21
Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment Caroline Tuit and Jeffrey Rominger National Environmental Measurement Conference August 11, 2017 Washington DC

Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

Caroline Tuit and Jeffrey Rominger

National Environmental Measurement Conference

August 11, 2017Washington DC

Page 2: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

2Copyright Gradient 2017

PAH Urban Sediment Sites = High Stakes Allocations

ROD Estimated Clean-up Costs

• Ottawa River ($49 Million)

• Thea Foss Waterway ($105 Million)

• Lower Duwamish Waterway ($342 Million)

• Gowanus Canal ($506 Million)

• Portland Harbor ($1.05 Billion)

• Extremely expensive clean-ups

• Multiple Contaminants of Concern

• Multiple Sources

• Complex Histories

• Dynamic Environment

• Complex and Weathered Fingerprints

Forensics tools are typically needed to allocate PAH sources

Page 3: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

3Copyright Gradient 2017

Key Findings

• PAHs are subject to extensive weathering in sediment sites

• Water-washing models can approximate weathering effects on PAH fingerprints

• PAH source apportionment models rely on well-defined end-members

• Evaluation of weathering trends in PAH source apportionment models can

▪ Link upland sources to sediment end-members

▪ Identify where weathering trends may obscure mixing trends

Page 4: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

4Copyright Gradient 2017

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

• PAHs can be divided into parent (8270) or alkylated (8270 SIM)

• Typical anthropogenic sources:

▪ Pyrogenic (burning of coal, petroleum, wood etc.; coal tar; creosote)

▪ Petrogenic (oil; gasoline; diesel; asphalt)

▪ Urban background (weathered mix of petrogenic and pyrogenic sources)

• The pattern of alkylated PAHs can distinguish the PAH source as petrogenic or pyrogenic

• Typical source concentrations

▪ Crude oil: 0.2 to 7 wt %

▪ Coal tar: up to 70 wt %

0

0.2

Petrogenic

0

0.1

0.2

0.3Pyrogenic

LMW (2-3 ring) HMW (4-6 ring)

0

0.1

0.2

N0

N1

N2

N3

N4

AC

YA

CE F0 F1 F2 F3 A0

P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

D0

D1

D2

D3 FL PY

FL1

BA

A C0

C1

C2

C3

C4

BB

FB

KF

BA

P IN DA

GH

I

Urban Runoff

2-Methylnaphthalene

Page 5: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

5Copyright Gradient 2017

PAH Weathering• Evaporation—most PAHs are

non-volatile

• Biodegradation—Slow, mechanisms are poorly understood

▪ Rate and extent correlated with the number of aromatic rings and the presence/absence of side chains

• Water-washing—Controlled by the aqueous solubility of the individual PAH

▪ Solubility of PAHs decreases with number of rings and increasing alkylation

Sources: Haritash, AK; Kaushik, CP. 2009. "Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review." J. Hazard. Mater. 169(1-3):1-15; Neff, JM; Burns, WA. 1996. "Estimation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in the water column based on tissue residues in mussels and salmon: An equilibrium partitioning approach." Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15(12):2240-2253.

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

100 150 200 250 300

Log

K OW

Molecular WeightAfter Neff and Burns (1996)

PAHs

P0/A0 Series

N0 Series

C0/BaA Series

Water-washing may approximate other weathering

processes

Page 6: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

6Copyright Gradient 2017

PAH Weathering

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

N C1-N C2-N C3-N C4-N

Petrogenic Weathering Trend

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

N C1-N C2-N C3-N C4-N

Pyrogenic Weathering Trends

Weathering (e.g., water-washing) can alter PAH distributions preferentially removing low molecular weight (LMW) and parent PAHs

Page 7: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

7Copyright Gradient 2017

PAH Forensics – Typical Allocation Techniques

Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

• A statistical tool widely used to determine the number of dominant chemical fingerprints present in the system and examination of relationships between samples and putative sources

