115
ISSN 0019-5723 INDIAN LABOUR JOURNAL (A MONTHLY PUBLICATION) Volume 55 August 2014 No. 8 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT LABOUR BUREAU SHIMLA/CHANDIGARH

INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

ISSN 0019-5723

INDIAN LABOUR JOURNAL (A MONTHLY PUBLICATION)

Volume 55 August 2014 No. 8

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

LABOUR BUREAU

SHIMLA/CHANDIGARH

Page 2: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

EDITORIAL COMMITTEE

Chairman Daljeet Singh

Editor I.S.Negi

Associate Editor R.C.Jarial

Staff Writers

Laxmi Kant

Ravinder Kumar

NOTE TO CONTRIBUTORS

Non-controversial articles on labour matters of topical interest (e.g. labour and

wage policy; industrial relations; industrial management; trade union movement; labour

welfare; workers‟ participation in management; employment/ unemployment; labour

research of empirical value and of general interest etc.) are accepted for publication in

the Journal. The articles generally not exceeding ten thousand words may be sent in a

floppy diskette of 3.5” or C.D in Microsoft Word only with a print out in double space

on one side foolscap paper, addressed to the Director General, Labour Bureau,

„Cleremont‟, Shimla -171 004 alongwith a declaration by the author that the article has

neither been published nor submitted for publication elsewhere. All references and

footnotes, may be given only at the end of the articles.

Authors are solely responsible for the factual accuracy and the opinion

expressed in their signed articles. The Labour Bureau, however, reserves the right to

edit, amend and delete any portion of the article with a view to make it more

presentable and to reject any article, if not found suitable. The articles which are

rejected will not be returned and no correspondence will be entertained on the articles

which are rejected by the Editorial Committee.

A copy of the Journal, in which the article appears, is supplied to the author.

An honorarium up to Rs. 1,000 is also payable as per rules for each article published.

Our address: The Director General, Labour Bureau ‘Cleremont’, Shimla 171 004

Fax No: 0177-2655253 Website: http://labourbureau.nic.in E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

Page 3: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

PREFACE

“The Indian Labour Journal” earlier known as “Indian Labour Gazette” is a monthly publication being brought out since July, 1943. This publication is the only official publication of its kind in the country disseminating latest labour statistics and research in the field of labour which has immense utility for diverse stakeholders such as Employers‟ and Employees‟ Organizations, Research Scholars, Central and State Governments, Autonomous Bodies, Courts, Universities etc.

The Journal normally contains matters of interest on labour such as Labour Activities, News about Indian & Foreign Labour, Labour Decisions, Labour Literature and Labour Statistics. But, at times, non controversial articles on labour matters of topical interest and the gist of the Reports, Enquiries & Studies conducted by Labour Bureau are also published.

Suggestions for further improvement of the publication are welcome.

DALJEET SINGH

DIRECTOR GENERAL

LABOUR BUREAU,

SHIMLA-171004

Page 4: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous
Page 5: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

INDIAN LABOUR JOURNAL

Published Monthly by

LABOUR BUREAU SHIMLA/CHANDIGARH

(First Published in July, 1943 as Indian Labour Gazette)

Vol.55 August, 2014 No 8

CONTENTS Page

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Sample size for the fresh Working Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey under

CPI (IW) - New Series

817

LABOUR ACTIVITIES

Labour Situation 832

Industrial Disputes 834

NEWS IN BRIEF

(a) INDIAN LABOUR

Rural Ministry Takes Steps for Timely Payment under Jobs Scheme 836

Govt Working towards Liberalising Labour Laws to Boost Factory Jobs 836

Employee Productivity Takes a Hit in FY14 837

Labour Ministry to Roll Out Revamped Vocational Courses 837

Now, Get Job-ready with Red-hot Skills 837

States Call for Watch on Labour Conditions Abroad 838

Industries/Services declared Public Utility Services under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 838

Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers 839

Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers 839

( b) FOREIGN LABOUR

More than 70 Per Cent of the World Population Lacks Proper Social Protection 840

Euro Zone Stumbles after China Surges 840

Fewest Americans Filed Jobless Claims in May Since 2007 840

IMF Cuts US Growth Outlook, Says Full Employment Years Off 841

Decent Jobs for Youth are Essential to the Future We Want 841

Indian Workers Stranded as Employer Retains Passports 841

LABOUR DECISIONS

Basic Wage would Mean the Wage which is Universally, Necessarily and Ordinarily Paid

to all the Employees Across the Board

842

Page 6: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

816

LABOUR LITERATURE

Important Articles of Labour Interest Published in the Periodicals Received in the Labour

Bureau

843

STATISTICS

Section A- Monthly Statistics 847

Section B- Serial Statistics 891

ANY REPRODUCTION FROM THE JOURNAL SHOULD BE SUITABLY ACKNOWLEDGED

Subscription and complaints, if any, regarding the distribution of the Indian

Labour Journal should be sent only to

THE CONTROLLER OF PUBLICATIONS, CIVIL LINES, DELHI 110054

Pre-payable subscription rates for the Indian Labour Journal

Annual Rate of Subscription Rs.960.00

Sale per copy Rs. 80.00

Page 7: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

817

SPECIAL ARTICLE*

Sample size for the fresh Working Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey

under CPI (IW) - New Series

“The sample size and sample selection methods for both outlets and the goods and

services for which price movements over time are to be observed should ensure that the prices

collected are representative and sufficient to meet the requirements for the accuracy of the index,

but also that the collection process is cost-effective.” ……………… The ILO resolution

concerning CPI.

1. Introduction: The Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers [CPI-(IW)] is

constructed from several sample-based sources. It is an estimate based on a sample of families to

estimate weights, and a sample of centres within regions (State/UT), a sample of outlets, a

sample of goods and services (index basket) and a sample of time periods for price observation.

1.2. There are two essential constituents of CPI (IW) namely; weighting

diagram/expenditure weights and retail prices. Expenditure weights are used to determine the

relative importance of the goods and services tracked in the index. The expenditure weights

assigned to the individual items in the basket represent direct expenditure on those goods and

services. But they also represent expenditure on similar goods and services not explicitly

included in the basket but expected to exhibit similar price change.

1.3. The primary source for establishing CPI weights at the basic item level is Working

Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey (WCFI&ES). It may also be the most

comprehensive source of combined (working class) family income and expenditure data

produced by the statistical system. Source for data on weights is a working class family while for

prices is an outlet. The existing WCFI&ES–weighted CPI (IW) is 2001 based and reflects an

average of results derived from the income and expenditure surveys for 1999 through 2000 in

respect of 78 industrially important centres. The relative importance of major CPI (IW)

categories is summarized in the following table:

Sub-Group/

Group Sr. No.

Expenditure Category (Sub-

group/Group) Relative Importance

Food Sub Groups

a) Cereals and products 13.48

b) Pulses and products 2.91

c) Edible oils 3.23

d) Meat, Fish & Egg 3.97

e) Milk and Milk Product 7.31

f) Condiments & Spices 2.57

g) Vegetables and fruits 6.05

h) Other food 6.68

* This paper was prepared by CPI (IW)-New Series Section of Labour Bureau, Chandigarh.

Page 8: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

818

Sub-Group/

Group Sr. No.

Expenditure Category (Sub-

group/Group) Relative Importance

I A Food and beverages 46.20

Pan, tobacco and intoxicants 2.27

I B Food, beverages and

intoxicants 48.47

II Fuel and light 6.43

III Housing 15.27

IV Clothing, bedding and

footwear 6.57

Miscellaneous Sub Groups

a) Medical Care 4.56

b) Education and recreation 6.18

c) Transport and Communication 4.87

d) Personal care & effects 4.22

e) Household requisites and

others 3.43

V Miscellaneous 23.26

All Groups 100

1.4. The base expenditure weights remain the same between major market basket revisions. Therefore, it seems natural to view an index with a more recent base period as being more representative of price movements in what consumers are purchasing currently & this argues for more frequent updating. 1.5. Keeping in view the above requirement of maintaining the representative character of the index, as endorsed by ILO & various Commissions/Committees, Labour Bureau has initiated the base revision exercise which would entail, inter alia, updation of all sample based components entering into the index. The foremost step is ascertaining extent and content of coverage:

Selecting industrially representative/important areas (centres) throughout the country in which WCFI&ES is to be carried out for generation of weights & recurring collection of prices will be done for compiling indices; and

Identifying industrial sectors which would form basis to define & cover the target population.

1.6. With the accord of approval on the proposed list of 88 centres and seven sectors to be covered in the new series by the Group of Technical Advisory Committee on Statistics of Prices and Cost of Living (TAC on SPCL) – the apex advisory body on price indices in India functioning under M/O Statistics & Programme Implementation - in its first meeting held on 22

nd October 2013, the stage is formally over (Annexure I). The approved centres cover

approximately 60% (82lakh workers) of the total industrial employment of manual workers in seven sectors. 2. After arriving at the basic decisions about nature & scope of the new series, as per established practice, a fresh “Working Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey (WCFI&ES)” will be undertaken for generating CPI weights at the basic item level. For this purpose, the preliminary issue that comes to fore is determination of size of the sample survey. The importance of sample size to the entire operation of a survey is widely acknowledged fact in any large scale sample survey. Not only is it important in terms of how many households/

Page 9: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

819

families are interviewed but how many interviewers are engaged, how big the workload is for each interviewer, etc. It also assumes importance in view of the high respondent/interviewer load in respect of WCFI&ES schedule, being multidimensional in nature. The factors and parameters that may be considered in determining the sample size are many but in the instant case they revolve chiefly around the Index Review Committee (hereinafter IRC) recommendations & existing methodology. 3. IRC on estimation of sample size: The Chadha Committee, formally the Index Review Committee (IRC), which was appointed to review the current series for effecting overall improvements submitted its report in March, 2009 and represents the latest extensive evaluation of the price indices. Labour Bureau, M/O Labour & Employment has accepted its recommendations. The Committee reviewed the existing procedure for determination of sample size and went on to recommend as following:

“The Committee desired that the sampling fraction should at least be around 1% to give adequate representation to the total population of industrial workers, so that the true consumption pattern of the targeted population is realistically captured. The Committee also decided that sample size of the next survey to be conducted in 2011 should also be worked out on the basis of data available from the previous Working Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey conducted during the period 1999-2000.” (Para 3.10.4) IRC Report - 2009. Therefore, the Committee, while endorsing the existing procedure sought to adjust the sample size so as to make sampling fraction around 1% at the respective centre.

4. Existing methodology: The existing procedure considers the variability in consumption pattern in a centre and the precision required in respect of the weights to be derived for use in compilation of index numbers along with the manageability of the workload by the field staff. 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:-

(i) Centres Common with the previous WCFI&ES

(ii) New Centres. For the common centres, sample size was arrived at by using the Co-efficient of Variation (hereinafter CV) of sub-sample indices of 36 months for each centre and compared with the precision envisaged for the survey viz. 2 per cent. The coefficient of variation is a dimensionless number that quantifies the degree of variability relative to the mean and is calculated as standard deviation divided by the expected/average value of the given characteristic. In case the average value of 36 months CV was greater than 2, then the sample size was determined by multiplying sample size of previous WCFI&E surveys by (CV)

2/4 restricting it to twofold of previous

survey. But where CV was less than or equal to 2, the sample size of the previous survey was retained. 4.3. The sample size for each of the new centres was fixed after taking into consideration the working class population in these centres and the variability observed at similar/neighboring centres. The minimum sample size for a centre was fixed at 216 for family budget enquiry and 84 for house rent survey for operational convenience. The sample sizes for other centres were adjusted to multiples of 216 and 84 respectively to achieve equitable distribution of work amongst field Investigators. 4.4. The expenditure pattern which form the principal subject of study in working class family income & expenditure survey are subject to seasonal fluctuations. To eliminate the seasonal effects from the results, it was necessary either to survey the same set of sampled families over a complete cycle of seasons through repeated visits or to spread the sampled families uniformly over the seasons in a randomized manner. The latter method had been adopted in the previous studies, as it facilitated covering a larger sample for the same cost which was expected to provide greater precision in the results. The surveys had thus been spread over a year by staggering the sample of families uniformly over the period of 12 months. The rate of

Page 10: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

820

canvassing in each centre was kept as 18 families for Family Budget Enquiry and 7 for House Rent Survey per month. This number was fixed keeping in view the work load at the level of Assistant Superintendent/Investigator. For operational convenience, a sub‐sample of families covered for Family Budget Enquiry was selected for House Rent Survey. Care was, however, taken that no available sector of employment in a centre remained unrepresented in House Rent Survey. Following the mentioned methodology, in the 1999‐2000 survey a sample of 41,040 working class families was covered in 78 centres and the sample size in different centres varied from 216 to 3,024 families. 5. Sample size for proposed WCFI&ES: As noted above, the IRC, while endorsing the existing methodology, envisaged “adequate representation” by keeping the sampling fraction around 1% of the total industrial employment of the respective centre. Thus, concordance with IRC recommendation requires that the sample size computed by following the existing methodology may be adjusted upward (if required so) - to the nearest multiple of 216 – so that sampling fraction at each centre must be around 1% of the total industrial employment of the centre. So the final sample size should take into account the variability in consumption pattern as well as keeping the sampling fraction at 1% level whichever is greater for having a conservative value. However, the requirement to keep sampling fraction around 1% alone puts the total sample size at all India level for the proposed WCFI&E survey at approximately 82,000 working class families as identified through the manual workers - almost double the sample size that was covered in the previous survey. 5.2. The staggeringly enhanced sample size, a 100% increase, consequential of specific IRC recommendation is, however, neither required from the point of view of sampling precision nor feasible from the point of view of practical application (resources, time constraints, manageability etc.) as discussed in the following paragraphs:

It is well known that sample size determination depends, critically, on the desired degree of precision for key estimate. The more precise or reliable survey estimates must be, the bigger the sample size must be. However, for a given precision level, sample size doesn‟t depend on the size of the target population itself, except when it is a significant percentage, say 5% or greater of the target population (rarely the case in a large scale survey).

It is hard to ascertain the impact of any increase in sample size on the precision due to maintaining the sampling fraction around 1%. Likewise, it may not be possible to anticipate by what measures the existing scientific methodology may fail to secure adequate representation, if it yields sample size less than 1% of sampling fraction even though conforming to the precision requirements.

It may be well appreciated that scale of a survey is more than just a matter of its sample

size. It is more than, and includes, the size of the sample. It increases according to the complexity and volume of the information collected per case, how sensitive and burdensome the information collected is for the respondent (and for the interviewer), how complex and demanding survey operations are, etc. In this respect, Income & Expenditure survey interview schedule is especially quite challenging due to sheer number of questions that require a great deal of recall and sufficient probing on small and unremarkable expenditure. The need for a great amount of detailed data with the need to ensure that respondent report those data completely & accurately require hardly any emphasis and this phenomenon may deteriorate the quality of data, if overlooked.

It is important to recognize that high precision may be achieved from large and

otherwise well-designed samples, while accuracy can only be achieved if both sampling error and non-sampling error are minimized / reduced. This implies that a precise design may nevertheless be highly inaccurate if it has a large non-sampling error and it makes little sense to pursue more precise estimates of a biased measure. On such a enormous (& undesirable) scale, synchronizing various activities relating to survey operation with limited resources and compressed time frame on various interfaces would be difficult in circumventing the proliferation of non-sampling errors. The

Page 11: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

821

emphasis therefore has to be on data quality and control of non-sampling errors, rather than on high sampling precision and a large sample size.

5.3. These factors clearly dictate the need to follow the existing methodology for determination of sample size while achieving balance between statistical and practical considerations. The detailed steps followed for determining the sample size are as follows:

a) For determination of sample size, centres are classified into following categories:-

(i) Centres Common with the previous WCFI&ES

(ii) New Centres

(iii) Centres identified for experimental coverage of Handloom & Construction sectors for additional allocation of samples

b) For common centres, computation of sample size primarily rests on computation of sub-sample wise indices for working out CV‟s. Further, the computation of sub-sample wise indices requires derivation of sub-sample wise weights. With this in view, item/sub-group/group level weights for each sub-sample of the common centres have been prepared on the basis of expenditure data relating to 1999-2000 survey.

c) Sub – sample wise CPI (IW) indices are constructed in a hierarchical manner in several stages – sub group, group and general (all combined) - by employing Laspeyres‟ base – weighted (expenditure weights) price relatives formula as has been used in the previous/ current series. In the first stage, the centre wise price - relative of each item in a sub group/group is multiplied by its corresponding sub group/group weight in each subsample and the sum of products for all items is divided by sum of their weights (100, as the weights are expressed as proportionate expenditure totaling to 100). The resultant figure is sub group/group index. In the next stage, group indices are derived for the Food and Miscellaneous groups from their sub group indices by multiplying the latter by their weights within the relevant groups and dividing the sum of products by the total of sub group weights (i.e. 100 in each case). The group indices which are derived for a month are combined into the “general” index by using the group weights in turn.

d) Thus, using sub sample wise weights Laspeyres CPI indices have been generated for

each sub sample in respect of each of the common centres and for a given month “cross-sectional” CV estimate has been computed. Because of the fact that heterogeneous monthly results might occur as the variability of pricing behavior is monthly dependent, these cross-sectional CV estimates have been averaged over the period of 36 months for the calendar years 2010, 2011 & 2012. By keeping fixed the precision level at 2% for new series as well, in case the average value of 36 months CV is greater than 2, then the sample size is determined by multiplying sample size of previous WCFI&E survey by (CV)

2/4 restricting it to twofold of previous survey. But

where CV is less than or equal to 2, the sample size of the previous survey has been retained.

e) The minimum sample size for a centre is proposed to be kept fixed at 84 for house rent survey and 216 for family budget enquiry [@ 7 and 18 per month] for operational convenience as has been done in the previous WCFI&ES. Accordingly, the sample sizes for other centres are adjusted to multiples of 216 and 84 respectively to achieve equitable distribution of work amongst field Investigators.

f) The average CV in respect of following 12 centres out of 65 common centres has crossed the 2% level and accordingly the sample size for these centres has been either proportionately adjusted or restricted to twofold level as the case may be.

Page 12: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

822

COMMON CENTRES WHERE AVERAGE CV CROSSED 2% LEVEL

Sl.

No.

Name of the

centre

Average

C. V. for

the 36

Month

(C.V.)2/4 Sample

Size in old

WCFI&ES

(1999-

2000)

(Col 4)*

(Col 5)

Sample size for

proposed

WCFI&ES

For

Schedule

'A'

(Family

Budget

Enquiry)

For

Schedule

'B1'

(House

Rent

Survey)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Ghaziabad /G.B.Nagar

2.04 1.04 216 225 432 168

2 Warangal 2.15 1.16 216 250 432 168

3 Bhavnagar 2.19 1.20 432 518 648 252

4 Puducherry 2.26 1.28 216 276 432 168

5 Bhilwara 2.29 1.31 432 566 648 252

6 Jamshedpur 2.51 1.58 1296 2041 1944 756

7 Jabalpur 2.61 1.70 432 736 864 336

8 Chindwara (M) 2.76 1.90 432 823 864 336

9 Kanpur 3.06 2.34 648 1517 1296 504

10 Durgapur 3.79 3.59 864 3103 1728 672

11 Amritsar 3.89 3.78 432 1634 864 336

12 Vishakhapatnam 4.21 4.43 216 957 432 168

It may be noted that except for Jamshedpur; in all the centres the computed sample size

(Col. 6) has been rounded upward to the nearest multiple of 216 according to the envisaged

workload per investigator. In respect of Jamshedpur centre the next multiple of computed sample

size of 2041 (Col.6) comes to 2160 resulting in 10 sub-samples, therefore in view of operational

constraints the sample size for the centre is proposed to be kept at 1944 thereby reducing one

sub-sample.

g) The sample size for each of the new centres has been fixed after taking into consideration

comparability of (i) the variability observed at neighboring/ similar centres and (ii) size of

employment of industrial workers.

h) Following the aforementioned criterion, the sample size has been estimated for all the 88

centres selected for the proposed survey as detailed in Annexure II. For each of the new

centres, the estimated sample size is reported in Annexure III.

i) Sample size for experimental coverage of Handloom & Construction sectors: A

decision has been taken that Labour Bureau shall cover both Construction and Handloom

sectors on pilot/experimental basis in the new series. Two centres from each Handloom &

Construction sector shall be covered separately without forming the part of all-India series.

Accordingly following centres have been identified implicitly for the purpose:

Page 13: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

823

Sl. No. Centre Sector Region

1 Guwahati Handloom Eastern India

2 Salem Handloom Southern India

3 Mumbai Construction Western India

4 Ghaziabad/G.B.Nagar Construction Northern India

The expertise gained during the pilot exercise would facilitate decision making for inclusion of these two sectors in the subsequent series.

However, following features are noteworthy in these sectors;

Lack of sources for reliable data on sector wise & centre wise employment size

Lack of relevant legislation in respect of Handloom sector

Relatively low and disperse size of handloom units

Variegated nature of construction activities

These factors in sum put a need that Handloom & Construction sectors may be treated

as independent entity – separate from existing seven sectors – for sampling purposes.

Accordingly, a separate criterion of stratum formation may be adopted for the

workers/establishments falling in these two sectors in each of the four centres after identification

of centre boundary during the preliminary survey in consultation with respective State/UT

governments and the selection of sample in these two sectors in each of the four centres may be

designed separately in the form of independent sub‐samples. In absence of auxiliary information

on size of respective employment, an additional sample of size 216 for family budget enquiry

(and 84 for house rent survey @ 7 per 18 per month) is proposed uniformly in each of these four

centres for experimental coverage of Handloom & Construction sectors. This may reliably

facilitate explicit comparison of consumption behavior of working class families in the

Handloom & Construction sectors with the working class families of existing seven sectors as

noted in the following:

Due to practical considerations sample are to be added in the multiples of 216; equaling an investigator‟s workload.

Workers/working class families belonging to an individual sector – predominant sector

(either Handloom or construction) in a centre - would be less heterogeneous than the workers/working class families of the existing seven sectors as a whole and therefore may require smaller sample for the same precision & accuracy of sector wise expenditure weights.

The additional sample of 216 (for experimental weights) precisely equals the proposed

sample size for Ghaziabad, Salem and Guwahati centres (for general weights) to be covered in the new survey. For Mumbai centre the additional sample of 216 (for experimental weights) is one fifth and one half of the proposed sample size (for general weights) for Mumbai & nearby Thane centres respectively to be covered in the new series.

Page 14: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

824

6. CONCLUSION: This paper proposes sample size for undertaking fresh Working Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey in respect of centres to be covered in the new CPI (IW) series as displayed in Annexure II & III. State/UT wise coverage of samples is reported in Annexure IV. The paper also puts forth rationale for an additional coverage of sample of size 216 uniformly for generating experimental weights for Handloom & Construction sectors in Ghaziabad, Salem, Guwahati & Mumbai centres. In the fresh Working Class Family Income & Expenditure Survey, in sum 48,384 (plus 864 additional coverage for Handloom & Construction sectors) working class families are proposed to be covered in 88 centres at all India level as against sample coverage of 41,040 working class families in 78 centres during 1999-2000 survey. This is approximately 17% increase in the sample coverage and corresponds to almost identical increase (15%) in the employment size in the existing seven sectors as has been observed from the previous survey. For the proposed survey sample size in different centres varies from 216 to 3,024 working class families.

The paper has already been submitted to Standing Tripartite Committee (STC). It is pertinent to mention here that pursuant to one of the crucial IRC recommendation on consultation with Index users, the M/O Labour & Employment vide its order no. Y-12011/5/2010-ESA (LB) dated 12

th January 2011 has constituted a Standing Tripartite

Committee to advise on issues pertaining to base updation exercise & to widen consultation base with stakeholders with the following composition and terms of reference: Chairman Principal Labour & Employment Advisor, M/O Labour & Employment Member

i. Two members representing Central Trade Unions‟

ii. Two members representing Employers‟ Organizations

iii. Independent member (one)/Academic Representative (one)

iv. Representative of Women‟s Organization

v. State representatives (Three members)

vi. Central Government Representatives (Three members)

vii. M/O Labour & Employment (Two members) Terms of Reference:

i. To examine the various aspects of the base year revision of CPI (IW) including the selection of centers, sample size, sampling design, methodology for deriving the weighting diagram and linking factor;

ii. Examine the method of price collection procedures and machinery of price collection; iii. Examine the centre specific weighting diagrams for all the centres, selection of base

year, compilation of base year prices, trial indices and

iv. Consider any other relevant issue(s)/matter as may be necessary

The first meeting of Standing Tripartite Committee on coverage of sectors and selection of centers in the new CPI (IW) series was held in Shram Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi on 2

nd July

2013. The issue of expansion of coverage of sectors to Handloom & Construction sectors in accordance with the IRC recommendations, as noted above, was also discussed. The second meeting of STC was held on 24

th Feb 2014 at M/O Labour & Employment, New Delhi to

deliberate on the issue of ascertaining the sample size for fresh income & expenditure survey under the new series. The STC concurred to the proposed sample coverage as described in this paper. Consequent upon STC approval, the sample size as proposed would be placed before Group of TAC on SPCL shortly for obtaining final approval.

