Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
§ In re: § Chapter 11 § MEMORIAL PRODUCTION § Case No. 17-______ (___) PARTNERS LP, et al., § § (Joint Administration Requested) Debtors.1 § (Emergency Hearing Requested) §
EMERGENCY MOTION OF DEBTORS PURSUANT TO
11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a), 345(b), 363(b)(1), 363(c)(1), AND 364(a) AND FED. R. BANKR. P. 6003 AND 6004
FOR INTERIM AND FINAL ORDERS (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) CONTINUE THEIR EXISTING CASH
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, (B) MAINTAIN BUSINESS FORMS AND EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS, (C) CONTINUE INTERCOMPANY
ARRANGEMENTS, AND (D) CONTINUE USING CORPORATE PAYMENT CARDS; (II) EXTENDING THE TIME TO COMPLY WITH, OR SEEK
WAIVER OF, THE REQUIREMENTS OF 11 U.S.C. § 345(b); (III) WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 7B OF THE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLEX
CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASES; AND (IV) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are: Memorial Production Partners LP (6667); Memorial Production Partners GP LLC; MEMP Services LLC (1887); Memorial Production Operating LLC; Memorial Production Finance Corporation (3356); WHT Energy Partners LLC; WHT Carthage LLC; Memorial Midstream LLC; Beta Operating Company, LLC; Columbus Energy, LLC; Rise Energy Operating, LLC; Rise Energy Minerals, LLC; Rise Energy Beta, LLC; San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); and Memorial Energy Services LLC. The Debtors’ mailing address is 500 Dallas Street, Suite 1600, Houston, Texas 77002.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 56
2
THIS MOTION SEEKS AN ORDER THAT MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT YOU. IF YOU OPPOSE THE MOTION, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE MOVING PARTY TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE. IF YOU AND THE MOVING PARTY CANNOT AGREE, YOU MUST FILE A RESPONSE AND SEND A COPY TO THE MOVING PARTY. YOU MUST FILE AND SERVE YOUR RESPONSE WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE THIS WAS SERVED ON YOU. YOUR RESPONSE MUST STATE WHY THE MOTION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. IF YOU DO NOT FILE A TIMELY RESPONSE, THE RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU OPPOSE THE MOTION AND HAVE NOT REACHED AN AGREEMENT, YOU MUST ATTEND THE HEARING. UNLESS THE PARTIES AGREE OTHERWISE, THE COURT MAY CONSIDER EVIDENCE AT THE HEARING AND MAY DECIDE THE MOTION AT THE HEARING.
REPRESENTED PARTIES SHOULD ACT THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY.
EMERGENCY RELIEF HAS BEEN REQUESTED. IF THE COURT CONSIDERS THE MOTION ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS, THEN YOU WILL HAVE LESS THAN 21 DAYS TO ANSWER. IF YOU OBJECT TO THE REQUESTED RELIEF OR IF YOU BELIEVE THAT THE EMERGENCY CONSIDERATION IS NOT WARRANTED, YOU SHOULD FILE AN IMMEDIATE RESPONSE.
Memorial Production Partners LP (“MEMP”) and its debtor affiliates in the
above-captioned chapter 11 cases, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the
“Debtors”), respectfully represent as follows in support of this motion (this “Motion”):
Relief Requested
1. Pursuant to sections 105(a), 345(b), 363(b)(1), 363(c)(1), and 364(a) of
title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and Rules 6003 and 6004 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), the Debtors request
(i) interim and final authority to (a) continue to operate their existing cash management system
(the “Cash Management System”), as described herein, including the continued maintenance of
existing bank accounts (the “Bank Accounts”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(“Wells Fargo”), and continue transferring funds among the Debtors and their non-Debtor
affiliates in the ordinary course of business, consistent with their prepetition practices; (b) honor
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 2 of 56
3
certain prepetition obligations related to the Cash Management System; (c) maintain existing
business forms; and (d) continue using Corporate Payment Cards and pay all obligations related
thereto; (ii) an extension of time to comply with, or seek waiver of the requirements of, section
345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code for 45 days (or such later time as may be agreed to by the Office
of the United States Trustee for Region 7 (the “U.S. Trustee”) or as approved by the Court);
(iii) a waiver of Rule 7B of the Complex Chapter 11 Guidelines (defined below); and (iv) related
relief.
2. The Debtors also request that the Court authorize and direct applicable
financial institutions to receive, process, honor, and pay all checks presented for payment and
electronic payment requests relating to the foregoing to the extent that sufficient funds are on
deposit and standing in the Debtors’ credit in the applicable bank accounts to cover such
payment, whether such checks were presented or electronic requests were submitted before, on,
or after the Petition Date (as defined below), and that Wells Fargo or such other financial
institutions be authorized to rely on the Debtors’ designation of any particular check or electronic
payment request as appropriate pursuant to this Motion without any duty of further inquiry and
without liability for following the Debtors’ instructions. The Debtors further request that the
Court authorize Wells Fargo or such other financial institutions to continue to charge Bank Fees
and to charge back returned items to the Bank Accounts, whether such items are dated before,
on, or after the Petition Date.
3. A proposed form of order granting the relief requested herein on an
interim basis is annexed hereto as Exhibit A (the “Proposed Interim Order”) and, pending a
final hearing on the relief requested herein, on a final basis as Exhibit B (the “Proposed Final
Order”).
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 3 of 56
4
Jurisdiction
4. This Court has jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference to Bankruptcy Judges, General Order 2012-6 (S.D.
Tex. May 24, 2012) (Hinojosa, C.J.). This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).
Venue is proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.
Background
5. On the date hereof (the “Petition Date”), each of the Debtors commenced
with this Court a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors continue
to operate their business and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to
sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee, examiner, or statutory
committee of creditors has been appointed in these chapter 11 cases. Contemporaneously
herewith, the Debtors have filed a motion requesting joint administration of these chapter 11
cases pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b) and Rule 1015-1 of the Bankruptcy Local Rules for
the Southern District of Texas (the “Local Rules”).
6. Additional information regarding the circumstances leading to the
commencement of these chapter 11 cases and information regarding the Debtors’ business and
capital structure is set forth in the Declaration of Robert L. Stillwell, Jr. in Support of the
Debtors’ Chapter 11 Petitions and Related Requests for Relief (the “Stillwell Declaration”),
which has been filed contemporaneously herewith.
The Debtors’ Cash Management System
7. In the ordinary course of their business, the Debtors have historically used
the Cash Management System to fund their operations, as well as the operations of certain of
their non-Debtor affiliates. The Cash Management System is tailored to meet the Debtors’
operating needs as a manager of oil and natural gas producing properties. It allows the Debtors
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 4 of 56
5
to efficiently collect and transfer the cash generated by their business and pay their financial and
other obligations. It also enables the Debtors to facilitate their cash forecasting and reporting,
monitor their collection and disbursement of funds, and maintain control over the administration
of the Bank Accounts. A general overview of the movement of cash through the Cash
Management System is illustrated by the flow of funds chart attached as Exhibit C hereto.
8. The Cash Management System includes eleven Bank Accounts that are
held by four entities: (i) the Memorial Production Operating LLC (“MPO”; such accounts, the
“MPO Accounts”); (ii) Beta Operating Company, LLC (“Beta”; such accounts, the “Beta
Accounts”); (iii) San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (“San Pedro”; such accounts, the “San
Pedro Accounts”); and (iv) MEMP Services LLC (“MEMP Services”; such accounts, the
“MEMP Services Accounts”). Of those eleven Bank Accounts, one Bank Account serves as the
Debtors’ main operating account; one Bank Account is a restricted money market account which
serves to cash collateralize the Debtors’ obligations to Wells Fargo in connection with the
Debtors’ use of corporate credit and purchase cards (as described below, the “Corporate Credit
Cards”); and the remaining nine Bank Accounts are zero-balance accounts (each, a “Zero-
Balance Account”) that are used principally to make disbursements to third parties and, in one
case, to collect receipts from certain operations.2 All of the Bank Accounts are maintained with
Wells Fargo, an authorized bank depository (as such, an “Authorized Depository”) under the
Operating Guidelines and Reporting Requirements for Debtors in Possession and Trustees (the
“UST Operating Guidelines”) published by the U.S. Trustee.
9. The Cash Management System is designed to facilitate the Debtors’
receipts and disbursement of funds. The Debtors’ receipts are generally derived from (i) the 2 The Bank Accounts do not include two deposit accounts maintained by the Debtors’ non-Debtor affiliates MEMP S-1, Inc. and MEMP S-2, Inc., respectively.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 5 of 56
6
sales of oil and natural gas from wells operated by the Debtors; (ii) working interest
disbursements from wells in which the Debtors have a non-operating interest; and (iii) regular
cash payments from counterparties to the Debtors’ derivatives contracts (the “Hedges”). The
Debtors’ disbursements generally include (i) the expenses of developing and operating their oil
and natural gas wells; (ii) joint interest billings owed to parties that operate wells in which the
Debtors have a non-operating interest; (iii) royalties and working interest payments owed in
accordance with the Debtors’ oil and gas leases or under grants of overriding royalty interests;
(iv) taxes; (v) corporate overhead expenses; and (vi) payments on account of long-term debt. As
discussed below, each component of the Cash Management System is integral to these processes.
