unit based on theimportance of flora/fauna

conservation, plant foreststumpage protection, and forestresources that is very useful for

the local community.

The arrangement of the management unit

working area that considers the interest offlora/fauna conservation, plantation forest standsand resources that is useful to the local

community will guarantee the preservation of thenatural diversity besides maintaining the stability

of the ecosystem of plantation forest stands in thelong run.

Good

Average

Bad

The management unit area structuring considers the importance of flora/fauna conservation; plantation forest stands protection,and forest resources that are beneficial to the local community.

The management unit area structuring less considers the importance of flora/fauna conservation; plantation forest stands

protection, and forest resources that are beneficial to the local community.

The management unit area structuring does not consider the importance of flora/fauna conservation; plantation forest stands

protection, and forest resources that are beneficial to the local community.


E2.3The percentage of the actualbreadth of conservation area

(gene resources, exotic and/orendangered flora/fauna habitat,wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and

life plant area utilized by thecommunity) that is well structuredto the ideal breadth of the

conservation area.

The conservation area (gene resources,unique/endemic and/or endangered flora/fauna

habitation, wildlife corridor, buffer zone) that arewell structured and clearly mapped, whichexistence can be easily monitored and evaluated

in relation to the process of the system within theunit and the surrounding area to guarantee asustainable natural diversity.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is >80% of the ideal proportion and wellfunctioning.

The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is 50-80% of the ideal proportion andwell functioning and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is >80% of theideal proportion and functioning in average performance.

The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is <50% of the ideal proportion and well-functioning and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is 50-80% of the ideal

proportion and functioning in an average performance and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the naturaldiversity) arranged is >80% of the ideal proportion and badly functioning.

The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is <50% of the ideal proportion andfunctioning in an average performance and/or the actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity)

arranged is 50-80% of the ideal proportion and badly functioning.

The actual proportion of the protected area (considering the natural diversity) arranged is <50% of the ideal proportion and badly

functioning.

E2.4The assurance/maintenance of

conservation area security (generesources, exotic and/orendangered flora/fauna habitat,

wildlife corridor, buffer zone, andforest resources utilized by thecommunity).

Border maintenance means not only maintaining

guideposts and inspection route but also thecontrol shift of conservation area function to otherform, and reducing the size of the area that has

no clear reasonable basis. Further, the meaningof maintenance should include activities inevaluation and rehabilitation of conservation area

condition, to keep it well functioning in the longrun.

Good

Average

Bad

The conservation area (gene resources, exotic and/or endangered flora/fauna habitat, wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and forestresources utilized by the community) is in a safe condition.

The conservation area (gene resources, exotic and/or endangered flora/fauna habitat, wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and forestresources utilized by the community) is in a less safe condition.

The conservation area (gene resources, exotic and/or endangered flora/fauna habitat, wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and forestresources utilized by the community) is not in a safe condition.

E2.5

Wildlife diversity in the productionarea.

The main plant management in the plantationforest area influences the diversity of wildlife inthe region. Based on the early condition of the

wildlife habitat, the plantation forest managementcan decrease and/or increase their diversity.

Good

Average

Bad

There is an increase in wildlife diversity in the production area.

There is no increase in wildlife diversity in the production area.

There is a reduction in wildlife diversity in the production area.


E2.6Forest resources information

system (location, potential,cultivation technique, harvestingtechnique, etc.).

The development of the natural resource

information network system by the managementunit and other stakeholders is an implementationof the natural diversity conservation strategy and

welfare improvement of the local community. Withthis system, the local community can utilize thenatural resources appropriately in a long period.

Moreover, the local community can participate inmaintaining and protecting its natural resources.

Good

Average

Bad

There are forest resource information system design and being implemented in the field.

There are forest resource information system design but not implemented in the field.

There is no forest resource information system design.

E2.7

Pest, disease, and parasite controlactivities using environmental-friendly technology (using natural

predator), so that the naturalecosystem in the managementunit area won’t be disrupted.

Control over pest/disease and parasite is anecessary action in maintaining forest stands. Inits activity, the actions are conducted by avoiding

or restricting the usage of chemical-basedpesticides, parasite control, which is consideredto have significant effects on natural diversity.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Control of pest/disease and parasites using integrated pest management system and does not disrupt the ecological system.