Page 15: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

825

Annexure-I

Statement Showing List of Proposed Centres for Working Class Family Income and

Expenditure Survey 2013-14=100

Sl. No

State/U.T Name of Centre Proposed for New CPI-IW

New Centre for 1st

time Dropped Centre

1 2 3 4 5 1. ANDHRA

PRADESH 1. Hyderabad 2. Vishakhapatnam 3. Warrangal 4. Manchiryal(M) 5. Nellore 6. Guntur

1. Manchiryal(M) 2. Nellore

1.Godavarikhani 2.Vijaywada

2. ASSAM 7. Doom-Dooma-Tinsukia(P)

8. Labac Silchar(P) 9. Sibsagar(P) 10. Numaligarh -

Golaghat(P) 11. Biswanath

Chariali(P) 12. Guwahati

3. Sibsagar(P) 4. Numaligarh(P) 5. Biswanath

Chariali(P)

3.Mariani- Jorhat 4.Rangapara

3. BIHAR 13. Patna 14. Monghyr-Jamalpur

6. Patna

4. GOA 15. Goa 5. GUJARAT 16. Surat

17. Ahmedabad 18. Vadodara 19. Rajkot 20. Bhavnagar

6. HARYANA 21. Faridabad 22. Gurgaon 23. Yamunanagar

7. Gurgaon

7. HIMACHAL PRADESH

24. Himachal Pradesh

8. KARNATAKA 25. Bangalore 26. Belgaum 27. Mysore 28. Hubli-Dharwad 29. Mercara- Kodagu(P) 30. Davanagere 31. Gulbarga(P)

8. Davanagere 9. Gulbarga(P)

9. KERALA 32. Idukki(P) 33. Kollam 34. Ernakulam/Alwaye

10. Idukki 5. Mundakyam-Kottayam

10. MADHYA PRADESH

35. Jabalpur 36. Indore 37. Bhopal 38. Chindwara(M)

11. MAHARASHTRA 39. Mumbai 40. Thane 41. Pune 42. Nagpur 43. Sholapur 44. Nasik

11. Thane

12. ORISSA 45. Cuttak 46. Keonjhar(M) 47. Angul-Tilchar

12. Cuttak 13. Keonjhar(M)

6. Rourkela

Page 16: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

826

Sl. No

State/U.T Name of Centre Proposed for New CPI-IW

New Centre for 1st

time Dropped Centre

13. PONDICHERRY 48. Puducherry 14. PUNJAB 49. Amritsar

50. Ludhiana 51. Jallandhar 52. Sangrur

14. Sangrur

15. RAJASTHAN 53. Jaipur 54. Alwar 55. Bhilwara

15. Alwar

7.Ajmer

16. TAMIL NADU 56. Coimbatore 57. Salem 58. Virudhu Nagar 59. Chennai 60. Madurai 61. Triunelveli(M) 62. Conoor (P)

16. Virudhu Nagar 17. Trirunelvelli

8.Tiruchirapally

17. TRIPURA 63. Tripura (P) 18. UTTAR

PRADESH 64. Ghaziabad/G.B.Nagar 65. Varanasi 66. Kanpur 67. Lucknow 68. Agra

19. WEST BENGAL 69. Kolkata 70. Haldia 71. Durgapur 72. Raniganj(M) 73. Jalpaiguri(P) 74. Darjeeling(P) 75. Howrah

9. Asansol 10.Siliguri

20. JHARKHAND 76. Bokaro 77. Dhanbad-Jharia(M) 78. Jamshedpur 79. Ramgarh(M)

18. Ramgarh

11.Giridih 12.Koderma 13.Ranchi-Hatia

21. CHATTISGARH 80. Raipur

81. Koriya(M) 82. Bhilai

19. Raipur 20. Koriya

22. DELHI 83. Delhi 23. UTTRAKHAND 84. Udham Singh Nagar 21. Udham Singh

Nagar

24. DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI

85. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 22. Dadra & Nagar Haveli

25. CHANDIGARH 86. Chandigarh 26. MEGHALAYA 87. Shillong 23. Shillong 27. JAMMU &

KASHMIR 88. Jammu & Kashmir

Common Centres: 65

New Centres: 23

Dropped Centres: 13

Page 17: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

827

Annexure - II

Sample Size for the proposed WCFI&ES in respect of all Centres

Sl. No

Nam

e o

f th

e S

tate

Nam

e o

f th

e ce

ntr

e

Sam

ple

Siz

e in

pre

vio

us

WC

FI&

ES

(1

99

9-2

00

0)

Av

erag

e

C.

V. fo

r th

e 36

Mo

nth

s

Sample size for Proposed WCFI&ES

No

.of

Inv

esti

gat

ors

(@ 2

16

Sch

edu

les

per

inv

esti

gat

or)

Nei

gh

bo

uri

ng /

Sim

ilar

Cen

tre

Fo

r S

ched

ule

'A'

(Fam

ily

Bud

get

Enq

uir

y)

Fo

r S

ched

ule

'B1' (

Ho

use

Ren

t S

urv

ey)

(@

84

/216

of

Fam

ily B

ud

get

En

qu

iry

S

ched

ule

)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 ANDHRA PRADESH

1 Hyderabad 1296 1.07 1296 504 6 -

2 Vishakhapatnam 216 4.21 432 168 2 - 3 Warrangal 216 2.15 432 168 2 - 4 Manchiryal(M)* - - 432 168 2 Warrangal 5 Nellore* - - 216 84 1 Guntur 6 Guntur 216 1.28 216 84 1 -

2 ASSAM 7 Doom-Dooma-Tinsukia(P)

432 0.98 432 168 2 -

8 Labac-Silchar(P) 864 1.05 864 336 4 - 9 Sibsagar(P) * - - 432 168 2 Doom-

Dooma-Tinsukia(P)

10 Numaligarh- Golaghat(P) *

- - 432 168 2

11 Biswanath Chariali(P)- Sonitpur *

- - 432 168 2

12 Guwahati 216 0.48 216 84 1 - 3 BIHAR 13 Patna * - - 864 336 4 Monghyr-

Jamalpur 14 Monghyr-Jamalpur 432 1.45 432 168 2 -

4 CHANDIGARH 15 Chandigarh 216 0.65 216 84 1 - 5 CHATTISGARH 16 Raipur * - - 864 336 4 Bhilai

17 Korba(M) * - - 432 168 2 Bhilai

18 Bhilai 432 1.27 432 168 2 - 6 DADRA &

NAGAR HAVELI

19 Dadra & Nagar Haveli *

- - 216 84 1 Surat

7 DELHI 20 Delhi 648 0.72 648 252 3 -

8 GOA 21 Goa 432 1.69 432 168 2 - 9 GUJARAT 22 Surat 432 0.66 432 168 2 -

23 Ahmedabad 648 1.46 648 252 3 -

24 Vadodara 432 1.32 432 168 2 - 25 Rajkot 432 0.25 432 168 2 - 26 Bhavnagar 432 2.19 648 252 3 -

10 HARYANA 27 Faridabad 432 0.96 432 168 2 -

28 Gurgaon * - - 432 168 2 Faridabad 29 Yamunanagar 432 0.28 432 168 2 -

Page 18: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

828

11 HIMACHAL PRADESH

30 Himachal Pradesh 432 0.22 432 168 2 -

12 JAMMU &

KASHMIR

31 Jammu & Kashmir 432 0.61 432 168 2 -

13 JHARKHAND 32 Bokaro 432 0.97 432 168 2 - 33 Dhanbad(M)-jharia 1080 0.54 1080 420 5 - 34 Jamshedpur 1296 2.51 1944 756 9 - 35 Ramgarh (M) * - - 648 252 3 Dhanbad

(M)-Jharia 14 KARNATAKA 36 Bangalore 1296 1.97 1296 504 6 -

37 Belgaum 216 0.9 216 84 1 - 38 Mysore 432 0.34 432 168 2 - 39 Hubli-Dharwad 216 0.47 216 84 1 - 40 Mercara-Kodagu(P) 432 0.38 432 168 2 - 41 Davanagere * - - 216 84 1 Hubli-

Dharwad 42 Gulbarga(P) * - - 432 168 2 Mercara-

Kodagu(P) 15 KERALA 43 Idukki(P) * - - 432 168 2 Ernakulam/

Alwaye 44 Kollam 432 0.57 432 168 2 -

45 Ernakulam/Alwaye 216 1.49 216 84 1 - 16 MADHYA

PRADESH

46 Jabalpur 432 2.61 864 336 4 - 47 Indore 432 0.58 432 168 2 - 48 Bhopal 432 1.86 432 168 2 - 49 Chindwara (M) 432 2.76 864 336 4

17 MAHARASHTRA 50 Mumbai # 1512 0.82 1080 420 5 # 51 Thane * - - 432 168 2 52 Pune 648 0.55 648 252 3 - 53 Nagpur 648 0.84 648 252 3 - 54 Nasik 216 0.6 216 84 1 - 55 Solapur 432 1.67 432 168 2 -

18 MEGHALAYA 56 Shillong * - - 216 84 1 Guwahati

19 ODISHA 57 Cuttak * - - 216 84 1 Angul Talchar 58 Keonjhar(M) * - - 216 84 1

59 Angul Talchar 216 1.04 216 84 1 - 20 PUDUCHERRY 60 Puducherry 216 2.26 432 168 2 -

21 PUNJAB 61 Amritsar 432 3.89 864 336 4 - 62 Ludhiana 432 0.39 432 168 2 - 63 Jallandhar 432 1.46 432 168 2 - 64 Sangrur * - - 432 168 2 Ludhiana

22 RAJASTHAN 65 Jaipur 216 1.44 216 84 1 - 66 Alwar * - - 216 84 1 Jaipur 67 Bhilwara 432 2.29 648 252 3 -

23 TAMIL NADU 68 Coimbatore 432 0.31 432 168 2 - 69 Salem 216 0.32 216 84 1 - 70 Virudhu Nagar * - - 648 252 3 Madurai 71 Chennai 648 0.92 648 252 3 - 72 Madurai 432 1.53 432 168 2 - 73 Triunelveli(M) * - - 432 168 2 Madurai 74 Coonoor(P) 432 0.94 432 168 2 -

24 TRIPURA 75 Tripura (P) 216 0.74 216 84 1 - 25 UTTAR PRADESH 76 Ghaziabad /G.B.Nagar 216 2.04 432 168 2 -

77 Varanasi 216 1.92 216 84 1 -

78 Kanpur 648 3.06 1296 504 6 - 79 Lucknow 432 0.69 432 168 2 - 80 Agra 216 0.2 216 84 1 -

Page 19: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

829

26 UTTRAKHAND 81 Udham Singh Nagar * - - 216 84 1 Ghaziabad / G.B.Nagar

27 WEST BENGAL 82 Kolkatta 3024 0.64 3024 1176 14 - 83 Haldia 216 1.39 216 84 1 - 84 Durgapur 864 3.79 1728 672 8 - 85 Raniganj(M) 648 0.33 648 252 3 - 86 Jalpaiguri(P) 432 1.47 432 168 2 - 87 Darjeeling(P) 432 0.37 432 168 2 - 88 Howrah 1512 0.7 1512 588 7 -

Total 48384 18816 224 $

Remarks.

1. Out of 88 Centres in New Series, 65 Centres are Common to 2001=100.

2. 13 Centres are dropped from 2001 Series.

3. 23 New Centres are included in New Series.

4. '*' New Centres.

5. '#' In existing Series Mumbai & Thane is one centre. Accordingly, the sample size computed on

the basis of average CV pertains to Mumbai + Thane centre. As in the new series Mumbai & Thane

are considered to be independent centres; therefore, computed sample size is proportionally allocated

to these centres based on their relative share in employment.

6. '$' plus 4 Investigators are required for experimental coverage of Handloom & Construction sectors

in respect of four Centres

Dropped Centres

New Centres *

1 Godavarikhani (Andhra Pradesh)

1 Manchiryal (Andhra Pradesh)

14

Sangrur (Punjab)

2 Vijaywada (Andhra Pradesh) 2 Nellore (Andhra Pradesh) 15 Alwar (Rajasthan)

3 Mariani-Jorhat (Assam) 3 Sibsagar (Assam) 16 Virudhu Nagar (Tamil Nadu) 4 Rangapara (Assam) 4 Numaligarh (Assam) 17 Triunelvelli (Tamil Nadu)

5 Mundakyam (Kerala) 5 Biswanath Chariali (Assam) 18 Ramgarh (Jharkhand) 6 Rourkela (Odisha) 6 Patna (Bihar) 19 Raipur (chattisgarh)

7 Ajmer (Rajasthan) 7 Gurgaon (Haryana) 20 Kroba (chattisgarh)

8 Tiruchirapally (Tamil Nadu) 8 Davanagere (Karnataka) 21 Udham Singh Nagar (Uttrakhand)

9 Asansol (west Bengal) 9 Gulbarga (Karnataka) 22 Dadra & Nagar Haveli (D&NH)

10 Siliguri (west Bengal) 10 Idukki (Kerala) 23 Shillong (Mehgalaya)

11 Giridih (Jharkhand) 11 Thane (Maharastra)

12 Koderma (Jharkhand) 12 Cuttak (Odisha)

13 Ranchi-Hatia (Jharkhand) 13 Keonjhar (Odisha)

Page 20: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

830

Annexure - III

Sample Size for Proposed WCFI&ES in respect of New Centres

Sl.

No.

New Centre Similar/ Neighbouring Centres

Sam

ple

Siz

e i

n

resp

ect

of

New

Cen

tres

Name

Em

plo

ym

ent

Siz

e

Name

Em

plo

ym

ent

Siz

e

Av

rag

e C

. V

.

for

the

36

Mo

nth

s

Sample Size

In P

rev

iou

s

WC

FI&

ES

(199

9-2

00

0)

Fo

r P

ropo

sed

WC

FI&

ES

1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10

1 Manchiryal(M) -Adilabad

31387 Warrangal 37995 2.15 216 432 432 Chindwara (M.P)

25761 2.76 432 864

2 Nellore 29971 Guntur 26386 1.28 216 216 216 3 Sibsagar(P) 88270 Doom-

Dooma-Tinsukia(P)

178870 0.98 432 432 432

4 Numaligarh- Golaghat(P)

73168 Doom-Dooma-Tinsukia(P)

178870 0.98 432 432 432

5 Biswanath Chariali(P)- Sonitpur

74900 Doom-Dooma-Tinsukia(P)

178870 0.98 432 432 432

6 Patna 87485 Monghyr-Jamalpur

32657 1.45 432 432 864

7 Raipur 78063 Bhilai 40767 1.27 432 432 864 8 Korba(M) 42124 Bhilai 40767 1.27 432 432 432 9 Dadra & Nagar

Haveli 50000 Surat 93044 0.66 432 432 216

10 Gurgaon 118761 Faridabad 118690 0.96 432 432 432

11 Ramgarh (M) 27655 Dhanbad(M)-jharia

61333 0.54 1080 1080 648

12 Davanagere 32980 Hubli-Dharwad

48626 0.47 216 216 216

13 Gulbarga(P) 47035 Mercara-Kodagu(P)

40204 0.38 432 432 432

Belgaun 67101 0.9 216 216 14 Idukki(P) 38665 Ernakulam/

Alwaye 15220 1.49 216 216 432

15 Thane Sample Size of 432 has been determined on the basis of relative share of employment with Mumbai Centre

16 Shillong 13863 Guwahati 75022 0.48 216 216 216 17 Cuttak 27209 Angul

Talchar 30750 1.04 216 216 216

18 Keonjhar(M) 29266 Angul Talchar

30750 1.04 216 216 216

Rani Ganj (West Bengal)

28511 0.33 648 648

19 Sangrur 53542 Ludhiana 194352 0.39 432 432 432 Jalandhar 55207 1.46 432 432

20 Alwar 86278 Jaipur 110330 1.44 216 216 216 21 Virudhu Nagar 108611 Madurai 65804 1.53 432 432 648

22 Triunelveli(M) 67867 Madurai 65804 1.53 432 432 432 23 Udham Singh

Nagar 49548 Ghaziabad

/G.B.Nagar 246331 2.04 216 216 216

Page 21: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

831

Annexure - IV

State/UT wise Sample size for New Working Class Family Income Expenditure Survey

under new CPI(IW) series

Sl.

No.

Name of the State Sample size No.of

Investigators

For Schedule 'A' For Schedule 'B1'

1 ANDHRA PRADESH 3024 1176 14

2 ASSAM 2808 1092 13

3 BIHAR 1296 504 6

4 CHANDIGARH 216 84 1

5 CHATTISGARH 1728 672 8

6 DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 216 84 1

7 DELHI 648 252 3

8 GOA 432 168 2

9 GUJARAT 2592 1008 12

10 HARYANA 1296 504 6

11 HIMACHAL PRADESH 432 168 2

12 JAMMU & KASHMIR 432 168 2

13 JHARKHAND 4104 1596 19

14 KARNATAKA 3240 1260 15

15 KERALA 1080 420 5

16 MADHYA PRADESH 2592 1008 12

17 MAHARASHTRA 3456 1344 16

18 MEGHALAYA 216 84 1

19 ODISHA 648 252 3

20 PUDUCHERRY 432 168 2

21 PUNJAB 2160 840 10

22 RAJASTHAN 1080 420 5

23 TAMIL NADU 3240 1260 15

24 TRIPURA 216 84 1

25 UTTAR PRADESH 2592 1008 12

26 UTTRAKHAND 216 84 1

27 WEST BENGAL 7992 3108 37

Total 48384 18816 224 $

'$' plus 4 Investigators are required for experimental coverage of Handloom & Construction sectors in

respect of four Centres.

Page 22: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

832

LABOUR ACTIVITIES

LABOUR SITUATION

Information relating to Closures, Retrenchments and Lay-offs in respect of various

States/Union Territories in the country for the month of January to May, 2014 (Provisional)

received in the Bureau upto 25th

June, 2014 is presented in the following Tables:-

Table-I

State-wise Number of Permanent Closures and Workers Affected during

January to May, 2014 (P)

States/Union Territories No. of Units No. of Workers Affected

1. Karnataka 1 63

2. Tripura 7 197

Total :State Sphere

Central Sphere

Grand Total

8

(-)

8

260

(-)

260

Table-II

Industry-wise Number of Permanent Closures and Workers Affected during

January to May, 2014 (P)

Section

NIC-2008

Description No. of Units

No. of Workers

Affected

C Manufacturing 8 260

Total : State Sphere

Central Sphere

Grand Total

8

(-)

8

260

(-)

260

(P)= Provisional

- = Nil.

.. = Not available.

Note: (i) Information within brackets related to Central Sphere.

(ii) Information about remaining States/Union Territories may be treated as either „NIL‟ or

„Not reported‟

No case of Retrenchment has been received during January to May, 2014 as such Tables

III to IV have not been presented.

Page 23: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

833

Table-V

State-wise Number of Units Affecting Lay-offs, Workers Laid-off and Mandays Lost during

January to May, 2014 (P)

States/Union Territories No. of Units No. of

Workers

Affected

Mandays Lost

1. Andhra Pradesh 1

(-)

115

(-)

8740

(-)

2. Karnataka 3

(-)

51

(-)

261

(-)

3. Kerala 4

(-)

367

(-)

17249

(-)

4. Puducherry 8

(-)

3630

(-)

90659

(-)

Total : State Sphere

Central Sphere

Grand Total

16

(-)

16

4163

(-)

4163

116909

(-)

116909

Table- VI

Industry-wise Number of Units Affecting Lay-offs, Workers Laid-off and Mandays Lost during

January to May, 2014 (P)

Section

NIC-

2008

Description No. of

Units

No. of

Workers

Affected

Mandays Lost

C Manufacturing 15

(-)

4048

(-)

108169

(-)

.. .. 1 115 8740

(-) (-) (-)

Total : State Sphere

Central Sphere

Grand Total

16

(-)

16

4163

(-)

4163

116909

(-)

116909

(P)= Provisional

- = Nil.

.. = Not available.

Note: (i) Information within brackets related to Central Sphere.

(ii) Information about remaining States/Union Territories may be treated as either „NIL‟ or

„Not reported‟.

Page 24: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

834

Table-VII

Month-wise break-up of Mandays Lost due to Lay-off during January to May, 2014 (P)

Month Mandays Lost

January 46,866 (-)

February 32,641 (-)

March 21,798 (-)

April 15,604 (-)

May .. (..)

Total: State Sphere

Central Sphere

Grand Total

1,16,909

(-)

1,16,909

(P)= Provisional - = Nil. .. = Not available.

Note: Information within brackets related to Central Sphere.

Industrial Disputes during January to May, 2014 (Provisional)

The statistics of work-stoppages due to Industrial Disputes during January to May,

2014 based on the returns received from different State Labour Departments / Regional Labour

Commissioners (Central) are presented in the following tables:

As per available information 78 Industrial Disputes resulting in work-stoppages were

reported during January to May, 2014 in which 351108 workers were involved and 1208577

mandays lost were reported. Besides, there were 9 disputes which occurred due to reasons other

than Industrial Disputes also. In the said disputes 5935 workers were involved and 430465

mandays were lost..

Table VIII

Number of Mandays Lost on Account of Work-stoppages during

January to May, 2013 and 2014 Number of Mandays Lost on Account of

Month Industrial Disputes Reasons Other Than Industrial Disputes

2013 (P) 2014 (P) 2013 (P) 2014(P)

1 2 3 4 5

January 183112 155590 148100 154035 February 1270002 762480 143127 141430 March 162349 118594 147595 135000 April 275609 118137 148605 ..

May 199588 53776 153805 .. Total 2090660 1208577 741232 430465

(P) = Provisional and based on the returns /clarifications received in the Bureau till 2nd

September, 2014. - = Nil .. = Not available

N.B:- Figures for 2014 are not comparable with those for 2013 due to non-receipt of data from

various States / Union Territories.

Page 25: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

835

Table IX

State-wise Major* Industrial Disputes in India including Industrial Disputes

Due to Reasons other than Industrial Disputes till May, 2014 (P)

Name of the State /

Union Territory /

Sphere / Sector /

Number of

Establishments

affected

Strike/

Lockout

Cause No. of

Workers

involved

No. of

Mandays

lost

(in

000‟s)

Wages

lost

(Rs. in

Lakhs)

Production

loss

(Rs. in

Lakhs)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

CENTRAL SPHERE NIL

STATE SPHERE

Haryana

One unit

(Private Sector)

Lockout Non implement-

ation of labour

agreement

1134 115.668 .. ..

Rajasthan

One unit

(Private Sector)

Strike Charter of Demands

4638 78.846 311 4600

(P) = Provisional and based on the returns /clarifications received in the Bureau till 2nd

September, 2014.

.. = Not available

* = All disputes in which there was a time-loss of 50,000 or more mandays during the period

under review or since the beginning of the disputes are classified as major disputes

A man is but the product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes.

-Mahatma Gandhi

Page 26: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

836

NEWS IN BRIEF

(a) INDIAN LABOUR The news items reported below have been gleaned from various official and unofficial

sources. Hence, the Labour Bureau is not in a position to vouchsafe the authenticity of the unofficial news items.

Rural Ministry Takes Steps for Timely Payment under Jobs Scheme - The rural

development ministry will identify up to 1,000 blocks across the country where there are no

banks or internet connectivity, so that wages under the rural job guarantee scheme can be

disbursed in cash. The move is aimed at checking delays in payment of wages under the

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) besides reviving

interest in the scheme. "The government of India, in consultation with state governments, will

identify 800-1,000 blocks in the country based on criteria of low or nil internet connectivity and

non-existence of banks or post offices, for allowing payments through cash in these places," the

ministry said in a discussion paper. Delay in wage payments is one of the foremost disincentives

for beneficiaries to seek employment under the programme. As per Section 3(3) of the

MGNREGA, 2005, "Disbursement of daily wages shall be made on a weekly basis or in any

case not later than a fortnight after the date on which such work was done." "However, even

after eight years of the implementation of MGNREGA and the number of measures taken for

timely wage payment, serious delays in payment have been recorded," the ministry has admitted

in the discussion paper. According to some estimates, on an average, around 40% of the total

wage payments are delayed by more than 15 days. In 2013-14, around 16% of the total payments

were delayed between 15 and 30 days, 15% were delayed by 30 to 60 days, 7% were delayed by

60 to 90 days and 6% were delayed by more than 90 days. The problem is acute in certain blocks

in Jharkhand, Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, J&K, Chhattisgarh and the northeast, where wages are

delayed by up to 90 days, defeating the social welfare aspect of the scheme.

(The Economic Times, 03.06.2014)

Govt Working towards Liberalising Labour Laws to Boost Factory Jobs - The NDA

government has begun a fresh review of the country‟s labour laws that have remained

unchanged since Independence, and tailor them to meet the needs of the National Manufacturing

Policy with an aim towards boosting growth in the manufacturing sector. Accordingly, the

labour ministry has proposed changes to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for easier

retrenchment of workers in the National Investment and Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs). Under

the proposal, workers in any unit in the NIMZ may be removed without notice or compensation

if the employer provides them with alternative employment in the same zone at the same pay

and conditions of work. In case alternative employment is not possible, the employer will have

to pay compensation to the worker at the rate of 20 days‟ wages for every completed year of

continuous service or any part over six months. This is a significant change from the current law

where such a provision is not available for workers in the manufacturing sector. Companies with

over 100 workers cannot terminate the services of workers who have been employed for over

one year without prior permission of the state government and three months‟ notice. “Such a

provision is already present in the Act for workers engaged in mines. Based on a

Page 27: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

837

recommendation of the department of industrial policy and promotion, we want to extend it to

cover the manufacturing sector as well,” said a senior labour ministry official, adding that the

objective is not to make retrenchment of workers easier, but to give some flexibility to

employers. The labour ministry has now called a tri-partite meeting with trade union

representatives and employers before finalising amendments to the Industrial Disputes Act.

(The Indian Express, 16.06.2014)

Employee Productivity Takes a Hit in FY14 - Employee Productivity - measured in terms of

the revenue earned on each rupee spent on staff -fell to a three-year low in the last fiscal year, as

employee cost grew at a faster pace than revenue. The findings are based on an analysis of 403

of the BSE 500 companies on which data were available. Each rupee spent on employees

yielded revenue of Rs 12 in the year ended March 31, compared with Rs 12.40 in FY13 and Rs

12.90 in FY12. Employee cost as a proportion of revenue stood at 8.4% in FY14 - higher than

8.1% in the previous year and 7.7% the year before. The trend remains the same in employee-

intensive sectors like information technology, banking and financial services as well as pharma.

Total employee cost over the past three years has grown at a compounded annual growth rate

(CAGR) of 16.3% to Rs 4.8-lakh crore. Revenue increased at a much slower CAGR of 11.8% to

Rs 57.8-lakh crore, while total expenditure rose 10.6% to Rs 44.1-lakh crore and operating

profit by 15% to Rs 9-lakh crore. "Normally, this divergence appears during periods of

economic slowdown when despite revenue coming under pressure, companies cannot cut down

labour cost on account of high inflation," said G Chokkalingam, managing director of

Equinomics Research & Advisory. With gross domestic product growth at a 10-year low,

companies have faced slowdown in revenue growth. However, employees have had to be

compensated for accelerating inflation during the past three years.

(The Economic Times, 17.06.2014)

Labour Ministry to Roll Out Revamped Vocational Courses - The labour ministry has

decided to go full steam ahead with a National Employment Policy with new courses for skilling

that would meet the needs of the modern economy. “The ministry proposes to formulate a

National Employment Policy (NEP) that is responsive to the aspirations of the youth and in

synergy with the growth strategies of our country,” it said, seeking public comments. According

to the plan, the ministry will roll out revamped courses for vocational training from August this

year, expand the scope of apprenticeship and women RTIs as well as re-orient employment

exchanges to provide career counselling, vocational guidance and employment services of youth.

An online portal will also be launched later this year to enable single window clearance for all

labour laws. Further, social security coverage to all unorganised sector workers will also be

provided.

(The Indian Express, 17.06.2014)

Now, Get Job-ready with Red-hot Skills - With the installation of the new government at the

Centre, hopes of a speedy economic revival have led to expectations that employment will get a

boost, especially in sectors such as infrastructure, manufacturing and defence. Experts caution,

though, that the coming boom will benefit only those who possess the relevant skills. According

to staffing consultancy Kelly Services, overall demand for skills in areas and functions such as

sales and marketing, mobile technology, analytics in information technology (IT), relationship

managers in banking, and R&D is likely to grow 10-15% in 2014 compared to the previous

year. The new economy sectors of IT, business intelligence and data, and e-commerce have been

Page 28: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

838

witnessing a surge over the past few months. The financial services industry has received a push

from reforms and new licences while consumer durables and automobile sectors are likely to

pick up if the positive sentiment translates into increased purchasing power. Aviation, too, may

see an uptick in demand with the arrival of new carriers. Technology skills are expected to be in

demand across sectors while offers are likely to pour in for civil engineers, accountants, people

managers and sales experts.

