25
Improving T&E Participation in the Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation Process Requirements Generation Process Chuck Burdick & Keith Montgomery Chuck Burdick & Keith Montgomery Lockheed Martin Simulation, Training & Support Lockheed Martin Simulation, Training & Support Presentation #6448 “The Role of the T&E Community in the Requirements Process” Lockheed Martin Center for Innovation Lockheed Martin Center for Innovation Paul Bross Paul Bross

Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

Improving T&E Participation in the Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation ProcessRequirements Generation Process

Chuck Burdick & Keith MontgomeryChuck Burdick & Keith MontgomeryLockheed Martin Simulation, Training & SupportLockheed Martin Simulation, Training & Support

Presentation #6448“The Role of the T&E Community in the Requirements Process”

Lockheed Martin Center for InnovationLockheed Martin Center for InnovationPaul BrossPaul Bross

Page 2: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 2

Requirements GenerationRequirements Generation

•• The Government regularly conducts analysis The Government regularly conducts analysis to determine requirements, select system to determine requirements, select system capability parameters, perform costcapability parameters, perform cost--benefit benefit tradetrade--offs, etc. offs, etc. -- Analysis is a critical element in providing capable, Analysis is a critical element in providing capable,

cost effective solutions suitable to requirementscost effective solutions suitable to requirements•• To support this analysis, the analytical To support this analysis, the analytical

community maintains several models and community maintains several models and simulations of future warfighting threats and simulations of future warfighting threats and capabilitiescapabilities-- Most studies are tied to legacy Service modelsMost studies are tied to legacy Service models-- Threat and System data sets are updated regularlyThreat and System data sets are updated regularly

Page 3: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 3

Requirements Analysis & SimulationRequirements Analysis & Simulation•• Typically, for an OSD sponsored study of capabilities, each Typically, for an OSD sponsored study of capabilities, each

Service or major DoD Agency provides one or more Service or major DoD Agency provides one or more simulations of preference. For example:simulations of preference. For example:-- Thunder/STORM for the Air Force, Thunder/STORM for the Air Force, -- COSMOS/SEAS for IntelCOSMOS/SEAS for Intel-- ITEM for the Navy,ITEM for the Navy, -- ELIST for LogisticsELIST for Logistics-- JICM for the ArmyJICM for the Army -- MIDAS for Strategic LiftMIDAS for Strategic Lift-- EADSIM for Missile DefenseEADSIM for Missile Defense -- Pythagoras for SOFPythagoras for SOF

•• These simulations are readily available, but obtaining the These simulations are readily available, but obtaining the data for representing friendly forces, threat forces, and the data for representing friendly forces, threat forces, and the situation 10 or 20 years out for each of the models has situation 10 or 20 years out for each of the models has been a challenge been a challenge

•• To address this, the OSD Analytical Community* has To address this, the OSD Analytical Community* has developed the Analytical Agenda, a collaborative analytical developed the Analytical Agenda, a collaborative analytical framework, to examine Defense Strategy and Capabilities framework, to examine Defense Strategy and Capabilities requirements along with a common source of credible requirements along with a common source of credible data, the Joint Data Support (JDS) Officedata, the Joint Data Support (JDS) Office

* Office of the Sec of Def (Policy), JCS J8, and OSD PA&E

Page 4: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 4

Analytical Agenda TenetsAnalytical Agenda Tenets

•• Make analyses more effective and relevant for Make analyses more effective and relevant for decisiondecision--makingmaking-- Focus debate on assumptions and issuesFocus debate on assumptions and issues-- Help synchronize strategic planning activities throughout DoDHelp synchronize strategic planning activities throughout DoD

