24

Improving efficiency and cost of production

  • Upload
    thalia

  • View
    23

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Improving efficiency and cost of production. The Profit Equation. PROFIT = PRICE – COP (( Feed Price x HFC ) +(Other costs) ) x Volume (pigs sold x weight). Pig Price. Profit over 14 years ($/sow) based on APL Pig stats and Pig Annual. Comparative costs (Euro/kg carcass weight). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving efficiency and cost of production
Page 2: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Improving efficiency and cost of production

Page 3: Improving efficiency and cost of production

The Profit Equation

PROFIT = PRICE – COP ((Feed Price x HFC ) +(Other costs) ) x Volume (pigs sold x weight)

Page 4: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Pig PriceNational Baconer Price

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

c/k

g H

SC

W

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 5: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Profit over 14 years ($/sow) based on APL Pig stats and Pig Annual

Profit

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

91/92

92/93

93/94

94/95

95/96

96/97

97/98

98/99

99/00

00/01

2001

/200

2

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2005

/200

6

Year

Pro

fit

($/s

ow

)

Profit

Page 6: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Comparative costs (Euro/kg carcass weight)

Country Cost of production (E/kg)

Brazil .99

USA 1.13

Canada 1.16

Poland 1.18

Netherlands 1.30

China 1.35

Australia 1.36

Page 7: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Relative business indicators

Business indicator

USA Canada

Brazil Australia

COP (A$/kg)

1.48 1.55 1.21 2.20

HFC- CW 3.68 3.80 3.75 4.20

Carcass Wt./sow/yr (kg)

1700 1650 1550 1450

Feed ($/tonne)

200 210 220 270

Page 8: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Core program areas1. More reliable and lower cost

energy and protein supply2. Herd feed conversion

efficiency3. Functional pork products4. Education and training

Page 9: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Core Participants

A shared vision…

University of SydneySupporting Participants

Bartlett Grains Pty Ltd

WAAPC – Pork Producers Committee

Grainsearch Pty Ltd

Australasian Pig Science Association

Page 10: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Potential improvement in profit and flexibility

Current TargetsPrice ($/kg) 2.4 2.4

HFC (Carcass) 4.2 3.6

Feed ($/kg) .27 .25

Total feed($/kg) 1.13 .90

Other ($/kg) 0.95 .82

COP ($/kg cwt) 2.08 1.72

Pigs /sow/yr 19 22

Weight (kg) 75 76

Profit/sow ($/yr) 456 1140

Page 11: Improving efficiency and cost of production

HFC Currently averages 4.2 on a

carcass weight basis for Australia (APL Pig Annual 2004).

USA average closer to 3.7 Rather scary when feed costs

27 cents/kg.

Page 12: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Causes? Genetics? Wastage? Poor health ? Low energy diets? Light selling weights? Reproduction Tell me?

Page 13: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of dietary energy -Fat Potential to get added effect on

feed efficiency Reduce total feed delivered Enhance performance in

commercial situations Reduce grain usage Flexibility

Page 14: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Australian Information Results of experiment with boars and

gilts reported by Henman etal in 1999.

Five levels of DE (calculated) ranging from 12.0 to 15.2 MJ/kg.

Animals housed in groups of 10 in commercial-type barn.

Duration of 42 days starting at 63 kg.

Page 15: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of DE on growth rate (g/d) of pigs over 42 days starting at 60 kg.

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

12 12.8 13.6 14.4 15.2

Mixed sex

Page 16: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of dietary DE (MJ/kg) on carcass weight (kg)

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

12 12.8 13.6 14.4 15.2

Mixed sex

Page 17: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of dietary DE on feed: gain

2.20

2.30

2.40

2.50

2.60

2.70

2.80

2.90

3.00

3.10

12 12.8 13.6 14.4 15.2

Mixed sex

Page 18: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of dietary DE on carcass feed: gain

2.20

2.40

2.60

2.80

3.00

3.20

3.40

3.60

12 12.8 13.6 14.4 15.2

Mixed sex

Page 19: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of genetics Comparison of gilts from two

genetic lines. Results from the USA. Pigs compared on the same diets

in the same facility.

Page 20: Improving efficiency and cost of production

The feed:gain of gilts from two genetic lines

Genetics 1 and 2

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300Weight LB

feed

:gai

n

Page 21: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Growth rate (LB/d) and weight (LB)

Growth artes of gilts from two genetic lines

0.50

0.70

0.90

1.10

1.30

1.50

1.70

1.90

2.10

2.30

2.50

0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00Weight (LB)

Daily

gai

n (L

B)

Page 22: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of genetics available today

Performance(20-100 kg)

Genetics 1 Genetics 2

Feed:gain 2.09 (31.4 MJ DE/kg)

2.51 (37.7 MJ/kg)

Feed (kg/pig) 167 201

Growth rate (g/d) 955 841

Grower feed for 5,000 sow unit (tonne/y)Cost difference ($)

15,030

($795,600)

18,090

Page 23: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Effects of 5ppm Paylean for last 21 days

Control Paylean

Growth rate(g/d)

955 1024

Feed usage (kg/pig)

167 155

MJ/kg gain 31.4 28.1

Page 24: Improving efficiency and cost of production

Improving Feed Efficiency We haven’t begun to get serious about

FE? Potential to dramatically reduce feed

usage if willing to try different approaches.

Need to understand the constraints and some may be inherent in our animals and systems.

An exciting area, I look forward to working on with our partners and Australian producers.