(The Economic Times, 17.06.2014)

States Call for Watch on Labour Conditions Abroad - As India tries to evacuate workers still

caught up in the ongoing Iraq crisis, states have urged the Centre to take cognisance of the

vulnerability of millions of Indians working abroad by creating a central registry to monitor

their work conditions and protect them from exploitation by employers. The issue was raised at

a national conference chaired by Union labour minister where a number of state labour

ministers, including those from Bihar and Orissa stressed that the government must have a

central registry of workers moving abroad for jobs to protect their rights and prevent them from

exploitation and harassment by employers. Kerala, which till recently sent the largest number of

workers abroad, already has a registry to monitor these migrants, such a facility has not been set

up at the all-India level. Bihar has also recently started the Samundar Paar Niyojan Bureau that

is a registration and facilitation point for workers from the state moving abroad for work. While

the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs registers private recruitment agencies that place workers

abroad and also has bilateral pacts with some countries for protection of workers, there is no

specialised central registry of such workers or monitoring of their conditions of work.

Harassment of workers is common with employers often taking away their passports and not

even paying them minimum wages. According to official estimates, over 7.5 million workers

moved abroad in 2012 of the total 25 million Indians working in more than 200 countries such

as Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, Qatar and even war torn countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. A

majority of the workers belong to Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

are engaged primarily in blue-collar jobs such as construction, machinery operators, drivers and

domestic workers.

(The Indian Express, 30.06.2014)

Industries/Services Declared/Granted Extension as Public Utility Services under the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947– As per the information received in the Bureau, the following

Industries/Services have been declared Public Utility Services for a period of six months with

effect from the date mentioned against them.

Sl. No.

Authority Making Declaration

Industry/Service Date of Declaration/ Extension

1 Central Government I) Services in the Iron and Steel 15.06.2014 II) Services in the Iron Ore Mining

Industry 18.06.2014

You have to grow from the inside out. None can teach you, none can

make you spiritual. There is no other teacher but your own soul.

-Swami Vivekananda

Page 29: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

839

Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) on base 2001=100 and Agricultural and Rural Labourers on base 1986-87=100 for the month June, 2014

Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers- The All-India CPI-IW for June, 2014 increased by 2 points and pegged at 246 (two hundred and forty six). On 1-month percentage change, it increased by 0.82 percent between May, 2014 and June, 2014 when compared with the rise of 1.32 per cent between the same two months a year ago. The largest upward pressure to the change in current index came from Food group contributing 1.37 percentage points to the total change. At item level, Rice, Fish Fresh, Goat Meat, Poultry Chicken, Milk, Onion, Potato, Tomato and other vegetables, Sugar, Cigarette, Electricity Charges, Bus Fare. Barber & Tailoring Charges, Toilet Soap, etc. are responsible for the increase in index. However, this increase was restricted to some extent by Wheat & Wheat Atta, Edible Oils, Fruits, Soft Coke. Medicine (Allopathie), etc., putting downward pressure on the index. The year-on-year inflation measured by monthly CPI-IW stood at 6.49 percent for June, 2014 as compared to 7.02 per cent for the previous month and 11.06 per cent during the corresponding month of the previous year. Similarly, the Food inflation stood at 5.88 per cent against 7.66 per cent of the previous month and 14.86 per cent during the corresponding month of the previous year. At centre level, Goa, Mudurai, Vishakhapathnam, Bengluru and Kodarma recorded the maximum increase of 6 points each followed by Ahmedabad and Hubli Dharwar (5 points each). Among others, 4 points rise was observed in 8 centres, 3 points in 11 centres, 2 points in 16 centres and 1 point in another 16 centres. On the contrary, a decline of 8 points was reported in Giridih, 2 points each in Yamunanagar and Sholapur, and 1 point in 5 centres. Indices of remaining 12 centres experienced no change. The indices of 36 centres are above and other 42 centres are below national average.

(Labour Bureau) Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers- The All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers (Base: 1986-87=100) for June, 2014 increased by 8 and 7 points respectively to stand at 785 (Seven hundred and eighty five) points and 787 (Seven hundred and eighty seven) points. The rise/fall in index varied from State to State. In case of Agricultural Labourers, it recorded an increase between 1 to 14 points in 18 States and a decrease of 1 point in 1 State. However, it remained stationary in 1 State. Haryana with 855 points topped the index table whereas Himachal Pradesh with the index level of 636 points stood at the bottom. In case of Rural Labourers, it recorded an increase between 1 to 14 points in 18 States and a decrease of 2 and 3 points in 2 States. Haryana with 848 points topped the index table whereas Himachal Pradesh with the index level of 670 points stood at the bottom. The Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers in respect of Meghalaya and Manipur States registered the maximum increase of 14 points each while for Rural Labourers, Tripura and Manipur States registered the maximum increase of 14 points mainly due to increase in the prices of rice, pulses, fish fresh/dry, poultry, vegetables & fruits, fire wood and shirting cloth (cotton mill). The Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers in respect of Rajasthan State registered a decrease of 1 point while for Rural Labourers Himachal Pradesh State registered the maximum decrease of 3 points mainly due to decrease in the prices of moong dal, gur, dhoti (cotton mill) and shirting cloth (cotton mill). Point to point rate of inflation based on the CPI-AL and CPI-RL decreased from 8.07% and 8.33% in May, 2014 to 7.68% and 7.81% in June, 2014. Inflation based on food index of CPI-AL and CPI-RL are 6.69% and 6.81% respectively during June, 2014.

(Labour Bureau)

Page 30: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

840

(b) FOREIGN LABOUR

More than 70 Per Cent of the World Population Lacks Proper Social Protection - More than 70 per cent of the world population is not adequately covered by social protection, says a new report by the International Labour Organization (ILO). According to the “World Social Protection Report 2014/15: Building economic recovery, inclusive development and social justice,” only 27 per cent of the global population enjoys access to comprehensive social security. “The global community agreed in 1948 that social security and health care for children, working age people who face unemployment or injury and older persons are a universal human right,” said ILO Deputy Director-General Sandra Polaski. “And yet in 2014 the promise of universal social protection remains unfilled for the large majority of the world‟s population.” Social protection is a key policy tool to reduce poverty and inequality while stimulating inclusive growth by boosting the health and capacity of vulnerable segments of society, increasing their productivity, supporting domestic demand and facilitating the structural transformation of national economies. “The case for social protection is even more compelling in these times of economic uncertainty, low growth and increased inequality. It is also an issue that the international community should embrace prominently in the post-2015 development agenda,” added Polaski. The latest trends show that a number of high-income countries are contracting their social security systems. On the other hand, many middle-income countries are expanding their social protection systems, supporting household incomes and thereby boosting demand-led growth and inclusive development. China, for example, is close to achieving universal pension coverage and has sharply increased minimum wages and Brazil has accelerated the expansion of social protection coverage and minimum wages since 2009. Some lower-income countries, for example Mozambique, have also extended social protection, yet often through temporary safety nets with very low benefit levels. Many of these countries are now undertaking efforts to build social protection floors as part of more comprehensive social protection systems. The report looks at different social protection trends following a life-cycle approach.

(ILO News, 03.06.2014)

Euro Zone Stumbles after China Surges - Signs of an economic revival in China have raised hopes that Beijing‟s targeted measures to bolster growth are having an impact but a slowdown in the euro zone will increase expectations of policy easing there. Chinese factory activity expanded at the fastest pace in five months in May but euro zone manufacturing growth slowed more than initially thought, fuelling expectations that the European Central Bank will ease policy this week. “The Chinese numbers were fractionally higher. We are beginning to make some progress but it is consistent with this story that the Chinese economy is not going to grow as fast as it has in the past,” said Peter Dixon at Commerzbank. “The European numbers were in and around the ballpark. It‟s not the kind of data the ECB is going to react to instantly but it is part of a bigger puzzle that says we need more growth in Europe.” Markit‟s final Manufacturing Purchasing Managers‟ Index (PMI) for the euro zone slipped to a six-month low of 52.2 in May from April‟s 53.4 as strong figures from Germany failed to offset a contraction in activity in France. The final number was below the initial reading of 52.5 but held above the 50 mark that separates growth from contraction for the 11th straight month. A subindex measuring output sank to 54.3 from 56.5, weaker than the initial reading of 54.7. Inflation in the 18 nations using the euro is predicted to have held steady at just 0.7% in May, well within the ECB‟s “danger zone” of below 1% and also below its preferred 2% ceiling. Germany is Europe‟s largest economy and again supported the tepid overall growth but in France, the bloc‟s second largest, the PMI sank back below the 50 mark after just two months of expansion.

(The Financial Express, 03.06.2014)

Fewest Americans Filed Jobless Claims in May Since 2007 - Fewer Americans filed applications for unemployment benefits over the past month than at any time in seven years, a sign the labor market continues to strengthen. The four-week average for jobless claims fell to 310,250 in the period ended May 31, the lowest since June 2007, the Labor Department reported. The number of applications last week climbed to 312,000 from 304,000, in line with the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. A drop in dismissals over time may be a sign that

Page 31: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

841

companies, lean from prior job-cutting, are preparing for improving demand. Now, sustained hiring gains are needed to push up wages and spur better consumer spending, which accounts for 70% of the economy. The number of people continuing to receive jobless benefits dropped by 20,000 to 2.6 million in the week ended May 24, the fewest since October 2007. The unemployment rate among people eligible for benefits held at 2 percent in the same week. Employers added 288,000 workers to payrolls in April, and further gains are projected.

(The Economic Times, 06.06.2014) IMF Cuts US Growth Outlook, Says Full Employment Years Off - The International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecast for the United States and said the economy would not reach full employment until the end of 2017, allowing interest rates to be held near zero for longer than financial markets expect. In its annual health check of the US economy, the IMF cut its 2014 forecast to 2 per cent from the 2.8 per cent it predicted in April, due to a weak first quarter. It kept its 2015 forecast unchanged at 3 per cent, as job creation picks up after a harsh winter. "Recent data ... suggest a meaningful rebound in activity is now underway and growth for the remainder of this year and 2015 should well exceed potential," the IMF said. Yet the country's potential growth should only be around 2 per cent going forward, below historical averages, as the population ages and productivity growth slows, it added.

(Business Standard, 17.06.2014)

Decent Jobs for Youth are Essential to the Future We Want - Youth unemployment is an “epidemic” that represents “a great test of our time,” said UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, during a visit to the International Labour Organization. “In countries rich and poor, unemployment rates for young people are many times those of adults – and of course joblessness is the tip of the iceberg,” said Ban during an ILO event on youth employment. “Many are stuck in low wage work with no protection in the informal economy. Many others find that their schooling has not equipped them with the tools for today‟s job market.” The head of the UN echoed the words of Pope Francis, who in a message to the International Labour Conference, had said that with high youth unemployment, “we are throwing away an entire generation.” “This is why I have made „Working with and for women and young people‟ one of my top priorities,” Ban said. “The UN system is implementing a system-wide action plan on youth. One priority – which is led by the ILO – is increasing cooperation on employment and entrepreneurship for youth.” He called on governments to invest more in youth employment initiatives and said that the private sector was a key driver of job creation. He urged trade unions, employers‟ organizations and businesses to “empower more youth in your own structures and engage with youth-led organizations,” adding that, “trade unions have a fundamental role in promoting and protecting young workers‟ rights”.

(ILO News, 18.06.2014)

Indian Workers Stranded as Employer Retains Passports - Several hundred Indian nationals might be stranded in the Najaf province of Iraq, unable to return home because their employer refusing to return their passports, Amnesty International said. With the fighting between state forces and armed groups intensifying and affecting civilians across Iraq, stranded Indian workers could be facing rising dangers, it said in a statement. All the workers are reportedly employed with an infrastructure and construction company, the statement said, adding that Amnesty International India spoke to some of these workers, who said they had not been paid salaries for the last five months. It quoted one of the migrant workers, telling them over the phone: “The employer holds all our passports and refuses to return them. We have been restricting ourselves to the company premises since the conflict began because we are scared. Without our passports, we can‟t leave this country, and every passing day makes us feel more and more unsafe. We just want to go home.” The statement welcomed the Indian government‟s initiatives to evacuate stranded workers.

(The Sunday Express, 22.06.2014)

Page 32: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

842

LABOUR DECISIONS

Basic wage would mean the wage which is universally, necessarily and ordinarily paid to all the employees across the board – In this case a dispute was raised on account of the calculation of 15% of the basic wage as Hill Development Allowance to be paid to the employees working at specified hill areas. In pursuance of the UP Govt. order, Kichha Sugar Company Limited, a unit of a subsidiary of U.P. Government Corporation, started paying Hill Development Allowance at the rate of 15% of the basic wage. The workmen demanded calculation of 15% of the said allowance by taking into account the amount paid as overtime, leave encashment and all other allowances, which was not agreeable to the employer. The matter was referred to conciliation and on its failure, the competent Government made a reference to the Industrial Tribunal. After considering the view point of both the parties the Tribunal gave award directing the employer to "give Hill Development Allowance to their permanent and regular workers on the amount received regarding leave encashment and overtime wages." However, the Tribunal observed that "Hill Development Allowance shall not be payable on bonus and retaining allowance or on any other allowances". The employer, aggrieved by the award preferred writ petition before the High Court, which affirmed the same. Hence, the present appeal. After hearing both the counsel appearing for each party and considering the earlier decisions, the apex Court observed that Hill Development Allowances was nothing but a compensatory allowance. A compensatory allowance broadly falls into three categories; (i) allowance to meet the high cost of living in certain, specially costly cities and other local areas; (ii) allowance to compensate for the hardship of service in certain areas, e.g. areas which have a bad climate and/or difficult to access; and (iii) allowances granted in areas, e.g. field service areas, where, because of special conditions of living or service, an employee cannot, besides other disadvantages, have his family with him. There may be cases in which more than one of these conditions for grant of compensatory allowance is fulfilled. It seems that taking into account bad climate and remote and difficult access, the decision was taken to grant the Hill Development Allowance at the rate of 15% of the basic wage. The expression 'basic wage' has not been explained by the Government in the order granting Hill Development Allowance. It has been defined only under Section 2(b) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. When an expression is not defined, one can take into account the definition given to such expression in a statute as also the dictionary meaning. In opinion of the apex court, those wages which are universally, necessarily and ordinarily paid to all the employees across the board are basic wage. Where the payment is available to those who avail the opportunity more than others, the amount paid for that cannot be included in the basic wage. In view of above, the apex court found that the amount received as leave encashment and overtime wages were not fit to be included for calculating 15% of the Hill Development Allowance. These allowances are available across the board but may vary from one workman to the other. Hence, the apex court allowed the appeal, set aside the award and the judgment of the High Court with no costs. (Kichha Sugar Co. Ltd. through General Manager Vs. Tarai Chini Mill Majdoor Union, Uttarakhand, All India Services Law Journal, Volume-116, Part-I, May, 2014, pp. 47-52)

Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy.

-Anne Frank

Page 33: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

843

LABOUR LITERATURE

IMPORTANT ARTICLES OF LABOUR INTEREST PUBLISHED IN THE PERIODICALS AND NEWSPAPERS RECEIVED IN THE LABOUR BUREAU

EMPLOYMENT AND

UNEMPLOYMENT

M.Obalesu and G.Sivaiah Mahatma Gandhi NREG Programme in

Anantapur, AP: An Assessment; Southern

Economist, Vol.53, No.1, May 1, 2014; pp. 19-

24.

S. Chandrasekhar and Ajay Sharma On the Spatial Concentration of Employment in

India; Economic & Political Weekly, Vol.

XLIX, No.21, May 24, 2014; pp. 16-18.

Santosh Mehrotra Quantity & Quality: Policies to Meet the Twin

Challenges of Employability in Indian Labor

Market; The Indian Journal of Industrial

Relations, Vol.49, No.3, January, 2014; pp.

367-377.

Paul Comyn Linking Employment Services, Skill

Development & Labour Market Needs: Issues

for India; ibid. pp. 378-388.

TV Mohandas Pai Incentivise Jobs, not Capital Alone; The

Financial Express, dated the 4th

June, 2014; p. 7.

Uma Ganesh Making today‟s Youth Employable; The

Financial Express, dated 16th

June, 2014; p. 8.

Nirvikar Singh Reviving Job Growth; The Financial Express,

dated 18th

June, 2014; p. 6

Dr. Rajen Mehrotra Challenges Facing the Indian Manufacturing

Sector; Current Labour Reports, Vol.30, Part-3,

March, 2014; pp.45-50.

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH &

SAFETY

Anil Kaushik Safety at Work: How to Achieve? Current

Labour Reports, Vol.30, Part-3, March, 2014;

pp. 51-52.

Krishna Gopal Rampal Ageing Workers in Malaysia; Asian-Pacific

Newsletter, Vol. 21, No.1, April, 2014; pp. 4-6.

Kazuya Suzuki, Takashi Okumura,

Fumiko Matsuda, Toru, Ikegami

Practical Support Measures for Ageing Workers

in Japan, ibid, pp. 7-10.

Page 34: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

844

Sun Shuhan, Mao Ailin Occupational Health and Safety of Ageing

Workers in China; ibid, pp. 10-12.

WOMEN EMPLOYEES

A. Manivel Women Entrepreneurs – Problems and Factors

Influencing Enterprises; Southern Economist,

Vol.53, No.1, May 1, 2014; pp.29-32.

Anindita Sengupta, Panchanan Das Gender Wage Discrimination across Social and

Religious Groups in India: Estimates with Unit

Level Data; Economic & Political Weekly, Vol.

XLIX, No.21, May 24, 2014; pp. 71-76.

Dr. Rajen Mehrotra Zero Tolerance of Sexual Harassment at the

Workplace; Current Labour Reports, Vol.30,

Part-4, April, 2014; pp. 69-75.

MISCELLANEOUS

V. Venkateshraj and H. Nagaraj Investment Pattern of Employed Women;

Southern Economist, Vol.53, No.1, May 1,

2014; pp. 33-36.

Saloni Chopra, Jessica Pudussery Social Security Pensions in India: An

Assessment; Economic & Political Weekly,

Vol. XLIX, No.19, May 10, 2014; pp. 68-74.

Dilip H.M. Chenoy STAR Scheme to Catalyse the Skill Ecosystem;

The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations,

Vol.49, No.3, January, 2014; pp. 363-366.

K.S.Hari Economic Development in India: An Inter-state

Analysis; Artha Vijnana, Vol.LV, No.2, June,

2013; pp. 125-148.

L.G. Burange and Rucha R Ranadive Maharashtra‟s Organised Manufacturing Sector:

An Appraisal; ibid. pp. 172-197.

Sunil Sanghai India Needs FDI in Manufacturing to Push both

Jobs & Growth; The Economic Times, dated the

13th

June, 2014; p. 9.

Bibek Debroy Lots to Do on Labour Laws; The Economic

Times, dated the 20th

June, 2014; p. 6.

The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook.

-William James

Page 35: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

845

STATISTICS

Section A

MONTHLY STATISTICS

Pages

Notes 847

1. Prices and Price Indices

1.1. Industrial Workers’ Consumer Price Index

Table A.1.1.1. Labour Bureau‟s Series of All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers

for Industrial Workers (Base : 2001=100)

849

Table A.1.1.2. Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Industrial Workers in respect of 78 constituent centres (Base:

2001=100)

850

Table A.1.1.3. Average Monthly Consumer Prices of Selected Articles for

Industrial Workers

858

1.2. Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural

Labourers

Table A.1.2.1-

(a) and (b)

Labour Bureau‟s Series of All-India Average Consumer Price Index

Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers (Base : 1986-

87=100) Group- wise and General

868

Table A.1.2.2-

(a) and (b)

Average Monthly Consumer Prices of Selected Articles for

Agricultural and Rural Labourers (Base : 1986-87 =100)

872

2. Wages and Earnings

Table A 2.1.-

(a) and (b)

Average Daily Wage Rates for Agricultural & Non-Agricultural

Occupations in Rural India

879

3. Industrial Disputes

Table A 3.1.- Sector/Sphere-wise Number of Disputes, Workers Involved and

Mandays Lost due to Industrial Disputes

889

Table A 3.2.- State-wise Industrial Disputes (All Strikes and Lockouts) 890

Page 36: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

846

Section B

SERIAL STATISTICS

Pages

Notes 891

1. Prices and Price Indices

1.1. Industrial Workers Consumer Price Index

Table B.1.1.1 All India Average Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial

Workers (Base 2001=100)

893

Table B.1.1.2 Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Industrials Workers (Base : 2001=100)

894

1.2. Agricultural Labourers Consumer Price Index

Table B. 1.2.1

(a) and (b)

All-India Average Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Agricultural Labourers (General & Food) (Base 1986-87=100)

905

Table B.1.2.2

(a) and (b)

Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Agricultural Labourers (General Index on Base : 1986-87=100)

907

1.3. Consumer Price Index for Urban and Rural Areas

Table B. 1.3. All India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Urban Non-Manual

Employees/Cunsumer Price Index for Urban and Rural Areas

913

1.4. Wholesale Price Index

Table B.1.4. All-India Index Numbers of Wholesale Prices- New Series 914

2. Wages And Earnings

Table B.2.1. Earnings (Basic Wage and Dearness Allowances) of the Lowest-

Paid Workers/Operatives in Cotton Textile Mills

917

3. Industrial Disputes

Table B. 3.1. Industrial Disputes (All Strikes and Lockouts) 919

Page 37: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

847

SECTION A

MONTHLY STATISTICS

N o t e s

1. Prices and Price Indices

1. 1. Industrial Workers Consumer Price Index

A.1.1.1. Labour Bureau’s Series of All India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers (Base: 2001=100) – The All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers on Base : 2001=100 General and Group-wise along with Linking Factors with previous base: 1982=100 are presented in Table A.1.1.1. The All India Index is a weighted average of 78 constituent centre Indices compiled by the Labour Bureau. The current series of the Index Numbers has been introduced with effect from January, 2006 index replacing the series on base: 1982=100. The All India General Index as well as Group Indices for previous series on base:1982=100 can be obtained by multiplying the current series indices by the respective Linking Factors. A note on the scope and methods of construction of these index numbers was published in April 2006 issue of the “Indian Labour Journal”. The All India Consumer Price Index Number for the month of May, 2014 increased by 2 points and stood at 244. A.1.1.2. Labour Bureau’s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers in respect of 78 constituent centres on Base: 2001=100 – The Consumer Price Index Numbers for industrial workers on Base: 2001=100 for 78 centres compiled by the Labour Bureau are presented group wise in Table A.1.1.2 for the months of April, 2014 and May, 2014.

The Index Numbers measure the extent to which the overall levels of retail prices of goods and services consumed by Industrial Workers has changed when compared with the base period viz., 2001=100. As compared to the previous month the magnitude of rise/fall in the General Index varies from centre to centre. During May, 2014, Coimbatore recorded the maximum increase of 9 points followed by Bhavnagar (7 points) and Amritsar, Mercara and Tiruchirapally (6 points each). Among others, 5 points rise was registered in 7 centres, 4 points in 11 centres, 3 points in 13 centres, 2 points in 11 centres and 1 point in 10 centres. On the contrary, a decline of 5 points was reported in Giridih, 4 points in Chhindwara, 3 points in 2 centres, 2 points in 1 centre and 1 point in 7 centres. Indices of remaining 9 centres observed no change. A 1.1.3. Average Monthly Consumer Prices of Selected Articles for Industrial Workers – The average monthly consumer prices of selected articles based on individual quotations obtained from the selected outlets which are utilised in the compilation of Consumer Price Index Numbers (Base: 2001=100) for Industrial Workers for 78 centres for the month of April, 2014 are set out in Table A.1.1.3. The prices reported in the table are averages of open markets prices of specified varieties of an item prevailing in the selected outlets in the selected market(s) in a given centre during the month in case of non-rationed items. So far as rationed items are concerned, the prices for the centres covered under informal rationing are the weighted average prices, the weights being the proportion of the quantity available through Public Distribution System and quantity procured from the open market in different centres in relation to base year requirements of an average family. In case of centres covered under Statutory Rationing the prices are average of the fair prices of variety (ies) of an item distributed through Fair Price Shops.

1.2 Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers:

A.1.2.1 (a) and (b) Labour Bureau’s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers on Base: 1986-87=100 - All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers on Base: 1986-87=100 replacing the earlier series on base 1960-61=100 were released with effect from November, 1995. The all-India index is a weighted average of 20 constituent State indices compiled by the Labour Bureau for Agricultural and Rural Labourers separately. A detailed note on the scope and method of construction of these indices was published in February, 1996 issue of the Indian Labour Journal.

Page 38: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

848

The Consumer Price Index Numbers (Base: 1986-87=100) for Agricultural and Rural Labourers for 20 States and All-India are presented group-wise in Tables A.1.2.1 (a) and (b) for the months of April, 2014-May, 2014. These index numbers measure the extent of change in the retail prices of goods and services consumed by Agricultural and Rural Labourers as compared with the base period viz., 1986-87. The All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers (Base: 1986-87=100) for May, 2014 increased by 6 and 7 points respectively to stand at 777 ( Seven hundred and seventy seven) points and 780 (Seven hundred and eighty) points.

A.1.2.2 (a) and (b) Monthly Consumer Prices of Selected Articles for Agricultural and Rural Labourers – The monthly consumer prices of selected articles of index basket of agricultural and rural labourers utilised in the compilation of Consumer Price Index Numbers (Base: 1986-87=100) for 20 States separately for Agricultural and Rural Labourers for the month of May, 2014 are given in Tables A.1.2.2. (a) and (b). Though the spatial coverage and the individual sample village price quotations in both the series relating to the Agricultural and Rural Labourers are the same, the weighted prices of items at the State level will be slightly different from each other due to difference in the regional weights in each of the series.

2 Wages and Earnings

A.2.1 (a) and (b) Average Daily Wage Rates for Agricultural and Non-agricultural occupations- In pursuance of the recommendations of the Technical Working Group on rural retail prices set up by the NSSO in 1974, Labour Bureau has been compiling and maintaining average daily wage rate data in respect of agricultural and non-agricultural occupations based on the data collected by the Field Operation Division of National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) from a fixed set of 600 sample villages spread over 66 NSS region in 20 states. Though these wage rate data have been collected since 1986-87, their regular compilation and dissemination started w.e.f April, 1998. The average daily wage rate data was collected for eleven agricultural and seven non-agricultural occupations till October, 2013. However, following the recommendations of the Working Group constituted by the CSO on advice of the National Statistical Commission (NSC), wage rate data is now being collected for 25 occupations (12 agricultural and 13 non-agricultural). The daily wage rate data received from the field are first normalized for eight working hours a day. The simple arithmetic average of these normalized daily wage rates is worked out for each of the 20 states. The average wage rates at all-India level are derived by dividing the sum total of wages of all the 20 states by the number of quotations. These averages are restricted only to those occupations where the numbers of quotations are five or more in order to avoid the apparent inconsistency in wages paid to different categories of workers on account of differences in number of quotations. The month-wise average daily wage rates are thus worked out at State level and also at all-India level are released regularly to the users through various sources. State-wise and all-India average daily wage rates by occupation and sex for the month of May, 2014 have been presented in Table A.2.1 (a) for agricultural occupations and Table A.2.1 (b) for non-agricultural occupations.