•• Provide a common starting point for joint analysesProvide a common starting point for joint analyses-- Scenarios characterize the range of defense challengesScenarios characterize the range of defense challenges-- Future joint warfighting CONOPS are developed/examinedFuture joint warfighting CONOPS are developed/examined-- Analytic assessments (baselines, data, and studies) are accessibAnalytic assessments (baselines, data, and studies) are accessible and le and

well documentedwell documented•• Support a collaborative, transparent, and continuously Support a collaborative, transparent, and continuously

ongoing analytical process with the Services, ongoing analytical process with the Services, COCOMS, Joint Staff, and OSD involvedCOCOMS, Joint Staff, and OSD involved-- Train and sustain a critical mass of analystsTrain and sustain a critical mass of analysts-- Managed by OSD Policy, Joint Staff, and PA&EManaged by OSD Policy, Joint Staff, and PA&E

Create a Common Simulation Environment for Planning, Programming, Acquisition, Testing, Experimentation, and Training

Page 5: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 5

Analytical Baseline ProcessAnalytical Baseline Process

StrategyOPLANs

CONPLANs Threat CONOPS Data

National Leadership

COCOM DIA

Current YearAnalyticalBaseline

CJCSCFDB

C&PFUE

JPG

JPGJP

GJP

G

JPG

JPG

Environment

CPGNMS

NSS

NMSCPG

Current Year:

NationalDef Strategy

StrategyDefense Planning

ScenariosMulti-Service

Force DeploymentStudies/Wargames, etc

National Leadership

OUSD (P) Joint Staff

Future YearAnalyticalBaseline

Studies

PA&E

MCSOA 06OA 05

JPG

JPG

JPG

JPGJP

GJP

GOA-04

CPGNMS

Future Year:

NSS

NMS

SPG

NationalDef Strategy

Page 6: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 6

Conducting a Study with Multiple ModelsConducting a Study with Multiple Models

Study

BMD Analysis

Integrated Air Ops

Thunder/STORM

ISR Analysis

EADSIM

Ground Warfare

Wargames

JICM

COSMOS

C2 Modeling

Analytica

MobilityAnalysis

MIDAS

Special Operations

Unit BehaviorPythagoras

Manual Wargames

MaritimeInterdiction

ITEM

WMDModeling

VLS Track

Having common scenarios and data

does not solve all the analytical problems

Most studies are conducted using

multiple, incompatible models

Page 7: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 7

Analytic Community ModelsAnalytic Community ModelsC/Blue is Campaign-level, M/Green is Mission-level, andE/Brown is Engagement-level of detail

Only one model

currently stretches

across the M&S

Toolkit

Page 8: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 8

Alternative Analytical Modeling MethodologyAlternative Analytical Modeling Methodology

StudyPlan

BMD Analysis

Integrated Air Ops

ISR Analysis

Thunder/ Storm

EADSIM

Ground Warfare

Integrated CampaignAnalysis

• Integrated Warfight • Integrated C3ISR• Integrated Logistics• Dynamic Behaviors

JICM &Wargames

COSMOS

C2 Modeling Analytica

MobilityAnalysis

MIDAS

SpecialOperations

MaritimeWarfare ITEM

Joint Analysis System

PythagorasOnce all the data is in a

single model, excursions or new analysis can be

conducted without reactivating all the feeder

models

CommonMetrics

RapidExcursions

Page 9: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 9

Integrated Joint Campaign ModelingIntegrated Joint Campaign ModelingAnalysis Paradigm: All input integrated into a single, joint environment

Response

Sustainment

Requirements

Strategic MobilityOperationsTheater Logistics

Requirements

Supplies

Destruction of assets, disruption of deployment network, fact assessments

“Integrated”“Integrated”

JAS

International Shipping Local & Regional Infrastructure Intel, Comms, TBMD, WMD,

Warfighting

Continuous Interaction

JAS Paradigm:All CAPABILITY areas integrated in a single, operational environment