A. The MPO Accounts
10. MPO is the Debtors’ main operating subsidiary and is the most financially
active entity in the Debtors’ enterprise. It enters into the majority of the Debtors’ contracts. On
behalf of itself and its affiliates, MPO collects most of the Debtors’ revenues and makes most of
the disbursements necessary to operate the Debtors’ business.
i. The MPO Operating Account
11. MPO conducts most of its financial activity through a Bank Account
ending in 3030 (the “MPO Operating Account”). The MPO Operating Account is funded by
receipts from the Debtors’ onshore oil and gas business and Hedge receivables. MPO uses the
MPO Operating Account to satisfy many of the Debtors’ obligations to third parties, including
payments on account of the Debtors’ long-term debt obligations, purchasing cards, certain
Hedges, Bank Fees, taxes, and trade obligations paid by wire transfer. The Debtors use the MPO
Operating Account in MPO’s role as “central banker” for the Debtors, collecting most of the
Debtors’ cash receipts and disbursing funds to the Zero-Balance Accounts as necessary to satisfy
the Debtors’ payment obligations. The MPO Operating Account also serves as the central
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 6 of 56
7
concentration account to which all funds from the Zero-Balance Accounts are swept at the end of
each day. Affiliates’ intercompany obligations to MPO that arise from MPO’s payments to third
parties are not settled in cash but are reflected by means of book entries in the Debtors’ books
and records. As of the Petition Date, the MPO Operating Account had a balance of
approximately $31.7 million.
ii. The MPO Zero-Balance Accounts
12. In addition to the MPO Operating Account, MPO maintains two Zero-
Balance Accounts, ending in 2179 (the “MPO Royalty Account”) and 2164 (the “MPO A/P
Account,” and together with the MPO Royalty Account, the “MPO Zero-Balance Accounts”),
respectively, that are used to make disbursements to third parties. Each day, the MPO Zero-
Balance Accounts begin with a zero balance. Throughout the day, MPO funds the MPO Zero-
Balance Accounts as needed from the MPO Operating Account and makes disbursements from
the MPO Zero-Balance Accounts. At the end of each day, any funds remaining in the MPO
Zero-Balance Accounts are automatically returned to the MPO Operating Account. The MPO
A/P Account is used to make disbursements to third parties by ACH, check, and virtual card (as
described below, “V-Card”) on account of the Debtors’ trade obligations, taxes, and joint
interest billings. The MPO Royalty Account is used to pay lease royalties and working interest
disbursements to third parties.
iii. The MPO Cash Collateral Account
13. In addition to the MPO Operating Account and the MPO Zero-Balance
Accounts, the Debtors maintain a restricted money market account ending in 0132 (the “MPO
Cash Collateral Account”) that serves to cash collateralize the Debtors’ obligations to Wells
Fargo with respect to the Debtors’ use of the Corporate Credit Cards. In the ordinary course of
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 7 of 56
8
business, the Debtors maintain Corporate Credit Cards (discussed in further detail below) that are
issued by Wells Fargo (in such capacity, the “Credit Card Provider”) pursuant to that certain
WellsOne Commercial Card Agreement, dated on or around July 6, 2016 (as amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Card Agreement”), between the
Credit Card Provider and MPO. The Debtors’ obligations to the Credit Card Provider under the
Card Agreement were previously secured by certain collateral pursuant to that certain Credit
Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2011, by and among MPO, as borrower, MEMP, as parent
guarantor, Wells Fargo, as administrative agent, the lenders party thereto, and the other parties
thereto (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “RBL
Credit Agreement”).
14. Prior to the Petition Date, the Credit Card Provider and MPO amended the
Card Agreement to require the Debtors to open the MPO Cash Collateral Account and fund that
account with $150,000 (the “Collateral”). In addition, MPO and the Credit Card Provider
entered into that certain Security Agreement: Immediately Restricted Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association Deposit Account, dated as of January 13, 2017 (the “Security Agreement”),
pursuant to which the Debtors granted the Credit Card Provider a valid and perfected, non-
avoidable first-priority lien on the Collateral in the MPO Cash Collateral Account. Pursuant to
the terms of the Security Agreement, the Debtors are not permitted to make debits or
withdrawals from the MPO Cash Collateral Account, and, as of the Petition Date, the MPO Cash
Collateral Account maintained a balance of $150,000.
B. The Beta Accounts
15. Beta maintains two Zero-Balance Accounts ending in 1869 (the “Beta
Main Account”) and 0759 (the “Beta A/P Account”), respectively. The Beta Main Account is
funded by receipts from the Debtors’ offshore California oil and gas business and by
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 8 of 56
9
intercompany disbursements from MPO. It is used (i) to make disbursements to the Beta A/P
Account and (ii) to make disbursements to third parties by debit or wire transfer on account of
government fees, lease royalties, and other operating expenses of Beta. Any funds in the Beta
Main Account at the end of each day are automatically returned to the MPO Operating Account.
The Beta A/P Account functions like the MPO Zero-Balance Accounts. It is funded as needed
from the Beta Main Account and used to make disbursements by ACH, check, and V-Card to
third parties on account of certain trade obligations, taxes, and other operating expenses of Beta.
Any funds remaining in the Beta A/P Account at the end of each day are automatically returned
to the Beta Main Account and then transferred to the MPO Operating Account as noted above.
C. The San Pedro Accounts
16. San Pedro maintains two Zero-Balance Accounts ending in 4044 (the
“San Pedro Main Account”) and 0767 (the “San Pedro A/P Account”), respectively, which
are used to support its obligations related to the Debtors’ ownership and use of a federally
regulated pipeline off the coast of southern California. The San Pedro Main Account is funded
through intercompany disbursements from the MPO Operating Account and is used (i) to make
disbursements to the San Pedro A/P Account and (ii) to make disbursements to third parties by
wire transfer. Any funds remaining in the San Pedro Main Account at the end of each day are
automatically returned to the MPO Operating Account. The San Pedro A/P Account functions
like the Beta A/P Account. It is funded as needed from the San Pedro Main Account and is used
to make disbursements to third parties by ACH, check, and V-Card on account of certain trade
obligations, taxes, and other operating expenses of San Pedro. Any funds remaining in the San
Pedro A/P Account at the end of each day are automatically returned to the San Pedro Main
Account and then transferred to the MPO Operating Account.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 9 of 56
10
D. The MEMP Services Accounts
17. MEMP Services maintains three Zero-Balance Accounts ending in 0902
(the “MEMP Services Main Account”), 0910 (the “MEMP Services Payroll Account”), and
1926 (the “MEMP Services A/P Account”), respectively. The MEMP Services Main Account
is funded by intercompany disbursements from the MPO Operating Account and is used (i) to
make disbursements to the MEMP Services Payroll Account and the MEMP Services A/P
Account and (ii) to make certain payroll disbursements by wire transfer. Any funds remaining in
the MEMP Services Main Account at the end of each day are automatically returned to the MPO
Operating Account.
18. The MEMP Services Payroll Account and the MEMP Services A/P
Account function like the Beta A/P Account and the San Pedro A/P Account. They are funded
as needed by intercompany disbursements from the MEMP Services Main Account. The MEMP
Services Payroll Account is used to make most of the Debtors’ payroll and benefits
disbursements by reverse wire transfers (i.e. funds drawdown requests) to a deposit account held
by ADP, the Debtors’ payroll processor. The MEMP Services A/P Account is used to make
disbursements to employees and other third parties by ACH or check on account of employee
expense reimbursements and certain employee benefit obligations. Any funds remaining in the
MEMP Services Payroll Account or the MEMP Services A/P Account at the end of each day are
automatically returned to the MEMP Services Main Account and then transferred to the MPO
Operating Account.
E. Bank Fees
19. In the ordinary course of their business, the Debtors incur and pay, honor,
or allow to be deducted from the appropriate Bank Accounts certain service charges and other
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 10 of 56
11
fees, costs, and expenses charged by Wells Fargo and other financial institutions (collectively,
the “Bank Fees”). The Bank Fees collectively average approximately $7,000 per month.
F. The Debtors’ Corporate Payment Cards
20. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors maintain Corporate Credit
Cards that are issued by the Credit Card Provider. The Credit Card Provider extends credit and
purchasing cards to certain employees of the Debtors, which those employees use to pay for
business-related expenses such as travel, lodging, meals, fuel, and other reasonable and
documented expenses incurred in operating the Debtors’ business. Approximately 28 employees
hold Corporate Credit Cards. The invoices for the Corporate Credit Cards are paid by the
Debtors via direct debit on a monthly basis. The Debtors estimate they incur liabilities of
approximately $40,000 per month on account of the Corporate Credit Cards and that, as of the
Petition Date, less than $10,000 in prepetition amounts is owed on account of the Corporate
Credit Cards. Prior to the Petition Date, the MPO Cash Collateral Account was funded in the
amount of $150,000 to secure the Debtors’ monthly payment obligations to the Credit Card
Provider.
21. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors also maintain V-Cards and
Fuel Cards (the “Fuel Cards”; collectively, with the Corporate Credit Cards and the V-Cards,
the “Corporate Payment Cards”). The V-Cards function as single-use virtual credit cards. The
V-Cards are issued by a third-party vendor, SunGard (in such capacity, the “V-Card Provider”),
which also processes the Debtors’ V-Card payments. When the Debtors need to make a payment
by V-Card, the V-Card Provider provides the payment recipient with a single-use virtual credit
card number. Shortly thereafter, the V-Card Provider debits the payment amount from the
Debtors’ applicable Bank Account. Each V-Card can be used only once and expires if not used
within a certain period of time. The Debtors estimate they incur liabilities of approximately
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 11 of 56
12
$1.2 million per month on account of the V-Cards, in addition to nominal maintenance and
transaction fees charged by the V-Card Provider. Because the Bank Accounts from which the V-
Card payments are debited are fully funded, the Debtors do not owe any prepetition amounts on
account of the V-Cards.