• Can look at many variables (PAH analytes) at once

Important considerations

• Evaluate data for analytical artifacts such as non-detects and low concentrations

• Normalize data to eliminate bias due to concentration differences (total normalization) or analytes (variance scaling)

1

23

Page 8: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

8Copyright Gradient 2017

PAH Forensics – Typical Allocation TechniquesReceptor Modeling

• Many Techniques: EPA UMIX; EPA Positive Matrix Factorization; Polytopic Vector Analysis; Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS)

• An iterative linear algebra method in which the end-member fingerprints that contribute to the sample data are identified and optimized such that the unexplained variance in the data is minimized

• Receptor modeling further identifies the fraction that each end-member contributes to every sample

Important Considerations

• Well defined end-members

• Link end-members to site-specific sources

• Evaluate how weathering effects source signatures and end-members

EWP: 55% Tar: 44%

ModelMeas.

Page 9: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

9Copyright Gradient 2017

Weathering Model

• Based on theoretical model of Short and Heinz (1997) used to identify Exxon Valdez oil in Prince William Sound

• Assumptions:

▪ Water-washing dominates weathering

▪ Equilibration of a small amount of PAH-containing material (NAPL) with a larger volume of clean water

▪ PAH concentration calculated separately based on individual KOW

• Iterative Depletion: after equilibration, the volume of water is replenished with clean water, and the process repeats itself

• The ratio of clean water to NAPL is specified VWater/VNAPL ~10

• Higher volume ratios would result in faster weathering; Burns et al. (1997) used 600-700

Short and Heintz (1997); Kow available in Neff and Burns, (1996); Burns et al. (1997).

Page 10: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

10Copyright Gradient 2017

Model Equations

𝐶𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿,𝑖𝑉𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿 = 𝐶𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿,𝑓𝑉𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿 + 𝐶𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟,𝑓𝑉𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟

Where:CNAPL,i = The initial PAH concentration in the NAPLVNAPL = The volume of NAPLCNAPL,f = The finishing PAH concentration in the NAPL volume after a

water-washing periodCwater,f = The finishing PAH concentration in the waterVwater = The volume of water in contact with the NAPL

𝐶𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿,𝑓 = 𝐾𝑜𝑤𝐶𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟,𝑓

𝐶𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿,𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 = 𝐶𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿,𝑖 1 +𝑉𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟

𝑉𝑁𝐴𝑃𝐿𝐾𝑜𝑤

−𝑛

Page 11: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

11Copyright Gradient 2017

Important Considerations

• NOT quantitative—allows evaluation of fingerprint evolution, not age dating of spills

• Most useful in regions with sediment disturbance:

▪ Tidal resuspension

▪ Storm surge

▪ Propeller wash

▪ Dredging

• Requires well known starting compositions

Page 12: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

12Copyright Gradient 2017

Literature Study: Creosote WeatheringAfter Stout et al. (2005); Stout et al. (2001); and Brenner et al. (2002)

• PAH weathering based on the Eagle Harbor Superfund Site

• Identified 3 source compositions

▪ Creosote: pyrogenic; enriched in naphthalene and phenanthrene; high concentration

