Upload
alan-armstrong
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
In-Delta Fish Screen FacilitiesIn-Delta Fish Screen Facilities
Delta Wetlands Proposed Facilities and Basis for
Re-Engineered Facilities
Webb Tract Diversions and DischargesWebb Tract Diversions and Discharges
Bacon Island Diversions and Discharges
Bacon Island Diversions and Discharges
Two Main Locations
Re-engineered
Now
Diversion Plan and Elevation - 5/10/01
Diversion Plan and Elevation - 5/10/01
Booster Pumps Located on New Levee Section
Fish Screen
Proposed Fish Screen - 86 cfs each max.
Proposed Fish Screen - 86 cfs each max.
Hinged Pipe to Remove Screen when not in Use
No Cleaning System
Some Existing Siphons to be Screened, but Contribution is Unclear
Some Existing Siphons to be Screened, but Contribution is Unclear
Habitat Islands = 200 cfs (existing water right)
Webb Tract = 4500 cfs
32 New Siphons/Pumps = 2750 cfs
7 Existing Siphons = 1750 cfs (or 250 cfs each???)
Bacon Island = 4500 cfs
32 New Siphons/Pumps = 2750 cfs
28 Existing Siphons = 1750 cfs (or 62 cfs each??)
Typical Siphons are in the 10 -20 cfs max range…They are not proposed to be enlarged
???
DW Proposed Design Issues/Problems
DW Proposed Design Issues/Problems
• Intake Screen Unproven at this Scale• Fish Screen Criteria Not Met• Screen Structure and Support Inadequate
– Hinge, Screen, Piling, Bracing, Etc.
• Pipe/Pump Hydraulic Issues• Settlement Impacts• Levee Stability Impacts• Erosion• Cyclic Loads and Fatigue• Retrofit of Existing Siphons Uncertain
Operations and Maintenance Issues
Operations and Maintenance Issues
• Manual Cleaning is Inadequate• Sedimentation and Dredging• Corrosion Potential and Cathotic
Protection• Poor Access to Screens (cranes, boats)• Difficult Underwater Inspection• Settlement Monitoring and Adjustment• Flow Monitoring and Data Collection• Starting the Siphon• Pump Maintenance
Hinge Design Loads and FatigueHinge Design Loads and Fatigue
Cleaning System FailureCleaning System Failure
Andreotti Fish Screen9/98
Material Selection ConsiderationsMaterial Selection Considerations
Potential Environmental Issues of DW Alternative
Potential Environmental Issues of DW Alternative
• Fish Predation• Larval Fish Loss• Recreation/Boating Limitations• Aesthetics• Pump Noise• Evaluation Facilities Needed• Maintenance Activities• Construction Impacts• Water Quality at Discharge Stations
• Old Siphon Pipe Adequacy
• Electrical Requirements for Automation
• Site Issues
• Structural Adequacy
Uncertain Retrofit of Existing Facilities for Screening
Uncertain Retrofit of Existing Facilities for Screening
Siphon Screen ExampleHorseshoe Bend (30 cfs)Siphon Screen ExampleHorseshoe Bend (30 cfs)
Fish Screen Criteria Drove Alternative Facilities Design at
Intake Site
Fish Screen Criteria Drove Alternative Facilities Design at
Intake Site• Screen area inadequate for manual
cleaning
• Screen mesh is too large
• Screens over 40 cfs subject to hydraulic uniformity and siting criteria
• Not a “Distributed Intake” concept
Potential Benefits of Re-Engineered Consolidated Facility
Potential Benefits of Re-Engineered Consolidated Facility
• Operations
• Maintenance
• Structural Integrity
• Hydraulic Improvements
CCWD Los Vaqueros IntakeOld River Pump Station
CCWD Los Vaqueros IntakeOld River Pump Station
Example of Consolidated FacilityExample of Consolidated Facility
RD108
830 cfs
Sac. River
Example of Consolidated FacilityExample of Consolidated Facility