22. The Fuel Cards function like the Corporate Credit Cards but, unlike the
Corporate Credit Cards, the Fuel Cards are used solely to pay for fuel for the Debtors’ vehicles
used in the field. The Fuel Cards are issued by Exxon (in such capacity, the “Fuel Card
Provider”). As of the Petition Date, the Debtors maintain 112 Fuel Cards. Each Fuel Card is
‘tagged’ to a particular vehicle. Employees must be authorized to use the Fuel Cards. As of the
Petition Date, 187 employees are authorized to use the Fuel Cards. Payments on account of the
Fuel Cards are disbursed from the MPO Operating Account. The Debtors estimate they incur
liabilities of approximately $20,000 per month on account of the Fuel Cards and that
approximately $18,000 in prepetition amounts is payable on account of the Fuel Cards.
G. The Debtors’ Existing Business Forms
23. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors use a variety of
correspondence and business forms, including, among other things, checks, purchase orders,
invoices, and letterhead (collectively, the “Business Forms”). To minimize expenses, the
Debtors seek authority to continue using all Business Forms substantially in the forms used
immediately prior to the commencement of these chapter 11 cases, without reference to the
Debtors’ status as debtors in possession. The Debtors have prepared communications for the
various parties with which they conduct business, which will, among other things, notify such
parties of the commencement of these chapter 11 cases. The Debtors believe that these
communications will provide adequate notice of the Debtors’ status as debtors in possession.
Nevertheless, the Debtors will use reasonable efforts to have electronic checks include the legend
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 12 of 56
13
referring to the Debtors as “Debtors In Possession” as soon as practicable, and if the Debtors
generate new paper checks during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases, such checks shall
include a legend referring to the Debtors as “Debtors In Possession.”
Continuation of the Cash Management System Is in the Best Interests of the Debtors and All Other Parties in Interest
24. The efficient and economical operation of the Debtors’ businesses requires
that the Cash Management System continue during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases. As a
practical matter, it would be difficult and expensive to establish and maintain a separate cash
management system for each Debtor. Further, requiring the Debtors to adopt new, segmented
cash management systems at this early and critical stage of these cases would be expensive,
create unnecessary administrative burdens, and be extraordinarily disruptive to their business
operations. Any such disruption would have a severe and adverse impact upon the Debtors’
reorganization efforts. Accordingly, the Debtors seek authority to continue using the Cash
Management System in the same manner as the Cash Management System was utilized prior to
the Petition Date and to implement ordinary-course changes to it consistent with past practice.
The Bankruptcy Code provides for such relief.
25. Section 363(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizes the debtor in
possession to “use property of the estate in the ordinary course of business without notice or a
hearing.” The purpose of section 363(c)(1) is to provide a debtor in possession with the
flexibility to engage in the ordinary transactions required to operate its business without
unneeded oversight by its creditors or the court. See In re HLC Properties, Inc., 55 B.R. 685,
686 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1985) (finding “no need to further burden the docket or the staff of the
Court with a superfluous order” when a transaction is in the ordinary course of business); Med.
Malpractice Ins. Ass’n v. Hirsch (In re Lavigne), 114 F.3d 379, 384 (2d Cir. 1997); Chaney v.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 13 of 56
14
Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Crystal Apparel, Inc. (In re Crystal Apparel, Inc.),
207 B.R. 406, 409 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). Included within the purview of section 363(c) is a debtor’s
ability to continue the “routine transactions” necessitated by a debtor’s cash management system.
Amdura Nat’l Distrib. Co. v. Amdura Corp. (In re Amdura Corp.), 75 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir.
1996). A cash management system allows a debtor “to administer more efficiently and
effectively its financial operations and assets.” In re Southmark Corp., 49 F.3d 1111, 1114 (5th
Cir. 1995). Accordingly, 363(c)(1) authorizes continuation of the Cash Management System as
it operated prepetition without this court’s approval.
26. Even if continuation of the Cash Management System and other relief
requested herein were outside of the ordinary course of business, the Court may grant such relief
pursuant to section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
provides, in relevant part, that “[t]he [debtor], after notice and a hearing, may use, sell, or lease,
other than in the ordinary course of business, property of the estate . . . .” 11 U.S.C. § 363(b)(1).
Under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, a court may authorize a debtor to pay certain
prepetition claims where a sound business purposes exists for doing so. See In re BNP
Petroleum Corp., 642 F. App’x. 429, 435 (5th Cir. 2016); In re Cont'l Air Lines, Inc., 780 F.2d
1223, 1226 (5th Cir. 1986). In applying the business judgment rule, “courts are adjured to defer
to the debtor in possession or trustee; if a valid business reason is shown for a transaction, the
transaction is to be presumed appropriate.” In re Pilgrim's Pride Corp., 401 B.R. 229, 237
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2009).
27. The Court may also rely on its equitable powers to grant the relief
requested in this Motion. Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code empowers the Court to “issue
any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 14 of 56
15
title.” 11 U.S.C. § 105(a). Accordingly, the Court may authorize the continuation of the Cash
Management System because such relief is necessary for the Debtors to carry out their fiduciary
duties under sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to sections 1107(a)
and 1108, debtors in possession are fiduciaries holding the bankruptcy estate and operating the
business for the benefit of their economic stakeholders. See In re CoServ, L.L.C., 273 B.R. 487,
497 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2002). Consistent with such fiduciary duties, courts have authorized
payment of prepetition obligations where a sound business purpose justifies the payment of such
claims.
28. Courts in this district have approved postpetition continuation of debtors’
prepetition cash management systems as a routine matter in similar cases. See, e.g., In re Ultra
Petroleum Corp., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-32202 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 3, 2016), (ECF No.
382); In re Midstates Petroleum Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-32237 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 2,
2016), (ECF No. 65); In re Sherwin Alumina Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-20012 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Jan. 13, 2016), (ECF No. 79); In re RAAM Global Energy Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 15-35615
(MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2015), (ECF No. 126). The same relief is appropriate here.
Accordingly, the Court should authorize the Debtors to continue the Cash Management System.
Continued Performance of Intercompany Transactions Is Warranted, and Intercompany Claims Should Be Granted Administrative Expense Status
29. As stated above, under section 363(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor
in possession “may enter into transactions, including the sale or lease of property of the estate, in
the ordinary course of business . . . and may use property of the estate in the ordinary course of
business without notice or a hearing.” Further, under section 503(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy
Code, “[a]fter notice and a hearing, there shall be allowed, administrative expenses . . . including
the actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate . . . .”
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 15 of 56
16
30. The Debtors believe that they do not require the Court’s approval to
continue entering into and performing under their intercompany transactions. The Debtors enter
into and perform under intercompany transactions “in the ordinary course of business” within the
meaning of section 363(c)(1). Intercompany transactions are not just a matter of routine in the
Debtors’ business: they are the sorts of transactions that are common among many business
enterprises that operate through multiple affiliates. It is precisely because of their routine nature
that the intercompany transactions are integral to the Debtors’ ability to operate their business
and successfully emerge from these chapter 11 cases. Accordingly, out of an abundance of
caution, the Debtors request express authority to engage in such transactions postpetition.
31. The Debtors also request that the Court grant administrative expense status
to all intercompany claims against a Debtor by another Debtor or non-Debtor affiliate that arise
postpetition as a result of an intercompany transaction; provided, however, that nothing herein
shall authorize the payment by any of the Debtors of prepetition or postpetition obligations owed
by any of the Debtors inconsistent with the Debtors’ past practices. If intercompany claims are
accorded such status, each entity using funds that flow through the Cash Management System
will continue to bear the ultimate responsibility for its ordinary-course transactions with
affiliates.
32. Courts in this district have granted administrative expense status to
postpetition intercompany claims in similar cases. See, e.g., In re Ultra Petroleum Corp., Ch. 11
Case No. 16-32202 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 3, 2016), (ECF No. 382); In re Energy XXI,
LTD, Ch. 11 Case No. 16-31928 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2016), (ECF No. 881); In re
Sherwin Alumina Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-20012 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2016), (ECF
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 16 of 56
17
No. 79); In re RAAM Global Energy Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 15-35615 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Nov. 18, 2015), (ECF No. 126). For the reasons set forth above, similar relief is warranted here.
The Court Should Authorize the Debtors to Maintain Their Corporate Payment Cards and to Pay All Obligations Related Thereto
33. As stated above, under section 363(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor
in possession “may enter into transactions, including the sale or lease of property of the estate, in
the ordinary course of business . . . and may use property of the estate in the ordinary course of
business without notice or a hearing.” Furthermore, section 364(a) of the Bankruptcy Code
permits a debtor in possession to “obtain unsecured credit and incur unsecured credit in the
ordinary course of business” without a court order. Purchases made using the Corporate
Payment Cards fall within the ordinary course of business under section 363(c)(1). The use of
corporate credit cards and similar payment methods is widespread at companies across the
United States as a means of facilitating day-to-day business activities. As a result, the Debtors
believe that they do not require the Court’s approval to continue using the Corporate Payment
Cards.
34. The Debtors request authority to continuing using the Corporate Payment
Cards in the ordinary course of business, and to pay all obligations (including outstanding
prepetition obligations in the amount of $28,000) related thereto. Yet, in the event the Court
finds that such transactions do not fall within the ordinary course of business, the Debtors request
authority pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.