3 Industrial Dispute

A.3.1. Sector / Sphere-wise Number of Disputes, Workers Involved and Mandays Lost due to Industrial Disputes during January to May, 2014 – These statistics are received in the Bureau from the State Labour Departments and Regional Labour Commissioners (Central) in the prescribed format in the shape of monthly voluntary returns covering State and Central Spheres separately. Information on Strikes and Lockouts is collected by the concerned authorities and sent to the Bureau every month. Consolidated information for the year 2014 (As on 2

nd

September, 2014.) is presented in Table A.3.1. A.3.2. Industrial Disputes (All Strikes and Lockouts) during January to May 2014- State-wise scenario of Industrial Disputes during January to May, 2014 is presented in Table A.3.2.

NOTES -1. Labour Bureau takes every care to ensure correctness of the information presented in Sections A and B of the Journal. However, any error, if noticed, may kindly be brought to the notice of the Labour Bureau. 2. The indices given in Sections A and B measure the relative change in Consumer

Prices over time at each Centre and as such these cannot be used for comparison of costliness among the different Centres.

Page 39: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

849

1. PRICES AND PRICE INDICES

1.1. Industrial Workers Consumer Price Index

Table A.1.1.1. Labour Bureau‟s Series of All India Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Industrial Workers on base 2001=100 (Group-wise and General)

Index Linking Factor April, 2014 May, 2014

General 4.63 242 244

I-A Food 4.58 264 267

I-B Pan, Supari, Tobacco and

Intoxicants

6.16 260 263

II Fuel and Light 4.77 236 239

III Housing 6.18 260 260

IV Clothing, Bedding and

Footwear

3.22 186 188

V Miscellaneous 4.55 202 203

Linking Factor: The All-India General Index as well as Group Indices for previous series on

base: 1982=100 can be obtained by multiplying the current series indices by

the respective Linking Factors.

We hope the world will act in the spirit of enlightened self-interest.

-Atal Bihari Vajpayee

Page 40: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

850

Table A.1.1.2 – Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial

Sl.

No

State/Union

Territory/ Centre

Linking factor for

General Index with

previous base

1982=100

General Index Food Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

ANDHRA PRADESH

1 Godavarikhani N 258 262 285 290

2 Guntur 4.57 246 247 269 272

3 Hyderabad 4.79 212 215 254 259

4 Vijayawada N 236 238 268 270

5 Visakhapatnam 4.64 241 244 268 274

6 Warrangal 4.75 251 254 291 297

ASSAM

7 Doom-Dooma

Tinsukia

4.04 202 206 208 213

8 Guwahati 4.80 206 210 215 223

9 Labac-Silchar 3.65 239 242 255 259

10 Mariani-Jorhat 4.01 209 214 217 225

11 Rangapara-Tezpur 4.17 210 211 240 242

BIHAR

12 Monghyr-Jamalpur 4.30 242 247 245 255

CHANDIGARH

13 Chandigarh 5.26 245 244 268 264

CHHATTISGARH

14 Bhilai 4.20 270 274 264 271

DELHI

15 Delhi 5.60 219 219 242 237

GOA

16 Goa 5.59 255 260 300 311

GUJARAT

17 Ahmedabad 4.62 230 232 257 262

18 Bhavnagar 4.76 216 223 213 228

19 Rajkot 4.38 232 236 248 257

20 Surat 4.54 216 219 244 248

21 Vadodra 4.39 223 225 241 244

Page 41: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

851

Workers (Group-wise & General 2001=100)

Pan. Supari,

Tobacco and

Intoxicants Index

Fuel & Light

Index

Housing Index Clothing, Bedding

& Footwear Index

Misc. Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

202 207 181 181 377 377 194 199 189 189

305 305 296 297 187 187 181 182 199 199

256 256 153 153 185 185 151 151 186 189

293 293 162 162 216 216 210 216 199 201

242 264 161 159 326 326 224 225 190 190

246 246 162 162 262 262 172 175 211 211

225 232 165 165 185 185 178 179 207 211

221 223 196 196 189 189 203 203 207 207

268 268 208 215 178 178 196 196 217 218

233 221 248 247 126 126 166 166 224 226

165 159 159 159 101 101 249 250 209 210

262 262 273 271 292 292 192 193 223 223

244 244 228 228 308 308 204 204 166 167

271 271 204 205 516 516 165 165 203 203

225 225 229 265 199 199 196 196 195 195

191 191 189 189 249 249 215 215 211 211

349 349 168 168 204 204 173 173 223 223

189 189 160 160 254 254 195 196 205 206

260 260 165 165 251 251 164 165 206 206

321 321 156 156 208 208 154 154 201 201

297 324 173 176 232 232 156 156 212 213

Page 42: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

852

Table A.1.1.2. Contd.

Sl.

No

State/Union Territory /

Centre

Linking factor for

General Index with

previous base

1982=100

General Index Food Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

HARYANA

22 Faridabad 4.79 224 221 265 259

23 Yamunanagar 4.34 239 243 281 285

HIMACHAL PRADESH

24 Himachal Pradesh 4.53 219 219 234 234

JAMMU & KASHMIR

25 Srinagar 5.62 214 216 219 224

JHARKHAND

26 Bokaro N 249 249 248 249

27 Giridih N 302 297 277 274

28 Jamshedpur 4.23 259 264 240 250

29 Jharia 3.72 278 278 263 262

30 Kodarma 3.89 280 279 273 270

31 Ranchi-Hatia 4.20 281 283 257 260

KARNATAKA

32 Bengluru 4.51 247 248 283 286

33 Belgaum 5.02 247 250 276 281

34 Hubli-Dharwar 4.71 260 264 269 278

35 Mercara 4.47 246 252 269 280

36 Mysore N 256 257 289 292

KERALA

37 Ernakulam 4.52 244 247 297 304

38 Mundakayam 4.37 258 263 286 295

39 Quilon 4.61 259 258 289 288

Page 43: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

853

Pan, Supari,

Tobacco and

Intoxicants Index

Fuel & Light

Index

Housing Index Clothing, Bedding

& Footwear Index

Misc. Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

257 255 193 193 238 238 177 177 150 149

282 287 200 205 254 254 192 196 169 172

278 278 221 221 197 197 233 234 189 190

320 320 254 254 178 178 258 263 196 196

214 244 371 370 325 325 228 228 202 202

191 191 810 748 372 372 244 242 207 211

242 247 255 252 452 452 188 188 185 187

206 207 422 422 499 499 246 246 218 219

233 233 452 454 358 358 207 207 217 217

237 240 264 263 496 496 232 233 222 225

249 249 177 177 219 219 149 154 247 244

262 260 212 212 237 237 168 167 215 215

252 260 205 205 335 335 169 168 232 234

223 223 341 341 102 102 185 187 238 240

288 288 206 205 264 264 177 169 216 213

237 240 160 160 201 201 194 194 227 228

294 298 404 402 124 124 190 191 211 212

304 299 248 248 234 234 183 187 211 211

Page 44: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

854

Table A.1.1.2. Contd.

Sl.

No

State/Union Territory/

Centre Linking factor for

General Index

with previous

base 1982=100

General Index Food Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

MADHYA PRADESH

40 Bhopal 4.83 248 249 265 266

41 Chhindwara 4.03 247 243 274 263

42 Indore 4.73 231 231 266 266

43 Jabalpur 4.53 238 239 269 273

MAHARASHTRA

44 Mumbai 5.18 250 253 268 272

45 Nagpur 4.68 270 274 277 284

46 Nasik 4.94 246 250 256 264

47 Pune 4.96 250 253 288 293

48 Solapur 4.73 256 257 270 270

ORISSA

49 Angul-Talcher N 253 253 256 255

50 Rourkela 4.03 253 255 268 270

PUDUCHERRY

51 Pondicherry 4.88 251 254 310 317

PUNJAB

52 Amritsar 4.09 249 255 269 280

53 Jalandhar N 237 236 266 265

54 Ludhiana 4.12 231 230 262 260

RAJASTHAN

55 Ajmer 4.78 239 237 280 274

56 Bhilwara 4.62 238 239 269 269

57 Jaipur 4.25 235 235 255 255

TAMIL NADU

58 Chennai 4.95 223 227 253 261 59 Coimbatore 4.49 222 231 255 272

Page 45: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

855

Pan, Supari,

Tobacco and

Intoxicants Index

Fuel & Light

Index

Housing Index Clothing, Bedding

& Footwear Index

Misc. Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

280 280 216 216 296 296 155 155 213 213

282 282 342 343 214 214 168 170 195 195

290 297 226 227 179 179 154 154 221 223

305 309 226 226 299 299 124 124 195 195

274 275 289 300 235 235 191 191 221 222

286 288 221 236 384 384 185 186 202 202

238 238 215 228 325 325 180 180 192 193

288 288 211 227 215 215 225 225 231 230

306 306 235 246 272 272 204 204 223 223

314 314 246 246 365 365 189 189 195 194

222 224 215 215 358 358 199 199 179 181

247 248 289 290 154 154 177 176 217 217

244 259 247 247 301 301 192 193 185 186

244 244 246 246 231 231 184 184 204 204

252 252 235 227 187 187 232 232 197 201

296 295 201 201 255 255 180 180 195 196

284 284 293 293 190 190 162 162 192 191

259 259 181 181 226 226 187 187 227 227

332 331 186 186 193 193 173 173 204 204

251 275 186 186 186 186 169 171 209 210

Page 46: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

856

Table A.1.1.2. Concld.

Sl.

No

State/Union Territory

Centre

Linking factor for

General Index

with previous

base 1982=100

General Index Food Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

60 Coonoor 4.58 235 236 253 255

61 Madurai 4.51 229 231 273 276

62 Salem 4.45 226 229 248 252

63 Tiruchirapally 5.01 245 251 285 298

TRIPURA

64 Tripura 4.17 205 207 212 214

UTTAR PRADESH

65 Agra 4.36 251 253 254 260

66 Ghaziabad 4.78 241 238 261 251

67 Kanpur 4.50 253 252 279 276

68 Lucknow N 240 239 272 269

69 Varanasi 4.96 240 243 269 270

WEST BENGAL

70 Asansol 4.37 274 274 267 267

71 Darjeeling 3.80 225 230 245 253

72 Durgapur 5.13 280 280 256 255

73 Haldia 5.64 238 241 243 251

74 Howrah 5.42 224 229 257 267

75 Jalpaiguri 3.96 236 238 251 252

76 Kolkata 5.12 236 238 268 272

77 Raniganj 4.02 223 227 252 258

78 Siliguri N 229 230 259 259

Page 47: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

857

Pan, Supari,

Tobacco and

Intoxicants Index

Fuel & Light

Index

Housing Index Clothing, Bedding

& Footwear Index

Misc. Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

242 255 232 230 307 307 165 165 191 192

290 341 174 176 156 156 185 185 203 202

331 346 184 184 157 157 163 163 218 219

275 278 180 180 274 274 158 159 184 185

302 298 264 265 123 123 160 160 203 203

274 274 238 238 370 370 195 195 194 194

249 256 223 223 266 266 212 214 206 205

259 259 226 225 350 350 198 198 182 186

273 273 224 224 310 310 193 193 169 170

222 235 251 255 298 298 163 174 185 189

252 252 407 407 432 432 210 210 191 191

189 185 312 312 107 107 192 192 184 185

260 269 238 238 666 666 207 207 195 196

289 289 220 220 299 299 161 161 162 162

284 284 254 255 203 203 181 181 160 162

238 238 343 343 104 104 190 190 195 202

310 307 244 244 192 192 214 215 187 188

180 182 251 251 192 192 187 187 163 167

172 175 301 301 103 103 172 172 177 177

N- New Centre in the New Series on base: 2001=100.

Page 48: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

858

Table A.1.1.3-Average Monthly Consumer Prices of Selected Articles for Industrial Workers,

May, 2014

Sl.

No

Article Unit Godavr-

ikhani

Guntur Hydera-

bad

Vijayawa-

da

Vishakhapatnam

Warran-

gal

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 Rice Kg. 27.73 41.69 29.15 35.96 37.89 30.22

2 Wheat:

a. Wheat Whole Kg. 29.10 - 30.63 - 29.39 29.13

b. Wheat Atta Kg. 27.30 42.10 23.89 33.05 43.00 41.50

3 Jowar Kg. - - 26.73 - - -

4 Arhar Dal Kg. 72.20 66.90 70.39 70.05 81.25 73.50

5 Moong Dal Kg. 105.60 - 106.58 105.55 114.50 104.30

6 Masur Dal Kg. 67.60 - 67.83 - - 65.00

7 Groundnut oil Litre 93.69 91.20 86.85 81.18 91.99 82.25

8 Mustard Oil Litre - - - - - -

9 Vanaspati Litre - - - - 71.50 -

10 Goat Meat/Mutton Kg. 440.00 472.00 426.67 450.00 460.00 440.00

11 Fish Fresh Kg. 120.00 108.00 121.83 133.50 100.00 -

12 Milk Litre 40.00 45.00 54.58 41.00 40.00 49.00

13 Dairy Milk Litre - 38.00 35.00 38.00 36.00 -

14 Pure Ghee Litre - 390.01 460.00 364.00 341.25 -

15 Onion Kg. 14.70 17.40 14.28 15.60 18.00 12.60

16 Chillies Dry 100 gms. 9.00 8.02 8.34 16.25 11.25 10.05

17 Sugar Kg. 37.99 37.04 33.72 36.67 37.67 34.41

18 Gur Kg. - - 42.43 44.10 42.05 -

19 Tea Leaf 100gms 31.50 41.00 33.83 42.50 43.00 42.75

20 Fire Wood 40 Kg. 240.00 360.00 220.00 380.00 280.00 200.00

21 Soft Coke 40 Kg. - - - - - -

22 Kerosene Oil Litre 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00

23 Toilet Soap 75gms. 16.31 16.13 17.12 13.50 17.25 13.65

24 Washing Soap 225 gms.. 9.31 17.55 12.99 14.40 14.06 14.85

Page 49: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

859

Doom

Dooma

Tinsukia

Guwa

hati

Labac

Silchar

Mariani

Jorhat

Rangapara

Tezpur

Monghyr Jamalpur

Chandigarh

Bhilai

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

15.95 25.23 15.02 17.51 17.29 28.31 30.67 21.18

- - - - - 17.59 - 22.46

5.05 23.51 4.89 4.58 4.47 20.80 21.67 25.50

- - - - - - - -

80.00 79.20 77.50 79.00 - 76.00 76.33 68.00

110.00 104.00 100.00 110.00 110.00 106.00 103.33 100.00

76.33 58.80 89.00 80.00 80.00 60.00 75.00 68.00

- - - - - - - 119.21

105.00 108.00 109.50 106.88 110.00 91.00 87.00 94.00

98.67 106.00 - 100.00 - 75.00 77.25 82.50

300.00 355.00 400.00 310.00 310.00 350.00 320.00 300.00

173.33 155.00 210.00 250.00 180.00 129.00 110.00 230.00

35.00 45.00 42.50 37.00 37.50 35.00 40.00 42.00

- - - - - - 40.00 -

- - - - - 325.00 375.00 360.00

21.25 20.00 25.00 21.00 20.00 18.80 19.83 15.00

13.33 16.00 15.00 12.00 12.00 25.00 28.67 18.00

38.00 36.00 40.00 36.00 37.00 35.00 36.00 32.57

53.33 - 70.00 - 50.00 38.00 42.67 42.50

17.00 22.00 24.00 21.00 38.00 31.20 34.00 30.00

113.34 180.00 187.50 150.00 125.00 380.00 - 260.00

- - - - - 480.00 - -

16.00 15.00 14.78 15.00 16.00 17.63 15.07 14.95

14.40 11.54 12.90 14.40 14.40 16.50 16.50 16.50

26.10 23.69 13.23 13.23 13.23 12.50 8.33 10.47

Page 50: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

860

Table A.1.1.3 Contd.

Sl.

No

Article Unit Delhi Goa Ahmedabad Bhav-

nagar

Rajkot Surat

1 2 3 18 19 20 21 22 23

1 Rice Kg. 19.98 26.94 32.86 33.73 34.64 34.91

2 Wheat:

a. Wheat Whole Kg. 8.64 22.04 21.65 19.42 22.20 23.03

b. Wheat Atta Kg. 17.09 25.08 24.70 30.00 25.00 25.60

3 Jowar Kg. - 31.30 - - - 33.70

4 Arhar Dal Kg. 79.51 76.00 73.06 75.00 75.00 76.45

5 Moong Dal Kg. 105.78 113.17 94.40 99.33 75.00 87.10

6 Masur Dal Kg. 67.81 71.71 70.00 68.67 - 60.20

7 Groundnut oil Litre 170.00 159.27 84.27 105.00 105.00 95.55

8 Mustard Oil Litre 110.00 131.19 85.68 0.00 72.80 105.56

9 Vanaspati Litre 77.06 91.12 74.17 75.00 67.28 71.20

10 Goat Meat/Mutton Kg. 347.50 374.17 340.00 200.00 370.00 340.00

11 Fish Fresh Kg. 129.69 433.00 - 100.00 175.00 173.33

12 Milk Litre 37.53 41.67 42.40 36.67 38.00 47.60

13 Dairy Milk Litre 36.00 39.00 42.00 46.00 40.00 42.00

14 Pure Ghee Litre 363.70 363.33 358.00 365.00 316.75 379.00

15 Onion Kg. 25.00 19.99 19.80 20.00 16.00 18.65

16 Chillies Dry 100 gms. 25.13 21.50 27.00 25.00 24.00 24.00

17 Sugar Kg. 35.32 35.00 36.07 35.00 34.82 34.91

18 Gur Kg. 38.44 44.43 47.95 37.33 46.67 49.20

19 Tea Leaf 100gms 32.95 29.20 32.00 32.00 31.20 33.20

20 Fire Wood 40 Kg. 543.13 343.32 320.00 160.00 200.00 273.34

21 Soft Coke 40 Kg. - - - - - -

22 Kerosene Oil Litre 14.95 15.58 14.00 15.05 14.59 14.05

23 Toilet Soap 75gms. 13.64 16.88 15.38 15.00 15.00 15.75

24 Washing Soap 225 gms. 13.00 25.80 10.47 21.60 7.66 22.50

Page 51: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

861

Vadodara Himachal

Pradesh

Faridabad Yamuna-

nagar

Srinagar Bokaro Giridih Jamshed-

pur

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

29.86 19.10 29.00 45.00 18.56 26.42 26.01 26.25

19.11 16.27 16.60 16.66 - 20.00 25.00 22.00

26.00 10.75 19.80 19.37 21.99 22.00 20.00 26.00

25.00 - - - - - - -

65.00 78.07 79.20 75.75 - 75.00 70.00 72.00

85.00 95.21 97.75 107.75 94.80 104.00 100.00 100.00

64.00 72.17 70.00 71.55 71.47 68.00 65.00 67.20

81.97 147.55 - - - - - 130.00

- 109.80 89.20 79.85 110.67 100.00 88.00 88.20

80.00 79.26 78.00 75.55 87.13 80.00 89.20 80.00

360.00 289.57 336.00 322.75 340.00 380.00 360.00 352.50

140.00 167.60 152.00 140.00 197.33 124.00 140.00 141.50

44.00 34.09 45.00 45.00 31.33 40.00 35.00 38.00

44.00 39.92 40.00 40.00 - 35.29 - 38.00

385.00 363.57 343.90 370.00 298.65 350.00 343.90 385.00

20.00 19.03 19.60 20.00 25.08 17.20 18.80 17.60

24.00 24.79 21.00 22.00 29.00 16.00 25.00 24.00

32.87 26.61 30.04 34.59 13.50 36.60 36.00 37.00

48.00 37.89 40.00 39.80 - 40.00 40.00 40.00

32.00 34.23 32.00 32.80 35.20 40.00 39.20 31.20

360.00 236.83 400.00 375.00 188.33 280.00 298.00 200.00

0.00 - - - 378.33 400.00 268.00 400.00

13.91 14.66 14.21 14.00 17.50 15.13 14.62 14.29

16.50 16.21 15.75 16.50 15.00 17.25 18.00 17.25

19.80 11.99 10.13 11.25 9.00 26.10 22.50 12.50

Page 52: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

862

Table A.1.1.3 Contd.

Sl.

N

o

Article Unit Jharia Kodar

-ma

Ranchi

Hatia

Bangalore Belgaum Hubli

Dharwar

Mercara

1 2 3 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

1 Rice Kg. 25.92 20.63 23.21 39.89 30.94 33.34 29.93

2 Wheat:

a. Wheat Whole Kg. 19.61 17.40 27.82 29.83 26.45 28.33 31.77

b. Wheat Atta Kg. 21.09 20.90 22.77 26.21 0.00 0.00 44.28

3 Jowar Kg. - - - - 26.50 24.40 -

4 Arhar Dal Kg. 71.36 70.00 74.58 72.95 68.10 76.20 83.05

5 Moong Dal Kg. 101.46 91.20 107.00 110.58 94.25 96.50 111.30

6 Masur Dal Kg. 63.96 60.00 69.73 - 69.20 65.35 -

7 Groundnut oil Litre - - - 87.85 87.79 81.27 112.88

8 Mustard Oil Litre 84.27 86.45 88.50 - - - -

9 Vanaspati Litre 76.40 77.50 83.48 69.58 80.75 76.64 86.53

10 Goat Meat/

Mutton

Kg. 374.20 357.00 388.67 411.67 370.00 365.00 366.25

11 Fish Fresh Kg. 126.10 140.00 135.50 136.67 124.00 95.50 143.75

12 Milk Litre 36.00 40.00 40.00 30.50 42.00 45.00 30.00

13 Dairy Milk Litre - - 36.00 30.00 30.00 32.00 -

14 Pure Ghee Litre 364.41 357.50 320.00 360.66 344.00 344.00 -

15 Onion Kg. 18.12 18.20 17.70 21.90 13.50 16.13 18.88

16 Chillies Dry 100 gms. 22.00 16.00 25.17 13.00 14.00 15.50 8.75

17 Sugar Kg. 36.35 36.00 38.32 32.30 33.54 35.36 35.17

18 Gur Kg. 37.82 39.20 39.00 49.33 39.60 40.00 45.60

19 Tea Leaf 100gms 32.80 34.00 40.00 30.50 30.00 25.00 33.00

20 Fire Wood 40 Kg. 320.00 271.00 377.00 226.68 288.00 300.00 160.00

21 Soft Coke 40 Kg. 240.00 358.00 360.00 - - - -

22 Kerosene Oil Litre 14.26 15.00 14.60 17.50 17.50 17.50 17.50

23 Toilet Soap 75gm 16.95 13.80 17.25 17.25 17.25 17.25 17.25

24 Washing Soap 225 gms. 23.68 20.45 7.50 14.40 14.40 7.51 .14.40

Page 53: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

863

Mysore Erna-

kulam

Munda

-ayam

Quilon Bhopal Chhind

-wara

Indore Jabalpur Mumbai

39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

41.36 28.09 31.43 26.73 32.48 25.91 27.20 23.05 44.77

-

33.95 6.70 11.77 6.36 20.97 18.43 27.73 23.20 28.01

35.50 34.50 33.60 28.00 20.67 22.00 21.00 21.20 -

- - - - - - - - 34.73

79.00 76.15 77.40 63.30 70.00 66.30 73.38 69.60 82.44

100.00 99.20 98.87 100.60 100.00 98.00 109.00 97.60 106.23

67.75 70.73 68.00 69.00 70.00 60.20 72.80

83.26 116.00 120.00 160.00 86.45 151.00 125.70

- - - - 90.00 90.00 81.90 99.00 98.76

95.50 - - 75.00 70.00 80.00 69.00 100.53

340.00 420.00 420.00 480.00 400.00 280.00 380.00 299.00 386.88

88.00 149.00 138.00 154.00 220.00 100.00 192.92 144.00 627.34

32.00 35.00 34.33 36.00 45.00 42.00 38.00 47.40 56.16

30.00 35.00 35.00 42.00 38.00 42.00 36.00 34.00

364.00 415.00 400.00 316.75 400.00 323.99 376.56

20.00 28.80 30.07 27.90 20.00 15.00 13.38 15.05 19.42

10.00 9.29 10.70 10.50 16.33 14.50 16.64 14.80 22.17

34.78 35.05 35.23 35.64 35.72 34.28 33.63 34.65 37.75

50.00 49.30 49.07 49.50 40.00 29.00 39.63 36.00 56.98

33.00 30.50 30.00 30.50 35.20 32.80 32.80 32.80 39.59

220.00 80.00 216.00 176.00 300.00 240.00 320.00 180.00 -

- - - - - - - - -

17.50 16.75 17.00 17.00 15.92 16.85 15.19 15.30 15.11

17.25 18.75 13.60 18.00 17.25 15.75 15.56 15.75 17.02

16.20 14.40 16.90 14.06 27.00 9.00 18.00 27.00 22.84

Page 54: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

864

Table A.1.1.3 Contd.

Sl.

