Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Implementation of Community-based Poverty Monitoring System in Tanzania
byRangya Kyulu Muro,
For CBMS Team, Dodoma Municipal Council, TanzaniaCBMS Research Report Presented at the PEP Meeting,
June 11- 16, 2007, Lima, Peru.
2
Background information: The United Republic Tanzania
The Population of Tanzania is 36,588,225The Land Area of Tanzania is 945,087 sq km
3
Presentation Contents1. Rationale for CBMS Work
2. Design of the System- Institutional arrangements- Indicators, instruments and modules developed
3. Uses and Applications of CBMS
4. Status of Implementation
5. Next Steps
4
1. Rationale for CBMS Work
a) CBMS Development Objectives in Tanzania- To develop a comprehensive municipal information
system that captures the municipal, ward and village level data and produces reports and analyses that facilitate good planning and decision-making for poverty alleviation.
- To promote participatory planning and budgeting through the use of CBMS
5
Rationale cont’d
b) Importance of Local Monitoring System
To provide the grass root level communities with simple and easy tools to collect data on poverty indicators, to tell the impact of strategies and determine the trend of poverty by themselves
6
Rationale cont’d
c) Expected results of the system
• Local capacity building
• Poverty profiles and maps
• Development plans
• Simple tools and core indicators (locally well-perceived)
7
2. Design of the System2. Design of the System
a) Institutional Arrangements- Human resources in place (mtaa,ward to national
levels)- Involved other parties (NGO’s, CBO’s, SACCOS
groups) and Local community - Roles: development of indicators and tools, data
sharing/dissemination and initiation of entrepreneurship niche).
- Capacity building (on the approach, data collection and analysis): VEO, WEO, Extensionists, NGO’s, CBO’s, residents (retirees, local influential people).
8
Design contDesign cont’’dd
b) Development of Indicators
i) Generation framework:Consultation of other actors and national policies:Vision 2025, MDG’s, LGRP, NSGPR and PMS Tanzania
- Factors considered: national policy standards, local perception and environment of application
9
ii) CBMS Indicators: Initial and Added
Prevalence of micro-nutrition deficienciesFGM cases
Availability of malaria prevention facilities (MDG)
Health Services (skilled and local) (FT)Morbidity casesInfant mortality rate3. Health and NutritionSkilled folkLiteracy rate by gender (NSGPR)Completion of at least standard seven (FT)Primary school enrolment,2. EducationMarital status (FT)
Household size
Existing households
Age groups population1. Demography
INDICATORCOMPONENT
10
ii) CBMS Indicators cont’d
Means of transport
2km Distance to passable road (NSGPR)
Passable road to services6. RoadsLivestock and crop diseasesNumber and type of livestockCrop storage facilitiesAvailability of backyard gardens
Availability of farming/livestock implements
Average yield per hectare (bags)
Major food and cash crops5. Agriculture and Livestock
Availability of solid waste disposal facility
30 minutes go-collect-return water source (NSGPR)
Access to latrineAccess to safe water 4. Water and Sanitation
11
ii) CBMS Indicators cont’d
Begging attitude
Membership in Savings and credit co-operative societies (FT)
Expenditure for food and clothing
Proportion of working age population
Asset ownership (as proxy for income poverty)
8. Income and expenditureStatus (slum or planned area) (MDG)Land tenureHousing ownership
Housing type 7. Shelter
12
ii) CBMS Indicators cont’d
Child labor (NSGPR)Inheritence of wives
Cases of beating of wives/husbands, children
Women emancipation
Violence rate around the neighborhood
Crime incidences 10. Peace and Order
Leadership in the community groups
Attendance to meetings
Registration to formal elections
Membership in community-based organizations9. Participation
13
iv) Compatibility of Indicators with the national statistics
• Poverty Monitoring System
• Tanzania Socio-economic Development Data
• Linked through NSGPR (Mkukuta)
14
c. Instruments and Training Modulesi) Data collection Approach
• Census: household and official questionnaires, Maps (courtesy of St. Albert City and REPOA)
• Coverage: Nala village with 2,478 householdsand K/Ndege Ward with 2,423 householdsUnit of analysis: Household (100%)
• Enumerators:ward/village workers, retirees, local leaders
• Criteria: residents, literacy with arithmetic basics• Training Module: as per CBMS document on
survey tools and results (interpreted in Kiswahili)
Design contDesign cont’’dd
15
ii) Data Processing• Manual: tally sheets• Computerization: Ms Excel, SPSS, NRDB• Processors: 3 at each geopolitical level
(with analysis basics, computer literacy)• Mapping data: Capturing of data involved 2 local
people (conversant with the village/ward area)• Training on the tools and review of methods• On progress:
Generation of Poverty maps: MapInfo + GPSInstallation of databases at geopolitical levels
16
iii) Data ValidationApproach:General meeting in the pilot areaPresentation of the findingsAudience:Council executives, Enumeratorsprocessors, local leaders and localCommunity.Input:Corrections and key issues (c.f. intro meeting)
17
a) Access to CBMS Data- all households, community groups and
other development actorsb) Data Dissemination process (upcoming)
- organize workshop: ward, council, national- distribute copies of final report (institutions)- produce summaries at geopolitical levels
c) Use of the data (upcoming)- poverty maps, area profiles and dev. plans- resource allocation, targeting and impact
monitoring
3. Uses and Application
18
d) Council’s role of disseminating the findings- approval of the findings (council’s committees) and related key issues- share data with other development actors
e) Capacity building on the use of CBMS findings- to the monitors (local level)- to the local community (for relevant data)
Uses Cont’d
19
a) Expression of interest in adopting the CBMS - other wards and villages- other councils expected during and after dissemination
b) Other potential uses of CBMS in Tanzania- monitoring of land use changes- monitoring of spontaneous unplanned settlements (open spaces, marginal areas)
4. Status of Implementation
20
c) Lessons learnt • Household survey should be during non-farming period
• There were more errors in rural area due to low and slow perception of the exercise
• People were not very willing to respond to the questionof income and expenditure; sometime they did not show their home belongings
Status cont’d
21
d) Challenges encountered • NRDB programme could not be well conceived by most
of the data processors
• Dissatisfaction with interview fees especially for remote households
• No enough computers for training and data analysis by the processors.
Status cont’d
22
1. Finalization of the analysis and improvement of the results.
2. Production of poverty maps, spot maps and study area profiles.
3. Preparation of development plans of the pilot areas.4. Presentation of the project results to the
stakeholders at local, council/regional and national levels.
5. Finalizing the Technical Report as per format and lobbying for scaling up of the system in other wards and councils in Tanzania.
5. Next Steps
23
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
END