Basic Scenario Entities: Forces (US Military, Allies, Neutrals, Adversaries, Terrorists, US Government & Host Nation, Civil Agencies, NGOs/PVOs, Populations)Intelligence, Perception, and Knowledge Base: Multi-source Collection, prior knowledge, rule setsOrganization, Directives & orders, Communications) - C2: Multi-actor Info sharing/ tiered dissemination, Rules of Engagement, Decision Process, Communications InteroperabilityResponse Plans (CONOPS): Range from Facility –> Port –> Region –> National -> Coalition, entities with both common & unique capabilitiesLogistics & Support: Support for Civil Authorities; constrained transportation, food, fuel, and shelter

Page 10: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 10

AgentAgent--Based OperationsBased Operations

Owns orControls

“Thinking,”Planning, Decision Making

Location, speed, direction

Detecting, recognizing, identifying

Communications-based interface to other BSEs

Basic Scenario Entity (BSE)

Command & Control

CommunicationsManager

Sensor ResourceAccount

Platform

BSE

Tracking the BSE’s assets

and consumable resources

• BSE -- a friendly unit, enemy unit, or major system operating in the battle space. Examples:

-- Operational HeadquartersOperational Headquarters -- Land: Units, NeighborhoodsLand: Units, Neighborhoods-- Support HeadquartersSupport Headquarters -- Air: Flights, military & civilAir: Flights, military & civil-- Airbases and seaportsAirbases and seaports -- Maritime: Ships, small craftMaritime: Ships, small craft-- Infrastructure: Power, HInfrastructure: Power, H22OO -- Space: Sensors & CommsSpace: Sensors & Comms-- CiviliansCivilians

Effects-based and muchfaster than Real Time

Event-based, stochastic model providing detailed cause and effect outcomes

Page 11: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 11

JAS C4ISR is UniqueJAS C4ISR is UniqueSENSORSSENSORSSENSORSSENSORS

ExplicitCOMMS

UpdatedPerception Decisions*

• Every Sensor input, including Human Intelligence is recorded• Ground Truth is simultaneously recorded for comparison

• Over 70 types of operational messages currently employed (could be increased)• Uses explicit networks with capacities and delays

• Simulates information fusion• Common Operational Picture maintained• Sources of all information recorded

Actions

• Every BSE has a basic Command & Control capability appropriate to the BSEs purpose, e.g. explicit headquarters units, artillery unit, supply and transportation unit, etc.) giving a set of allowable decisions.• A BSE’s C2 capabilities are further enhanced by plug-ins which give specific new functionality to either a single BSE or a class of BSEs, e.g. a Supply Planner• Knowledge Bases are assigned to individual BSEs or classes of BSEs to allow them to employ user-selected facts, rules, and actions.

*

• Decisions & Actions are traceable to their underlying information

Page 12: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 12

Joint Data InputsJoint Data InputsSynthetic Environment

CONOPS

Federation “Hooks” (as req’d)

Deployment • Orders & Plans

• Land/Air/Maritime• ISR Collection• Any Other Object

• Formations & Positioning• Logistics• Intelligence • Doctrine

• Solar/Lunar• Atmospheric• Sea/Sub Surface

• Transmission Loss• Ambient Noise

• Terrain• Movement• Line of Sight

• HLA Certified/DIS capable• JSAF Demonstrated• Air Defense Demonstrated

• Origin• Port of Embarkation• Port of Debarkation

Basic Scenario Entities• Forces/Population Centers• Units/Civil Groups• Equipment

• Characteristics• Interactions• Performance

RawData

RawData

FeederModel

RawData

FeederModel

FeederModel

Behaviors/Soft Factors• Training Level• Country Of Origin/Side Changing• Morale/Cohesion/Level of Commitment• Degradation of Unit

Page 13: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 13

Staff Members/Subject Matter Experts1 3 5 7 9

7

5

3

1

JAS Scenario Levels of EffortJAS Scenario Levels of EffortTi

me

(mon

ths)

•• Large Analytical Baseline Scenarios builds are data intensive anLarge Analytical Baseline Scenarios builds are data intensive and require ~ 9 persons 6 months d require ~ 9 persons 6 months to build whether in a set of legacy models or in JASto build whether in a set of legacy models or in JAS