N

o

Article Unit Nagpur Nasik Pune Sholapur Angul-

Talcher

Rourkel

a

Puducherry

1 2 3 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

1 Rice Kg. 35.89 27.81 43.83 27.45 25.76 27.81 41.38

2 Wheat:

a. Wheat

Whole

Kg. 26.53 20.86 30.75 17.13 7.54 - 28.26

b. Wheat Atta Kg. 25.50 25.00 - 26.50 17.31 15.97 43.50

3 Jowar Kg. - 30.00 32.00 31.00 - - -

4 Arhar Dal Kg. 72.38 71.33 76.33 70.00 70.00 70.00 79.50

5 Moong Dal Kg. 107.9

2

102.50 120.0

0

103.75 90.00 112.50 102.20

6 Masur Dal Kg. 66.75 64.00 74.25 69.50 90.00 80.00 -

7 Groundnut oil Litre 90.02 100.10 117.8

4

78.26 160.00 - 74.21

8 Mustard Oil Litre 110.5

0

134.00 - - 90.00 93.28 -

9 Vanaspati Litre 89.50 62.79 82.16 80.00 85.00 99.00 81.00

10 Goat

Meat/Mutton

Kg. 386.6

7

395.00 396.6

7

360.00 365.00 360.00 440.00

11 Fish Fresh Kg. 201.6

7

600.00 781.6

7

150.00 170.00 159.00 630.00

12 Milk Litre 43.67 49.67 48.00 42.00 30.00 32.00 30.00

13 Dairy Milk Litre 36.33 38.00 32.00 38.00 - 30.00 26.00

14 Pure Ghee Litre 348.3

3

385.00 430.0

0

- 405.00 - 364.00

15 Onion Kg. 17.63 12.00 16.83 15.00 18.00 22.00 16.20

16 Chillies Dry 100 gms. 16.00 42.00 25.50 29.50 15.00 15.00 13.70

17 Sugar Kg. 34.80 34.48 33.67 33.50 36.00 36.00 34.85

18 Gur Kg. 49.83 48.00 47.83 36.00 40.00 - 51.30

19 Tea Leaf 100gms 38.78 36.80 28.80 23.12 33.20 30.00 42.38

20 Fire Wood 40 Kg. 300.0

0

240.00 293.3

2

320.00 240.00 280.00 400.00

21 Soft Coke 40 Kg. - - - - 200.00 - -

22 Kerosene Oil Litre 15.31 14.88 15.25 16.10 14.21 13.82 14.25

23 Toilet Soap 75gms 17.12 17.25 17.25 17.25 17.25 17.25 17.25

24 Washing Soap 225 gms. 22.50 18.00 8.33 26.10 22.50 18.00 14.85

Page 55: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

865

Amritsar Jalandhar Ludhiana Ajmer Bhilwara Jaipur Chennai Coimba

-tore

Coonoor Madurai

55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

28.00 26.00 25.00 38.00 33.00 39.75 26.18 23.77 17.13 29.48

- 16.00 - 21.91 17.91 20.89 18.40 21.75 9.38 21.59

22.00 21.00 20.00 24.00 25.00 23.00 40.17 43.00 43.75 44.00

- - - - - - - - - -

76.84 70.00 70.00 80.00 77.50 73.50 77.42 82.39 73.55 86.38

105.00 90.00 92.00 110.00 103.30 103.75 106.19 103.70 99.05 111.50

78.64 80.00 72.00 62.50 67.50 66.50 - - 66.80 -

- - - 115.00 135.00 140.00 89.52 97.29 101.81 94.57

95.20 105.00 104.00 115.00 115.00 100.00 - - -

73.66 70.00 74.00 70.00 - 78.00 74.42 - - 82.00

320.00 340.00 340.00 320.00 290.00 330.00 483.33 440.00 430.00 405.00

200.00 150.00 160.00 250.00 195.00 - 517.50 610.00 171.00 120.00

40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 36.50 44.00 - 28.00 32.00 30.00

- 40.00 40.00 34.00 33.00 34.00 27.00 31.00 34.00 30.00

375.00 360.00 385.00 370.00 345.00 334.85 370.00 450.00 309.40 364.00

17.80 17.50 20.00 18.75 17.50 14.00 18.00 24.10 28.25 20.00

29.64 25.00 25.30 23.00 21.75 27.00 17.75 10.50 11.00 9.50

35.28 35.45 35.80 36.75 35.90 36.63 21.36 27.90 27.49 26.47

- - - 34.00 36.00 39.50 51.75 48.95 - 46.00

34.00 34.80 34.00 32.80 34.00 32.80 42.33 42.75 43.00 42.00

380.00 360.00 320.00 290.00 245.00 320.00 342.67 320.00 280.00 200.00

- - - - - - - - - -

15.04 14.91 14.31 17.25 17.25 17.25 13.70 13.90 14.10 14.00

15.75 15.00 16.88 16.50 16.50 16.50 18.25 19.60 18.75 18.38

10.13 11.25 14.63 11.93 10.29 10.80 14.48 22.50 14.40 25.65

Page 56: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

866

Table A.1.1.3 Concld.

Sl.

No

Article Unit Salem Tiruchir

apally

Tripura Agra Ghaziab-

ad

Kanpur Lucknow

1 2 3 65 66 67 68 69 70 71

1 Rice Kg. 30.17 23.23 17.36 27.79 30.00 38.95 30.16

2 Wheat:

a. Wheat Whole Kg. 21.88 17.55 - 15.70 11.96 14.56 19.42

b. Wheat Atta Kg. 40.50 40.00 14.18 20.00 19.32 20.23 22.00

3 Jowar Kg. - - - - - - -

4 Arhar Dal Kg. 75.50 72.00 - 72.00 74.00 72.67 74.35

5 Moong Dal Kg. 101.50 97.50 79.54 115.40 95.00 99.43 119.25

6 Masur Dal Kg. - 65.50 80.83 65.00 67.00 65.47 70.00

7 Groundnut oil Litre 75.57 90.50 - - - - -

8 Mustard Oil Litre - - 93.00 70.98 80.00 77.17 90.00

9 Vanaspati Litre - - - 72.00 80.00 77.00 78.00

10 Goat

Meat/Mutton

Kg. 400.00 440.00 416.00 320.00 360.00 338.33 380.00

11 Fish Fresh Kg. 640.00 65.00 209.00 128.40 140.00 155.33 162.50

12 Milk Litre 30.00 40.00 38.80 40.00 42.00 43.67 40.00

13 Dairy Milk Litre 27.00 37.00 - 36.66 39.70 35.66 40.32

14 Pure Ghee Litre - 400.00 - 340.00 370.00 380.00 390.00

15 Onion Kg. 26.80 20.00 23.34 16.48 20.00 18.80 20.00

16 Chillies Dry 100

gms 10.58 10.55 23.28 28.00 18.00 18.00 28.00

17 Sugar Kg. 15.11 21.01 22.88 35.91 36.00 34.54 36.19

18 Gur Kg. - 52.00 48.40 39.20 40.00 38.82 43.38

19 Tea Leaf 100gms 41.50 42.00 20.00 34.00 34.80 33.20 33.30

20 Fire Wood 40 Kg. 160.00 160.00 131.00 320.00 450.00 400.00 320.00

21 Soft Coke 40 Kg. - - - - - 516.00 -

22 Kerosene Oil Litre 14.00 13.90 15.53 15.29 15.99 15.80 15.73

23 Toilet Soap 75gms 18.38 17.81 13.80 15.00 15.00 16.50 17.25

24 Washing Soap 225gms 14.18 14.63 12.79 25.38 11.25 10.13 26.10

# Items do not feature in index basket of respective centres.

Notes 1. “The prices are average prices based on individual quotations obtained from

selected outlets in a given centre and are not comparable between centres as they

relate to different varieties of varying specifications”.

Page 57: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

867

Varanasi Asansol Darjee-

ling

Durga-

pur

Haldia Howrah Jalpai

guri

Kolkata Rani-

ganj

Sili-

guri

72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81

32.91 31.64 21.11 29.87 33.88 31.61 22.49 29.41 32.91 18.44

17.71 9.12 14.12 6.73 6.86 6.75 12.10 6.73 - 15.30

20.00 21.96 2.31 15.71 13.02 18.74 3.03 19.12 17.51 5.32

- - - - - - - - - -

72.00 75.00 80.00 75.00 77.47 80.00 80.00 75.30 72.00 81.00

110.00 110.00 120.00 120.00 120.53 120.00 106.25 127.10 110.00 105.00

68.00 80.00 90.00 82.00 90.00 89.13 80.50 88.20 80.00 85.00

- - - - 180.00 - - - - -

87.36 91.68 87.36 83.72 89.18 95.32 91.46 95.55 83.72 95.55

80.00 95.00 78.50 92.00 - 90.00 89.00 90.00 90.00 85.00

340.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 421.67 415.00 435.20 380.00 406.67

160.00 242.50 170.00 300.00 250.00 255.00 225.00 263.00 250.00 220.00

45.00 32.00 27.50 34.00 35.00 32.00 35.63 34.00 30.00 36.67

44.00 28.00 - 19.00 28.00 28.00 - 28.00 - -

359.20 434.40 415.00 470.60 506.80 371.05 - 434.40 325.80 -

20.00 18.75 25.00 20.75 20.00 23.13 16.00 22.30 19.33 19.27

32.00 15.50 15.00 24.00 24.00 16.00 12.00 15.70 14.00 16.00

36.43 34.91 33.86 37.84 36.77 36.51 31.42 37.83 35.87 33.02

40.00 45.00 50.00 40.00 42.00 45.00 42.00 45.00 36.00 45.00

32.80 33.20 24.00 33.00 34.00 32.80 33.30 33.20 34.00 32.00

480.00 280.00 493.33 220.00 240.00 290.00 225.00 320.00 140.00 286.67

560.00 400.00 640.00 420.00 480.00 480.00 - 480.00 150.00 -

15.90 15.41 15.39 15.50 16.00 25.83 15.20 25.70 16.00 14.72

17.25 17.25 13.80 17.25 16.50 17.25 17.25 17.25 16.50 9.44

26.10 22.50 22.50 18.00 18.76 20.45 22.50 18.00 22.50 18.76

2. Besides these articles, retail prices of a large number of articles (including House Rent)

being paid by working class families and utilized in the compilation of CPI Nos. (on base:

2001=100) for industrial workers are not being published due to resource constraint.

3. The price data of the remaining articles for any particular centre can be made available to

the users on their specific demand.

Page 58: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

868

1.2.Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers

Table A.1.2.1 (a) – Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural

Sl.

No.

State

Linking factor

for General

Index a

General Index Food Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 Andhra Pradesh 4.84 822 829 822 833

2 Assam b 758 762 749 754

3 Bihar 6.22 707 715 662 669

4 Gujarat 5.34 777 784 783 790

5 Haryana * 852 846 880 870

6 Himachal Pradesh * 637 636 661 657

7 Jammu & Kashmir 5.98 742 748 759 764

8 Karnataka 5.81 824 835 827 838

9 Kerala 6.56 785 796 788 800

10 Madhya Pradesh 6.04 716 720 680 687

11 Maharashtra 5.85 810 820 828 840

12 Manipur * 730 741 638 652

13 Meghalaya * 765 778 756 771

14 Orissa 6.05 716 727 672 686

15 Punjab c 829 832 868 869

16 Rajasthan 6.15 838 839 803 801

17 Tamil Nadu 5.67 774 782 699 707

18 Tripura * 690 695 690 696

19 Uttar Pradesh 6.60 745 749 761 766

20 West Bengal 5.73 742 740 694 688

All-India 5.89 771 777 751 757

a = The indices for a given month of old base (1960-61) can be obtained by multiplying the

index number of new base (1986-87) of that month by the relevant linking factors which

are applicable to Agricultural Labourers only.

Page 59: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

869

Labourers (Group-wise and General) (Base: 1986-87=100)

Pan, Supari, Tobacco

& Intoxicants Index

Fuel & Light Index Clothing, Bedding &

Footwear Index

Miscellaneous Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

1093 1109 831 796 796 800 751 756

1044 1052 757 751 754 756 641 645

861 875 999 1001 880 894 687 702

1136 1165 685 686 672 676 756 760

852 859 1150 1149 794 791 615 617

1003 1006 367 369 568 573 722 727

1255 1259 555 564 718 724 755 757

1158 1155 654 662 763 781 849 867

1244 1245 761 770 721 730 683 694

1115 1118 882 867 727 727 697 701

1000 1016 879 881 664 669 708 713

1118 1129 1487 1481 773 782 624 624

892 911 743 744 819 822 721 721

1046 1033 1006 1009 856 859 634 638

974 991 1132 1136 637 641 629 633

1203 1212 1159 1167 792 795 756 762

1323 1350 914 919 734 737 925 927

1009 1005 479 479 712 718 686 691

909 909 789 790 724 725 612 615

862 856 933 933 1087 1098 810 833

1069 1079 873 870 768 774 732 740

b & c = To obtain linking factors for Assam and Punjab, please consult article in February, 1996

issue of the Indian Labour Journal.

* = Indices compiled and published for the first time w.e.f. November, 1995.

Page 60: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

870

Table A.1.2.1 (b) – Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Rural

Sl.

No

State General Index Food Index Pan, Supari,

Tobacco &

Intoxicants Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Andhra Pradesh 820 826 821 832 1096 1112

2 Assam 765 767 760 763 1045 1051

3 Bihar 710 719 661 668 864 878

4 Gujarat 776 783 786 793 1128 1157

5 Haryana 845 839 885 874 880 888

6 Himachal Pradesh 673 673 691 690 1102 1104

7 Jammu & Kashmir 736 743 748 754 1332 1335

8 Karnataka 818 830 816 828 1161 1161

9 Kerala 784 796 784 797 1241 1248

10 Madhya Pradesh 735 740 681 688 1102 1109

11 Maharashtra 806 817 819 833 1004 1019

12 Manipur 733 744 638 652 1113 1125

13 Meghalaya 762 774 753 768 904 923

14 Orissa 716 727 673 686 1040 1028

15 Punjab 822 825 867 869 964 980

16 Rajasthan 825 825 795 792 1178 1187

17 Tamil Nadu 769 777 707 717 1335 1361

18 Tripura 680 685 677 683 1023 1020

19 Uttar Pradesh 744 748 763 768 909 910

20 West Bengal 753 751 696 692 868 862

All India 773 780 753 760 1077 1087

Page 61: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

871

Labourers (Group wise and General) (Base: 1986-87=100)

Fuel & Light Index Clothing, Bedding &

Footwear Index

Miscellaneous Index

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

Apr.,

2014

May,

2014

9 10 11 12 13 14

825 791 781 785 753 758

752 746 757 759 636 640

1001 1002 866 884 692 707

686 687 682 686 752 756

1149 1149 747 744 610 612

377 379 662 669 725 727

550 559 720 723 735 738

655 663 737 750 890 909

758 767 734 743 700 710

880 865 850 853 709 714

872 874 732 738 709 715

1490 1485 785 794 613 614

743 744 731 733 722 723

1002 1005 848 850 632 636

1122 1126 697 701 627 631

1167 1175 789 788 719 729

906 911 684 686 848 852

477 477 707 712 658 664

793 793 756 757 577 580

961 962 1066 1072 826 845

870 868 778 783 729 737

Page 62: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

872

Table A.1.2.2 (a) - State-wise monthly consumer prices of selected articles of Agricultural

Sl.

No.

Item Unit Andhra Pradesh Assam Bihar Gujarat

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1. Rice Kg. 17.14 22.05 17.14 19.01

2. Wheat: - -

(a) Wheat whole Kg. - - 13.63 5.19

(b) Wheat Atta Kg. - 24.74 19.25 22.68

3. Jowar Kg. 23.83 -

4. Bajra: - -

(a) Bajra whole Kg. 19.56 - 16.50

(b) Bajra Atta Kg. - - 18.33

5. Maize: - -

(a) Maize whole Kg. - - 13.39 15.65

(b) Maize Atta Kg. - - 19.99

6. Ragi Kg. 26.70 -

7. Arhar Dal Kg. 66.93 76.33 71.70 69.57

8. Groundnut Oil Litre 87.60 - - 94.04

9. Mustard Oil Litre - 107.50 93.74

10. Goat Meat/Mutton Kg. 386.27 306.57 345.26 295.34

11. Fish Fresh Kg. 153.73 242.55 141.73 122.38

12. Milk Litre 36.02 44.20 31.01 40.93

13. Onion Kg. 14.24 23.92 18.05 15.87

14. Chillies Dry 100Gms 10.56 14.99 11.23 13.42

15. Potato Kg. 24.19 20.67 19.08 19.51

16. Sugar Kg. 18.39 21.62 36.12 29.70

17. Gur Kg. 43.22 54.89 36.66 41.03

18. Tea Leaf 100Gms 38.28 21.46 28.97 23.21

19. Firewood 40 Kg. 144.29 130.48 231.02 70.52

20. Kerosene Oil Litre 15.00 16.96 16.84 14.60

Page 63: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

873

Labourers for the month May, 2014 (Base: 1986-87=100)

Haryana Himachal

Pradesh

Jammu &

Kashmir

Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh

8 9 10 11 12 13

25.26 20.44 22.53 8.37 22.66 15.82

- - - - - -

- - - - 4.12 8.78

18.64 10.95 20.65 26.91 32.81 19.96

- - - 22.59 - 17.84

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

11.18 - - - - -

- - - - - -

19.50 - 18.45 - - 13.57

- 17.00 - - - -

- - - 19.90 - -

75.75 81.43 - 71.78 70.37 71.69

- - - 92.01 - 114.23

79.86 105.58 101.85 - - 84.95

308.87 273.33 317.88 333.74 430.06 296.45

90.00 152.00 186.43 286.16 79.84 121.60

39.91 33.44 30.17 28.79 34.63 32.44

16.23 19.11 21.01 14.36 31.84 15.46

13.82 15.33 21.13 11.10 9.61 11.71

18.38 18.56 22.17 25.83 29.16 18.96

25.59 17.63 15.11 21.19 31.26 15.94

35.00 36.33 37.82 40.16 44.78 31.97

21.41 28.78 33.94 31.38 25.75 19.68

257.00 N.A. 210.22 104.98 167.66 164.74

14.05 15.28 14.46 16.98 16.65 16.11

Page 64: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

874

Table A.1.2.2 (a) concld.

Sl.

No.

Item Unit Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Orissa

1 2 3 14 15 16 17

1. Rice Kg. 14.15 17.50 16.12 17.81

2. Wheat: - - -

(a) Wheat whole Kg. 8.35 - - -

(b) Wheat Atta Kg. - - 24.67 18.43

3. Jowar Kg. 19.56 - - -

4. Bajra: - - - -

(a) Bajra whole Kg. 19.00 - - -

(b) Bajra Atta Kg. - - - -

5. Maize:

(a) Maize whole Kg. - - - -

(b) Maize Atta Kg. - - -

6. Ragi Kg. - - 19.87

7. Arhar Dal Kg. 70.46 84.75 81.75 72.22

8. Groundnut Oil Litre 107.42 - - 85.53

9. Mustard Oil Litre - 111.33 101.78 97.67

10. Goat Meat/Mutton Kg. 355.10 - - 349.26

11. Fish Fresh Kg. 121.83 183.33 178.89 136.28

12. Milk Litre 39.31 41.67 40.56 24.10

13. Onion Kg. 13.70 26.44 32.00 17.44

14. Chillies Dry 100 gm. 11.32 16.11 17.22 12.06

15. Potato Kg. 22.69 21.44 21.89 17.03

16. Sugar Kg. 24.81 42.00 23.33 36.81

17. Gur Kg. 22.22 - - 38.47

18. Tea Leaf 100 gm. 22.10 18.71 24.56 29.36

19. Firewood 40. Kg. 169.91 247.78 146.11 137.43

20. Kerosene Oil Litre 16.17 21.17 34.44 15.97

- = Items do not feature in the Index Basket.

N.A. = Not Available.

Page 65: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

875

Punjab Rajasthan Tamil

Nadu

Tripura Uttar

Pradesh

West Bengal

18 19 20 21 22 23

28.94 30.29 6.47 18.29 17.60 23.19

- - - -

15.55 10.69 - - 6.96 -

19.43 19.18 36.11 25.50 17.63 12.15

- 20.25 22.90 - 22.73 -

- - - - - -

- 14.63 21.19 - 14.32 -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- 14.85 - - 15.18 -

22.74 - - - -

- - 25.46 - -

- 74.29 75.46 - 71.15 48.96

- 111.49 92.88 - - -

94.15 83.69 113.44 84.56 91.88

307.73 305.50 411.19 431.11 309.01 366.86

- - 165.42 211.11 117.64 141.98

36.96 35.68 28.65 38.89 35.96 27.21

15.41 13.46 23.80 27.33 16.87 17.21

15.16 11.56 10.00 18.22 12.57 13.84

18.05 18.96 29.40 21.00 18.61 14.21

35.64 25.76 13.50 22.44 20.41 31.12

37.63 36.65 46.98 52.89 34.32 38.51

21.01 21.65 41.72 20.11 28.71 20.11

244.68 204.72 178.04 140.25 226.62 184.96

15.70 16.21 14.01 15.40 15.81 14.76

Note:- The prices are average prices based on individual quotations obtained from the selected

outlets of the sample villages of a given State and are not comparable with each other due

to their varying specifications. Besides, the prices of all the items utilised in compilation

of C.P.I. Numbers for Agricultural Labourers are not being published due to resource

constraints.

Page 66: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

876

Table A.1.2.2 (b) - State-wise monthly consumer prices of selected articles of Rural Labourers

Sl.

No.

Item Unit Andhra

Pradesh

Assam Bihar Gujarat Haryana Himachal

Pradesh

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1. Rice Kg. 17.13 22.39 17.17 19.25 25.25 21.77

2. Wheat: - - - - - -

(a) Wheat whole Kg. - - 13.62 5.21 - -

(b) Wheat Atta Kg. - 24.64 19.22 22.61 18.64 11.83

3. Jowar Kg. 23.83 - - - - -

4. Bajra: - - - - - -

(a) Bajra whole Kg. 19.57 - - 16.48 - -

(b) Bajra Atta Kg. - - - 18.28 11.44 -

5. Maize:

(a) Maize whole Kg. - - 13.44 15.65 19.50 -

(b) Maize Atta Kg. - - - 20.10 - 17.00

6. Ragi Kg. 26.65 - - - - -

7. Arhar Dal Kg. 67.04 75.51 71.76 69.57 75.79 81.43

8. Groundnut Oil Litre 87.60 - - 94.06 - -

9. Mustard Oil Litre - 107.46 93.68 94.53 79.95 105.58

10. Goat Meat/Mutton Kg. 386.36 304.09 347.76 296.10 310.15 273.33

11. Fish Fresh Kg. 154.11 244.40 142.31 123.74 90.00 152.00

12. Milk Litre 35.57 44.22 30.99 40.90 40.11 33.44

13. Onion Kg. 14.25 23.88 17.98 15.87 16.22 19.11

14. Chillies Dry 100Gms 10.54 14.53 11.24 13.40 13.81 15.33

15. Potato Kg. 24.25 20.72 19.06 19.51 18.37 18.56

16. Sugar Kg. 19.56 21.76 36.13 29.58 25.72 17.63

17. Gur Kg. 43.32 55.76 36.66 41.02 35.00 36.33

18. Tea Leaf 100gms. 38.17 21.43 29.04 23.10 21.41 28.78

19. Firewood 40. Kg. 144.46 129.41 232.39 70.15 257.01 N.A.

20. Kerosene Oil Litre 15.00 17.07 16.84 14.60 14.05 15.28

Page 67: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

877

for the month of May, 2014 (Base: 1986-87=100)

Jammu &

Kashmir

Karnataka Kerala Madhya

Pradesh

Maha-

rashtra

Manipur Megha-

laya

Orissa Punjab

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

20.56 8.67 22.64 15.68 15.27 17.48 16.32 17.82 28.94

- - - - - - - - -

- - 4.08 9.11 8.99 - - - 15.55

20.60 26.96 32.67 19.96 - 24.67 18.48 19.43

- 22.61 - 17.75 19.46 - - -

- - - - - - - -

- - - - 19.14 - - -

- - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - -

18.22 - - 13.60 - - - -

- - - - - - - 22.78

- 19.85 - - - - 19.89 -

- 71.80 70.73 71.36 70.64 84.75 81.75 72.34 -

- 92.00 - 114.64 107.07 - - 85.46 -

101.89 - - 85.21 - 111.33 101.78 97.84 94.23

318.24 335.60 426.60 296.26 357.16 - - 350.59 307.93

186.43 288.52 80.01 121.55 120.76 183.33 178.89 136.34 -

30.17 28.71 34.64 32.50 40.05 41.67 40.56 24.11 36.88

21.81 14.42 31.88 15.52 13.72 26.44 32.00 17.44 15.39

20.66 11.11 9.60 11.67 11.25 16.11 17.22 12.06 15.16

22.43 25.88 29.08 18.94 22.70 21.44 21.89 17.08 18.05

15.22 22.00 31.50 16.37 25.53 42.00 23.33 36.78 35.64

37.51 40.14 44.70 31.92 22.35 - - 38.51 37.66

32.51 31.38 25.93 19.69 22.13 18.71 24.56 29.33 21.01

206.78 104.94 167.60 164.65 169.62 247.78 146.11 137.88 246.10

14.90 16.99 16.64 16.11 16.01 21.17 34.44 15.95 15.66

- = Items do not feature in the Index Basket.

N.A.= Not available

Page 68: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

878

Table A.1.2.2 (b)-Concld.

Sl.

No.

Item Unit Rajasthan Tamil

Nadu

Tripura Uttar

Pradesh

West

Bengal

1 2 3 19 20 21 22 23

1. Rice Kg. 30.72 7.07 18.08 17.64 23.21

2. Wheat: - - - - -

(a) Wheat whole Kg. 10.76 - - 7.28 -

(b) Wheat Atta Kg. 19.15 36.16 25.50 17.52 12.46

3. Jowar Kg. 20.21 22.55 - 22.57 -

4. Bajra: - - - -

(a) Bajra whole Kg. 14.90 21.19 - 14.36 -

(b) Bajra Atta Kg. - - - -

5. Maize:

( a ) Maize whole Kg. 14.90 - - 15.14 -

(b) Maize Atta Kg. - - - - -

6. Ragi Kg. - 25.45 - - -

7. Arhar Dal Kg. 74.67 75.44 - 71.17 53.45

8. Groundnut Oil Litre 110.81 93.30 - - -

9. Mustard Oil Litre 83.84 - 113.44 84.54 91.85

10. Goat Meat/Mutton Kg. 305.10 412.18 431.11 309.47 368.35

11. Fish Fresh Kg. - 165.54 211.11 116.42 140.77

12. Milk Litre 35.72 28.63 38.89 35.93 27.31

13. Onion Kg. 13.43 23.81 27.33 16.92 17.21

14. Chillies Dry 100gm. 11.58 9.98 18.22 12.56 13.86

15. Potato Kg. 18.46 29.68 21.00 18.76 14.26

16. Sugar Kg. 27.68 13.57 16.02 19.32 31.12

17. Gur Kg. 37.50 46.65 52.89 34.27 38.50

18. Tea Leaf 100 gm. 21.65 41.65 20.11 28.39 20.13

19. Firewood 40. Kg. 205.63 177.87 140.25 228.12 186.27

20. Kerosene Oil Litre 16.23 14.01 15.40 15.79 14.78

Note:-The prices are average prices based on individual quotations obtained from the selected outlets of the

sample villages of a given State and are not comparable with each other due to their varying

specifications. Besides, the prices of all the items utilized in compilation of C.P.I. Numbers. for

Rural Labourers are not being published due to resource constraints.

Page 69: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

879

2. WAGES AND EARNINGS

Table A.2.1 (a) - Average Daily Wage Rates for Agricultural Occupations in Rural India during

May, 2014 (By States and Sex).

( in Rupees)

Sl.