35. Continued use of the Corporate Payment Cards is integral to the success
and stability of the Debtors’ business. The Debtors’ business operations span the southern and
western United States, including offshore southern California. As a result, Debtors rely on the
ability of their employees to pay for travel expenses and to make other reasonable work-related
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 17 of 56
18
purchases necessary to fulfill their day-to-day professional obligations. Permitting the Debtors
to continue using the Corporate Payment Cards will ensure that the Debtors’ employees are able
to fulfill their daily professional obligations and, in turn, prevent significant disruption to the
Debtors’ business operations.
36. Courts in this district have permitted debtors to continue using their
existing corporate credit cards and similar purchasing programs. See, e.g., In re CJ Holding Co.,
Ch. 11 Case No. 16-33590 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. July 7, 2016), (ECF No. 66); In re Ultra
Petroleum Corp., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-32202 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 3, 2016), (ECF No.
292). The same relief is appropriate here. Accordingly, the Court should authorize the Debtors
to continue using the Corporate Payment Cards and to pay all obligations, including prepetition
obligations, related thereto.
The Court Should Authorize the Debtors to Pay Prepetition Bank Fees
37. The Court should authorize the Debtors to pay Bank Fees and similar
service charges incurred prior to the commencement of these chapter 11 cases. As the CoServ
court stated, “it is only logical that the bankruptcy court be able to use § 105(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code to authorize satisfaction of the prepetition claim in aid of preservation or
enhancement of the estate.” CoServ, 273 B.R. at 497.
38. Here, payment of the prepetition Bank Fees is in the best interests of the
Debtors and all parties in interest in these cases because it will prevent any disruption to the Cash
Management System. Further, because Wells Fargo likely has setoff rights for the Bank Fees,
payment of prepetition Bank Fees should not alter the rights of unsecured creditors in these
chapter 11 cases. Accordingly, the court should authorize the Debtors to pay any outstanding
prepetition Bank Fees and similar service charges to maintain the Cash Management System.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 18 of 56
19
Maintenance of the Debtors’ Existing Bank Accounts and Business Forms Is Warranted
39. The Debtors request that the Court waive the requirements of the UST
Operating Guidelines, which would require, among other things, the closure of the Bank
Accounts, the opening of new deposit accounts, and the immediate ordering of new business
forms with a legend identifying each of the Debtors as “Debtor in Possession.” These chapter 11
cases will be more orderly if the Debtors are permitted to maintain all Bank Accounts with the
same account numbers during these cases. By preserving business continuity and avoiding the
disruption and delay to the Debtors’ disbursement obligations, all parties in interest, including
employees, vendors, and customers, will be best served by the relief requested herein. In
addition, to the extent necessary, the Debtors request authority to make ordinary-course changes
to the Cash Management System, such as opening or closing their accounts in accordance with
the Debtors’ prepetition practices.
40. To minimize expenses, the Debtors further request authority to continue to
use their Business Forms substantially in the forms existing immediately prior to the
commencement of these chapter 11 cases, without reference to their status as debtors in
possession. The Debtors will use reasonable efforts to have electronic checks include the legend
referring to the Debtors as “Debtors in Possession” as soon as practicable, and if the Debtors
generate new checks during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases, such checks shall include a
legend referring to the Debtors as “Debtors In Possession.” Because parties doing business with
the Debtors undoubtedly will be aware of the Debtors’ status as debtors in possession as a result
of the publicized nature of these chapter 11 cases and the notice of commencement that the
Debtors will distribute to parties in interest, changing the Business Forms, except as noted above,
would be unnecessary and unduly burdensome.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 19 of 56
20
41. Courts in this district and in other districts have granted debtors similar
relief in numerous other complex chapter 11 cases. See, e.g., In re Ultra Petroleum Corp., Ch.
11 Case No. 16-32202 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 3, 2016), (ECF No. 382); In re Midstates
Petroleum Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-32237 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 2, 2016), (ECF No. 65);
In re Energy XXI, LTD, Ch. 11 Case No. 16-31928 (DRJ), (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2016),
(ECF No. 881); In re Sherwin Alumina Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-20012 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Jan. 13, 2016), (ECF No. 79). The same relief is also appropriate here.
Cause Exists to Extend the Time to Comply with Section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
42. Section 345 of the Bankruptcy Code governs a debtor’s cash deposits
during a chapter 11 case and authorizes deposits of money as “will yield the maximum
reasonable net return on such money, taking into account the safety of such deposit or
investment.” For deposits that are not “insured or guaranteed by the United States or by a
department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or backed by the full faith and credit
of the United States,” section 345(b) requires the debtor to obtain from the entity with which the
money is deposited a bond in favor of the United States and secured by the undertaking of an
adequate corporate surety, unless the Court for cause orders otherwise. Alternatively, the debtor
may require the entity to deposit governmental securities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 9303. Section
9303 provides that when a person is required by law to give a surety bond, that person, in lieu of
a surety bond, may instead provide an eligible obligation, designated by the Secretary of the
Treasury, as an acceptable substitute for a surety bond.
43. Investment of cash in strict compliance with the requirements of section
345(b) would, in large chapter 11 cases such as these, be inconsistent with section 345(a), which
permits a debtor in possession to make such investments of money of the estate “as will yield the
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 20 of 56
21
maximum reasonable net return on such money.” Thus, in 1994, to avoid “needlessly
handcuff[ing] larger, more sophisticated debtors,” Congress amended section 345(b) to provide
that its strict investment requirements may be waived or modified if the Court so orders “for
cause.” 140 Cong. Rec. H 10,767 (Oct. 4, 1994), 1994 WL 545773.
44. As stated above, all of the Debtors’ active Bank Accounts are maintained
with Wells Fargo, a bank that has been approved by the U.S. Trustee as an Authorized
Depository under the UST Operating Guidelines. Consequently, if funds in any of the Bank
Accounts exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Debtors
propose to engage in discussions with the U.S. Trustee to determine what modifications to those
Bank Accounts, if any, are necessary under the circumstances.
45. To enable such discussions, if they become necessary, the Debtors request
a 45-day extension (or such additional time to which the U.S. Trustee may agree or as the Court
may approve) of the time in which to either comply with section 345(b), make alternative
acceptable arrangements, or to seek a waiver of section 345(b), subject to the Court’s approval.
See In re Serv. Merchandise Co., Inc., 240 B.R. 894, 896 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1999) (noting that
one of the factors to consider in determining whether cause exists “for relief from the strictures
of § 345(b)” is whether benefits to the debtors outweigh the harm, if any, to the estate).
46. Courts in this district have previously granted similar relief in other
complex chapter 11 cases. See, e.g., In re Ultra Petroleum Corp., Ch. 11 Case No. 16-32202
(MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 3, 2016), (ECF No. 382); In re Energy XXI, LTD, Ch. 11 Case No.
16-31928 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2016), (ECF No. 881); In re Sherwin Alumina Co.,
Ch. 11 Case No. 16-20012 (DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2016), (ECF No. 79); In re RAAM
Global Energy Co., Ch. 11 Case No. 15-35615 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2015), (ECF No.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 21 of 56
22
126). Accordingly, the Debtors request the 45-day extension set forth above (or such additional
term) to comply with section 345(b), make other acceptable arrangements, or seek a waiver of
345(b), subject to this Court’s approval.
Request for Waiver of Rule 7(B) of the Complex Chapter 11 Guidelines
47. The Procedures for Complex Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases for the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Complex Case Procedures”)
require, among other things, that debtors who own or operate oil, gas, or mineral leases maintain
a segregated account for funds received after the petition date that are attributable to overriding
royalties, working interest owners, and third parties (the “Royalty Payments”).
48. The Debtors have requested that the funds attributable to the Royalty
Payments be paid by the Debtors postpetition in the ordinary course of business pursuant to the
Emergency Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) and 363(b) for Interim and Final
Orders (I) Authorizing Debtors to Pay Joint Interest Billings, Interest Owner Payments, and
E&P Operating Expenses in the Ordinary Course, and (II) Authorizing Financial Institutions to
Honor and Process Checks and Transfers Related to Such Obligations (the “E&P/JIB
Motion”). The Debtors’ existing practice with respect to Royalty Payments that are due and
owing but are otherwise unpayable is to designate such payments in their operating accounts as
amounts to be held in suspense. As more fully described in the E&P/JIB Motion, the Debtors
hold Royalty Payments in “suspense” when (i) they are too small to warrant payment under the
terms of the applicable operating agreement or other applicable operating instruments, (ii) the
Debtors have determined they should not be paid because of a dispute or for other legal reasons,
or (iii) the Debtors are unable to identify or properly pay the relevant interest owner.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 22 of 56
23
49. Requiring the Debtors to implement new procedures for the segregation of
all Royalty Payments at this early and critical stage would be expensive, impose needless
administrative burdens, and cause undue disruption to the Debtors and their estates. Any such
disruption would adversely, and perhaps irreparably, impact the Debtors’ ability to reorganize
and maximize value of their estates for the benefit of the Debtors’ creditors and other parties in
interest. Moreover, such a disruption would be wholly unnecessary because the Debtors’
existing practice with respect to the Royalty Payments already allows the Debtors to hold and
disburse, in the ordinary course of business, (a) funds that are attributable to overriding royalties,
working interest owners, or third parties, including amounts in suspense and (b) amounts
received prepetition that are held in suspense. Accordingly, maintaining the existing Cash
Management System without disruption is both essential to the Debtors’ ongoing operations and
in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, and all interested parties.
