Upload
intervarsity-press-samples
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 138
In Search of
Moral Knowledgeovercming the fact-Value dichtmy
r Scott SMIth
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 238
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 338
IN SEARCH OF
MORAL KNOWLEDGE
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 438
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094
World Wide Web wwwivpresscom
Email emailivpresscom
copy983090983088983089983092 by R Scott Smith
All rights reserved No part o this book may be reproduced in any orm without written permission rom
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division o InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement o
students and aculty active on campus at hundreds o universities colleges and schools o nursing in the United States
o America and a member movement o the International Fellowship o Evangelical Students For inormation about
local and regional activities write Public Relations Dept InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA 983094983092983088983088 Schroeder
Rd PO Box 983095983096983097983093 Madison WI 983093983091983095983088983095-983095983096983097983093 or visit the IVCF website at wwwintervarsityorg
All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken rom the New American Standard Biblereg copyright
983089983097983094983088 983089983097983094983090 983089983097983094983091 983089983097983094983096 983089983097983095983089 983089983097983095983090 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983093 983089983097983095983095 983089983097983097983093 by Te Lockman Foundation Used by permission
Scripture quotations marked 983150983145983158 are taken rom HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL VERSIONreg
NIVreg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved worldwide
Cover design Cindy KipleInterior design Beth Hagenberg
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983091983096-983088 (print)
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983096983088983090983089-983096 (digital)
Printed in the United States o America infin
InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment and to the responsible use o naturalresources As a member o Green Press Initiative we use recycled paper whenever possible o learnmore about the Green Press Initiative visit wwwgreenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record or this book is available rom the Library o Congress
P 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089
Y 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 538
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Introduction 983089983089
P983137983154983156 O983150983141 A S983144983151983154983156 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 W983141983155983156983141983154983150 E983156983144983145983139983155
983089 Christian Biblical Ethics 983090983091
983090 Ancient Ethics 983092983091
Plato and Aristotle on Moral Knowledge
983091 Moral Knowledge rom Augustine through Aquinas 983093983093
983092 Moral Knowledge in the Reormation andthe Enlightenment Shit 983095983091
P983137983154983156 T983159983151 N983137983156983157983154983137983148983145983155983149 R983141983148983137983156983145983158983145983155983149 983137983150983140 P983151983155983156983149983151983140983141983154983150983145983155983149
U983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143 983137983150983140 A983155983155983141983155983155983145983150983143 T983151983140983137983161rsquo983155 D983151983149983145983150983137983150983156
M983151983154983137983148 P983137983154983137983140983145983143983149983155
983093 Options or Naturalistic Ethics 983089983088983095
983094 Naturalism Knowledge and the Fact-Value Split 983089983091983093
983095 More Modern Options 983089983093983095
Ethical Relativism Rawlsrsquos Political Liberalism and
Korsgaardrsquos Constructivism
983096 Introduction to the Postmodern Period 983089983095983097
A Plurality o Dierent Voices
983097 MacIntyrersquos Recovered homistic Ethics 983090983088983093
983089983088 Hauerwasrsquos Narrative Christian Ethics 983090983091983091
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 638
983089983089 Assessing MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos Projects 983090983094983089
P983137983154983156 T983144983154983141983141 T983151983159983137983154983140 983137 T983144983141983151983154983161 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
983089983090 Moral Realism and Addressing the
Crisis o (Moral) Knowledge 983090983096983091
983089983091 Religiously Based Moral Knowledgemdashand Final Issues 983091983090983095
Index 983091983093983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 238
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 338
IN SEARCH OF
MORAL KNOWLEDGE
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 438
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094
World Wide Web wwwivpresscom
Email emailivpresscom
copy983090983088983089983092 by R Scott Smith
All rights reserved No part o this book may be reproduced in any orm without written permission rom
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division o InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement o
students and aculty active on campus at hundreds o universities colleges and schools o nursing in the United States
o America and a member movement o the International Fellowship o Evangelical Students For inormation about
local and regional activities write Public Relations Dept InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA 983094983092983088983088 Schroeder
Rd PO Box 983095983096983097983093 Madison WI 983093983091983095983088983095-983095983096983097983093 or visit the IVCF website at wwwintervarsityorg
All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken rom the New American Standard Biblereg copyright
983089983097983094983088 983089983097983094983090 983089983097983094983091 983089983097983094983096 983089983097983095983089 983089983097983095983090 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983093 983089983097983095983095 983089983097983097983093 by Te Lockman Foundation Used by permission
Scripture quotations marked 983150983145983158 are taken rom HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL VERSIONreg
NIVreg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved worldwide
Cover design Cindy KipleInterior design Beth Hagenberg
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983091983096-983088 (print)
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983096983088983090983089-983096 (digital)
Printed in the United States o America infin
InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment and to the responsible use o naturalresources As a member o Green Press Initiative we use recycled paper whenever possible o learnmore about the Green Press Initiative visit wwwgreenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record or this book is available rom the Library o Congress
P 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089
Y 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 538
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Introduction 983089983089
P983137983154983156 O983150983141 A S983144983151983154983156 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 W983141983155983156983141983154983150 E983156983144983145983139983155
983089 Christian Biblical Ethics 983090983091
983090 Ancient Ethics 983092983091
Plato and Aristotle on Moral Knowledge
983091 Moral Knowledge rom Augustine through Aquinas 983093983093
983092 Moral Knowledge in the Reormation andthe Enlightenment Shit 983095983091
P983137983154983156 T983159983151 N983137983156983157983154983137983148983145983155983149 R983141983148983137983156983145983158983145983155983149 983137983150983140 P983151983155983156983149983151983140983141983154983150983145983155983149
U983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143 983137983150983140 A983155983155983141983155983155983145983150983143 T983151983140983137983161rsquo983155 D983151983149983145983150983137983150983156
M983151983154983137983148 P983137983154983137983140983145983143983149983155
983093 Options or Naturalistic Ethics 983089983088983095
983094 Naturalism Knowledge and the Fact-Value Split 983089983091983093
983095 More Modern Options 983089983093983095
Ethical Relativism Rawlsrsquos Political Liberalism and
Korsgaardrsquos Constructivism
983096 Introduction to the Postmodern Period 983089983095983097
A Plurality o Dierent Voices
983097 MacIntyrersquos Recovered homistic Ethics 983090983088983093
983089983088 Hauerwasrsquos Narrative Christian Ethics 983090983091983091
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 638
983089983089 Assessing MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos Projects 983090983094983089
P983137983154983156 T983144983154983141983141 T983151983159983137983154983140 983137 T983144983141983151983154983161 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
983089983090 Moral Realism and Addressing the
Crisis o (Moral) Knowledge 983090983096983091
983089983091 Religiously Based Moral Knowledgemdashand Final Issues 983091983090983095
Index 983091983093983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 338
IN SEARCH OF
MORAL KNOWLEDGE
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 438
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094
World Wide Web wwwivpresscom
Email emailivpresscom
copy983090983088983089983092 by R Scott Smith
All rights reserved No part o this book may be reproduced in any orm without written permission rom
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division o InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement o
students and aculty active on campus at hundreds o universities colleges and schools o nursing in the United States
o America and a member movement o the International Fellowship o Evangelical Students For inormation about
local and regional activities write Public Relations Dept InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA 983094983092983088983088 Schroeder
Rd PO Box 983095983096983097983093 Madison WI 983093983091983095983088983095-983095983096983097983093 or visit the IVCF website at wwwintervarsityorg
All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken rom the New American Standard Biblereg copyright
983089983097983094983088 983089983097983094983090 983089983097983094983091 983089983097983094983096 983089983097983095983089 983089983097983095983090 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983093 983089983097983095983095 983089983097983097983093 by Te Lockman Foundation Used by permission
Scripture quotations marked 983150983145983158 are taken rom HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL VERSIONreg
NIVreg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved worldwide
Cover design Cindy KipleInterior design Beth Hagenberg
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983091983096-983088 (print)
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983096983088983090983089-983096 (digital)
Printed in the United States o America infin
InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment and to the responsible use o naturalresources As a member o Green Press Initiative we use recycled paper whenever possible o learnmore about the Green Press Initiative visit wwwgreenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record or this book is available rom the Library o Congress
P 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089
Y 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 538
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Introduction 983089983089
P983137983154983156 O983150983141 A S983144983151983154983156 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 W983141983155983156983141983154983150 E983156983144983145983139983155
983089 Christian Biblical Ethics 983090983091
983090 Ancient Ethics 983092983091
Plato and Aristotle on Moral Knowledge
983091 Moral Knowledge rom Augustine through Aquinas 983093983093
983092 Moral Knowledge in the Reormation andthe Enlightenment Shit 983095983091
P983137983154983156 T983159983151 N983137983156983157983154983137983148983145983155983149 R983141983148983137983156983145983158983145983155983149 983137983150983140 P983151983155983156983149983151983140983141983154983150983145983155983149
U983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143 983137983150983140 A983155983155983141983155983155983145983150983143 T983151983140983137983161rsquo983155 D983151983149983145983150983137983150983156
M983151983154983137983148 P983137983154983137983140983145983143983149983155
983093 Options or Naturalistic Ethics 983089983088983095
983094 Naturalism Knowledge and the Fact-Value Split 983089983091983093
983095 More Modern Options 983089983093983095
Ethical Relativism Rawlsrsquos Political Liberalism and
Korsgaardrsquos Constructivism
983096 Introduction to the Postmodern Period 983089983095983097
A Plurality o Dierent Voices
983097 MacIntyrersquos Recovered homistic Ethics 983090983088983093
983089983088 Hauerwasrsquos Narrative Christian Ethics 983090983091983091
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 638
983089983089 Assessing MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos Projects 983090983094983089
P983137983154983156 T983144983154983141983141 T983151983159983137983154983140 983137 T983144983141983151983154983161 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
983089983090 Moral Realism and Addressing the
Crisis o (Moral) Knowledge 983090983096983091
983089983091 Religiously Based Moral Knowledgemdashand Final Issues 983091983090983095
Index 983091983093983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 438
InterVarsity Press
PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094
World Wide Web wwwivpresscom
Email emailivpresscom
copy983090983088983089983092 by R Scott Smith
All rights reserved No part o this book may be reproduced in any orm without written permission rom
InterVarsity Press
InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division o InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement o
students and aculty active on campus at hundreds o universities colleges and schools o nursing in the United States
o America and a member movement o the International Fellowship o Evangelical Students For inormation about
local and regional activities write Public Relations Dept InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA 983094983092983088983088 Schroeder
Rd PO Box 983095983096983097983093 Madison WI 983093983091983095983088983095-983095983096983097983093 or visit the IVCF website at wwwintervarsityorg
All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken rom the New American Standard Biblereg copyright
983089983097983094983088 983089983097983094983090 983089983097983094983091 983089983097983094983096 983089983097983095983089 983089983097983095983090 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983093 983089983097983095983095 983089983097983097983093 by Te Lockman Foundation Used by permission
Scripture quotations marked 983150983145983158 are taken rom HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL VERSIONreg
NIVreg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved worldwide
Cover design Cindy KipleInterior design Beth Hagenberg
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983091983096-983088 (print)
ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983096983088983090983089-983096 (digital)
Printed in the United States o America infin
InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment and to the responsible use o naturalresources As a member o Green Press Initiative we use recycled paper whenever possible o learnmore about the Green Press Initiative visit wwwgreenpressinitiativeorg
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record or this book is available rom the Library o Congress
P 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089
Y 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 538
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Introduction 983089983089
P983137983154983156 O983150983141 A S983144983151983154983156 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 W983141983155983156983141983154983150 E983156983144983145983139983155
983089 Christian Biblical Ethics 983090983091
983090 Ancient Ethics 983092983091
Plato and Aristotle on Moral Knowledge
983091 Moral Knowledge rom Augustine through Aquinas 983093983093
983092 Moral Knowledge in the Reormation andthe Enlightenment Shit 983095983091
P983137983154983156 T983159983151 N983137983156983157983154983137983148983145983155983149 R983141983148983137983156983145983158983145983155983149 983137983150983140 P983151983155983156983149983151983140983141983154983150983145983155983149
U983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143 983137983150983140 A983155983155983141983155983155983145983150983143 T983151983140983137983161rsquo983155 D983151983149983145983150983137983150983156
M983151983154983137983148 P983137983154983137983140983145983143983149983155
983093 Options or Naturalistic Ethics 983089983088983095
983094 Naturalism Knowledge and the Fact-Value Split 983089983091983093
983095 More Modern Options 983089983093983095
Ethical Relativism Rawlsrsquos Political Liberalism and
Korsgaardrsquos Constructivism
983096 Introduction to the Postmodern Period 983089983095983097
A Plurality o Dierent Voices
983097 MacIntyrersquos Recovered homistic Ethics 983090983088983093
983089983088 Hauerwasrsquos Narrative Christian Ethics 983090983091983091
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 638
983089983089 Assessing MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos Projects 983090983094983089
P983137983154983156 T983144983154983141983141 T983151983159983137983154983140 983137 T983144983141983151983154983161 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
983089983090 Moral Realism and Addressing the
Crisis o (Moral) Knowledge 983090983096983091
983089983091 Religiously Based Moral Knowledgemdashand Final Issues 983091983090983095
Index 983091983093983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 538
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments 983097
Introduction 983089983089
P983137983154983156 O983150983141 A S983144983151983154983156 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 W983141983155983156983141983154983150 E983156983144983145983139983155
983089 Christian Biblical Ethics 983090983091
983090 Ancient Ethics 983092983091
Plato and Aristotle on Moral Knowledge
983091 Moral Knowledge rom Augustine through Aquinas 983093983093
983092 Moral Knowledge in the Reormation andthe Enlightenment Shit 983095983091
P983137983154983156 T983159983151 N983137983156983157983154983137983148983145983155983149 R983141983148983137983156983145983158983145983155983149 983137983150983140 P983151983155983156983149983151983140983141983154983150983145983155983149
U983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143 983137983150983140 A983155983155983141983155983155983145983150983143 T983151983140983137983161rsquo983155 D983151983149983145983150983137983150983156
M983151983154983137983148 P983137983154983137983140983145983143983149983155
983093 Options or Naturalistic Ethics 983089983088983095
983094 Naturalism Knowledge and the Fact-Value Split 983089983091983093
983095 More Modern Options 983089983093983095
Ethical Relativism Rawlsrsquos Political Liberalism and
Korsgaardrsquos Constructivism
983096 Introduction to the Postmodern Period 983089983095983097
A Plurality o Dierent Voices
983097 MacIntyrersquos Recovered homistic Ethics 983090983088983093
983089983088 Hauerwasrsquos Narrative Christian Ethics 983090983091983091
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 638
983089983089 Assessing MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos Projects 983090983094983089
P983137983154983156 T983144983154983141983141 T983151983159983137983154983140 983137 T983144983141983151983154983161 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
983089983090 Moral Realism and Addressing the
Crisis o (Moral) Knowledge 983090983096983091
983089983091 Religiously Based Moral Knowledgemdashand Final Issues 983091983090983095
Index 983091983093983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 638
983089983089 Assessing MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos Projects 983090983094983089
P983137983154983156 T983144983154983141983141 T983151983159983137983154983140 983137 T983144983141983151983154983161 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
983089983090 Moral Realism and Addressing the
Crisis o (Moral) Knowledge 983090983096983091
983089983091 Religiously Based Moral Knowledgemdashand Final Issues 983091983090983095
Index 983091983093983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 738
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 838
10486251048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
sciences In light o such a mindset it is only fitting that we have a vast
plurality o moral opinions
For those immersed in such cultures it is easy to see how people (especiallyemerging adults) would take or granted this plurality and biurcation o acts
rom values as simply the way things are morally speaking Western cultures
such as the United States deeply reinorce the notion that morality is in the
eye o the beholder something Allan Bloom noted decades ago1048626 Indeed de-
scriptively we are very pluralistic morally However morality involves more
than just whatever is the case at its core it is a normative enterprise
But should morality be seen as being ldquoup to usrdquo and thereore deeplypluralistic Is it true that morality is basically a human construct I so
to what extent and in what way(s) Alternatively could it be that some
older ethical views that maintained that morals are not human constructs
are perhaps true afer all even though such views have been marginalized
or ldquodiscreditedrdquo
Other kinds o questions traditionally have also been part o ethics For
example what is the nature o morality and what kind o things are morals
Moreover what is their grounding ontologically Why do moral principles
or virtues have anything to do with us How does that answer relate to what
kind o thing we are How do we know what morals are How do we know
what is right or wrong or good or bad How does our ability to know these
things relate to what kind o thing we are
O course these ldquootherrdquo kinds o questions belong primarily to the
