Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Improvements in Ocean State Forecasts using
data assimilation in INCOIS
1
Arya Paul Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services ( INCOIS ) India
Siva Reddy ( INCOIS ) Steve Penny ( Univ. of Maryland ) Eugenia Kalnay ( Univ. of Maryland ) Biswamoy Paul ( INCOIS ) Balaji B. ( INCOIS ) D. S. Banerjee ( INCOIS )
Collaborators:
GOVST - VII 2016
Acknowledgments:
Francis Pavanathara ( INCOIS ) Kunal Chakraborty ( INCOIS ) Abhisek Chatterjee ( INCOIS ) Arnab Mukherjee ( INCOIS )
2
INCOIS-GODAS
ROMS (~ 9km)
INCOIS-GODAS (50km zonal & 25km meridional)
MULTI-MODEL “NESTING”
3
ROMS (~9km)
ROMS (2.5km)
ROMS (2.5km)
4
PRESENT STATUS OF ASSIMILATION IN INCOIS
• Global Ocean -- INCOIS – GODAS -- 3D VAR – In-situ T & S Profiles • Indian Ocean -- ROMS 1/12th -- NO ASSIMILATION • Coastal Ocean – ROMS 1/48th -- NO ASSIMILATION
UPCOMING
• Global Ocean -- INCOIS – HYBRID -- GODAS -- 3D VAR + LETKF – In-situ T & S, L2 SST, SSS & SLA • Indian Ocean -- ROMS 1/12th -- LETKF -- In-situ T & S Profiles, CHLA & O2, L2 SST, SSS & SLA • Coastal Ocean – ROMS 1/48th -- LETKF -- In-situ T & S Profiles, CHLA & O2 , L2 SST, SSS & SLA
5 Reference: Stephen Penny et al, Mon. Wea Rev, 143, 4660-4677, (2015)
HYBRIDIZATION
For more info: http://www.incois.gov.in/portal/GODAS
Operational set up of INCOIS-GODAS
References: 1) Ravichandran et al. , 2013, Ocean Modelling 2) Sivareddy et al., 2015, PhD thesis
7
HOW DOES INCOIS-GODAS PERFORM ???
SST RMSD: TMIAMSRE vs Model NCEP-GODAS ECMWF-ORAS4
INCOIS-GODAS
Comparisons are based on 2004-2009
Correlation: Tropical Indian Ocean
ECMWF-ORAS4 NCEP-GODAS INCOIS-GODAS
Correlation: Temperature INCOIS-GODAS compares well with ECMWF-ORAS4 both at the surface and sub-surface layers. NCEP-GODAS poses serious issues at sub-surface layers
SSS Correlation: Argo-gridded vs Model NCEP-GODAS ECMWF-ORAS4
INCOIS-GODAS
Comparisons are based on 2004-2009
Tropical Pacific Ocean
ECMWF-ORAS4 NCEP-GODAS INCOIS-GODAS
Correlation: Salinity INCOIS-GODAS compares well with ECMWF-ORAS4 both at the surface and sub-surface layers. NCEP-GODAS poses serious issues at both surface and sub-surface layers
SLA RMSD: Altimeter vs Model
NCEP-GODAS ECMWF-ORAS4
INCOIS-GODAS
Comparisons are based on 2004-2009
INCOIS-GODAS compares reasonably well despite the absence of SLA assimilation.
Currents
Zonal currents at Eq, 80.5E
Correlation: OSCAR vs Model
Zonal currents in ECMWF-ORAS4 and INCOIS-GODAS are comparable to observations. Performance of NCEP-GODAS is inferior to other two
Monthly updates of climate indices are available by 10th of each month. Service is started in April, 2014. The information is being disseminated from the INCOIS web site www.incois.gov.in/portal/ElNino
Climate Indices from INCOIS-GODAS ocean analysis
SST (degC) Anomaly Temperature anomaly (deg C) averaged over 5S-5N latitudes
NiNO 3.4 SST anomaly
IOD index
De
g C
D
eg
C
De
pth
(m
)
Users of INCOIS-GODAS analysis
Analysis are used as initial and boundary conditions to
operational ROMS at INCOIS
Ocean initial conditions are provided to IITM, Pune for CFS-
V2
Global maps of SST and SST anomalies are provided to IMD-
Pune
Climate indices are used in MoES-ENSO bulletins
Researchers across globe
Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter
( LETKF )
14
Observation Operator
LETKF
Initial background ensemble Observations
Ensemble “observations”
Ensemble analysis
• No model dependency • Each model grid point is simultaneously assimilated. • Very easily parallelized. • No requirement of adjoint.
15
Observation based localization(R Localization)
• Data Assimilation is done in a local volume • All the observation within the circle is assimilated. • State is updated at the red dot.
Ref: Greybush et al, Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 511-522, 2010
System Comparison
16
INCOIS GODAS LETKF-MOM
Model MOM4.0 MOM4.1
Resolution 0.5 degree in zonal
0.25 degree in meridional
between 10S & 10N.
0.5 degree in zonal
0.25 degree in meridional
between 10S & 10N.