Control of pest/disease and parasites biologically and does not disrupt the ecological system and/or control of pest/disease andparasites using integrated pest management system that disrupts the ecological system.

Control of pest/disease and parasites using chemical substances and does not disrupt the ecological system and/or control ofpest/disease and parasites biologically that disrupts the ecological system.

Control of pest/disease and parasites using chemical substances that disrupts the ecological system.

E2.8The existence of forest resources

that can be utilized by the localcommunity.

To create a condition where forest resources can

be utilized sustainably by the community, onemust actively involved in forest resourcemanagement within the plantation forest

management unit.

Good

Average

Bad

There are forest resources that can be utilized by the local community, who has access in utilizing it.

There are forest resources that can be utilized by the local community, who has access in utilizing it but does not practice it.

There are forest resources that can be utilized by the local community but the locals do not have access to it.

44..33 SSoocciiaall EEccoonnoommyy aanndd CCuullttuurraall AAssppeecctt


S1.1

The certainty of theforest utilization area

status.

Forest deployment in a certain region must complywith the land tenure system, which some are

represented in various pattern of land use. Therefore,the status of the utilization area must be clear in itsownership and purpose. The concession area and the

local community must be free of all claims ofpossession and of forced clearance by each party.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

No claim on the status of land utilization area.

There are claims on the land utilization area resolved through an agreed upon conflict management system.

There are claims and conflicts of the land utilization area that are not resolved through the agreed upon conflict management system.

S1.2The certainty of

access to the forestutilization by the

community.

The management unit provides certainty and

assurance to the local community to utilize non-timberresources in the concession area such as water,animals and other non-timber forest products. This

utilization must be permitted as long as it does notalter land use.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The local community is allowed to continue the non-timber natural resource utilization within the management unit concession areaaccording the agreed procedure, and there are facilities for the community, provided by the unit, for utilizing non-timber natural

resources.

The local community is allowed to continue the non-timber natural resource utilization within the management unit concession areaaccording the agreed procedure but there are no facilities for the community provided by the unit for utilizing non-timber naturalresources.

The local community is prohibited to continue the non-timber natural resource utilization within the management unit concessionarea.

S1.3

The assurance ofcommunications andtransportations.

The development of the business area of amanagement unit must consider communication andtraditional transportation lines that exists before the

presence of the unit.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit maintained and enhanced the quality of existing communication and traditional transportation lines prior to

management unit presence.

The management unit does not disrupt the quality of existing communication and traditional transportation lines prior to management

unit presence.

The management unit damages and/or closes the existing communication and traditional transportation lines prior to management

unit presence.

S1.4Employment

opportunity for thecommunity.

The management unit should take into account

matters of employment related to the recruitmentprocess for the local community. The process shouldconsider the available local employment market.

Information on vacancies in the unit must be madepublic, indiscriminating, and sufficient.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, and publicized at community level, and there are >50% of theworkers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.

The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, and publicized at community level, and there are 31-50% of theworkers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.

The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, but merely publicized at community level, and there are 15-30% ofthe workers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession.

The recruitment of employees is open-based, non-discriminative, but not publicized at community level, and there are <15% of the

workers who came from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.

There are no workers coming from the community surrounding the management unit forest concession area.


S1.5Management unitinfrastructure

utilization by thecommunity.

In daily social economic environment, themanagement unit permits the local community to use

the physical facilities built in the concession area giventhat it does not disrupt any process and notendangering the safety of the community.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit allows the local community to use the available physical and social facility.

The management unit allows the local community to use the available physical or social facility.

The management unit prohibits the local community to use the available physical or social facility.

S2.1

The management unitconsiders the socialcultural impact to the

community.

In forest utilization activities, the management unitmust consider the social and cultural impact such asisolation caused by a condition where a community is

separated from the forest utilization process; impactcausing cultural degradation such as the impairment of

a historical site and lost of access to perform socialcultural activities in a certain location caused by theprocess.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The existence of the social cultural activities of the community and artifacts found within the concession area are sustained and

protected by the management unit and excluded from the working area.

The social cultural activities of the community and artifacts found within the concession area are excluded from the working area.

The management unit neglects the existence of the social cultural activities of the community and artifacts found within the

concession area.