No

States Ploughing/Tilling Workers Sowing (including Planting/

Transplanting/Weeding workers)

Men Women Children Men Women Children

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Andhra Pradesh 263.44 - - 158.60 147.23 -

2 Assam 216.00 @ - 196.07 171.67 -

3 Bihar 217.40 - - 203.71 168.03 @

4 Gujarat 189.82 @ - 176.67 169.81 -

5 Haryana 371.67 - - 330.00 302.00 -

6 Himachal Pradesh 381.67 - - 337.50 @ -

7 Jammu & Kashmir 401.67 @ - 385.77 @ -

8 Karnataka 276.82 @ - 227.04 159.66 @

9 Kerala 675.14 - - 586.62 445.42 -

10 Madhya Pradesh 172.56 @ - 162.00 141.52 @

11 Maharashtra 247.00 163.00 - 206.58 138.41 -

12 Manipur 255.56 @ - 243.33 @ -

13 Meghalaya 242.00 @ - 201.11 138.75 @

14 Orissa 189.76 - - 148.89 @ -

15 Punjab @ - - 288.33 @ -

16 Rajasthan 296.00 @ - 271.67 @ -

17 Tamil Nadu 452.27 - - 296.21 179.38 -

18 Tripura 210.00 - - 210.00 - -

19 Uttar Pradesh 192.71 @ - 195.97 160.17 @

20 West Bengal 285.39 @ - 194.48 180.12 -

All India 264.11 195.57 - 226.55 183.19 104.07

Page 70: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

880

Table A.2.1 (a) Contd.

Sl. No States Harvesting/Winnowing/

Threshing workers

Picking Workers (including

Tea, Cotton, Tobacco & other

commercial crops)*

Men Women Children Men Women Children

1 2 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 Andhra Pradesh 251.76 164.16 @ 208.36 155.17 @

2 Assam 198.33 189.62 - @ @ -

3 Bihar 197.39 177.06 @ @ @ @

4 Gujarat 169.14 165.69 - 160.42 155.65 -

5 Haryana 335.00 327.78 - @ @ -

6 Himachal Pradesh 284.56 290.67 - - - -

7 Jammu & Kashmir 351.36 @ - - - -

8 Karnataka 221.20 147.31 @ 224.17 146.07 @

9 Kerala 519.14 402.05 - - - -

10 Madhya Pradesh 159.60 143.33 @ 167.14 152.86 @

11 Maharashtra 216.11 157.36 @ 187.78 162.78 @

12 Manipur 273.75 228.33 - - - -

13 Meghalaya @ @ - @ @ -

14 Orissa 180.20 178.61 - 146.00 @ -

15 Punjab 325.79 @ - @ @ -

16 Rajasthan 282.69 218.75 - - - -

17 Tamil Nadu 343.88 231.90 - @ 182.50 -

18 Tripura 210.00 - - - - -

19 Uttar Pradesh 218.11 183.26 135.00 @ @ -

20 West Bengal 194.79 185.77 - @ @ -

All India 226.77 189.11 145.13 190.27 158.39 165.63

Page 71: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

881

Table A.2.1 (a) Contd.

( in Rupees)

Horticulture Workers

( including Nursery growers)

Fishermen Inland Fishermen Costal/Deep Sea

Men Women Children Men Women Children Men Women Children

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

@ @ - 171.90 @ - - - -

- - - @ - - - - -

159.38 148.13 - 285.56 - - - - -

174.60 @ - @ - - - - -

@ - - @ - - @ - -

@ @ - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - -

228.46 159.62 - 227.50 - - @ - -

@ @ - - - - - - -

120.00 106.67 - @ - - - - -

225.00 139.29 - @ @ - @ - -

@ @ - - - - - - -

158.33 120.00 - - - - - - -

@ @ - @ - - - - -

261.67 - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - -

309.64 156.98 - @ - - - - -

- - - - - - - - -

@ @ - @ - - - - -

241.63 @ - 380.90 - - @ - -

215.89 151.51 - 279.17 150.00 - @ - -

Page 72: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

882

Table A.2.1 (a) Contd.

Sl.

No

States Loggers and Wood Cutters Animal husbandry workers: including

Poultry workers, dairy workers &

Herdsman

Men Women Children Men Women Children

1 2 24 25 26 27 28 29

1 Andhra Pradesh 261.08 @ - 157.05 @ @

2 Assam 212.00 - - 216.67 - -

3 Bihar 260.13 @ - 163.26 130.45 94.83

4 Gujarat 189.00 @ - 139.29 145.00 -

5 Haryana @ - - 272.00 @ -

6 Himachal Pradesh @ - - @ @ -

7 Jammu & Kashmir 478.75 - - 397.14 - -

8 Karnataka 278.33 - - 205.53 151.00 @

9 Kerala 922.82 - - 521.90 - -

10 Madhya Pradesh 147.04 128.33 - 103.02 90.25 75.10

11 Maharashtra 244.93 @ - 168.92 130.00 @

12 Manipur @ - - 231.43 - -

13 Meghalaya 190.00 - - 145.56 116.00 -

14 Orissa 208.96 - - 120.56 105.71 @

15 Punjab @ - - 223.92 @ -

16 Rajasthan 204.29 @ - 193.33 @ -

17 Tamil Nadu 394.99 @ - 349.00 @ -

18 Tripura 310.00 - - 210.00 - -

19 Uttar Pradesh 261.00 @ - 205.38 @ -

20 West Bengal 281.10 - - 164.74 179.67 102.96

All India 301.49 155.95 - 177.48 132.66 84.71

Page 73: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

883

Table A.2.1 (a) Concld.

( in Rupees)

Packaging Labourers General Agricultural

Labourers including Watering

& Irrigation workers etc.

Plant protection workers

(applying pesticides,

treating seeds, etc.)

Men Women Children Men Women Children Men Women Children

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

@ @ - 213.91 139.73 @ 311.79 @ -

@ @ - 188.21 185.00 - @ - -

161.15 @ - 194.77 144.84 @ 236.19 125.00 -

154.29 @ - 148.25 145.00 - 156.67 - -

@ - - 332.73 325.71 - 323.33 - -

@ @ - 302.43 302.00 - @ @ -

@ - - 352.31 @ - @ - -

235.29 168.33 - 200.54 146.90 - 256.82 - -

- - - 574.52 401.17 - 669.95 - -

128.10 118.71 @ 144.88 126.26 110.00 163.00 - -

206.82 135.71 - 195.79 132.65 @ 264.35 @ -

@ - - @ - - - - -

@ - - 176.25 126.25 @ @ - -

@ @ - 172.56 154.50 @ @ - -

300.00 @ - 275.73 @ - 289.60 - -

@ @ - 266.15 235.00 - @ - -

450.00 @ - 318.89 181.80 - 573.92 @ -

- - - 210.00 - - - - -

@ @ - 185.71 162.75 141.85 205.71 @ -

231.81 @ - 202.69 173.20 - 192.87 163.08 -

223.59 169.23 @ 219.40 168.10 119.38 283.05 166.73 -

- = Indicates that the particular category of workers, i.e. men/ women /children were not engaged in that operation either because of their non-availability; or the activity connected with the occupation was not undertaken in the State; or the activity was out of season in the State, etc. * =Picking includes picking of tea, cotton bolls, tobacco & other commercial crops

@ =Number of quotations are less than five.

Page 74: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

884

A.2.1. (b) – Average Daily Wage Rates for Non-agricultural Occupations in Rural India during

Sl

No

States Carpenter Blacksmith Mason

Men Women Children Men Women Children Men Women Children

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 Andhra Pradesh 274.26 - - 215.91 @ @ 327.69 - -

2 Assam 313.73 - - 273.68 - - 341.93 - -

3 Bihar 297.21 - - 264.72 - - 331.32 - -

4 Gujarat 330.83 - - 221.56 - - 370.34 - -

5 Haryana 441.67 - - @ - - 470.00 - -

6 Himachal Pradesh 464.00 - - 381.83 - - 469.56 - -

7 Jammu&Kashmir 472.86 - - 461.25 - - 475.71 - -

8 Karnataka 312.22 - - 274.31 - - 328.39 - -

9 Kerala 685.56 - - 637.07 - - 691.90 - -

10 Madhya Pradesh 205.07 - - 182.35 @ - 257.27 - -

11 Maharashtra 295.66 @ - 254.91 @ - 344.72 - -

12 Manipur 325.56 - - 290.00 - - 344.44 - -

13 Meghalaya 253.33 - - 238.75 - - 262.22 - -

14 Orissa 278.59 - - 178.13 - - 296.47 - -

15 Punjab 419.07 - - 386.00 - - 418.40 - -

16 Rajasthan 397.25 - - 273.64 @ - 471.67 - -

17 Tamil Nadu 482.83 - - 423.39 - - 521.66 @ -

18 Tripura 310.00 - - 200.00 - - 357.78 - -

19 Uttar Pradesh 331.34 - @ 292.79 - @ 368.36 - -

20 West Bengal 283.98 - - 234.32 - - 295.70 @ @

All India 331.88 @ @ 269.80 264.00 @ 366.18 268.00 @

Page 75: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

885

May, 2014 (By States and Sex)

( in Rupees)

Weavers Beedi Makers Bamboo, Cane Basket Weavers

Men Women Children Men Women Children Men Women Children

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

@ @ - @ 110.03 - 184.55 128.57 -

@ - - @ - - 232.80 - -

@ @ - 152.00 @ - 153.57 @ -

@ - - @ @ - @ - -

@ - - @ - - @ @ -

@ - - - - - @ - -

- - - - - - @ - -

190.00 @ - 139.62 131.22 - 246.67 205.00 -

- @ - @ @ - @ - -

158.33 @ @ 87.14 79.17 @ 134.29 122.86 -

@ @ - @ @ - 246.88 @ -

@ 222.50 - - - - @ @ -

@ @ - - - - @ @ -

@ - - @ @ - @ @ -

@ @ - - - - @ @ -

- - - - - - - - -

@ @ - @ @ - @ - -

300.00 - - 200.00 - - 300.00 - -

- - - @ @ - @ - -

@ @ - 147.50 @ @ 115.48 108.89 @

235.76 184.15 @ 162.31 113.96 72.00 214.47 151.45 @

Page 76: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

886

Table A.2.1 (b) Contd.

( in Rupees)

Sl

No

States Handicraft Workers Plumbers

Men Women Children Men Women Children

1 2 21 22 23 24 25 26

1 Andhra Pradesh @ - - 316.22 - -

2 Assam @ - - 295.71 - -

3 Bihar @ @ - 292.02 - -

4 Gujarat @ @ - 280.71 - -

5 Haryana @ - - 460.00 - -

6 Himachal Pradesh @ - - 449.43 - -

7 Jammu & Kashmir - - - 583.13 - -

8 Karnataka 331.25 @ - 298.75 - -

9 Kerala @ - - 658.15 - -

10 Madhya Pradesh @ @ - 260.00 - -

11 Maharashtra - - - 285.42 - -

12 Manipur @ @ - @ - -

13 Meghalaya @ @ - @ - -

14 Orissa - - - 297.14 - -

15 Punjab - - - 597.36 - -

16 Rajasthan - - - 390.00 - -

17 Tamil Nadu @ - - 478.12 - -

18 Tripura 300.00 - - 300.00 - -

19 Uttar Pradesh @ - - 338.53 - -

20 West Bengal @ @ @ 327.49 @ -

All India 289.54 146.43 @ 385.63 @ -

Page 77: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

887

Table A.2.1 (b) Contd.

( in Rupees)

Electrician Construction Workers (for roads,

dams, industrial & project

construction work & well diggers

LMV & Tractors drivers

Men Women Children Men Women Children Men Women Children

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

319.14 - - 242.36 179.87 - 252.62 - -

300.00 - - 243.57 @ - 267.14 - -

319.52 - - 212.73 173.21 - 249.38 - -

268.70 - - 219.58 182.78 - 194.57 - -

454.55 - - 346.36 345.00 - 372.73 - -

457.33 - - 333.67 - - 317.63 - -

556.88 - - 409.38 @ - 357.83 - -

307.86 - - 289.04 207.11 - 274.06 - -

653.39 - - 780.69 @ - 707.74 - -

216.60 - - 163.54 147.53 124.00 205.23 @ -

312.50 - - 263.28 191.00 - 258.67 @ -

300.00 - - 300.71 @ - 406.11 - -

@ - - 228.57 @ - @ - -

257.96 - - 195.64 145.56 - 227.27 - -

481.94 - - 282.38 265.20 - 299.71 - -

377.00 - - 293.44 260.71 - 320.00 - -

458.46 - - 349.83 248.26 - 444.95 - -

300.00 - - 200.00 - - 288.89 - -

352.08 - - 213.87 187.50 @ 243.46 - -

339.18 - - 239.81 183.11 - 262.19 - -

365.90 - - 271.65 193.09 125.71 280.47 @ -

Page 78: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

888

Table A.2.1 (b) Concld

( in Rupees)

Sl

No

States Non-agricultural labourers

(Including porters, loaders)

Sweeping/ Cleaning Workers

Men Women Children Men Women Children

1 2 36 37 38 39 40 41

1 Andhra Pradesh 221.03 162.11 - 139.29 111.33 -

2 Assam 202.18 180.00 @ 183.33 @ -

3 Bihar 206.51 191.67 - 197.74 @ -

4 Gujarat 173.42 175.83 - 122.14 111.67 -

5 Haryana 324.55 - - 285.00 286.67 -

6 Himachal Pradesh 260.80 @ - @ @ -

7 Jammu & Kashmir 347.19 - - @ 251.33 -

8 Karnataka 212.14 157.73 - 166.65 131.77 -

9 Kerala 603.74 @ - @ 472.00 -

10 Madhya Pradesh 143.04 110.00 80.00 144.67 142.70 @

11 Maharashtra 200.89 114.44 @ 174.37 129.26 @

12 Manipur @ - - @ 152.02 -

13 Meghalaya 194.44 - - @ @ -

14 Orissa 165.00 164.00 - @ @ -

15 Punjab 261.88 - - 191.43 159.17 -

16 Rajasthan 259.55 @ - @ @ -

17 Tamil Nadu 368.21 251.13 @ @ 179.52 -

18 Tripura 200.00 - - 206.67 - -

19 Uttar Pradesh 208.64 177.73 @ 198.17 153.45 @

20 West Bengal 199.60 170.77 - 213.52 @ -

All India 232.41 172.00 107.33 182.85 174.20 @

-= Indicates that the particular category of workers, i.e. men/ women /children were not

engaged in that operation either because of their non-availability; or the activity connected with the occupation was not undertaken in the State; or the activity was out of season in the State, etc.etc

@ = Number of quotations are less than five. Note:- The average daily wage rates at all-India level are derived by dividing the sum total of

wages by number of quotations of all the states taken together.

Page 79: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

889

3. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES

Table A.3.1 Sector/Sphere-wise Number of Disputes, Workers involved and Mandays Lost

due to Industrial Disputes during January to May, 2014 (P)

Sphere/

Item Public Sector Private Sector Total

Number of Number of Number of

Dis-

putes

Workers

Involved

Mandays

Lost

Dis-

putes

Workers

Involved

Mandays

Lost

Dis-

putes

Workers

Involved

Mandays

Lost

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(i) Central Sphere

Strikes 21 329266 626513 2 8040 16160 23 337306 642673

Lockouts - - - - - - - - -

Strikes &

Lockouts

(Total-i)

21 329266 626513 2 8040 16160 23 337306 642673

(ii) State Sphere

Strikes - - - 41 9203 291278 41 9203 291278

Lockouts - - - 14 4599 274626 14 4599 274626

Strikes &

Lockouts

(Total-ii)

- - - 55 13802 565904 55 13802 565904

Grand Total

(Total-i+ ii)

21 329266 626513 57 21842 582064 78 351108 1208577

(P) = Provisional and based on the returns /clarifications received in the Bureau till 2nd

September,

2014.

- = Nil

Page 80: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

890

Table A.3.2- Industrial Disputes (All Strikes and Lockouts)

during January to May, 2014 (P)

State/Union Territory Number of

Disputes Workers

Involved

Mandays Lost

1 2 3 4

Andhra Pradesh 2 1391 77828

Arunachal Pradesh .. .. ..

Assam 1 12500 25000

Bihar 2 21434 53989

Chhattisgarh 1 13379 13379

Goa @ @ @

Gujarat 15 34201 98621

Haryana 5 2429 136319

Himachal Pradesh .. .. ..

Jammu & Kashmir .. .. ..

Jharkhand .. .. ..

Karnataka 2 40332 81640

Kerala 16 40429 139033

Madhya Pradesh 5 39858 71573

Maharashtra 1 9839 9839

Manipur @ @ @

Meghalaya @ @ @

Mizoram # # #

Nagaland .. .. ..

Orissa .. .. ..

Punjab @ @ @

Rajasthan 5 25063 169461

Sikkim # # #

Tamil Nadu 15 3417 118658

Tripura - - -

Uttarakhand 1 16500 33000

Uttar Pradesh 2 9257 17891

West Bengal 4 81042 162084

A & N Islands .. .. ..

Chandigarh @ @ @

Dadra & Nagar Haveli .. .. ..

Delhi @ @ @

Daman & Diu @ @ @

Lakshadweep @ @ @

Puducherry 1 37 262

All India 78 351108 1208577

(P) = Provisional and based on the returns /clarifications received in the Bureau till 2nd

September 2014 - = Nil .. = Not reported @ Partially

received

# = ID Act 1947 is to be implemented

Page 81: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

891

SECTION B

SERIAL STATISTICS

N O T E

1 Prices and Price Indices

1.1. Industrial Worker’s Consumer Price Index

B.1.1.1. All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers – The All India

Consumer Price Index Numbers (General and Food) on base 1982=100 were being published

since their first release with effect from October, 1988 index replacing the old series on base:

1960=100. The Labour Bureau has released the new series of Consumer Price Index Numbers

for Industrial Workers on base: 2001=100 with the index of January, 2006 which has replaced

the previous series on base: 1982=100. The indices for the old base (1960=100) series can be

derived by multiplying the 1982 series indices by the Linking Factors, which are 4.93 for the

general index and 4.98 for the food index. Similarly, the indices for 1982 series can be derived

by multiplying the 2001 series indices by the Linking factors, which are 4.63 and 4.58 for

General and Food group respectively. The Annual Average (Calendar year 1991 to 2013 as well

as Financial year 1991-92 to 2013-2014) and monthly All India Index Numbers (General&

Food) from May, 2013 to May, 2014 have been presented in Table B.1.1.1.

B.1.1.2. Labour Bureau’s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers – Serial Statistics in respect of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers on base 1982=100 and new series on base: 2001=100 (General Index only) for 78 centres are set out in Table B.1.1.2.

1.2 Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers

B.1.2.1 (a) and (b). All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural

Labourers (Base: 1986-87=100) – Serial statistics relating to the All-India Consumer Price

Index Numbers (General and Food) for Agricultural and Rural Labourers on base 1986-87=100

separately for Agricultural Years from 1995-96 to 2012-13, Financial Years from 1995-96 to

2013-14 and Calendar Years from 1995 to 2013, alongwith month-wise indices and 12-monthly

moving averages from May, 2013 to May, 2014 are presented in Tables B.1.2.1 (a) and (b)

respectively.

B.1.2.2 (a) and (b) Labour Bureau’s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural

Labourers and Rural Labourers on Base: 1986-87=100 – Serial statistics in respect of

Consumer Price Index Numbers (General Index) for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers

(Base: 1986-87=100) for 20 States are given in Tables B.1.2.2 (a) and (b) respectively.

Page 82: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

892

1.3. Urban Non-Manual Employees Consumer Price Index / Consumer Price Index for

Urban and Rural Areas

B.1.3. Consumer Price Index Numbers for Urban Non-Manual Employees (Base:1984-85=100) and Consumer Price Index for Urban and Rural Areas on base: 2010=100

Consumer Price Index for Urban Non-Manual Employees on base: 1984-85=100 were compiled and published by the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO), New Delhi. The Price collection for CPI (UNME) was discontinued with effect from April, 2008. As decided by the National Statistical Commission, linked all-India CPI (UNME) numbers for the year 2008 to 2010 are given in Serial Statistics.

The Central Statistics Office (CSO) releases Consumer Price Indices (CPI) on base 2010=100 for all-India and States/UTs separately for rural, urban and combined every month with effect from January, 2011. Consumer Price Index for Urban and Rural areas for the period May, 2013 May, 2014 have been presented in Table B.1.3.

1.4. Wholesale Price Index

B.1.4. All India Index Numbers of Wholesale prices (Base: 2004-05=100) – The current series of Index Numbers of Wholesale Prices in India on base 2004-05=100 was released w.e.f. September, 2010 by replacing the earlier series. These Index Numbers are compiled and published by the Office of the Economic Adviser, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Govt. of India, New Delhi. The indices for the period 1991 to 2012 (Annual Averages) and May, 2013 to May, 2014 (Monthly Figures) are set out in Table B.1.4.

2. Wages and Earnings

B.2.1. Earnings(Basic Wage and Dearness Allowance) of the Lowest-paid Workers/Operatives in Cotton Textile Mills – The information concerning earnings of cotton producing Centres/States received from the State Governments, Employers‟ Associations and Individual Units is presented in Table B.2.1. The earnings of workers include minimum basic wage and dearness Allowance by whatever name called. The dearness allowance is linked to the Working Class Consumer Price Index Numbers of different Centres and varies from month to month according to the variation in the index.

3. Industrial Disputes

B.3.1. Industrial Disputes (All Strikes and Lockouts) – Industrial Disputes Statistics for the Years 2006 to 2014 are presented in Table B.3.1

Page 83: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

893

1. PRICES AND PRICE INDICES

1.1 Industrial Workers’ Consumer Price Index

Table B.1.1.1 – All India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial

Workers (General & Food)

Year/

Month

Annual Average Indices for

Calendar Year Twelve monthly

moving average

of General Index

Financial year

General

Index

Food

Index

Year General

Index

Food

Index

I- Base 1982=100 1991 212 222 - 1991-92 219 230 1992 237 251 - 1992-93 240 254 1993 252 265 - 1993-94 258 272 1994 278 296 - 1994-95 284 304 1995 306 331 - 1995-96 313 337 1996 334 359 - 1996-97 342 369 1997 358 380 - 1997-98 366 388 1998 405 437 - 1998-99 414 445 1999 424 444 - 1999-2000 428 446 2000 441 452 - 2000-01 444 453 2001 458 462 - 2001-02 463 466 2002 477 474 - 2002-03 482 477 2003 496 490 - 2003-04 500 495 2004 514 504 - 2004-05 520 506 2005

536 520 - 2005-06* 540 526 II- Base 2001=100

2006 123 122 2006-07 125 126 2007 131 134 2007-08 133 136

2008 142 149 2008-09 145 153

2009 157 169 2009-10 163 176 2010 176 190 2010-11 180 194

2011 192 204 2011-12 195 206

2012 209 223 2012-13 215 230

2013 232 254 2013-14 236 259

2013 May 228 248 219

June 231 255 221

July 235 259 223

Aug 237 262 225

Sept 238 263 226 Oct 241 268 228

Nov 243 273 231

Dec 239 262 232

2014 Jan 237 256 234

Feb 238 256 235

Mar 239 258 236

Apr 242 264 237

May 244 267 239

*The Financial year average is based on 9 months from April, 2005 to Dec., 2005

Page 84: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

894

Table B.1.1.2- Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers of Industrial Workers

(General Index)

Year/

month

Godavari

khani

Guntur Hyderabad Vijaya

wada

Vishakha-

pattanam

Warrangal DoomDooma

Tinsukia

Base Year 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100

L. Factor 5.60 5.23 * * 4.05

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

I- Base-1982=100

1992 239 227 238 237 216

1993 256 237 249 243 233

1994 281 258 264 274 255

1995 305 283 293 300 281

1996 332 308 319 324 309

1997 356 331 343 344 320

1998 394 377 388 399 362

1999 414 395 410 415 386

2000 431 419 436 440 389

2001 438 438 444 464 384

2002 473 468 469 501 398

2003 504 496 484 526 416

2004 510 512 501 530 430

2005 523 532 525 555 450

II. Base 2001=100

Linking Factor

with previous

base: 1982=100 * 4.57 4.79 * 4.64 4.75 4.04 2006 125 120 116 119 119 123 116

2007 135 126 123 126 126 133 125

2008 150 139 135 137 135 149 133

2009 169 161 152 161 153 172 147

2010 193 181 165 180 173 199 160

2011 200 194 174 188 192 204 170

2012 216 208 190 207 213 222 182 2013 242 233 207 236 236 247 196

2013 May 235 227 206 234 231 245 189

June 240 235 210 240 236 251 190

July 249 236 210 239 237 250 193

Aug 250 241 211 239 240 252 198

Sept 243 243 211 239 247 252 200

Oct 247 244 212 242 247 253 204

Nov 249 248 215 245 252 254 209

Dec 248 243 213 239 246 253 204

2014 Jan 247 242 212 239 243 249 202

Feb 248 244 210 237 241 249 201

Mar 255 244 211 236 241 250 201

Apr 258 246 212 236 241 251 202

May 262 247 215 238 244 254 206

Page 85: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

895

Guwa

hati

Labac

Silchar

Mariani

Jorhat

Rangapara

Tezpur

Monghyr

Jamalpur

Chandigarh Bhilai

1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 * 1966= 100

* 3.96 3.95 4.29 5.29 3.49 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

235 217 229 230 234 236 214 252 233 244 246 242 252 229 280 251 264 266 267 271 250 312 274 296 295 288 294 272 341 295 324 323 316 315 302 357 312 339 340 331 345 323 405 345 389 390 379 401 361 436 375 416 412 415 447 373 460 370 418 408 416 460 390 471 372 411 419 416 488 407 480 374 411 417 435 514 413 496 383 432 427 459 526 439 516 411 441 433 479 560 459 531 415 449 439 511 615 480

4.80 3.65 4.01 4.17 4.30 5.26 4.20

115 121 116 114 126 125 121

120 130 127 126 134 131 132

128 143 133 131 145 140 145

143 155 147 144 162 155 162

156 178 158 154 182 175 180

168 186 171 163 199 197 206

184 197 185 171 215 213 241

198 216 195 186 238 232 265

193 208 192 180 232 226 261

195 211 192 182 234 226 269

197 212 193 188 239 233 272

202 216 196 188 242 236 274

204 225 197 190 244 239 272

207 233 202 195 249 240 275

210 239 207 199 257 241 276

208 234 206 197 247 238 269

210 233 205 197 242 239 267

209 236 205 199 242 241 268

204 236 207 205 246 242 268

206 239 209 210 242 245 270

210 242 214 211 247 244 274

Page 86: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

896

Table B.1.1.2 Contd.