No. of levels 40 40
Features 1) River RunOff ON
2) Relaxed to REYNOLDS
SST
3) SSS not relaxed
1) River RunOff OFF
2) Relaxed to LETKF derived
SST
3) Relaxed to LETKF derived
SSS
Assimilation Scheme 3D VAR LETKF with 56 ensemble
members
Observations 1) In-situ temp & salinity 1) In-situ temp & salinity
2) Altimeter
3) L2 SST & L2 SSS
Initial Condition Well Trained 2003 IC pretended as 2010
Run Period 2002 onwards till date Jan 03, 2010 – June 15, 2010
Observations
17
L2 SST
In-situ T & S L2 SSS
L2 SLA
TEMP Time Series Results
18
80.5E,0N,40m
80.5E,8S,40m 90E,15N,40m
80.5E,1.5S,40m
GODAS
obs
Free run
LETKF
TEMP Vertical Profiles
19
80.5E,0N,40m
80.5E,8S,40m 90E,15N,40m
80.5E,1.5S,40m
GODAS
obs
Free run
LETKF
SALT Time Series Results
20
80.5E,0N,40m
80.5E,8S,10m 90E,15N,40m
80.5E,1.5S,40m
GODAS
obs
Free run
LETKF
SALT Vertical Profiles
21
80.5E,0N,40m
80.5E,8S,40m 90E,15N,40m
80.5E,1.5S,40m
GODAS
obs
Free run
LETKF
SLA Correlations
with AVISO
22
Free Model
LETKF-MOM
GODAS
SST Correlations with
REYNOLDS
23
Free Model
LETKF-MOM
GODAS
System Comparison
24
INCOIS GODAS LETKF-ROMS
Model MOM4.0 ROMS 3.6
Resolution 0.5 degree in zonal
0.25 degree in meridional
between 10S & 10N.
~ 10km
No. of levels 40 40
Features 1) River RunOff ON
2) Relaxed to REYNOLDS
SST
3) SSS not relaxed
1) River RunOff OFF
2) SSS relaxed to climatology
3) Fluxes are very coarse (
~200 km resolution )
Assimilation Scheme 3D VAR LETKF with 32 ensemble
members
Observations 1) In-situ temp & salinity 1) In-situ temp & salinity
2) Altimeter
Initial Condition Well Trained 2003 IC pretended as 2010
Run Period 2002 onwards till date Jan 03, 2010 – Nov 25, 2010
25
OBSERVATIONS
SLA TRACKS In-situ T & S (Argo + Buoy)
Not many T & S observations in Indian Ocean in 2010!!!
26
OBSERVATION FREE RUN
LETKF-ROMS INCOIS-GODAS
STANDARD DEVIATION IN SST
27
RMSE of SST
Free LETKF-ROMS
INCOIS-GODAS
28
FREE
LETKF-ROMS INCOIS-GODAS
SST CORRELATION WITH REYNOLDS SST
29
OBSERVATION FREE RUN
LETKF-ROMS INCOIS-GODAS
STANDARD DEVIATION IN SLA
30
Free LETKF-ROMS
INCOIS-GODAS
RMSE of SLA
31
SPATIAL RMSE OF SLA ( in meters )
FREE
LETKF-ROMS INCOIS-GODAS
32
SLA CORRELATION WITH AVISO
FREE
LETKF-ROMS INCOIS-GODAS
33
Obs INCOIS-GODAS FREE LETKF-ROMS
D20
MLD
@ 12 N, 90 E
VERTICAL STRUCTURES
34
@ 8S, 95 E
D20
MLD
Obs INCOIS-GODAS FREE LETKF-ROMS
Obs INCOIS-GODAS FREE LETKF-ROMS
35
WHY IS LETKF-ROMS INFERIOR TO INCOIS-GODAS ?
36
SPREAD IN SST SPREAD IN SSS
SPREAD IN TEMP at 50m SPREAD IN SALT at 50m
Conclusions
37
• INCOIS-GODAS is at par with other data assimilation systems. • Hybrid-LETKF improves ocean states and should be explored. • LETKF-MOM is very promising and improves the ocean states as much as INCOIS-GODAS. • LETKF-ROMS performance is inferior to INCOIS-GODAS. • It may be due to (a) Ensemble Collapse (b) Bad Initial Condition (c) Forcings (d) SST relaxation in INCOIS-GODAS (e) Large Localization Radius of 720 km is smoothening out the fields. • Possible remedy lies in training the initial condition and using smaller localization radius
WE STILL HAVE SOME WAY TO GO !!!
38
39
Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter ( LETKF )
Forecast Step: a
ktt
b
kt xMx ,1,
Analysis Step: b
k
bbbb
i
b
i
b
k
bbb
yyyYxHy
xxxX
~|...|~|~ ;
; ~|...|~|~
21
21
Localization : Choose the observations to be used for each grid point. Estimate the local error covariance and perturbations in ensemble space.
2/111 ~1 ; 1
~ aaTa PkWYRYIkP
Analysis Mean in the ensemble space : bTaa yyRYPw 01~
The new ensemble analysis in model space are stored in the columns of
bab
t
a
t xwXx
Add to each of the columns of awaW
SUB-SURFACE PERFORMANCE OF ROMS
Surface Salinity at (90E & 1.5S)
Sea level anomaly(cm) at (90E & 1.5S) Surface Temperature at (90E & 1.5S)
• 56 Ensemble Members. • In-situ T & S and satellite data of SST are assimilated. •SSS & SLA not assimilated.
-8
12
8
4
0
-4
Observation Free run Assim. Run.
42
Real time (1-day delay) updates of the Global
Ocean from INCOIS-GODAS: 2D fields
SST TCHP
SSHA SSS
NOTE:Plots are of 13th Oct, 2016