domain o two undamental philosophical branches metaphysics and epis-
temology and as they bear upon ethics In addition other disciplines have
their own contributions to ethics such as theology religion sociology and
anthropology Disciplines such as business medicine sports or politics are
subjects o ethical reflection as well Ethics simply does not seem to be an
isolated discipline
But since at least the rise o both empiricism in Western philosophy and
Kantrsquos noumenal-phenomenal distinction there have been major changes
in peoplersquos metaphysical and epistemological views Now all disciplines
2Allan Bloom ldquoIntroductionrdquo to Te Closing o the American Mind 983090983093th Anniversary Edition (New
York Simon amp Schuster 1048625983097983096983095) O course his claim was broader than just morality it was that
people see even truth as being relativistic
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 938
Introduction 10486251048627
need implicitly or explicitly a metaphysic and an epistemology What is the
nature o what is being studied and how can we know them are core issues
or any discipline No matter what answers are given to these questions theyinvolve metaphysical and epistemological reflection and implications
Ethics is not immune to these implications Despite major shifs in ethical
theories that have been offered over the last 1048626104862910486241048624 or so years they all involve
metaphysical and epistemological implications Accordingly it should be no
surprise that we would find explicit metaphysical and epistemological in-
sights among many early ethical theorists especially until several key turns
in philosophy such as the turn to language or the turn to interpretation983091
Whether they were right or wrong in these earlier views they still worked out
their ethical theories in close conjunction with their metaphysics and episte-
mology As a ew quick examples Plato and Aristotle held core metaphysical
and epistemological views that intertwine closely with their ethics So did
Aquinas (who also incorporated theological insights) and many others
But even beore the linguistic turn there had been other major shifs in
philosophy and they affected both metaphysics and epistemology Te rise
o the importance o empiricism rationalism and materialism occurred
largely during the Enlightenment Te legacy o these shifs and others since
has been considerable such that in epistemology alone our received epis-
temic assumption starting at least with Hume is largely that the mindrsquos
contact with its objects is not one that matches up with them but makes
them Dallas Willard (1048625104863310486271048629ndash1048626104862410486251048627) calls this a ldquoMidas ouch epistemologyrdquo
such that we simply cannot know reality as it is in itsel or the very act o
epistemically accessing these objects somehow does something to what they
are thereby erecting a barrier over which the mind simply cannot reach to
access the things as they are in themselves1048628 Tis assumption leaves us with
a number o competing epistemologies yet due to this received heritage we
3In the linguistic turn philosophers seemed to have become tired o trying to show how their
metaphysical claims about reality could indeed match up with it Instead philosophers made a
shif to look into the workings o our language or we can and do talk about reality Te linguis-
tic turn represents a shif away rom the importance o doing metaphysics to that o philosophyo language See my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge Philosophy o Language Afer MacIntyre
and Hauerwas (Aldershot England Ashgate 9830909830889830881048627) pp 983090983090-983090983094 I see the turn to interpretation to
be a urther move or the same kind o reason4See Dallas Willard ldquoHow Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects Te Godrsquos Eye View Vindi-
catedrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 983093-983090983088
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1038
10486251048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
have no way to decide which one among them should be embraced over and
against its competitors Moreover ontological shifs have helped precipitate
these epistemic ones Or so Willard and I each have argued elsewhere1048629Just as these shifs had significant impacts in metaphysics and episte-
mology broadly speaking so also they had corresponding impacts specifically
in moral ontology and moral epistemology as these philosophies were being
worked out For instance historically we have shifed in the West rom
thinking o morals largely as being real universal properties that all humans
can know (and or whom they were appropriate due to their respective na-
tures) Now people ofen conceive o morals as human products that weknow rom historically limited contingent and particular (and thereore ir-
reducibly pluralistic) vantage points Alternatively even i there were such
universal moral truths we could never know them as such because o the
more general epistemological position that no one has direct access to reality
a view that in turn trades upon key metaphysical moves As Willard once
remarked to me i people on a major university campus were to claim to
know objective truth they very well could be branded ascists In short we
largely have given up on morals as universal transcendent and objective in
their being and we have rejected them as something that all people can know
But now many ethical thinkers seem to believe they can do their theo-
rizing without regard or metaphysical epistemological or even theological
considerations Nevertheless they write and make their claims as though
they know what is the case with morals including what they are and how
we know this Yet as I will try to show our having knowledge is not indi-
erent to ontology I correct the ontological and epistemological views one
holds will make all the difference or onersquos moral theories
Indeed I believe we have reached our present moral situation due to the
moves people have made in metaphysics and epistemology (and theology)
But were these metaphysical epistemological and moral moves justified
afer all I believe we need to rethink our current ethical mindsetsmdashand the
dominant philosophical theories o today that influence themmdashto see i
rationally we really should give them our allegiance However to do that
5Eg see my Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge and my Naturalism and Our Knowledge o Reality
esting Religious ruth-claims (Farnham England Ashgate 9830909830881048625983090) See also Dallas Willardrsquos ldquoA
Crucial Error in Epistemologyrdquo Mind 983095983094 (1048625983097983094983095) 98309310486251048627-9830901048627
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1138
Introduction 10486251048629
most effectively we need to understand how in the West we got to the
present moral mindsets Otherwise we may overlook any wisdom ound
in the past and we may not understand the moves others made that haveled us to the present I we do not understand those moves we will tend to
just accept our present moral mindsets as axiomatic as given Nor will we
will be able to assess rationally whether they were indeed ones that people
should have accepted
My goal will be to examine these thinkersrsquo ethics so that we can under-
stand and see i their ethical views themselves can withstand scrutiny and
make sense We also need to understand and assess their major metaphysicaland epistemological views (even i just at the level o assumptions) and how
these relate to their ethics I pertinent I also will try to show how their
theological views influence their ethics
In order to look at any given viewrsquos prospects or moral knowledge I must
examine the epistemological credentials o that moral theory I will do that
in two main ways For one i a view claims (even implicitly) to offer us
knowledge o how morality (and the rest o reality) really is but cannot
make good on that claim due to various epistemological or metaphysical
positions then that will count against the theoryrsquos rational acceptance For
another knowledge is more or less justified (or warranted) true belie1048630
Tereore we need to see i a given moral theory even on its particular
merits morally can give us justification or believing it or even to see that it
is true For instance i a moral theory could justiy such actions as murder
as right or even obligatory then it seems something has gone wrong with
that theory So I will be looking at various ethical theories in terms o moral
knowledge rom both these standpoints Can they make good epistemo-
logically on their claims about what reality is including their view o the
ldquonaturerdquo o morality And can they give good reasons why we should believe
them Alternatively do they have various problems (o whatever sort) that
undermine their rational acceptance
6I say ldquomore or lessrdquo in light o the suggested deficiencies posed by Gettier counterexamples Yeteven though he is motivated by them and thereby finds ault with the tripartite definition o
justified true belie as knowledge even Alvin Plantinga lands on a tripartite definition war-
ranted true belie as knowledge He himsel does not seem to think he needs to find additional
criteria to molliy Gettier See Plantingarsquos Warrant Te Current Debate (New York Oxord Uni-
versity Press 10486259830979830971048627)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1238
10486251048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Te need to survey historically how we have arrived at the present orms
the basis or part 1048625 which encompasses chapters 1048625 through 1048628 In chapter 1048625
I will start with Christian biblical ethics since Western ethics has been in-fluenced strongly by Christianity I place it first because o its strength o
influence at least historically and because at least the oldest Old estament
writers predate the ancient Greeks Ten in chapter 1048626 I will explore the views
o Plato and Aristotle Chapter 1048627 represents a significant jump up to the
times o Augustine and then the period known as the Middle Ages We will
study his views as well as those o other religious and philosophical influ-
ences including the Jewish philosopher Maimonides the Islamic ethicistso that period and Tomas Aquinas In chapter 1048628 we will look at several
shifs that took place with the Reormers Luther and Calvin Nevertheless
when we turn to the Enlightenment we will see a significant break away
rom a largely realist line o thought Tere I will start with an examination
o Tomas Hobbes David Hume and Immanuel Kant Ten we will look at
the nineteenth-century utilitarians Bentham and Mill
While I do not intend or this historical survey to give us a detailed history
o ethics I will use it to give us understanding o how we have arrived at the
present1048631 My goal in part 1048625 is to get to the present so that we can dig in more
deeply thereafer and assess the dominant contemporary ethical views we have
inherited especially in terms o their moral epistemology and their moral on-
tology Tat is the burden o part 1048626 which spans chapters 1048629 through 10486251048625 Tere I
engage and assess more in depth the ethical views o naturalism relativism and