S2.2Consequences

towards utilization ordamage of resourcesowned by local

community.

The management unit recompenses the

consequences caused by its activities that impair thenatural resources, transfers of rights of ownership andthe possibility of utilizing local knowledge. The

recompensation must be performed rationally andmutually based on collective agreement and compliedby the parties involved. Therefore, the unit is expected

to develop a procedure of compensation towards theutilization or impairment of resources owned by the

community.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

The management unit recompenses the loss suffered by the community according to a mutual agreement, benefiting both parties.

The management unit recompense the loss suffered by the community but not according to a mutual agreement set by both parties.

The management unit recompenses the loss suffered by the community according to the agreement based on the existing regulation

of the authorities.

The management unit recompenses the loss suffered by the community according to the standards set by the management unit.

The management unit does not recompensate the loss suffered by the community caused by the forest utilization activities.

S2.3

Increasing the varietyof economicresources for the local

community.

Forest utilization activities held by the managementunit are expected to provide economic benefit to thelocal community such as creating employment

opportunities related to the presence. The opportunitywill increase the choices of jobs for the community.The unit is also expected to develop an economic

development program based on the local potentials.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The employment variation increases as to the presence of the forest utilization activities and support of the management unit, which

increases community household income.

The employment variation increases as to the presence of the forest utilization activities and support of the management unit, but

does not significantly increases community household income.

The employment variation stays the same and so does the community household income.


S2.4A sound

environmentalguarantee for the localcommunity.

In forest utilization activities, the management unit

must care about the impact of technology to theenvironment, in terms of potential chemicalcontamination or air and noise pollution, etc. the unit

must at least demonstrate some effort to manage theimpact.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit takes into account the choices of technology utilization related to environmental impact and obtain asupportive environmental management activity.

The management unit takes into account the choices of technology utilization related to environmental impact but the environmentalmanagement is not well implemented.

The management unit does not take into account the choices of technology utilization related to environmental impact and has nosupporting environmental management activity.

S2.5

Assurance oncommunity healthstatus.

The management unit is expected to be responsible tothe community health status. The responsibility isdemonstrated in proactively increase the health quality

of the community, cooperation with health authorities,and accessibility of health facility in the management

unit.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The health of the community is assured and there are active efforts of the management unit in increasing health status of the

community.

There are efforts of the management unit in increasing community health status by providing health facilities without health service

financial support.

The health condition of the community is not assured and there are no efforts in bad health prevention by the unit.

S2.6

Public facility for localcommunity.

The management unit supports the structuring ofgeneral facilities as part of the social obligation to thecommunity. This program is planned and pays close

attention to problems and settlements within thecommunity, local necessities, and participating the

community in the planning and implementation of theprogram.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The general facility procurement program is prepared based on the problems and needs of the community; it is participatively

planned and implemented.

The general facility procurement program is prepared based on the regulations and guidance of a related government organization,without considering participative planning and implementation.

There is no planned general facility procurement preparation.

S2.7Functioning the

conflict managementprocess.

The presence of a management unit will affect the

social cultural life of a certain region. To control theeffects of its presence, the unit must develop a conflictmanagement system where conflict cases and

potentials are discussed, settled and managed. Theunit must perform the system and the procedureapproved and accepted by the community. The

procedure must consider the sense of fairness andbalance in the negotiation process. It must also be

open to all resolution alternatives, from tribe law, localconsensus to formal regulations.

Very Good

Good

Average

Bad

Very Bad

No significant conflict occurring between the management unit and the local community in effect of the conflict management function.

There are conflicts that are well managed through an agreed procedure.

There are conflicts that are well managed through corporate rules.

There are conflicts that are settled by the security officers.

There are on-going conflicts that are unsettled.


S2.8Creating andmaintaining

productivity of thelocal community.

The presence of the management unit is expected notonly submissively affect the economic lives but must

actively participate in developing communityeconomics. The unit’s activity in communitydevelopment is represented in various programs in

social administration frame.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit actively develops the community economics so that the local business productivity rises significantly.

The management unit actively develops the community economics but not so optimum in increasing local business productivity.

The presence of the management unit has no effect in community business productivity.

S2.9Substantial

management unitcontributions to theeconomic

development in themanagement unitarea.

