Income and Substitution Effect

INCOME AND SUBSTITUTION EFFECTS:

APPLICATIONS

INCOME AND SUBSTITUTION EFFECTS:APPLICATIONS

Subsidy on one product only v. Increase in income (at equal cost to government)

Consumption v. Saving (Inter-temporal choice)

Labour v. Leisure

AN INCREASE in INCOME v. A SUBSIDY on ONE PRODUCT ONLY

Involves equal cost to the government Example: food stamps used in the US

for welfare recipients (Ireland: television licence, electricity, transport, … )

AN INCREASE in INCOME v. A SUBSIDY on ONE PRODUCT ONLY

Mxpxp AA 2211

Mxpxtp BB 2211

Budget constraint is given by

The government can

(1) give a subsidy on food (x1)

(2) give a increase in income

BCC txMxpxp 12211

Note: Equal cost to the government

AN INCREASE in INCOME v A SUBSIDY on ONE PRODUCT ONLY

But which makes the consumer better off ?

X2

X1

A

U0



X2

X1

A

The subsidy on food leaves the consumer at B (better off than at A)

B

U0

U1



X2

X1

A

The subsidy on food leaves the consumer at B (better off than at A)

B

U0

U1

Mxpxtp BB 2211

Mxpxp AA 2211


To illustrate the equal cost nature of the the subsidy v. the income increase, you draw a line parallel to the original budget constraint which passes through the point B (as B must be affordable after the income increase).



X2

X1

A

The increase in income leaves the consumer

at C (better off than at B)

B

C

U0

U1

U2



X2

X1

A

The increase in income leaves the consumer

at C (better off than at B)

B

C

U0

U1

U2

BCC txMxpxp 12211

CONSUMPTION v. SAVING

Persons often receive income in “lumps”, e.g. monthly salary, yearly bonus, tax rebate ...

How is a lump of income spread over the following month, year, (saving now for consumption later)?

How is consumption financed by borrowing now against income to be received at the end of the month?


Divide time into two periods (today and tomorrow)

Assume that a person has income in the first period only (today)

Assume that a person consumes in both periods (today and tomorrow)


ttt YCi

C

11

1This is equivalent to

the budget constraint we met before, so we

can apply the same techniques to analyse

changes in consumption and

saving.Mxpxp 2211

Where Ct is consumption today, Ct+1 is consumption tomorrow, i is the interest rate and Y is income


Divide time into two periods (today and tomorrow)

Assume that a person has income in both periods (today and tomorrow)

Assume that a person consumes in both periods (today and tomorrow)


11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

With income in both periods the budget constraint looks like this

Income in period t and t+1


ttt YCi

C

11

1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

represents the current “price” of future consumption

1/ 1+i

1/1+irepresents the current “price” or “value” of

future income


Consumption tomorrow is called saving


ttt YCi

C

11

1(Income in period t only)

What happens if the interest rate increases? Ct+1

Ct Yt

(1+i)Yt


ttt YCi

C

11



Ct Yt

(1+i)Yt

i The budget line pivots out from Yt


ttt YCi

C

11



Ct Yt

(I+i)Yt

i

There is an increase in the value of consumption tomorrow, i.e. the price of future consumption decreases


ttt YCi

C

11


Ct+1

Ct Yt

(I+i)Yt

i

Slope of the budget line = -(1+i*)

Slope of the budget line = -(1+i)


ttt YCi

C

11


Ct+1

Ct Yt

(I+i)Yt

i

ab

Isolating the income and substitution effects


ttt YCi

C

11


Ct+1

Ct Yt

(I+i)Yt

i The substitution effect is a to b. Ct and Ct+1 ( St)

ab


ttt YCi

C

11


Ct+1

Ct Yt

(I+i)Yt

i

cb

The income effect is b to c, usually Ct and Ct+1 ( St)


ttt YCi

C

11


Ct+1

Ct Yt

(I+i)Yt

i

a

Overall effect is unclear Why? IE: Ct

SE: Ct

Overall: ?Ct ?StC??

(1+i)Yt+Yt+1

CONSUMPTION v. SAVING(Income in both periods)

Ct+1

Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

(Yt,Yt+1)

Yt+1/ (1+i) Yt+1

(1+i)Yt+Yt+1

CONSUMPTION v. SAVING(Income in both periods)

Ct+1

Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

Yt+1/ (1+i) Yt+1

A lender type person

A lender consumers less in period t than their income in period t (Ct<Yt)

(1+i)Yt+Yt+1

CONSUMPTION v SAVING(Income in both periods)

Ct+1

Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

Yt+1/ (1+i) Yt+1

A borrower type person

A borrower consumers more in period t than their income in period t (Ct>Yt)



Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

The budget constraint pivots around (Yt,Yt+1) and the

outcome can be different for borrowers and lenders.

(Yt,Yt+1)



Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

(Yt,Yt+1)

LENDER

CONSUMPTION v SAVING

(Income in both periods)


Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

(Yt,Yt+1)

LENDER

Utility is higher but we cannot be certain if Ct+1 or Ct rise or fall



Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

(Yt,Yt+1)

LENDER

Could end up here



Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

(Yt,Yt+1)

LENDER

Or here


(Income in both periods)


Ct Yt

Yt+1

11 1

1

1

1

tttt Yi

YCi

C

BORROWER

(Yt,Yt+1)Utility is lower but…….??


Do the case of a decrease in interest rates.

You can also show the income and substitution effects in the two period model.

LABOUR and LEISUREFramework 24 hours a day There is only two things you can do with

your time–Work (paid labour market)– Leisure– Ignores housework (extension possible)

You divide all you time between these two activities.

When you work in the paid labour market, you are paid a market wage.

LABOUR and LEISURE

24.w = w.Leisure + p.Consumption

Rearranging:

Where 24.w is the value of initial endowment, w.Leisure is the amount of the endowment spent on leisure and p.Consumption is the amount of endowment spent on consumption

C= 24w/p – (w/p)Leisure

LABOUR and LEISURE

What happens if the wage rate increases?

C

Leisure 24h

24w/p

Slope = -w/p

LABOUR and LEISURE

C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w The budget line pivots out from here

24w2/p

What happens if the wage rate increases?

W2 > W1

LABOUR and LEISUREMore labour or more leisure…….?

Use income and substitution effects

C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w

NB: Is leisure a normal or an inferior good?


C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

A


C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w

Total Effect ?

A

Depends (to some extent) on whether Leisure is assumed to be normal or inferior


C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w

SE: A to B

A

IE: Depends on whether Leisure is assumed to be normal or inferior


C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w

SE: A to B

AB

IE: Depends on whether Leisure is assumed to be normal or inferior


C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w

AB

Overall we could end up here if leisure is “very normal”

C


C

Leisure24h

24w1/p

w

SE: A to B

AB

IE: B to C

Depends on whether Leisure is assumed to be normal or inferior

C

LABOUR and LEISURE

Increase in wage rate

Substitution effect: w price of leisure leisure and labour supply

Income effect: w income (value of the initial endowment) leisure and labour supply

IF LEISURE IS A NORMAL GOOD

Overall effect: Leisure?? Labour Supply??

Documents

Income and Substitution Effect