postmodernism probably the most deeply held amilies o ethical views today
For a number o reasons I will find them deeply unworthy o rational accep-
tance and argue that the ldquoactrdquo side o the act-value split is utterly mistaken
In chapter 1048629 I introduce naturalism as a worldview and explain how
naturalists have developed various approaches to ethics I will discuss these
mainly in terms o metaethics and then some particular emphases they have
contributed to important ethical topics such as human dignity meaning and
purpose I will try to make connections between particular views and their
implications or moral knowledge but my chie goal in this chapter is or usto understand these naturalistic views
7For that there are many other good works to consult For instance see erence Irwinrsquos three-volume
work Development o Ethics A Historical and Critical Study (New York Oxord University Press 983090983088983088983095)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1338
Introduction 10486251048631
However in chapter 1048630 I will turn to scrutinize one o naturalismrsquos greatest
perceived strengthsmdashour ability to know reality on its ontological basis
However I will argue that i the ontology o naturalism were true we couldnot know anything Since there are many things we do know naturalism is
alse Tis means at least that the ldquoactrdquo side o the deeply entrenched act-
value split is alse and must be rejected or it depends upon naturalism
Beore leaving views that have developed more in the modern period I
examine three more sets o ethical views in chapter 1048631 in terms o their ra-
tional acceptance as well as the prospects or moral knowledge on their
bases First is Ethical Relativism (ER) which I contend developed philo-sophically in light o empiricismrsquos and naturalismrsquos influences I will describe
and assess ER Despite its glaring rational deficiencies ER nonetheless is
attractive to many people including Christians so I believe we need to try
to understand that phenomenon Second is the social contract view o John
Rawls and third is the ldquoKantian constructivismrdquo o Christine Korsgaard
In chapters 1048632 through 10486251048625 we will explore another contemporary set o
ethical viewsmdashthose that have been influenced by the postmodern milieu
Perhaps claims to have knowledge o universal moral truths really are just
disguised assertions o a will to power or o oppression We also have today
a widely acknowledged diversity o moral ldquovoicesrdquo and it ofen seems that
there is no way to adjudicate between them1048632 Tis is a main eature o ethics
in postmodern times
Tus in chapter 1048632 I will survey a sampling o ethical voices who write in
light o the ldquopostmodern turnrdquo including not just philosophical but also
religious views I will explore the eminist views o Bev Harrison the lib-
eration theology o Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and then the communicative dis-
course ethics o Juumlrgen Habermas Finally we will touch on the more prag-
matist views o Jeffrey Stout
Having surveyed these kinds o views I will give two urther specific
case studies in order to delve into postmodern ethics in more depth Tese
views happen to be developed by two ethicists who write broadly speaking
as Christians In chapter 1048633 I ocus on the views o Alasdair MacIntyre one
8For instance I think the dominant assumption in religious ethics programs today is that we all
construct our moral views and we are lef with an irreducible plurality o moral viewpoints and
discourses (not to mention religious ones too)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1438
10486251048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
o the most significant thinkers in ethics today whether in philosophical
religious or theological circles Chapter 10486251048624 will look closely at the ethics o
Stanley Hauerwas who is perhaps the most influential Christian theologicalethicist today making him a key figure in religious ethics In both o their
cases I will reconsider their ethics in light o developments in my under-
standing and in chapter 10486251048625 I will offer a new critical assessment1048633
In part 1048627 I engage in my own constructive task o developing a theory to
see whether we can have moral knowledge Since much conusion exists in
epistemology in general in chapter 10486251048626 I first need to develop a theory o
knowledge that will overcome the problems we will have seen in other viewsand then I will need to apply it to ethics I will argue that knowledge o re-
ality requires a radically different ontology than most philosophers have
been willing to countenance one with the existence o immaterial sub-
stances properties that are universals and essences Not just any ontology
will work to allow us to have knowledge
Applied to morals I will argue there are at least a ew moral truths we
simply do know which means that strictly speaking the value side o the
act-value split is alse Ten I will show that the best explanation or these
ew morals is that they are metaphysically objective and universal Tese
findings will support some o the earlier ethical views we have studied
However this resultant morally realist ontology and epistemology have
urther implications how do we best explain these findings In addition
could there exist more such morals that we can know So in chapter 10486251048627 I
will argue that their best explanation is that they are grounded not just in
God but in the Christian God (and specifically in Godrsquos character) and that
means there may well be more such objective morals that we can know
through revelation In a sense then this book also supplies an extended
moral argument or the Christian Godrsquos existence
Despite my argumentation that leads to this conclusion as the most ra-
tional one to believe that finding still will not sit well with many today
9Earlier in Virtue Ethics and Moral Knowledge I criticized MacIntyrersquos and Hauerwasrsquos views dueto several problems with how they seem to understand the language-world relationship How-
ever MacIntyre has responded to those criticisms arguing that I had misinterpreted him in a
key respect By examining their views once again I will attempt to show how and to what extent
my first interpretation was mistaken and then I will offer a revised interpretation and assessment
o their projects
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1538
Introduction 10486251048633
Tereore I consider urther contemporary objectionsmdashparticularly rom
evilmdashagainst my conclusion that the best explanation or moral knowledge
is its being grounded in the Christian God In sum I aim to show that con-trary to our received wisdom morals are best explained as being (a) meta-
physically objective and universal (b) something that we can know as such
and (c) grounded in the Christian God We can have moral knowledge and
we need to reject the many alse views that have led us to conceive o mo-
rality as merely a human construct
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1638
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1738
PART ONE
A Short History
of Western Ethics
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1838
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 1938
1
CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL ETHICS
To help us understand how and why we have our current moral
mindsets we need to understand how we got to our present moral con-
dition I will begin our historical survey with Christian ethics rather than
with Plato and Aristotle since the Old estament authors arguably predate
them Historically Christianity has been one o the most significant influ-
ences on Western ethics So any historically ocused account o Westernethics should consider its impact In this chapter I will concern mysel
mainly with major contours o Christian ethics rom a biblical standpoint
and its implications or moral knowledge983089 In addition I will begin to ex-
plore objections to and issues with biblical ethics1048626
O983148983140 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Old estament ethics utilizes a mixture o different kinds o ethical rea-soning While the Law o Moses is certainly a dominant component and it
is composed o deontological commands there is much room or appeals to
other kinds o ethical reasoning too In the Old estament actions are right
or wrong in and o themselves and not necessarily because o the conse-
quences they have However there also is room or utility and consequences
For example consider the wisdom literature especially Proverbs which
1Tere are various ways to approach Christian ethics and later we will look at the views o Augustine
Aquinas Beverly Harrison Gustavo Gutieacuterrez and Stanley Hauerwas in their respective periods2Later in chapter 10486251048627 I will return to address two urther objections to situate them in a more ap-
propriate context Tose will include the objections to Godrsquos order or Israel to destroy the Canaanites
and the widely held view that Christianity is a significant root o injustice and oppression
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2038
10486261048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
contains a measure o utilitarian reasoning Many proverbs contain explicit
descriptions o the consequences o certain actions and character traits For
instance the ool behaves in a certain way and reaps accordingly and thisappeals to a consequentialist line o thought not just deontological prin-
ciples However ultimately the Law is the ground or principles in the
wisdom literature Tereore these principles are not some reestanding
kind o system Rather than a sel-sufficient system or discovering morality
they are a supplement to the laws or principles ound in the Law
Tere is also a measure o appeal to sel-interest In Deuteronomy 104862610486321048625-1048631
Moses is charging IsraelNow it shall be i you diligently obey the L983151983154983140 your God being careul to do
all His commandments which I command you today the L983151983154983140 your God will
set you high above all the nations o the earth All these blessings will come
upon you and overtake you i you obey the L983151983154983140 your God Blessed shall you
be in the city and blessed shall you be in the country Te L983151983154983140 shall cause
your enemies who rise up against you to be deeated beore you
However in verse 10486251048629 Moses says ldquoit shall come about i you do not obey theL983151983154983140 your God to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes
with which I charge you today that all these curses will come upon you and
overtake yourdquo
What is the basis o the ethical appeal Tese are principles but the point
is to do them and you shall live or that is in your best interests Why be
cursed God does not want to destroy Israel instead Jehovah calls on them
to obey so that they may live and prosper Tereore Old estament ethicsincludes some appeal to sel-interest and utility even though the appeal to
commands and deontological principles is the overarching moti
Tere is another kind o ethical appeal in the Old estament which
people tend to call natural moral law I we look at the wisdom literature like
Proverbs observations o nature define wisdom and olly Te appeals claim