50. Courts in this district have recently granted such relief to similarly situated
debtors in other complex chapter 11 cases. See, e.g., In re Stone Energy Corp., Ch. 11 Case No.
16-36390 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016), (ECF No. 75) (waiving the requirements of
Rule 7(b) of the Complex Case Procedures); In re Linn Energy, LLC, Ch. 11 Case No. 16-60040
(DRJ) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 5, 2016), (ECF No. 731) (same). The same relief is appropriate
here.
Bankruptcy Rule 6003 Has Been Satisfied
51. Bankruptcy Rule 6003 provides that, to the extent relief is necessary to
avoid immediate and irreparable harm, a bankruptcy court may issue an order granting “a motion
to use, sell, lease, or otherwise incur an obligation regarding property of the estate, including a
motion to pay all or part of a claim that arose before the filing of the petition” before 21 days
after filing of the petition. Here, the ability to use the Cash Management System and obtain the
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 23 of 56
24
other relief requested herein is necessary to avoid the immediate and irreparable harm that would
otherwise result from any interruption of the flow of funds through the enterprise. Indeed, the
failure to receive the requested relief during the first 21 days of the chapter 11 cases would
severely disrupt the Debtors’ operations and significantly impact the Debtors’ ability to
reorganize swiftly and efficiently. Accordingly, the Debtors have satisfied the requirements of
Bankruptcy Rule 6003.
Request for Bankruptcy Rule 6004 Waivers
52. The Debtors request a waiver of the notice requirements under Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(a) and any stay of the order granting the relief requested herein pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h). As explained above and in the Stillwell Declaration, the relief
requested herein is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtors.
Accordingly, ample cause exists to justify waiver of the notice requirements under Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(a) and the 14-day stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), to the extent such stay
applies.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 24 of 56
25
Reservation of Rights
53. Nothing contained herein is intended to be or shall be construed as (i) an
admission as to the validity of any claim against the Debtors, (ii) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any
party in interest’s rights to dispute any claim, (iii) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any other party in
interest’s rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law, or (iv) an approval or
assumption of any agreement, contract, program, policy, or lease under section 365 of the
Bankruptcy Code. Likewise, if the Court grants the relief sought herein, any payment made
pursuant to the Court’s order is not intended to be and should not be construed as an admission to
the validity of any claim or a waiver of the Debtors’ or any party in interest’s rights to dispute
such claim subsequently.
Notice
54. No trustee, examiner, or statutory committee of creditors has been
appointed in these chapter 11 cases. Notice of this Motion has been provided to (i) the Office of
the United States Trustee for Region 7; (ii) the Debtors’ 30 largest unsecured creditors on a
consolidated basis; (iii) Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (the
“Prepetition Agent”) under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2011, as
amended; (iv) Linklaters LLP, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105
(Attn: Margot Schonholtz, Esq. and Penelope Jensen, Esq.) as counsel to the Prepetition Agent;
(v) Vinson & Elkins LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700, Dallas, TX 75201 (Attn: Paul Heath,
Esq. and Bradley Foxman, Esq.) as counsel to the Prepetition Agent; (vi) Davis Polk &
Wardwell LLP, 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (Attn: Brian Resnick, Esq. and
Angela Libby, Esq.) as counsel to the ad hoc group of unsecured noteholders; (vii) Wilmington
Trust, National Association, as successor trustee under (a) that certain Indenture, dated as of
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 25 of 56
26
April 17, 2013, for the issuance of 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2021, as amended and
supplemented, and (b) that certain Indenture, dated as of July 17, 2014, for the issuance of 6
7/8% Senior Notes due 2022, as amended and supplemented; (viii) Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
LLP, 180 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038 (Attn: Erez E. Gilad, Esq.) as counsel to
Wilmington Trust, National Association; (ix) the Securities and Exchange Commission; (x) the
Internal Revenue Service; (xi) the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of
Texas; and (xii) those persons who have formally appeared in these chapter 11 cases and
requested service pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002.
55. In addition to the foregoing, notice of this Motion and any order entered
hereon will be served on all parties required by Local Rule 9013-1(d) (collectively with the
parties listed in the preceding paragraph, the “Notice Parties”). Based on the urgency of the
circumstances surrounding this Motion and the nature of the relief requested herein, the Debtors
respectfully submit that no further notice is required.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 26 of 56
27
WHEREFORE the Debtors respectfully request entry of the Proposed Interim
Order and Proposed Final Order granting the relief requested herein and such other and further
relief as the Court may deem just and appropriate
Dated: January 16, 2017 Houston, Texas
/s/ Alfredo R. Pérez WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Alfredo R. Pérez (15776275) 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1700 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 546-5000 Facsimile: (713) 224-9511 -and- WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Gary T. Holtzer (pro hac vice pending) Joseph H. Smolinsky (pro hac vice pending) 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007
Proposed Attorneys for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 27 of 56
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by the Electronic Case Filing System for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, and will be served as set forth in the Affidavit of Service to be filed by the Debtors’ proposed claims, noticing, and solicitation agent.
/s/ Alfredo R. Pérez WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Alfredo R. Pérez (15776275) 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1700 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 546-5000 Facsimile: (713) 224-9511
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 28 of 56
Exhibit A
Proposed Interim Order
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 29 of 56
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
§ In re: § Chapter 11 § MEMORIAL PRODUCTION § Case No. 17-______ (___) PARTNERS LP, et al., § § (Jointly Administered) Debtors.1 § § Re: Docket No. ___
INTERIM ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a), 345(b), 363(b)(1), 363(c)(1),
AND 364(a) AND FED. R. BANKR. P. 6003 AND 6004 (I) AUTHORIZING DEBTORS TO (A) CONTINUE EXISTING CASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, (B) MAINTAIN BUSINESS FORMS AND EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS, (C) CONTINUE INTERCOMPANY
ARRANGEMENTS, AND (D) CONTINUE USING CORPORATE PAYMENT CARDS; (II) EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLY WITH, OR SEEK WAIVER OF, THE REQUIREMENTS OF 11 U.S.C. § 345(b); (III) WAIVING
THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 7B OF THE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLEX CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASES; AND (IV) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
Upon the motion, dated January 16, 2017 (the “Motion”),2 of Memorial
Production Partners LP (“MEMP”) and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession
(collectively, the “Debtors”), for (i) interim and final authority to (a) continue their existing cash
management system; (b) continue using their existing Business Forms and Bank Accounts;
(c) continue their intercompany arrangements; and (d) continue using their Corporate Payment
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are: Memorial Production Partners LP (6667); Memorial Production Partners GP LLC; MEMP Services LLC (1887); Memorial Production Operating LLC; Memorial Production Finance Corporation (3356); WHT Energy Partners LLC; WHT Carthage LLC; Memorial Midstream LLC; Beta Operating Company, LLC; Columbus Energy, LLC; Rise Energy Operating, LLC; Rise Energy Minerals, LLC; Rise Energy Beta, LLC; San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); and Memorial Energy Services LLC. The Debtors’ mailing address is 500 Dallas Street, Suite 1600, Houston, Texas 77002.
2 All capitalized terms, used but not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 30 of 56
2
Cards, each in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices; (ii) extension of time to
comply with, or to seek a waiver of, the requirements of section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code;
(iii) a waiver of Rule 7B of the Complex Chapter 11 Guidelines; and (iv) related relief, each as
more fully set forth in the Motion; and upon consideration of the Stillwell Declaration; and the
Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief requested therein pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the Order of Reference to Bankruptcy Judges, General Order 2012-
6 (S.D. Tex. May 24, 2012) (Hinojosa, C.J.); and consideration of the Motion and the requested
relief being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper before this
Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and due and proper notice of the Motion having
been provided to the Notice Parties, and it appearing that no other or further notice need be
provided; and the Court having reviewed the Motion; and the Court having held a hearing on the
Motion on _____________________, 2017; and the Court having determined that the legal and
factual bases set forth in the Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and it
appearing that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the Debtors and their
respective estates and creditors; and the Court having found and determined that the relief sought
in the Motion is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtors and their
estates as contemplated by Bankruptcy Rule 6003; and upon all of the proceedings had before
the Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion is granted on an interim basis as provided herein.
2. Pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Debtors are authorized to continue to manage their cash pursuant to the Cash Management
System maintained by the Debtors before the Petition Date and to collect and disburse cash in
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 31 of 56
3
accordance with the Cash Management System, including intercompany funding to Debtor and
non-Debtor affiliates.
3. The Debtors and Wells Fargo or any other bank or financial institution
may, without further order of this Court, agree to and implement changes to the Cash
Management System and procedures in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past
practices.
4. Pursuant to section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, Wells Fargo and other
banks and financial institutions are authorized to continue to honor transfers, as directed by the
Debtors, of funds among the Bank Accounts and to the Debtors and their non-Debtor affiliates.
5. The Debtors are authorized, in the ordinary course, to continue to honor
prepetition and postpetition intercompany obligations to subsidiaries and affiliates (Debtor and
non-Debtor) in accordance with their prepetition practices. Intercompany claims against a
Debtor by another Debtor or non-Debtor affiliate that arise postpetition as a result of an
intercompany transaction are granted administrative expense status.
6. The Debtors shall maintain accurate records of all transfers within the
Cash Management System so that all postpetition transfers and transactions shall be adequately
and promptly documented in, and readily ascertainable from, their books and records, to the
same extent maintained by the Debtors before the Petition Date. Upon the request of the
Prepetition Agent with reasonable advance notice, the Debtors shall permit the Prepetition Agent
to inspect their records with respect to such postpetition transfers and transactions.