•• However, excursions are quick using existing JAS scenariosHowever, excursions are quick using existing JAS scenarios•• Reusing an existing scenario to conduct studies and evaluate plaReusing an existing scenario to conduct studies and evaluate plans requires much less effortns requires much less effort•• The concept is to maintain the major scenarios in a status whereThe concept is to maintain the major scenarios in a status where they can be provided in they can be provided in

executable format to any interested (and approved) userexecutable format to any interested (and approved) user

MCO – 2 (from scratch)

MCO – 1 (from scratch)

Balanced Joint Domains

AirMaritime

LandSOF

Spacewith

CommunicationsISR

Logistics

HLD Vignette

MCO – 2 (QVI Excursion)

MCO-1 mini-Excursions

Studies/Scenariosreusing

MCO Scenarios

Page 14: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Why Test in a Complex EnvironmentWhy Test in a Complex Environment

• T&E Community can quickly perform rigorous constructive simulations with known data sets- Enables an “Apples to Apples” comparison- JAS covers a wide range of realistic, cross-functional

scenarios• Provides the ability to Test, Remodel, and Retest Prior

to first LRIP in a credible analytic scenario- Cuts production and pre-production costs- Allows the T&E Community to identify flaws early

» Recommend vital changes to design, and rerun the simulation

• Offers opportunity to apply early test results to the original National Planning Scenarios- Assess operational implications of shortfalls or expanded

capabilities

Page 14

Page 15: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Cost of ChangeCost of Change

• Cost of change rises exponentially with time

• JAS provides ability to efficiently model the system under test during Analysis & Design phase- Lowers the cost of change- Increases the likelihood of

successful acceptance test

• Enables engineering community to create best of breed solutions

Page 15

Common Campaign Model/Analytical Baseline Scenarios

BiannualUpdates

BiannualUpdates

BiannualUpdates

BiannualUpdates

Field TestingSimulation Based Testing

Page 16: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 16

Regional Geography Used in the Trident Regional Geography Used in the Trident Warrior WargamesWarrior Wargames • Multiple sides,

• Countries and non-state BSEs can change sides,• Considerable coordination and communication of military and civilian law enforcement

Illustrative Findings• Initial level of Alert critical to outcome• Most plans do not address an adaptive opponent

Page 17: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Humanitarian Support ScenarioHumanitarian Support Scenario

Scene of Earthquake

Aircraft Locations

Page 17

Page 18: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 18

JAS Can Federate with MissionJAS Can Federate with Mission--Level Models Level Models

HLA Federa

tion

X

XX

I

I

E I

I

I

E I

x

X

x

X JAS• Campaign-level• Aggregate units• Measures of Effectiveness

JSAF• Mission, in a Campaign context• Views of Individual Platforms• Measures of Performance

Page 19: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 19

JAS as a Test Context GeneratorJAS as a Test Context Generator• Covers the full breadth of the Theater and its external support elements• Uses executable scenarios from the Analytical Baseline for credibility

MissionLevelModel

EngagementSimulation

Air & MissileDefenseDetail

EngineeringSimulation

JAS - A “mile wide”, but thick enough for credible interactions

Air2AirDetail

GroundInteraction

Detail

MaritimeDetail

MITLSimulators

Federating with various models involves some effort, but once completed, other users can employ the same interface

Page 20: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 20

SummarySummary

•• The T&E Community has the opportunity to participate in using a The T&E Community has the opportunity to participate in using a common analytical simulation framework and scenario context to common analytical simulation framework and scenario context to potentially unify the basis of requirements generation, potentially unify the basis of requirements generation, acquisition, and testing. This automatically links early test acquisition, and testing. This automatically links early test simulation effort to the Defense Planning Scenarios and the OSD simulation effort to the Defense Planning Scenarios and the OSD Analytic BaselinesAnalytic Baselines

