18
Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Monday, 24 November 2014, Geneva

Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary,

including military courts

Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized by the Office of the UN

High Commissioner for Human Rights

Monday, 24 November 2014, Geneva

 

Page 2: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

More than military courts

• Investigation and prosecution

• Summary punishment systems

• Extended sense: All courts that handle military penal cases.

Page 3: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

History

• The commanding officer’s need to maintain discipline

• Practical obstacles

• Relationship between warlord and State

• Situation today different

Page 4: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Perceptions of the Armed Forces

• Branch of the executive?

• Experts?

• Heroes?

• Guardians of the State?

• In the long run: The Armed Forces need the confidence of the population at large.

Page 5: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Evident solution?

• Independent courts

• Fully civilianized or some compromise solution?

Page 6: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Trends in Military Justice

• Numerous changes in a large number of national military justice systems in recent years or decades.

• Simplification necessary to see trends.

Page 7: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Two groups

• “Anglo-American” systems based on courts-martial convened for the individual case, and

• “European continental” systems based on standing courts.

Page 8: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Distribution along an axis

Courts-martial convened for the ind. case

Standing military courts

Specia-lized civilian courts

General civilian courts in peace

General civilian courts in peace and war

Page 9: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

From left to right

• In more than a dozen countries

• Exeption: Australia at status quo

• Minor exception: Germany centralized cases from missions abroad to one court

Page 10: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Human rights influence

• ECHR Article 5 paragraph 1 (a):Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law; …

• ECHR Article 6 paragraph 1:In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

Page 11: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

General distrust

UK media on Iraq prosecutions:

- Are cases covered up?

- Why are you trying to ruin a decorated senior officer’s career by prosecuting him?

- Why have you prosecuted the poor soldier when it was the highly paid officer who should take responsibility?

- Why are you prosecuting anybody for doing a dangerous job in an operation we should never have embarked on in the first place?

Page 12: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Counter-arguments

• Extra-territorial jurisdiction and portability

• Jurisdiction over certain civilians

• Military expertise

Page 13: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

The issue of independence

• Recent example from Norway: Staying the emperor’s friend.

• Courts-martial and the jury system– Members appointed or drawn by lot?– Career after delivering verdict– Anonymity?

• Standing courts: Who decides the career of the judge?

Page 14: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Judge Paavo Alkio’s diary

• Division commander wants more capital punishments.

• The judge focuses on the guilt of the individual accused.

• Did he get his applications for leave granted? To whom were medals awarded?

Page 15: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Suggested conclusions

Trends toward:

•More independence to judges

•Standing courts

•Increased right to elect trial instead of summary procedures

•Increased right to legal representation

Page 16: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Tendency to shift from military to civilian jurisdiction

• Restricting the competence of military courts

• Abolishing military courts

• Abolishing military prosecution

Page 17: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

The important question

• Should military commanders give up their control of the military justice?

• However: Should the process run to the other extreme?

• Or is there a «golden middle way» to be sought?

Page 18: Independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary, including military courts Presentation by Arne Willy Dahl at expert consultation organized

Thank you for your attention