7. The Debtors are authorized to: (i) designate, maintain, and continue to use
any or all of their existing Bank Accounts listed on Schedule 1 annexed hereto (which shall be
promptly amended to identify any Bank Accounts inadvertently omitted therefrom, with any
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 32 of 56
4
such amendments being served on the U.S. Trustee, the Prepetition Agent, and any statutory
committee appointed in these chapter 11 cases), in the names and with the account numbers
existing immediately before the Petition Date, (ii) deposit funds in and withdraw funds from
such accounts by all usual means, including, without limitation, checks, wire transfers,
automated clearinghouse transfers, and other debits, (iii) pay any Bank Fees or other service
charges associated with the Bank Accounts or the Corporate Payment Cards, whether arising
before or after the Petition Date, and (iv) treat their Bank Accounts for all purposes as debtors in
possession accounts.
8. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, Wells Fargo and other
applicable banks or other applicable financial institutions are authorized and directed to continue
to maintain, service, and administer the Bank Accounts without interruption and in the usual and
ordinary course, and to receive, process, honor, and pay all checks, drafts, wires, or other
transfers by the holders or makers thereof, as the case may be, to the extent that Debtors have
sufficient funds standing to their credit with such bank or financial institution; provided, that
nothing contained herein shall (i) require Wells Fargo or any other applicable bank or applicable
financial institution to honor any check, ACH transfer, draft wire, or other transfer unless the
account has good and collected funds at the time of the requested action or (ii) authorize Wells
Fargo or any other bank or financial institution to honor any check, ACH transfer, draft, wire, or
other transfer issued or dated before the Petition Date, except as otherwise provided herein or by
other order of this Court. Wells Fargo and any other banks or financial institutions are
authorized to rely upon and accept and honor all representations and instructions from the
Debtors as to which check, ACH transfer, draft, wire, or other transfer drawn or issued by the
Debtors before the Petition Date should be honored pursuant to an order of this Court, and such
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 33 of 56
5
financial institutions shall not have any liability to any party for (a) relying on this Interim Order
or the representations or instructions by the Debtors as provided for herein or any other order of
this court or (b) honoring or not honoring any check, ACH transfer, draft, wire, or other transfer
in a good-faith belief that the Court has or has not authorized the honoring of such check, ACH
transfer, draft, wire, or other such transfer.
9. Wells Fargo and any other banks or financial institutions are authorized to
debit the Debtors’ accounts in the ordinary course of business without the need for further order
of this Court for: (i) all checks drawn on the Debtors’ accounts which are cashed or exchanged
for cashier’s checks by the payees thereof prior to the Petition Date; (ii) all checks or other items
deposited in one of the Debtors’ accounts prior to the Petition Date which have been dishonored
or returned unpaid for any reason, together with any fees and costs in connection therewith, to
the same extent the Debtors were responsible for such items prior to the Petition Date; and
(iii) all amounts outstanding as of the date hereof, if any, owed to Wells Fargo or any other bank
or financial institution as service charges for the maintenance of the Cash Management System,
including, without limitation, any Bank Fees or other service charges associated with the Bank
Accounts or the Corporate Payment Cards, whether arising before or after the Petition Date.
10. Those certain existing deposit agreements and Corporate Payment Card
agreements between the Debtors, on the one hand, and Wells Fargo or any other bank or
financial institution, on the other hand, shall continue to govern the postpetition cash
management relationship between such parties, and all of the provisions of such agreements,
including, without limitation, the termination and fee provisions, shall remain in full force and
effect.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 34 of 56
6
11. The Debtors are authorized pursuant to 363(b) and 105(a) to continue
using their Corporate Payment Cards in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices,
and to pay all obligations (including prepetition obligations) related thereto; provided, however,
the Debtors’ use of the Corporate Credit Cards is subject to the terms expressed in paragraphs 12
and 13 below.
12. The Debtors are authorized to continue using the Corporate Credit Cards
in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices pursuant to the WellsOne Commercial
Card Agreement, dated on or around July 6, 2016 (as amended, restated, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time to time, the “Card Agreement”), between Wells Fargo (in such
capacity, the “Credit Card Provider”) and MPO subject to the terms and conditions thereof.
The Debtors’ obligations to the Credit Card Provider are secured by certain collateral (the
“Collateral”) in the MPO Cash Collateral Account pursuant to that certain Security Agreement:
Immediately Restricted Wells Fargo Bank, National Association Deposit Account, dated as of
January 13, 2017 (the “Security Agreement”), between the Credit Card Provider and MPO. In
accordance with the Security Agreement, the Credit Card Provider has and shall continue to have
a valid and perfected, non-avoidable first-priority lien on such Collateral and any proceeds
thereof. Such lien shall not be primed by any lien granted to any post-petition lender or other
person without the consent of the Credit Card Provider.
13. With respect to the Debtors’ use of Corporate Credit Cards, the Credit
Card Provider is authorized to make advances from time to time to MPO with a maximum
exposure at any time up to $150,000.00. The Debtors shall prepay all ACH transfers related to
the Corporate Credit Cards at least two (2) business days in advance of such transfer. The
Debtors are authorized and directed to pay all obligations, charges, and fees, including
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 35 of 56
7
prepetition obligations, charges, and fees, related to the Corporate Credit Cards. The Credit Card
Provider may rely on the representations of the Debtors with respect to its use of the Corporate
Credit Cards pursuant to the Card Agreement, and the Credit Card Provider shall not have any
liability to any party for relying on such representations by the Debtors as provided for herein.
14. The Debtors’ time to comply with section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
is hereby extended for a period of 45 days from the date of this Order (the “Extension Period”);
provided, however, that such extension is without prejudice to the Debtors’ right to request a
further extension of the Extension Period or to seek a waiver of the section 345(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code in these cases.
15. The requirements of Rule 7(B) of the Complex Case Procedures are
hereby waived, and the Debtors are not required to establish separate accounts for cash collateral,
tax payments, or funds attributable to overriding royalties, working interest owners, and third
parties.
16. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Debtors from opening any
additional deposit accounts, or closing any Bank Accounts, in the ordinary course, as they may
deem necessary and appropriate in consultation with the Prepetition Agent, and Wells Fargo and
other banks and financial institutions are authorized to honor the Debtors’ request to open or
close, as the case may be, Bank Accounts or additional bank accounts; provided, that any new
deposit account shall be with (i) a bank that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, organized under the laws of the United States, and designated as an Authorized
Depository under the UST Operating Guidelines or (ii) any other bank, as the Debtors may
determine, upon prior notice to the U.S. Trustee, the Prepetition Agent, and any statutory
committee appointed in these chapter 11 cases; provided, further, that all accounts opened by any
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 36 of 56
8
of the Debtors on or after the Petition Date at any bank shall, for purposes of this Order, be
deemed a Bank Account as if it had been listed on Schedule 1 hereto.
17. The Debtors are authorized to use their existing Business Forms and are
not required to (i) obtain new stock reflecting their status as debtors in possession, or (ii) print
“debtor in possession,” the Debtors’ chapter 11 case numbers, or other information on any of
their checks or wire transfers; provided, that the Debtors will use reasonable efforts to have
electronic checks include the legend referring to the Debtors as “Debtors in Possession” as soon
as practicable; provided, further, that if the Debtors generate new checks during the pendency of
these chapter 11 cases, such checks shall include a legend referring to the Debtors as “Debtors in
Possession.”
18. To the extent a bank or other financial institution in the ordinary course of
the Cash Management System incurs an overdraft or other event giving rise to an uncovered
debit, regardless of whether arising prepetition or postpetition, the financial institution shall be
authorized to cover the overdraft or debit from funds of the Debtors in its possession and
available for that purpose in accordance with current practice and any applicable agreement
governing the Bank Accounts.
19. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, to pay prepetition amounts
outstanding as of the Petition Date, if any, owed to the financial institutions and other third
parties that directly or indirectly provide services to the Debtors in connection with the Cash
Management System as Bank Fees and other service charges for the maintenance of the Cash
Management System.
20. The Debtors are further authorized to issue postpetition checks, or to effect
postpetition fund transfer requests, in replacement of any checks or fund transfer requests that
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 37 of 56
9
are dishonored as a consequence of these chapter 11 cases with respect to any prepetition
amounts that are authorized to be paid pursuant to this Order.
21. Nothing contained in the Motion or this Order or any payment made
pursuant to the authority granted by this Order is intended to be or shall be construed as (i) an
admission as to the validity of any claim against the Debtors, (ii) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any
appropriate party in interest’s rights to dispute any claim, (iii) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any
other party in interest’s rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law, or (iv) an
approval or assumption of any agreement, contract, program, policy, or lease under section 365
of the Bankruptcy Code.
22. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any payment
to be made, or authorization contained hereunder, shall be subject to the same limitations and
restrictions as are provided for in any interim or final order (the “Cash Collateral Orders”)
entered pursuant to the Debtors’ Emergency Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105,
361, 362, 363 and 507, Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 4001, 6003, 6004, and 9014 and Bankruptcy
Local Rule 4001-1, inter alia, (I) Authorizing Debtors’ Limited Use of Cash Collateral,
(II) Granting Adequate Protection to the Prepetition Secured Parties, (III) Modifying the
Automatic Stay, and (IV) Scheduling a Final Hearing. To the extent there is any conflict
between this Order and the Cash Collateral Orders, the terms of the Cash Collateral Orders shall
control.