that i we do these certain things we will be blessed whereas the ool sits by
idly and becomes poor
Moreover different oracles are given to the nations by the minor prophets
and charges are made against them that they have done specific wrongs For
instance Amos addresses specific charges against nations and peoples sur-
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048629
rounding Israel such as Ammon (104862510486251048627-10486251048629) Tey are condemned or ripping
ldquoopen the pregnant women o Gilead in order to enlarge their bordersrdquo Tey
savagely attacked these women and their unborn simply or territorial gainIn general these peoples have committed injustice oppressed the poor and
committed wanton violence What is the implied basis or their moral re-
sponsibility In other words how were they to know not to do these things
Tough God gave Israel the Law these Gentiles should not have done these
things Te implication is that they also knew better Tereore there must
be some ldquotrue universally binding moral principlesrdquo that are knowable by
all people and are ldquorooted in creation and the way things are maderdquo whichpeople tend to call natural moral law983091
Let us turn now to examine the Law more closely So ar I have been
reerring to the Law o Moses generally but we can distinguish the moral
civil and ceremonial laws As or the moral law I will ocus especially on the
en Commandments Te civil law concerned social institutions and social
relationshipsmdashhow Israelites were supposed to treat each other Te cere-
monial law ocused on the proper worship o God
Moreover God gave the Law to the people o Israel who were supposed
to live it out individually and corporately in a theocracy Accordingly as
Scott Rae notes there is no significant distinction between a personal ethic
and a social ethic1048628 Clearly this approach differs rom our common Western
stress upon the autonomous individual
Holiness is another major theme o Old estament ethics Sanctificationmdash
being set apart as holy or Godmdashis a critical theme that also resonates closely
with the New estament Israel was to be a witness to the nations and there
were different ways or that to happen For instance God gave guidelines or
how Israelrsquos king was to behave in Deuteronomy 1048625104863110486251048630-10486251048631 ldquoMoreover he shall
not multiply horses or himsel nor shall he cause the people to return to
Egypt to multiply horses since the L983151983154983140 has said to you lsquoYou shall never
again return that wayrsquordquo1048629 God also gave prohibitions against having multiple
wives or greatly increasing silver or gold again in contrast to the other
3J P Moreland and William Lane Craig Philosophical Foundations or a Christian Worldview
(Downers Grove IL InterVarsity Press 9830909830889830881048627) p 9830921048625983088 Later in chapter 983092 we will look at what
one o the most significant Reormers John Calvin had to say about natural moral law4Scott B Rae Moral Choices 983090nd ed (Grand Rapids Zondervan 983090983088983088983088) p 98309010486255Tus some o the basic limitations were in place long beore Israel demanded a king in 1048625 Samuel 983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2238
10486261048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
nationsrsquo kings even though Israelrsquos kings violated these commands1048630
ake also or example the treatment o women Israel was supposed to
treat well those women taken captive in battle whereas i other nations tookwomen captive they ofen became slaves who were mistreated or raped
However that was not to be the case with Israel For them ldquoslavesrdquo (or
better ldquotemporarily indentured servants within Israelrdquo) were all to be treated
in the same humane way Furthermore Paul Copan has argued that Israel
was not to return runaway slaves rom neighboring countries to their
masters instead they were to be protected as aliens who were vulnerable
Within Israel indentured servitude was voluntary and prompted by severeeconomic need1048631 Tus Israel was to be set apart and very different rom the
surrounding nations including in its worship o the one true God
Another major theme in Old estament ethics is obedience Tere
however obedience is never just or dutyrsquos sake as Kant would claim later
Obedience is not an end in itsel it is to cultivate and demonstrate personal
loyalty to a personal God
Notice too that God gave the Law afer he had provided or Israel afer
Jehovah had brought them out o the land o Egypt God did not give them
statutes and ordinances up ront and require obedience Instead Jehovah de-
livered them rom Egypt all the way on their journey to Mount Sinai Tere
God provided a covenant to make Israel the people o the Lord Tereore
obedience enters into ethics afer God has provided and cared or them
As a last significant theme let us examine the social dimension o Old
estament ethics Te very structure o Israelrsquos society was to reflect Godrsquos
character For one people were to practice justice (Mic 10486301048632) but the prophets
brought messages o condemnation when people had perverted it Te Year
o Jubilee also prevented injustice by prohibiting people rom becoming
dispossessed permanently rom their homeland (Lev 10486261048629) God was the ul-
timate owner o the land yet he had apportioned sections to the tribes and
the amilies within tribes held property I people became poor and could
not pay their debts they could sell their land or a time but it would revert
6Eg see 1048625 Kings 10486251048625 or the report on the results rom Solomonrsquos having many wives and concu-
bines 1048625 Kings 10486259830881048625983092-983090983097 comments on the riches he multiplied7Paul Copan Is God a Moral Monster Making Sense o the Old estament God (Grand Rapids
Baker 98309098308810486251048625)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048631
to the original owners at the jubilee Otherwise there could be people living
permanently in poverty For another aspect the people were to trust God
such that in the sabbatical year they did not plant crops but had to trust himto provide again in the ollowing year
Consider also the law o redemption as exemplified in Boazrsquos redemption
o Ruth and her land God had provided different ways to care or the people
in society who like Ruth had lost their husbands and were vulnerable Rae
points out that the law o gleaning is a kind o ldquoworkarerdquo as opposed to
welare where the needs o the poor were provided because the landholders
were not to glean every bit o the crops1048632
Tey were to leave some crops orthe poor who had to gather them
Does this mean that Israel and Judah lived out consistently these ideals
and commands No they repeatedly strayed rom Godrsquos principles and
heartrsquos desire which became the basis or many prophetic calls to repentance
and eventually or Godrsquos judgment upon them
N983141983159 T983141983155983156983137983149983141983150983156 E983156983144983145983139983155
Te Old estament ocused on Israel as the people o God In the New es-
tament however the stress is more on morality or the church or or Chris-
tians as the body o Christ As part o New estament ethics Godrsquos people
are not under the Lawmdashthat is the ceremonial or the civil lawmdashbut the
moral law still applies Tere is the same broad objective toomdashto gloriy
God by bearing witness to his rule over the earthmdashonly now there are di-
erent means It is not through Israel as a theocratic nation but now through
the church which has a different institutional ramework or this task
Deontology remains a major emphasis in the New estament Jesus did
not nulliy the Law he came to ulfill it Still he reinterprets it by placing a
crucial emphasis not only upon actions but also intentions Christians are
not to merely go through the motions o orgiving their brother or sister
they are to orgive him or her rom the heart While deontological this
approach is not a callous rigid commitment to principles Tere is much
room or compassion as modeled by JesusIn contrast the Pharisees seem to have an unbalanced deontology with
8Rae Moral Choices p 983090983094
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2438
10486261048632 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
an overemphasis on a rigid adherence to rules (including their own) and
insensitivity to people and their needs Consider Matthew 104862510486261048633-10486251048628 where
Jesus heals a man with a withered hand on the sabbath According to thePhariseesrsquo laws people were not to do any work on that day and clearly they
considered this act to be work He is grieved at the Phariseesrsquo blind ad-
herence to rules and resulting lack o compassion or the man Moreover he
is not rejecting the sabbath command but rather how the Pharisees had
misread it and lacked compassion or the person
Consider also Mark 10486311048633-10486251048627 where we have the account o the Phariseesrsquo
view o ldquoCorbanrdquo (things dedicated to God) According to them those itemscould not be used to help people in need Again Jesus condemns their
teaching and practice since a rigid adherence to laws replaced compassion
or people Tey misinterpreted the spirit o the principle and then used it
to harm people
Te primary audience o New estament ethics is Jesusrsquo ollowers Ethics
seem to flow rom the requirements or membership in the kingdom Tis
does not mean that ethical living is the same thing as membership Being a
good person does not make one a Christian and get that person into the
kingdom o heaven But Christrsquos ollowers are to live out the kingdomrsquos
values Tus obedience is very important as a consistent mark o Jesusrsquo ol-
lowers Tere is a close relationship between the moral aspects o lie in re-
lation to spiritual ones
Obviously another key aspect o New estament ethics is that it is an
ethic o love Jesus taught that the two greatest commandments are to love
the Lord with all onersquos heart soul and mind and to love onersquos neighbor as
onesel (Mt 1048626104862610486271048630-10486271048633) We are to live in utter dependence upon the Spirit in
deep heart and mind unity with God which is to counteract our deault
attitude o usurping Godrsquos throne (Gen 10486271048629) Clearly these commands are
interested in onersquos heart attitude and not merely onersquos outward behavior
As in Old estament ethics there is a special place or the poor and Jesus
models that too In Luke 1048625104862810486251048630-10486261048628 Jesus tells the parable about the people
invited to a large banquet When the invitees excuse themselves romcoming immediately the man orders his slave to bring in the poor crippled
blind and lame off the street Te man is going to throw a party and he
shows great compassion to the hurting and marginalized Likewise Jesus
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486261048633
shows a special place or the poor and needy in Godrsquos heart because that
shows Godrsquos unconditional love
How are Christians to live this kind o ethic Tey cannot live it out justby education and sel-discipline Instead they can live it out only in utter
dependence upon the indwelling power o the Spirit o Christ Tus the
Holy Spirit is necessary or the moral lie or a kingdom member and this