Year/

month

Delhi Goa Ahmedabad

Bhavnagar Rajkot Surat Vadodra

Base Year 1960= 100 1966= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100

L. Factor 4.97 3.40 4.78 4.99 * * * 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

I- Base-1982=100 1992 247 257 241 244 237 252 240 1993 272 285 250 259 246 260 252 1994 299 310 279 294 276 292 278 1995 327 339 303 318 296 320 303 1996 346 373 333 350 332 356 332 1997 380 416 357 373 350 373 350 1998 447 451 399 425 393 417 385 1999 480 482 422 447 409 432 405 2000 514 520 441 466 430 446 430 2001 529 555 460 483 433 474 453 2002 550 577 476 492 447 484 467 2003 570 592 488 504 457 490 470 2004 598 614 507 523 465 490 485 2005 648 634 519 537 496 505 500

II. Base 2001=100

Linking Factor

with previous

base: 1982=100 5.60 5.59 4.62 4.76 4.38 4.54 4.39

2006 122 121 120 119 118 118 120

2007 128 130 129 129 126 127 127

2008 137 144 138 135 132 134 133

2009 147 164 151 147 146 146 147

2010 163 188 171 174 174 162 167

2011 176 203 186 189 193 174 180

2012 191 222 206 206 216 192 198

2013 209 248 233 221 231 218 219

2013 May 200 251 227 218 230 212 215

June 203 252 232 219 232 217 215

July 210 260 240 223 232 226 223

Aug 215 255 241 228 233 224 227

Sept 216 247 237 223 231 224 226

Oct 218 247 245 232 235 231 233

Nov 221 247 244 228 237 225 229

Dec 214 245 234 218 231 220 225

2014 Jan 215 247 231 214 230 214 222

Feb 213 249 230 213 230 214 222

Mar 215 252 228 214 231 214 222

Apr 219 255 230 216 232 216 223

May 219 260 232 223 236 219 225

Page 87: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

897

Faridabad Yamuna-nagar

Himachal

Pradesh

Srinagar Bokaro Giridih Jamshedpur

1960= 100 1965= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100

* 5.53 3.75 5.47 4.68

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

224 218 226 231 226

244 235 244 252 239 268 259 268 271 260

295 292 292 303 280 326 315 314 321 321

359 335 340 347 340 426 378 386 414 385

435 392 407 471 397

443 412 430 480 405 469 428 447 520 419

480 443 454 547 431 499 462 466 574 456

532 486 488 599 479

550 521 510 632 508

4.79 4.34 4.53 5.62 * * 4.23

122 127 120 118 121 134 126

130 133 126 125 130 146 132

145 145 135 134 142 156 142

160 162 147 155 158 177 157

182 183 161 159 168 204 182

194 197 172 172 192 232 213 207 215 188 190 210 250 232

218 230 208 203 229 282 251

219 227 205 195 219 272 246

221 228 208 199 226 273 251

215 228 213 206 232 289 255 217 230 214 205 232 292 255

218 231 215 208 232 293 260 221 233 217 208 238 299 264

225 236 218 212 249 308 265

220 234 213 213 245 296 256

217 234 214 214 239 292 256

217 235 215 214 239 292 256

221 236 217 214 247 296 257

224 239 219 214 249 302 259

221 243 219 216 249 297 264

Page 88: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

898

Table B.1.1.2 Contd.

Year/

month

Jharia Kodarma Ranchi Hatia Bangalore Belgaum Hubli Dharwar

Base Year 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100

L. Factor 4.63 5.43 * 5.66 * * 1 30 31 32 33 34 35

I- Base-1982=100 1992 218 215 233 230 243 246 1993 226 228 247 248 256 259 1994 244 248 269 272 285 280 1995 262 265 292 305 327 314 1996 286 290 320 331 353 337 1997 301 310 340 361 380 362 1998 353 359 402 391 423 409 1999 363 379 414 405 457 430 2000 363 368 418 425 473 434 2001 365 373 426 438 486 451 2002 374 388 433 452 514 471 2003 393 402 438 476 535 494 2004 414 426 470 501 563 520 2005 442 471 497 533 588 544

II. Base 2001=100 Linking. Factor

with previous base: 1982=100 3.72 3.89 4.20 4.51 5.02 4.71

2006 126 132 125 125 125 123

2007 136 140 133 136 133 132

2008 146 149 148 150 144 147

2009 161 169 170 167 162 164

2010 180 190 199 181 179 182

2011 198 215 220 194 200 200

2012 222 236 235 211 217 219

2013 262 263 267 238 242 248

2013 May 253 253 258 237 241 245

June 257 258 261 242 246 248

July 266 269 266 242 249 255

Aug 267 270 272 243 252 256

Sept 269 270 275 243 249 255

Oct 274 278 281 246 246 254

Nov 278 287 287 247 249 257

Dec 271 280 282 243 246 256

2014 Jan 274 273 278 244 246 256

Feb 273 270 279 242 245 256

Mar 274 274 280 244 245 257

Apr 278 280 281 247 247 260

May 278 279 283 248 250 264

Page 89: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

899

Mercara Mysore ErnakulamAluva

Mundakayam Quilon Bhopal

Chhindwara Indore

1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1966= 100 1960= 100

* 5.19 4.67 * 5.46 2.59 5.18 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

243 243 249 252 268 263 267 269 273 278 288 291 284 292 304 311 314 325 312 314 315 339 348 355 362 351 344 344 375 371 384 391 377 359 356 418 404 419 395 436 403 406 444 423 443 428 444 419 425 458 442 453 449 451 420 445 457 458 451 457 488 429 470 458 478 469 486 510 437 488

474 490 489 522 525 448 511 491 515 500 533 537 460 521 495 542 514 546 561 474 537

4.47 * 4.52 4.37 4.61 4.83 4.03 4.73

114 123 125 124 126 127 127 122

121 130 131 130 129 135 137 131

135 142 142 145 143 145 150 140

154 160 153 159 154 161 162 152

172 174 167 174 172 185 177 168

188 187 185 191 195 205 195 181

208 205 199 213 206 221 216 200

240 242 225 251 236 238 242 222

239 243 222 251 231 233 237 220

243 245 226 255 235 235 238 220

243 244 229 258 241 242 242 226

245 247 227 258 239 244 250 227

247 252 229 255 242 245 251 227

245 253 231 256 247 248 248 229

251 253 232 257 247 251 254 231

248 252 232 255 247 247 244 228

246 249 232 254 251 243 242 224

245 251 236 255 260 242 237 224

244 252 238 254 255 244 244 227

246 256 244 258 259 248 247 231

252 257 247 263 258 249 243 231

Page 90: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

900

Table B.1.1.2 Contd.

Year/

month

Jabalpur Mumbai Nagpur Nasik Pune Solapur Angul Talcher

Base Year 1949= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100

L. Factor 6.41 5.12 4.99 * * 5.03 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 I- Base-1982=100

1991 232 226 223 228 217 224 1992 254 255 253 255 253 260 1993 272 273 268 270 266 264 1994 301 306 292 296 296 289 1995 315 339 314 322 330 327 1996 339 363 342 353 359 357 1997 356 400 370 377 388 371 1998 409 453 427 423 448 431 1999 435 468 438 432 466 450 2000 446 505 461 465 493 467 2001 458 528 483 498 516 471 2002 468 558 495 514 528 486 2003 488 583 503 532 554 501 2004 508 604 524 554 574 529 2005 540 611 554 576 589 539

II. Base 2001=100 Linking. Factor with previous base: 1982=100

4.53 5.18 4.68 4.94 4.96 4.73 *

2006 128 126 130 124 127 123 120

2007 135 134 140 130 136 139 128

2008 148 144 151 139 146 149 143

2009 159 159 174 157 162 160 160

2010 184 174 203 181 181 179 181

2011 198 192 220 204 200 199 200

2012 212 212 240 223 217 216 221

2013 231 237 265 242 237 239 241

2013 May 228 231 264 242 232 234 235

June 230 238 266 243 240 235 237

July 235 241 272 246 239 241 243

Aug 236 244 278 248 244 244 246

Sept 237 244 274 247 242 245 245

Oct 239 248 276 247 243 245 248

Nov 241 249 274 248 246 252 257

Dec 235 244 264 244 246 256 249

2014 Jan 232 244 266 244 246 256 247

Feb 232 246 265 243 248 256 245

Mar 233 247 265 244 248 256 246

Apr 238 250 270 246 250 256 253

May 239 253 274 250 253 257 253

Page 91: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

901

Table B.1.1.2 contd.

Rourkela Pondicherry Amritsar Jalandhar Ludhiana Ajmer Bhilwara Jaipur

1966= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1966=100 1960= 100

3.59 * 5.19 * 5.01 3.20 5.17

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58

216 256 220 219 243 240 228 232 279 238 237 253 253 245 254 313 261 262 280 290 269 275 344 278 285 305 310 291 303 387 298 301 332 333 321 341 428 314 320 357 350 346 390 464 369 374 392 393 387 396 467 379 381 411 420 390 406 477 388 396 433 439 403 407 482 403 413 452 460 423 416 510 418 431 472 474 442 432 543 431 441 487 488 452 453 556 452 469 510 505 467 473 580 492 504 537 532 495

4.03 4.88 4.09 * 4.12 4.78 4.62 4.25

124 123 130 126 129 122 125 127

137 130 139 131 134 129 133 134

149 146 149 141 146 138 144 145

166 163 163 155 160 152 158 159

186 173 190 174 175 175 176 179

204 184 208 190 188 191 192 192

222 209 227 205 205 215 215 214

245 237 240 224 222 233 236 230

241 237 236 219 216 229 230 224

242 239 235 221 216 232 231 224

248 242 243 227 223 236 236 232

251 243 244 229 227 238 240 233

254 243 246 230 228 238 246 232

255 242 251 231 233 238 247 237

262 245 247 234 233 240 252 239

254 247 241 229 225 238 245 233

251 247 245 230 227 236 237 231

247 249 246 234 224 232 234 232

251 248 247 234 225 232 235 234

253 251 249 237 231 239 238 235

255 254 255 236 230 237 239 235

Page 92: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

902

Table B.1.1.2 Contd.

Year/

month

Chennai

Coimbatore Coonoor

Madurai Salem Tiruchira-pally

Base Year 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 * *

L. Factor 5.05 5.35 4.80 5.27 59 60 61 62 63 64

I- Base-1982=100 1992 238 228 245 240 223 240

1993 258 245 262 256 241 259 1994 287 272 291 281 287 295

1995 330 303 325 318 322 330

1996 356 330 348 346 348 364 1997 382 354 377 366 364 406

1998 425 383 404 401 394 435 1999 446 402 414 423 414 463

2000 475 432 433 440 432 481 2001 487 441 445 446 443 488

2002 513 472 473 459 464 533

2003 533 495 497 482 483 568 2004 549 500 501 496 482 544

2005 565 508 511 509 481 579

II. Base 2001=100 Linking. Factor with previous base 1982=100

4.95 4.49 4.58 4.51 4.45 5.01

2006 118 119 115 116 114 119

2007 124 127 122 121 122 126

2008 135 137 134 134 134 141

2009 149 151 148 147 151 156

2010 161 166 168 162 163 174

2011 171 176 182 174 172 184

2012 196 193 204 196 192 208

2013 218 217 224 218 216 232

2013 May 218 216 226 218 217 230

June 222 215 228 223 220 233

July 222 217 225 218 219 231

Aug 221 218 226 218 221 237

Sept 221 220 228 220 223 236

Oct 223 220 230 226 222 236

Nov 227 225 228 228 225 239

Dec 225 226 227 225 221 238

2014 Jan 223 222 226 226 221 235

Feb 223 222 232 224 220 241

Mar 221 219 232 227 221 239

Apr 223 222 235 229 226 245

May 227 231 236 231 229 251

Page 93: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

903

Tripura Agra Ghaziabad Kanpur Lucknow Varanasi Asansol

Darjeeling

1961= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100

4.37 * * 4.69 5.12 4.77 4.55

65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72

239 229 237 243 255 223 218 257 239 247 256 268 238 232 273 262 266 278 289 260 255 301 289 295 307 312 284 271 321 313 321 328 347 307 292 337 334 347 351 371 322 304 383 384 406 411 450 381 355 409 398 440 428 473 400 384 416 403 448 428 466 412 382 424 418 467 447 477 431 393 435 435 475 459 486 456 399 568 438 493 471 504 472 423 460 480 519 489 531 491 431 468 514 555 520 571 509 440

4.17 4.36 4.78 4.50 * 4.96 4.37 3.80

115 128 125 125 121 122 124 120

123 136 132 132 129 131 138 130

131 146 142 141 144 142 151 142

144 168 159 158 163 160 171 153

156 193 182 183 185 183 195 170

167 208 198 200 195 194 211 184

177 220 209 214 203 208 231 196

194 240 232 237 224 231 256 215

190 235 223 230 219 221 248 211

190 238 226 237 222 224 255 212

192 244 235 245 227 232 259 214

197 243 240 246 229 235 265 216

203 247 241 246 233 242 265 222

209 249 244 247 233 245 269 227

210 252 246 249 235 249 271 229

202 247 243 245 229 239 264 227

200 246 239 242 229 234 266 224

197 246 237 246 234 235 266 225

201 248 236 251 238 238 267 224

205 251 241 253 240 240 274 225

207 253 238 252 239 243 274 230

Page 94: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

904

Table B.1.1.2 Concld.

Year/

month

Durgapur

Haldia Howrah Jalpaiguri Kolkata Raniganj Siliguri Base Year 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960= 100 1960=

100

L. Factor * * 4.12 4.16 4.74 4.40 73 74 75 76 77 78 79

I- Base-1982=100 1992 242 248 253 221 238 218 1993 262 268 271 232 257 229 1994 286 288 293 252 280 249 1995 312 328 323 280 312 274 1996 346 359 346 299 340 298 1997 368 385 364 312 359 314 1998 430 433 439 379 416 357 1999 443 464 482 399 437 373 2000 472 481 499 400 451 380 2001 509 533 519 407 492 399 2002 553 582 542 417 530 416 2003 564 590 556 421 541 426 2004 581 608 587 440 565 450 2005 592 624 620 452 587 471

II. Base 2001=100

Linking. Factor with previous

base 1982=100 5.13 5.64 5.42 3.96 5.12 4.02 *

2006 121 116 121 117 121 124 124

2007 130 124 130 125 132 132 135

2008 140 131 139 136 142 140 144

2009 155 144 154 150 156 156 156

2010 178 161 171 167 172 169 173

2011 193 185 183 179 185 180 187

2012 215 211 199 192 199 195 197

2013 263 230 215 221 222 214 218

2013 May 256 228 213 212 218 211 208

June 257 230 214 219 220 212 215

July 267 231 214 223 222 216 217

Aug 268 233 218 230 228 217 224

Sept 273 236 219 230 230 220 225

Oct 277 236 224 236 236 224 231

Nov 281 239 225 238 238 231 237

Dec 274 236 221 232 233 224 230

2014 Jan 276 233 219 230 231 221 227

Feb 273 232 217 233 229 218 227

Mar 278 234 220 234 232 219 227

Apr 280 238 224 236 236 223 229

May 280 241 229 238 238 227 230

* No Linking Factor as these centres were not covered in any of the earlier series Linking Factor - Figures on previous base : 1982=100 and 1960=100 (General Index) can be obtained by multiplying the index numbers of new base: 2001=100 by the respective linking factors given against each centre and rounding off the result to the nearest whole number.

Page 95: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

905

1.2 Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers

Table B.1.2.1 (a)-Year-wise All India Average Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural

Labourers ( General & Food on Base:1986-87=100 ) Year/ Month

Annual Average Indices for Agricultural Year

Twelve Monthly moving average of General Index

Financial Year Calendar Year

General Index

Food Index

General Index

Food Index

Year General Index

Food Index

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995-96 240@ 242@ - 237 ^ 239 ^ 1995 239$ 242$ 1996-97 260 264 - 256 260 1996 249 253 1997-98 269 269 - 264 264 1997 262 262 1998-99 299 305 - 293 299 1998 287 293 1999-2000 309 314 - 306 312 1999 304 310 2000-2001 304 299 - 305 303 2000 307 307 2001-2002 311 304 - 309 302 2001 307 300 2002-2003 2003-2004

323 332

316 326

- -

318 331

312 325

2002 2003

315 328

308 322

2004-2005 342 335 - 340 333 2004 337 331 2005-2006 358 351 - 353 345 2005 348 341 2006-2007 388 384 - 380 376 2006 372 366 2007-2008 2008-2009

417 462

416 464

- -

409 450

406 452

2007 2008

402 439

400 440

2009-2010 530 540 - 513 522 2009 494 500 2010-2011 577 582 564 572 2010 553 562 2011-2012 622 610 611 602 2011 602 598 2012-2013 692 679 672 658 2012 652 638 2013-2014 750 737 2013 735 724 2012-2013 May 719 704 685

June

2013-2014

729

718 692

July 740 732 699

August 754 747 706

September 759 751 714

October 766 759 721

November 777 771 728

December 765 752 735

January 757 737 740

February 757 733 745

March 763 741 750

April 771 751 755

May 777 757 760

Note: -(i) Agricultural Year ( July to June ). (ii) Financial Year ( April to March ). (iii) New series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers on Base: 1986-

87=100 released w.e.f. November, 1995. To obtain indices on Base : 1960-61=100, the index figures need to be multiplied by the linking factor as below :-

General Index – 5.89 Food Index – 6.38 @ = Average based on 8 months i.e. Nov., 95 to June, 96 only. ^ = Average based on 5 months i.e. Nov., 95 to March, 96 only $ = Average based on 2 months i.e. Nov., 95 and Dec., 95 only.

Page 96: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

906

Table B.1.2.1 ( b)-Year-wise All India Average Consumer Price Index Numbers or Rural Labourers ( General & Food on Base:1986-87=100 )

Year/

Month

Annual Average Indices for

Agricultural

Year

Twelve

Monthly

moving average

of General

Index

Financial Year Calendar Year

General

Index

Food

Index

General

Index

Food

Index

Year General

Index

Food

Index

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1995-96 240@ 242@ - 238^ 240^ 1995 239$ 242$

1996-97 260 264 - 256 260 1996 250 253

1997-98 270 270 - 266 265 1997 263 263

1998-99 299 305 - 294 300 1998 288 293

1999-2000 310 313 - 307 311 1999 305 310

2000-2001 306 300 - 307 303 2000 308 307

2001-2002 313 305 - 311 303 2001 309 302

2002-2003 325 317 - 321 312 2002 318 309

2003-2004 335 327 - 333 326 2003 331 323

2004-2005 344 335 - 342 333 2004 340 332

2005-2006 360 352 - 355 346 2005 351 341

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

389

418

462

529

577

623

693

384

416

463

541

582

611

681

-

-

-

-

382

409

451

513

564

611

673

751

376

406

452

523

573

603

660

738

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

373

403

440

494

552

602

654

735

366

399

440

500

563

599

640

725 2012-2013 May 720 706 686

June

2013-2014

730 720 693

July 741 734 700

August 753 748 707

September 759 752 714

October 766 759 721

November 777 772 729

December 766 753 735

January 759 739 741

February 759 735 746

March 765 743 751

April 773 753 756

May 780 760 761

Note: -(i) Agricultural Year ( July to June ). (ii) Financial Year (April to March).

(iii) New series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for Rural Labourers on Base: 1986-

87=100 was introduced for the first time w.e.f. November, 1995.

@ = Average based on 8 months i.e. Nov., 95 to June, 96 only.

^ = Average based on 5 months i.e. Nov., 95 to March, 96 only

$ = Average based on 2 months i.e. Nov., 95 and Dec., 95 only.

Page 97: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

907

Table B.1.2.2.(a)-State-wsie Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Agricultural Labourers ( General Index on Base: 1986-87=100 )

Agricultural

Year/Month

Andhra

Pradesh

Assam Bihar Gujarat Haryana Himachal

Pradesh

Jammu &

Kashmir

Karnataka

Linking factor 4.84 b 6.22 5.34 * * 5.98 5.81

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1995-96 @ 243 244 223 241 235 220 226 251

1996-97 268 259 250 254 265 240 252 266

1997-98 282 281 252 270 278 256 269 276

1998-99 309 311 285 297 306 283 303 306

1999-2000 318 323 300 310 312 294 323 316

2000-2001 317 322 282 314 313 292 326 302

2001-2002 328 320 290 320 322 298 331 309

2002-2003 342 330 299 332 329 308 344 325

2003-2004

2004-2005

347

357

343

347

311

324

339

350

341

359

321

325

345

348

341

340

2005-2006 371 362 347 369 376 343 359 341

2006-2007 401 388 384 403 403 367 392 367

2007-2008 430 417 411 424 447 376 413 406

2008-2009 484 451 446 459 498 406 453 458

2009-2010 552 520 500 538 588 455 524 535

2010-2011 603 580 532 583 642 484 568 595

2011-2012 668 622 552 627 690 513 608 665

2012-2013 733 682 617 694 765 555 671 750

2012-2013

May 771 692 629 726 788 560 694 792

June

2013-2014

789 691 636 735 792 566 695 808

July 793 702 649 749 802 583 701 822

August 812 710 661 769 817 591 708 838

September 819 723 671 778 836 608 721 832

October 821 727 686 794 846 616 737 831

November 833 747 707 799 860 631 739 835

December 823 750 699 775 841 622 726 817

January 818 744 685 771 837 618 724 807

February 809 741 687 767 843 623 727 810

March 815 746 700 772 847 629 734 816

April 822 758 707 777 852 637 742 824

May 829 762 715 784 846 636 748 835

Page 98: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

908

Table B.1.2.2.(a)-Concld.

Agricultural

Year/Month

Kerala Madhya

Pradesh

Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Orissa

Linking factor 6.56 6.04 5.85 * * 6.05

1 10 11 12 13 14 15

1995-96 @ 259 237 248 244 252 236

1996-97 281 261 256 252 264 254

1997-98 292 273 266 268 282 262

1998-99 305 300 291 292 321 289

1999-2000 312 313 304 312 338 316

2000-2001 321 310 303 316 346 304

2001-2002 321 310 306 304 351 300

2002-2003 330 318 321 300 343 298

2003-2004

2004-2005

342

351

318

330

335

350

308

310

350

360

314

320

2005-2006 356 352 368 328 382 334

2006-2007 374 388 402 337 410 365

2007-2008 403 412 432 367 439 400

2008-2009 454 459 475 407 484 438

2009-2010 496 525 562 455 540 495

2010-2011 562 569 619 527 576 538

2011-2012 601 615 691 594 633 562

2012-2013 665 679 760 639 706 631

2012-2013

May 708 699 773 658 725 657

June

2013-2014

721 702 785 667 721 667

July 732 713 793 677 725 685

August 745 730 808 687 740 699

September 754 733 809 697 752 701

October 767 738 805 711 755 717

November 771 744 806 721 757 736

December 777 725 797 724 749 720

January 774 711 787 722 749 712

February 776 709 787 720 752 711

March 780 710 797 725 757 707

April 785 716 810 730 765 716

May 796 720 820 741 778 727

Note:- Agricultural Year ( July to June )

@ = Average based on 8 months i.e. from November, 1995 to June, 1996 only.

Page 99: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

909

Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Tripura Uttar Pradesh West Bengal

c 6.15 5.67 * 6.60 5.73

16 17 18 19 20 21

244 238 246 220 232 230

263 261 261 240 264 247

278 268 264 263 268 259

306 290 291 312 298 308

314 310 302 331 307 303

316 311 299 324 301 292

326 309 311 322 312 303

331 325 344 325 323 305

343

355

323

346

349

347

326

337

331

343

321

333

380 377 355 351 371 342

417 413 371 383 408 365

448 439 403 407 433 395

501 490 455 433 469 432

586 573 514 466 535 504

624 608 565 514 566 561

685 668 605 548 595 592

756 749 686 587 672 655

775 776 733 597 684 682

785

780 765 601 699 690

793 788 751 619 714 703

814 807 758 629 719 715

826 814 764 647 721 722

832 819 768 664 729 732

841 823 772 675 746 750

814 815 767 677 735 731

811 819 759 667 725 725

813 828 762 666 729 720

821 834 765 683 740 728

829 838 774 690 745 742

832 839 782 695 749 740

* = Indices for the State compiled and published for the first time w.e.f. November, 1995.

b & c = To obtain linking factors for Assam and Punjab on Base 1986-87=100, please consult

article published in February, 1996 issue of the Indian Labour Journal.

Page 100: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

910

Table B.1.2.2 (b).-State-wise Labour Bureau‟s Series of Consumer Price Index Numbers for

Rural Labourers ( General Index Base: 1986-87=100 )

Agricultural

Year/Month

Andhra

Pradesh_

Assam Bihar Gujarat Haryana Himachal

Pradesh

Jammu &

Kashmir

Karnataka

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1995-96 @ 244 243 223 241 237 221 225 250

1996-97 269 258 250 254 266 240 250 266

1997-98 282 278 254 270 279 258 266 276

1998-99 309 310 287 298 306 284 297 306

1999-2000 318 321 302 311 312 295 316 316

2000-2001 318 321 284 315 314 294 319 304

2001-2002 328 320 292 322 323 304 324 311

2002-2003 343 330 301 333 330 314 337 326

2003-2004

2004-2005

348

357

344

348

313

326

341

351

342

361

326

331

340

344

341

340

2005-2006 371 364 348 371 378 350 359 341

2006-2007 401 390 384 403 404 377 393 367

2007-2008 429 419 412 425 445 388 413 407

2008-2009 482 454 447 460 495 420 451 459

2009-2010 550 524 500 538 583 474 521 534

2010-2011 599 583 532 583 638 503 564 594

2011-2012 665 625 555 626 685 535 602 665

2012-2013 732 686 620 692 759 582 668 747

2012-2013

May 769 696 633 723 781 592 692 789

June

2013-2014

787 696 641 733 785 601 693 804

July 791 708 654 745 796 619 700 818

August 809 716 666 765 811 625 705 831

September 815 728 675 775 830 640 721 824

October 817 732 690 791 840 651 735 824

November 830 754 710 795 854 666 739 827

December 820 756 703 774 834 652 722 810

January 815 750 689 770 830 650 720 800

February 807 747 691 767 836 656 721 804

March 813 753 704 772 840 663 729 811

April 820 765 710 776 845 673 736 818

May 826 767 719 783 839 673 743 830

Page 101: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

911

Kerala Madhya

Pradesh

Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Orissa

10 11 12 13 14 15

260 239 247 245 250 236

284 262 256 253 263 254

294 274 266 268 281 262

306 300 291 293 319 289

314 314 303 312 336 315

324 313 303 317 343 304

324 314 307 304 348 300

332 323 321 301 340 299

343

352

324

336

336

350

309

311

349

358

314

320

359 358 368 328 379 335

378 392 400 338 408 366

404 415 428 368 436 400

456 463 470 407 481 439

502 532 557 456 535 496

566 576 613 529 572 538

604 622 683 596 629 563

668 688 754 641 701 631

707 709 768 660 720 658

720 712 780 669 716 668

730 722 789 679 719 685

742 739 802 690 734 699

751 745 802 700 745 702

764 750 800 714 748 718

769 758 800 724 750 736

774 741 792 727 743 720

773 731 782 725 745 712

774 729 784 723 748 711

779 730 793 728 753 707

784 735 806 733 762 716

796 740 817 744 774 727

Page 102: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

912

Table B.1.2.2 (b) - Concld.