23. The requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6003(b) have been satisfied.
24. Notice of the Motion as provided herein shall be deemed good and
sufficient notice of such Motion and the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) are waived.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 38 of 56
10
25. Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), this Order
shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.
26. This Order is effective only from the date of entry through this Court’s
disposition of the Motion on a final basis; provided, that the Court’s ultimate disposition of the
Motion on a final basis shall not impair or otherwise affect any action taken pursuant to this
Order.
27. The Debtors are authorized to take all steps necessary or appropriate to
carry out this Order.
28. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters
arising from or related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order.
29. A final hearing to consider the relief requested in the Motion shall be held
on , ____ at ______ (Central Time) and any objections or
responses to the Motion shall be filed and served so as to be actually received on or prior to
, ____ at 4:00 p.m. (Central Time).
Dated: , 2017 Houston, Texas
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 39 of 56
Schedule 1
Bank Accounts
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 40 of 56
Bank Debtor Account Number (last four digits)
Account Name
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
3030 MPO Operating Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
2164 MPO A/P Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
2179 MPO Royalty Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
0132 MPO Cash Collateral
Account Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. Beta Operating Company,
LLC 1869 Beta Main Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Beta Operating Company, LLC
0759 Beta A/P Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company
4044 San Pedro Main Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company
0767 San Pedro A/P Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
MEMP Services LLC 0902 MEMP Services Main
Account Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. MEMP Services LLC 0910
MEMP Services Payroll Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
MEMP Services LLC 1926 MEMP Services A/P
Account
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 41 of 56
Exhibit B
Proposed Final Order
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 42 of 56
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
§ In re: § Chapter 11 § MEMORIAL PRODUCTION § Case No. 17-______ (___) PARTNERS LP, et al., § § (Jointly Administered) Debtors.1 § § Re: Docket No. ___
FINAL ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a), 345(b), 363(b)(1), 363(c)(1),
AND 364(a) AND FED. R. BANKR. P. 6003 AND 6004 (I) AUTHORIZING DEBTORS TO (A) CONTINUE EXISTING CASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, (B) MAINTAIN BUSINESS FORMS AND EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS, (C) CONTINUE INTERCOMPANY
ARRANGEMENTS, AND (D) CONTINUE USING CORPORATE PAYMENT CARDS; (II) EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLY WITH, OR SEEK WAIVER OF, THE REQUIREMENTS OF 11 U.S.C. § 345(b); (III) WAIVING
THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 7B OF THE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLEX CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASES; AND (IV) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
Upon the motion, dated January 16, 2017 (the “Motion”),2 of Memorial
Production Partners LP (“MEMP”) Inc. and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in
possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), for (i) interim and final authority to (a) continue their
existing cash management system; (b) continue using their existing Business Forms and Bank
Accounts; (c) continue their intercompany arrangements; and (d) continue using their Corporate
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are: Memorial Production Partners LP (6667); Memorial Production Partners GP LLC; MEMP Services LLC (1887); Memorial Production Operating LLC; Memorial Production Finance Corporation (3356); WHT Energy Partners LLC; WHT Carthage LLC; Memorial Midstream LLC; Beta Operating Company, LLC; Columbus Energy, LLC; Rise Energy Operating, LLC; Rise Energy Minerals, LLC; Rise Energy Beta, LLC; San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); and Memorial Energy Services LLC. The Debtors’ mailing address is 500 Dallas Street, Suite 1600, Houston, Texas 77002.
2 All capitalized terms, used but not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 43 of 56
2
Payment Cards, each in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices; (ii) extension of
the time to comply with, or to seek a waiver of, the requirements of section 345(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code; (iii) a waiver of Rule 7B of the Complex Chapter 11 Guidelines; and
(iv) related relief, each as more fully set forth in the Motion; and upon consideration of the
Stillwell Declaration; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief
requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the Order of Reference to
Bankruptcy Judges, General Order 2012-6 (S.D. Tex. May 24, 2012) (Hinojosa, C.J.); and
consideration of the Motion and the requested relief being a core proceeding pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and
1409; and due and proper notice of the Motion having been provided to the Notice Parties, and it
appearing that no other or further notice need be provided; and the Court having reviewed the
Motion; and the Court having held a hearing on the Motion on ____________________, 2017
and the Court having granted interim relief on the Motion on ____________________, 2017
(Docket No. ___); and the Court having held a final hearing on the Motion on
______________________; and all objections to the Motion having been withdrawn, resolved,
or overruled; and the Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set forth in the
Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and it appearing that the relief requested
in the Motion is in the best interests of the Debtors and their respective estates and creditors; and
upon all of the proceedings had before the Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause
appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion is granted.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 44 of 56
3
2. Pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Debtors are authorized to continue to manage their cash pursuant to the Cash Management
System maintained by the Debtors before the Petition Date and to collect and disburse cash in
accordance with the Cash Management System, including intercompany funding to Debtor and
non-Debtor affiliates.
3. The Debtors and Wells Fargo or any other bank or financial institution
may, without further order of this Court, agree to and implement changes to the Cash
Management System and procedures in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past
practices.
4. Pursuant to section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, Wells Fargo and other
banks and financial institutions are authorized to continue to honor transfers, as directed by the
Debtors, of funds among the Bank Accounts and to the Debtors and their non-Debtor affiliates.
5. The Debtors are authorized, in the ordinary course, to continue to honor
prepetition and postpetition intercompany obligations to subsidiaries and affiliates (Debtor and
non-Debtor) in accordance with their prepetition practices. Intercompany claims against a
Debtor by another Debtor or non-Debtor affiliate that arise postpetition as a result of an
intercompany transaction are granted administrative expense status.
6. The Debtors shall maintain accurate records of all transfers within the
Cash Management System so that all postpetition transfers and transactions shall be adequately
and promptly documented in, and readily ascertainable from, their books and records, to the
same extent maintained by the Debtors before the Petition Date. Upon the request of the
Prepetition Agent with reasonable advance notice, the Debtors shall permit the Prepetition Agent
to inspect their records with respect to such postpetition transfers and transactions.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 45 of 56
4
7. The Debtors are authorized to: (i) designate, maintain, and continue to use
any or all of their existing Bank Accounts listed on Schedule 1 annexed hereto (which shall be
promptly amended to identify any Bank Accounts inadvertently omitted therefrom, with any
such amendments being served on the U.S. Trustee, the Prepetition Agent, and any statutory
committee appointed in these chapter 11 cases), in the names and with the account numbers
existing immediately before the Petition Date, (ii) deposit funds in and withdraw funds from
such accounts by all usual means, including, without limitation, checks, wire transfers,
automated clearinghouse transfers, and other debits, (iii) pay any Bank Fees or other service
charges associated with the Bank Accounts or the Corporate Payment Cards, whether arising
before or after the Petition Date, and (iv) treat their Bank Accounts for all purposes as debtors in
possession accounts.
8. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, Wells Fargo and other
applicable banks or other applicable financial institutions are authorized and directed to continue
to maintain, service, and administer the Bank Accounts without interruption and in the usual and
ordinary course, and to receive, process, honor, and pay all checks, drafts, wires, or other
transfers by the holders or makers thereof, as the case may be, to the extent that Debtors have
sufficient funds standing to their credit with such bank or financial institution; provided, that
nothing contained herein shall (i) require Wells Fargo or any other applicable bank or applicable
financial institution to honor any check, ACH transfer, draft wire, or other transfer unless the
account has good and collected funds at the time of the requested action or (ii) authorize Wells
Fargo or any other bank or financial institution to honor any check, ACH transfer, draft, wire, or
other transfer issued or dated before the Petition Date, except as otherwise provided herein or by
other order of this Court. Wells Fargo and any other banks or financial institutions are
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 46 of 56
5
authorized to rely upon and accept and honor all representations and instructions from the
Debtors as to which check, ACH transfer, draft, wire, or other transfer drawn or issued by the
Debtors before the Petition Date should be honored pursuant to an order of this Court, and such
financial institutions shall not have any liability to any party for (a) relying on this Final Order or
the representations or instructions by the Debtors as provided for herein or any other order of this
court or (b) honoring or not honoring any check, ACH transfer, draft, wire, or other transfer in a
good-faith belief that the Court has or has not authorized the honoring of such check, ACH
transfer, draft, wire, or other such transfer.
9. Wells Fargo and any other banks or financial institutions are authorized to
debit the Debtors’ accounts in the ordinary course of business without the need for further order
of this Court for: (i) all checks drawn on the Debtors’ accounts which are cashed or exchanged
for cashier’s checks by the payees thereof prior to the Petition Date; (ii) all checks or other items
deposited in one of the Debtors’ accounts prior to the Petition Date which have been dishonored
or returned unpaid for any reason, together with any fees and costs in connection therewith, to
the same extent the Debtors were responsible for such items prior to the Petition Date; and
(iii) all amounts outstanding as of the date hereof, if any, owed to Wells Fargo or any other bank
or financial institution as service charges for the maintenance of the Cash Management System,
including, without limitation, any Bank Fees or other service charges associated with the Bank
Accounts or the Corporate Payment Cards, whether arising before or after the Petition Date.
10. Those certain existing deposit agreements and Corporate Payment Card
agreements between the Debtors, on the one hand, and Wells Fargo or any other bank or
financial institution, on the other hand, shall continue to govern the postpetition cash
management relationship between such parties, and all of the provisions of such agreements,
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 47 of 56
6
including, without limitation, the termination and fee provisions, shall remain in full force and
effect.