is where the virtues enter into our discussion Indeed the New estament
places a very strong emphasis on the virtues with the goal o becoming like
Jesus Yet the virtues are not divorced rom commands and principles Tey
work together such that the moral lie is not just doing the right thing oravoiding doing wrong It is about becoming like Jesus and that should issue
orth in certain kinds o actions
Te virtues are the ruit o the Spirit Tese virtues are not limited to just
the list rom Galatians 104862910486261048626-10486261048627 or many other books in the New estament
express other normative character qualities For instance in Colossians
104862710486251048626-10486251048627 Paul tells the Colossians to ldquoput on a heart o compassion kindness
humility gentleness and patience bearing with one another and orgiving
each otherrdquo Te Holy Spirit produces these virtues in Christians Yes there
are things believers are to do to cultivate them but the Holy Spirit is nec-
essary or their realization
Te virtues characterize our goal or telos o becoming like Jesus in char-
acter In contrast vices (to use Aristotlersquos term) are the ldquodeeds o the fleshrdquo
Let me examine some verses to illustrate the New estament usage o the
word telos and related word orms In Colossians 104862510486261048632 Paul writes ldquoHe is the
one we proclaim admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom so
that we may present everyone ully mature in Christrdquo (983150983145983158) Te goal is that
all believers reach maturity (perection or completeness) in Christ
Ephesians 104862810486251048626-10486251048627 is another example Paul is discussing the role o spir-
itual gifs in Christians which are given ldquoor the equipping o the saints or
the work o service to the building up o the body o Christ until we all
attain to the unity o the aith and o the knowledge o the Son o God to a
mature man to the measure o the stature which belongs to the ullness oChristrdquo (emphasis mine) Maturity in the New estament involves knowledge
o who Jesus is and it closely involves growing up into the ldquoullnessrdquo (or
completeness) o Christ It also involves building up the body o Christ and
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2638
10486271048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
thus it is not a solitary individual growth process Paul continues or Chris-
tians are to grow up into all aspects into Christ in order to reach their telos
which is Christ himselo help accomplish these goals the New estament emphasis is on living
morally in community (ie the church) In his writings Paul does not have
in mind the rugged individual Rather he addresses the body o believers
as do the other apostles Christians are to love one another even as Jesus
loved them (Jn 1048625104862710486271048628-10486271048629) which cannot be done in isolation
A natural question might arise at this point Which is primary in the New
estament virtues or principles Tat is is the primary emphasis o Newestament ethics on cultivating the character o Jesus or on obedience to
commands In one sense commands are subordinate to virtues in that the
purpose o principles is to enable us to obey and cultivate the character o
Jesus Unlike Kantrsquos theory deontological commands in the Bible are not to
be obeyed in some disinterested way We are not to be disinterested about
the good1048633 Yet in another sense which we already have examined virtues
are subordinate in that Christians need principles and commands to guide
them in how the good Christian is to live Another point is that believers are
not to do their duty (ie obey New estament commands) simply or dutyrsquos
sake Rather Christians gloriy and please God by their aith and obedience
and by their becoming more like Jesus Moreover in the Old estament
obedience to God is good in itsel but God gave the laws or the peoplersquos
good In another crucial respect both principles and virtues are subordinate
to the overarching goal o bringing glory to God and living in a manner
pleasing to him Te ultimate goal thereore is not to make Christians into
rule keepers but lovers and ollowers o Jesus
One other insight to bring up about the virtues is the corollary emphasis
that they place upon human flourishing Te idea is not simply to do what
is right but to aim at our chie purpose in lie We will see how Aristotle
understands this notion but here it is worth noting that the New estament
writers see our chie end as loving and gloriying God and Godrsquos purpose
9Here I am drawing on insights given by David Horner in his paper ldquoTe Pursuit o Happiness
Why Christian Ethics Should be Eudaimonisticrdquo given at the Evangelical Philosophical Society
national meeting Atlanta November 9830901048625 9830909830889830881048627 (unpublished) See also his ldquoTe Pursuit o Hap-
piness C S Lewisrsquo Eudaimonistic Understanding o Ethicsrdquo April 9830901048625 983090983088983088983097 in the online journal
In Pursuit o ruth A Journal o Christian Scholarship wwwcslewisorgjournalp=1048625983094983097
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048625
or our lives is to make us like Jesus in our character So why should a person
be moral Because it glorifies God and is appropriate or us due to our nature
as Godrsquos image bearersIn summary biblical ethics whether in the Old or New estaments
clearly presupposes that people have knowledge o moral truths that are
what they are independently o how we think eel or even talk about them
Tat is they exist objectively and we can know them as such whether
through general revelation (using reason) or special revelation (which also
o course appeals to the use o reason)
A F983141983159 P983154983141983148983145983149983145983150983137983154983161 I983155983155983157983141983155 983159983145983156983144 983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155 983156983151
B983145983138983148983145983139983137983148 E983156983144983145983139983155
Besides our consideration o the major ethical motis in the Old and New es-
taments there also are specific kinds o issues and objections that have been
raised against Christian biblical ethics o some o these issues we now turn
Te Euthyphro dilemma Arguably a major emphasis in biblical ethics is
on obedience to divine commands Tis raises some issues a key one o
which is the ldquoEuthyphro dilemmardquo Plato first raised this issue and others
such as the atheist philosopher Michael Martin (1048625104863310486271048626ndash) have used it since
then9830891048624 Te dilemma has two ldquohornsrdquo Is something good because God com-
mands it or does God command it because it is good
Tis issue relates keenly to divine command theory According to William
Alston (1048625104863310486261048625ndash1048626104862410486241048633) that view holds the thesis that ldquodivine commands are con-
stitutive o moral obligationrdquo983089983089 Alston is developing the work o Robert Adams
who argues that ldquoethical wrongness is (ie is identical with) the property o
being contrary to the commands o a loving Godrdquo9830891048626 Now with Euthyphro i
something is good or right because God commands it then it seems his com-
manding it makes it right It would not be right in and o itsel Or does God
command it because it is good I so then God seems subject to some external
10See Michael Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo July 9830901048627 1048625983097983097983095 on ldquoTe Secular
Webrdquo Internet Infidels website wwwinfidelsorglibrarymodernmichael_martinrapehtml11See William P Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo in Philosophy o Religion A Reader
and Guide gen ed William Lane Craig (New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University Press 983090983088983088983090)
p 983090983096983092 Alston acknowledges that he is ollowing and developing the work o Robert Adams12Robert Adams ldquoDivine Command Metaethics Modified Againrdquo Journal o Religious Ethics 983095 no 1048625
(1048625983097983095983097) 983095983094 cited in Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983092 See also Adamsrsquos chapter
10486251048625 ldquoDivine Commandsrdquo in his Finite and Infinite Goods (New York Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983097)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2838
10486271048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
moral standards that he must consult beore commanding anything Tese
moral standards would exist apart rom Godrsquos creative activity Moreover Godrsquos
commanding something seems redundant and unnecessary I so why wouldGod bother to issue a commandment Would we not already know it
Let us explore the first horn o the dilemma more closely According to
it theoretically God could command something that seems clearly wrong
to us Yet because God commanded it that would make it good God could
command people to fly airplanes into the infidelrsquos buildings and that
command would make that act right Call this view theistic voluntarism
something is right because God willed it to be so Te concern here is thatthe reason why something is morally right seems arbitrary depending on
whatever God happens to will
As an initial reply we may note first that Plato is not talking about the
same God as the Christian one He was living in the time o belie in the
pantheon o Greek gods whom he did not want the rulers o the polis to
study or the gods were immoral Plato did not think seriously that these
gods even existed but even i they did they would have very different char-
acter qualities than the Christian God
However that reply does not alleviate the problem when posed against the
Christian God More importantly Christians maintain that Godrsquos character and
essence are good and that provides our standard or what good is Tereore
God cannot command just any action because Godrsquos character sets the bound-
aries on what God can do However just how successul is this reply
Alston argues that the first horn not only presents the challenge that
Godrsquos commands (and morality itsel ) are arbitrary but the theist has no way
to construe adequately the goodness o God o see this we should distin-
guish between metaphysical goodness and moral goodness Alston reminds
us that while we may be able to construe God as metaphysically good (that
is in realizing the ullness o being) this horn prevents our construing Godrsquos
moral goodness as anything but Godrsquos own obedience to his commands
However that result is not what Christian theists mean when they speak o
Godrsquos goodness Rather they have in mind Godrsquos moral perection (under-stood or instance that God is loving merciul and just)983089983091
13Alston ldquoWhat Euthyphro Should Have Saidrdquo p 983090983096983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 2938
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048627
Alston considers a strategy or the divine command theorist that would
limit the area constituted by divine commands to creatures alone so that we
still can maintain that God is essentially good I that is possible then ldquotherewill be nothing arbitrary about his commands indeed it will be metaphysi-
cally necessary that he issue those commands or the bestrdquo9830891048628 Alstonrsquos move
involves denying that moral obligation attaches to God o help see this he