Agricultural

Year/Month

Punjab Rajasthan Tamil

Nadu

Tripura Uttar

Pradesh

West

Bengal

1 16 17 18 19 20 21

1995-96 @ 247 239 244 219 231 232

1996-97 265 262 260 237 262 248

1997-98 281 270 265 261 267 260

1998-99 309 292 290 308 297 309

1999-2000 317 310 301 328 307 304

2000-2001 320 312 299 318 303 293

2001-2002 330 311 311 316 316 305

2002-2003 336 326 343 318 326 308

2003-2004

2004-2005

347

359

323

345

348

348

318

329

335

346

324

336

2005-2006 384 375 355 344 372 346

2006-2007 419 412 370 373 409 368

2007-2008 449 438 402 399 434 398

2008-2009 501 486 452 429 469 435

2009-2010 585 567 509 462 532 506

2010-2011 622 600 559 512 563 564

2011-2012 681 661 603 547 597 597

2012-2013 749 740 683 586 672 662

2012-2013

May 768 764 727 592 684 689

June

2013-2014

778

768 737 597 698 697

July 785 776 744 616 712 710

August 804 793 749 624 718 722

September 815 800 755 643 720 731

October 820 805 759 658 728 741

November 829 809 764 671 744 759

December 805 804 761 674 733 740

January 804 808 755 662 724 734

February 807 815 758 660 728 730

March 814 820 760 675 739 738

April 822 825 769 680 744 753

May 825 825 777 685 748 751 Note: – Agricultural Year ( July to June )

@ = Average based on 8 months i.e. from November, 1995 to June, 1996 only.

Page 103: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

913

1.3. Urban Non-Manual Employees’ Consumer Price Index

Table B.1.3. All India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Urban Non-Manual Employees

(Base: 1984-85=100)

Year/Month General Index

1 2

1990 156

1991 177

1992 199

1993 212

1994 231

1995 254

1996 276

1997 297

1998 330

1999 348

2000 366

2001 386

2002 402

2003 416

2004 432

2005 451

2006 478

2007 509

2008 548

2009 612

2010 687

Consumer Price Index for Rural and Urban Areas on base: 2010=100*

Year/Month Rural Urban

General Index General Index

2013 May 129.8 128.4

June 132.1 130.5

July 133.8 132.1

August 135.4 133.6

September 137.8 134.0

October 139.5 135.1

November 141.7 136.4

December 140.1 135.3

2014 January 139.2 135.0

February 138.9 135.3

March 139.7 136.0

April 140.5 137.2

May 141.3 138.1

* New series of CPI has been introduced w.e.f. Jan., 2011 in place of UNME.

Source: Central Statistical Organisation, New Delhi.

Page 104: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

914

1.4. Wholesale Price Index

Table B.1.4 – Index Numbers of Wholesale Prices in India

Year/

Month

All

Commodities

I. Primary Articles II. Fuel Power

Light and

Lubricants All Food

Articles

Non-Food

Articles

Minerals

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

I Base 1981-1982=100

1991 201.4 210.0 230.3 221.8 112.1 193.3 1992 224.7 233.2 266.8 231.6 115.5 219.3 1993 242.1 245.3 281.8 238.5 128.5 254.3 1994 267.4 273.7 303.6 285.5 141.6 278.3 1995 292.4 301.4 331.1 322.1 151.5 284.1 1996 309.0 320.7 362.7 327.0 156.4 311.2 1997 325.6 335.5 384.3 335.1 160.9 355.8 1998 348.2 371.9 431.8 368.2 163.7 380.7 1999 360.3 388.1 454.3 378.9 168.8 403.0

II Base 1993-94=100

2000 152.8 161.5 170.0 144.6 110.2 196.0 2001 160.7 167.0 174.3 152.6 118.4 224.8 2002 164.7 171.7 178.6 158.6 119.4 234.9 2003 173.4 180.0 181.0 182.4 118.3 250.6 2004 184.9 187.5 185.1 190.7 223.8 273.5 2005 193.7 191.3 192.4 180.2 298.6 300.8 2006 203.0 203.4 205.6 182.6 397.4 322.2 2007 212.8 220.8 220.0 206.1 430.1 322.9 2008 232.2 243.0 234.6 234.4 616.4 354.5 2009 237.0 264.0 264.0 237.2 605.9 334.3

III Base: 2004-05 = 100

2010 140.1 175.9 174.6 155.9 244.0 144.2

2011 153.4 197.1 190.4 183.1 299.2 163.3

2012 164.9 215 206.5 196.8 345 182.5

2013May 171.6 229.3 223.1 208.5 346.5 192 June 172.7 232.5 229.8 208.5 324.9 194 July 175.4 238.8 237.7 210.7 328.5 199.8 Aug 177.5 247.8 250.3 209.6 330.9 202.3

Sept. 179.7 251.6 252.3 213.7 352.1 207.5 Oct 180.3 251.6 251.4 212.3 363.7 209.6 Nov 181.5 256.3 256.4 216.7 365.7 209.6 Dec 179.2 243.6 240.1 215.8 354.2 211.3

2014 Jan 178.9 239.9 233.6 216 352.9 212.8 Feb 178.9 238.6 232.5 217.4 352.1 212.6 Mar 179.8 240.2 235.3 217.2 350.9 213.1

Apr 180.8 242.4 239 216.9 345.6 211.8

May 181.7 246.8 244.3 218.8 348.5 212.1

Page 105: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

915

III Manufactured Products

All Food

Products

Beverages

Tobacco &

Tobacco

Products

Textiles Wood &

Wood

Products

Paper &

Paper

Products

Leather &

leather

Products

Rubber

& Plastic

Products

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

198.1 201.1 258.1 183.4 159.5 251.1 234.9 167.9

220.8 221.1 288.7 198.4 273.8 301.0 227.4 183.3

238.0 240.1 302.4 212.7 366.3 324.5 240.1 189.2

261.7 264.4 332.4 246.9 414.6 330.8 256.7 195.3

288.8 278.4 367.9 287.9 438.3 362.3 274.7 228.3

301.9 289.5 387.3 303.0 445.5 377.4 280.6 242.5

314.2 316.4 430.7 307.8 474.8 371.6 287.1 245.5

328.7 340.0 471.5 318.6 598.2 382.7 296.8 247.4

336.6 344.8 501.4 321.2 622.3 395.1 312.2 245.5

140.2 147.2 177.1 118.6 185.1 159.5 151.8 125.3 144.2 144.9 190.7 120.5 172.5 174.1 144.0 125.8 146.6 150.8 202.7 120.0 178.8 172.9 131.0 130.6

154.0 163.0 205.0 128.3 179.2 173.8 142.3 134.4 164.3 173.5 212.8 137.5 179.5 173.7 152.4 135.1 170.6 176.2 223.8 129.7 187.5 177.1 166.0 137.4 176.3 180.7 238.6 131.6 204.7 188.0 162.0 145.4 185.5 186.9 262.9 132.2 215.5 193.6 166.2 156.0 201.2 205.2 287.5 135.8 229.3 200.3 167.2 165.4 205.9 233.6 305.5 143.3 236.8 204.3 166.7 168.6

128.1 140.9 143.1 115.3 147.5 123.1 127.6 123.2

137.5 149.1 159.4 128.8 157.7 130.8 128.3 132.9

145.4 160.3 172.4 130 168.6 134.8 133.4 136.3

149.1 167.1 181.9 135.0 174.3 140.7 136.1 139.7

149.3 167.7 181.4 135.3 175.3 140.5 138.1 142.4

150.2 168.9 181.8 136.4 175.8 140.5 142.5 144.4

150 167.7 181.6 137.3 177.2 140.3 142.3 144.4

151 170 181.2 138.3 178.4 140.8 145.1 145.8

151.6 169.8 182.9 139.7 178.4 142.3 143.8 146.6

151.9 170.8 182.9 140.4 178.9 142.9 127.8 146.7

151.9 169.7 185.9 140.2 175.8 144.3 144 147.8

152.6 169.1 188.1 140.9 179 144.7 144.3 148.3

152.7 168.2 187.6 140.4 182.1 146.2 145.3 148.4

153.5 168.7 195.1 141.3 183.1 146.3 146 149.2

154.6 171.6 197.4 143.1 189 149.4 144.9 150.1

154.6 170.9 197.6 142.7 188.3 149.7 144.7 150.1

Page 106: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

916

Table B.1.4 Concld.

Year/ Month III Manufactured Products

Chemicals &

Chemical

Products

Non-metallic

Mineral

Products

Basic Metals

Alloys & Metal

Products

Machinery &

Machine tools

Transport

Equipment and

parts

1 16 17 18 19 20

I Base 1981-82=100

1991 162.4 208.7 231.8 200.4 197.1

1992 186.7 229.4 250.9 226.8 215.5

1993 204.8 248.3 270.8 235.8 222.1

1994 225.1 270.9 293.1 254.6 234.4

1995 246.7 305.4 324.4 280.2 250.5

1996 257.3 331.0 337.4 292.0 263.4

1997 267.3 341.3 346.6 299.4 272.7

1998 277.1 351.0 352.4 303.0 283.1

1999 289.9 369.0 357.6 307.6 295.4

II Base 1993-94=100

2000 161.9 128.4 139.1 120.2 141.1

2001 168.4 145.6 140.9 128.5 146.5

2002 172.0 142.6 143.2 130.0 147.9

2003 176.9 146.7 160.1 132.0 147.0

2004 180.1 154.9 195.5 137.7 152.1

2005 186.9 167.1 218.8 146.1 159.0

2006 192.5 186.4 225.0 152.7 161.8

2007 201.3 204.8 244.6 164.9 164.9

2008 218.2 215.5 285.5 173.4 174.4

2009 224.9 221.9 257.4 172.7 175.6

III Base: 2004-05 = 100 2010 122.1 143.6 137.3 120.3 119.4 2011 132.1 150.3 152.3 124.2 123.6 2012 141.8 161 165.3 127.6 128.3

2013 May 146.1 164.8 163.8 130.1 132.1

June 146.0 166.6 163.0 130.4 132.7

July 147.6 166.4 162.3 131.5 133.2

Aug 147.6 164.3 162.7 130.8 133.7 Sept. 148.7 164.7 163.1 131.1 134.1

Oct 148.9 164.7 164.1 131.6 135.7 Nov 148.7 164.7 164.0 132.2 135.5 Dec 149.2 165.6 163.6 132.1 135.6

2014 Jan 150.0 165.6 165.9 132.5 135.8 Feb 150.8 166.5 166.6 132.4 135.5 Mar 151.1 167.6 167.6 132.7 135.8 Apr 153.2 166.7 166.5 133.4 135.7

May 152.9 168.1 166.9 133.3 135.8

Note : Linking factor for deriving the General Indices on base: 1981-82=100 to Base 1993-94 is

2.478 and from base 1993-94=100 to base 2004-05 is for All commodities = 1.873, Primary

article =1.881, Fuel & Power = 2.802, Manufactured products = 1.663

Source: Office of the Economic Adviser, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi.

Page 107: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

917

2. WAGES AND EARNINGS

Table B.2.1 – Earnings (Basic Wage, Dearness Allowances) of the Lowest Paid Workers/

Operatives in Cotton Textile Mills for the month of May, 2014.

Year/ Month

Ahmedabad Bangalore Vadodara Mumbai Coimbatore & Chennai

1 2 3 4 5 6

1985 793.15 876.48 766.00 874.54 934.21

1990 1147.88 1379.74 1118.89 1313.78 1507.45

1995 1825.00 2397.19 1792.94 2237.85 2740.68

1996 1996.05 2591.10 1963.43 2389.95 2953.13

1997 2155.88 2840.36 2122.65 2622.11 3178.79

1998 2348.78 3073.17 2314.56 2958.08 3523.80

1999 2543.10 3199.73 2507.78 3084.01 3732.75

2000 2646.28 3353.44 2610.72 3294.36 3954.97

2001 2751.31 3451.66 2715.14 3455.99 4062.23

2002 2849.90 3567.03 2799.20 3642.14 4287.30

2003 2930.80 3749.72 2891.41 3811.69 4438.76

2004 3019.05 3944.89 2981.75 3941.44 4583.10

2005 3100.05 4191.63 3062.36 3996.49 4726.11

2006 3273.76 4447.32 3235.24 4227.16 4859.40

2007 3539.73 4821.78 3490.90 4472.78 5137.83

2008 3767.74 5275.10 3726.69 4799.79 5559.81

2009 4076.37 5903.63 4034.08 5267.03 6164.64

2010 4623.52 6431.40 4579.07 5782.10 6648.95

2011 5054.33 6880.72 5007.73 6369.27 7065.77

2012 5554.74 7469.64 5505.81 7023.55 8065.37

2013 6255.70 8421.27 6203.55 7863.58 9002.26

2013 May 6082.70 8420.93 6030.80 7650.11 8728.30

June 6190.48 8457.51 6138.49 7716.64 9061.15

July 6217.42 8634.83 6165.41 7949.52 9227.75

Aug. 6352.14 8634.83 6300.03 8049.33 9227.75

Sept. 6568.92 8671.41 6515.41 8149.13 9186.10

Oct. 6595.87 8671.41 6542.33 8149.13 9186.10

Nov. 6488.09 8778.98 6434.64 8282.20 9269.40

Dec. 6703.64 8814.01 6650.02 8315.47 9436.00

2014 Jan 6676.70 8671.41 6623.10 8149.13 9352.70

Feb. 6407.26 8706.13 6353.87 8149.13 9269.40

Mar. 6325.20 8634.83 6273.10 8215.67 9269.40

Apr. 6298.26 8706.13 6246.18 8248.94 9186.10

May 6244.37 8814.01 6192.33 8348.74 9269.40

N.B.- Yearly figures indicate average of twelve calendar months and the monthly figures relate

to a standard month of 26 days.

Page 108: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

918

Table B.2.1 concld.

Year/ Month

Delhi Indore Kanpur Nagpur Solapur Kolkata

1 7 8 9 10 11 12

1985 734.12 755.14 824.70 658.96 723.32 814.33

1990 1070.33 1143.01 1232.60 956.25 1045.37 1195.16

1995 1739.63 1810.43 1949.70 1520.00 1744.67 1887.30

1996 1831.84 1970.78 2078.29 1638.04 1889.84 2099.53

1997 2013.39 2061.69 2243.55 1794.01 1981.08 2229.42

1998 2307.43 2256.09 2553.60 1988.73 2249.74 2452.04

1999 2524.99 2466.82 2743.61 2140.61 2399.14 2728.51

2000 2693.26 2540.94 2750.02 2195.02 2474.53 2796.11

2001 2775.73 2675.21 2839.01 2322.34 2489.57 2964.03

2002 2881.49 2792.85 2931.94 2383.55 2572.85 3292.82

2003 2981.47 2912.04 2995.84 2422.82 2636.12 3347.73

2004 3113.99 2986.63 3112.39 2496.74 2789.17 3478.77

2005 3350.68 3057.48 3279.56 2637.64 2841.65 3599.75

2006 3544.08 3255.16 3592.54 2338.85 2239.55 3797.02

2007 * 3474.05 3833.84 3097.41 * 4097.84

2008 * 3676.41 4062.10 3318.05 * 4420.66

2009 * 3939.07 4487.57 3726.56 * 4775.49

2010 * 4418.29 5238.85 4391.43 * 5362.25

2011 * 4748.82 5731.94 4800.80 * 5755.50

2012 * 5189.95 6104.54 5212.98 * 6134.40

2013 * 5769.71 6741.06 5751.93 * 6783.80

2013 May * 5644.02 6546.66 5608.99 * 6643.58

June * 5644.02 6603.36 5652.09 * 6643.58

July * 5846.89 6660.06 5725.15 * 6643.58

Aug. * 5846.89 6859.86 5813.21 * 6906.46

Sept. * 5846.89 7088.01 5929.37 * 6906.49

Oct. * 6040.94 7116.36 6031.48 * 6906.49

Nov. * 6040.94 7116.36 6089.56 * 7200.96

Dec. * 6040.94 7144.71 6118.60 * 7200.96

2014 Jan * 6040.94 7201.41 6118.60 * 7200.96

Feb. * 6111.51 7088.01 6017.43 * 7484.90

Mar. * 6111.51 7001.60 5944.36 * 7484.90

Apr. * 5996.84 7116.36 5878.78 * 7484.90

May * 5996.84 7258.11 5885.34 * 7327.15

New series on Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers on base 2001=100 has been

introduced w.e.f. the index of January 2006.

Centre linking factor on base 2001=100 is: Ahmedabad (4.62), Bangalore (4.51), Vadodara (4.39), Mumbai

(5.18), Coimbatore / Chennai (4.95), Delhi(5.60), Indore(4.73),Kanpur(4.50), Nagpur (4.68), Sholapur

(4.73) and Kolkata (5.12)

* Earning of Delhi and Sholapur Centres have been discontinued due to closure of Textile Mills.

Source: Monthly returns received from the selected centres.

Page 109: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

919

3. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES

Table B.3.1- Industrial Disputes (All Strikes and Lockouts) during the period 2006 to 2014

Year Number of

Disputes Workers Involved Mandays Lost („000 )

1 2 3 4

2006

430 1810348 20324

2007

389 724574 27167

2008

421 1579298 17433

2009 345 1867204 17622

2010 371 1074473 23131

2011 370 734763 14458

2012(P)

447 1307505 12876

2013(P)

194 1054764 3615

2014(P)

(Jan. to May)

79 351168 1217

(P) = Provisional and based on the returns /clarifications received in the Bureau till

2nd

September, 2014

If you truly loved yourself, you could never hurt another

-Gautama Buddha

Page 110: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

920

IT IS THE PRIME RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERY CITIZEN

TO FEEL THAT HIS COUNTRY IS FREE AND TO DEFEND ITS

FREEDOM IS HIS DUTY.

-SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL

Page 111: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

921

Priced publications of the Labour Bureau

1. ANNUAL SURVEY OF INDUSTRIES 2010-11 (VOL. I)

Statistics on Employment and Labour Cost

The publication presents statistics on Employment and Labour Cost for the year 2010-

11 and is based on Block-E of Part-I of the ASI Schedule.

Symbol: PCSO 33-2010-11 (Vol.I) 120-2012 (DSK-III)

Price : Rs. 245.00

2 ANNUAL SURVEY OF INDUSTRIES 2010-11 (VOL. II) Report on Absenteeism, Labour Turnover, Employment and Labour Cost

The report presents statistics on Absenteeism, Labour Turnover, Employment, Labour

Cost and Earnings for the year 2010-11 and is based on Block-E of Part-I and Block-2 of Part-II of the ASI Schedule.

Symbol: PCSO 33-2010-11 (Vol.II) 120-2012 (DSK-III)

Price : Rs. 139.00

3. OCCUPATIONAL WAGE SURVEY SIXTH ROUND 2009

(Report on Nine Engineering Industries)

The Sixth round of Occupational Wage Survey report on Nine Engineering Industries presents statistics on Employment Structure, Wage Rates, Dearness Allowance and Average Daily Earnings by Occupationa and Stratum. The report also makes an attempt to meet the statutory obligation pertaining to Article 8 or part-II (Average Earnings and Wage Stracture & Distributioon) of the ILO Covention No. 160 on labour Statistics. The data presented in this Report would prove useful to the users and the plicy maker.

Symbol: PDLB 640 176-2010 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 176.00

4. REPORT ON THE SURVEY ON SOCIO ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF LICENSED RAILWAY PORTERS AT FIVE SELECTED CENTRES, 2004

The report contains data on demographic particulars, earnings, expenditure, assets, consumption habits, indebtedness, health, availability of welfare facilities and industrial relations etc. in respect of Licensed Railway Porters working at the five selected centres. The data would be of immense use to the authorities entrusted with the task of ameliorating the lot of these workers.

Symbol: PDLB – 508 (E) 250-2004(DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 65.00

All the priced publications brought out by the Labour Bureau can be obtained from the Controller of

Publications, Civil Lines, Delhi-110054 by remitting the price in advance. Kindly quote the Symbol

number of the publication to facilitate its delivery.

Page 112: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

922

5. RURAL LABOUR ENQUIRY REPORT ON WAGES & EARNINGS OF RURAL LABOUR HOUSEHOLDS – 2004-2005

The report contains data on Wages & Earnings of Rural labour Households collected by

the national Sample Survey Organisation during its 61st round (2004-2005) of survey. It gives

information on Wages & Earnings of Rural as well as Agricultural labour Households by States and Categories of Households, in the country, for various agricultural occupations. The data is of immense use to the planners, researchers and policy framers.

Symbol: PDLB - 638 250-2010 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 105.00

6. RURAL LABOUR ENQUIRY REPORT ON GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RURAL LABOUR HOUSEHOLDS – 2004-2005

The report contains data on general characteristics of rural labour households, viz.,

demographic structure of labour households; size of households; land holding pattern of households; and number of agricultural and non-agricultural households, etc. – a mine of information on the said subject, which would be of immense value to the researchers, economic planners and policy framers.

Symbol: PDLB – 652 200-2011 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 90.00

7. RURAL LABOUR ENQUIRY REPORT ON INDEBTEDNESS AMONG RURAL

LABOUR HOUSEHOLDS – 2004-2005

The report analyses the magnitude and incidence of indebtedness among labour

households in the country on the basis of the results of data collected by National Sample Survey Organisation during its 61

st round (2004-2005) of survey. The data is of immense use to the

planners, researchers and policy framers.

Symbol: PDLB – 645 250-2010 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 143.00

8. RURAL LABOUR ENQUIRY REPORT ON CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE OF RURAL LABOUR HOUSEHOLDS - 2004-2005

The report presents analysis of data on consumption expenditure of the rural labour

households collected by the National Sample Survey Organisation during the 61ST

round (2004-05) of the survey. It is hoped that the present publication will prove to be very useful for planning, administration and research purposes in the area.

Symbol: PDLB – 659 260-2012 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 140.00

9. RURAL LABOUR ENQUIRY REPORT ON EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT

OF RURAL LABOUR HOUSEHOLDS - 2004-2005

The report presents analysis of data on employment & unemployment of rural labour households on the basis of the results of data collected by National Sample Survey Organisation during its 61

st round (2004-05) of survey. This report has been brought out in two volumes. Vol.-

I presents the main findings whereas Vol.-II contains „appendices‟ in which detailed data have been presented. The data is of immense use to the planners, researchers and policy framers.

Symbol: PDLB – 631 250-2008 (DSK-II)

Price (per set) : Rs. 525.00

Page 113: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

923

10. CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NUMBERS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL

LABOURERS 1986-87=100) Annual Report- 2011-12 ( Agricultural Year)

This publication, 15th

in the series, contains detailed information on Consumer price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers ( Base: 1986-87=100) for the period July, 2011 to June, 2012. These index numbers, and especially the CPI (AL), play an important role in fixing/revising the minimum wages of agricultural workers.

Symbol: PDL – 560 150-2012 (DSK-II)

Price: Rs. 90.00

11. CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NUMBERS

( For Industrial Workers) 2001=100 Annual Report- 2012

The publication presents serial statistics on Consumer Price Index Number for Industrial Workers with Base: 2001=100 for 78 industrial centres and also for all India. It also contains major group-wise (food, pan, supari, tobacco and intoxicants, fuel and light, housing, clothing, bedding and footwear and miscellaneous) and subgroups wise indices alongwith Linking Factors for conversion of the index to old base (1982=100).

Symbol: PDL – 561 300-2013 (DSK-II)

Price: Rs. 190.00

12. WAGE RATES IN RURAL INDIA

2011-2012 (Agricultural Year)

The publication, 15th

in the series, contains daily wage rate data in respect of 11 Agricultural and 7 Non-Agricultural Occupations for the period July, 2011 to June, 2012. The data on wage rates play an important role in the calculation of State/National Income, drawing up and implementation of wage policy as well as in fixation/revision of support prices of agricultural crops.

Symbol: PDLB – 660 200-2012 (DSK-II)

Price: Rs.90.00

13. NINTH DIGEST OF INDIAN LABOUR RESEARCH 2010

The publication present an annotated bibliography of research studies undertaken by various Universities, Government Departmentsn (Central/State), Social Research Institutes, Employers‟ and Workers‟‟ organizations and individual researchers in the field of labour and labour related issues.

Symbol: PDLB – 644 100-2010 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 109.00

14. TRADE UNION IN INDIA 2010

Trade Unions in India is abiennial publication. It presents information in respect of Workers

and Employers Unions, on Resigtered Trade Unions submitting returns by their sex-wise embership. Besides, it also present data of income and expenditure of Workers as well as Employers Unions.

Symbol: PDLB -662 100-2013(DSK-II)

Page 114: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

924

15. STATISTICAL PROFILE ON WOMEN LABOUR 2009-2011

The publication provides comprehensive and recent most statistics on important aspects of Women Labour in India at one place and helps the researchers to study the gender variations in the population, employment, employment services and training, wages/earnings, participation in trade union movement, slcial sectrity.

Symbol: PDLB -661 150-2012 (DSK-II)

Price: Rs.243.00

16. REPORT ON THE WORKING OF MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 FOR THE YEAR 2012

The report covers informationon employment added, employments in which the

Minimum Wages were fixed for the first time, the Minimum Wages in different scheduled employments prevalent during the year, the range of Minimum Wages, comparative Minimum Wage Rates prevailing in scheduled employments and number of Inspections. Etc.

Symbol: PDLB .664 90-2013 (DSK-II)

Price : Rs. 178.00

17. INDIAN LABOUR YEAR BOOK 2009 and 2010

The Indian Labour Year Book provides , in a compact volume, a general description of various topics, alongwith the latest available data in the field of labour such as Employment, Wages, Levels of Living and Consumer Price Index Numbers, Industrial Relation, Welfare, Housing, Health, Labour Legislation, Labour Administration etc., alongwith relevant supporting statistics and synopsis of Labour Bureau Publications.

Symbol: PDLB .19.2009-2010 (combined) 400-2011 (DSK-III)

Price : Rs. 175.00

18. INDIAN LABOUR STATISTICS 2011 (Bilingual)

A bilingual publication containing serial statistics relating to labour. It presents data on

employment in Factories, Mines, Plantation, Railways, Employment Service and Training, Wages and Earnings, Price Indices, Trade Unions, Industrial Injuries, Absenteeism and Labour Turnover, Social Security, Industrial Disputes and International statistics pertaining to Labour.

Symbol: PDLB – 30-2011 (bilingual) 175-2012 (DSK-III)

Price: Rs. 115.00

19. POCKET BOOK OF LABOUR STATISTICS 2010-11 (Bilingual)

Pocket Book of Labour Statistics presents in a concise form serial statistical data in

respect of various important aspects of Labour. These statistics cover Employment and Training, Wages Earning, Prices, Industrial Disputes, Accidents, Absenteeism, Social Security, etc. Key indicators for India and other countries have also been presented.

Symbol: PDLB – 163-2010-2011 (Bilingual) 250-2012 (DSK-III)

Price: Rs.80.00

Page 115: INDIAN LABOUR JOURNALlabourbureau.gov.in/ILJ_August_2014.pdf · 4.2. For determination of sample size, centres were classified into two categories:- (i) Centres Common with the previous

Indian Labour Journal, August 2014

925

INDIAN BOOK EXCHANGE

Registration No. “G 3/DL(N)-04/0008/2003-05”

Printed by the Printing Unit of Labour Bureau, Shimla

Editor I.S.Negi, Labour Bureau, Shimla and published by

Controller of Publications, Government of India,

Civil Lines, Delhi-110054