Besides providing economic values to the community,

the presence of a management unit must also providean equal benefit to a wider extent. The contributioncan be in the form of retribution and/or tax for regional

development. Other contribution is a wider market inthe region surrounding the unit.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit fulfills the obligation to pay retribution/tax on time according to rules and significantly have a positive effect tothe domestic market in the region surrounding the unit.

The management unit fulfill the obligation to pay retribution/tax on time according to rules and but not yet significantly have a positiveeffect to the domestic market in the region surrounding the unit.

The management unit neglects the obligation to pay retribution/tax on time according to rules and its presents does not significantlyhave a positive effect on the domestic market in the region surrounding the unit.

S3.1

Safety and health ofworkers.

In running forest business, a management unit mustpay attention to the health and safety of workers suchas providing health assurance facility, work protection

instruments, regulations that provides assurance onwork safety, and first-aid facilities. Besides for

permanent workers, the protection of health and worksafety must also include daily and collective workers.

Very Good

Good

Bad

Very Bad

There is insurance in health and work safety, work protection/security system and instruments, a sufficient health service facility, and

low accident level.

There is insurance in health and work safety, work protection/security system and instruments but not utilized accordingly, a

sufficient health service facility, and low accident level.

There is insurance in health and work safety, work protection/security system and instruments but not utilized accordingly, aninsufficient health service facility, and low accident level.

No insurance in health and work safety, there is a work protection/security system and instruments but not utilized accordingly, aninsufficient health service facility, and high accident level.

S3.2Labor involvement in

contract arrangement.

As a part of the production unit, workers must be

involved from the beginning in understanding theirrights and obligations. This is represented inparticipating their representatives in the Labor Union in

the agreement arrangement process that explainstheir position, rights and obligations in a managementunit. This agreement is a statement of the rights and

obligations of workers and the management unit thatbinds the two parties and acts as a media to create

congenial industrial relations.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The employees are involved in establishing their work agreement from the beginning.

The employees are informed their rights and obligations at the beginning of their employment.

The employees are not involved in establishing their work agreement from the beginning and there are no clear information on their

rights and obligations.


S3.3

Assurance forfreedom of union.

As part of the workers’ right to articulate their opinions,the management unit provides freedom to unite in ademocratic, permanent, sustainable, independent

manner and formed voluntarily. The labor union will bea media for protecting and defending the rights andinterest of the workers.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit provides the freedom to form a union according to their initiative.

The management unit provides the freedom to form a union according to the existing government regulations.

The management unit forbids the employees to form a union.

S3.4

Facilities supportinglabor welfare.

The management unit must consider the workers ascompany asset. It should be represented in the

procurement of welfare facilities in the working areaand homes.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The management unit according to the standard of feasibility provides facilities for employees.

Facilities for employees are provided by the management unit but not considering the standard of feasibility.

The management unit does not provide facilities for employees.

S3.5Career improvement

opportunity for alllabor force.

The unit management provides an open career system

for all employees based on potential andachievements. The positions are based on evaluationof capability, in a clear and indiscriminating promotion

system.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

There is a clear and open career level system for employees according to their educational background, achievement, potential, andwork period.

There is a clear and open career level system for employees but only according to their educational background and workachievement.

There is no clear and open career level system for employees according to their achievement.

S3.6Enhancement of

education and skill forall labor force.

The management unit seriously conducts training and

skill development activities for all employees as part ofemployment capability and productivity improvementprogram. The program can be performed in the unit or

sending to another institution. The unit provides plansand procedures for all employees to have the same

opportunity.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

There are efforts in increasing education level and skill of employees on regular basis, which is open to all according to theirpotentials.

There are efforts in increasing education level and skill of employees but not on a regular basis.

There are no efforts in increasing education level and skill of employees.

S3.7Labor wage complywith local standard.

Pay and remuneration structure implemented by themanagement unit, for permanent, daily and collective

employees must meet local standards.

The amount of money received must be able to

provide sufficient living for the employee and thefamily according to local standard.

Very Good

Average

Very Bad

The employees’ pay rate meets the local standard of living.

The employees’ pay rate meets the minimum regional standard of living.

The employees’ pay rate does not meet the minimum regional standard of living.

Documents

INDICATORSCORE(INTENSITYSCALE) Sustainable Plantation Forest Management