explores the meaning o the terms moral ldquoobligationrdquo and moral ldquooughtnessrdquo
For his purposes he understands them as alternative ormulations9830891048629 He
grants that when we use ldquooughtrdquo we do not merely express imperatives He
also grants or sake o argument that there are objective moral acts9830891048630
Alston proceeds to investigate whether there are any such objective moral
acts o the sort that God ought to do some action What kind o acts would
they be When we think o God as perectly good in terms o his actions
Alston contends that we think it is supremely good that God acts as he does
What is at stake he observes is what is added by claiming that this is how
God ought to act As Alston points out ldquoI it adds nothing there can be no
objection to speaking o how God ought to actrdquo9830891048631
However in terms o analogies with ourselves there is clear a difference
between what is a good thing to do and what we ought to do For instance
Alston considers how it would be a good thing to learn Sanskrit but he
would not be under an obligation to do so Tis suggests that one re-
quirement or an ldquooughtrdquo statement is that general practical principles or
rules apply and set orth the conditions in which an action is required
merely permitted or altogether orbidden9830891048632 Tese rules he argues are in
orce only with respect to agents with whom there is ldquoa possibility o their
playing a governing or regulative unctionrdquo and that possibility can occur
only with agents who can violate them Accordingly social mechanisms can
reinorce appropriate behavior as well as sanction inappropriate actions9830891048633
Importantly then moral principles as a kind o these practical prin-
ciples apply only to agents who can violate them However in the case o an
14Ibid15Ibid p 98309098309698309216Ibid p 98309098309698309517Ibid18Ibid19Ibid pp 983090983096983095-983096983096
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3038
10486271048628 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
agent who necessarily will act in accordance with them it is hard to see how
there is any sense in which we can say that that agent ought to do some
action A Tat is ldquothere is no oothold or the lsquooughtrsquo there is nothing tomake the ought-principle true rather than or in addition to a actual
statement that S will (necessarily) act in this wayrdquo10486261048624
Now Alston applies these findings to the first horn o the Euthyphro di-
lemma Te divine command theorist may maintain consistently that divine
commands are constitutive o the acts o moral obligations In addition
these acts do not apply to God or the reasons seen above Since God is
essentially good he necessarily will act in accordance those acts and so hisgoodness does not consist o obedience to his own commands Moreover
ldquoGodrsquos commands to us are an expression o his perect goodnessrdquo1048626983089 Accord-
ingly it seems Alston has rebutted successully the first hornrsquos objections to
divine command ethics
Let us now address the second hornrsquos issues Tey were (1048625) God seems
subject to some urther standard Tat is to call God good seems to require
some prior notion o goodness In addition (1048626) Godrsquos commanding some-
thing seems redundant since we would know it already Regarding the first
just because we may need various ways to know that God is good it does not
ollow that God is not the ground or goodness itsel
On the second point while it is true that we probably can figure out some
natural moral truths through our reason (eg intentionally flying airplanes
into buildings in order to terrorize and murder people is wrong) it seems
we can suppress what we know to be true Alternatively we can sear our
consciences by deliberate choices to pursue what is wrong In addition
sometimes we do disagree morally with each other Tereore it does not
seem to be the case that even i we already know some moral truth Godrsquos
commanding it would be redundant
Still Martin objects that appealing to Godrsquos character simply postpones
the problem in two ways For one ldquoi Godrsquos character is the way it is because
it is good then there is an independent standard o goodness by which to
evaluate Godrsquos characterrdquo10486261048626 Moreover
20Ibid p 98309098309698309621Ibid p 98309098309798308822Martin ldquoAtheism Christian Teism and Raperdquo p 983093
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3138
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048629
Suppose Godrsquos character is good simply because it is Godrsquos character Ten i
Godrsquos character were cruel and unjust these attributes would be good But
could not one reply that God could not be cruel and unjust since by necessityGod must be good It is true that by necessity God must be good But unless
we have some independent standard o goodness then whatever attributes
God has would by definition be good1048626983091
Nevertheless as we have seen this argument is wrongheaded As we saw
with Alston Paul Copan argues ldquoGod does not say keep promises because
he ought to (which would imply some external moral standard) Rather the
theist claims that God will keep promisesrdquo since it is impossible or God notto act morally10486261048628
For another Martin argues that we do not need God or there to be moral
goodness even i moral goodness is part o his essence Consider benevo-
lence as an essential attribute o moral saints Even i there were no saints it
does not ollow he claims that benevolence would not be a property o
anything Similarly i we do not need moral saints to have benevolence then
we also do not need God or there to be moral goodness even i moral
goodness is part o his essential nature10486261048629
For now let me reply simply that the theist need not claim that morality
would be impossible without God Tat is there are some moral truths
people just know whether theists atheists or something else and Martin
has given us several such examples However there is another significant
issue involved with answering his second objection and that is to give an
adequate explanation o what moral properties are At this stage in our
historical sketch we have yet to see other options people have suggested
or the metaphysical status o morals including Martinrsquos own ontology
which is naturalistically based But surveying and assessing the various
options metaphysically is what we will do as we progress through the
coming chapters
Now let us turn to a second set o preliminary issues or Christian bib-
lical ethics which involve considerations o natural law
23Ibid p 98309424Paul Copan ldquoCan Michael Martin Be a Moral Realistrdquo Philosophia Christi 1048625 no 983090 (1048625983097983097983097) 98309498309225Michael Martin ldquoA Response to Paul Copanrsquos Critique o Atheistic Objective Moralityrdquo Philoso-
phia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 983095983093-983096983097 See also Copanrsquos rejoinder ldquoAtheistic Goodness Revisited A
Personal Reply to Michael Martinrdquo Philosophia Christi 983090 no 1048625 (983090983088983088983088) 9830971048625-1048625983088983092
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3238
10486271048630 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Various issues with natural law First some Christians have regarded
natural law as useless I so then why bother appealing to it Second does
our knowledge o natural moral laws come rom culture andor our up-bringing Tird does natural law commit the is-ought (or naturalistic)
allacy Fourth i natural moral laws are grounded in creation and known
by reason should we not all agree on what counts as morally natural Yet
people have disagreed on such matters such as the morality o slavery that
Americans in the southern states practiced How do we account or that
First on some Christiansrsquo views natural moral law is in effect useless
because people are so radically allen Tat is sin has corrupted us such thatwe cannot know without special revelation what is wrong or right I think a
view that natural law is in effect useless due to the extent o the allrsquos impact
upon us goes too ar I it were useless then I should not be able to appeal to
peoplersquos reasoning to know that there are moral principles (eg murder is
wrong rape is wrong) that are true However on many occasions I have been
able to do so and people have understood and agreed While we will never
get a long list o detailed moral commands and virtues rom natural law
nevertheless it does seem that different peoples are able to know some basic
moral truths Moreover biblical passages such as Romans 104862510486251048632-10486261048624 and 104862610486251048628-10486251048629
show that Paul expected people even without the revealed Law o Moses to
know enough about Godrsquos character and attributes rom creation to be ac-
countable or their actions
On the other hand according to biblical ethics to say that we do not need
deontological principles given to us by God also goes too ar It presupposes
that there is no problem with our knowing these things Yet we all have
much capacity to rationalize away what we know to be good and not do it
especially when we have a strong sel-interested desire to do otherwise
Furthermore on Christian ethics what God commands ought to have a
strong relationship to natural law Tey should not be so radically dichot-
omous to have no relationship with each other For instance our reason tells
us that murder is wrong but suppose that all o a sudden God willed us to
murder and thus made it right Tere would be a radical disconnect betweenwhat we know by reason and what (allegedly) would have been given by
special revelation It should not be that way especially i Godrsquos character is
good and i God acts consistently with his character
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3338
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048631
I people are not so radically allen as to make natural moral law useless
then it can provide a basis or appealing to reason and revelation as ways
to know moral truth and so biblical ethics has a way to apply to all peoplenot just to believers By reason and intuition all people can know moral
truths which God has revealed in nature Moreover biblically specially
revealed moral truths act as a consistent supplement and specification o
natural law
As a second issue does such knowledge o natural moral laws come rom
training Tat is is our knowledge o such truths due to our upbringing and
or our culture Certainly different cultures may have even radically differentethical views For example they may practice treachery as a virtue I so it
seems they are not going to be able to see treacherous actions as being
wrong For instance Don Richardson talks about the Sawi tribe and his
amilyrsquos work among them as a missionary in his book Peace Child10486261048630 Te
Sawi in one tribe treacherously would invite people rom another tribe to
eat a meal with them However afer eating they would kill and eat their
guests including their brains in order to show their total domination over
them Tus when he first explained the story o Jesus they greatly esteemed
Judas who treacherously had betrayed Jesus unto death or money
He also explains that the Sawi people highly valued the Richardsonsrsquo help