▪ Natural Background: weathered pyrogenic; tPAH < 5 mg/kg

▪ Urban Background: enriched in HMW PAHs; tPAH 10-20 mg/kg

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Creosote

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

Natural Background

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

N0

N1

N2

N3

N4

Acl

Ace F0 F1 F2 F3 AN P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

D0

D1

D2

D3 FL PY

FP1

BaA C

0C

1C

2C

3C

4B

bF

BkF

BaP ID DA

BgP

Urban Background

Page 13: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

13Copyright Gradient 2017

Literature Study: Creosote Weathering

• Creosote Weathering

▪ Loss of the LMW PAHs

▪ Loss of parent PAHs

▪ Pyrogenic ratios are still apparent in HMW PAHs

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Creosote

0

0.1

0.2Slightly Weathered

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

Moderately Weathered

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

N0

N1

N2

N3

N4

Acl

Ace F0 F1 F2 F3 AN P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

D0

D1

D2

D3 FL PY

FP1

BaA C

0C

1C

2C

3C

4B

bF

BkF

BaP ID DA

BgP

Severely Weathered

Page 14: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

14Copyright Gradient 2017

Principal Component Analysis: Creosote Weathering

• Modeled water washing trend follows literature weathering trend

• Non-detect effect seen in final water-washing steps

Upland Source

Fresh

Slightly

Moderately

Severely

Urban Background

Natural Background

Fresh

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

PC

2 (

18

.4%

)

PC1(60.1%)

Upland Source

Fresh

Slightly

Moderately

Severely

Urban Background

Natural Background

Fresh

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

PC

3(1

6.1

%)

PC1(60.1%)

Page 15: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

15Copyright Gradient 2017

Literature Study: Creosote Weathering

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Creosote

0

0.1

0.2

Slightly Weathered

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

Moderately Weathered

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

N0

N1

N2

N3

N4

Acl

Ace F0 F1 F2 F3 AN P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

D0

D1

D2

D3 FL PY

FP1

BaA C

0C

1C

2C

3C

4B

bF

BkF

BaP ID DA

BgP

Severely Weathered

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

N0

N1

N2

N3

N4

Acl

Ace F0 F1 F2 F3 AN P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

D0

D1

D2

D3 FL PY

FP1

BaA C

0C

1C

2C

3C

4B

bF

BkF

BaP ID DA

BgP

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Modeled Fingerprint

Page 16: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

16Copyright Gradient 2017

Case Study 2: MGP Impacted

• Urban Sediment Superfund Site

• History of Combined Sewer Overflows and Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Operations

• Remedial Investigation with publicly available tPAH17

analyses

• Total normalized; Excludes samples with > 30% non-detected (ND) analytes and concentrations < 1 mg/kg

Question: How does weathering of MGP tar change the parent PAH fingerprint?

Page 17: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

17Copyright Gradient 2017

Principal Component Analysis of Parent PAH Fingerprints

-0.3

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

PC

2(1

2.7

%)

PC1 (68.7%)

Native Sediment

Sediment

1

3

2

3 PotentialSources

Page 18: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

18Copyright Gradient 2017

Principal Component Analysis of Parent PAH Fingerprints

-0.3

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

PC

2(1

2.7

%)

PC1 (68.7%)

Native Sediment

Sediment

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Page 19: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

19Copyright Gradient 2017

Principal Component Analysis of Parent PAH Fingerprints

Crude oilDiesel

#4 Fuel

#6 Fuel

Hi S gas oil

-0.3

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

PC

2(1

2.7

%)

PC1 (68.7%)

Native Sediment

Sediment

MGP Tar (EPRI 2000)

Petroleum Sources (EPRI 2000)

Page 20: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

20Copyright Gradient 2017

Principal Component Analysis of Parent PAH Fingerprints

Crude oilDiesel

-0.3

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

PC

2(1

2.7

%)

PC1 (68.7%)

Native Sediment

Sediment

MGP Tar (EPRI 2000)

Petroleum Sources (EPRI 2000)

Most of the Sediment impacts can be explained by weathering of the MGP tar sources

Page 21: Incorporation of Weathering in PAH Source Apportionment

21Copyright Gradient 2017

Conclusions

• It is critically important to evaluate weathering trends in Principal Component and Receptor Modeling

▪ No fingerprint will survive contact with the environment intact

• Weathering can shift pyrogenic fingerprints into petrogenic patterns for LMW PAHs

• Weathering trends can obscure mixing trends

▪ Where this occurs it may be important to incorporate tPAHconcentration or other source tracers into the PAH analysis

• Weathering can help identify more appropriate source compositions for use in receptor modeling