Indianas Major Moves Projects Asphalt Pavement Association of
Indiana Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOE Commissioner INDOT December
13, 2012
Slide 2
Six district offices 3,630 employees 1,600 Highway Technicians
800 Managers/Supervisors 300 Engineers $389 million/annual
operating budget $1 billion/annual capital expenditures 28,400
total roadway lane miles 5,300 INDOT-owned bridges INDOT
Profile
Slide 3
Customer Satisfaction Survey Items that residents thought were
critical for INDOT.
Slide 4
Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction Levels with INDOTs
Performance Regarding Communication & Cooperation.
Slide 5
Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction levels with INDOTs
performance regarding communication & cooperation.
Slide 6
2012 INDOT Awards MonthOrganization / AwardProject/Program
FebruaryAASHTO / Project of the WeekSherman Minton Bridge AugustITE
/ Public Agency Achievement AwardNew Management Philosophy &
Strategy September Council of State Community Development Agencies
(COSCDA) / Presidential Award for InnovationStellar Communities
OctoberAASHTO / Performance Excellence AwardDamageWise
OctoberAASHTO / Performance Excellence Award Gold AwardPropane
Vehicle Program OctoberPopular Science Magazine / 25 th Annual Best
of Whats NewMilton-Madison Bridge Project October Construction
Management Association of America (CMAA) / CMAA AwardSherman Minton
Bridge OctoberCG/LA / Strategic Project of the YearOhio River
Bridges - East End Crossing NovemberACEC / Engineering Excellence
Award Honor AwardI-69 Sections 2-3
Slide 7
INDOT Investment FY 2006-15
Slide 8
Interstate Truck Trends
Slide 9
Pavement & Bridge Preservation
Slide 10
Major Moves Projects Project Miles % Miles Let Est. $ CN Cost
(m) Final Letting Open to Traffic I-80/94 Interchange-100$197 2009
Aug. 2011 Accelerate 46511100$423 2010 Dec. 2012 US 24 Fort to
Port11100$93 2010 Nov. 2012 I-69 Evansville to
Crane67100$6202011Nov. 2012 Milton-Madison Bridge1100$104 2010
April 2013 US 31 Kokomo13100$155 May 2012 Dec. 2013 SR 25 Hoosier
Heartland36100$327 July 2012 Dec. 2013 US 31 Plymouth to South
Bend2092$223 April 2013 Dec. 2014 I-69 Crane to
Bloomington2779$400March 2013Dec. 2014 US 31 Hamilton
County1316$320Spring 2013Dec. 2015 Total 199 $2.9B
Slide 11
Hoosier Heartland (SR 25) 36 miles Ribbon cuttings: Oct. 24,
2012: 12 miles I-65 to US 421 December 2013: 24 miles US 421 to US
24 Open to traffic: Dec. 2013 CN Cost: $327 million Major Moves
Ribbon Cutting Hoosier Heartland at Clymers, Cass County.
Slide 12
Fort to Port (US 24) 11 miles Open to traffic: Nov. 14, 2012 CN
Cost: $93 million Major Moves Ribbon Cutting US 24/Fort to Port at
Webster Road, Allen County.
Slide 13
Interstate 69 Sections 1-3: 67 miles Evansville to Crane Open
to traffic: Nov. 19, 2012 CN Cost: $620 million Major Moves Ribbon
Cutting I-69, Daviess County.
Slide 14
US 31 Hamilton County 13 miles 16% let Final letting: Spring
2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2015 CN Cost: $320 million US 31 at SR
38, Hamilton County. Major Moves
Slide 15
Interstate 69 Section 4: 27 miles Crane to Bloomington 79% let
Bid openings: Segment 3: Dec. 12, 2012 Segment 2: March 2013 Open
to traffic: Dec. 2014 Est. CN Cost: $400 million Major Moves
Slide 16
Interstate 69 Section 5: 21 miles Bloomington to Martinsville
DEIS published: Oct. 26, 2012 RFI issued: Dec. 4, 2012 Public
hearing: Dec. 6, 2012 ROD anticipated: Spring 2013 Construction to
start: FY 2014 Est. CN Cost: $350 million Major Moves
Slide 17
Total Cost: $2.6 billion Federal ROD approval: June 20, 2012
Kentucky: Downtown Crossing Indiana: East End Crossing East End
Groundbreaking: Aug. 30, 2012 Public Hearing: Dec. 1, 2012 IFA
Determination: Dec. 3, 2012 Open to Traffic: October 2016 P3
Projects - Ohio River Bridges
Slide 18
P3 Projects - East End Crossing Indiana Sections
Slide 19
48 miles from I-55 to I-65 Tolled expressway Environmental
Impact Study Preferred Route B3 announced Oct. 18, 2012 Tier One
ROD anticipated in January 2013 Tier Two ROD anticipated in July
2014 P3 Projects - Illiana Corridor
Slide 20
Pavement Conditions Pavement Condition Ratings are measured by
Road Roughness, using the International Roughness Index (IRI). In
2011, 3,060 of INDOTs Lane Miles were in Fair or Poor Condition. If
Preservation Spending Levels Remain Constant, it is Estimated that
4,445 Lane Miles will be Rated Fair or Poor by 2022, an Increase of
1,385 Miles (45%). 16 Projected
Slide 21
Federal Highway Bill (MAP-21) Indiana Impact: FY 2013: $923M FY
2014: $931M Effective Date: October 1, 2012 Increased TIFIA program
Increased tolling ability for new & added capacity projects New
performance measures & asset management requirements
Slide 22
Pavement Selection Process Based on appropriate pavement
treatment design Existing pavement type, thickness & distress
level Ability of possible solutions to address the problem,
situation or pavement distresses present Near-term and long-term
cost effectiveness Construction costs Least cost of ownership Right
treatment, right time, right cost Engineering feasibility 1&1/2
resurface vs. 8 resurface vs. reconstruct, etc. Business case
suitability Interstate vs. minor state highway Budgetary impacts
acceptability
Slide 23
Pavement Selection Process Considers not just HMA or PCCP, but
also possible & feasible treatment levels of intensity Basic
levels of intensity are: Routine or preventive maintenance Surface
treatment Chip-seal, PPI, mill-&-fill, etc. Minor structural
treatment 2-lift overlay Major structural treatment Rubberize,
thick HMA or PCCP overlay Pavement construction or replacement
Slide 24
Pavement Peer Group Pavement Steering Committee Successor
District pavement engineers & pavement area engineers are
pavement owners Everyone else works to support them Forum for broad
discussion of pavement issues so pavement owners can make decisions
To include agency, engineering consultants, construction industry,
etc.
Slide 25
Chapter 304 Revisions Incorporate new agency pavement
organization, i.e., district pavement engineers, pavement area
engineers, etc. Incorporate new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement
Design Guide (MEPDG) philosophy & methodology (Darwin M-E
software) More clearly delineate pavement treatment, selection
expectations for internal & external designers Reflect increase
reliance on pavement design engineers professional judgment
Slide 26
Alternate Bidding HMA & PCCP options considered Best
results when alternate pavement type considerations determined
early in project development 9% (+/-) construction savings
typically No longer FHWA experiment, Pavement Selection Process
Continued discussion on lower limit Future looking into alternate
treatments at PPI level?