11. The Debtors are authorized pursuant to 363(b) and 105(a) to continue
using their Corporate Payment Cards in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices,
and to pay all obligations (including prepetition obligations) related thereto; provided, however,
the Debtors’ use of the Corporate Credit Cards is subject to the terms expressed in paragraphs 12
and 13 below.
12. The Debtors are authorized to continue using the Corporate Credit Cards
in the ordinary course and consistent with past practices pursuant to the WellsOne Commercial
Card Agreement, dated on or around July 6, 2016 (as amended, restated, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time to time, the “Card Agreement”), between Wells Fargo (in such
capacity, the “Credit Card Provider”) and MPO subject to the terms and conditions thereof.
The Debtors’ obligations to the Credit Card Provider are secured by certain collateral (the
“Collateral”) in the MPO Cash Collateral Account pursuant to that certain Security Agreement:
Immediately Restricted Wells Fargo Bank, National Association Deposit Account, dated as of
January 13, 2017 (the “Security Agreement”), between the Credit Card Provider and MPO. In
accordance with the Security Agreement, the Credit Card Provider has and shall continue to have
a valid and perfected, non-avoidable first-priority lien on such Collateral and any proceeds
thereof. Such lien shall not be primed by any lien granted to any post-petition lender or other
person without the consent of the Credit Card Provider.
13. With respect to the Debtors’ use of Corporate Credit Cards, the Credit
Card Provider is authorized to make advances from time to time to MPO with a maximum
exposure at any time up to $150,000.00. The Debtors shall prepay all ACH transfers related to
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 48 of 56
7
the Corporate Credit Cards at least two (2) business days in advance of such transfer. The
Debtors are authorized and directed to pay all obligations, charges, and fees, including
prepetition obligations, charges, and fees, related to the Corporate Credit Cards. The Credit Card
Provider may rely on the representations of the Debtors with respect to its use of the Corporate
Credit Cards pursuant to the Card Agreement, and the Credit Card Provider shall not have any
liability to any party for relying on such representations by the Debtors as provided for herein.
14. The Debtors’ time to comply with section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
is hereby extended for a period of 45 days from the date of this Order (the “Extension Period”);
provided, however, that such extension is without prejudice to the Debtors’ right to request a
further extension of the Extension Period or to seek a waiver of the section 345(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code in these cases.
15. The requirements of Rule 7(B) of the Complex Case Procedures are
hereby waived, and the Debtors are not required to establish separate accounts for cash collateral,
tax payments, or funds attributable to overriding royalties, working interest owners, and third
parties.
16. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Debtors from opening any
additional deposit accounts, or closing any Bank Accounts, in the ordinary course, as they may
deem necessary and appropriate in consultation with the Prepetition Agent, and Wells Fargo and
other banks and financial institutions are authorized to honor the Debtors’ request to open or
close, as the case may be, Bank Accounts or additional bank accounts; provided, that any new
deposit account shall be with (i) a bank that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, organized under the laws of the United States, and designated as an Authorized
Depository under the UST Operating Guidelines or (ii) any other bank, as the Debtors may
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 49 of 56
8
determine, upon prior notice to the U.S. Trustee, the Prepetition Agent, and any statutory
committee appointed in these chapter 11 cases; provided, further, that all accounts opened by any
of the Debtors on or after the Petition Date at any bank shall, for purposes of this Order, be
deemed a Bank Account as if it had been listed on Schedule 1 hereto.
17. The Debtors are authorized to use their existing Business Forms and are
not required to (i) obtain new stock reflecting their status as debtors in possession, or (ii) print
“debtor in possession,” the Debtors’ chapter 11 case numbers, or other information on any of
their checks or wire transfers; provided, that the Debtors will use reasonable efforts to have
electronic checks include the legend referring to the Debtors as “Debtors in Possession” as soon
as practicable; provided, further, that if the Debtors generate new checks during the pendency of
these chapter 11 cases, such checks shall include a legend referring to the Debtors as “Debtors in
Possession.”
18. To the extent a bank or other financial institution in the ordinary course of
the Cash Management System incurs an overdraft or other event giving rise to an uncovered
debit, regardless of whether arising prepetition or postpetition, the financial institution shall be
authorized to cover the overdraft or debit from funds of the Debtors in its possession and
available for that purpose in accordance with current practice and any applicable agreement
governing the Bank Accounts.
19. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, to pay prepetition amounts
outstanding as of the Petition Date, if any, owed to the financial institutions and other third
parties that directly or indirectly provide services to the Debtors in connection with the Cash
Management System as Bank Fees and other service charges for the maintenance of the Cash
Management System.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 50 of 56
9
20. The Debtors are further authorized to issue postpetition checks, or to effect
postpetition fund transfer requests, in replacement of any checks or fund transfer requests that
are dishonored as a consequence of these chapter 11 cases with respect to any prepetition
amounts that are authorized to be paid pursuant to this Order.
21. Nothing contained in the Motion or this Order or any payment made
pursuant to the authority granted by this Order is intended to be or shall be construed as (i) an
admission as to the validity of any claim against the Debtors, (ii) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any
appropriate party in interest’s rights to dispute any claim, (iii) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any
other party in interest’s rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law, or (iv) an
approval or assumption of any agreement, contract, program, policy, or lease under section 365
of the Bankruptcy Code.
22. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any payment
to be made, or authorization contained hereunder, shall be subject to the same limitations and
restrictions as are provided for in any interim or final order (the “Cash Collateral Orders”)
entered pursuant to the Debtors’ Emergency Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105,
361, 362, 363 and 507, Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 4001, 6003, 6004, and 9014 and Bankruptcy
Local Rule 4001-1, inter alia, (I) Authorizing Debtors’ Limited Use of Cash Collateral,
(II) Granting Adequate Protection to the Prepetition Secured Parties, (III) Modifying the
Automatic Stay, and (IV) Scheduling a Final Hearing. To the extent there is any conflict
between this Order and the Cash Collateral Orders, the terms of the Cash Collateral Orders shall
control.
23. The requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6003(b) have been satisfied.
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 51 of 56
10
24. Notice of the Motion as provided herein shall be deemed good and
sufficient notice of such Motion and the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) are waived.
25. Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), this Order
shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.
26. The Debtors are authorized to take all steps necessary or appropriate to
carry out this Order.
27. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters
arising from or related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order.
Dated: __________________, 2017 Houston, Texas
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 52 of 56
Schedule 1
Bank Accounts
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 53 of 56
Bank Debtor Account Number (last four digits)
Account Name
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
3030 MPO Operating Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
2164 MPO A/P Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
2179 MPO Royalty Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Memorial Production Operating LLC
0132 MPO Cash Collateral
Account Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. Beta Operating Company,
LLC 1869 Beta Main Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Beta Operating Company, LLC
0759 Beta A/P Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company
4044 San Pedro Main Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company
0767 San Pedro A/P Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
MEMP Services LLC 0902 MEMP Services Main
Account Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. MEMP Services LLC 0910
MEMP Services Payroll Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
MEMP Services LLC 1926 MEMP Services A/P
Account
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 54 of 56
Exhibit C
Cash Management Chart
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 55 of 56
Memorial Production Partners
Cash Management System
1
1All accounts except the MPO Operating Account and MPO Cash Collateral Account are ZBA accounts
Source Number
MPO Operating Account1
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.XX3030
(Memorial Production Operating LLC)
MPO A/P AccountWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX2164(Memorial Production Operating
LLC)
MPO Royalty AccountWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX2179(Memorial Production Operating
LLC)
Beta Main AccountWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX1869(Beta Operating Company, LLC)
Beta A/P Account Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX0759(Beta Operating Company, LLC)
San Pedro Main AccountWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX4044(San Pedro Bay Pipeline
Company)
San Pedro A/P AccountWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX0767(San Pedro Bay Pipeline
Company)
MEMP Services Main Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.XX0902
(MEMP Services LLC)
MEMP Services Payroll Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.XX0910
(MEMP Services LLC)
MEMP Services A/P AccountWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
XX1926(MEMP Services LLC)
Overview of Debtors' Cash Management System
Oil and Gas Customer Receipts
(ACH/Wire)
JIB Receipts,Hedges, Misc.
Receipts(ACH/Check/Wire)
Oil and Gas Customer Receipts
(Wire)
MEMP Services LLC
San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company
Memorial Production Operating LLC
Beta Operating Company, LLC
P-Cards, Hedges, Bank Fees, Taxes, Vendors by
Wire, Misc.(Debit/Wire)
Royalty and Working Interest Payments
(ACH/Check)
Debt Service -RBL, Notes(Debit/Wire)
JIB Payments(ACH/Check)
Trade Vendors, Land Payments, Taxes, Misc
(ACH/Check/V-Card)
Trade Vendors, Taxes, Misc.
(ACH/Check/V-Card)
Employee Expense Reimbursements, Employee Benefits
(ACH/Check)
Payroll and Benefits(Debit/Reverse Wire)
Government Fees / Royalties, Misc.
(Debit/Wire)
Trade Vendors, Taxes, Misc.
(ACH/Check/V-Card)
Misc. Opex(Wire)
Certain Payroll(Wire)
KEY
Cash inflow into bank account Cash outflow from bank account Cash movement to & from bank account
MPO Cash Collateral Account
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.[XX0132]
(Memorial Production Operating LLC)
Cash Collateral Account for
Corporate Cards(Wire)
Case 17-30262 Document 8 Filed in TXSB on 01/17/17 Page 56 of 56