•• JAS is executable GFE software and comes populated with data JAS is executable GFE software and comes populated with data and scenarios (currently 10 available)and scenarios (currently 10 available)

-- While scenario development from scratch is hard, excursions fromWhile scenario development from scratch is hard, excursions from existing existing scenarios are relatively easy to run. A mix of both Analytical Bscenarios are relatively easy to run. A mix of both Analytical Baseline (MCOaseline (MCO--1 1 and MCOand MCO--2) and Title 10 scenarios are available for immediate execution 2) and Title 10 scenarios are available for immediate execution and and instant credibility with minimum effort. Focus can be on the prinstant credibility with minimum effort. Focus can be on the proposed tests oposed tests and evaluation, not on building scenarios.and evaluation, not on building scenarios.

-- Cost of ownership is low. Replications generally run on PCs in Cost of ownership is low. Replications generally run on PCs in the Windows, the Windows, Unix, or Linux operating system. The larger, more complex scenaUnix, or Linux operating system. The larger, more complex scenarios require rios require considerable data storage and servers to capture all the output.considerable data storage and servers to capture all the output.

-- HLA federation capability allows straightHLA federation capability allows straight--forward access to more detailed forward access to more detailed models and humanmodels and human--inin--thethe--loop simulators that can represent proposed loop simulators that can represent proposed systems to be tested in high detail in a full theater context.systems to be tested in high detail in a full theater context.

Page 21: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

BACKBACK--UPUP

Page 22: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 22

What are the ProductsWhat are the Productsof an Analytical Baseline? of an Analytical Baseline?

•• Scenario descriptionScenario description•• Concept of Operations (CONOPS)Concept of Operations (CONOPS)•• Joint, Service, and Threat DataJoint, Service, and Threat Data•• Initial assumptions, methodology, analytical results, insights, Initial assumptions, methodology, analytical results, insights, and and

challengeschallenges•• Documentation, usually in paper or electronic formatDocumentation, usually in paper or electronic format•• With the addition of JAS to the family of analytical models, an With the addition of JAS to the family of analytical models, an

analysis can also produce an executable and maintainable analysis can also produce an executable and maintainable simulation of the specific Scenario, Plan, or Exercise of interesimulation of the specific Scenario, Plan, or Exercise of interest. st. This can form the basis for further studies or excursions using This can form the basis for further studies or excursions using the same validated scenario.the same validated scenario.-- Over a dozen major scenarios are either completed as the basis fOver a dozen major scenarios are either completed as the basis for or

analytical baselines or are in development.analytical baselines or are in development.-- Three of these MCOThree of these MCO’’s have been translated into JAS.s have been translated into JAS.

Page 23: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 23

Analytic Agenda FutureAnalytic Agenda Future

Page 24: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

DoD M&S Framework and JAS

AcquisitionAT&L

AnalysisPA&E& JS

PlanningJS

& Policy

TestingDOT&E & AT&L

TrainingP&R

ComponentsOSD, Joint Staff, COCOMs & Services

ExperimentationJFCOM J9

• Organized by Communities• DoD M&S coordination structured to support the Communities

Cor

pora

te F

ocus

M&

S Pr

actic

es

Common and Cross-Cutting M&S Tools

Common and Cross-Cutting M&S Data

Common and Cross-Cutting M&S Services

JAS Supported

MCO-2 MCO-1MCO-1/2

Link-16 WMD Sea Basing

MCO-1/2 UE 06UE 06

MCO-2

AFWIUE 06

UnclasMCO-2

MCO-1MCO-2

HPC

Potential Support

Page 25: Improving T&E Participation in the Requirements Generation

24th AnnualNATIONAL

TEST & EVALUATIONCONFERENCE

Page 25

Maritime HLA Example from a Common ScenarioMaritime HLA Example from a Common ScenarioJAS Aggregated Campaign Level• Combatant locations and interactions• C4ISR interactions• Weather/Sea Conditions

HLA Federatio

n

JSAF Disaggregated Mission LevelRepresentation