as they brought important technology (or example saws) to help them
build their homes and medicine that preserved their lives rom devastating
diseases When intense fighting broke out with neighboring villages and
Richardson thought that its continuation was due to their presence there he
made it known that they must leave However that occasion gave an op-
portunity or another important Sawi moral principle to surace Te Sawi
told him that i their violence would drive him and his amily away then
they would make peace with their neighbors
Tey did this by exchanging a child a peace child rom each tribe which
the other tribe raised and cared or more careully than even its own children
Obviously this required a tremendous heart-wrenching sacrifice by a amily
rom each tribe but the importance o making peace with each other out-weighed their value o treachery and continued violence and death For the
26Don Richardson Peace Child (Ventura CA Regal Books 1048625983097983095983093)
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3438
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3538
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486271048633
As a third issue does natural moral law commit the is-ought allacy
Tat is how do we justifiably derive what ought to be simply rom what
is the case Tis latter question raises an issue that will resurace severaltimes during our overall study For now let me limit my comments to our
present ethical ocus Tat is on a biblical ethic all people are intrinsi-
cally moral beings since all are image bearers We are like God in that we
have moral intellectual spiritual relational and other capacities10486261048632 Tus
certain things are appropriate or inappropriate or us due to our nature
We bear Godrsquos image and a key part o that is being moral I so then on
this view the ldquooughtrdquo can be derived rom what ldquoisrdquo the case since we areintrinsically moral beings Now this brie discussion about this issue with
natural law will not address all issues associated with it However we will
return in part 1048627 to the question o whether our nature does indeed have
an intrinsic moral dimension
As a ourth issue even i some moral positions seem to be justified by
appeals to nature or creation over time people still may disagree over
whether they are true or alse For instance today it is clear to Americans
that the kind o slavery practiced in the southern states is wrong Tey not
to mention others have come to a point now where they see that such
slavery clearly is wrong but o course that was not always a widely held
view Slave owners in the South even tried to justiy their moral position by
appealing to the nature o Aricans Abolitionists on the other hand could
appeal to the intrinsic wrongness o treating ellow humans as mere property
as a moral act grounded in nature Such issues and appeals to intuition we
will discuss more when we address relativism For now let us note that we
know some moral truths more intuitively than others and some seem to be
very clear or example that murder is wrong However as with the example
o slavery i some people did not see slaves as persons then the orce o that
moral truth would not really hit them
Moral conflicts Another key issue with biblical ethics is what we are to
do when two moral principles conflict (apparently or actually) Can people
live out both moral principles consistently Tis issue will help us makedistinctions between absolute and objective morals
28And as we will see on a substance dualist view o human nature it is true that we all have such
capacities whether or not they are ever developed into realized properties
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3638
10486281048624 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Consider first the Hebrew midwives Let us look at Exodus 104862510486251048629-10486261048625
Ten the king o Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives one o whom was
named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah and he said ldquoWhen you are
helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool i
it is a son then you shall put him to death but i it is a daughter then she shall
liverdquo But the midwives eared God and did not do as the king o Egypt had
commanded them but let the boys live So the king o Egypt called or the
midwives and said to them ldquoWhy have you done this thing and let the boys
liverdquo Te midwives said to Pharaoh ldquoBecause the Hebrew women are not as
the Egyptian women or they are vigorous and they give birth beore the
midwie can get to themrdquo So God was good to the midwives and the people
multiplied and became very mighty Because the midwives eared God He
established households or them
Pharaoh commanded them to kill but apparently they lied and God
blessed them How do we account or this A first option denies that such
conflicts even can happen Tat is God would not give commands that con-
flict On that view the person should trust God to open the way out o such
apparent dilemmas10486261048633 Yet in Joshua 1048626 it seems that Rahab did ace a real
conflict On the one hand i she were to tell the truth to the authorities o
her hometown Jerichomdashthat she knew where the Israelite spies were lo-
catedmdashthen they would have aced punishment or torture perhaps even
death Furthermore in so doing she would have displeased their God She
told the spies she knew that their God was the true God and the God o
Israel had pronounced a rightul judgment upon Jericho She wanted to
identiy hersel with the people o the true God On the other hand i she
were to lie to her authorities then she could preserve the spiesrsquo lives
Tere still are two more options Te second holds that yes there can
be real moral conflicts since we are in a allen world but it still is wrong
when one does not obey all the commands Tat is the midwives acted
wrongly by lying to Pharaoh but that act was the lesser o two evils
However there is a moral problem with this view in that a person has a
duty to sin We are blameworthy it seems i we do the lesser evil eventhough there is no choice Moreover the act that we would be held blame-
29Eg Rae makes this suggestion on p 1048627983093 o Moral Choices
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3738
Christian Biblical Ethics 10486281048625
worthy even though we could do nothing about it seems morally wrong
Tere is a third option however that holds that in cases o actual moral
conflict we do no wrong i we do ulfill the morally more important o thetwo commands in conflict Consider the example o Nazis at the door o a
house in occupied Holland Tey barge in and demand to know i the resi-
dents have any Jews in their house Suppose in act they are hiding Jews I
the residents say yes at the least the Jews will be tortured and likely mur-
dered However i they lie then they have sinned What should they do
o help answer this let us consider two kinds o moral truths to see i we
can make distinctions between absolute and objective moral truths Let ustry to unpack our ways to compare them Te our ldquodimensionsrdquo we will
consider are metaphysics epistemology scope and applicability First meta-
physically what are these things Te answer is that both absolute and ob-
jective morals are transcendent immaterial and universal Yet biblically
Godrsquos character still grounds them Second epistemologically how do we
know them Te same way applies or both we know them by general rev-
elation (reason) and special revelation
What are they in terms o scope Both objective and absolute morals are
or all people However in terms o applicability we may make a distinction
between them In the Nazi case i telling the truth is an absolute it means
that the moral principle always applies without any exceptions On an ab-
solutist view in terms o applicability the residents would have to tell the
soldiers ldquoYes we do have Jews hererdquo
On an objectivist view however there is a hierarchy o moral principles9830911048624
Prima acie one should obey the moral principles that are in conflict However
like the Nazi example in cases o genuine conflict when one simply cannot do
both actions one should obey the morally weightier principle Consider again
the case o the midwives In their response to Pharaoh they do no wrong as
evidenced by Godrsquos not having them repent o a wrong done Tey did not tell
the truth but something much more important outweighed it983091983089
30Consider eg Matthew 1048625983090 and 9830909830901048627983092-983092983088 on a moral hierarchy31A reviewer suggested that just because the midwives did no wrong (since God did not ask them to
repent) that seems like an ldquoodd criterion or whether or not God does in act approve o somethingrdquo
Tis is a good caution Te reviewer also suggested polygamy in the Old estament as a counter-
example to my line o argumentation Nevertheless my context here has been to discuss morals in
cases o genuine conflict when you cannot do both I do not think this alleged counterexample fits that
Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them
8122019 In Search of Moral Knowledge by R Scott Smith - EXCERPT
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullin-search-of-moral-knowledge-by-r-scott-smith-excerpt 3838
10486281048626 I983150 S983141983137983154983139983144 983151983142 M983151983154983137983148 K983150983151983159983148983141983140983143983141
Does this approach make obedience to the moral principle situationally
relative No or it is right in terms o the metaphysical epistemological and
scope dimensions o both objective and absolute morals It even is intrinsi-cally right Here however something morally weightier overrode its applica-
bility Crucially the conflict must be genuine and not merely onersquos own ration-
alization to justiy onersquos preerences able 10486251048625 helps categorize these findings
Table 11 Absolute and Objective Morality in Biblical Ethics A Comparison
Absolute Morals Objective Morals
MetaphysicallyWhat are morals
Transcendent universal moralproperties that are what they arewhether or not anyone believesthem or talks about them (theyare mind-independent) biblicallythey are grounded in God
Identical
EpistemologicallyHow do we know them
Reason or special revelation Identical
ScopereferenceTo whom do they apply
All people Identical
ApplicabilityCan they be overridden in
cases of genuine conflict Alternatively when dothey apply
No they apply 100 of the time Yes they can There is a hierarchy ofobjective moral truths In cases of
genuine conflict the morally moreimportant principle outweighs theless important one (eg do notmurder versus do not lie)
C983151983150983139983148983157983155983145983151983150
In Christian biblical ethics at least as traditionally conceived morals are
objectively real and God grounds them Tey are true and they are nor-
mative or all people due to our nature as image bearers Tese moral truths
are knowable as such in part by reason (general revelation) and more com-
pletely and precisely in special revelation (Scripture) Having finished this
introduction to biblical ethics we now will turn to address the thought o two
ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle in terms o their ethics especially
regarding what morals are and how we know them